December 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Could you clarify for me what sort of values you would need to back into the following 'live' auction. Say you pass over a one club opening bid, but then after LHO bids one spade, and RHO raises to two spades, you step in with a double. Does this show a good hand or just balancing values? And is it take-out for the two unbid suits, or a three-suited hand short in spades?
Re-entry Permit, Fredericksburg, Va.
This sort of sequence provokes much discussion. Since your LHO could be about to jump to four spades, I think you need a good hand to come in here. So a three-suiter with full opening values is most likely, since two no-trump might show the unbid suits. In balancing seat, of course, I'd expect this double to be two-suited, and not necessarily a good hand.
Can you discuss the technical merits in a reasonable standard pair game of the third-seat opening of one spade as opposed to one club with: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2? How important is vulnerability in the equation?
Planning Ahead, Albuquerque, N.M.
In third seat the logic of opening a lead-directing major suit on hands where you intend to pass the response, whatever it is, does make sense. Here you are not ashamed of opening one club and rebidding one spade or one no-trump, while the spades are not quite good enough to look forward to a lead from shortage – or a raise on three. Change the spades spots to include the 10 and you'd persuade me.
I've read many snooty comments about ace-asking gadgets, specifically about Gerber, though many experts seem to favor cuebidding over Blackwood. Where do you stand?
Bashful Basher, Levittown, Pa.
|
Two points: cuebidding requires judgment, Blackwood requires the ability to count up to (or down from) four, and even keycard Blackwood only involves five keycards and the trump queen. That said, don't ever use Blackwood or Gerber if you can calculate that you won't know what to do over a normal response. I'm not as concerned as some about asking for aces with two losers in a side-suit; the opponents don't always cash them…
In first chair with ♠ A-9-7-2, ♥ 7, ♦ A-Q-10-5-2, ♣ K-Q-4 I opened one diamond, and heard my partner respond one spade. Without intervention this feels like a simple bid of three spades. But in fact I heard my RHO skip to three hearts. Was I right to bid three spades now, or should I have done more?
Competing Forces, Edmonton, Alberta
As you correctly imply, a three spade bid in competition might be distinctly shaded by comparison one in an uncontested auction. That might persuade you to jump to four spades now, since your partner could reasonably assume that you would compete to three spades with a balanced minimum opener with four spades. Clearly you do have a much better hand than that.
I believe you are not the world's biggest fan of playing inverted minors — and if so how forcing should they be, to game, or for one round?
Raising Arizona, Corpus Christi, Texas
I'm not opposed to playing inverted minors although I'm not their greatest fan, and do not play them in competition. I think at teams one should play the raise as forcing to three of the minor, but at pairs if opener or responder rebids two no-trump or three of the agreed minor after the Inverted Minor, I play this can be passed.
|
December 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
One man is as good as another until he has written a book.
Benjamin Jowett
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 4 3
♥ Q 10 6 3
♦ 4 2
♣ A J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 2
♥ K J 9 7 2
♦ K Q 10 7 6
♣ 9 |
♠ Q 8
♥ 4
♦ A J 9 5
♣ 10 8 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9 7 6 5
♥ A 8 5
♦ 8 3
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2♠ |
3♥* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Limit or better in spades
♦K
With these values, you have enough to invite game or defend a doubled partscore, but you do not have enough to drive to game. I would double, meaning it as cards, with the emphasis on takeout, planning to rebid two no-trump over a red-suit to suggest a single spade stopper. But if partner bid clubs, I will simply raise that suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4 3
♥ Q 10 6 3
♦ 4 2
♣ A J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
What Englishman will give his mind to politics if he can afford to keep a motorcar?
George Bernard Shaw
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 6 3
♥ 8 3
♦ A 10 9 6 4
♣ Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ 3
♣ K 10 8 2 |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ K 9 4
♦ J 8 7 2
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K 5 2
♥ A Q J 10
♦ K Q 5
♣ J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠Q
This auction suggests a minimum or sub-minimum opener with either 5-4 or 5-5 pattern. Since the auction has suggested a possible bad break in hearts and clubs rates to play as well as hearts, even in a 4-3 fit, I would pass now and simply try to go plus here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 3
♥ 8 3
♦ A 10 9 6 4
♣ Q 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
| Rdbl. |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Life teaches us to be less harsh with ourselves and with others.
Johann Goethe
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K J 9 3
♥ 9 8 5 3
♦ K 7
♣ K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ K Q 7 2
♦ A 9 5 2
♣ Q 10 7 5 |
♠ 10 7 6 5 4
♥ 10
♦ J 10 8 6 4
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
♠ 8 2
♥ A J 6 4
♦ Q 3
♣ A J 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦* |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
*Artificial and forcing
♣5
Your partner's negative double shows four hearts and at least 7 HCP. Where you have a little extra shape, and a suit you want to introduce, you should generally be guided by the idea that with any reasonable excuse you can bid one level higher than you initially intended, but not two levels. Here your 5-4 pattern with values in your long suits makes a call of three hearts just about acceptable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 2
♥ A J 6 4
♦ Q 3
♣ A J 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Great abilities are not requisite for an Historian… Imagination is not required in any high degree.
Samuel Johnson
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 6 4
♥ Q 8 5 2
♦ K 7 6
♣ Q J 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 3 2
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 8 2
♣ 10 4 2 |
♠ K 10
♥ A K J 9
♦ 10 5 3
♣ 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 5
♥ 7 6 3
♦ A J 9 4
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠3
The three club call is forcing (it makes sense to play everything but a pass of two no-trump as setting up a game force here, in the absence of any conventional agreement). The issue is whether to show your three-card heart support or make some other rebid. Despite the weak hearts I would bid three hearts and let partner decide what to do – he knows much more about our hand than we do about his.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 5
♥ 7 6 3
♦ A J 9 4
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
O monstrous! But one half-pennyworth of bread to this intolerable deal of sack.
William Shakespeare
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 8 7 6 4
♥ Q 10 9 5
♦ J 3
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ J 3
♦ A 10 9 8 6 5 4 2
♣ Q 7 5 |
♠ 5 2
♥ A K 8 6 4 2
♦ Q
♣ K 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 9 3
♥ 7
♦ K 7
♣ J 10 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠ |
3♦ |
4♠ |
5♥ |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥J
Despite your lack of fit for diamonds I would compete to three spades. Yes your red suits might argue for defense but your black-suit holdings have a lot of actual and potential tricks. Game might so easily be cold facing a hand with a void in spades!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 10 9 3
♥ 7
♦ K 7
♣ J 10 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
3♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When people come and talk to you of their aspirations, before they leave you had better count your spoons.
Logan Pearsall Smith
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K Q 10 9
♥ J 5
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ 10 9 8 3 2
♦ 2
♣ 10 8 7 3 |
♠ 6 5 3 2
♥ K Q 4
♦ A Q 3
♣ K J 2 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A 7 6
♦ J 8 7 5 4
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥10
Dummy rates to put down a 5332 pattern, or perhaps a hand with four spades and five hearts, the latter being far less likely. In these situations, while one can make a case for leading spades – in that your partner may well have four of them, the lead is also quite likely to cost a spade trick. I'd settle for the fourth highest diamond. Even if partner has no honor in diamonds, the lead may not cost a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4
♥ Q 10 5 3
♦ K J 6 4
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
I dealt myself this beautiful hand: ♠ K-7-2, ♥ J-6, ♦ A-K-9-6-3, ♣ A-Q-J. I opened one diamond, playing a 15-17 no-trump, and my partner responded one spade, whereupon the next hand bid three hearts. Was I wrong to bid three spades? It worked extremely badly when my partner had king-queen-third of hearts. We went down in three spades with three no-trump laydown.
Embarrassment of Riches, Vancouver, Wash.
While you were surely unlucky that you had neither a heart stop (when you could have tried three no-trump) or better spades to make the raise more palatable, I believe you had a better choice. The double of a preempt in this position should show extras, with no clear direction; so it would have been my preferred choice.
We had a hand last week which has sparked a bit of controversy as to how to reach the optimum contract. I heard my partner open two clubs and with: ♠ 3, ♥ 5, ♦ A-Q-J-8-5-3, ♣ A-Q-J-7-4 responded three diamonds, then bid four clubs over my partner's three spade bid. Now my partner bid four hearts and I bid five diamonds, passing my partner's six diamond bid. We were cold for seven no-trumps facing a powerhouse 5-5-2-1 shape with both minor kings.
Love in Bloom, Bristol, Va.
Your partner's four heart call looks wrong. Had he simply bid four diamonds, you can jump to six clubs and he can do the rest. Even Blackwood might get you there if you can bid six clubs after finding the keycards are all present.
When your partner opens a weak two bid, should new suits by you be natural and forcing, or can they be passed by a minimum preempter?
Force of Nature, Dodge City, Kansas
|
This is to some extent about partnership agreement, rather than a rule of law, but having said that, it would seems normal to play a new suit as natural and forcing, but not necessarily forcing to game. After this start to the auction, anything by either hand that sounds non-forcing may almost certainly be passed.
I picked up: ♠ J-2, ♥ K-J-8-5-4-2, ♦ Q-2, ♣ Q-4-3 and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one spade. Clearly I had enough to bid one heart over one diamond, but is this hand strong enough to bid two hearts here? If not, what call is best?
Keeping it Real, Peru, Ind.
A free bid at the two-level should guarantee 10 or more high-card points but you can shade the requirement with a strong suits or good controls, or even with fit for partner). This hand feels too scrappy for a direct call in hearts. If playing negative doubles, I would double and hope to back into hearts later.
Do you think that four-suit transfers over a TWO no-trump opening are a good idea? If so, how exactly would you play them?
Truffle Hunter, Woodland Hills, Calif.
While that system works well over one no-trump there is not quite enough space over two no-trumps. One simple solution is to use a three spade response as one or both minors. It forces a three no-trump rebid by opener, whereupon the minor suits now show single-suited hands, while four hearts, four spades and four no-trump show both minors with 5-4 pattern and 5-5 respectively.
|
December 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, November 29th, 2014
If you can meet with triumph and disaster And treat those two impostors just the same.
Rudyard Kipling
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 9 7 4
♥ Q 5 2
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ K J 4
♦ A 4 3
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
♠ Q 10 3
♥ 9 7
♦ K J 5
♣ A Q J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ K J 8
♥ A 10 8 6 3
♦ 9 8 7
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
1 NT |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
| 2♥ |
3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣9
Normally one requires four trumps to raise one's partner, but this hand looks like a raise to two diamonds. Your hand seems to offer the equivalent playing strength as a four-card raise. Incidentally, some would play the double here as showing three trumps. Others use it to distinguish between a balanced and an unbalanced hand with four spades — you double with the former and bid one spade with the latter.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3
♥ 9 7
♦ K J 5
♣ A Q J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A sadder and a wiser man He rose the morrow morn.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 7 3
♥ 9 7 5
♦ A 10 6
♣ A 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 5 2
♥ 10 4 3
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 4 |
♠ Q J 8 6
♥ K Q 2
♦ 9 4 3
♣ Q 7 6 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ A J 8 6
♦ K Q 8 2
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Pick a minor
♠K
Rather than drive your hand to four spades, start by cuebidding two diamonds to shows a strong hand, asking your partner to describe his hand by bidding suits up the line. If he bids two hearts, you can bid two spades, which is forcing as far as suit agreement here. This gives you room for proper exploration.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5 2
♥ 10 4 3
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Last year Tim Bourke of Australia teamed up with Jason Corfield to construct a fascinating book, "The Art of Declarer Play". This consists of tough problems, together with a primer of how to think like an expert.
Here is a deal from the book. Against four spades West leads the diamond king and continues with a low diamond to the ace, for a switch to a heart. You rise with the heart ace; your move.
If West has two clubs and one spade, you can unblock your club honors before leading a spade to the ace. Then, after discarding your heart losers on the club ace-jack, you go back to spades.
However, if West has two spades and one club West would ruff the second round of clubs then, cash the heart king, and give East a heart ruff. (In this case you should simply draw trumps, since you only need to take three club tricks.)
Which line should you play? Neither – the best if surprising line of play is to immediately run the spade nine or 10 from hand! If West follows small, you duck the trick into the safe hand. Now you can win the return, cash the spade king and then play the club king-queen. This play also succeeds when West is void in trumps.
If West covers the spade 10 with an honor, you take dummy’s ace and finesse East for the remaining trump honor. You lose to West’s holding of Q-J doubleton of spades, but make the rest of the time.