March 11th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority.
Henry David Thoreau
East |
North |
Neither |
♠ K J 8 6
♥ J 8 7 6
♦ A 10
♣ Q J 8 |
West |
East |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ 5
♦ K J 9 5 3 2
♣ 10 2 |
♠ Q 9 3
♥ Q 4 3
♦ Q 6
♣ K 9 7 6 4 |
South |
♠ 10 5
♥ A K 10 9 2
♦ 8 7 4
♣ A 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
3♦ |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
It is an old wives' tale that one should always lead majors, not minors, against auctions of this sort. First you decide if you have an obvious lead from length; if not, you compare suits of equal attraction, and only then does a tie go to the major. Here your clubs offer a far more attractive lead than your spades. Lead a low club rather than an honor, though.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 4 2
♥ A 7
♦ J 9 3
♣ J 10 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
March 10th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Are you familiar with a convention called "stolen bid"? What are the pluses and minuses of the convention, in which a double and all low-level calls act as transfers?
Gunsmith, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
"Stolen Bid" permits you to keep transfers in play when the opponents come in over your no-trump, an undeniable plus. You can, however, no longer use a takeout double — one of the more important hand-types. While responder at his first turn to speak can bid all the suits efficiently in either scenario, to my mind being able to transfer declarership is worth less than being able to make a negative double.
When you hold a balanced hand such as ♠ K-Q-3, ♥ K-10-8, ♦ J-6-3-2, ♣ A-8-5 do you think there is any argument to be made for opening one club as opposed to one diamond, reserving the one-diamond opening for less balanced hands?
Jumbotron, Rockford, Ill.
What you suggest requires a conventional agreement with your partner (and would make your one club and one diamond bids alertable). That said, yes, if you open one club with all minimum balanced hands, you get much more confidence in the one-diamond opening.
What exactly is a trial bid? When should you use it and how does it work?
Hoppity Bunny, Portland, Ore.
After you agree a suit in nonforcing fashion via a raise of opener's or responder's suit, a call in a new suit shows length and asks for help — typically with a three- or four-card suit to one top honor. It asks the hand that has raised to evaluate whether it is maximum or minimum for the auction thus far. You sign-off with a minimum or an unsuitable holding, and move to game with a maximum, or suitable holding in the critical suit.
|
My LHO opened one club on my left, and my partner doubled at favorable vulnerability. While I was wondering what to respond with ♠ K-J-9, ♥ J-2, ♦ Q-10-8-7, ♣ K-Q-6-4, my RHO bid one heart. There seemed to be a lot of high cards in the deck, but what would you recommend for me to do? Should I invite game or settle for a part-score in either diamonds or spades?
Lindy Hop, Grenada, Miss.
I agree that this looks like a partscore deal – since in situations where both opponents are bidding, partner probably has shape, not high cards. I'd bid either one no-trump or two diamonds — the former at pairs, the latter at teams.
Should you change your responses to Blackwood when the opponents intervene or double a four-no-trump call or the response to it? If so, what scheme do you use?
Fat Freddy, Durham, N.C.
When a four-no-trump call is doubled, I recommend you ignore it. With any other intervention below the trump suit, use double to show no key cards (or aces if playing regular Blackwood) and pass with one, then step responses thereafter. With higher intervention use double to show zero or two key-cards, pass for one key-card, and step responses with three or four cards.
|
March 9th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Such labored nothings, in so strange a style, Amaze the unlearned, and make the learned smile.
Alexander Pope
West |
North |
East-West |
♠ 6 5 3 2
♥ 8
♦ A Q
♣ J 9 8 6 5 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 7
♥ K J 5 4 2
♦ 10 8 3 2
♣ A 2 |
♠ A 4
♥ Q 9 6 3
♦ K 9 7 5
♣ Q 10 7 |
South |
♠ K Q J 10 8
♥ A 10 7
♦ J 6 4
♣ K 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♠7
Your partner's redouble sounds like an SOS redouble — "Help, get me out of here.". His likely holding is four spades and five or six hearts, and since you know spades is now the best strain, simply bid two spades rather than confuse the issue with further escape maneuvers. The rule here is that if you want to play a doubled contract, you don't need to redouble to get a good score.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 3 2
♥ 8
♦ A Q
♣ J 9 8 6 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
1 NT |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When other helpers fail, and comforts flee, Help of the helpless, O abide with me.
Henry Francis Lyte
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ J 10 4
♥ Q 5 3
♦ K Q 4
♣ Q 9 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 8 6 5 3
♥ A 9 7 6 2
♦ 8
♣ J 5 |
♠ 9 7 2
♥ K J 10 8
♦ 7 3
♣ K 10 7 4 |
South |
♠ A K
♥ 4
♦ A J 10 9 6 5 2
♣ A 8 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♦ |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♦8
Your hand may look as if it will play well at no-trump because it is so square, but the holes in all three of the side suits (and the soft cards) simply make it look like a hand without much future. With such square shape I'd simply raise to three hearts and not make a cue-bid raise of hearts. Whether partner has one, two, or three small diamonds, this hand won't be pulling its weight.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 4
♥ Q 5 3
♦ K Q 4
♣ Q 9 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♦ |
2♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
They say the honest newspaper-fellow who sits in the hall and takes down the names of the great ones who are admitted to the feasts, dies after a little time. He can't survive the glare of fashion long.
William Thackeray
South |
North |
Both |
♠ K
♥ J 8 7 5 2
♦ K 7 5
♣ J 10 9 7 |
West |
East |
♠ A 8 7 3
♥ 10 3
♦ Q J 9 6
♣ K Q 6 |
♠ Q 10 9 6 2
♥ K 9
♦ 10 4 2
♣ 5 4 3 |
South |
♠ J 5 4
♥ A Q 6 4
♦ A 8 3
♣ A 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♦Q
This boils down to a simple question; should you make a negative double with average values for the call, but little support for partner's suit and decent defense of the opponents' suit? The simple answer is that if your side has a heart fit, you might make game, so that it feels right to bid. Switch the red suits and I would pass, feeling that if I'm facing a balanced hand, our best plus-score will come on defense.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ J 8 7 5 2
♦ K 7 5
♣ J 10 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
To meet death one needs no letters of introduction.
Leo Tolstoy
North |
North |
Neither |
♠ 10 6 4 2
♥ A Q
♦ Q J 10 9 4
♣ K 7 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 8 7 5 3
♥ J 8 6
♦ K 6
♣ Q 5 3 |
♠ K 9
♥ 10 9 7 3
♦ A 7 3
♣ J 8 4 2 |
South |
♠ A J
♥ K 5 4 2
♦ 8 5 2
♣ A 10 9 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
Although you cannot be sure that your spade king is pulling its full weight, you certainly have enough to look for game here. The issue is whether to bid four hearts or simply raise to three hearts. (It surely cannot be right to consider no-trump here.) I believe your heart spots entitle you to bid game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9
♥ 10 9 7 3
♦ A 7 3
♣ J 8 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
2♠ |
? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Credulity is the man's weakness, but the child's strength.
Charles Lamb
South |
North |
Both |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ A 9 7 5
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ 8 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 7 6 3
♥ 10 6
♦ 9 7
♣ K J 10 4 |
♠ K 2
♥ J 8 4 3
♦ J 8 4 3
♣ 9 6 5 |
South |
♠ A 10 4
♥ K Q 2
♦ A K 5
♣ A Q 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠6
Your approach here may depend on the form of scoring and the vulnerability. I tend rarely to save at rubber bridge. At pairs or teams I think you should pass if vulnerable: a sacrifice rates to cost at least 500 (even if facing a decent hand such as six good diamonds and four clubs to the queen). Nonvulnerable I bid five diamonds first and count the cost later; let the opponents make the last mistake.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 5
♥ A 9 7 5
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♠ |
3♦ |
3♠ |
? |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
My soul, do not seek immortal life, but exhaust the realm of the possible.
Pindar
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 9 3
♥ K Q 8 7
♦ 7 3 2
♣ K 10 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 5
♥ 5 2
♦ A J 10 4
♣ Q 8 7 |
♠ K 7 6 2
♥ 6 3
♦ Q 9 8 6
♣ 9 6 4 |
South |
♠ A 8 4
♥ A J 10 9 4
♦ K 5
♣ A J 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠Q
Assuming West is a competent player, he has shown 16-17 and an unbalanced or semibalanced hand, so he must have club length. The choice is a passive spade lead or an active club lead, and since the clubs do not appear to be lying well for the opponents and they have no values to spare, I'd lead the spade seven.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6 5
♥ A 8 5
♦ 10 6
♣ Q 9 6 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
March 3rd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I assume you would pass when your RHO opens one diamond and you hold ♠ K-J-2, ♥ K-J-7-2, ♦ J-10-8-2, ♣ Q-9. If you do, your LHO passes and your partner doubles. Should you drive to game now, or invite — and in hearts or no-trump?
Looking for the Path, Bristol, Va.
You are certainly a bit too good for a two-heart call, but I'd be a little uncomfortable bidding one no-trump. Even though you are fine for values, for that call I'd be worried about having to give up too many tempos to set up the long suits. I certainly do not want to force to game here, so two hearts it is. Give me just a little more (maybe the spade queen for the jack), and I'd risk a two-diamond cuebid.
If you play a double of a no-trump (be it weak or strong) as penalties, how do you advocate continuing? And should your approach be consistent whether third hand runs from the double or not?
Boot Straps, Santa Fe, N.M.
A simple and effective way to bid is to assume that after you double one no-trump, you rescue yourself by using Stayman and transfers. Equally, if the opponents run, you can play the same methods as you would if you had opened one no-trump and the opponents had overcalled.
When your partner opens one spade, would you prefer to force to game with a call of two clubs or would you bid one no-trump, holding ♠ 4-2, ♥ Q-J-9-2, ♦ Q-2, ♣ A-Q-5-4-3? Is your choice affected by whether the no-trump call is forcing, semiforcing, or indeed nonforcing?
Flavor of the Month, Houston, Texas
|
I would respond with one no-trump (and be entirely happy with that choice, though I would prefer it to be forcing). The hand is not worth a game-force, because of the absence of fit, and I think I will get my chance to limit the hand at the next turn. I might miss a game if partner can pass with a balanced 14-count or so, but I'll take my chances on that.
What is a cuebid? I see the word used to cover many different situations — sometimes in slam-going auctions, sometimes in auctions that are not even game-forcing!
Ace Ventura, Duluth, Minn.
You make a good point: These days players use the term in many disparate ways. After partner opens or overcalls, when you bid the opponents' suit at your first turn to speak, it is generally used to mean a value-showing raise of the opponents' suit. Later in the auction, the call tends to ask your partner if he has that suit stopped for no-trump purposes. Finally, a cuebid above three no-trump shows a control in that suit for slam purposes. No wonder you are confused!
What criteria do I follow in deciding whether to open this hand at the one-level or two-level: ♠ 9, ♥ K-J-7-4-3-2, ♦ Q-9-8-4, ♣ A-10? Would you consider passing and backing in later?
Level-Headed, Cartersville, Ga.
There is no moderate hand with a decent six-card suit that should not be opened either at the one- or two-level. (There is no gap between the ranges.) If I'm vulnerable, this looks like a two-heart opening bid; if I'm nonvulnerable, in first seat my diamond spots persuade me to open one heart. I suppose that in second seat I could go either way.
|
March 2nd, 2013 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Future shock is the shattering stress and disorientation that we induce in individuals by subjecting them to too much change in too short a time.
Alvin Toffler
West |
North |
Neither |
♠ 10 9 6 5 3
♥ A
♦ A K 8 5
♣ K 8 7 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K J 10 7 4 3
♦ Q 7 4 3
♣ 5 4 2 |
♠ Q J 4 2
♥ 8 5
♦ J 10 6
♣ A Q 6 3 |
South |
♠ A K 8 7
♥ Q 9 6 2
♦ 9 2
♣ J 10 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦3
Since a direct call of two hearts by your partner would be natural and forcing, you should assume he has long hearts (typically six) and not enough values to follow an invitational sequence to game. Typically, you would expect about an eight-count here, so it feels best to pass (albeit reluctantly) on the grounds that anything else may be worse.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 6 5 3
♥ A
♦ A K 8 5
♣ K 8 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
When we read books or articles about suit combinations, they generally assume that the suit is in isolation — i.e., that the only consideration is the actual odds in the single combination. However, in real life there are often other things to take into account.
For example, here West leads the diamond six against four hearts. How would you plan the play?
The first decision is whether or not to win the first diamond, and that depends on whether you think West might have a seven-card diamond suit. The rule of 11 says no – but that is not the full story. You don’t want to duck the first diamond and run into a club shift that may help the defenders build a trick in that suit.
After you win the diamond ace, the percentage play in isolation in hearts is to start by cashing the ace. With no opposition bidding, you would then cash the king, but in the face of West’s pre-empt you may prefer to take a finesse against East’s queen. The problem is that you have no easy way back to dummy.
Even if you guess correctly in spades, the defenders may be able to take the spade ace and play two more rounds of diamonds, generating a trump loser for you. Now you will need something miraculous in the black suits to avoid a fourth loser.
After you win trick one, it is surely better to take a first-round heart finesse, playing East to have queen-third or queen-fourth of trumps from the outset.