August 20th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 6th, 2017
|
You recently commented about the conditions to open one no-trump. This hand below came up in a local game this week. Playing five-card majors and strong no-trump, would you open one no-trump with: ♠ A-J, ♥ A-Q-10-9, ♦ A-4, ♣ 9-6-5-4-3? Would opening a suit and rebidding one no-trump be a significant underbid?
Playing House, Torrance, Calif.
This hand looks like a balanced not an unbalanced hand, because the minor is so weak I don’t want to emphasize it. I am not strong enough to open one club and respond two hearts over one spade, so I would have to rebid one no-trump. I’d opt for that choice with ace-fifth of clubs and the doubleton spade jack, I think, but as it is I’ll open one no-trump.
Not vulnerable, my partner opened one diamond in first seat, followed by two passes and a one heart bid by my Left Hand Opponent. My partner passed, as did my Right Hand Opponent. I then bid two clubs; what should my partner expect of me?
Trying it On, Louisville, Ken.
A good question. I’d say I would expect 4-5 points and long clubs, no diamond fit, unsuitable for bidding a major or 1 NT the first time out. Since most of us WOULD bid one no-trump on any six-count or respond in a major if we had one, a single-suiter seems most likely.
I held ♠ J-10-2,♥ 10, ♦ Q-10-9-8-3, ♣ Q-10-9-8. My partner opened two clubs, followed by a rebid of two no-trump over my two diamond call. I chose to bid Stayman, and raised his three spades to four. It turned out he had ace-jack-third of hearts and because the club king was finessable, you could make 12 tricks in either contract. How would you have bid my hand?
Howdy Doody, Northridge, Calif.
When partner has a very strong hand and we only have regular Stayman available, I guess I’d just blast three no-trump. Let me add a suggestion. Even if you play regular Stayman, you can use a response of three no-trump to Stayman as five spades – what do you have to lose, since it has no other meaning in the standard scheme of responses?
|
We had a pre-game seminar at our club last week and this deal came up. With ♠ A-10-8, ♥ A-Q-J-9-2, ♦ Q-5, ♣ K-Q-10, what would be your plan facing a one club opener? (Partner’s opener is a dead minimum, but his hand includes five decent clubs plus the heart king and diamond ace; so 12 tricks are easy in three strains – though not 13.)
Flummoxed, Cartersville, Ga.
This is a hard hand – but it exemplifies why we play strong jumps shifts. After one club – two hearts – two no-trump – three no-trump responder has shown an 18-count with five hearts. If opener can find one further call (maybe four clubs or four hearts) you should achieve your target.
My partner introduced me to an odd-sounding concept, and I need help. Can you discuss what ‘Unusual against Unusual’ means and how it applies?
Old Sparky, New Canaan, Conn.
When the opponents show a specific two-suiter, (by bidding two no-trump over partner’s one heart, say) use the three club and three diamond cuebid to show two different hand types. One is a limit raise in hearts, one is a spade hand – typically one plays this as better than a direct three spade call, which would show a non-forcing hand. You can link clubs and hearts together, and diamonds to spades. Alternatively, you can make the higher cuebid – if it is below three of partner’s suit – as the limit raise. Whatever you do, make sure you agree it!
|
August 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 5th, 2017
Histories makes men wise; poets, witty; the mathematics subtle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric, able to contend.
Francis Bacon
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 3
♥ K 8 2
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ K 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 6 5
♥ Q 9 6 3
♦ —
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
♠ Q 9
♥ J 10 5 4
♦ J 9 6 4
♣ 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 4 2
♥ A 7
♦ A Q 8 7 3
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣10
With a weak hand and no fit for diamonds, the question is whether to try to improve the contract or settle for a possibly inferior contract in order to stay low. If I could introduce a second suit economically, I might do so, but here passing two diamonds could be very ugly. I’ll risk rebidding two spades, and take the blame if I’m wrong.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 6 5
♥ Q 9 6 3
♦ —
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 4th, 2017
As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.
Josh Billings
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 7 5
♥ A J 9 8 7 5
♦ A K
♣ 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ 10 3
♦ 8 5 4
♣ K 10 5 4 |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ Q
♦ 10 9 6 3 2
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A J 10
♥ K 6 4 2
♦ Q J 7
♣ A J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*hearts
♥3
The redouble on this sequence suggests playing in two clubs redoubled. Even though you have great controls, are you prepared to play a 4-2 (or possibly 3-2) fit? Since your partner might have opened one club with four and a decent suit – given that we know his diamonds are clearly weak. I’d just bid two hearts, I think, which is natural and forcing after using fourth suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 5
♥ A J 9 8 7 5
♦ A K
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, August 3rd, 2017
Switzerland would make a mighty big place if it were ironed flat.
Mark Twain
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 2
♥ A K Q 10 9 3
♦ A
♣ Q 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 4
♥ 8 7 2
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 8 6 3 |
♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ 5 4
♦ K 10 7 6 5
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ J 6
♦ Q 9 4 2
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
This is a hand where slam might be laydown or 10 tricks might be the limit. You have too much to go quietly and settle for game, but start with a game-try of three diamonds (yes this is forcing) to see whether partner can co-operate. If not, settle for game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ J 6
♦ Q 9 4 2
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 16th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, August 2nd, 2017
Painters and poets alike have always had license to dare anything.
Horace
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 5
♥ A Q 9 8 6 3
♦ A 10 5 3
♣ 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 7 4 2
♥ 7
♦ K 7 4
♣ K J 6 |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ K
♦ 9 8 6 2
♣ 10 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ J 10 5 4 2
♦ Q J
♣ A Q 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥7
Even if you play one spade as encouraging but not forcing – reasonable enough, though I am happy to play new suits as forcing – you should not pass now. Best is to rebid two diamonds, which is a more complete description of your hand than rebidding your hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ A Q 9 8 6 3
♦ A 10 5 3
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 15th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017
O! What authority and show of truth Can cunning sin cover itself withal.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ Q 7
♦ 5 3 2
♣ A Q J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5
♥ J 9 6 3 2
♦ J 9 4
♣ 8 4 |
♠ Q 10 8 6 4
♥ 10 8 5
♦ A 8 7
♣ K 7 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A K 4
♦ K Q 10 6
♣ 10 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
Though your honors are strong, I would advocate responding two diamonds rather than three clubs here. The problem is that you have only a five- card suit, and you run the risk of pre-empting partner out of his natural sequence if you bid three clubs. You should be able to show your hand later (though club suits are problematic because three clubs often serves as a second negative).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 3 2
♥ Q 7
♦ 5 3 2
♣ A Q J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 14th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, July 31st, 2017
There lives more faith in honest doubt Believe me, than in half the creeds.
Lord Tennyson
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ 8 5 2
♦ K J 8
♣ A Q 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7
♥ A Q 9 7 3
♦ 10 4 2
♣ K J 5 |
♠ 9 6
♥ K 4
♦ 9 7 6 5
♣ 8 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 3 2
♥ J 10 6
♦ A Q 3
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦2
My last choice would be a diamond – the likelihood that I’m giving declarer a trick we won’t get back is too high. I can see a case for any of the other three suits; a heart is the most aggressive, but most likely to cost a trick, so I’d settle for the club sequence narrowly in front of the spade lead (the seven for choice).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5 2
♥ Q 8 4
♦ A Q 9 2
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 30th, 2017
|
I held: ♠ Q-J, ♥ A-10-7-5-4, ♦ A-Q-9-4, ♣ 10-8 and responded one heart to my partner’s one club opener. After a one spade overcall I balanced with two diamonds, and heard two spades to my left, passed back to me. Do you like a call of two no-trump now, my choice? This was not a success, losing the first six spade tricks. Double was the winning call, since careful defense beats that contract one trick.
RuPaul, U.C. Davis, Calif.
Without sounding unduly negative, it is important to understand that your two diamond call fundamentally misrepresented your hand. That call is natural but non-forcing; it might easily be 4-5 in the reds. Almost any good hand starts with a cuebid, or in this case a double for take out. Now after two spades comes back to you, you can double again, planning to raise no-trump or bid three diamonds over three clubs. A second double is NOT penalty; just a good hand, with extras.
My partner opened one club and heard me respond one heart, over which she jumped to three hearts. I bid Keycard Blackwood and followed up with five no-trump over her five spade response, which showed two keycards and the trump queen. What should you do now with her hand, holding: ♠ 7-3, ♥ Q-5-4-3, ♦ A-5, ♣ A-K-Q-8-4?
Peter Peck, Grand Junction, Colo.
Despite holding a minimum you must bid seven hearts now. Your source of tricks should mean that partner will be able to develop the clubs to take care of his spade or diamond losers. With the same hand, but the spade queen not club queen, I would just bid six clubs, showing my specific king.
I held ♠ K-Q-9-8, ♥ Q, ♦ A-Q-4, ♣ A-7-5-4-2, and would be interested on hearing your opinion about whether to bid game, splinter, or bid three spades after opening one club and hearing partner respond one spade in an uncontested auction. Would it matter if partner were a passed hand? In response to a jump to three spades would you bid game with ace-fifth of spades and queen-third of clubs?
Zig-Zag Zelda, Boise, Idaho
Facing a passed hand I would just bid four spades and not worry about slam. I don’t think the hand is worth a splinter (whereas if the heart queen was the club queen you’d be full value for the jump to four hearts) whether partner is a passed hand or not. You could sell me on a four spade bid facing an unpassed hand, but it is close to a three-spade bid. And yes, partner should raise three spades to four, facing likely club length. He has two working honors and five trumps.
|
Can you tell me what is the best place to read bridge hands online? I’m interested not only in bridge columns but a general discussion of news and views.
Storm Chaser, Lakeland, Fla.
My column can be found at bridgeblogging.com, where it runs two weeks after it appears in the papers. But if you want news and views try bridgewinners.com, and to follow live bridge at the top level go to bridgebase.com.
I just played online with a partner who said Michaels was off with interference. If you define interference as the opponents being in the bidding, then surely you can’t have Michaels without interference?
Mikey Likes It, Danville, Ill.
To clarify when you can use a Michaels Cuebid: they apply in both second and (in some cases) in fourth seat. After the opponents open, a direct cuebid shows a two-suiter. After they open and respond in a new suit, it is customary in North America to play that bidding either opponent’s suit is natural. However, play Michaels after the opponents open one of a suit and respond one no-trump. If you pass and later bid an opponent’s suit, facing a passing partner, it is natural.
|
August 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, July 29th, 2017
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science.
Albert Einstein
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 4 3
♥ —
♦ K Q 10 2
♣ A 9 7 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ A J 10 8 3 2
♦ 8 7
♣ K J |
♠ 5
♥ K 5
♦ A J 6 5 3
♣ Q 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A K J 8 7 2
♥ Q 9 7 6 4
♦ 9 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ * |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Minors.
♦8
Anyone who only raises to three diamonds, go to the back of the class! This hand is far too strong for that action, and you have two ways to show the extras. One is to bid the impossible two spades (you have denied length there already) as a way to show a maximum raise for partner. The other is to jump to three spades, a splinter bid agreeing diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ K 5
♦ A J 6 5 3
♣ Q 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, July 28th, 2017
Surprise is the greatest gift which life can grant us.
Boris Pasternak
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A Q 7
♥ K Q J 7 6 4 2
♦ 10 5 3
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ 9
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ K Q J 10 2 |
♠ J 8 5
♥ A 10 5
♦ K 4
♣ 9 8 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 6 2
♥ 8 3
♦ Q J 7 2
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
4 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong heart preempt
♣K
You can make a simple and good case for redoubling, but the problem comes when opponents bid and raise hearts. How do you describe your hand now? Bidding spades would overstate the suit, but passing might lose it altogether. I’d settle for a simple one spade call, planning to double a heart bid (for take-out, since this is an agreed suit) if the opponents make one.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6 2
♥ 8 3
♦ Q J 7 2
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
It is logical for South to open two no-trump, showing 20-21, and for North to bid what he thinks his partner can make, by jumping to six no-trump. The 5-4 diamond fit never gets mentioned, but in fact no-trump plays just fine.
After the lead of the club 10 to the queen, declarer can almost count 12 winners, but he sees there may be one small catch. He can pick up a 4-0 diamond division on either side, provided he knows which defender has four diamonds. Is there a way to thwart a potentially malign fate here?
South can improve his chances by delaying the decision in diamonds as long as possible, specifically by ducking a spade at trick two. West plays low and declarer puts in dummy’s 10, letting East take the trick with his queen. After winning the club return, declarer cashes his black suit winners, and when East discards on the third spade he discovers that West started with five spades and three or four clubs.
This means that there is now a far smaller chance that West has four diamonds, than that East has the length in that suit. In all such situations, play the defender with the more vacant spaces (in his hand not his cranium) for length in a side suit.
Accordingly, declarer leads a diamond to the king. Then he can play the diamond 10, covered by the jack and queen. He can return to dummy with a high heart and take the second diamond finesse against East’s nine for his contract.