October 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 29th, 2017
O but we dreamed to mend Whatever mischief seemed To afflict mankind.
W. B. Yeats
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 5
♥ Q J
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ A J 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10 3 2
♥ K 4
♦ J 9 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 10 9 7 5 3
♦ 7 5
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7 6
♥ A 8 6 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣7
We haven’t discussed ‘inverted minors’ for a while. Here a raise to two diamonds by an unpassed hand in a non-competitive auction is natural and forcing for at least one round. Unless either defender limits their hand with a re-raise to three diamonds, or with a call of two no-trump, the auction becomes game forcing. This is surely the best way to explore for a possible slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ Q J
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ A J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 28th, 2017
Thinking is to me the greatest fatigue in the world.
Sir John Vanbrugh
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K J 8 4 3
♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ 6 2
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 7 5 4 3
♣ J 7 6 5 4 3 |
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ J
♦ K J 10 9 8
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6 5 2
♥ A K Q 10 9 8
♦ A
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣5
Raise to three clubs, as much to keep the opponents quiet as to make a real try for game. Here the fact that you raise partner’s suit, rather than making a stronger try via a cuebid, should indicate to your partner that you have more of a courtesy raise than a really strong hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ 2
♦ K J 10 9 8
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 27th, 2017
The events in our lives happen in a sequence in time, but in their significance to ourselves they find their own order the continuous thread of revelation.
Eudora Welty
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 7 6 2
♥ 6
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 3
♥ 9 5 4
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ Q 10 6 |
♠ Q 10 8 5 4
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 9 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ 9
♥ A K Q 8 3
♦ 5 4
♣ A J 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ * |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*natural and forcing
♦7
As someone who frequently espouses the virtues of fourth suit as an artificial rather than natural call, I’m pleased to tell you that on this occasion the fourth suit is natural and non-forcing. (For the record, though, had you opened one club, using two diamonds here would be strong and artificial.) This is one of the good reasons for opening one diamond with this shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6 2
♥ 6
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 26th, 2017
The robbed that smiles steals something from the thief.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 9 5
♥ K 6
♦ K J 6
♣ Q J 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ A 8 5 |
♠ 7 6 3
♥ 10 8 7 4 2
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 2
♥ A J 5
♦ A 8 4
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦3
This doesn’t feel like a hand on which it is sensible to play for penalty. Your weak diamond spots may not stop declarer scoring all his trumps in hand. But you have to bid, and even if you don’t have a classical diamond control you do have enough length in the suit to make the practical call of one no-trump. That gets your values across nicely to partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4
♥ Q 9 3
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ A 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 25th, 2017
This world where much is to be done and little to be known.
Samuel Johnson
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 5
♥ K 10 8
♦ K 8 4
♣ A Q 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 4 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ 10 9 3
♣ 6 3 |
♠ J 7 3
♥ 7 5 4 3
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ K 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ Q J 6
♦ A 7 2
♣ J 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
I can see an argument for a passive club lead – the fact that your partner has not doubled for a club lead should not affect that decision, since you know he is relatively limited. That said, I think I prefer a spade lead, since dummy has by no means guaranteed four spades. I think my second choice would be a diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3 2
♥ A 4
♦ K 8 5 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
October 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 24th, 2017
|
In a recent lead problem where you had a six-count, you advised attacking from queen-third in an unbid major against a no-trump contract. Would it be better to lead low or high? I worry about blocking the suit and misleading my partner that I have a four-card suit. As an aside, what about leading from a doubleton queen – would you suggest low or high?
Bow at a Venture, Manhattan, N.Y.
I’d always lead low from three to an honor; it might conceivably block the suit, but here your partner has plenty of high-cards, so this will be only a minor problem. By contrast, leading an unsupported honor might cost a trick in so many different ways — especially in an unbid suit. From a doubleton honor I lead the honor in partner’s bid suit, and try not to lead it at all if it is not.
I do not understand the implied contradiction between your statement in a recent answer that, if missing four cards, a 3-1 break is more likely than a 2-2 break, since you also say: play for the drop when missing four cards to the queen. How can you reconcile the two ideas?
Number Cruncher, Ketchikan, Alaska
In general terms a 3-1 break is more likely than a 2-2 break. But when deciding whether to finesse on the second round with a nine-card holding, you normally reach a position where one defender has followed twice, so you must halve that original 3-1 percentage. I should emphasize how close the original percentages are, though. Any known shortness or length in your opponents’ hands may tip you to the finesse.
Holding ♠ K-9, ♥ Q-4-3, ♦ A-J-4-2, ♣ Q-7-4-3 I heard my partner open one club and I responded one diamond. What would you do when your partner raises to three diamonds? Should you settle for three no-trump, show a major in the hope of reaching three no-trump when it is right, or look for slam?
Flat Earther, San Francisco, Calif.
Your soft values suggest bidding three no-trump, as if partner is short in one major, so that your values there are wasted, you may not make any game. If I did explore, I guess I would bid three spades. I really think it is just a guess, and the three no-trump call is the best of a bad job.
|
In third seat opening light in a major suit seems protected by the fact that your partner has Drury available. But should a third-seat opening in a minor be very close to opening bid strength? And where there is a choice, would opening a reasonable four-card major be a better choice?
Pushing the Boat Out, Doylestown, Pa.
With hands in the 10-12 range, open a good suit if you have one, planning to pass as soon as is sensible. With a full if minimum opener in the range 12-14, I tend to make my normal opening bid, planning to keep the auction open. A lead directer with a four-card major is relatively unusual though not absurd, of course. Pass balanced 10-counts unless you know what you want partner to lead.
With strong balanced hands is it logical to extend the three-point range approach, so that after opening two clubs a rebid of two no-trump shows 22-24 and a rebid of three no-trump shows 25-27? Also, what should a three no-trump opener show? A balanced powerhouse, or gambling with a long minor?
Tiers, Before Bedtime, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
Use three-point ranges for a one no-trump opening and rebid. You can invite facing those sequences, but you have to put up or shut up facing a two no-trump opening or rebid. Perhaps use an upper limit of 17 with no five-card suit for a one no-trump opener, and a good 11 to a bad 14 for the one no-trump rebid if you want to be daring. Use two point ranges for the higher actions. If you play the Kokish two heart rebid (see https://www.larryco.com/bridge-learning-center/detail/573) you can have your cake and eat it too.
|
October 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 23rd, 2017
The wise man bridges the gap by laying out the path by means of which he can get from where he is to where he wants to go.
J. P. Morgan
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 5
♥ A J 5 3
♦ K 7 4 3
♣ Q J 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4 2
♥ K Q
♦ A J 10 9 8 2
♣ 10 2 |
♠ K 7
♥ 10 9 8 7
♦ Q 6 5
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 8 6 3
♥ 6 4 2
♦ —
♣ A K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
A simple option would be to drive to four hearts, but that seems a real overbid to me, since you may be short on both trumps and high cards. I’m not sure I like a call of two no-trump either, with this spade weakness. So what does that leave? Maybe a game-try of three diamonds. I’ll accept partner’s sign off, or if he chooses to bid three no-trump or four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5
♥ A J 5 3
♦ K 7 4 3
♣ Q J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 22nd, 2017
’I’m word famous,’ Dr. Parks said ‘all over Canada.’
Mordecai Richler
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ 9 7 5
♦ A J 9 3
♣ A Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ Q 7 5
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
♠ A 9 5 3
♥ K Q 10 8 6
♦ 6
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 6 2
♥ A
♦ K 10 8 4 2
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
| 3 ♥ ** |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
**short hearts both minors
♥3
This is a penalty double not a responsive double. Clearly West is playing a little joke with heart support, and the issue is whether to pass and bid spades later or raise spades at once. With so little defense to hearts and a good if minimum hand for spades, I think a raise to two spades ensures we get our message across in good time.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 6 2
♥ A
♦ K 10 8 4 2
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 21st, 2017
Rarely, rarely, comest thou, Spirit of Delight!
Percy Bysshe Shelley
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K J 10 2
♥ K J 7 4 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 6
♦ A 10 9 8 6
♣ A K 10 2 |
♠ Q 6 3
♥ Q 10 5 2
♦ K Q J 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 8
♥ A 9 8
♦ 7 5 4
♣ J 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♠ * |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Both minors, 11-15
♣K
I would once said have bidding two clubs was obvious. I’m not so sure, any more, given how often players double on offshape hands with both majors and short clubs. Since pass here is neutral, not an attempt to play, I will pass and let partner pick a suit. If he selects hearts that is fine by me, if spades I can remove to two clubs, implying no great confidence that this is our best spot.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8
♥ A 9 8
♦ 7 5 4
♣ J 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 20th, 2017
Courage consists not in blindly overlooking danger, but in seeing it, and conquering it.
Jean Paul
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 9 7
♥ A
♦ K J 9 6 2
♣ A 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3
♥ K Q J 8 5 4 2
♦ —
♣ Q 10 6 3 |
♠ 4 2
♥ 3
♦ A Q 10 7 5 3
♣ K J 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 8 5
♥ 10 9 7 6
♦ 8 4
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥K
Sometimes it is best to bid what is in front of you. Your partner has suggested five good clubs (or maybe even a poor six-card suit) in a balanced 12-14 hand. If you were only allowed to make one bid wouldn’t you jump to six clubs? You might make a grand slam, or find the small slam was on a finesse, but here you should just settle for simplicity and bid the small slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 7
♥ A
♦ K J 9 6 2
♣ A 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
After today’s deal South must have felt not only that he had earned 14 IMPs for his side, but that he had scored a palpable hit on his opponent. While the defenders often have to disguise their holdings, an excellent declarer can participate in the game of bluff and double-bluff.
In the qualifying rounds of the 1989 Bermuda Bowl France played Chinese Taipei, and Patrick Huang as South declared six no-trump. On Christian Mari’s club lead, Huang won in hand and led a spade to the queen, then took five rounds of diamonds. Mari’s first discard was a low heart, then a low spade. Now Huang cashed his four clubs, on the last of which Mari threw the spade jack. With one spade and two hearts in each hand, Huang had reduced to an ending known as a strip-squeeze, where he had forced West, with a tenace in one suit, hearts, and winners in another, spades, to weaken his holding fatally in one of those suits. All declarer had to do was guess which.
Huang could have exited with a spade, hoping Mari would be left with two hearts and the spade ace, and would have to concede the rest to him. Or he could have taken the heart finesse, which would have turned out even worse. Instead, he decided that Mari’s discards were what a very good player would do if he could see he was going to have to bare his heart king sooner or later. So he played a heart to the ace.
Very nicely done by both sides.