February 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
We are using resources as if we had two planets, not one. There can be no ‘plan B’ because there is no ‘planet B.’
Ban Ki-Moon
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 7 5
♥ K 9 5 2
♦ A 6 5
♣ 9 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 3
♥ 6
♦ Q 9 8 2
♣ Q J 10 2 |
♠ Q 9 4 2
♥ Q J 4 3
♦ J 7
♣ A 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A 10 8 7
♦ K 10 4 3
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
Does it shock you to bid a second time with “only” 5 points? I hope not, because balancing over two hearts with a call of two no-trump to show the minors looks very reasonable to me. Your partner must have been prepared to hear you bid at least one of the minors when he doubled. You may not buy the perfect dummy, but if nonvulnerable I think the potential reward is clearly worth the risk.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 3
♥ 6
♦ Q 9 8 2
♣ Q J 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Honest bread is very well — it’s the butter that makes the temptation.
Douglas Jerrold
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 8 4 2
♥ Q 3
♦ A 4 2
♣ J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7
♥ A 8 7 6
♦ Q J 10 6
♣ 9 8 5 |
♠ A 6
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ 9 8 7
♣ A 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 5 3
♥ K J 2
♦ K 5 3
♣ K Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Transfer to spades
♦Q
It feels right to lead spades rather than clubs. (The club lead is by no means safe, while the worst a spade can do is lead a suit that declarer could not play for himself.) If you are going to attack spades, the right card is the nine, since you have raised spades and already shown three cards in the suit. Had you not raised, you would lead low.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6 3
♥ K 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ J 9 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
I happened to see your column recently, as a retiree living in Bentonville, Arizona. I have a lot of time on my hands. Do you have any suggestions as to where I might go to learn bridge? I played for a little while in Vietnam, when it helped to keep our mind off other things.
Green Giant, Bentonville, Ariz.
I think the best (and cheapest, and most efficient) way to explore your options is to call 1-800-264-2743. This is the telephone number for ACBL. You can reach a real person who will tell you about clubs in your area. But I also googled Bentonville bridge clubs, and I suspect you may find your answer if you do the same.
In fourth chair, I held ♠ A-J-4, ♥ Q-10-6-3, ♦ Q-J-3, ♣ Q-7-4 at pairs. My partner opened one club, and I responded an invitational two no-trump, figuring I had no ruffing values and hoping to conceal my hand from my opponents if we ended in no-trump. Should my partner with 3-4-3-3 shape and 14 points bid on? The opponents allowed me to take nine tricks, while the rest of the room made nine tricks in hearts (mostly in game).
Lumberjack, Detroit, Mich.
Your partner should surely have accepted the invitation with a good 14. I do not blame you for bidding two no-trump — it may be against the field, but it might still be right (as here), even facing four hearts. As you can see, matchpoints often involves non-bridge considerations.
I notice you play an extremely simple convention card in comparison to most of the world’s other experts. If we were to rewind your clock some 40 years, would you adopt a more sophisticated system? The reason I ask is that I have a hunch that most of today’s conventions work well only half the time. In the long term, there is no gain, no loss. In other words, we’re just as well off without them as with them.
Mike Drop, Albuquerque, N.M.
Even top players who may basically feel the same way about the game itself often differ on specifics in incalculable ways. If given a chance, and I were 40 years younger, I would play a sophisticated relay system, but only with a player who was willing and able to work to learn the methods and iron out all the kinks.
|
I’d welcome your opinion on a recent deal. I held ♠ A-4, ♥ Q-4, ♦ A-10-9-8-6-5-4-3, ♣ 2, with neither side vulnerable. I heard my right-hand opponent open one club in second seat. Would you pre-empt in diamonds, and if so, to what level?
Aces and Spaces, Levittown, Pa.
Non-vulnerable, a jump to four diamonds seems about right. Vulnerable, a call of three diamonds seems sufficient, but it is a blind guess! In situations like this, you do not know if you want the next hand to bid on or not, so it is hard to judge in which direction to try to push them.
I have just formed a new partnership with a player who is somewhat older than I, and to whom I feel I should pay respect. We have a few occasional disasters like everyone, I suppose. The problem is that when we have one or two bad or unlucky hands, my partner loses discipline. What would you tell him? I’m sure this happened to you once or twice, so what did you do in such a position?
Learning Curve, Mitchell, S.D.
I tell my partners: “I don’t mind a disaster, but I do mind the second disaster when you were still thinking about the first. You can’t change the past result, but you can influence the next one!”
|
February 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
To consult the statistician after an experiment is finished is often merely to ask him to conduct a post mortem examination. He can perhaps say what the experiment died of.
Ronald Fisher
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 9 7 5
♥ J 7
♦ A 7 6 5 2
♣ Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ K Q
♦ Q J 8 3
♣ 8 6 3 |
♠ —
♥ A 10 8 6 5 4 3
♦ 9 4
♣ J 9 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 8 6 3 2
♥ 9 2
♦ K 10
♣ A K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♥ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥K
Your partner has invited game, suggesting about 11 HCP and three spades. Your great controls and nice honor structure suggest you have enough to accept the invitation. Your points in your long suits mean that only your weak spade spots might give you a moment’s pause before bidding on.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 6 3 2
♥ 9 2
♦ K 10
♣ A K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
How many things we held yesterday as articles of faith which today we tell as fables.
Michel de Montaigne
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q
♥ A 10 8 7 5
♦ A K 10 9 4
♣ 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 4 2
♥ Q J 4 2
♦ 7 6 5
♣ K 8 |
♠ J 8 6 5 3
♥ 9 3
♦ 8 3
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 9
♥ K 6
♦ Q J 2
♣ A Q 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
The jump to four clubs is not Gerber but a splinter, setting diamonds as trump and showing short clubs. You cannot use Blackwood since you might need to find a heart control to make a small or grand slam, but you can temporize with four diamonds and hope to hear your partner show a heart control.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ A 10 8 7 5
♦ A K 10 9 4
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
I inherited Rome as brick and left it Marble.
Emperor Augustus
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K Q J 10
♥ J 9 4
♦ 6 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5 2
♥ 10 8 7 3
♦ J 9 4 3
♣ J 5 |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ K 6 5 2
♦ —
♣ A Q 9 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ 8 6
♥ A Q
♦ A K Q 10 8 7
♣ K 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
You may be able to construct hands where four spades plays better than three no-trump, but most of those hands are ones where your partner might have raised spades, with three-card support and an open suit. In practice, you will belong in game here most of the time, and the right game will be three no-trump to protect partner’s tenaces on opening lead. So go ahead and bid three no-trump right now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J 10
♥ J 9 4
♦ 6 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Only a Hungarian can go into a revolving door behind you and come out in front of you.
Anonymous
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 6 4 2
♥ Q 10 7 3
♦ 10 6
♣ A 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 5 3
♥ A J 5
♦ J 8 2
♣ K 8 |
♠ K Q
♥ 4
♦ Q 9 7 5 3
♣ 10 9 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ K 9 8 6 2
♦ A K 4
♣ Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All |
| pass |
|
|
|
♠5
You may not have any guarantee that acting is safe, but your shape suggests that it is sensible to balance now with a call of two no-trump. This shows the minors, just as it would if you had bid directly over one heart. Whenever the opponents have a decent fit, as they appear to have here, your side should have at least an eight-card fit as well, so bidding two no-trump carries very little risk.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q
♥ 4
♦ Q 9 7 5 3
♣ 10 9 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Against the disease of writing, one must take special precautions, since it is a dangerous and contagious disease.
Peter Abelard
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 4 3
♥ 10 9 7
♦ A Q 10 7
♣ 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ Q 2
♦ 6 5 4 3
♣ K Q 10 9 |
♠ Q J 6 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 8
♣ A J 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9
♥ A K J 8 5
♦ K J 9 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Although you are at the lower end of the range for this call, this hand is clearly worth a raise to three clubs, a bid that is somewhere between a courtesy raise and a genuine invitation. The raise covers both hand types, but you can easily see that a hand 5-5 in the minors should offer decent play for 11 tricks.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 8
♣ A J 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
To no man will we sell, or deny, or delay, right or justice.
Magna Carta
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 10 5 2
♥ K 3
♦ 8 4 3 2
♣ A 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ A 9 8 6 2
♦ K Q J
♣ 10 7 4 2 |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ A 9 7 5
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 7 3
♥ Q 5
♦ 10 6
♣ K Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
If you have to find your partner with length in diamonds or spades, the odds surely favor him holding diamonds, not spades. If he had spades, after all, he might have overcalled in that suit. Yes you need less in spades, but the odds favor the other approach.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 2
♥ 10 6 2
♦ J 4 3
♣ Q 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 21st, 2018
|
Recently, I held ♠ 10-2, ♥ A-Q-J-3-2, ♦ K-4, ♣ A-Q-3-2, and because I was worried about protecting my diamond king, I was tempted to open one no-trump rather than risking a one-heart call and hearing a response of one no-trump. What do you think about the general principle here?
Melting Moments, Taos, N.M.
I would never open one no-trump with a 5-4 pattern that includes a chunky five-card major, and would think it a major distortion of my hand to do so. Note that unprotecting your small doubleton spade is just as inelegant as protecting your doubleton king — which may not need protecting at all. A 5-4 pattern with a major is not a balanced hand, especially this hand.
I managed to pull two cards out of my hand simultaneously in the same suit, and the tournament director explained that this was only a minor penalty card, not a major penalty card. This is a new one on me, so I hope you will explain how the rules work.
Bumble Bee, Newark, N.J.
When two cards are played simultaneously or a card is dropped, and the exposed card is not an honor, you trigger the minor penalty-card rules. In such instances, the player must play the exposed card before any other non-honor card of the same suit. So you could play or discard the heart jack, but not the heart three, before (say) an exposed heart seven.
If your agreed style is to bid majors before diamonds in response to one club, what happens if you hold a 4-6 shape with clubs and a major, and you open one club and hear a one-diamond response? Should you bid the major or does it depend on suit quality?
Overpass, Corpus Christi, Texas
As opener, I would bid my major rather than repeat my clubs, almost no matter how weak the major and how strong my clubs. An exception might be to bypass an honorless major in favor of repeating a good six-card club suit. But even then, you might lose your 4-4 fit.
|
Do you have any simple rules as to what sort of hand passes over an opening bid, then comes into a live auction (i.e., not in the balancing seat) at his next turn? I’m contrasting what it means to pass then double after hearing one club to your right, one heart to your left and two clubs to your right.
Stepping Stone, Greenville, S.C.
Passing then reopening in the balancing seat conveys no special message, as you said. But backing into a live auction — as in the sequence quoted — when responder could still have a good hand, guarantees length in opener’s first-bid suit. Since you must have a good hand to act; you should have length in opener’s suit, or you would already have bid. Typically, you would be close to 4-1-4-4 with opening values.
When you open one club and raise partner’s one spade to two spades, with ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2, how would you bid on over a call of three diamonds from your partner?
Lumpfish, Wausau, Wis.
A simple raise to four spades looks right. You have a minimum, but if partner has length in diamonds, your holding looks ideal. Switch your red suits, and you should sign off in three spades since honor-third is not a great holding if partner needs help. By contrast, honor-doubleton lets your partner ruff the suit in your hand.
|
|
When South opens one no-trump, North uses Stayman and sets the contract in four hearts. On the lead of the club queen, East flies up with the ace and continues the suit. Declarer wins the king and has to decide on a plan. What would you do in his position?
You appear to have a loser in each red suit and two in clubs. How are you going to reduce four losers to three? Your best bet appears to be the spade finesse. After winning the club king, cross to the diamond ace and take the spade finesse. If it loses, you may go two down in your game, but this is a risk you should be prepared to take. When the finesse wins, you unblock spades, cross to the heart king, pitch your club loser on the spades and lead a second trump. If East follows low, you can afford the safety play of the finesse, since if this loses to the queen or jack, you can regain the lead and draw the last trump. If East splits his honors, you win the ace and play the king and another diamond, and the defenders score only one diamond and one trump trick.
Well played, but have you noticed an unusual resource available to the defense? If East ducks his club ace at the first trick, the defenders retain the upper hand. If declarer embarks on the same line as above, East still has an entry to keep South from scoring his trumps separately. No matter what declarer tries, the defense has a countermeasure.