December 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
O monstrous! But one half-pennyworth of bread to this intolerable deal of sack.
William Shakespeare
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 8 7 6 4
♥ Q 10 9 5
♦ J 3
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ J 3
♦ A 10 9 8 6 5 4 2
♣ Q 7 5 |
♠ 5 2
♥ A K 8 6 4 2
♦ Q
♣ K 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 9 3
♥ 7
♦ K 7
♣ J 10 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♠ |
3♦ |
4♠ |
5♥ |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥J
Despite your lack of fit for diamonds I would compete to three spades. Yes your red suits might argue for defense but your black-suit holdings have a lot of actual and potential tricks. Game might so easily be cold facing a hand with a void in spades!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 10 9 3
♥ 7
♦ K 7
♣ J 10 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
3♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When people come and talk to you of their aspirations, before they leave you had better count your spoons.
Logan Pearsall Smith
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K Q 10 9
♥ J 5
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ 10 9 8 3 2
♦ 2
♣ 10 8 7 3 |
♠ 6 5 3 2
♥ K Q 4
♦ A Q 3
♣ K J 2 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A 7 6
♦ J 8 7 5 4
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥10
Dummy rates to put down a 5332 pattern, or perhaps a hand with four spades and five hearts, the latter being far less likely. In these situations, while one can make a case for leading spades – in that your partner may well have four of them, the lead is also quite likely to cost a spade trick. I'd settle for the fourth highest diamond. Even if partner has no honor in diamonds, the lead may not cost a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4
♥ Q 10 5 3
♦ K J 6 4
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
I dealt myself this beautiful hand: ♠ K-7-2, ♥ J-6, ♦ A-K-9-6-3, ♣ A-Q-J. I opened one diamond, playing a 15-17 no-trump, and my partner responded one spade, whereupon the next hand bid three hearts. Was I wrong to bid three spades? It worked extremely badly when my partner had king-queen-third of hearts. We went down in three spades with three no-trump laydown.
Embarrassment of Riches, Vancouver, Wash.
While you were surely unlucky that you had neither a heart stop (when you could have tried three no-trump) or better spades to make the raise more palatable, I believe you had a better choice. The double of a preempt in this position should show extras, with no clear direction; so it would have been my preferred choice.
We had a hand last week which has sparked a bit of controversy as to how to reach the optimum contract. I heard my partner open two clubs and with: ♠ 3, ♥ 5, ♦ A-Q-J-8-5-3, ♣ A-Q-J-7-4 responded three diamonds, then bid four clubs over my partner's three spade bid. Now my partner bid four hearts and I bid five diamonds, passing my partner's six diamond bid. We were cold for seven no-trumps facing a powerhouse 5-5-2-1 shape with both minor kings.
Love in Bloom, Bristol, Va.
Your partner's four heart call looks wrong. Had he simply bid four diamonds, you can jump to six clubs and he can do the rest. Even Blackwood might get you there if you can bid six clubs after finding the keycards are all present.
When your partner opens a weak two bid, should new suits by you be natural and forcing, or can they be passed by a minimum preempter?
Force of Nature, Dodge City, Kansas
|
This is to some extent about partnership agreement, rather than a rule of law, but having said that, it would seems normal to play a new suit as natural and forcing, but not necessarily forcing to game. After this start to the auction, anything by either hand that sounds non-forcing may almost certainly be passed.
I picked up: ♠ J-2, ♥ K-J-8-5-4-2, ♦ Q-2, ♣ Q-4-3 and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one spade. Clearly I had enough to bid one heart over one diamond, but is this hand strong enough to bid two hearts here? If not, what call is best?
Keeping it Real, Peru, Ind.
A free bid at the two-level should guarantee 10 or more high-card points but you can shade the requirement with a strong suits or good controls, or even with fit for partner). This hand feels too scrappy for a direct call in hearts. If playing negative doubles, I would double and hope to back into hearts later.
Do you think that four-suit transfers over a TWO no-trump opening are a good idea? If so, how exactly would you play them?
Truffle Hunter, Woodland Hills, Calif.
While that system works well over one no-trump there is not quite enough space over two no-trumps. One simple solution is to use a three spade response as one or both minors. It forces a three no-trump rebid by opener, whereupon the minor suits now show single-suited hands, while four hearts, four spades and four no-trump show both minors with 5-4 pattern and 5-5 respectively.
|
December 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, November 29th, 2014
If you can meet with triumph and disaster And treat those two impostors just the same.
Rudyard Kipling
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 9 7 4
♥ Q 5 2
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ K J 4
♦ A 4 3
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
♠ Q 10 3
♥ 9 7
♦ K J 5
♣ A Q J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ K J 8
♥ A 10 8 6 3
♦ 9 8 7
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♥ |
1 NT |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
| 2♥ |
3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣9
Normally one requires four trumps to raise one's partner, but this hand looks like a raise to two diamonds. Your hand seems to offer the equivalent playing strength as a four-card raise. Incidentally, some would play the double here as showing three trumps. Others use it to distinguish between a balanced and an unbalanced hand with four spades — you double with the former and bid one spade with the latter.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3
♥ 9 7
♦ K J 5
♣ A Q J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A sadder and a wiser man He rose the morrow morn.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 7 3
♥ 9 7 5
♦ A 10 6
♣ A 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 5 2
♥ 10 4 3
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 4 |
♠ Q J 8 6
♥ K Q 2
♦ 9 4 3
♣ Q 7 6 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ A J 8 6
♦ K Q 8 2
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Pick a minor
♠K
Rather than drive your hand to four spades, start by cuebidding two diamonds to shows a strong hand, asking your partner to describe his hand by bidding suits up the line. If he bids two hearts, you can bid two spades, which is forcing as far as suit agreement here. This gives you room for proper exploration.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5 2
♥ 10 4 3
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
A fool… is a man who has never tried an experiment in his life.
Erasmus Darwin
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 8 4
♥ A 10 6 3
♦ K 9 7
♣ A 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 6 3
♥ 8 2
♦ 10 6 5 4
♣ 10 2 |
♠ 2
♥ J 9
♦ Q J 8 3
♣ Q 9 8 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 7 5
♥ K Q 7 5 4
♦ A 2
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Dbl. |
5♦ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
While there is a case for a simple call of three hearts, I prefer to rebid two no-trumps, to describe the essentially balanced nature of my hand. The only concern about this call is whether it would be consistent with a hand with short spades and three hearts, but with that hand one would rebid three clubs now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 4
♥ A 10 6 3
♦ K 9 7
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Life doesn't offers charity, it offers chance.
Amit Kalantri
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 7 5 4
♥ 9 2
♦ K Q 7 6 3
♣ A 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 6
♥ K Q J 4
♦ A 10 8
♣ Q J 9 |
♠ 10 8
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ 4 2
♣ 8 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 3 2
♥ 7 6 3
♦ J 9 5
♣ K 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 NT |
2♦* |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
3♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Diamonds and a major.
♥K
When your partner makes a negative double here it would be wildly speculative to pass and pay for penalties, though I'm not saying it might not work on a different day. Instead your real choice is to rebid one no-trump or repeat diamonds. Put me in the former camp.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5 4
♥ 9 2
♦ K Q 7 6 3
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
To dance to flutes, to dance to lutes Is delicate and rare: But it is not sweet with nimble feet To dance upon the air!
Oscar Wilde
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 9
♥ J 10 8 7 2
♦ A 3
♣ Q 8 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 4 3
♥ 6 4
♦ K J 10 6 4 2
♣ 3 |
♠ A K Q 8 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 8 7
♣ K 10 9 2 |
| South |
♠ 7 6 5
♥ A K Q 5 3
♦ Q 5
♣ A J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| 2♥ |
4♠ |
5♥ |
All pass |
♠J
There are two reasonable approaches (given that your partner has shown a limit raise or better in spades, and your weakest action here is to rebid two spades). A call of three clubs shows extras and is natural; alternatively, you could pass, and sell out if partner simply bids two spades, while moving on if your partner does anything else but sign off. I prefer the latter (slightly conservative) approach.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 8 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 8 7
♣ K 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
It is better to be a fool than to be dead.
Robert Louis Stevenson
| East |
North |
| None |
♠ Q J 9
♥ Q 9 8
♦ A K 10 4 2
♣ K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 5 4
♥ 10
♦ 8 7 3
♣ A Q 8 6 5 |
♠ K 3 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ Q 5
♣ 10 9 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6
♥ A K J 6 3 2
♦ J 9 6
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♣* |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♦** |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*One ace **The trump queen and diamond king
♣A
This is close; with a likely reentry, and your opponents not expressing concern about spade stoppers for no-trump, I'd lead a top heart and prepare my apologies in advance if I'm wrong. It is the outside entry that persuades me to go after hearts; with the club queen instead of the king I might go the other way.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 2
♥ J 10 9 4 3
♦ 9 8
♣ K 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
December 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
In a recent Bid with the Aces when an unopposed auction started with one club — one heart — one spade, why did you advocate raising two clubs with a 1-4-4-4 pattern and four small clubs and four decent diamonds, rather than rebidding no-trump?
Suitable Case for Treatment, Boise, Idaho
For me opener's sequence always delivers clubs (at least four) so I'd prefer to play clubs than no-trumps here. We can always play the no-trump game if partner has extras, since he won't pass me out in two clubs. For the record with a 4-3-3-3 pattern as opener I would rebid one no-trump over one heart rather than bid one spade. I might miss a partscore in spades, but I'll be far better placed facing a strong hand.
What is your opinion on playing Fishbein or a defense such as Lower Minor over your opponents' preempts? Do you recommend using a take-out double against every preempt, or is there some other defense that you consider preferable?
Catcher in the Rye, Trenton, N.J.
The advantage of playing take-out doubles over your opponents' preempts is that they are simple, and arise more frequently than the penalty double, no matter what your opponents' style might be. The world plays take-out doubles, so my guess is that this must be because it is best. I would say that one should double an artificial preemptive call initially just to show values, with a second double showing a strong balanced hand. Pass then double for take-out.
Can you tell me what is the meaning of the convention: fourth-suit forcing? Does it apply by both passed and unpassed hands?
Newbie, Winston-Salem, N.C.
|
After an unopposed auction starts with three different suit bids, responder at his second turn as an unpassed hand can force to game by making his second call in the fourth suit. The implication of the call is that you have an opening bid or better. It asks opener to describe his hand by rebidding one of his suits with as yet unshown length, or to raise opener's suit, or else to bid no-trump with length or strength in the fourth suit. Fourth suit is also forcing for one round by a passed hand, tending to deny support for opener's suits.
Recently the auction began with a call of one diamond to my right. Holding: ♠ 9-6-3, ♥ Q-3-2, ♦ A-K-5-3, ♣ K-J-4, I passed. Now came one spade to my left, two clubs to my right, and two diamonds to my left. It looked like the auction was about to die, but what would a double by my partner have shown now? At the table my partner bid two hearts, and my RHO re-raised to three diamonds. What should I have done?
Gentleman Jim, Dallas, Texas
A double of two diamonds would be takeout for the majors — partner's failure to call at his first turn is surely based on spade length, and he might easily have only three hearts. At the table, over three diamonds, you surely have to bid, with maybe the best hand at the table. I'd double and lead trumps.
Can you suggest a suitable book that combines bridge and humor? My small sample has suggested that these two things frequently do not go hand in hand.
Court Jester, Poughkeepsie, N. Y.
The funniest book I have ever read about bridge is called Uncensored Memoirs of a Tournament Director, by Jerome Machlin, which is long out of print. Eddie Kantar and Jeff Rubens are superb players who have focused in some cases on humorous stories along with excellent bridge hands, the former appealing more to the inexperienced tournament player, the latter to the expert.
|
|
In today’s column we feature a deal from the latest book by Augie Boehm, a noted bridge player and pianist. The book is ‘Big Deal’– both a memoir and a teaching tool.
During the auction South made a cardinal error when he preempted then bid again in competition. He might have done better to open one spade, but having initially underbid, he endplayed himself into a later indiscretion. Of course if he had passed five hearts, North would have happily collected a sizable penalty.
Against five spades doubled, Boehm’s famous pianist partner Leonard Pennario led the heart jack. If South had routinely covered with dummy’s queen, East would have been compelled to win, and with an easy shift to his singleton diamond queen he would have collected his penalty of plus 300.
But when South didn’t cover with dummy’s queen, Boehm had a problem. Overtaking to shift to diamonds would work poorly if West held the diamond ace. If so, dummy’s hearts could be established for discards of South’s losing diamonds.
At trick one, Boehm therefore discouraged with the heart two. Pennario realized that Boehm must have both top hearts when his jack held, but he must have discouraged the continuation for a reason. He therefore accurately shifted to the diamond ace and gave his partner the ruff for plus 500.
Boehm comments sagely that average opponents usually assume an expert knows what he is doing, hence South’s sacrifice over five hearts. This is one of the reasons bridge experts often excel at Poker; play the opponents not the hand.