November 16th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, November 3rd, 2017
Paradox has been defined as ‘Truth standing on her head to get attention.’
G.K. Chesterton
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K
♥ K 10 7
♦ Q 9 8 3 2
♣ K 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ Q 9 6 4 3 2
♦ J
♣ A J 10 4 |
♠ A J 9 8 7 4 3
♥ 8 5
♦ —
♣ Q 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 2
♥ A J
♦ A K 10 7 6 5 4
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
4 ♠ |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
Sometimes you have to close your eyes and guess. Here, my best guess would be to bid slam rather than introducing my suit at the five-level or raising partner to five. I would bid six spades rather than six diamonds, since as little as ace-king-fifth of spades appears to give partner some sort of play in slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ A J
♦ A K 10 7 6 5 4
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
5 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 15th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, November 2nd, 2017
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
Martin Luther King Jr
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 10 2
♥ A Q 9 8 3
♦ A Q J 9
♣ 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ 5 4
♣ A 7 5 4 3 |
♠ A J 9 8 4
♥ K J
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7 5
♥ 10 6
♦ K 10 6
♣ K Q J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
Whether or not you play two-over-one as forcing in an uncompetitive auction, almost everyone would play this sequence as invitational, but not forcing. With a better hand, your partner would have to cue-bid on his second turn. That said, you have enough to bid three no-trump now. You may not make it, but you have too much in hand to pass out three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ A Q 9 8 3
♦ A Q J 9
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 14th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, November 1st, 2017
Exceptions are the exceptions, and finds are like ants; whenever you see one, you may be sure there are twenty.
Anne Fortier
| l |
North |
|
♠ A 7 6 5 4
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ 9
♣ 10 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 3
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 7 6 5
♣ K Q J 7 2 |
♠ 8
♥ A K Q 10 8
♦ A Q 8 4 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 2
♥—
♦ K J 10 3
♣ A 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
5 ♥ |
| 5 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
This answer is partly about style and partly about judgment. I’d like to rebid two spades here, even if it suggests six — which in my style, it does not. A bid of three of a minor should show either five cards or extras. Even worse, it might lose us our fit in the fourth suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 9 2
♥ —
♦ K J 10 3
♣ A 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, October 31st, 2017
Do you think I can listen all day to such stuff? Be off, or I’ll kick you downstairs!
Lewis Carroll
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 7 3
♥ A Q 6 5 4
♦ 9 6 2
♣ Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ J 8
♦ K 7 3
♣ A 8 6 4 3 2 |
♠ K 9 6
♥ 9 7 2
♦ Q J 8 4
♣ J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q 8 4 2
♥ K 10 3
♦ A 10 5
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦* |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♦3
This hand seems to be at the very bottom of the threshold for a jump to three hearts. The spade fragment may be useful facing shortness, and it is easy to imagine making game facing an opening bid with a singleton spade. If you play that your take-out doubles normally deliver shape-suitable openers, as you should, then your hand is just worth this action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 3
♥ A Q 6 5 4
♦ 9 6 2
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 30th, 2017
’Forward the Light Brigade!’ Was there a man dismayed?
Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 4 2
♥ K J 8 4 3
♦ 6 5
♣ A 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7 5 3
♥ A 10 7 6 5
♦ 3
♣ 10 2 |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ Q 9 2
♦ J 10 8 7
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ —
♦ A K Q 9 4 2
♣ K Q J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 7 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Ace and king, in different suits or three kings
♣10
With a choice of four evils, try the least offensive one. Neither major seems like a good idea, though a heart might turn out to be passive. Spades are especially dangerous with known length on my left. Since partner didn’t double clubs, I’ll lead a low diamond and keep my fingers crossed.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 3 2
♥ J 7 2
♦ A 7 4
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
November 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 29th, 2017
|
Could you please comment on the term “masterminding”? I’m assuming that this is a bad thing.
Florida Sunfish, Naples, Fla.
The term is used when the non-captain of the hand overrules his partner without a good reason. Typically, it arises when you make a limit raise or preempt, or even open or rebid at no-trump, but then bid again. Sometimes your partner will make a call that allows you to act again in such auctions, but more commonly when you define your range, you transfer the final decision to your partner.
A week ago in an unopposed auction opener had a strong hand with four hearts and a stiff diamond, so he opened one club and jumped to four diamonds over a one heart response. I always thought that a splinter in this case would be a jump to three diamonds, since a call of two diamonds would be a reverse and therefore forcing. Equally, if four diamonds is the splinter, then what would a three diamond bid mean?
Jump to it, Wilmington, N.C.
Your question opens a can of worms. Yes you should not play three diamonds as natural, but even in sophisticated partnership a jump to three diamonds may remain undefined. Some play it as a splinter that is only forcing as far as three of the major – as good a use as any. So four diamonds guarantees more values.
Can you give me your opinion as to what I should be considering on opening lead if my RHO opens either with a preempt or with a one-level call, and it is passed out? I’m assuming you don’t have an obvious sequence or shortage to lead.
Point of Attack, Dodge City, Kan.
There are two separate questions here. After a preempt is passed out, dummy rates to be strong, and partner rates not to have too much in the unbid major(s). There is little to choose between leading from honor-third or honor-fifth, for example. After a one-level opening is passed out, dummy rates to be weak, declarer strong. So now leading from a king is less attractive than from a queen or jack, everything else being equal. Side suit shortage such as a doubleton will be attractive unless looking at natural trump tricks.
|
Last week I passed in second seat holding: ♠ Q-4, ♥ A-Q-10-3-2, ♦ 8-4-3-2, ♣ K-3. Do you agree? When my partner opened one diamond in third seat, and the next hand overcalled one spade, I seemed to have an embarrassment of choices. What would you recommend?
Catching up, Wheaton, Ill.
Your initial pass was fine (move the spade queen into the diamonds and I might act). Now your first choice might be to bid two hearts, expecting to come again even at the four level. The problem is that if the opponents preempt in spades you may have to guess what to do, when you haven’t shown diamond support. Perhaps a fit jump to three hearts (promising four diamonds) might be worth the risk. I won’t let the opponents play undoubled if they compete to three or four spades.
Will you please explain the correct procedure to follow with announcements as opposed to alerts – are the latter now out of date? If not, what are the sequences where you are supposed to speak?
Talk Soup, Waterbury, Conn.
The majority of alertable calls below the level of three no-trump still do indeed require an alert, not an announcement. With a forcing or semi-forcing no-trump response, a transfer response to one no-trump or an opening no-trump, the partner of the bidder should announce what the call means, rather than simply alerting. The idea is simply to save time; but failing to follow the precise requirements won’t cause a problem. Failure to alert a conventional call promptly may cause far more inconvenience though.
|
November 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, October 28th, 2017
I have a lifetime appointment and I intend to serve it. I expect to die at 110, shot by a jealous husband.
Thurgood Marshall
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 9 5 3
♥ 8 4
♦ A 5 4 3
♣ J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4
♥ K 6 5 2
♦ —
♣ K Q 9 8 5 4 2 |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ J 10 9 3
♦ K Q
♣ A 10 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 8 7 2
♥ A Q 7
♦ J 10 9 8 7 6 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All |
| pass |
|
|
|
♣K
If you play 2/1 game forcing, you are already in a game force, of course. The two heart bid suggests weak length with no convenient call. You cannot bid no-trump without a stopper, and raising clubs would show three, so all that is left is a two spade call. This does not guarantee six, and at least your main values are here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 5 3
♥ 8 4
♦ A 5 4 3
♣ J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 27th, 2017
Though mean Our object and inglorious, yet the end Was not ignoble.
William Wordsworth
| N |
North |
|
♠ A 6 5
♥ A K 3
♦ A Q J 10 8 7 5
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ Q 10 8 5 2
♦ 9 3
♣ K Q 10 |
♠ K 2
♥ 4
♦ 6 4 2
♣ A 8 6 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 8 7
♥ J 9 7 6
♦ K
♣ J 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
3 ♣ |
| 3 ♠ |
4 ♣ |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
♣K
Even with the knowledge that your RHO holds a spade stopper or two, it seems cowardly to pass here. I’m torn between bidding two spades and three clubs. I go for the two spade bid, on the basis that partner can revert to clubs with five spades and two clubs – he knows that you have only two spades and at least six clubs, doesn’t he?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 2
♥ 4
♦ 6 4 2
♣ A 8 6 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, October 26th, 2017
There is endless merit in a man’s knowing when to have done.
Thomas Carlyle
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 9 4 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ 8 4
♣ 9 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ 8 5 2
♦ Q J 10 9 2
♣ A |
♠ K 8 6
♥ K 7 4 3
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ A J 6
♦ A 5
♣ K Q J 10 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Rdbl. |
2 ♦ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
The jump to three clubs sets up a game force, so there is no need to bid more than three diamonds now. Let partner produce his heart raise or probe for three no-trump at his next turn without taking away any space. Jumping to four diamonds might leave him awkwardly placed.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 6
♥ K 7 4 3
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 25th, 2017
Canada is an interesting place; the rest of the world thinks so, even if Canadians don’t.
Terence M. Green
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 9 7
♥ K 9
♦ A Q 6
♣ A Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8
♥ A Q 10 4 3
♦ K 9 8 5 3 2
♣ — |
♠ 10 5 2
♥ 6 2
♦ J 10 4
♣ K 8 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K 6 4 3
♥ J 8 7 5
♦ 7
♣ J 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦5
When your partner cannot bid more than three spades, your side is highly unlikely to have a good slam. Even if partner has a maximum and the club finesse works, you might run into club ruffs. Just raise to four spades and hope partner can make it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 7
♥ K 9
♦ A Q 6
♣ A Q 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Bob Hamman’s frequently repeated saying that the best play lousy and the rest play worse may be supported by what might appear to be an absurd series of results here. But some deals are just too challenging for ordinary mortals.
This deal comes from Salt Lake City 15 years ago. Where I was watching, Nicholas Gartaganis for Canada opened three spades as East, and Jacek Pszczola overcalled three no-trump. His partner, Michal Kwiecien, raised to four no-trump, and that ended the auction for plus-460. Nicely bid — but not all the other pairs were so reticent. In fact, the potential for swings was huge, since in all four matches of the playoffs and finals, one table opened the East hand four spades, and South overcalled five diamonds and was raised to six diamonds by North. With two aces to cash, can you guess how many of the four pairs of defenders allowed the slam to make?
Naturally, all four Wests led a spade. While I suppose you could make some sort of case for the club ace, it is just too likely to cost your side the second trick in that suit. All four Easts won their ace and knew that the most likely way to beat the slam was to collect a slow club trick or to cash an ace. If an ace was out, then a heart return now would only let through the contract if declarer had a doubleton ace-queen or ace-jack, along with a singleton club. So all four Easts played back a heart — contract made!