May 1st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 17th, 2017
For when the One Great Scorer comes, To write against your name He marks – not that you won or lost – But how you played the game.
Grantland Rice
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9
♥ A K 10 9 8 2
♦ 6
♣ A J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 6
♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ A K 10 4 2
♣ K |
♠ 8 4
♥ Q
♦ J 9 8 7 3
♣ 8 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 5 3 2
♥ J 5
♦ Q 5
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
Few of us are sufficiently gifted with psychic talent to think we might guess the killing lead here. Since all four suits could be right, let’s play the percentages and find the lead that combines a reasonable degree of safety with being as likely as anything to hit partner. For me, that is the diamond jack, which may avoid costing a trick when it is wrong.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ J 10 8
♣ K 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
April 30th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 16th, 2017
|
I’m unclear as to the best matchpoint strategy about inviting game facing a no-trump opener. I think I understand that it is right to have full values to invite when balanced – but what about with a shapely hand? Recently after transferring to spades with ♠ A-6-5-4-2, ♥ 10-3 ♦ K-10-9-3-2, ♣ 2, I decided it was best to pass when my partner did not break the transfer. The best game for us was five diamonds when my partner had a doubleton spade king, but even the spade game came home today.
Patrick Thistle, Schaumburg, Ill.
My general approach here is to transfer to spades and bid two no-trump with balanced hands, but to make a light invitation with five spades in an unbalanced hand via Stayman then two spades over a red suit. That might not help here, I admit but at least I can differentiate my invitations.
I know you are not an especial fan of Bergen Raises, but if playing semi-forcing no-trump would you consider using a direct jump to three clubs as an invitational three-card spade raise? A three diamond call could be four trump, or some other kind of invitational hand.
Thoroughly Modern Mindy, Elmira, N.Y.
For me simplest is best. I don’t mind playing forcing or semi-forcing no-trump, and even if using the latter I can put balanced invitations with three trump through this response. If I end up in one no-trump facing a minimum balanced hand, it might be our last (or best) plus score. Three level jumps are thus natural and invitational.
You recently suggested that a reader might raise his partner’s opening one spade bid to three no-trump as a good raise to four spades. Might not opener pass expecting a balanced hand without spade support?
Jimbo in Limbo, Kenosha, Wis.
I was suggesting using the three no-trump call as purely artificial, not a suggestion of a place to play. It can be used to show a spade raise with less than the minimum for a Jacoby two no-trump response, but still with enough shape to want to play game. Shading the Jacoby response can lead to problems when opener tries for slam expecting more values opposite. The three no-trump call can either be used as a shapely raise to game or, if you prefer, as a splinter in an unspecified suit instead. If the latter, partner can relay to find out if interested.
|
When bidding in sandwich seat I’m often confused about whether to overcall, double or bid one no-trump if I hold a strong hand. Recently with ♠ K-9-2, ♥ A-J, ♦ A-J-9-6-4, ♣ K-10-3 I was not even sure if I should come into my opponents’ auction at all, after hearing one club on my left, and one heart to my right. What would you bid?
Duke of Earl, Charlottesville, Va.
I would bid here, but the choice between overcalling, doubling, and bidding one no-trump is indeed a close one. Your high-cards make it relatively safe to double, a little less safe to bid one no-trump or two diamonds, since you can more easily get doubled for penalty. I suppose my extra values make it right to double now.
Are there any major contributions to bidding theory in the last 20 years – or has everything that could be found out about the game already been published?
Novelty Hunter, Grand Forks, N.D.
The modern tendency at expert level to use transfer responses to a natural but potentially short club is undeniably interesting. I’m also particularly taken with the idea that the call of two no-trump can be used in competition as either a raise or a purely competitive call (to distinguish it from invitational hands). See http://webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group3/gberns/world/new%20bridge%20site/myweb4/Articles/Competitive%20Bidding/Good%20Bad%202NT.pdf
|
April 29th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 15th, 2017
Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.
New Testament
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6 5
♥ 7 4 3
♦ A K J 6 2
♣ Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ A K 10 2
♦ 8 5
♣ K 7 6 |
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 6
♦ 9 7 3
♣ 10 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 7 3
♥ Q 5
♦ Q 10 4
♣ A 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Your honors may not be pulling their full weight, but there is no reason to assume that West must hold both the missing club honors. Start by cuebidding two clubs, and even if your partner signs off, you will be worth at least one further try for game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5
♥ 7 4 3
♦ A K J 6 2
♣ Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 28th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 14th, 2017
Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
Friedrich Hegel
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 6 5
♥ A 8 5
♦ J 5 4 2
♣ A 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 3
♥ J 6 4
♦ K 10 9 7 6
♣ 9 7 2 |
♠ Q 10 7 4 2
♥ Q 10 2
♦ 8 3
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 9
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ A Q
♣ K Q J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠8
There is no need to jump to game; you cannot be sure that four spades (or three no-trump) is the right place to play. Equally, slam might be cold. All of this suggests that the right way to develop this hand is to cuebid two diamonds, planning to bid two spades over two hearts, which will be natural and forcing. The cuebid by an unpassed hand is forcing to suit agreement.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 6 5
♥ A 8 5
♦ J 5 4 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 27th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, April 13th, 2017
And trust me not at all or all in all.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 8 6 5 4
♥ 8 7 3
♦ A
♣ K Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q
♥ J 5 2
♦ Q 8 4 2
♣ 10 8 3 |
♠ 7 2
♥ A
♦ J 10 7 5 3
♣ J 9 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 3
♥ K Q 10 9 6 4
♦ K 9 6
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
I’m not sure a simple raise to three clubs will suffice here. Your partner came into a live auction, in a situation where you had implicitly denied values. He is likely to be 5-5 or have real extra values, and you should jump to four clubs to give your partner a chance to bid game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 2
♥ A
♦ J 10 7 5 3
♣ J 9 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 26th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, April 12th, 2017
What is this life if, full of care, We have no time to stand and stare?
W. H. Davies
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 5 2
♥ 9 6 4
♦ 8 4 2
♣ A K 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 7 6
♥ 3
♦ A 9 6 3
♣ J 10 8 |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 8 7 5
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ Q 9 3 |
| South |
♠ J 3
♥ A K Q J 10 2
♦ K 5
♣ 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
These days the majority of pairs play direct jumps by responder at his second turn as invitational. After this start, really strong hands will use new minor (here a call of two clubs as a Stayman equivalent) to set up a force. That being so, a jump to three diamonds should be this sort of hand: a shapely invitation interested in game in diamonds or spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 7 6
♥ 3
♦ A 9 6 3
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 11th, 2017
While all deception requires secrecy, all secrecy is not meant to deceive.
Sissela Bok
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ Q J 5
♦ 6 5 3
♣ A K 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 5 4
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K J 8
♣ 8 5 |
♠ 8 7 2
♥ 10 2
♦ 10 9
♣ Q J 9 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J 3
♥ A K 8 6 3
♦ A Q 7 4 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
As 14-counts go, your hand could hardly be any better; indeed I could not imagine stopping out of game. The real concern might be that you would miss slam here, since the right 10-count opposite could make 12 tricks a formality. A jump by you to five clubs should be a splinter, setting diamonds as trump, and letting partner evaluate his assets as best he can.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 3
♥ A K 8 6 3
♦ A Q 7 4 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 10th, 2017
He has gained every point who has mixed practicality with pleasure, by delighting the reader at the same time as instructing him.
Horace
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 6
♥ 7
♦ K 8 4 3
♣ A Q 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 7
♥ J 9 8 6 5 4
♦ 10 2
♣ 10 8 |
♠ 10 9 8 5 4
♥ 10 3
♦ J 9 7 6
♣ 9 4 |
| South |
♠ 3 2
♥ A K Q 2
♦ A Q 5
♣ K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| 7 NT |
Dbl. |
All Pass |
|
♠K
My guess would be to lead my second highest club, because with such a bad suit I want my partner to be alive to the idea that he might need to shift to a second suit in order to beat the opponents. If I had two sure entries on the side, I might lead fourth highest here.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3 2
♥ 10 4
♦ A J 6
♣ 9 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
April 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 9th, 2017
|
Can you tell me how to respond to a weak jump response to my opener? Recently I had seven good diamonds (missing the king) and ace-queen third of spades, with a doubleton king and a singleton on the side. My partner responded two spades to my one diamond opener. Would a jump to four spades be sensible, or should I look for slam?
Looking Up, Rockford, Ill.
If you play the two spade call to be natural and weak with a range of 3-6 points or so (one should not normally do it with more) a jump to game looks simple and direct. You will surely not make slam here — partner cannot have an ace on the side and relatively bad trumps, such as six to the king, as he would respond one spade then rebid the suit with that hand. This pre-emptive jump rarely has a trick on defense outside the suit, so even game may prove a struggle.
A bidding sequence that produced a huge disagreement at my club saw our partnership start unopposed: one diamond – one spade – one no-trump – three clubs. In the post mortem my partner said it was a club control, typically shortage. I had a bare minimum, 2-4-4-3 hand and took it as natural, showing game-going values, but my partner had 11 HCP.
Agree to Disagree, Pittsburgh, Pa.
If you play New Minor Forcing with a call of two clubs artificial here, then some play three clubs as invitational, some forcing, and some a sign-off! But I think everyone would play it as natural and at least five cards. I suggest you use it for invitational values, with forcing hands starting with two clubs. A jump to four clubs might be a self-agreeing splinter for spades – but you did not ask me that…
We do not play two over one, though maybe we should if the deal described below is anything to go by. My partner opened one heart, and with ♠ 7-2, ♥ J-9-2, ♦ K-4, ♣ A-Q-10-8-5-2, I responded two clubs. Then I supported to two hearts at my second turn over my partner’s rebid of two diamonds. We played there, making ten tricks when my partner passed with a 2-5-4-2 hand – he had the top hearts and the diamond ace, and clubs behaved. How should we get to game here?
Underwhelmed, Indianapolis, Ind.
If you play your bid of two hearts as non-forcing, showing 9-11 points with 2-3 card trump support, then you bid precisely what you have. Partner is allowed to pass with a minimum opener – which is exactly what he had. By the way, if you play this style then you should, I think, play a jump in hearts as forcing, not invitational, and bid fourth suit without a fit. The advantages of two over one are that you don’t need to have this sort of discussion.
|
I’m very distressed to read about the accusations of high-level cheating in international events, and also of various top players cutting corners in national events, many of which have been covered on bridgewinners. com. Are these sorts of incidents widespread, and are there more or less of them now than there were?
Alarm Clock, San Antonio, Texas
First the good news: screens and live camera coverage mean casual cheating is less likely now than before. Also players are far more aware of their ethical obligations now than they used to be. We won’t ever stamp out collusion but we have the capacity to investigate it if the will is sufficient. Alas, that’s the rub. I don’t believe the powers-that-be are sufficiently determined in this area, yet.
In one of your recent columns, South had ♠ A-K-4-2, ♥ Q-J-8, ♦ A, ♣ A-K-J-9-8 and opened two clubs. South seems to be rather lacking in quick tricks, to me. Also, as you described it, the bidding South rebid three clubs over the waiting two diamonds, then over his partner’s call of three diamonds he bid three spades – and got lucky when he found a fit. Would you prefer a rebid of three no-trump at the third turn, notwithstanding the actual 4-4 spade fit?
Going Low, Spartanburg, S.C.
I tend to open one of a minor with two-suited hands and a long minor, since that keeps the auction low. I would do that here. On the actual auction, over the three-diamond rebid (typically a second negative) I’m fine with three spades, even if it might lead to three no-trump played from the wrong side.
|
April 22nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 8th, 2017
We never do anything well till we cease to think about the manner of doing it.
William Hazlitt
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 5 4 2
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 10 6 3
♣ 8 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 6 3
♥ J 10 7
♦ K 2
♣ K 9 3 |
♠ K
♥ Q 8 5 4
♦ A J 9 7 4
♣ 10 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7
♥ A K 3
♦ Q 8 5
♣ A Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
You will probably feel torn here between raising diamonds and making a negative double, to get hearts into the picture. In a way, four hearts is almost as likely to be the best game for your side as five diamonds, with three no-trump an outsider. My guess would be to double, planning to bid diamonds at my next turn at the three or four level if the opponents compete.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J
♥ Q 8 5 4
♦ A J 9 7 4
♣ 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
All the deals this week come from the Cavendish tournament, where a series of Invitation Pair games were played annually in Las Vegas from the mid-nineties through till just a couple of years ago. The event has now moved to Monaco.
Today’s deal shows that sometimes the most innocent of deals produce swings. The late Guido Ferraro played the normal game of four hearts on a top diamond lead. That looks comfortable enough does it not, just looking at the North-South cards? Eddie Wold led a top diamond, then shifted to the club king. Ferraro won and took the spade finesse (wouldn’t you?)
Now Wold won and led a second top diamond, forcing Ferraro to ruff in dummy – or so he thought. But at this point declarer was stuck in dummy. He could only lead hearts or clubs, so now one defender could get a ruff in one suit and eventually give his partner a ruff in the other. Down one — and it’s hard to see that declarer did anything wrong. The alternative line of cashing the spades from the top might fail if trumps are four-one, so what else could declarer have done?
The strange thing is that if declarer had not ruffed the second diamond, he would have been in position to overtake dummy’s remaining trump and make 10 tricks.
As the original reporter noted in passing, declarer had nine winning discards from dummy and only one losing option. To reject your 90 percent winning odds is never a good idea at Las Vegas.