Against South's contract of three no-trump, from a pair game, West obediently led the spade eight, and most declarers sensibly held up the spade ace for one round, but then took the second spade trick.

The contract could not be made without bringing in the club suit, so some players took the simplistic approach of playing ace, and another club to West’s king, whereupon 10 tricks rolled in.

At other tables the more astute Wests unblocked their club king under declarer’s ace, appreciating that their partner must hold the jack. Otherwise, why had South not entered dummy and led toward his club jack, to keep East, the danger hand, off lead?

Another declarer crossed to dummy with a heart at trick three, and led the club five, under which East sleepily followed with the three. Declarer played the eight, and West was forced to win with the king, after which there was no defense.

The unluckiest declarer of all crossed to dummy and led a small club. East inserted the 10 (which suggested ownership of the jack), and when South played the ace, West unblocked the king. Now the contract had to fail.

There is no guaranteed route to success. Best is for South to lead toward the club queen at trick three, and West must duck his king. Declarer puts up the queen and leads a low club from dummy, on which East plays the jack (NOT the 10). Now South has to guess whether to duck or win the trick.

From the 2000 Spingold, Joey Silver of Canada found a nice line in defense.

He led a top club against four hearts, and his partner, Debbie Rosenberg, followed high. With dummy having a singleton, this was an extension of the Obvious Shift principle. Since a diamond would have been West’s logical switch, her encouragement in clubs showed no great interest in his switching to diamonds if he regained the lead.

Declarer won the club ace and deceptively returned the heart queen at trick two. Silver took the ace and accurately shifted to a spade. When declarer finessed, Debbie Rosenberg won her king and shifted to a diamond. Now declarer had no chance, since whatever he did, he would be left with two diamond losers.

At the other table West ducked declarer’s play of the heart queen, for fear of crashing the heart king in his partner’s hand. That allowed South to take the spade finesse next, with his endplay chances intact. East won the spade king and shifted to the diamond 10, but declarer could take this with the ace and eliminate the spades by ruffing out the suit. When West was thrown in with the heart ace, he had to offer a ruff and discard or give South a trick in either minor, while South still had a heart entry back to hand. (It is curious that the winning line for declarer and the winning line for the defense both involve playing spades at trick three.)

Defending against four hearts, West led the club king, then thoughtfully shifted to the spade jack, appreciating that he would need to set up winners for his side before declarer could establish the diamond suit for discards.

South played low from dummy and won his spade ace. It looked logical to draw trump next, then play a spade to the king, followed by another spade. East won the trick and exited with the spade nine, ruffed by declarer in dummy.

Declarer could now deduce that West had a singleton diamond and so played a low diamond from dummy. If West won the trick, he would have to concede a ruff-and-discard by leading a club, whereas if East rose with the diamond king he, would be the one endplayed.

Note that East might have exited with the fourth diamond instead of leading the fourth spade. Now to make the contract, declarer must duck this trick, which will leave West endplayed to give the ruff-sluff again. If declarer takes the diamond ace, then East will be able to get in again and cash his two winners.

The contract can be defeated only by an initial spade lead. (However, the play is quite complex if declarer wins the spade king, draws trump, then plays a club. The defenders must win and play a diamond, and when declarer takes the trick and plays a spade, East must go up with the queen to swallow his partner’s 10.).

The three little pigs came back from their bridge class, where they had been tested by a deal from "A Bridge to Inspired Declarer Play" by Julian Laderman (Master Point Press).

The Big Bad Wolf, who just happened to be in the vicinity, asked them if they had done well. The first little pig brought out the diagramed deal and said that it had caused him fits. Declaring four hearts on a spade lead, he had won in hand, drawn three rounds of trump, then played diamonds from the top. When diamonds did not break he was down like a stone (inappropriate, I know, for someone building his house from straw).

The second pig did better. He won the spade lead, took a heart finesse, then played three rounds of diamonds at once. Alas for him, the hand long in diamonds won the third round of the suit and led a fourth, promoting the heart king to the fourth trick for the defense. (There was still an inevitable heart and club to come.)

The Big Bad Wolf may have thought to himself, “I woodn’t have played the hand that way,” but he would never have uttered such a bad pun out loud.

The third little pig had grasped the theme. After winning the heart queen, he ducked a diamond. He could win the return, draw a second trump, then ruff the fourth diamond at his leisure.

Do you like the way North handled his cards in today's deal? I do. It is simple and straightforward, since North can reasonably expect to buy a decent five-card diamond suit. So long as his partner does not have significant wasted values in spades, slam should have good play. A slightly more prudent approach would be to jump to four spades at the second turn, as long as that promises specifically a singleton spade and not a void. If partner signs off in five diamonds, one can respect that approach.

Of course, today it turns out that South does have an almost wasted spade king and nothing in hearts — not to mention that neither clubs nor diamonds will behave as South might wish. And still the slam has decent play (if you can spot the winning line, which is not necessarily obvious).

The heart king goes to dummy’s ace, and declarer plays the diamond king, and a diamond to the ace. Next come the club ace, king, and queen, on which South throws a heart. A club ruff follows, and declarer next leads a diamond to the queen and takes the fifth club, discarding his last heart from hand.

In the four-card ending, dummy has a trump, a spade and two hearts, while South has three spades and a trump left. West has two spades and two hearts, and when declarer leads a spade to the 10, West must win but then cannot lead either major without conceding the rest.

Today's deal was played by the Canadian great Sam Gold in the 50s. Sam has just been inducted into the Canadian Bridge Hall of Fame for his services to the game in Montreal.

Have a look at today’s deal, and count the top tricks. It looks like 10 — five spades, three hearts and two aces — with an 11th trick looking to be something of a struggle. Sam was in six spades on an unfriendly diamond lead — let’s see how he set about making 12 tricks.

The diamond eight went to dummy’s ace. A diamond ruffed high let declarer lead the spade 10 to the jack, allowing another diamond to be ruffed high. Now came the spade six to the eight, and a third diamond ruff, denuding both opponents of the suit.

Gold led a heart to the king, and the spade nine drew the opponent’s last trump as Gold threw a club. The heart ace and queen disclosed the bad break in that suit, but Gold now calmly threw East in with his heart jack to lead away from his club king into dummy’s tenace. Contract made!

This is a perfect example of what the experts describe as a dummy reversal. Declarer ruffed three times in the long trump hand and drew trump from the short hand, turning five trump tricks into six. One of the requirements is decent trump spots in dummy and of course a 3-2 trump break (but that is heavily with the odds).

Two of the original ACBL Life Masters were players whose surnames differed by a single letter. We saw a deal earlier this month defended by Sam Fry; time, therefore, to credit Richard Frey, who was the fifth member of the Four Aces, the first team to take on Eli Culbertson. He collaborated with Howard Schenken in a daily column for over 30 years. Here is a deal that he defended expertly.

Against three no-trump, Frey (West) led the heart four. Declarer played low from dummy, and East won the trick with his king and returned the heart nine, declarer following first with the heart seven, then with the queen.

Declarer now attacked diamonds, and Frey could see that he would be able to win the diamond ace and clear hearts. But what were the chances that he would regain the lead with the spade ace before declarer had cashed nine tricks?

It is very easy to focus on your own hand and you own plans without considering what declarer might do to combat them. Here, Frey correctly concluded that he had little chance of success by clearing the hearts. Since he could also see the danger of ducking even one diamond trick if declarer had six clubs, he took his diamond ace at once and shifted to the spade jack. Since East had the spade king, with length, this ensured that the defenders could take three spade tricks and set the contract.

It is hard to sacrifice a trick voluntarily, and that is especially true when you appear to have been given a free finesse. But never say never, and today's deal is an example of when deception trumps other factors. The deal shows when you might rise with an ace unnecessarily to try to encourage a continuation of the suit led — even at the apparent cost of a trick.

Four hearts might well be the best game, but your auction strongly suggested that you had three hearts and five clubs, and North opted for the nine-card fit. In a sense you have done well to avoid three no-trump here in favor of a suit game, since a spade lead sinks you if the club finesse is wrong — but even so, isn’t five clubs equally doomed?

Not necessarily: West gives you a respite by leading a diamond. If you run this to your hand, you set up an irrelevant discard for a spade from dummy. However the defenders will know to shift to spades when in with the trump king.

A better and more deceptive approach is to win the diamond ace and take the club finesse. Unless East works out to discourage at trick one (and why should he?), West will probably continue diamonds, hoping for the spade switch from East, and he will be sorely disappointed. You now have time to draw trump and set up hearts to provide the discard that really matters, the spade from hand.

South was puzzled why his result of down one in four hearts had cost his team 10 IMPs. When prompted, North, who had stoically watched the play as dummy, took pains to explain.

Against four hearts West had led a top spade, and declarer won this in dummy, then took the heart finesse. It lost to the king and back came another spade, won in hand by South. Declarer drew trump in one further round then exited with the spade nine. His hope was that West held both minor-suit kings and would be endplayed. But West could exit safely in diamonds, and did so. Declarer ended one down, having lost a trick in each suit.

As North pointed out, if the trump finesse was right at trick two, it would still be right later on in the deal. But you may not want to take the finesse at all if other factors make it irrelevant.

The best play is to win the initial spade lead in hand, not in dummy, and play a club toward the queen. West must take the king or lose it, and will presumably return another spade. You can win this in dummy and cash the club queen.

Now you don’t take any chances. You play a trump to your ace, then cash the club ace and discard dummy’s losing spade. After that, you can draw the outstanding trumps and will have 10 tricks on top. Your only losers are one club, one diamond and one trump.