January 5th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body.
Sir Richard Steele
| South |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K J 9
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ K 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 8 4
♦ Q J 10 9 4
♣ A 4 2 |
♠ 8 7 5 3
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ 8 5
♣ Q 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 2
♥ A Q 10 3
♦ A 2
♣ J 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦Q
While I would never go so far as to say you should never lead your honor from a three-card suit in this position, I would say that the normal lead from your diamond holding is a small card. Imagine declarer with either AJ2 or KJ2 of diamonds to see why leading the queen is potentially such a bad idea.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4
♥ J 7 3 2
♦ Q 7 5
♣ 10 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
January 4th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, December 21st, 2014
|
As a general rule, where do you stand on when redoubles are for rescue after an overcall, and when they simply show good hands – or something else? For instance, after an overcall, would my partner's redouble of a negative or takeout double be for rescue? Or would it show a good hand? In the latter case, is support implied or denied?
Blue for Danger, Twin Falls, Idaho
Redouble by an unpassed hand should show close to opening values, and by a passed hand show decent values. Though such doubles may not be specifically directed towards penalties, all subsequent doubles by either player would be for blood. Redoubles should only be for rescue when someone has made a penalty double, or when there has been a penalty pass of a take-out double.
I am a rubber bridge player, and like to keep it simple. In response to a one club opening bid, I say, if you have a four card major, bid it. My partner had ♠ 7-5, ♥ K-Q-J-9, ♦ A-10-8-5-3, ♣ 3-2 and responded one diamond. I took that as probably weak with no four-card major so bid one no-trump and we missed a playable four heart contract. Where do you stand here?
Old Fashioned, Los Angeles, Calif.
I'm with you. With a one-bid hand, go for majors not minors first. And as opener I would rebid one no-trump over one diamond, in a 4-3-3-3 shape with either major, as you did. I believe a rebid in a major suggests at least four clubs, and if balanced, the hand will deliver decent suits. Playing that way lets partner give preference freely to two clubs.
Last week in our rubber game I responded one heart to one club with: ♠ 9-2, ♥ K-10-6-4, ♦ A-7-2, ♣ A-J-4-2 and after my partner's limit raise to three hearts I simply bid game. We made six hearts when my partner produced a singleton diamond and 16 points, and I was told I had not done enough. Can you comment?
Weak End, Milford, Pa.
|
There is no guarantee of a second fit on this hand (your partner might have only four clubs, or even a 3-4-3-3 18-count). However, your controls argue that you might eke out a four club cuebid in case partner can take control. One effort is more than enough, though. Let partner take it from there.
I do not find it easy to distinguish in a competitive auction between when a cuebid asks, and when it shows. Are there some simple rules I should know?
Socrates, Wilmington, N.C.
After your side opens the bidding, most cuebids below three no-trump are looking for stoppers in the suit bid by the opponents (if you had the suit under control, you would bid no-trump yourself.) But when they have bid or shown two suits, you bid the suit you have stopped. In just the same way, when your side has bid two suits, you show not ask in a third suit; but when you have bid three suits, you ask not tell in the fourth.
My partner and I play relatively disciplined take-out doubles of preempts, but can you comment on whether it is right to double a four-level preempt with a balanced hand? Or should you be more oriented to take-out, or indeed to penalties? And what are you supposed to do with a strong balanced hand over a preempt to four of a major?
Silent Speaker, Olympia, Wash.
Sometimes you may feel too strong to pass and collect a penalty in 50s against a game your way. Since partner will tend to pull either a double of four hearts or four spades with a lot of shape it will (rarely) be right to pass and try to go plus if the alternative is less palatable. I do play a call of four no-trump over four of a minor is natural, but two-suited over a major.
|
January 3rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 20th, 2014
Our discussion is on no trifling matter, but on the right way to conduct our lives.
Plato
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3
♥ K 7 2
♦ A Q 10 9 2
♣ A K 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 6 4
♥ J 9 8 5 3
♦ 5
♣ 9 4 |
♠ 10 9 7 2
♥ Q 6
♦ 7 3
♣ Q 10 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K 8 5
♥ A 10 4
♦ K J 8 6 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
2♦* |
3♠** |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All pass |
*Majors
**Short spades, agreeing diamonds
♦5
This hand is closer to a two diamond overcall than some, but facing a passed hand I feel like I need more for a two diamond overcall than this. Give me the diamond 10 in place of the four, and you might tempt me into indiscretion. As it is, I pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5
♥ A 10 4
♦ K J 8 6 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Everything is funny as long as it happens to someone else.
Will Rogers
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K Q 5
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ 8 6
♣ A K Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 3 2
♥ 10 8 2
♦ Q J 10 7 5
♣ 8 5 |
♠ 4
♥ K J 9 4
♦ 9 4 3 2
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 8 7 6
♥ Q 5
♦ A K
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♦Q
The choice here is to rebid two no-trump to show the nature of your hand, ignoring your small doubleton in a side-suit, or to reverse into two hearts, later pretending that you have a 3-4-1-5 pattern. Of the two, I believe that the first route will work better if your side belongs in game or higher, as you will get to show your majors along the way so long as partner has enough to act over your rebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ 8 6
♣ A K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 1st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Cunning is the dark sanctuary of incapacity.
G. K. Chesterton
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 4 3 2
♥ Q 8 6 3
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ J 10 9 5
♦ Q 9 3
♣ J 9 7 6 5 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ 7 4 2
♦ 8 4
♣ Q 10 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 7 6 5
♥ A K
♦ A K J 6
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
When the opponents overcall over a two club opening, you can stretch to make a positive response with fewer values – a six- or seven-count with a decent five-carder would suffice. When you are weak and balanced I suggest you double with 0-4 high-cards, and pass with 5-7. On that basis, this hand would qualify for a pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3 2
♥ Q 8 6 3
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 31st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
It is our first duty to serve society, and, after we have done that, we may attend wholly to the salvation of our own souls. A youthful passion for abstracted devotion should not be encouraged.
Samuel Johnson
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 8 7 3
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A 4
♣ A 9 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q J 10 3
♦ 10 8 5 2
♣ K J 4 2 |
♠ 9 5 4
♥ 9 8 5
♦ K Q J 6 3
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 2
♥ A K 4
♦ 9 7
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
Even though both opponents are bidding actively, you still have prospects of making game, or at least competing successfully to the three-level. It is not up to you to tell your partner what he has by unilaterally going low, by bidding two hearts. Instead show what you actually have by cuebidding two diamonds, to show a limit raise or better in hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 8 3
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A 4
♣ A 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
A smile is the chosen vehicle for all ambiguities.
Herman Melville
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 8 4
♥ K J 10 5 3
♦ 8 3 2
♣ 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 9 7 6 4 2
♦ A J 7 5 4
♣ Q J 9 |
♠ A 9 2
♥ A Q 8
♦ 9 6
♣ A K 10 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 7 6 5 3
♥ —
♦ K Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| 3♠ |
Dbl. |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣Q
Even when you are a passed hand, you should beware of responding at the two-level with a five-card suit and less than real invitational values. Here, for example, a response of two diamonds would be acceptable if your heart two was the diamond queen. However, on your actual hand it is wiser to respond one no-trump, so as to avoid having to play in spades unless your partner really wants to do so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ 8 7 6 4 2
♦ A J 7 5 4
♣ Q J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 29th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
You see, but you do not observe.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 6 4
♥ 10 6 5 2
♦ A Q J 10 8
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 8 3
♥ K
♦ 7 2
♣ Q 6 4 3 2 |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ 9 8 4
♦ K 5 4
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 10 5
♥ A Q J 7 3
♦ 9 6 3
♣ A J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
There is no good reason not to lead hearts here. I can make a decent case for leading the queen rather than a low heart, since if dummy has the king, and your partner the ace-jack, you might in this way be able to lead hearts repeatedly, and force declarer to ruff, thus depriving him of trump control. I'm not sure I'd make this play without the heart 10.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 4 2
♥ Q 10 3
♦ Q 8 2
♣ J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 28th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
My partner opened the bidding in second seat with one club, and my RHO overcalled two hearts. I responded three diamonds, assuming it to be forcing, but my partner passed with a minimum and a misfit. My partner says my three diamonds bid is just competitive and if I wanted to force I should double. I contend that as an unpassed responder, my new suit response is forcing. I can see the logic in each argument. What do you say?
Miked Up, Harrisburg, Pa.
I'm delighted to say you are right and he is wrong. After an overcall, new suits by an unpassed responder are all natural and forcing – for one round, though not to game. However, new suits at the three-level are game-forcing. Yes, you can double with moderate hands hoping to get a second shot but you must bid your good hands out at once to avoid being preempted out of your suit.
I moved East from San Francisco, and almost everyone of the players here is a Life Master of one kind or another. They defend with something called "odd or even" though they have never learned to count! Do you recommend I should take this up, or try to persuade them to take up something else instead?
Nonplussed Newbie, Spartanburg, S.C.
Odd/Even discards are somewhat sophisticated but not a bad idea. (This Bridge Hands link might help.) Their benefit is that you do not have to discard from the suit you like to get the message across. Give them a try – but encourage your partner to count too…
As a refugee from a style 50 years ago, where jumps were strong, I realize I have a lot to learn. When it is correct to play jump raises as preemptive, and when to play a more traditional style of limit or forcing raise?
Dinosaur Dan, Wausau, Wis.
|
In uncontested auctions you need both a limit raise and a forcing raise. (In the majors that would be shown by a jump raise and Jacoby two no-trump, while in the minors the inverted raise is the way to show at least a limit raise). In contested auctions the focus changes, to require you to be able to raise partner as fast and safely as possible; jump-raises are made with distributional hands. A cue-bid (or a jump to two no-trump after an opening bid gets doubled) shows a limit raise or better.
I recently misread an auction where my partner balanced over one heart with a call of one spade; then when opener competed to two diamonds, my partner balanced again, this time with a double. Should this be penalty, cards, or take-out?
Desperately Seeking Sanity, Dover, Del.
After overcalling or balancing, most doubles facing a silent partner are for take-out. Here I expect your partner might be something like 4-5 or 3-5 in the unbid suits, with at least opening values, unwilling to sell out when the opponents appear to have found a fit.
I passed in first chair with: ♠ A-J-8-7-2, ♥ 10-2, ♦ K-9-3-2, ♣ Q-4 and responded one spade to my partner's one heart opening bid. What was my best course of action over his two-club rebid?
More or Less, Panama City, Fla.
As a passed hand you could bid two diamonds, the fourth suit, or make a natural bid of two no-trump, both of which are only a trifle optimistic; give me the diamond 10 in addition and I'd follow the latter route. As an alternative, giving preference to two hearts is better than rebidding the spades. Your hand offers a ruffing value, and you know you have at least a partial fit in hearts.
|
December 27th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
All men are liable to error, and most men are, I many points by passion or interest, under temptation to it.
John Locke
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K Q 10 8
♥ A K Q J 10
♦ 4
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ 9 5 3
♦ A Q 10 9 7 5 3 2
♣ 2 |
♠ J 7 5 4 2
♥ 6 2
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 9 3
♥ 8 7 4
♦ K J
♣ A J 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
5♦ |
6♦ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
It is acceptable to preempt with six clubs, since no weak-two bid is available, but only if non-vulnerable. Also, the suit should have at least two of the top four clubs and not too much outside defense. The flaws here are that you might lose many trump tricks facing a singleton, while taking too many tricks on defense. I'd pass; change the club three to the 10 and you could sell me on the action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 3
♥ 8 7 4
♦ K J
♣ A J 7 6 4 3 |
|
Today's deal details two points of technique, which the inexperienced player should try to master.
The first one involves when to win and when to duck at a no-trump contract. There is no hard and fast rule but it is generally true that when you hold a single stopper in the suit the opponents lead, you tend to hold up if there is no shift you fear. Meanwhile, if you hold two guards, the calculation is far more complex, and tends to hinge on how many high cards you know you will need to knock out.
In today’s deal South ducked the opening lead of the diamond queen, despite the risk coming from a spade shift, because he could see that he might have a considerable amount of work to do in diamonds. Next came a diamond to his ace, and now South played the club jack to East’s queen. That player shifted to a spade at trick four, and it was tempting to let this run to dummy’s queen. However South saw that he would be in danger if West held both the spade king and diamond ace, since he would win and clear diamonds while he still retained his club entry, and declarer has only eight winners.
So South rose with the spade ace then went back to clubs. He could now ensure that he would make a spade trick, four hearts, two diamonds and two clubs, while the defenders were limited to one diamond and three black-suit winners.