March 31st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
'If everybody minded their own business,' said the Duchess in a hoarse growl, 'the world would go round a deal faster than it does.'
Lewis Carroll
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ Q 8 6 5 2
♦ K J 10 8 6 3
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ 10 3
♦ A Q 9 7 4 2
♣ K 9 8 |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ A K J 9 7 4
♦ 5
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 9 8 3
♥ —
♦ —
♣ Q J 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| 4♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥10
It looks clear to lead a club, but which one is best? In my book leading a small club rates to protect against more positions (such as those where partner has a doubleton honor) than leading a top club, which tends to gain only when declarer or dummy has a doubleton club jack and partner has the 10.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ J 4
♦ K 8 5
♣ K Q 9 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 16th, 2014
|
Playing in a Regional Tournament, my left-hand opponent opened a weak two diamonds, which was passed around to me in fourth seat. I usually am an aggressive bidder, especially through the two-level, especially with favorable vulnerability. Holding nine or 10 points with five hearts to the queen-jack, I threw in a two-heart call. My partner raised to three, and we went down three tricks — which was one too many. I was told not to overcall unless I had close to opening values. Do you agree?
Nebuchadnezzar, Charlottesville, Va.
A balancing action at the one-level may start at nine, while at the two-level you need a little more. At the three-level I'd expect close to a full opener. The more shape you have, the fewer HCP you need. It sounds as if you were pushing the boat out — but sometimes your ship will come in.
How do you calculate the odds when you have 10 trumps missing the king and two small ones between playing for the drop and finessing?
Harry the Horse, Jackson, Miss.
When you lead toward the ace and an opponent follows small, he either has king-third, king-doubleton or small doubleton — if he has a singleton you are doomed whatever you do. The chance of a 3-0 break (on either side) is about 25 percent. So finessing wins for two of the 2-1 breaks plus the 3-0 split, and loses to one of the 2-1 breaks. That clearly makes the finesse the indicated play.
After your LHO deals and opens one heart and is raised pre-emptively to four, what is the best current practice for fourth hand? Should a double be takeout? Should it guarantee four spades, or is the double optional — or even penalties? How does best practice differ when the major suit opened was spades?
Searching, Midland, Mich.
|
It is best to play a double for takeout (without reference to the holding in the unbid major here). A balanced hand has to pass and possibly give up on the chance of what may be a lucrative penalty. Responder removes whenever he has a lot of shape or when he expects to make his contract, but passes with weak balanced hands. With a two-suited hand, you can overcall four no-trump; partner will assume you have the minors, but over a raise to four spades, the call might show any two suits.
How would you recommend dealing with intervention to the Jacoby two-no-trump response of one of a major, which shows game-forcing values and a trump fit?
Caught Short, Houston, Texas
Play a double as discouraging here, typically weak length in their suit, while pass is balanced, nothing to say. Suit bids are natural, repeating your own suit is extras (either extra length or HCP without shortage in the opponents' suit), while three no-trump shows a singleton in their suit, and a cue-bid shows first-round control. A jump to game sounds like six trumps and a minimum hand.
I did not like my partner's action on the following hand (and I'm hoping you can make my point for me). With ♠ A-J-7-5-2, ♥ J-4, ♦ Q-10-5, ♣ Q-4-3, he heard me pass, with a one diamond opening to his right. He bid one spade and now walked into a reopening double and penalty pass. When the smoke had cleared, he was down 800, and we had a matchpoint zero. Was he wrong to overcall with such a weak hand and suit?
Unhappy Camper, Monterey, Calif.
Alas, I suspect your zero came because your opponents judged to defend, and did so accurately, rather than because of a mistake by your partner. I might be stretching, but I'd venture no expert in today's game would seriously think about passing here. Conversely, switch the black suits, and the hand would not be worth a two-level overcall.
|
March 29th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Those who can't do, teach. And those who can't teach, teach gym.
Woody Allen
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A Q J 3
♥ Q J 5 4
♦ 9 6 2
♣ J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ K 6
♦ A 4
♣ A 10 8 7 6 2 |
♠ 10 4 2
♥ 9 7
♦ Q J 10 8 3
♣ Q 9 4 |
| South |
♠ K 7 6
♥ A 10 8 3 2
♦ K 7 5
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
You have a number of palatable choices, namely raising spades, repeating clubs, or bidding one no-trump. With only one diamond stopper, bidding no-trump feels wrong. Raising spades with three small cards is also not ideal, and the simple rebid in my own suit is not attractive with such weak clubs. I'll bid two spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 5
♥ K 6
♦ A 4
♣ A 10 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♦ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 28th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 14th, 2014
He has no hope who never had a fear.
Thomas Cowper
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 8 3
♥ A 4
♦ K Q J 7 2
♣ K J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4 2
♥ 9 8 3 2
♦ 10 6
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ J 7 6
♥ J 6
♦ A 9 8 5 4
♣ Q 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9
♥ K Q 10 7 5
♦ 3
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠2
The "impossible" two-spade call shows a good club raise, better than a direct raise to three clubs. With a minimum hand in terms of shape and high cards, you should simply revert to three clubs and let partner bid on if he still has unexpected extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9
♥ K Q 10 7 5
♦ 3
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I love fools' experiments. I am always making them.
Charles Darwin
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 7 6 3
♥ K Q 9 5
♦ 3
♣ K 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 9
♥ 2
♦ 10 9 8 6 2
♣ Q 5 |
♠ 2
♥ 7 3
♦ Q J 7 5 4
♣ J 10 9 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5 4
♥ A J 10 8 6 4
♦ A K
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
Do not get carried away by the four trumps and singleton. You have no high cards in partner's suits and soft cards in his likely shortages. A raise to two spades is certainly not an underbid, though you can hardly do less, but I would make the same call if the spade eight were the queen.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6 3
♥ K Q 9 5
♦ 3
♣ K 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Luck has a way of evaporating when you lean on it.
Brandon Mull
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J
♥ Q J
♦ Q J 7 6 3
♣ 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 2
♥ 7 5 3
♦ K 9 4
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
♠ K 10 4 3
♥ 8 6 4 2
♦ 10 8 5
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 7 5
♥ A K 10 9
♦ A 2
♣ A K Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♣10
The likely final contract rates to be three no-trump or four spades. (Slam is almost out of the picture once partner cannot do more at his second turn.) But there is no need to rush — cue-bid three diamonds, planning to bid no-trump at your next turn and let partner have a say in the final contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 5
♥ A K 10 9
♦ A 2
♣ A K Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
In baiting a mousetrap with cheese, always leave room for the mouse.
Saki (H.H. Munro)
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 4 2
♥ A Q 7 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ A 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7
♥ 9 2
♦ Q 7 5 4
♣ K Q J 6 2 |
♠ 6 5 3
♥ 10 8 4
♦ 10 9 3
♣ 10 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10
♥ K J 5 3
♦ A J 8
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
6♦ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Opinions are sharply divided on whether it works out best in the long run to escape from one no-trump doubled or to sit it out and hope partner can defeat it. My view is that if vulnerable, I sit for it; and if nonvulnerable, I run. A separate issue is whether to play that one should bid naturally here or use Stayman and transfers. Both approaches are reasonable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 3
♥ 10 8 4
♦ 10 9 3
♣ 10 9 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
There is no royal road to geometry.
Euclid
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 7
♥ Q 7 4
♦ Q 10 4 3
♣ A J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 4 3
♥ 8 5
♦ 2
♣ Q 9 7 5 3 |
♠ 5 2
♥ 6 3 2
♦ J 8 6 5
♣ K 10 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6
♥ A K J 10 9
♦ A K 9 7
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♦ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♦ |
Pass |
7♥ |
All pass |
♠J
Dummy rates to have a near Yarborough and you have no stand-out lead, so you may have to decide if your personal philosophy argues for aggression or passivity. At one end of the spectrum is the club lead; I'll vote against that on the grounds that the risk of surrendering a trick unnecessarily is too high. At the other end is the choice of majors; I have a slight preference for hearts over spades.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 4
♥ J 4 3
♦ A J 4
♣ K J 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 9th, 2014
|
Last week I held ♠ 5-4-3, ♥ 10-7-6-5-4-3, ♦ J-9-3-2, ♣ —. My partner opened two no-trump, and I transferred to hearts, then guessed to pass the response of three hearts. My partner had four trumps and no wasted values in clubs, so we finished up with an embarrassing 12 tricks. Who was unreasonably pessimistic here?
Missed the Boat, Trenton, N.J.
With a six-card suit, it is by no means clear to bid game, but the void would make me do it. I wonder, though, could your partner have jumped to game over the transfer? Normally one does so with four trumps, unless the hand has exceptionally sterile shape in the side-suits or is low in controls.
In second seat I was dealt ♠ J-10-3, ♥ Q-5, ♦ A-Q-9-5, ♣ A-K-Q-3. Before I could open the bidding I heard my RHO produce a weak two-spade bid. We were at unfavorable vulnerability and I had no idea what to bid. What would your thoughts be?
Eager for Action, Galveston, Texas
You may not overcall in a minor with only four pieces, so what does that leave? Doubling works out fine if partner passes or bids a minor. However, if he bids hearts, you may regret having acted. Since a two-no-trump call shows 15-18 and a spade stopper, you are not lying by that much if you make that call — are you? Given that East is relatively unlikely to have solid spades at this vulnerability, I'd definitely opt for that route.
I enjoy your bridge problems regularly run in the local paper, but I don't get the paper that often. Is there a book out that has a bunch of these little nuggets all bound together? Where might I get it?
Bookworm, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Are you an internet person? Try bridgeblogging.com. The column is posted 15 days after publication there. One of these days I will get around to publishing the columns in book form, I suppose.
|
Last night I opened one no-trump in second seat with ♠ 9-7-3, ♥ A-K-Q-10, ♦ 6-5, ♣ A-Q-7-4 and found myself defending four spades doubled, which we could not beat. Was my initial action wrong, with two open suits?
Robbing Peter, Janesville, Wis.
You may not like the results springing from your initial action, but what are the choices here? If you open one club, you'd have no rebid over a one-spade response. You could try an enterprising one-heart opening (promising five) and plan to rebid two clubs, I suppose. But it looks simplest and best to open one no-trump and hope partner doesn't drive to game with two small diamonds. If you could make partner declare no-trump, that might be best; but you play them better than he does!
I faced a conundrum when my partner opened one heart and jumped to three hearts over my two-club response. (I held ♠ Q-5, ♥ J-3, ♦ Q-6-5, ♣ A-K-Q-J-7-4. I guessed to use Blackwood and drove to slam over the response that showed three key cards. Alas, the defenders found the diamond lead away from the king, allowing them to cash the first two tricks. My partner had seven solid hearts and jack-fourth of diamonds along with the spade ace. What should we have done?
Shooting the Moon, Bellingham, Wash.
Don't use Blackwood when you do not know what to do over the response. It is ill-advised to use Blackwood with weak holdings in an unbid suit since, if you are missing a keycard, you will have no idea whether the slam is making, or missing the first two tricks. On the auction you had, you are clearly close to slam in terms of high-card points, but if three hearts sets trump, then maybe a cue-bid of four clubs is right. Partner will presumably bid four spades, and then you will sign off in five hearts.
|
March 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
One hope is too like despair For prudence to smother.
Percy Bysshe Shelley
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 4 2
♣ A Q 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 2
♥ J 8 5 4 3
♦ 8 5
♣ 10 7 4 |
♠ A J 6 4 3
♥ Q
♦ A J 9 7
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q
♥ 10 9 7 2
♦ K Q 10 6 3
♣ K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♠2
Every partnership playing negative doubles should have a firm agreement that when relatively short in the opponents' suit, one is obligated to reopen with a double — unless the opponents' tempo has made it clear that it is their hand, not yours. On this auction, partner is surely a favorite to hold a penalty double of diamonds, isn't he? So double now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 4 2
♣ A Q 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal offers an intriguing red herring, but if you focus on the essentials, you will not get it wrong.
As South you should jump to four spades over the opponents’ opening bid of one heart. Yes, you might buy short spades and long clubs opposite, but even if you do, your spades are almost self-supporting, and playing a minor takes you up a level. Additionally, you give far less information away with an auction of this sort than you do if you start with an action such as a Michaels Cue-bid.
Suppose you achieve your target — being doubled in four spades. Dummy may not offer quite as much as you had hoped for, but you ruff the opening lead and play the club 10 from hand, which West wins. That player continues with a second heart, and you ruff away East’s jack. Now what?
You must avoid the Greek gift of playing to ruff a club in dummy. If you do so, you will then have to shorten your trumps to get back to hand, and you will find that you will have to surrender trump control — and with it, the contract.
Better is to ignore the club ruff and simply to play the spade ace and jack. The defense will do best to win and shorten you again, but you can draw the last trump and then knock out the club ace, making your contract when that suits breaks 3-3 and spades are 3-2.