June 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, June 12th, 2017
In life as in a football game, the principle is: Hit the line hard.
Theodore Roosevelt
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 4
♥ A J 8
♦ K J 2
♣ A Q 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 8 7 6 3 2
♥ 7 4
♦ A
♣ K 9 4 |
♠ Q
♥ Q 10 9 6 5 2
♦ Q 8 4 3
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K J 5
♥ K 3
♦ 10 9 7 6 5
♣ 10 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
Your partner’s double calls for a diamond lead. It sounds like he has four or more decent diamonds and a possible entry on the side. Your choice is whether to lead the low diamond or the jack. Since you appear to have two possible entries on the side I would lead the low diamond, just in case declarer has a singleton honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 2
♥ Q 10 2
♦ J 6 4
♣ J 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
June 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, June 11th, 2017
|
My partner has criticized me in the past for leading away from a king. Do you have any cast iron rules on what combinations you should or shouldn’t lead from?
First Footer, Raleigh, N.C.
Never ever listen to anyone who advises you about not leading from certain honors. Leading or underleading unsupported aces against suits is very dangerous — but I have run deals where I thought it right. Meanwhile, leading from kings is right as often as it is wrong. I’d say beware of it ONLY when leading into a very strong hand. Simplest is to listen to the bidding and lead what feels right. The question of when to be passive and aggressive is such a hard one that no simple piece of advice will be a panacea.
My regular partnership mostly plays pairs scoring, and some Board-a-Match scoring. It seems to me that part-score hands outnumber games and slams. If so, maybe competing accurately for partscores should be our top priority. Would it therefore make sense to build our system and agreements around a weak no-trump? Would that require major alterations to the rest of our framework?
Entry-Level, Jackson, Tenn.
I’m not convinced the weak no-trump would have a significant improvement in your ability to get in first. You lose some accuracy for the benefit of pushing the opponents to the two level. Having said that, the structural changes you need to make to the rest of your system would not be dramatic. Bear in mind you will be playing different methods to the field, though.
I recently held: ♠ K-Q-10-4, ♥ Q-7, ♦ —, ♣ A-Q-10-7-5-4-2 and opened one club. When my LHO overcalled one diamond my partner bid one heart, the next hand bid two diamonds, and I tried two spades, planning a rebid in clubs. I am still waiting…my partner passed, with three trumps to the jack and the club king plus the heart ace, so five clubs was cold, while two spades was a struggle. Who goofed?
Stop-gap, Penzance, England
With your distribution, it would be hard to believe the auction could end so abruptly. Had you bid anything else, you would have run a different kind of risk, one of not finding the best possible trump suit. Yes, maybe your partner should have played you for real extras in shape or high cards and gone back to three clubs.
|
Can you tell me why five-card majors are more in vogue than four-card majors? And under what circumstances would you introduce a four-card major as opener in first or second seat?
Litterbug, Augusta, Maine
Those who scoff at five-card majors tend to regard them as a security blanket. When you have one, it gives you a warm feeling, and your auction becomes more defined. Conversely opening a minor without length is bad for constructive bidding. Bidding four-card majors first may be ugly, but it lets you get your blow in first. I tend to open one in first or second seat with four only with a very good suit in a balanced minimum opener, planning to rebid at no-trump or pass a one no-trump response.
We missed our best spot yesterday and are trying to decide who underbid more. Opener held ♠ J-6, ♥ A-K-J-7-5-3, ♦ A-K-J-7-3, ♣ —, and after opening one heart and hearing a response of one spade, contented himself with two diamonds. Responder had a 4-2-3-4 shape with the spade ace, diamond queen and club jack, plus the doubleton heart 10, and passed. How do you evaluate what happened?
Petrified Forest, Wausau, Wis.
A more logical auction is for opener to jump in diamonds, then rebid the second suit over false preference to hearts. If responder bids four hearts, the auction will be over, if he cuebids four spades you should reach the diamond slam. This looks to be a good spot; it requires hearts 3-2 or a singleton heart queen.
|
June 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, June 10th, 2017
Government and co-operation are in all things the laws of life; anarchy and competition the laws of death.
John Ruskin
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 3 2
♥ A K J 9 7
♦ 8 4
♣ K 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 10 8 6
♦ K J 3
♣ A Q J 10 8 5 4 |
♠ J 8 7 6 4
♥ 4 2
♦ 10 9 5
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 9 5
♥ Q 5 3
♦ A Q 7 6 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣A
You do not have to drive to three no-trump singlehandedly; take a slower route by doubling two clubs, a call that is primarily for take-out. Over partner’s response you can bid three no-trump if necessary. As usual, though, it is better to follow a flexible route and to ask partner what he has rather than telling him.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 3 2
♥ A K J 9 7
♦ 8 4
♣ K 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, June 9th, 2017
Everybody knows if you are too careful you are so occupied in being careful that you are sure to stumble over something.
Gertrude Stein
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 6 3
♥ K J 7
♦ A 8 6 5
♣ Q 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 8 5
♥ 5 2
♦ K Q J 10 2
♣ 2 |
♠ 10 7 4 2
♥ 10 8 4
♦ 7 4
♣ K 8 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A Q 9 6 3
♦ 9 3
♣ A J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*limit or better in hearts
♦K
Although you have a great hand, you cannot really drive to game, since you need to find partner with a trick to be able to make game. If you jump to three hearts, partner should be able to work out that he needs little more than a king to bid on to game. Even a simple raise to two hearts here is a real game try, by the way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K
♥ A Q 9 6 3
♦ 9 3
♣ A J 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, June 8th, 2017
Always leave them laughing when you say goodbye.
George M. Cohan
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 3
♥ K 8 4
♦ A 9 8 5 4
♣ K 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 7 4 2
♥ Q 10 6
♦ Q J 10 2
♣ 9 |
♠ J 9 6
♥ J 9 7
♦ 6
♣ Q J 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 5
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ K 7 3
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
You should ask your opponent about the double – but the normal meaning for it is that West has a solid major. Your partner should redouble with a stopper in both majors, so there is something to be said for being cautious and retreating to four diamonds. If you have fallen victim to a con-trick, you will at least know never to trust that opponent again.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 3
♥ K 8 4
♦ A 9 8 5 4
♣ K 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 21st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, June 7th, 2017
Moral choices do not depend on personal preference and private decision but on right reason and, I would add, divine order.
Cardinal Basil Hume
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A Q 6 2
♣ A Q J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ A K 9 6 3
♦ J 10 9 7
♣ 8 7 3 |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 8 5 3
♣ K 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 7 6 3
♥ Q J 10
♦ K 4
♣ 10 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ * |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Checkback
♥K
Regardless of whether East intends his call to show a strong hand with diamonds, or the unbid suits, you are in a position to tell him he may have made a mistake. Redouble, announcing your side has the balance of high cards, and hope partner can raise you or take further appropriate action when the opponents bid on.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 7 6 3
♥ Q J 10
♦ K 4
♣ 10 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 20th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, June 6th, 2017
Do not consult anyone’s opinions but your own.
Samuel Pepys
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q J 10 2
♥ 8 6
♦ 7 5 4
♣ Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6
♥ Q 9 7 5 2
♦ 9 3
♣ 10 9 8 4 |
♠ 8 5
♥ K 10 4 3
♦ K Q J 10 8
♣ A 7 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4 3
♥ A J
♦ A 6 2
♣ K J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*spades
♦9
Two schools of thought exist here. Those playing ‘Equal Level Conversion’ say bidding two diamonds over two clubs does not show extras. The second group says it promises a king more than an opening bid, so you must pass two clubs here. I don’t have a dog in this particular fight but I would bid two diamonds now, believing that a suit this good needs to get bid – even at the cost of a slight overbid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ K 10 4 3
♦ K Q J 10 8
♣ A 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, June 5th, 2017
How much easier it is to be critical than correct.
Benjamin Disraeli
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 2
♥ J 10 4 3 2
♦ Q 5
♣ 10 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 3
♥ 9 5
♦ J 9 4 3
♣ K 7 3 |
♠ K 6 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ 10 8 7
♣ Q 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A K
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A J 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*hearts
♠10
The principle of leading fourth highest against no-trump is ingrained in us all. On blind auctions, though, one should only take a good thing so far. Yes, lead from five-card suits, and sequences when you can. But when in doubt, as here, do not lead away from ace-fourth into a strong hand; there are so many ways that this will rate to cost a trick. Lead the spade two instead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 3 2
♥ K 9 5
♦ A 10 5 4
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, June 5th, 2017
How much easier it is to be critical than correct.
Benjamin Disraeli
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 2
♥ J 10 4 3 2
♦ Q 5
♣ 10 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 3
♥ 9 5
♦ J 9 4 3
♣ K 7 3 |
♠ K 6 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ 10 8 7
♣ Q 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A K
♦ A K 6 2
♣ A J 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*hearts
♠10
The principle of leading fourth highest against no-trump is ingrained in us all. On blind auctions, though, one should only take a good thing so far. Yes, lead from five-card suits, and sequences when you can. But when in doubt, as here, do not lead away from ace-fourth into a strong hand; there are so many ways that this will rate to cost a trick. Lead the spade two instead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 3 2
♥ K 9 5
♦ A 10 5 4
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, June 4th, 2017
|
Holding ♠ K-10-2, ♥ Q-7-5-2, ♦ K-9-2, ♣ A-4-2. I heard my partner open two no-trumps and was unsure as to whether to drive to slam or invite it, and which route to follow. I had the option of using Stayman and following up with four no-trump or something else if I found a heart fit. Or I could just have bid four no-trump directly as a quantitative action. What would you recommend?
Shooting Star, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
Sometimes the two no-trump opening blocks your side from finding a fit. I’d treat this hand as worth no more than an invitation to slam unless we find hearts, so my plan would be to use Stayman and then set hearts as trump if we find a fit, or follow up with four no-trump as a quantitative invitation, if we do not.
With ♠ A, ♥ K-J-4-3 ♦ A-Q-5-4-3, ♣ Q-6-5, would you open a strong no-trump, now that the ACBL has approved such actions? If you don’t, and choose to open one diamond, what would you rebid over partner’s expected one spade response?
Be Prepared, Troy, N.Y.
My roundabout answer is that with hands of this generic shape and appropriate spade holding, plus 15 HCP I tend to open one diamond and downgrade the hand into a one no-trump rebid. With 17, I will reverse or jump to two no-trump, depending on what I consider more appropriate (I will try not to conceal a major at my second turn). With 16 I may feel obligated to open one no-trump, but I might hate myself in the morning.
In a recent ‘Bid with the Aces’ problem you advocated rebidding a spade suit of K-Q-J-10-2 after partner opens one diamond and rebids two clubs. I have no quarrel with treating that spade suit as a six-bagger, but I thought that responder taking any second bid here except for a preference back to opener’s first suit would show an invitational hand. Does it suggest a hand in the 9-to-11 range or not?
Value for Money, Riverside, Calif.
If we play strong-jump responses, let us contrast responder’s rebid in an auction where opener has rebid his suit and one where he had introduced a new suit. In the former case, responder’s rebid is deemed to be constructive, because he would normally pass when weak, knowing he was facing a six-card suit. You cannot draw that inference about the auction you quote. Two spades now might either be an attempt to improve the contract or mildly constructive.
|
I picked up ♠ A-Q-J-6-5-2, ♥ Q, ♦ K-J-3-2, ♣ A-4. How much would you bid on opening one spade in second seat, and hearing a two spade (Michaels Cuebid) call to your left, with partner passing and RHO bidding three hearts? Would your call be affected by the vulnerability?
Standing Pat, Edmonton, Alberta
Your hand is too offensive to pass here, but jumping to four spades would be too much, even at favorable vulnerability. So a bid of three spades seems right. For the record, doubling for take-out would not be absurd were your heart queen the ace.
After opening one club with: ♠ J-10-8-2, ♥ A-8-3, ♦ Q-J-4, ♣ K-Q-4, you recently suggested a rebid of one no-trump over a response of one heart. Can you comment on why a rebid of one spade or a raise to two hearts might not work?
Second Chance Sal, Taos, N.M.
Raising hearts with three in a balanced hand feels wrong. Equally, the disadvantage in rebidding one no-trump is that you might lose spades when partner is weak with both majors. That said, if partner has invitational values or better he should be able to find spades — and will know your exact shape if he does. Also, a one spade response (which I play as guaranteeing real clubs) might get you to clubs – could you blame a partner with 2-4-3-4 pattern for thinking there was a club fit?
|
|
This week’s deals all come from the European Championships of 2016, held in Budapest, in the scenic setting of a football stadium. The crowds were somewhat smaller than might have been the case at a soccer game, but one cannot have everything.
Host nation Hungary were on Vugraph on day one, and were somewhat fortunate to escape with a small pick-up here instead of a large loss, when in one room Rumania bought the contract in two spades by West, down a trick.
Meanwhile, in the other room after the auction shown here, where North’s second double simply showed extras with no clear call, the Rumanian South took a flyer at three no-trump, and bought a very suitable lie of the cards for his choice. Gabor Winkler led a low spade, and declarer won in hand and played a diamond, won by West’s ace.
South took the third round of spades in hand, and led a diamond to the king, followed by the diamond jack …and East, who had started life with queen-fourth of diamonds, thoughtfully ducked it. That was curtains for declarer, when the heart finesse was wrong, since he no longer had enough entries to hand to establish diamonds. Of course with the sight of all four hands we would all have unblocked the diamond jack under the ace at trick two, wouldn’t we?
(For the record, declarer could have recovered by taking the club finesse when in hand with the second spade, but his actual play made perfect sense; it just didn’t work.)