September 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 20th, 2017
|
I don’t play bridge, however, I enjoy reading the quotes you use. I would enjoy reading them as a collection. How do you accumulate them and do you have a favorite?
Rueful Rick, Trenton, N.J.
This is actually the most fun element of my work. I use dictionaries of quotations and the internet to prompt me for ideas, starting out with a keyword or concept. There are very few quotes that stay with me, but one by Matthew Arnold that I have never been able to forget is as follows: “We do not what we ought, what we ought not, we do, and lean upon the thought, that chance will bring us through.”
I assume you would use Stayman in response to an opening no-trump with ♠ J-9-4-2, ♥ A-Q-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-10. If the next hand overcalled in a major, would you try to play for penalty at equal vulnerability, or would you head to game – and if the latter, would you look to play the other major or settle for no-trump?
Jack-O-Lantern, Dallas, Texas
I’m sure I’d use Stayman in an uncontested auction, but I might double an overcall of two of a major for take out, then bid three no-trump even if my partner showed a major. That way I’m suggesting four in partner’s major and a stopper for no-trump. Then my partner can decide whether he wants to play the suit or no-trump.
As fourth player to speak, what is the best treatment for low level doubles in competition where no side has identified a fit? For instance, imagine partner overcalls one heart over one diamond, and the next hand bids either two clubs or one no-trump, and you now double. What does that mean? Mercy Rule, Charlottesville, Va.
Both sequences fit under the convention called Snapdragon. In both cases when three suits have been mentioned around the table, a double shows that the fourth player has five+ cards or four very good cards in the fourth suit, along with values and tolerance for your partner. Where RHO rebids one no-trump, the best treatment (in theory) is to play the double as both unbid suits. But that does require specific agreement.
|
How do you evaluate the following hand, after hearing two hearts to your right, four hearts to your left, and a double from partner? You have: ♠ A-10, ♥ J-3, ♦ K-J-7-3-2, ♣ Q-9-5-3 and are playing pairs, with nobody vulnerable.
On the Cusp, Union City, Tenn.
Were the majors switched, I might pass and lead a spade, but as it is I’m inclined to assume I should remove partner’s take-out double and the obvious call is four no-trump. That suggests both minors, and lets partner pick where he wants to settle.
Do you play RONF (Raise Only Non-Force) in response to a weak two bid? If so, what do you play jumps to be, and are new suits forcing for one round or forcing to game?
Calling Cards, Willoughby, Ohio
If you play a new suit as forcing, then it makes reasonably good sense to play jumps to the three level as invitational (good strong suits in hands with a minimum opening bid strength). If you bid a new suit then rebid it, that would therefore be forcing, as would the call of a second suit. But reversion to partner’s suit or a rebid of two no-trump would be non-forcing.
|
September 2nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 19th, 2017
Only the actions of the just Smell sweet and blossom in their dust.
James Shirley
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ J 10 8 7 5 3
♣ 2 |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ Q 9
♦ 4
♣ K Q J 9 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 6
♥ K 7 6
♦ Q 9
♣ 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
3 ♣ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
Your first thoughts should be to try to reach no-trump from your partner’s hand, so cuebid two spades, which initially focuses on the danger suit. If your partner has a stopper, he will bid no-trump, if not he will make a natural rebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 3 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 1st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 18th, 2017
The first precept was never to accept a thing as true until I knew it as such without a single doubt.
Rene Descartes
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 6
♥ K J 6 3
♦ Q 10 9 5
♣ 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4 2
♥ 7 2
♦ K J 7 6 4 2
♣ J 10 2 |
♠ 10 8
♥ Q 10 8 4
♦ A 8 3
♣ K 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9 7 5 3
♥ A 9 5
♦ —
♣ A Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦6
Your partner has shown extra values with short clubs, typically a 4-3-5-1 hand. Your hand is now spectacularly good – too good for a jump to four diamonds. My choice would be to bid five diamonds. If a call of four clubs means (as it probably should) a perfect fitting hand with no wasted values in clubs, sometimes called a Bluhmer, try that instead.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6
♥ K J 6 3
♦ Q 10 9 5
♣ 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 31st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, August 17th, 2017
Our knowledge is a receding mirage in an expanding desert of ignorance.
Will Durant
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 7 3 2
♥ K 9 4
♦ A 8 7 3
♣ 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q J 6
♥ 5 2
♦ 9 5
♣ K J 9 3 |
♠ 10 4
♥ 8 7 6
♦ Q J 10 4 2
♣ 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 5
♥ A Q J 10 3
♦ K 6
♣ A Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
An easy one, I hope. Your partner’s two heart call suggests a limited hand in the range of 6-9 HCP, but game your way is still very much in the picture. Your spectacular intermediates mean you are well worth an invitational call of two no-trump, to let your partner decide where to go from here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5
♥ A Q J 10 3
♦ K 6
♣ A Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 30th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, August 16th, 2017
There is no such thing as applied sciences, only applications of science.
Louis Pasteur
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 6 3
♥ 10 7 2
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5 4 2
♥ J 6
♦ K J 4
♣ K Q 10 4 |
♠ —
♥ Q 9 8 5 3
♦ 10 3
♣ A J 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 9 7
♥ A K 4
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ * |
Dbl. |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*second negative.
♣K
Partner’s double is just real extras; so it feels right to bid, not pass. In this sequence a call of four no-trump would be for take-out not natural or Blackwood. But it would normally suggest greater suitability for diamonds than this. I would therefore guess to bid five clubs, but in this sort of auction it may be more important to be lucky than good.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ Q 9 8 5 3
♦ 10 3
♣ A J 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 29th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 15th, 2017
Those who dream by day are cognizant of many things which escape those who dream only by night.
lan Poe
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 4 2
♥ 6 5 2
♦ 9 5 4
♣ 7 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6
♥ 7 3
♦ J 8 7 6 2
♣ 10 8 6 4 |
♠ Q J 9 8
♥ 9 8 4
♦ Q 10 3
♣ Q J 9 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5 3
♥ A K Q J 10
♦ A K
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*second negative
♦6
Although it is arguable that a call of two of a minor by your partner might be trying to improve the contract, a two heart bid shows real extras. He would pass with five hearts and no extras. You have just enough extras to bid, but your cards are so soft that maybe a raise to three hearts should suffice. Let partner try to get back to three no-trump if he wants to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 8
♥ 9 8 4
♦ Q 10 3
♣ Q J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 28th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, August 14th, 2017
I don’t want anyone to look to me, not for protection, not for happiness, not for love, not for anything.
P. D. James
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 10
♥ 10 9 6 2
♦ 5 4 2
♣ A 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ A K J 7 3
♦ K J 6
♣ Q J 9 6 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 8 5 4
♦ 10 9 8 7
♣ K 10 8 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 7 6 5 2
♥ Q
♦ A Q 3
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Since your partner can hardly have more than a five- or six- count and pass throughout, your chances of setting the game are limited. Are you going to lead diamonds and play partner for a card in that suit – when a low diamond might be best – or lead a club honor and hope to find partner with length there? I vote for a low diamond at pairs, the club jack at teams.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 4
♥ 7 3
♦ Q J 9 5 2
♣ K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
August 27th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 13th, 2017
|
At IMPs I dealt myself ♠ A-3-2, ♥ A-5-3, ♦ 8-6-4-3, ♣ A-4-2, a hand with nine losers and no intermediates. I passed, and the deal was thrown in. At the other table, the opponents opened and played their four-four diamond fit for +90. Any comments?
Better Business, Muncie, Ind.
I’ve not grown rich by passing 12 counts but if I did pass one it would be because it had too few aces, not too many. In judging whether to open the bidding, naming a suit you actually hold is better than bidding a three-card suit. But when you open a weak suit, partner often leads the wrong thing. I might even pretend I didn’t have four diamonds and might open one club. In my opinion, passing is more of a view than opening, but ♠ K-J-2, ♥ A-4-2, ♦ J-6-4-3, ♣ K-5-4 is a hand I might pass.
I understand Jeff Meckstroth has just been elected to the Hall of Fame. This makes me wonder who might be on your list of candidates who should be considered for the hall but have not made it yet.
Flim-Flam Man, Lakeland, Fla.
All my Aces contemporaries who wish to be considered are already in there (the one exception preferring not to be put forward). I feel that women are underrepresented; if what counts is being preeminent in your own field, then in alphabetical order: Lynn Deas, Jill Myers, and Judi Radin all have a place.
I need help on actions by passed hands. Holding ♠ Q-5, ♥ K-Q-8-5, ♦ 9-6-4-2, ♣ J-3-2, my RHO opened one diamond. I passed, and I heard a one heart response to my left. My partner overcalled one spade, and RHO doubled, to show three hearts. Am I strong enough to redouble – or does that send a specific message here?
Rissoles, Evanston, Ill.
A redouble is not conventional. It suggests ownership of the hand (say 10+) typically without support, and asks partner to join in as appropriate – either by bidding a second suit or doubling the opponents. Change your diamond two to the king and you might redouble, though I think I would actually just bid one no-trump. So I would pass for the time being.
|
You recently discussed what a jump to three no-trump in response to an opener should be played as. I agree it must be natural in response to a minor, but what about playing the jump to three no-trump, facing a one spade opening, as an unspecified mini-splinter? While over one heart, three no-trump is a real splinter in spades, and three spades the unspecified mini-splinter?
Inspector Gadget, Grand Junction, Colo.
Thank you! I thought this option might be too complex for my readers, but since you raised it, I agree that it makes sense to split your splinters into regular (12-14 or so) and keeping one call for the (9-11) mini-splinter, letting partner relay to find out where your shortage is if he wants to do so. Interested readers can follow up at: http://andrew-gumperz.blogspot.ca/2011/12/splinter-bids-and-some-bidding-theory.html?q=mini-splinter
Would you comment on how to respond to one spade holding ♠ J-8-2, ♥ A-5-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-9-4? If you would make a limit raise, would your opinion change if the opponents overcalled two of a minor?
Raised Eyebrows, Jackson, Miss.
I would never treat this hand as anything but a constructive raise to two spades in an uncontested auction, and feel even more strongly about that, should the opponents overcall. For the record, make the club four the diamond 10, to give me a potential ruffing value, and I might reconsider…give me the spade 10 as well instead of the two and you’d sell me on the more aggressive action.
|
August 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 12th, 2017
Things have their due measure; there are ultimately fixed limits, beyond which, or short of which, something must be wrong.
Horace
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 4
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ K 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 7 3
♥ J 6
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ Q 6 |
♠ 10 9 6 2
♥ 5 4
♦ 5
♣ J 9 8 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 8 5
♥ A 10 9 7 2
♦ K J 6 2
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
Your partner has warned you not to bid on, suggesting some defense to spades. Yes, you have five hearts, but your defense is more than adequate, so you should pass – and lead a trump of course. On all these auctions, declarer’s best chance of scrambling tricks normally comes from a cross-ruff.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ A 10 9 7 2
♦ K J 6 2
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♠ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 11th, 2017
Henceforth I ask not for good fortune, I myself am good fortune.
Walt Whitman
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8
♥ Q J 9 5 4
♦ A 9 5 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 3 2
♥ A 6
♦ J 8
♣ A J 7 5 4 |
♠ K J 10 7 4
♥ 7
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ Q 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6
♥ K 10 8 3 2
♦ K 10 2
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
If you doubled one spade it would show a penalty double of one heart, but a far more suitable hand for defense. Imagine the same hand with queen-third of spades and a doubleton diamond ace. Your choice appears to be between a pessimistic pass, a raise to two clubs, or an imaginative bid of one no-trump without a stopper. Even a bid of two hearts is possible I suppose. I’ll settle for two clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ Q J 9 5 4
♦ A 9 5 3
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal six spades would have been an excellent contract had North held the spade 10, so that South could maneuver a club ruff without risk, or if the opponents had not bid clubs, so that the chance of an over-ruff in clubs was not almost guaranteed.
At the table South won the club lead and gave up on trying to ruff a club, since even if West had only two spades and South drew two rounds before giving up a club, East could play a third spade himself; and if West had the outstanding trump this line would lead to immediate defeat.
Instead declarer drew all the trumps at once, and was pleased to see East following three times. That marked him with 10 black cards and made it almost a sure thing that West would have sole control of the red suits.
Next South cashed the diamond queen, king and ace, throwing a club from his hand. Then came the key move of leading the losing club to East, to rectify the count.
East took the trick and exited in hearts. South won the heart king, cashed the two remaining top spades, and in the process reduced the hand to a two-card ending. As the last trump was led, dummy had the doubleton heart ace and a diamond, and West was forced to discard his diamond winner or come down to only one heart. When he opted for the latter, South pitched the diamond from dummy and scored trick 13 with the heart seven.