November 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
You gotta have a swine to show you where the truffles are.
Edward Albee
West |
North |
Both |
♠ K 10 9 8 2
♥ 2
♦ J 9 8 3
♣ K Q 10 |
West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ A K J 8 7
♦ K 10 5
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
♠ Q J 7 5 3
♥ 10 9 6 3
♦ Q 7 6
♣ 4 |
South |
♠ A 6
♥ Q 5 4
♦ A 4 2
♣ A J 9 8 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
On this auction your partner's two-spade call suggests a weak hand with no game interest and approximately a five-card suit. In just the same way that you complete the transfer when partner asks you to, so here you must pass two spades. If your partner were interested in another strain or a higher level, he would not have signed off, as he did here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6
♥ Q 5 4
♦ A 4 2
♣ A J 9 8 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
2♦ |
2♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It gets late early out there.
Yogi Berra
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 10 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ J 7 4 2
♣ A Q 10 6 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6 2
♥ 8 4
♦ 10 8 6 3
♣ 7 2 |
♠ J 7 5
♥ Q J 10 9 3
♦ A 9
♣ K 8 3 |
South |
♠ A K 3
♥ K 7 2
♦ K Q 5
♣ J 9 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠6
Dummy is going to put down a Yarborough with long spades, while declarer has at least six diamonds and about a 19-count. Your target should be to look for the most passive option. My guess would be to lead a spade since I expect declarer to have no more than a singleton. Thus leading the suit cannot cost a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 2
♥ 10 8 6 3
♦ K 5
♣ J 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
All pass |
|
|
|
November 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 28th, 2012
I held ♠ A-J-8-3-2, ♥ J-10-7-4, ♦ Q-9, ♣ 9-3, but did not overcall against a strong club. This worked particularly well because the opponents arrived at three no-trump. I opened with a low spade and we took the first five spades for down one. Declarer had gambled on the no-trump game without a spade stopper because neither my partner nor I had bid spades. He had assumed they rated to break 4-4. Should I have bid?
Reassessment, Hackensack, N.J.
The question of whether to overcall against one club is problematic. If your partner had been on lead to the final contract, you might have got a zero, not a top, I suppose I tend to bid at my first opportunity and let them draw the inferences at their peril.
My club teacher said that unless you have at least two aces in your hand, you should not use Blackwood. This teacher plays duplicate bridge successfully, but are there different rules for rubber bridge?
On Demand, Pleasanton, Calif.
This was not good advice, though I understand the sentiment. It is certainly true in a slam-going auction that you shouldn't bid Blackwood if you can't handle a response of two aces or key cards. But you can certainly ask with one ace if you have the appropriate hand.
Would you overcall a weak two diamonds with either a double or a two-heart bid when you hold ♠ Q-10-9-4, ♥ K-J-7-3-2, ♦ A-2, ♣ J-4? What would be your reason for acting, or passing?
Youth Wants to Know, Durham, N.C.
|
With relatively short diamonds, you are supposed to act with marginal values. While I would have overcalled one diamond with a one-heart bid, I think doubling two diamonds gives you the best chance to find a fit. If partner is weak with clubs, you can blame him for having the wrong hand! Make the hearts just a little stronger, and I'd go for the overcall.
I have zero interest in bridge but I do read your quotes with the anticipation that I will understand one in 10 of them! Just what level of intelligence or study do you think it takes to understand all or most of them? If nothing else, it challenges my mental acuity and I look forward to the stimulation when I connect — which obviously isn't very often!
Tom the Piper's Son, San Diego, Calif.
I'm glad you asked me. When I've written the deal up, I look for a theme in the play or the bidding and try to find a quote that picks up on this. If I am short of inspiration, I look for something funny, or striking.
I like to cut the deck as close to the bottom as I can (my grandpappy having instilled "Cut thin to win" into my subconscious). Recently my cut was questioned. Is there a minimum number of cards that must appear in each pile? And what happens after the cut is made?
The Unkindest Cut, Bay City, Mich.
Each half must have four or more cards in the cut. It is proper for the dealer to put them back in one pile. Good luck and enjoy your bridge. You can download the official rules from the ACBL web site here.
|
November 10th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Still you are not satisfied, Still you tremble faint reproach; Challenge me I keep aside Secrets that you may not broach.
D.H Lawrence
North |
North |
Neither |
♠ 9 3
♥ K 6 5
♦ A Q 10
♣ A K Q J 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ Q J 10 3
♦ J 7 6 2
♣ 7 6 4 3 |
♠ K 8 4 2
♥ A 9 8
♦ 8 4 3
♣ 9 8 2 |
South |
♠ A Q J 10 6 5
♥ 7 4 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Your quick tricks might suggest bidding three no-trump here, but in fact two no-trump will suffice. That shows 18-19 in a balanced hand and lets partner participate in the decision of whether to play in a part-score or a game. A call of three clubs would be cowardly; and on a spade lead it might play equally badly because of the risk of heart ruffs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 3
♥ K 6 5
♦ A Q 10
♣ A K Q J 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 9th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
A man is not idle because he is absorbed in thought. There is a visible labor and there is an invisible labor.
Victor Hugo
West |
North |
North-South |
♠ K Q 9 8 4
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 4 3
♣ J 4 |
West |
East |
♠ A 10 5 3
♥ Q 5
♦ A 9 8 2
♣ K 5 3 |
♠ J 7 2
♥ K J 7 4 3
♦ 7 6 5
♣ 10 9 |
South |
♠ 6
♥ A 10 9 2
♦ Q 10
♣ A Q 8 7 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 NT* |
2♦** |
2♥ |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*12-14
**Spades and another suit
♦2
Pass. A double of two diamonds would be penalty here, but you need rather more in defensive strength than this hand. Since the opponents are fairly sure to be correcting to two hearts now, a contract against which you have no sure winners, you don't want to encourage partner to double that contract unless he has real extras on defense.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 9 8 4
♥ 8 6
♦ K J 4 3
♣ J 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♦ |
? |
|
|
|
November 8th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
But what is Freedom? Rightly understood, A universal license to be good.
Hartley Coleridge
South |
North |
North-South |
♠ K 4
♥ J 7 6 5
♦ K 6 3 2
♣ 9 8 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ K Q 8 4 2
♦ A J 10
♣ K 10 7 3 |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ 10 9 3
♦ 7 4
♣ J 6 5 4 |
South |
♠ A Q 7 6 5 3
♥ A
♦ Q 9 8 5
♣ A Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
There’s the rub!
The auction has made it clear that you rate to be facing a very weak hand with long clubs and short spades. If so, where do you think you want to play? I'd guess a club part-score — wouldn't you? If your partner has six clubs to the jack, he may take four tricks in his own hand in clubs and offer you none in a spade contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 7 6 5 3
♥ A
♦ Q 9 8 5
♣ A Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
You are my companion Down the silver road, Still and many-changing, Infinitely changing.
Edith Wyatt
North |
North |
East-West |
♠ A K 2
♥ 4 3
♦ A Q 4 3
♣ J 9 7 6 |
West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 3
♥ 7 5
♦ J 9 8 7 6
♣ K 8 |
♠ Q 9 6 5
♥ Q J 10 9 2
♦ 10
♣ A 5 2 |
South |
♠ 10 4
♥ A K 8 6
♦ K 5 2
♣ Q 10 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥7
Even though you have only three spades, this hand is ideal for a takeout double. Here, when you double one no-trump, you show an opening hand and the values to double one heart for takeout. Partner will either pass with a penalty double of hearts or describe his hand appropriately.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 2
♥ 4 3
♦ A Q 4 3
♣ J 9 7 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
? |
|
|
|
November 6th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
No one is such a liar as the indignant man.
Friedrich Nietzsche
East |
North |
Neither |
♠ A K 9
♥ K Q 8 6
♦ A 9 8 3
♣ 8 5 |
West |
East |
♠ J 3
♥ 9 5 3
♦ 7 2
♣ A K Q J 9 6 |
♠ Q 8 7 6 5
♥ A 4 2
♦ K 10
♣ 10 7 3 |
South |
♠ 10 4 2
♥ J 10 7
♦ Q J 6 5 4
♣ 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
3♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Did you get fancy, looking to play six clubs or five clubs here? Settle for simplicity and bid the cards in front of you. Both slam and five clubs are a long way away. Respond three no-trump and hope declarer can reach your clubs … and yes, I'm only joking.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 3
♥ 9 5 3
♦ 7 2
♣ A K Q J 9 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 5th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
What we anticipate seldom occurs; what we least expected generally happens.
Benjamin Disraeli
South |
North |
Both |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ 9
♦ K Q 10 8 7
♣ 7 6 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ Q J 10 8 7 6 4 3
♦ A J 9 5
♣ 4 |
♠ Q 7 6
♥ K 5 2
♦ 6 4 2
♣ 10 9 8 3 |
South |
♠ A K J 10 9 8 4
♥ A
♦ 3
♣ A K Q J |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2♣ |
5♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Sometimes the simplest solutions are the best. Since declarer is as likely as dummy to be short in hearts, you might as well lead a low heart. Partner can win and continue the suit in an attempt to tap declarer out and maybe establish your small trumps.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 5
♥ K 9 6 3
♦ J 2
♣ J 9 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
November 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 21st, 2012
Are the rules for bidding in sandwich seat the same as for making an overcall? Yesterday when vulnerable I dealt myself ♠ K-Q-2, ♥ 9-7-4, ♦ 8-4, ♣ A-Q-8-3-2. I passed, but after one diamond to my left and one heart to my right I felt obliged to bid two clubs. My partner subsequently did not agree. What do you say?
Interrupter, Selma, Ala.
You should beware of overcalling vulnerable at the two-level on suits without decent intermediates, especially when you don't know whether you really want the suit you bid led. Here, why do you think a spade lead would be bad, if that is your partner's natural lead?
A recent column that appeared in the Houston Chronicle dealt with how to play Q-10-x facing A-9-8-x for three tricks. You discussed the fact that running the queen gives the defenders no chance to err, while low toward the queen lets you read the table. Can that approach be extended to advancing the 10 from hand with A-J-x-x in dummy facing K-10-9-x?
Applying Pressure, Madison, Wis.
I like the idea of giving the opponents a chance to play an honor, so here running the 10 to tempt a cover looks best. But move the nine into the dummy and leading the jack from that holding might give you a chance to gauge the opponents' reactions.
With ♠ Q-9-8-3, ♥ 7-4, ♦ K-9, ♣ A-Q-6-4-3, should I pass or bid? And does the vulnerability or form of scoring matter?
First Up, Grenada, Miss.
With a decent lead-directing suit and a guaranteed easy rebid in spades, this is a clear-cut opener, even in Standard American. It would not take much to persuade me to pass — for example, make the second suit diamonds, not spades. Equally, move my club queen into hearts so that I held ace-fifth of clubs, and now my suit is no longer one that I feel the need to emphasize.
|
Playing matchpoints, I was in second seat with ♠ A-K, ♥ K-Q-7-4, ♦ A-10-6-3-2 ♣ A-2 and opened one diamond. My partner, who had five small spades and the doubleton king-queen of diamonds with no other honors, passed. We made five while others played three no-trump and brought it home. Could I have opened with an off-shape call of two no-trump, and should my partner have responded one spade?
Four in Hand, Montreal, Quebec
Yes, that is a respectable but not compulsory two-no-trump opening. With 20 quasi-balanced points, go for the aggressive action. (You may miss a diamond slam but you reach the major-suit games more easily.) I'd also have responded one spade in an attempt to improve the partscore. But nobody did anything stupid; three no-trump, on a club lead, surely needs at least one of the red suits to behave.
I learned the club/diamond responses to Roman Keycard Blackwood as showing 1 or 4 and 0 or 3, respectively, and that is how I usually see it in your columns. But once in a while, the responses are reversed. Is it simply partnership agreement to play it one way versus the other? Is one way advantageous somehow?
Back to Front, Canton, Ga.
Yes, this is no more than a matter of partnership agreement. The 14/30 responses came after the other scheme; there may be a small percentage advantage, but it is more than outweighed by the issue of remembering what you play!
|
|
Regular partnerships have firm agreements about leading honors against no-trump. One of the more sensible agreements is that from ace-king combinations, you lead the king if you want your partner to unblock the queen or jack, while the ace asks for attitude. Under the king, third hand drops an honor if he has one, or signals count.
Today, against three no-trump West leads the heart king and East follows with the 10, suggesting a four-card suit. Now West knows a heart continuation would set up South’s queen, so he shifts to a club. Declarer wins the king and has to find a way to a ninth trick.
While declarer could hope to develop a trick from the spades, diamonds offer far more hope. At trick three, declarer must lead the diamond eight from the board, as a sort of avoidance play. He is trying to set up a diamond trick while keeping East off lead. This approach will produce two tricks when East has only one of the diamond 10, queen or king.
Here West wins the diamond and plays a spade. South wins in hand, leads a club to the board, then plays the diamond jack, intending to let that card run if East plays low. When East covers, declarer wins the ace and plays a third diamond, thus setting up the long diamond for his ninth winner.