Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 12th, 2014

At matchpoints I held ♠ K-10-8-7,  —,  A, ♣ A-J-10-9-8-6-4-3. I opened one club, and my LHO overcalled one diamond. Now my partner made a free bid of one spade and I could not think of any call except the Grand Slam Force, getting us to a somewhat fortunate seven spades. Are there any conventions that agree on responder's suit and ask about the holding in opener's suit?

Sharp Shooter, Torrance, Calif.

An immediate jump by you to four diamonds, showing spade support and first-round diamond control, would be one possibility. There is no artificial call to show your hand, but a convention called Exclusion Blackwood (asking for aces while showing a void) might work here. In this case a bid of five hearts would do the trick. However, you would need better clubs than this, I think.

Do all expert partnerships use count and suit-preference as well as, or instead of, encouraging/discouraging signals? And if so, how does one decide when one signal should apply as opposed to the other?

Signal Corps, Kansas City, Mo.

Most experts signal encouragement first, but they may switch to a count signal if the signaler's attitude is already defined by who is going to win the trick. More complex, though, is a situation where a switch appears necessary, or the suit could not logically be continued, even on the second or third round,, many players will then switch to suit-preference. Suit-preference in the trump suit is often more critical than count.

I am seeing more and more duplicate players make use of weak jump overcalls or even responses, but I am not a fan. Are there any positions or vulnerabilities where I can tell my partners that strong jump overcalls make more sense than weak jumps?

Flex Those Pecs, Jackson, Tenn.

In balancing seat one should play jump overcalls as intermediate, not weak, since with a weak hand one would simply pass. It is also clearly best to use strong jump overcalls over your opponents' weak-two bids. More controversially, I would argue that at unfavorable vulnerability all jump overcalls of your opponents' opening bids should be closer to intermediate than weak.

Playing Swiss Teams, vulnerable against not, I held I held ♠ A-8-7-3,  4,  Q-J-10-3, ♣ 10-9-5-4. My partner opened one heart and raised my response of one spade to two. How close would you consider this hand to be to a try for game? I passed and not only found that game was respectable, but that it was bid in the other room. My partner had 15 HCP including four spades, but a singleton diamond king.

Fading in the Stretch, Maplewood, N.J.

You are not close to a game-try, because of your singleton heart and having only four spades. It is rare that any hand will gave you good play for game unless partner has nothing in hearts, or just the ace. By the way, I'd bid three spades with partner's hand — singleton diamond king notwithstanding.

When holding a 10-count and three trumps in response to a one-spade opening bid, should one treat the hand as a limit-raise via a forcing no-trump, or as a constructive raise to two? The hand that caused me concern was ♠ A-10-2,  K-10-6,  K-8-4-3-2, ♣ 9-4.

Ready for Battle, Corpus Christi, Texas

This is an exceptional 10-count, not just because it is all aces and kings, but because of the five-card suit and the potentially useful trump and heart intermediates. I would treat this hand as a limit-raise, but take away the fifth diamond and make it a small club, and I would be happy to raise one spade to two.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, January 11th, 2014

You write with ease to show your breeding,
But easy writing’s curst hard reading.

Richard Brinsley Sheridan


South North
Neither ♠ J 5 4
 K Q 10 6 2
 K 5 3 2
♣ 3
West East
♠ 10 8 7 3
 9
 Q 10 8 6
♣ A Q 7 4
♠ K Q 9 2
 J 3
 J
♣ K J 10 6 5 2
South
♠ A 6
 A 8 7 5 4
 A 9 7 4
♣ 9 8
South West North East
1 Pass 4 All pass

9

In the round robin of the U.S. trials to select the international squad to go to Bali for the 2013 Bermuda Bowl, the following declarer-play problem came up. It was not accurately solved by any of the participants who were confronted with it.

Say you reach four hearts and receive the lead of the heart nine. It looks best to win the trick in dummy and start to eliminate the club suit by leading a low one from the board, which is won by East’s 10. East now exits with the diamond jack. Since the contract is only in jeopardy if diamonds do not break, it looks simple enough to win the diamond ace, trump a club, and lead the heart queen to the ace.

Declarer should then continue to prepare for the endplay he might need if diamonds do not cooperate. Best is to play the spade six from hand, and duck when West plays his seven. West is allowed to hold the trick and exits with the diamond queen, bringing the bad break to light. Declarer wins his king, plays a spade to the ace, crosses to dummy with another heart, and plays the spade jack, discarding a diamond from hand.

Poor East must win the trick and now has no choice but to lead a black suit. That gives declarer a ruff and sluff, which can be trumped in dummy as declarer discards his last diamond loser — making four!


Your diamond length argues for a pass here. Your partner could have raised hearts with three if he was worried about diamonds. Therefore, you should assume that if you play hearts, you rate to be in at best a 5-2 fit, with diamond ruffs threatening you. Your partner hasn't guaranteed club length, but you should assume staying low in one no-trump is likely to be a sensible option.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 5 4
 K Q 10 6 2
 K 5 3 2
♣ 3
South West North East
1♣ 1
1 Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 10th, 2014

I court others in verse: but I love thee in prose:
And they have my whimsies, but thou hast my heart.

Matthew Prior


South North
East-West ♠ A 2
 J 8 7 6
 10 4
♣ A 9 7 5 3
West East
♠ 6 4
 Q 10 5 4 2
 K 9 5
♣ J 4 2
♠ Q J 9 7 3
 9 3
 A Q 7 6 3
♣ 10
South
♠ K 10 8 5
 A K
 J 8 2
♣ K Q 8 6
South West North East
1 NT Pass 2♣ Pass
2♠ Pass 3 NT All pass

5

The most straightforward hands sometimes offer a chance for whimsy. In this deal from last year's trials for the national squad to go to Bali, most North-South pairs ended up in three no-trump, here after a strong no-trump by South. If a diamond is led, the defense will surely take the first five tricks, but on any other lead, the contract rolls home.

However, declarer has a curious resource if the diamond seven and eight are interchanged between the South and East hands to produce the diagram as shown. (In real life those cards were switched). Now, when West leads the diamond five to East’s queen — a much better play than the ace at the first trick if partner has jack-third in diamonds — South follows with the deuce. East returns the diamond six and South imaginatively follows with the JACK!

West wins the king perforce, and returns his remaining diamond, the nine. If West started with an original K-9-8-5, East must duck now to avoid blocking the suit and taking only four tricks. On the other hand, if West started with K-9-5, East must take his queen to avoid taking only three tricks in the suit.

There is no scientific way around this problem. If you sacrifice potentially useful spot cards on opening lead to avoid blockages, you will cost yourself tricks in other more normal layouts of the cards. The simple solution is to hope that you do not come up against declarers who are as ingenious as today’s.


When the opponents intervene over Stayman, double from both sides of the table should be penalty, and this is no exception. You don't have to get overly involved here; pass and await developments — and expect them to be gory.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 2
 J 8 7 6
 10 4
♣ A 9 7 5 3
South West North East
1 NT Pass
2♣ 2 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, January 9th, 2014

Our dilemma is that we hate change and love it at the same time; what we really want is for things to remain the same but get better.

Sydney Harris


East North
Both ♠ K 2
 Q 5
 J 10 7 4
♣ Q J 9 5 4
West East
♠ 9 5
 J 8 4 3 2
 K 8 3
♣ 10 8 7
♠ A J 8 6
 10 7 6
 9 6 5 2
♣ 6 2
South
♠ Q 10 7 4 3
 A K 9
 A Q
♣ A K 3
South West North East
Pass
2 NT Pass 3♠* Pass
3 NT Pass 4** Pass
6♣ All pass    

*Slam try with…

**Five clubs and four diamonds

3

In this deal from the 2013 U.S. trials, six clubs has to be played by South, or else a diamond lead through the ace-queen would be fatal. How would you play the slam on a heart lead?

You must avoid leading a spade to the king and ace, or else a diamond return will put you on the spot. Are you going to play for the diamond finesse or for spades to behave? Best is to win the lead in dummy and lead a low spade from the board toward your queen. If West wins the trick, you get to test spades before playing on diamonds. But if it is East with the spade ace, he is caught in a Morton’s Fork Coup.

East cannot fly up with his ace, or declarer can establish three discards for dummy’s diamonds on the top heart and two spades. So East ducks the spade, whereupon declarer wins the queen. Now he discards the spade loser on the hearts, and is almost home. As the cards lie, he can simply draw trump and give up a diamond.

But it is best after pitching the spade loser to play the diamond queen from hand. If the defenders take this, you can unblock diamonds and draw trump. If the diamond queen is ducked, you take two top trumps from hand, and claim if clubs split. If they don’t, you cash the diamond ace, draw trump, then give up a diamond for your 12th trick.


It might be possible to find a more sophisticated approach, but in my opinion there is a lot to be said for simply jumping to six diamonds. If you want to use an ace-asking bid en route, that is fine. But unless you are playing with a very wild pre-empter, you rate to have 12 top tricks, and even if you are off two spade winners, the defenders may have to cash them.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 10 7 4 3
 A K 9
 A Q
♣ A K 3
South West North East
2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, January 8th, 2014

Neither the believer nor the atheist is completely satisfied with appearances.

Andre Malraux


East North
Neither ♠ J 6 3
 A Q J
 A 8 7 2
♣ 10 7 2
West East
♠ 9 8 4
 9 8 7 5 4
 4
♣ A 9 5 3
♠ A 10 5 2
 K 3 2
 Q 10 5 3
♣ 8 6
South
♠ K Q 7
 10 6
 K J 9 6
♣ K Q J 4
South West North East
Pass
1 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

9

Today's problem was encountered by a declarer in the American trials for the World Championships in Bali.

Declarer was playing against an expert and aggressive pair. In three no-trump, on the lead of the heart nine, dummy’s jack lost to the king. Back came a second heart, won in dummy, and South then led a club to the king, which held. What next?

Declarer led the diamond nine to the ace, then finessed in diamonds, discovering that his Right-Hand Opponent had started with four diamonds to the Q-10 when his Left-Hand Opponent threw away a spade. What now?

Declarer went after spades, but East won his ace and cleared the hearts, while West still held the club ace as an entry — down one. The defenders were Denny Clerkin (West) and his brother Jerry. The key to the defense was that when declarer led a club to the king at trick three, Denny ducked without a flicker in a successful attempt to preserve his entry.

It is easy to be wise after the event, but it was probably right for declarer to continue playing on clubs at trick five, unless South deemed West incapable of ducking an ace. If West wins the club ace at his second turn and clears hearts, declarer will go after spades. But if East can win the club ace and then clears hearts, declarer should play on diamonds. East probably does not have two aces and a king, or he would have opened the bidding.


The old-fashioned textbooks (which I read, and in some cases wrote!) used to advocate passing over minor-suit openings unless you had perfect shape or extra values. Take that advice with a pinch of salt. Specifically, facing an unpassed partner, there is no great risk in doubling one club when your values are in the side-suits. Switch the hearts and clubs, and I would pass rather than double.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 6 3
 A Q J
 A 8 7 2
♣ 10 7 2
South West North East
1♣
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, January 7th, 2014

Let other pens dwell on guilt and misery.

Jane Austen


East North
Both ♠ 3 2
 10 9 7 2
 8 7 6
♣ K Q 10 5
West East
♠ K Q 10
 Q 6 5 4 3
 5
♣ 7 6 4 3
♠ 4
 K J 8
 Q J 10 9 4 3
♣ A J 8
South
♠ A J 9 8 7 6 5
 A
 A K 2
♣ 9 2
South West North East
1
Dbl. 1 Pass 2
3♠ Pass 4♠ All pass

5

The names have been omitted in today's deal from last year's trials for Bali to protect the guilty.

Against four spades West led his singleton diamond. Declarer won and played ace and a spade. West followed with the 10 on the first round, then won the queen and returned the heart three (conventionally, lowest from an odd number). Declarer won the ace and led a club to the king in dummy. The first mistake came when East won the ace, despite West’s echo to show an even number of clubs. East should know that declarer must have exactly three diamonds. Partner must have five hearts, giving declarer one heart. So, declarer must have exactly two clubs. Best defense is therefore simply to duck the first club, eliminating dummy’s entry to the clubs.

Now for mistake number two: East returned the diamond queen instead of a heart. Partner can’t possibly need a ruff, since he followed with the spade 10 and queen. Leading a heart would have clarified the situation for partner.

Declarer played the diamond king and now West trumped in, rather than waiting for a possibly useful discard from partner. When he exited with the heart queen rather than playing a club to break up the squeeze, declarer ruffed it and ran the trumps. This squeezed East between the club jack and his master diamond.

In the ending, declarer had to guess what to do in clubs, and he did — at least SOMEONE did something right on the deal!


The first issue here is how high you want to push the opponents; the second is what you want partner to lead if East ends up declarer in a spade or diamond game, or even slam. You should get to the four-level as fast as possible to take away space from your opponents, and you want a club lead. A jump to four clubs should do the trick; it shows the heart fit and a club suit you are happy to have led.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 3 2
 10 9 7 2
 8 7 6
♣ K Q 10 5
South West North East
2 Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 6th, 2014

Many things are not as they seem: The worst things in life never are.

Jim Butcher


South North
Both ♠ 9 3
 A J 5
 A 9 4
♣ A K J 9 8
West East
♠ 8 2
 K 10 8 7 2
 Q J 7 5
♣ 5 4
♠ A K Q 10 7
 9 6 3
 8 2
♣ Q 3 2
South
♠ J 6 5 4
 Q 4
 K 10 6 3
♣ 10 7 6
South West North East
Pass Pass 1♣ 1♠
1 NT Pass 3 NT Pass
All pass      

7

Today's deal from the most recent American trials was generously reported by the victim of proceedings, Christal Henner-Welland. After stretching more than somewhat to respond one no-trump at her first turn (in competition the typical range for this action is 7-10), South was treated to a small-heart lead in three no-trump, and she won East's nine with the queen.

Now, should you play the clubs from the top, or finesse? Playing off the top clubs looks right to me; if West wins the club queen, there is no return he can make that will hurt you. As against that, if West has the club queen and East had ducked the heart king, you will end up with egg all over your face.

At the table, South elected to run the club 10 at trick two, losing to the queen. The spade 10 was returned. How should you play from here? If West started with a small singleton or doubleton, you must cover and win the trick. However, if West started with honor-doubleton, you must duck and the spade suit will be blocked.

At the table declarer ducked, playing for West to hold honor-doubleton in spades. Result: misery. Well done, Roger Lee as East, who overcame his distrustful partner’s opening lead. (The game goes down on a spade lead — but who leads partner’s suit?) When he shifted to the spade 10, he was in effect playing his partner for the spade eight and for declarer to misguess what to do. Clever stuff, eh?


Before I start, I warn you that experts disagree on what you are expected to do here. But partner's double of three no-trump is surely based on the desire for a lead other than hearts. (If he wanted you to lead hearts, he would simply have passed, expecting you to lead his suit.) My guess is he has hearts and good clubs, so I would lead a club.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ J 9 4 2
 9 7 3
 Q 5 3 2
♣ 3 2
South West North East
Pass 1 1 NT
Pass 3 NT Dbl. All pass

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 5th, 2014

We play inverted minor-suit raises, so when I opened one diamond and my partner raised to two, I was looking for a slam, holding ♠ K-Q-7,  A-9-4,  A-K-10-3, ♣ Q-5-4. Since two no-trump would have been nonforcing, what would you recommend? And what would a jump to three no-trump show?

Bonanza, Bellingham, Wash.

A jump to three no-trump would show extra values (typically 18-19) with three diamonds, or a bad four-card suit in a balanced hand. I think I might start with two spades to emphasize where my values lie. Now my partner will either limit his hand with a call of three diamonds or with two no-trump. If he does not, we will go to at least a small slam.

If we are playing Two-Over-One Game-Forcing, what are the suit requirements to open a suit and then jump in it over a two-level response? Does it show extras as well as a good suit?

Hop, Skip, and Jump, Panama City, Fla.

It is normal to play that a jump in a forcing auction shows a semi-solid suit or better (missing at most one of the top two honors) but more than a minimum. So, assuming I held six spades to the king-queen-jack, I would open one spade, then rebid three spades over two clubs with 15HCP or more. With a slightly weaker suit or fewer HCP, two spades would be enough.

Is there a simple mathematical formula for determining how the five remaining cards should split when you have an eight-card trump suit? Can this be extrapolated to give a general rule?

Lex Luther, Atlanta, Ga.

The mathematics for remembering the rule about how the missing cards will split is basically as follows: It is a toss-up with two cards missing, but for any other even number of missing cards, they are somewhat less likely to split evenly than one away from evenly. So a 3-1 break is rather more likely than 2-2; a 4-2 than 3-3. With an odd number of cards missing, they are considerably more likely (use two-thirds as a guideline) to split as evenly as possible.

I often have a problem as responder at my second turn when I have a borderline invitation and no clear fit. For example, in an unopposed auction such as one club – one diamond – one spade, how should I advance as responder with ♠ K-7-4,  9-5-2,  K-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-10-2?

Sundown, Newark, N.J.

A raise to two spades with three trumps and a balanced hand feels wrong to me. (Change the heart two to the diamond two and I would be more sympathetic to that action.) At pairs I'd rebid one no-trump; at teams I'd rebid two clubs if the one-spade call promises at least four clubs, and that the opener would rebid one no-trump with a balanced hand.

In what position or at what vulnerability is it acceptable to open a three-level pre-empt with a six-card suit? How does suit quality or the form of scoring affect that decision?

Booster, Madison, Wis.

You can occasionally open three clubs with six clubs (since there is no other convenient pre-empt). In third seat or at favorable vulnerability, the rules about seven-card suits are often relaxed. This would also apply to a three-diamond opening if you play Flannery. The best suits to bend the rules on are good six-carders without the ace. Having a little side-suit shape (such as a four-card minor) is certainly a plus.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, January 4th, 2014

No one can build his security upon the nobleness of another person.

Willa Cather


North North
East-West ♠ 10 8
 A K 8 3
 Q 10 6
♣ A 10 9 4
West East
♠ 7 6 4 3
 5 2
 J 7 4
♣ Q 7 6 5
♠ 5 2
 Q J 10 9 7
 A K
♣ K J 8 2
South
♠ A K Q J 9
 6 4
 9 8 5 3 2
♣ 3
South West North East
1♣ 1
1♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
4♠ All pass    

5

In today's deal, South took two good views, one in the bidding and one in the play.

To start with, he decided that his 5-5 shape would play better in four spades than in three no-trump, and rather than look for alternative strains, he bid the suit game at his second turn. Right he was: The no-trump game can be defeated via repeated heart leads.

Following this, South had to negotiate the play after the lead of the heart five to dummy’s king. Seeing the paucity of entries to his hand, South decided to go after diamonds at once and simply led a low diamond from dummy. He was prepared to concede three diamond tricks — that would still allow him to take 10 tricks if everything else behaved normally.

At trick two, East won the diamond king and continued the attack on hearts. Dummy’s heart ace won the trick, and the diamond 10 was led. East took the trick and played a third heart, forcing South to ruff. It would have done West little good to pitch his diamond jack, so he threw a club, letting South lead a third diamond for East to ruff.

East had no winning play. If he led a heart, declarer would ruff in hand, cash the club ace, then crossruff for the rest of the tricks. On any other return, declarer would simply draw trumps and take his diamond winners.


One can make a case for rebidding one no-trump to get across the basic nature of the hand (minimum and balanced), but in fact the intermediates in the long suits argue for the simple rebid in clubs. Whatever anyone tells you, a hand with a 5-4-2-2 pattern is better off for play in a suit than in no-trump, all things being equal.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 5 2
 Q J 10 9 7
 A K
♣ K J 8 2
South West North East
1 Pass 1♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 3rd, 2014

But with the morning cool repentance came.

Sir Walter Scott


South North
East-West ♠ J 10 4 3
 A K 8 3
 8 4
♣ 10 6 3
West East
♠ —
 6 4
 A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4
♠ A 9 7 6
 Q 10 9 5 2
 5 2
♣ J 8
South
♠ K Q 8 5 2
 J 7
 K Q 9 6
♣ Q 2
South West North East
1♠ 2 NT 3♠ All pass

♣K

The bridge columnist who originally reported this deal did so as a kind of mea culpa, airing his sin and hoping for forgiveness. Of course, I will not tell you who it was, but the deal does involve an interesting mistake — and have you noticed that is really the only sort of error that bridge experts make?

The deal, from the later stages of a world championship, featured matching mistakes. Against three spades, West led the club king and ace. When everyone followed, she continued with a third round of clubs. Had East discarded a diamond on this trick, South would have been doomed, but instead she ruffed with the six. This mistake was duplicated at almost every table where three spades was declared.

South overruffed with the eight and too quickly played a spade to dummy’s jack, after which she could not recover. It should have been obvious that the first spade lead needed to come from the dummy, but first she should have knocked out the diamond ace. Say West continues with a heart. Declarer wins in the dummy and now plays a spade to her king. If West follows, life is easy, but if she shows out, South is still in control. She cashes her other top diamond, ruffs a diamond with the jack, then takes the remaining high heart and ruffs a heart. Now declarer ruffs her last diamond with dummy’s spade 10, and East is powerless. Whatever she does, declarer must make two of the last three tricks.


To get both your suits into play, bid four no-trump now. This cannot be Blackwood facing a passed partner. Instead, it is an extension of the unusual no-trump, indicating 6-5 or 7-5 in the minors, letting partner pick where he wants to play.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ —
 6 4
 A J 10 7 3
♣ A K 9 7 5 4
South West North East
1♣ 1 Pass 4
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].