January 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
At matchpoints I held ♠ K-10-8-7, ♥ —, ♦ A, ♣ A-J-10-9-8-6-4-3. I opened one club, and my LHO overcalled one diamond. Now my partner made a free bid of one spade and I could not think of any call except the Grand Slam Force, getting us to a somewhat fortunate seven spades. Are there any conventions that agree on responder's suit and ask about the holding in opener's suit?
Sharp Shooter, Torrance, Calif.
An immediate jump by you to four diamonds, showing spade support and first-round diamond control, would be one possibility. There is no artificial call to show your hand, but a convention called Exclusion Blackwood (asking for aces while showing a void) might work here. In this case a bid of five hearts would do the trick. However, you would need better clubs than this, I think.
Do all expert partnerships use count and suit-preference as well as, or instead of, encouraging/discouraging signals? And if so, how does one decide when one signal should apply as opposed to the other?
Signal Corps, Kansas City, Mo.
Most experts signal encouragement first, but they may switch to a count signal if the signaler's attitude is already defined by who is going to win the trick. More complex, though, is a situation where a switch appears necessary, or the suit could not logically be continued, even on the second or third round,, many players will then switch to suit-preference. Suit-preference in the trump suit is often more critical than count.
I am seeing more and more duplicate players make use of weak jump overcalls or even responses, but I am not a fan. Are there any positions or vulnerabilities where I can tell my partners that strong jump overcalls make more sense than weak jumps?
Flex Those Pecs, Jackson, Tenn.
In balancing seat one should play jump overcalls as intermediate, not weak, since with a weak hand one would simply pass. It is also clearly best to use strong jump overcalls over your opponents' weak-two bids. More controversially, I would argue that at unfavorable vulnerability all jump overcalls of your opponents' opening bids should be closer to intermediate than weak.
|
Playing Swiss Teams, vulnerable against not, I held I held ♠ A-8-7-3, ♥ 4, ♦ Q-J-10-3, ♣ 10-9-5-4. My partner opened one heart and raised my response of one spade to two. How close would you consider this hand to be to a try for game? I passed and not only found that game was respectable, but that it was bid in the other room. My partner had 15 HCP including four spades, but a singleton diamond king.
Fading in the Stretch, Maplewood, N.J.
You are not close to a game-try, because of your singleton heart and having only four spades. It is rare that any hand will gave you good play for game unless partner has nothing in hearts, or just the ace. By the way, I'd bid three spades with partner's hand — singleton diamond king notwithstanding.
When holding a 10-count and three trumps in response to a one-spade opening bid, should one treat the hand as a limit-raise via a forcing no-trump, or as a constructive raise to two? The hand that caused me concern was ♠ A-10-2, ♥ K-10-6, ♦ K-8-4-3-2, ♣ 9-4.
Ready for Battle, Corpus Christi, Texas
This is an exceptional 10-count, not just because it is all aces and kings, but because of the five-card suit and the potentially useful trump and heart intermediates. I would treat this hand as a limit-raise, but take away the fifth diamond and make it a small club, and I would be happy to raise one spade to two.
|
January 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
You write with ease to show your breeding, But easy writing’s curst hard reading.
Richard Brinsley Sheridan
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 5 4
♥ K Q 10 6 2
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 3
♥ 9
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ A Q 7 4 |
♠ K Q 9 2
♥ J 3
♦ J
♣ K J 10 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6
♥ A 8 7 5 4
♦ A 9 7 4
♣ 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♥9
Your diamond length argues for a pass here. Your partner could have raised hearts with three if he was worried about diamonds. Therefore, you should assume that if you play hearts, you rate to be in at best a 5-2 fit, with diamond ruffs threatening you. Your partner hasn't guaranteed club length, but you should assume staying low in one no-trump is likely to be a sensible option.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ K Q 10 6 2
♦ K 5 3 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I court others in verse: but I love thee in prose: And they have my whimsies, but thou hast my heart.
Matthew Prior
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 2
♥ J 8 7 6
♦ 10 4
♣ A 9 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ Q 10 5 4 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ J 4 2 |
♠ Q J 9 7 3
♥ 9 3
♦ A Q 7 6 3
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8 5
♥ A K
♦ J 8 2
♣ K Q 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦5
When the opponents intervene over Stayman, double from both sides of the table should be penalty, and this is no exception. You don't have to get overly involved here; pass and await developments — and expect them to be gory.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 2
♥ J 8 7 6
♦ 10 4
♣ A 9 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
2♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Our dilemma is that we hate change and love it at the same time; what we really want is for things to remain the same but get better.
Sydney Harris
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 2
♥ Q 5
♦ J 10 7 4
♣ Q J 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ J 8 4 3 2
♦ K 8 3
♣ 10 8 7 |
♠ A J 8 6
♥ 10 7 6
♦ 9 6 5 2
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 7 4 3
♥ A K 9
♦ A Q
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♠* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♥** |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Slam try with…
**Five clubs and four diamonds
♥3
It might be possible to find a more sophisticated approach, but in my opinion there is a lot to be said for simply jumping to six diamonds. If you want to use an ace-asking bid en route, that is fine. But unless you are playing with a very wild pre-empter, you rate to have 12 top tricks, and even if you are off two spade winners, the defenders may have to cash them.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 4 3
♥ A K 9
♦ A Q
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Neither the believer nor the atheist is completely satisfied with appearances.
Andre Malraux
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ J 6 3
♥ A Q J
♦ A 8 7 2
♣ 10 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 9 8 7 5 4
♦ 4
♣ A 9 5 3 |
♠ A 10 5 2
♥ K 3 2
♦ Q 10 5 3
♣ 8 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7
♥ 10 6
♦ K J 9 6
♣ K Q J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥9
The old-fashioned textbooks (which I read, and in some cases wrote!) used to advocate passing over minor-suit openings unless you had perfect shape or extra values. Take that advice with a pinch of salt. Specifically, facing an unpassed partner, there is no great risk in doubling one club when your values are in the side-suits. Switch the hearts and clubs, and I would pass rather than double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 3
♥ A Q J
♦ A 8 7 2
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Let other pens dwell on guilt and misery.
Jane Austen
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3 2
♥ 10 9 7 2
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K Q 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10
♥ Q 6 5 4 3
♦ 5
♣ 7 6 4 3 |
♠ 4
♥ K J 8
♦ Q J 10 9 4 3
♣ A J 8 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 8 7 6 5
♥ A
♦ A K 2
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦5
The first issue here is how high you want to push the opponents; the second is what you want partner to lead if East ends up declarer in a spade or diamond game, or even slam. You should get to the four-level as fast as possible to take away space from your opponents, and you want a club lead. A jump to four clubs should do the trick; it shows the heart fit and a club suit you are happy to have led.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3 2
♥ 10 9 7 2
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 22 Comments
Many things are not as they seem: The worst things in life never are.
Jim Butcher
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 3
♥ A J 5
♦ A 9 4
♣ A K J 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ K 10 8 7 2
♦ Q J 7 5
♣ 5 4 |
♠ A K Q 10 7
♥ 9 6 3
♦ 8 2
♣ Q 3 2 |
| South |
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ Q 4
♦ K 10 6 3
♣ 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥7
Before I start, I warn you that experts disagree on what you are expected to do here. But partner's double of three no-trump is surely based on the desire for a lead other than hearts. (If he wanted you to lead hearts, he would simply have passed, expecting you to lead his suit.) My guess is he has hearts and good clubs, so I would lead a club.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4 2
♥ 9 7 3
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
January 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
We play inverted minor-suit raises, so when I opened one diamond and my partner raised to two, I was looking for a slam, holding ♠ K-Q-7, ♥ A-9-4, ♦ A-K-10-3, ♣ Q-5-4. Since two no-trump would have been nonforcing, what would you recommend? And what would a jump to three no-trump show?
Bonanza, Bellingham, Wash.
A jump to three no-trump would show extra values (typically 18-19) with three diamonds, or a bad four-card suit in a balanced hand. I think I might start with two spades to emphasize where my values lie. Now my partner will either limit his hand with a call of three diamonds or with two no-trump. If he does not, we will go to at least a small slam.
If we are playing Two-Over-One Game-Forcing, what are the suit requirements to open a suit and then jump in it over a two-level response? Does it show extras as well as a good suit?
Hop, Skip, and Jump, Panama City, Fla.
It is normal to play that a jump in a forcing auction shows a semi-solid suit or better (missing at most one of the top two honors) but more than a minimum. So, assuming I held six spades to the king-queen-jack, I would open one spade, then rebid three spades over two clubs with 15HCP or more. With a slightly weaker suit or fewer HCP, two spades would be enough.
Is there a simple mathematical formula for determining how the five remaining cards should split when you have an eight-card trump suit? Can this be extrapolated to give a general rule?
Lex Luther, Atlanta, Ga.
The mathematics for remembering the rule about how the missing cards will split is basically as follows: It is a toss-up with two cards missing, but for any other even number of missing cards, they are somewhat less likely to split evenly than one away from evenly. So a 3-1 break is rather more likely than 2-2; a 4-2 than 3-3. With an odd number of cards missing, they are considerably more likely (use two-thirds as a guideline) to split as evenly as possible.
|
I often have a problem as responder at my second turn when I have a borderline invitation and no clear fit. For example, in an unopposed auction such as one club – one diamond – one spade, how should I advance as responder with ♠ K-7-4, ♥ 9-5-2, ♦ K-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-10-2?
Sundown, Newark, N.J.
A raise to two spades with three trumps and a balanced hand feels wrong to me. (Change the heart two to the diamond two and I would be more sympathetic to that action.) At pairs I'd rebid one no-trump; at teams I'd rebid two clubs if the one-spade call promises at least four clubs, and that the opener would rebid one no-trump with a balanced hand.
In what position or at what vulnerability is it acceptable to open a three-level pre-empt with a six-card suit? How does suit quality or the form of scoring affect that decision?
Booster, Madison, Wis.
You can occasionally open three clubs with six clubs (since there is no other convenient pre-empt). In third seat or at favorable vulnerability, the rules about seven-card suits are often relaxed. This would also apply to a three-diamond opening if you play Flannery. The best suits to bend the rules on are good six-carders without the ace. Having a little side-suit shape (such as a four-card minor) is certainly a plus.
|
January 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
No one can build his security upon the nobleness of another person.
Willa Cather
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 8
♥ A K 8 3
♦ Q 10 6
♣ A 10 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 4 3
♥ 5 2
♦ J 7 4
♣ Q 7 6 5 |
♠ 5 2
♥ Q J 10 9 7
♦ A K
♣ K J 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9
♥ 6 4
♦ 9 8 5 3 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
One can make a case for rebidding one no-trump to get across the basic nature of the hand (minimum and balanced), but in fact the intermediates in the long suits argue for the simple rebid in clubs. Whatever anyone tells you, a hand with a 5-4-2-2 pattern is better off for play in a suit than in no-trump, all things being equal.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ Q J 10 9 7
♦ A K
♣ K J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
But with the morning cool repentance came.
Sir Walter Scott
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 10 4 3
♥ A K 8 3
♦ 8 4
♣ 10 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 6 4
♦ A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4 |
♠ A 9 7 6
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ 5 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 5 2
♥ J 7
♦ K Q 9 6
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
All pass |
♣K
To get both your suits into play, bid four no-trump now. This cannot be Blackwood facing a passed partner. Instead, it is an extension of the unusual no-trump, indicating 6-5 or 7-5 in the minors, letting partner pick where he wants to play.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ 6 4
♦ A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In the round robin of the U.S. trials to select the international squad to go to Bali for the 2013 Bermuda Bowl, the following declarer-play problem came up. It was not accurately solved by any of the participants who were confronted with it.
Say you reach four hearts and receive the lead of the heart nine. It looks best to win the trick in dummy and start to eliminate the club suit by leading a low one from the board, which is won by East’s 10. East now exits with the diamond jack. Since the contract is only in jeopardy if diamonds do not break, it looks simple enough to win the diamond ace, trump a club, and lead the heart queen to the ace.
Declarer should then continue to prepare for the endplay he might need if diamonds do not cooperate. Best is to play the spade six from hand, and duck when West plays his seven. West is allowed to hold the trick and exits with the diamond queen, bringing the bad break to light. Declarer wins his king, plays a spade to the ace, crosses to dummy with another heart, and plays the spade jack, discarding a diamond from hand.
Poor East must win the trick and now has no choice but to lead a black suit. That gives declarer a ruff and sluff, which can be trumped in dummy as declarer discards his last diamond loser — making four!