April 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 4th, 2017
The more original a discovery, the more obvious it seems afterwards.
Arthur Koestler
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9
♥ 8 6 4 3
♦ 9 8
♣ A K Q 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 8 7 3
♥ J 7
♦ Q 10 4 2
♣ 10 4 |
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 10 9 5
♦ K J
♣ J 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 4 2
♥ A Q 2
♦ A 7 6 5 3
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠7
A call of four clubs is forcing, showing five or more clubs and four hearts, asking your partner for cooperation in a possible slam. You don’t have quite enough to drive to slam, but by letting partner know what you have, you can try to engage his cooperation. Incidentally four no-trump by him at his next turn would be discouraging, not Blackwood.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9
♥ 8 6 4 3
♦ 9 8
♣ A K Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 3rd, 2017
Be not too tame neither, but let your own discretion be your tutor.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ J 10 7
♦ A K 8 4
♣ 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 6
♥ K 9 5
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ 3 2 |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ Q 8 6
♦ 3 2
♣ K Q J 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A K J
♥ A 4 3 2
♦ 7 6 5
♣ A 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦Q
When faced with the choice of leading in unbid suits from a sequence or a broken suit, I won’t say that it is no contest, but you need a good reason to eschew the sequence. I can’t think of one here, so I’d go with the club jack. If my LHO had opened one club rather than one diamond I’d guess to lead a diamond, I suppose.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ Q 8 4 3
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 16th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 2nd, 2017
|
With: ♠ A-Q-2, ♥ K-7, ♦ J-9-6, ♣ K-8-5-4-3 I opened one club, and heard a weak jump to two diamonds on my left. When my partner made a negative double, I was stuck for a call. My instincts were to bid two no-trump without a stopper, but I chickened out and rebid my clubs, which left us in an inferior part-score. Would you contemplate a bid of two spades on the three-card suit?
Tied up in Tinseltown, Los Angeles, Calif.
Introducing the three-card spade suit looks a reasonable shot (after all, you may need to ruff diamonds in your hand). Your first thought of bidding no-trump here was not a terrible idea, but I’m just too cowardly to want to explain this to partner if I’m wrong! I hate rebidding clubs with such a poor suit.
Would you be kind enough to clarify the meaning of the last call on the following unopposed sequence: when I open one spade and rebid two hearts over my partner’s two club call, he rebids two no-trump. Now at my third turn if I bid three diamonds, what would you expect that to show?
The Sign of the Four, Duluth, Minn.
When partner has already bid no-trump and the auction is below three no-trump, the primary meaning for a call in the fourth suit here is to suggest length not shortage. You suggest a 5-4-3-1 pattern with some interest in playing in a contract other than three no-trump, thus probably extra values. But if your partner had rebid three clubs, three diamonds would be the fourth suit, so initially a probe for no-trump, with maybe a half-stopper.
I just had a friendly (well not so friendly) discussion with the Tournament Director at my local club. As dummy I observed my RHO revoke on the second round of clubs. When he followed to the third club I pointed this out to my partner, and was told in no uncertain terms that this was inappropriate. Can you explain the correct etiquette for dummy?
Punctilious Petra, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
I’ve been caught out here too. There are two contrasting instructions: say nothing as dummy until an irregularity has been confirmed or the end of the hand is reached. BUT if an irregularity has been established and the director is not called, dummy should rectify that omission at once.
|
I held: ♠ 3, ♥ A-J-9-4, ♦ A-K-10-8-2, ♣ Q-9-4. When I opened one diamond, I heard my partner respond two clubs, game-forcing. Do you agree with my choice of two hearts? Next I heard my partner jump to three no-trump. Can you tell me what my partner showed, and what I should do next?
Bonus Baby, Monterey, Calif.
Yes, your two heart call (suggesting this red-suit pattern) looks right to me. Some might play your partner’s jump to game as Fast Arrival. Not me: I believe it shows extras, with two no-trump suggesting less or more than a strong no-trump. That makes the decision to move on now with a natural slam try of four clubs a straightforward one. You can always stop in four no-trump.
Our two-club opening is forcing to game or four of a minor, except when opener’s rebid is a passable call of two no-trump. Recently as responder I held something like: ♠ 2, ♥ 9-6-4, ♦ J-5-3, ♣ K-J-10-7-4-3. Rightly or wrongly, I judged it not quite enough for a constructive three-club response, so bid two diamonds. Playing cheaper minor as a “second negative” is there any way I can unambiguously show the six-card club suit at my next turn?
Minor Minus, Nassau, Bahamas
If you don’t play two diamonds as a positive and a direct two hearts as a second negative, then another possibility is to co-opt a direct two no-trump bid to show this hand. In other words, it describes semi-positive values with long clubs, since that hand is so awkward to describe in any other way. I agree a direct three club call should be a better hand and suit than this.
|
April 15th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 1st, 2017
There is no sauce in the world like hunger.
Cervantes
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 3
♥ A 8 7 6
♦ A Q 10 5 2
♣ Q 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 2
♥ K Q 5 3 2
♦ J 6
♣ K 7 3 |
♠ 9 7 4
♥ J 10
♦ K 8 7
♣ A J 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 8 6
♥ 9 4
♦ 9 4 3
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
This is a take-out double, and you have no reason to play for penalties just because of your singleton spade. I would bid two hearts, and await developments from here on in. If your partner doesn’t have four hearts, he will surely have enough extras to be able to describe his hand properly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ A 8 7 6
♦ A Q 10 5 2
♣ Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 14th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 31st, 2017
The person who goes farthest is generally the one who is willing to do and dare. The sure-thing boat never gets far from shore.
Dale Carnegie
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 7 4 2
♥ Q 10
♦ A 8 6
♣ J 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 6 3
♥ 5 3
♦ Q 10 3
♣ Q 7 4 |
♠ Q J 9 5
♥ 8 7 4 2
♦ J 4
♣ K 9 8 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K J 9 6
♦ K 9 7 5 2
♣ A 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♠ |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
Your partner’s three heart call suggests length there, so your hand should fit your partner well. Your ace in the side suit is bound to be useful, and your fourth trump and useful doubleton in hearts should be enough to jump to four spades. You may have a minimum in high cards, but not all minimums are created equal.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 4 2
♥ Q 10
♦ A 8 6
♣ J 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, March 30th, 2017
All argument is against it, but all belief is for it.
Samuel Johnson
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K Q 10 4
♦ A K 4 2
♣ K 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 4
♥ 8 3
♦ Q J 9 6
♣ J 7 3 |
♠ 10 9 8 5 3
♥ 9 6
♦ 5
♣ Q 10 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A J 7 5 2
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ A 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ ** |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*hearts, game forcing
**short spades
♠K
To bid on in this uncontested auction would be to make a constructive try for game. To put it another way, switch your majors and you might just be worth a two spade call. As it is, with three small spades pass, and hope to make it. A one no-trump call by you would show 18-20; more than a direct one no-trump overcall.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K Q 10 4
♦ A K 4 2
♣ K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, March 29th, 2017
Oft expectation fails, and most oft there When most it promises.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ K J 6
♦ A K 7 2
♣ 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 4
♥ A 7 3
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ 10 8 4 |
♠ 10 6 3 2
♥ 5 4 2
♦ 6 5 3
♣ J 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A K J
♥ Q 10 9 8
♦ Q 4
♣ A K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 NT* |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*pick-a-minor
♦J
You limited your hand at your first turn after which partner showed a strong hand with hearts. In context you are very suitable for slam, so let your partner in on the secret with a cuebid of four diamonds. The fact that your RHO opened the bidding should not worry you; he was in third seat after all. Your partner knows your range, so if he just wanted to find the best game he can sign off now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 5
♥ K J 6
♦ A K 7 2
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 28th, 2017
(When asked why numbers are beautiful). It’s like asking why is Ludwig van Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony beautiful. If you don’t see why, someone can’t tell you. I know numbers are beautiful. If they aren’t beautiful, nothing is.
Paul Erdos
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 8 7
♥ A 8 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5 4
♥ K Q J 10 4
♦ 8
♣ K J 9 3 |
♠ 2
♥ 9 7 6 2
♦ Q J 9 7 6
♣ 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 6 3
♥ 5
♦ K 4 3
♣ A Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
It is far from clear where you should be going on this hand. But to start with, redouble to show your partner that you believe it is your side’s hand. You might make this call with rather less (take away the spade king for example) so you plan to follow up with an invitational sequence such as a jump to three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 7
♥ A 8 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 27th, 2017
I never resist temptation, because I have found things that are bad for me do not tempt me.
George Bernard Shaw
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 7 6
♥ Q J 7 2
♦ Q 7 6
♣ J 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 4
♥ 8 3
♦ 8 5 4 3 2
♣ 10 4 |
♠ K 8 5
♥ K 6 5 4
♦ 10 9
♣ K Q 8 5 |
| South |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ A 10 9
♦ A K J
♣ A 9 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
Dummy is surely going to put down a ruffing value either in spades or clubs – and you know your trumps won’t play a role on defense. I’d guess to lead trump to kill as many ruffs as I can, rather than do declarer’s work for him. Leading partner’s suit is all well and good, but you are also allowed to think for yourself.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 2
♥ Q J 9 5
♦ 9 6 3
♣ K Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
All pass |
|
April 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 26th, 2017
|
What criteria should I apply after opening a strong no-trump to make a “super accept” of my partner’s transfer bid? Our current agreement is that with four trumps opener should jump to the three level, irrespective of his HCP, if not completely balanced. Is that a sound approach, particularly for Pairs? And would you recommend anything more detailed than this?
Having a Fit, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Maybe you can also use a two no-trump response as specifically a maximum with three good trumps, headed by two of the top three honors? Scientists will also assign meanings to new suits here, but I’m not sure that is a good investment of brain cells.
With: ♠ Q-2, ♥ K-9-6-5-3, ♦ A-8-5, ♣ K-10-4 I opened one heart and heard my partner respond two diamonds. Where do you rank the raise of diamonds, the rebid of hearts, or a two no-trump call?
Seconds Out, Tupelo, Miss.
The flawed options are to raise diamonds, which should deliver a fourth trump or extra high-cards, to rebid two no-trump without a proper spade stopper, or to rebid hearts. I prefer to play that as showing either a sixth trump or a respectable five-carder. Unless you can rebid your major with no guarantee as to suit quality, the least lie is surely to opt for the two no-trump rebid. This tells most of your story and may even right-side no-trump.
When the opponents overcall against our strong no-trump, what combination do you recommend of penalty doubles or take-out doubles by opener and responder?
Red-Card Robby, Milford, Pa.
After an overcall of two clubs (unless it specifically shows the majors) use double as Stayman, with transfers still in place. A double of any other artificial call —where the opponent’s bid does not show the suit bid — should be penalty oriented. The double of any natural call from either side of the table should be take-out, if it is the first action taken by the partnership after the no-trump opener. Subsequent doubles, or doubles after Stayman or a transfer, generally suggest defending.
|
I wonder if you could comment on the merits of the sandwich no-trump? Do you believe in fourth seat when sandwiched between bidding opponents, that you should play the call of one no-trump as natural or two-suited?
John Montague, Ketchikan, Alaska
By a passed hand, use the one no-trump call as 5-5 in the unbid suits, while double suggests 10-11, probably 5-4 pattern. An unpassed hand needs the call as natural and a decent strong no-trump. These days as openings and responses get lighter, your side may be able to make slam in the face of both opponents bidding — so you must be able to bid your good hands accurately. And when you can double or jump to an unusual two no-trump, you don’t need a third call for the unbid suits.
My partner and I were discussing the philosophy of competing, and this hand caused us fits. With ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2, in fourth chair after LHO opened one diamond and RHO bid one heart, would you double? Assuming you pass, what if LHO raises hearts, or even if he repeats diamonds, and the auction comes back to you?
Keeper of the Clink, Torrance, Calif.
I would not act on the first round, even though I have opening values. I need a little more shape or high cards than this. On the second round I would double whichever red suit my LHO had bid. There is no guarantee of safety, but I hate to be shut out.
|
|
In today’s deal, facing a one diamond opener, North sensibly decided to drive his hand to game, thus responded two clubs. If his side wanted to play hearts it rated to play better from his partner’s side, and the fit could still come to light later. If you respond one heart you can never really describe your assets properly after that.
Now switch to declarer’s seat in three no-trump on a spade lead. After the spade queen holds at trick one, you have seven fast tricks. Where will you find two more? The right thing to do is to try the heart finesse first. When the heart queen holds, you might change tack from your original plan of playing clubs from the top.
The heart finesse is a discovery play, to determine the goal from the club suit, (in other words whether to play for 3-3 clubs or to protect against 4-2 clubs). By taking the heart finesse, you learn how to play clubs. When the finesse wins, you can afford to duck a round of clubs as your safest route to four tricks in the suit, given that dummy is entryless outside the clubs. If the heart finesse had failed, you would have relied on a 3-3 club split.
Incidentally if the hearts in dummy had been 10-9-6-3 you might have led a heart to the queen, then cashed the ace before tackling clubs, since if either the king or jack fell under the ace, you would have had a guaranteed route to nine tricks by setting up a third heart winner for your side.