October 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 19th, 2017
Is there in the whole world a being who would have the right to forgive and could forgive?
Fedor Dostoevsky
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 6
♥ A 8 4
♦ A K J 7 4
♣ Q J 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 8 5
♥ Q 10 9
♦ 10 2
♣ 8 7 |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ K J 6 5
♦ Q 9 6
♣ 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 4 2
♥ 7 3 2
♦ 8 5 3
♣ A K 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ * |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*guaranteeing values
♠K
A negative double promises four spades here (and unlike when you double one spade you rarely cheat here with three). So what are the options? A stopperless one no-trump response does not appeal, which leaves a club raise. With a choice between two hearts as a limit raise or better, or a two club call, I go high – albeit with misgivings. (comments?)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4 2
♥ 7 3 2
♦ 8 5 3
♣ A K 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 2nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 18th, 2017
We are all strong enough to bear the misfortunes of others.
Duc de Rochefoucauld
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 6 3
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ K 8 6 4
♣ A Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8 4
♥ J 9 6 2
♦ 9 3
♣ J 6 2 |
♠ 9 5 2
♥ 7
♦ J 10 5 2
♣ 9 8 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7
♥ K Q 4 3
♦ A Q 7
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*agreeing hearts
♠J
Spades seems to be our partnership’s long suit so I would lead that. But please, please, do not lead the eight or 10 here. With dummy quite likely to have a doubleton and declarer four, do not throw away your side’s assets to clear up hypothetical ambiguity for partner. Lead low from three unless you know it to be wrong – and you cannot be sure of that here.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 5
♥ J 8
♦ K 8 4 3
♣ Q 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 17th, 2017
|
Has there been any change in the structure of the major tournaments around the world? Are all the world championships still taking place – and have any been added recently?
Top of the World, Bellevue, Wash.
The major titles run on a four-year cycle, with odd years having the Bermuda Bowl, plus Venice Cup and D’Orsi Trophy for women and seniors respectively. Junior events now include separate fields for under-21 and young women. A school children’s event has very recently been added. The even years alternate between the Olympiad (with the same three categories), and an event open to everyone where there are both teams and pairs events.
My partner opened one spade, to which I respond one no-trump with 10 points and the Q-9 of spades, and six diamonds to the ace, since we were playing two over one almost game forcing. She rebid her spades and I raised to three, thinking I had more than enough to invite game. My partner claimed she was simply showing me a minimum hand, and that I was compelled to pass now. Could you comment please?
Brake Pads, Seneca, S.C.
Over the forcing no-trump, with a minimum or moderate hand, opener bids a second, cheap, suit if she has one (occasionally a three-card minor if no four-card suit is available) or rebids a six-card suit. Opener’s rebid of his suit limits the hand by his failure to jump but is entirely consistent with up to 15 points. So your second-round choice actually appears to have been between a raise to three or four spades.
Earlier this month you used a term I’m not familiar with in your answer to a letter. Who or what is an advancer?
Moving on up, Great Falls, Mont.
In times gone by, bridge terminology was both more ornate and less precise, with the use of the word ‘responder’ to describe the partner of both an opening bidder and an overcaller. These days I have picked up on a usage from Bridge World of calling overcaller’s partner ‘advancer’. It is unambiguous if not yet in completely common parlance.
|
What would you open with ♠ A, ♥ A-9-4, ♦ A-J-10-9-8-4, ♣ A-K-2? I toyed with opening two no-trump but settled for one diamond. I heard one spade to my left, pass from partner, two spades to the right. What now? At the table facing the red kings and a doubleton club, five diamonds was easy and six diamonds about as good as three no-trump!
Scot Free, Durham, N.C.
I’d double two spades, whereupon a number of good things can happen – if partner passes, raises diamonds or bids hearts. If he bids three clubs I correct to three diamonds and hope to continue the dialogue. A direct two no-trump call feels completely wrong to me, and three diamonds doesn’t begin to tell the story here.
Quite recently you advocated playing an almost forcing no-trump response to a major. How does that gybe with the responding hand having three trump and a limit raise? Might you not end up in an inferior partscore or even miss game?
Devil in the Details, Memphis, Tenn.
My preferred solution forces opener not to pass one no-trump if he has extra shape or values, so game is unlikely to be bid (or made) if opener has the hand to pass one no-trump — since he would reject a limit raise. If you want to put responder’s unbalanced three-card limit raises through the direct jump to three, then you should never play a ridiculous one no-trump contract. If one no-trump goes down facing a balanced hand, three of the major might also not have made.
|
September 30th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 16th, 2017
I could be might foolish but think myself mighty witty: Reason still keeps its throne but it nods a little, that’s all.
George Farquhar
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ —
♥ A 5 4 3
♦ 6 4 3
♣ A J 10 8 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 9 7 6
♦ K 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 3 |
♠ A Q J 10 6 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ J 7 2
♣ 5 |
| South |
♠ K 8 5 3
♥ K J 8
♦ A Q
♣ K Q 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠9
Despite the fact that you have longer diamonds than hearts, I would respond in hearts initially. My plan would be to compete in diamonds if the opponents bid on in a black suit. If you respond in diamonds you may find yourself obligated to bid hearts at your next turn. Incidentally, by bidding a major before a minor you suggest this sort of canape shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 9 7 6
♦ K 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 29th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 15th, 2017
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 3
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A K 8 6 5 2
♣ 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 4 2
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 10 9 4
♣ J 9 |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ K 9 8 5
♦ J
♣ Q 10 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 5
♥ A Q J 3
♦ 7 3
♣ A K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
A raise to two spades cannot be criticized. Still, if the simple raise to two might be this hand or the same hand with a small heart instead of the king, it can be very hard to compete constructively or reach game. One way to distinguish between raises here is to use the direct raise as weaker, and subvert a call of two clubs to show a constructive raise to two spades – say 7-9 points. With more, redouble.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6
♥ K 9 8 5
♦ 9
♣ Q 10 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 28th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 14th, 2017
What is a better way to prove that your methods work than by winning? I have proved that my methods work.
Bela Karolyi
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 3
♥ K J 7 6
♦ A Q 4
♣ K 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4 2
♥ 10 8 4 3
♦ 9 8 6 2
♣ 10 8 |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ Q 9
♦ 10 5 3
♣ Q J 9 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 6 5
♥ A 5 2
♦ K J 7
♣ A 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦9
In unfamiliar partnerships there is often a question of what is forcing here. A simple rule (if not playing the Wolff signoff) is to play that the only way to stay out of game is to pass two no-trump. So the three spade call is forcing; if you play new minor or the like it would show six. With a balanced minimum, despite your great trumps, I would simply raise to four spades, rather than cuebid four diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 3
♥ K J 7 6
♦ A Q 4
♣ K 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 27th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 13th, 2017
O O O That Shakesperehian Rag It’s so elegant So intelligent.
T. S. Eliot
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 5
♥ 9 8 3
♦ A K 8
♣ K J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ A K J 5 4 2
♦ 5 2
♣ 6 5 4 3 |
♠ J 10 8 6 2
♥ Q 10 6
♦ Q 9 7 6
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 4 3
♥ 7
♦ J 10 4 3
♣ A Q 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Your partner cannot have a single-suited diamond hand or he would have acted at his second turn. You cannot commit to no-trump or you might find yourself off the club suit; but are you supposed to raise diamonds to try to cater for a possible 5-3 spade fit, or jump to five clubs to show shortage and a slam try? I might do that were my heart queen the king, but as it is, I’ll just bid four diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8 6 2
♥ Q 10 6
♦ Q 9 7 6
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 12th, 2017
And the gates of it shall not be shut at all by day: for there shall be no night there.
Revelations, New Testament
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K
♥ Q J 10 9 5 3
♦ 6 3
♣ K 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 5 3 2
♥ 4
♦ 8 7 5 4 2
♣ J 9 |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ 7 6 2
♦ J 10 9
♣ A Q 10 7 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ A K 8
♦ A K Q
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦8
Without the double, you would have responded one spade, of course, in an attempt to improve the contract. But when the opponents double, it is less certain that it is your hand, and there is clearly less reason to bid, since West is about to take you off the hook. I would pass now, both to slow partner down if he has a good hand and in the hope of getting a chance to back in later, if appropriate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5 3 2
♥ 4
♦ 8 7 5 4 2
♣ J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 11th, 2017
No-one gets an iron-clad guarantee of success. Certainly, factors like opportunity, luck and timing are important. But the backbone of success is usually found in old-fashioned, basic concepts like hard work, determination, good planning and perseverance.
Mia Hamm
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ A K J 5 3
♣ 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ 7 6 3
♦ 10 8
♣ A 9 8 7 |
♠ K J 9 8 7
♥ 5
♦ Q 9 7 2
♣ Q J 10 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ A K J 10 9 4
♦ 6 4
♣ K 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
Your partner took no part in the auction so he surely does not have a decent red suit and values. If he did, he would have bid. Maybe the best chance to beat the game is to lead a club and hope declarer has only three? At pairs this hand is even harder, since a club lead is quite likely to cost a trick. I might lead the heart seven and hope to hit my partner’s length.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 4 2
♥ 7 2
♦ J 9
♣ K 10 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
September 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 10th, 2017
|
I was in fourth seat with: ♠ K-4-3, ♥ 8-2, ♦ 10-7-4, ♣ K-Q-6-3-2. I heard a weak two hearts on my left, doubled by my partner. I saw no reason to bid more than three clubs, and played there, missing a decent, and making, game in no-trump when my partner had 16 points with all four aces. What should I have done?
An Unsuitable Boy, Provo, Utah
If two no-trump was available as natural, I might have risked that call. The modern expert solution to this problem is to give up a natural two no-trump call, and to use it as a transfer to three clubs (to show a weak hand in clubs or diamonds) while a direct call of three of a minor promises values – a call you would only just be worth. This is an extension of a popular convention called Lebensohl.
I thought I had a difficult call in a team game holding ♠ J-2, ♥ Q-J-9-4, ♦ A-K, ♣ K-10-6-3-2, after hearing a one diamond opening bid to my right. I could not sensibly overcall in either of my suits, could I? And bidding one no-trump seemed out of range and flawed for many other reasons.
Frozen Solid, Portland, Ore.
I agree that the one no-trump call seems wrong, but I suppose you could persuade me otherwise were the spade jack the queen. Then, if doubled, I would probably run to two clubs. As it is, I will pass and hope to get the chance to double spades for take-out at my second turn. If forced to bid, maybe an overcall of one heart might not be the worst bid in the world.
If using fourth suit forcing, do you recommend any differences in the specific case of fourth-suit forcing at the one level after one club – one diamond – one heart? Might this be treated as other than forcing to game? In that case two spades would be game forcing but not necessarily spades.
Seeking Symbiosis, Texarkana, Texas
This is the way that I have been playing fourth suit forcing for many years. The only suggestion I would offer is that in this sequence the one spade call is only forcing for one round, and when followed by minimum action is invitational; but jumps create a game force. Equally responder’s direct jump to two spades specifically denies as many as four spades.
|
I am dipping my toe into the waters of playing 2/1 game forcing. Where do you stand on playing responder’s bid of one no-trump facing a major-suit opener: forcing, semiforcing or non-forcing?
Baby Steps, Bristol, Va.
I prefer that responder never bids one no-trump with more than a dead minimum opener — say a balanced 13 HCP and no five-card suit. That allows opener to pass with a balanced and dead minimum hand. With as much as 14 HCP, he should introduce a three-card minor. If you play Flannery (so opener never has the problem of what to do with a minimum hand with 4-5 in the majors) you get the best of almost every world.
You said you would elaborate on showing minors in response to a two no-trump opener. I’m holding your feet to the fire, if I may for your idea of the best methods out there.
The Waiting Game, Worcester, Mass.
One possibility is to play three spades as Minor-suit Stayman (now over three no-trump, denying a minor, opener shows a five-card minor with the majors being shortness and 5-5 pattern). This requires you to use Stayman with a one-suiter in a minor. An alternative is to use three spades as a puppet to three no-trump, after which one-suited minors bid the other minor. Calls of four hearts and four spades show the 5-4 minor hands, four no-trump show five-five minors.
|
|
Sometimes the cards allow for a slight inaccuracy, sometimes they are in unforgiving mood. Here they showed mercy to declarer.
In the qualifying rounds of the 1996 World Olympiad South Africa appeared to be heading for a big win until this deal came along.
In the closed room West opened two spades and the South African North bid three diamonds. South converted to three no-trump and West led two rounds of spades then accurately shifted to hearts; when declarer lost the diamond finesse, that meant two down.
On vugraph Krzysztof Martens as North doubled two spades, and that led to a contract of five clubs. Again an initial heart lead is best — but few of us could resist leading a spade with the West hand. Marek Szymanowski won this and had to find the best way forward – on the reasonable assumption that trumps might split badly but that diamonds would not, since West had not led a singleton.
At the table, Szymanowski finessed in diamonds at trick two. Now if trumps had been 4-1 a trump return would have left him without the communications to get 11 tricks. Unlikely as it might seem, you are much better placed to take a spade ruff at trick two and then lead a low diamond from dummy. If East wins and forces you again, then ruff and play two rounds of trump overtaking in hand. Even if trumps are 4-1 you can still come home by playing four rounds of trumps to East, pitching dummy’s hearts.