January 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, January 16th, 2018
Mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun.
Noel Coward
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 3
♥ A Q 10 6
♦ 4
♣ A J 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 2
♥ J 9 8 7 4 3 2
♦ K Q 7
♣ 3 |
♠ 9 7 5
♥ —
♦ J 10 9 6 5
♣ K 10 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6 4
♥ K 5
♦ A 8 3 2
♣ Q 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣* |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
*Three key-cards
♥4
This hand seems a little too good for a raise to three no-trump. The only safe way to explore is to bid three clubs, which in this context just implies doubt about strain or level. It is easy to imagine that a seven-card fit might play better in slam or even game than in no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 3
♥ A Q 10 6
♦ 4
♣ A J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A knowledgeable fool is a greater fool than an ignorant fool.
Molière
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 6
♥ A 6 5 3
♦ Q 6 5 2
♣ A K 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ K 10 8
♦ A 10 9
♣ Q J 9 8 6 5 |
♠ J 8 7 4 3 2
♥ 7
♦ K 8 7 4
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ Q J 9 4 2
♦ J 3
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
Your side surely has the balance of high cards. How is declarer ever going to make 10 tricks here if you lead the heart ace and continue in trump? Yes, dummy might conceivably produce a good diamond suit, but you surely still have time to shift to spades. So the heart ace feels right to me, even if a low trump is slightly safer.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 4
♥ A 9 6
♦ K J 4
♣ A 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| 2 NT |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
January 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
As a non-expert who plays a few bells and whistles (one of which is using jumps both in and out of competition as shortage and fit for partner but not game-forcing), I saw a deal in your column recently where this would have reached a slam that was missed around the room. Have you contemplated using that method?
Lipstick Lizard, Houston, Texas
In an uncontested auction, such jumps should be natural — though you can agree any range for the call you like. A jump to three hearts, after partner opens one spade and the next hand bids two diamonds, for example, should be either weak or fit-showing. Minisplinters as you describe them are not my favorite. Will I change my methods? No — that may be the only hand these methods would work for!
I heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one heart. My hand was ♠ 9-8-3-2, ♥ A-K-J, ♦ J-7-5, ♣ Q-9-3, and I chose to ignore the spades and jump to two no-trump, invitational. My partner now bid three clubs, which I assume is forcing. What should I do now?
Continuing Education, London, Ontario
I do not see any reason not to bid three diamonds. This hand is exactly in range for what partner expects, and now partner may pass (which is fine by me) or bid values in whichever major he has values in. If he bids three hearts, I’d expect the spades to be wide open and go past three no-trump (maybe with a call of four hearts).
I have been taught to play a style where two-over-one is a game force except when responder rebid his suit. I find the only downside to this approach is that with a full opening hand, responder must find a second bid other than his suit at the three-level. What is your opinion of this style?
Old Jerrold, Spokane, Wash.
The main advantage of two-over-one is to establish a fit as early as possible between the partners, so every bid now becomes forcing. This means that your possible games and slams can be properly explored. That isn’t so when responder is denied the ability to make a forcing rebid of his own suit. I’ve reluctantly moved to believing that a rebid at the three-level should be forcing to game. So an immediate jump to the three-level becomes a good suit with only invitational values.
|
I held ♠ A-Q-2, ♥ K-J-2, ♦ K-10-4, ♣ K-Q-3-2, and heard my RHO open one spade. Would you elect to double or bid one no-trump? I chose to bid one no-trump, and my partner passed with five diamonds to the ace-jack. However, we could make three no-trump easily enough.
Undercooked, North Bay, Ontario
Your hand is a fraction too strong for your chosen call, especially because your hearts are positionally worth a lot more than 4 high-card points. I’d choose to double and rebid in no-trump to show 18-20, feeling I have plenty in hand. If my RHO had opened one spade, I would surely overcall one no-trump, as so many more of my points are tied up in my heart stoppers.
What defense do you recommend against a weak no-trump? As a parallel thought, what meaning would you assign to a passed hand’s double of a strong no-trump?
Horse Before the Cart, Memphis, Tenn.
While an artificial double of a strong no-trump is perfectly playable, I strongly suggest any defense against a weak no-trump should include a penalty double with a call reserved to show the majors (either two clubs or two diamonds). That means playing Landy or Cappelletti. By a passed hand, you could try using a double as clubs.
|
January 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
You don’t play characters that are celebrities — you play guys who know what to do when their septic tank’s blocked.
Matthew McConaughey
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 3
♥ A 3
♦ A K Q
♣ 8 7 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ 7 5
♦ 6 4
♣ A K J 10 9 |
♠ 5
♥ K J 10 9 8 6 4
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9 2
♥ Q 2
♦ J 7 5 2
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♥ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Good raise to four spades
♣K
This hand is at the very lower limit for an invitational raise to two no-trump, but I think I’d make that call. Of course, one no-trump is not forcing, but you do have extras, just enough perhaps, to risk the try for game. Yes, a builder in diamonds such as the 10 would be nice, but beggars can’t be choosers.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 9 2
♥ Q 2
♦ J 7 5 2
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul.
William Ernest Henley
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 5 4
♥ K 5
♦ K J 9 6 3
♣ Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 3 2
♥ J 10 9 7
♦ 4
♣ 10 7 3 |
♠ J 10 6
♥ A 8 4 2
♦ 7 5
♣ K J 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ Q 6 3
♦ A Q 10 8 2
♣ A 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♠* |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
*Two key-cards and the diamond queen
♥J
Your partner’s rebid shows a balanced hand with or without a four-card major. You want to play no-trump if facing a spade stopper, but wouldn’t it be nice to get across the nature of your hand (club support and singleton spade) in one go? You can: Jump to three spades — a splinter-bid since two spades would be natural and forcing — to give partner the choice of playing in either minor or no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ Q 6 3
♦ A Q 10 8 2
♣ A 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Help yourself, and heaven will help you.
Jean de la Fontaine
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 6 5
♥ A 9 3
♦ 9 8 2
♣ 10 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 2
♥ J 10 8 6 2
♦ K 10 7
♣ K Q 7 |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 7 4
♦ Q 6 5 4
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 7
♥ K Q 5
♦ A J 3
♣ A J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
There is no need to do anything but raise to four diamonds here. A jump to game would be weaker than the simple raise. You may not have a great hand, but you do have good trumps, a control and a ruffing value. The real question is whether to cooperate in any cuebidding sequence partner may initiate. I say yes.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ 7 4
♦ Q 6 5 4
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
If you can learn a simple trick, Scout, you’ll get along a lot better with all kinds of folks. You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view, until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it.
Atticus Finch
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K J 8 5
♣ K 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 8
♥ K Q
♦ 10 7 6 2
♣ 9 6 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 7 6 3
♥ A J
♦ 9 4
♣ J 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ 4 2
♥ 10 8 6 5 3 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
This is the bidding in the diagrammed deal, but I would recommend going through the forcing no-trump rather than raising hearts (assuming you play raises as constructive). The sterile distribution and weak trumps suggest taking the pessimistic position. I agree that this is close; make the trumps 10-9-third, and I might take the opposite path.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K J 8 5
♣ K 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Ill ware is never cheap. Pleasing ware is half sold.
English Proverb
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q J 8 7 2
♥ A 2
♦ K J 2
♣ A 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5 4
♥ J 9 4
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 9 6 2 |
♠ 6 3
♥ 10 8 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 3
♣ J 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9
♥ K Q 7 6
♦ A Q 5
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT* |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Quantitative
♠4
Whether or not your three clubs promised extras (it is constructive if you play Lebensohl here), you have enough to drive to game — but which? You should bid three hearts, suggesting you need help in hearts for no-trump. You hope partner will bid three no-trump with queen-doubleton in hearts, though I admit that this may not always be the right thing to do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ J 9 4
♦ J 6 4
♣ K 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Those who have improved life by the knowledge they have found out … round the brows of all these is worn a snow white band.
Virgil
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 6 4
♥ 7 5
♦ 7 5 3
♣ A J 10 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 8 7
♥ K 8 4 2
♦ K J 9
♣ 4 |
♠ 5 2
♥ J 10 9 6 3
♦ 8 6 4 2
♣ K 6 |
| South |
♠ K 10 3
♥ A Q
♦ A Q 10
♣ Q 8 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
Dummy is surely going to have long hearts and a near Yarborough, since it could not bid over one no-trump. The most passive lead I can see here is a top club, since a spade or diamond lead might easily pick up an honor in partner’s hand that declarer could not negotiate for himself. Even if partner has the club ace, the club lead may not end up costing a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3
♥ Q 10 6
♦ 9 7 4
♣ Q J 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 7th, 2018
|
Recently I balanced with two no-trump after one heart to my right and two hearts to my left. I held ♠ A-3, ♥ J-4, ♦ Q-J-7-5, ♣ Q-10-9-3-2. Was that reasonable? Next came three hearts to my right and four hearts to my left! I was once taught that if you push the opponents into game, you should either double or bid one more, on the theory that minus 620 is going to be the same zero as minus 790.
Mollycoddler, Springfield, Mass.
Sometimes the opponents reach a normal game in abnormal fashion — as here — and you were going to get an average had you not doubled. The time to double is when you figure your contract is going to make and thus you need to protect your plusscore. Or you may double when you know the suits are not breaking; here they appear to be breaking about as well as possible.
The following hand occurred last night. My LHO opened two spades; my partner had no spades, the singleton heart king, and six cards in each minor to the A-K-J. What would you bid in his shoes?
Twinset, Anchorage, Alaska
I would have both four no-trump and four spades available to show the minors, with four spades being the stronger action. This hand would qualify for the stronger call, with four no-trump in response asking partner to pick his better minor. As an aside, many play Leaping Michaels here; jumps to four of a minor show that minor and the unbid major.
I’d like to help my friends and children learn bridge. But I learned by reading Goren’s “New Bridge Complete,” and most won’t take the time to go through it; they want to learn while playing. What is your advice on how to help people learn? I think schools are unlikely to do much with bridge unless there are parents, teachers or students who already have an appreciation.
Trainer, Pottsville, Pa.
Teaching children minibridge (where learning about the auction comes after learning how to play the cards) is a good start. With very young children, start with knockout whist and simple trick-taking games. A good source for minibridge is the Wikipedia page, which gives references for many countries.
|
How would you lead from a holding such as K-10-9 or K-J-10 in the middle of the hand? My partner has been trying to persuade me to lead the lowest card from the sequence.
Alternative Reality, Park City, Utah
When leading toward the queen in dummy, it may be important to be able to distinguish K-10-9 or K-J-10 from 10-9 or J-10. That is the only time I would advocate playing coded 10s or nines, with the jack denying a higher honor. I suppose it may also be critical if leading through declarer. In general, I think that method may give away too much information on opening lead.
What is the best way to decide whether to open a weak twobid? Specifically, holding ♠ 3-2, ♥ J-10-8-7-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4, I would think my hand too weak for a pre-empt. How much better must it be to qualify as a weak two — or would it depend on the vulnerability?
Ford Prefect, Houston, Texas
Make the heart three the ace or king, and you have a weak two at every vulnerability. If the three were the queen, I would open non-vulnerable, and maybe also in first seat vulnerable, but not second seat. Much depends on partnership style — it is important to agree on expected values for these actions.
|
|
Today’s deal from a past national event comes from the last day of the National Swiss Teams, and shows Zia Mahmood in an unfamiliar role as the victim, being the reporter of a fine play against him, rather than the perpetrator, this time.
Both tables in the match between Mahaffey and Schwartz reached six spades with East-West silent. In one room, East doubled the slam, making the play somewhat easier after a heart lead, though in fact declarer lost his way when he played clubs in routine fashion for down one.
In the other room, Jim Mahaffey was not doubled by Mahmood, since it sounded as if North-South were looking for a grand slam, as indeed they were.
Michael Rosenberg still found the heart lead, and Mahmood ruffed, then exited with a diamond. Declarer won, drew trumps ending in hand in two rounds, cashed the heart king, then advanced the club queen. When West played low, Mahaffey decided that since neither opponent had bid, East was relatively unlikely to have more than six diamonds. Accordingly, the club finesse was heavily favored to be offside, but the double club finesse had suddenly become an excellent chance. He needed to find West with only small clubs or the doubleton 10.
He overtook his club queen with the ace, cashed dummy’s two top hearts to pitch his club losers, and ran the club jack, prepared to repeat the finesse if Mahmood covered. Mahmood ducked the club jack, but Mahaffey ran it anyway and brought home his slam.