|
Could you clarify for me what sort of values you would need to back into the following 'live' auction. Say you pass over a one club opening bid, but then after LHO bids one spade, and RHO raises to two spades, you step in with a double. Does this show a good hand or just balancing values? And is it take-out for the two unbid suits, or a three-suited hand short in spades?
Re-entry Permit, Fredericksburg, Va.
This sort of sequence provokes much discussion. Since your LHO could be about to jump to four spades, I think you need a good hand to come in here. So a three-suiter with full opening values is most likely, since two no-trump might show the unbid suits. In balancing seat, of course, I'd expect this double to be two-suited, and not necessarily a good hand.
Can you discuss the technical merits in a reasonable standard pair game of the third-seat opening of one spade as opposed to one club with: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2? How important is vulnerability in the equation?
Planning Ahead, Albuquerque, N.M.
In third seat the logic of opening a lead-directing major suit on hands where you intend to pass the response, whatever it is, does make sense. Here you are not ashamed of opening one club and rebidding one spade or one no-trump, while the spades are not quite good enough to look forward to a lead from shortage – or a raise on three. Change the spades spots to include the 10 and you'd persuade me.
I've read many snooty comments about ace-asking gadgets, specifically about Gerber, though many experts seem to favor cuebidding over Blackwood. Where do you stand?
Bashful Basher, Levittown, Pa.
|
Two points: cuebidding requires judgment, Blackwood requires the ability to count up to (or down from) four, and even keycard Blackwood only involves five keycards and the trump queen. That said, don't ever use Blackwood or Gerber if you can calculate that you won't know what to do over a normal response. I'm not as concerned as some about asking for aces with two losers in a side-suit; the opponents don't always cash them…
In first chair with ♠ A-9-7-2, ♥ 7, ♦ A-Q-10-5-2, ♣ K-Q-4 I opened one diamond, and heard my partner respond one spade. Without intervention this feels like a simple bid of three spades. But in fact I heard my RHO skip to three hearts. Was I right to bid three spades now, or should I have done more?
Competing Forces, Edmonton, Alberta
As you correctly imply, a three spade bid in competition might be distinctly shaded by comparison one in an uncontested auction. That might persuade you to jump to four spades now, since your partner could reasonably assume that you would compete to three spades with a balanced minimum opener with four spades. Clearly you do have a much better hand than that.
I believe you are not the world's biggest fan of playing inverted minors — and if so how forcing should they be, to game, or for one round?
Raising Arizona, Corpus Christi, Texas
I'm not opposed to playing inverted minors although I'm not their greatest fan, and do not play them in competition. I think at teams one should play the raise as forcing to three of the minor, but at pairs if opener or responder rebids two no-trump or three of the agreed minor after the Inverted Minor, I play this can be passed.
|
Today's deal from the quarter-final of a recent world championships saw South with the same problem of what to do after hearing their partner open one club, then balance with a double of their right hand opponent's call of four hearts.
Had they known how balanced their partner was, they might have preferred to defend and collect plus 300, but we all have 20/20 hindsight, and at the table it looked right to bid four spades.
After West led a heart, East cashed the ace and king. What should East have done next? Quite a few defenders played a third heart to weaken declarer’s trumps. South pitched a diamond from hand, and ruffed in the dummy. Then he played the trump ace and 10, and East won with the king and played a fourth heart. Alas for the defenders, South simply ruffed and drew the last two trumps. Next, by starting clubs with a top honor from dummy, declarer could cater for either opponent holding four clubs, and ensure their game.
When Anne Rosen of the eventually victorious English women’s team was in the same position, she saw that declarer could not be defeated if she had five spades, so she focused her attention on setting the hand if South had just four spades.
Anxious to protect her potential tricks in spades and diamonds, she exited with a low trump at trick three. All declarer could do was win and play ace and another trump. But now Rosen could win and continue hearts, waiting to make the diamond king at the end for down one.