September 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 12th, 2017
And the gates of it shall not be shut at all by day: for there shall be no night there.
Revelations, New Testament
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K
♥ Q J 10 9 5 3
♦ 6 3
♣ K 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 5 3 2
♥ 4
♦ 8 7 5 4 2
♣ J 9 |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ 7 6 2
♦ J 10 9
♣ A Q 10 7 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ A K 8
♦ A K Q
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦8
Without the double, you would have responded one spade, of course, in an attempt to improve the contract. But when the opponents double, it is less certain that it is your hand, and there is clearly less reason to bid, since West is about to take you off the hook. I would pass now, both to slow partner down if he has a good hand and in the hope of getting a chance to back in later, if appropriate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5 3 2
♥ 4
♦ 8 7 5 4 2
♣ J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 11th, 2017
No-one gets an iron-clad guarantee of success. Certainly, factors like opportunity, luck and timing are important. But the backbone of success is usually found in old-fashioned, basic concepts like hard work, determination, good planning and perseverance.
Mia Hamm
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 3 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ A K J 5 3
♣ 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6 4
♥ 7 6 3
♦ 10 8
♣ A 9 8 7 |
♠ K J 9 8 7
♥ 5
♦ Q 9 7 2
♣ Q J 10 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ A K J 10 9 4
♦ 6 4
♣ K 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
Your partner took no part in the auction so he surely does not have a decent red suit and values. If he did, he would have bid. Maybe the best chance to beat the game is to lead a club and hope declarer has only three? At pairs this hand is even harder, since a club lead is quite likely to cost a trick. I might lead the heart seven and hope to hit my partner’s length.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 4 2
♥ 7 2
♦ J 9
♣ K 10 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
September 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 10th, 2017
|
I was in fourth seat with: ♠ K-4-3, ♥ 8-2, ♦ 10-7-4, ♣ K-Q-6-3-2. I heard a weak two hearts on my left, doubled by my partner. I saw no reason to bid more than three clubs, and played there, missing a decent, and making, game in no-trump when my partner had 16 points with all four aces. What should I have done?
An Unsuitable Boy, Provo, Utah
If two no-trump was available as natural, I might have risked that call. The modern expert solution to this problem is to give up a natural two no-trump call, and to use it as a transfer to three clubs (to show a weak hand in clubs or diamonds) while a direct call of three of a minor promises values – a call you would only just be worth. This is an extension of a popular convention called Lebensohl.
I thought I had a difficult call in a team game holding ♠ J-2, ♥ Q-J-9-4, ♦ A-K, ♣ K-10-6-3-2, after hearing a one diamond opening bid to my right. I could not sensibly overcall in either of my suits, could I? And bidding one no-trump seemed out of range and flawed for many other reasons.
Frozen Solid, Portland, Ore.
I agree that the one no-trump call seems wrong, but I suppose you could persuade me otherwise were the spade jack the queen. Then, if doubled, I would probably run to two clubs. As it is, I will pass and hope to get the chance to double spades for take-out at my second turn. If forced to bid, maybe an overcall of one heart might not be the worst bid in the world.
If using fourth suit forcing, do you recommend any differences in the specific case of fourth-suit forcing at the one level after one club – one diamond – one heart? Might this be treated as other than forcing to game? In that case two spades would be game forcing but not necessarily spades.
Seeking Symbiosis, Texarkana, Texas
This is the way that I have been playing fourth suit forcing for many years. The only suggestion I would offer is that in this sequence the one spade call is only forcing for one round, and when followed by minimum action is invitational; but jumps create a game force. Equally responder’s direct jump to two spades specifically denies as many as four spades.
|
I am dipping my toe into the waters of playing 2/1 game forcing. Where do you stand on playing responder’s bid of one no-trump facing a major-suit opener: forcing, semiforcing or non-forcing?
Baby Steps, Bristol, Va.
I prefer that responder never bids one no-trump with more than a dead minimum opener — say a balanced 13 HCP and no five-card suit. That allows opener to pass with a balanced and dead minimum hand. With as much as 14 HCP, he should introduce a three-card minor. If you play Flannery (so opener never has the problem of what to do with a minimum hand with 4-5 in the majors) you get the best of almost every world.
You said you would elaborate on showing minors in response to a two no-trump opener. I’m holding your feet to the fire, if I may for your idea of the best methods out there.
The Waiting Game, Worcester, Mass.
One possibility is to play three spades as Minor-suit Stayman (now over three no-trump, denying a minor, opener shows a five-card minor with the majors being shortness and 5-5 pattern). This requires you to use Stayman with a one-suiter in a minor. An alternative is to use three spades as a puppet to three no-trump, after which one-suited minors bid the other minor. Calls of four hearts and four spades show the 5-4 minor hands, four no-trump show five-five minors.
|
September 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 9th, 2017
They sought it with thimbles, they sought it with care, They pursued it with forks and hope.
Lewis Carroll
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 3
♥ Q 6 3 2
♦ K Q 6 5
♣ J 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 7 5
♥ 9 8 5
♦ 10 8 3
♣ K 5 |
♠ 10 8 6 4 2
♥ —
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ 10 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A K J 10 7 4
♦ J 4
♣ A Q 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
You may have a weak hand, but that doesn’t mean you have to roll over without a fight. Since your partner rates to be relatively short in spades, you might take a surprising number of tricks in clubs, especially if he has a five-card suit, while the opponents can also come close to making a partscore. So bid three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 4 2
♥ —
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ 10 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
2 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 22nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 8th, 2017
I’m a dealer in magic and spells, In blessings and curses And ever-filled purses, In prophecies, witches, and knells.
W. S. Gilbert
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 8 4 3
♦ K 5 4
♣ 7 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 3
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 10 7 3
♣ Q 10 9 6 |
♠ J 9 7 4 2
♥ 7
♦ A J 9 8 6 2
♣ J |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ A K J 10 9 6
♦ —
♣ A K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
You can go low and pass, or you can respond either one no-trump, or two clubs. I prefer the last of these options for two reasons. The first is that a call of one no-trump potentially wrong-sides that strain, and is an overstatement of your values. Second, the opponents rate to have a major-suit fit and raising clubs makes it harder for them to find.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 10 7 3
♣ Q 10 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 7th, 2017
Be not angry that you cannot make others as you wish them to be, since you cannot make yourself as you wish to be.
Thomas a Kempis
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 10
♥ 3
♦ K Q 10 4 2
♣ A Q 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 3 2
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ 7 6
♣ J 9 7 |
♠ 6 5
♥ K Q 10 8 4
♦ A 8 5
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ J 9 3
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
You might make a responsive double, converting a three heart response to three spades (suggesting a better hand than bidding three spades directly). The problem with that action is that if partner instead bids three spades over your double, you won’t know what to do. I think nonetheless that double is right, planning to pass a three spade response and relying on partner to do more if he has extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ J 9 3
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 6th, 2017
Most roads lead men homewards, My road leads me forth.
John Masefield
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K J 9
♥ A J 5
♦ A K 4
♣ 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ 9 7 6 3 2
♦ Q 10 7 5
♣ K 10 8 |
♠ 10 8 6 4 3
♥ Q 8 4
♦ 2
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ K 10
♦ J 9 8 6 3
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥7
Do you see my megaphone? I am about to speak very loudly and clearly. Never overcall at the two-level in direct seat on a suit like this. A take-out double may lead to your missing a 5-3 diamond fit but that is hardly the end of the world. Conversely, overcalling here may get you into all kinds of trouble. I would pass a one spade opener, by the way, considering there to be no serious second choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 2
♥ K 10
♦ J 9 8 6 3
♣ A Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 5th, 2017
Human speech is like a cracked kettle on which we tap rhythms for bears to dance to.
Gustave Flaubert
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 7 5 4
♥ 6 4 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 9
♥ 10
♦ 10 5 3 2
♣ Q J 10 9 7 |
♠ K 8 3 2
♥ 8 7 5
♦ K J 8 7
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A K Q J 9 3
♦ A 9
♣ A 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
You have a stark choice here. Pass the two no-trump opening bid or transfer into spades, after which you can pass, or offer a choice of games with a call of three no-trump. I prefer to start with a transfer, but I would plan to pass the completion of the transfer. This doesn’t have to be right, however since partner can always break the transfer with a super fit, I’ll settle for partscore if he doesn’t.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7 5 4
♥ 6 4 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 4th, 2017
In formal logic, a contradiction is the signal of defeat, but in the evolution of real knowledge it marks the first step in progress toward a victory.
Alfred North Whitehead
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 4 3
♥ K 4 2
♦ Q 7 5
♣ Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 8
♦ J 10 6 4 2
♣ J 10 9 4 |
♠ 9
♥ A J 9 7 6 5
♦ A 9 3
♣ 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 7 2
♥ Q 10 3
♦ K 8
♣ A K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
Partner has scattered values but has not joined in, so we can assume no heart fit. Is that enough reason to lead a different suit? I think so. The spade sequence is just enough reason to lead that suit, particularly because your RHO might well have bid spades if he had the right hand with a three-card suit. So I would lead the spade jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8
♥ A J 7 4 3
♦ K 5
♣ J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 3rd, 2017
|
My partner has proposed we play Rosenkranz doubles to distinguish between hands on which advancer (overcaller’s partner) can raise his partner’s suit without a top honor, but can show a raise with a top honor by a double – or possibly a redouble. Where do you stand here?
Red Cross, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
I prefer to utilize the double to show a strong defensive hand rather than for a fit. These doubles are traditionally only used by fourth hand facing an overcall, and I can see the logic in using them in the way you describe if by a passed hand – but I would not advocate them in any other sequences.
Holding ♠ A-J-7-4-2, ♥ K-9-7, ♦ A-Q-9-7, ♣ 10, I opened one spade and heard my LHO overcall two clubs. My partner passed, but I felt he had broken tempo slightly before acting. When this came back to me what are my responsibilities in terms of passing bidding or doubling? For the record, my partner had a six-count with the shape for a negative double but only a singleton spade; so we could make three in either red suit.
At the Table, White Plains, N.Y.
You were very ethical to consider this a problem. Many people would process the break subconsciously but not admit to it. Here, if you have what you consider a clear action (one to which there is no logical alternative) take it. In my opinion, doubling for take-out is that clear… change the diamond seven to the club seven and some would pass, so you may feel obliged to do so. I’d never bid two diamonds as opposed to doubling, by the way.
When opener hears his partner make a negative double, is a jump in a new suit forcing or invitational? If partner had responded, that jump would have been game forcing, right?
Raising the Roof, Raleigh, N.C.
When your partner asks you to bid a suit with a negative double, all minimum actions show that suit but deny extra values. A jump to the three-level simply says that you have the appropriate suit(s) and extra values, while jumping to two of a major after opening a minor and hearing a negative double of a red suit promises no more than the equivalent of raising a major shown by partner. With forcing hands, start with a cuebid or a more extravagant leap than a simple jump.
|
Could you please elaborate on a complete structure over an opening bid of two no-trump? I’m assuming Stayman, and transfers to the majors at the three- and four-level.
Patterning Out, Madison, Wis.
A raise to three no-trump is to play, of course, with regular Stayman, transfers and Texas transfers to the majors. You can play a jump to four spades and four no-trump both as quantitative, the former suggesting both minors 4-4. Next week, I’ll answer the question as to how to show one or both minors. But with a four-card major and a longer minor start with Stayman, then either agree the major if appropriate, or bid the minor if not.
How would you evaluate this hand, playing at Board-a-Match teams? My partner held ♠ A-10-4-3, ♥ 10-8-2, ♦ 9-7-4, ♣ K-9-2 and responded one spade to one club. The next hand overcalled two diamonds, and I jumped to three spades. What would you do now? (My partner passed, but I had a 4-4-1-4 15-count with the king-queen of spades and the top hearts. Game needed only a mildly favorable lie of the clubs to come home.)
Swing Low, Holland, Mich.
My calculation is that after spades broke you might well have needed either hearts or clubs to behave well to come to 10 tricks – consider the effect of repeated diamond leads to see that. As far as I can see, both players did exactly the right thing; you were well short of a drive to game, your partner took account of the fact that in competition you may have had to shade your jump raise.
|
|
When partner opens a strong no-trump, North should drive to game in hearts. Many partnerships use Texas Transfers, so that they can transfer at the four level to play, or to use Blackwood, or even in some case to show voids by bidding a new suit. Meanwhile, the two-level transfer lets you subsequently jump to game as a mild slam try, with a jump to four no-trump in this sequence being natural and quantitative.
Against four hearts a spade lead would give the defenders the upper hand, but West has no reason not to lead a diamond. South still has his work cut out for him though, even after this start. Take a minute to form a plan.
It looks natural to dispose of dummy’s losing spade, but declarer still has to make sure he holds his club losers to three. If he leads clubs, the opponents will return trumps at every turn. This will prevent South from ruffing a club in dummy, and he will lose all four clubs.
The solution is to set up dummy’s spades, since this can be done in such a way as to shut West out. So at trick four, declarer runs the spade jack to East, pitching a club from dummy. He wins the heart return in hand, and advances the spade 10 to pitch another club. When it holds, he tries the spade nine, and West covers. So South ruffs high in dummy, and now draws trump ending in hand to discard another club on the spade eight. He can then lead to the club king to try for the overtrick.