November 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 21st, 2012
Are the rules for bidding in sandwich seat the same as for making an overcall? Yesterday when vulnerable I dealt myself ♠ K-Q-2, ♥ 9-7-4, ♦ 8-4, ♣ A-Q-8-3-2. I passed, but after one diamond to my left and one heart to my right I felt obliged to bid two clubs. My partner subsequently did not agree. What do you say?
Interrupter, Selma, Ala.
You should beware of overcalling vulnerable at the two-level on suits without decent intermediates, especially when you don't know whether you really want the suit you bid led. Here, why do you think a spade lead would be bad, if that is your partner's natural lead?
A recent column that appeared in the Houston Chronicle dealt with how to play Q-10-x facing A-9-8-x for three tricks. You discussed the fact that running the queen gives the defenders no chance to err, while low toward the queen lets you read the table. Can that approach be extended to advancing the 10 from hand with A-J-x-x in dummy facing K-10-9-x?
Applying Pressure, Madison, Wis.
I like the idea of giving the opponents a chance to play an honor, so here running the 10 to tempt a cover looks best. But move the nine into the dummy and leading the jack from that holding might give you a chance to gauge the opponents' reactions.
With ♠ Q-9-8-3, ♥ 7-4, ♦ K-9, ♣ A-Q-6-4-3, should I pass or bid? And does the vulnerability or form of scoring matter?
First Up, Grenada, Miss.
With a decent lead-directing suit and a guaranteed easy rebid in spades, this is a clear-cut opener, even in Standard American. It would not take much to persuade me to pass — for example, make the second suit diamonds, not spades. Equally, move my club queen into hearts so that I held ace-fifth of clubs, and now my suit is no longer one that I feel the need to emphasize.
|
Playing matchpoints, I was in second seat with ♠ A-K, ♥ K-Q-7-4, ♦ A-10-6-3-2 ♣ A-2 and opened one diamond. My partner, who had five small spades and the doubleton king-queen of diamonds with no other honors, passed. We made five while others played three no-trump and brought it home. Could I have opened with an off-shape call of two no-trump, and should my partner have responded one spade?
Four in Hand, Montreal, Quebec
Yes, that is a respectable but not compulsory two-no-trump opening. With 20 quasi-balanced points, go for the aggressive action. (You may miss a diamond slam but you reach the major-suit games more easily.) I'd also have responded one spade in an attempt to improve the partscore. But nobody did anything stupid; three no-trump, on a club lead, surely needs at least one of the red suits to behave.
I learned the club/diamond responses to Roman Keycard Blackwood as showing 1 or 4 and 0 or 3, respectively, and that is how I usually see it in your columns. But once in a while, the responses are reversed. Is it simply partnership agreement to play it one way versus the other? Is one way advantageous somehow?
Back to Front, Canton, Ga.
Yes, this is no more than a matter of partnership agreement. The 14/30 responses came after the other scheme; there may be a small percentage advantage, but it is more than outweighed by the issue of remembering what you play!
|
November 3rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 20th, 2012
Must I change my triumphant songs? Said I to myself; Must I indeed learn to chant the cold dirges of the baffled? And sullen hymns of defeat?
Walt Whitman
North |
North |
East-West |
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 5 3 2
♦ Q 9 8 5 4
♣ 7 4 |
West |
East |
♠ A 10 7 2
♥ 4
♦ 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 6 5 3 |
♠ K 8 4
♥ K 10 9 8 6
♦ A 10 3
♣ 8 2 |
South |
♠ J 6 3
♥ A Q J 7
♦ K J
♣ A K J 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣5
You have just enough to raise to four spades. The reason is that had your partner made a three-spade overcall, he would have already shown a decent opening bid. The double followed by a new suit bid shows even more extras, and while you cannot be sure your diamond queen and doubleton club will be useful, it is better to have them than not.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 5 3 2
♦ Q 9 8 5 4
♣ 7 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 2nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
As far as I'm concerned, I prefer silent vice to ostentatious virtue.
Albert Einstein
North |
North |
North-South |
♠ K 10 7 4
♥ 4 3 2
♦ A Q 7 3
♣ A 8 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 8 5
♥ 7
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q J 9 7 4 |
♠ A 9 6 2
♥ K J 6
♦ 10 6 5 4
♣ 3 2 |
South |
♠ 3
♥ A Q 10 9 8 5
♦ K J 9
♣ 10 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
3♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Do not show this problem to anyone of an impressionable age or to a player suffering from a weak heart. My recommendation is that you use four hearts as a slam-try in spades, neither promising nor denying a heart control. The logic is that with four of a minor being natural here, you need a slam-try for spades. The choice — quite a reasonable alternative — is to jump to five spades to ask for a heart control.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 4
♥ 4 3 2
♦ A Q 7 3
♣ A 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 1st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
To mischief trained, e'en from his mother's womb, Grown old in fraud, though yet in manhood’s bloom.
Charles Churchill
North |
North |
North-South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 5
♥ 3 2
♦ A 8
♣ A J 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ A 4 2
♥ Q 10 9 7 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ 8 3 |
♠ J 6 3
♥ K J 4
♦ K Q J 9 6
♣ 9 7 |
South |
♠ K 7
♥ A 8 6
♦ 10 4 3
♣ K Q 10 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Whether you play two clubs as forcing or not, that is the call you should make now. You have no idea what the correct strain or level for this hand is (or even if it is your side's hand), so make a natural call and wait to support spades at your next turn, suggesting very much this sort of hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7
♥ A 8 6
♦ 10 4 3
♣ K Q 10 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 31st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The Poets … overtake The Ideal with the brush, or, soaring, wake Far in the rolling clouds their glorious strings.
Lloyd Mifflin
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ A Q J 8 3
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q J |
West |
East |
♠ 9 7 5 2
♥ K 6
♦ J 6 4 3
♣ 8 7 6 |
♠ 4
♥ Q 7 4 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 10 9 5 4 3 2 |
South |
♠ K 10 6
♥ A J 10 9
♦ A K 9 2
♣ A K |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♣8
How many points are there in this deck? Since it is very common nowadays to use a jump to two spades as semi-pre-emptive (the same hand but with, say, ace-fifth of spades), it is not easy to show a limit bid in spades. Best is to pass — which initially indicates nothing to say — then to jump in spades to show a real spade invitation.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 8 3
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q J |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
? |
|
|
|
October 30th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Wickedness is always easier than virtue, for it takes the shortcut to everything.
Samuel Johnson
East |
North |
East-West |
♠ A Q 8 7
♥ 10 5 4 3
♦ 10 2
♣ A K 7 |
West |
East |
♠ J 6
♥ Q J 8 2
♦ K 8 4 3
♣ J 6 4 |
♠ 10 9 3 2
♥ A K 7 6
♦ J 6 5
♣ 5 3 |
South |
♠ K 5 4
♥ 9
♦ A Q 9 7
♣ Q 10 9 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♦* |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Fourth suit forcing
♠J
Resist the temptation to use the ubiquitous and iniquitous cuebid simply to announce a good hand. This is a task for … super-cuebid. Here a jump to four hearts is a splinter agreeing clubs and setting up a game-force. As you can see, slam might be cold facing the right minimum hand, and you owe it to your partner not to give up on it just because both opponents are bidding.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 4
♥ 9
♦ A Q 9 7
♣ Q 10 9 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
2♣ |
2♥ |
? |
|
|
|
October 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
It is commonly said, and more particularly by Lord Shaftesbury, that ridicule is the best test of truth.
Lord Chesterfield
South |
North |
East-West |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 5
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ K Q 9 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9
♥ K J 9 7 6 2
♦ 7 5 4
♣ 6 5 |
♠ J 10 4
♥ A 10 4
♦ J 8 2
♣ A 10 8 4 |
South |
♠ A K 7 6 3 2
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q 3
♣ J 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
This is a simple choice between the majors. Is a spade lead more likely to give declarer something he cannot do for himself, given that partner rates to be 5-5 or 5-4 in the majors (and unsuitable for a reopening double)? I lean toward a heart if only because this might go some way to insuring a ruff or overruff for our side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 3
♥ 8 6
♦ K 7 5 2
♣ Q 9 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
3♣ |
All pass |
|
October 28th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Please assess the blame. West opened three spades to my right, and I held 14 points in aces and kings, with two spades, three hearts, and four cards in each minor. I passed, and when my partner let it go with four decent spades and 12 points, it was passed out; down five for 500! Meanwhile, we could have made 660 in three no-trump. Did either of us do anything wrong?
Finger-Pointer, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
If you forced me to act with one of the hands, I would double three spades in the direct seat, aware that this is an overbid but feeling obligated to take the pressure off partner. With the responding hand I would surely pass if three spades came around to me; one can't balance and play partner to hold this much. Nobody did anything silly at your table.
Do you like the idea of signaling suit preference on the suits attacked by your opponents? When if ever should you instead signal count or attitude?
Signal Corps, Rockford, Ill.
Never signal attitude on a suit played by your opponent. You never need to do that – if your opponent has played the wrong suit you should already be doing just fine! Signal count only if you think partner's play in that suit or another suit will depend on the number of cards you hold. Otherwise play up the line as a default, or if you think partner is paying attention, use your small cards for suit preference.
I was confronted with an unusual auction in a recent club match. I opened one club, my LHO doubled, my partner passed, and and my RHO bid one heart. This was passed back to my partner, who doubled. Holding ♠ Q-9-8-3, ♥ J-10, ♦ K-Q-9, ♣ A-Q-5-2, should I pass or bid?
Torn in Two, Levittown, Pa.
|
Unfortunately, your doubleton heart does not tell you whether partner has scattered values with two or three hearts, or if he has a strong hand with four hearts and is looking for a penalty. Since with the latter hand he might have redoubled on the round before, I will play safely and bid one spade, then apologize later.
At my club, the reigning expert opened three spades against me. I passed, holding two small cards each in spades and hearts, six diamonds to the ace, and three low clubs. My RHO bid three no-trump, and now my partner sacrificed in four clubs. The expert bid four spades, raised to six spades! At favorable vulnerability would you sacrifice when the bidding comes back to you, and if not, what would you lead?
Biting the Bullet, East Brunswick, N.J.
I would never sacrifice here. Even if you are right, you are probably going to get a zero for minus 800. I'd lead the diamond ace. Dummy surely has all the other first-round controls. Maybe I can give my partner a ruff, or cash a second diamond.
I play contract bridge with a group of friends. Recently one of the players mentioned a rule I had never heard of nor could I confirm it in my bridge books. If I open with one in a suit, she said I may not rebid that suit, unless I have six there. Is that sensible advice?
Second Hand Rose, Jackson, Tenn.
This is sensible advice but is not a rule, more a guideline. A better way to put it is that facing a one-level response, you would only rebid a five-card minor if it looked like six and had no viable alternative. But situations sometimes demand it, when you cannot bid one no-trump and have no second suit.
For the record, facing a two-level response, you are often faced with a flawed two no-trump rebid, or the need to repeat a moderate five-carder. In general what you do here is more about style than right or wrong.
|
October 27th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
And who's of this or that estate We do not wholly calculate, When baffling shades that shift and cling Are not without their glimmering.
Edwin Arlington Robinson
North |
North |
East-West |
♠ A 10 2
♥ A K J 5
♦ 10 5 4 3
♣ 10 7 |
West |
East |
♠ 8 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 4
♦ 7 2
♣ A J 9 2 |
♠ J 9
♥ Q 6
♦ K Q 9 8
♣ Q 8 5 4 3 |
South |
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ 7 3 2
♦ A J 6
♣ K 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Three diamonds. Although I'm loath to suggest additional conventions for the intermediate player, I believe that a raise to three diamonds should be forcing now. With a weak hand here, South should bid either fourth suit or two no-trump (whichever is cheaper) as an artificial statement of weakness, denying five cards in his original suit. Repeating his own suit should simply show five cards and be a one-round force.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ 7 3 2
♦ A J 6
♣ K 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 26th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Practice is the best of all instructors.
Publilius Syrus
South |
North |
North-South |
♠ 10 7 3
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ A K J 4
♣ 9 7 |
West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 10 8 6 4 2
♦ 10 8 6
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ Q J 9 6 5
♥ K 9
♦ Q 9 5 2
♣ J 3 |
South |
♠ A K 8 2
♥ A J
♦ 7 3
♣ A K Q 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠* |
Dbl. |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
*Three controls (two for an ace, one for a king)
♠4
In the context of limit raises, you couldn't have a better hand. While there is a slim chance that you have three fast spade losers, I think your third-round club control allows you to bid five diamonds now, suggesting an additional diamond control and no spade control. The five-level really should be safe.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 3
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ A K J 4
♣ 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
Second hand low is not always best. Consider today's deal from the 2011 Bermuda Bowl, where South generally ended up playing two or three no-trump on a club lead to his nine. All declarers next played the diamond king, and most Easts won the second diamond to return a club. South does best to win and lead a spade, hoping to force an entry to dummy's diamonds.
West should now infer that East must have the spade king to have won the diamond. So if South leads a low spade, West must insert the 10! Now the defenders can deny declarer an entry to dummy whatever he does. By contrast, if South starts by leading out the spade jack, both defenders must duck.
When Chris Bosenberg of South Africa was declarer, he played on diamonds at trick two, and East took the second diamond and played back a heart.
Declarer finessed, cashed the club ace, and exited with a low heart — a fine play. East won and returned a low heart, letting declarer repeat the finesse (West pitching his diamond and a club) and play a spade to the nine and king. That now ensured the entry to dummy for the contract.
Here, the blocking play of the spade 10 by West would not have worked. East could win the spade king and return a spade, but declarer could play the spade jack. Now West’s winning the trick gives declarer the entry to dummy, while ducking the trick leads to West’s being subsequently endplayed in spades.