Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 17th, 2017

For when the One Great Scorer comes,
To write against your name
He marks – not that you won or lost –
But how you played the game.

Grantland Rice


S North
E-W ♠ J 9
 A K 10 9 8 2
 6
♣ A J 10 9
West East
♠ Q 7 6
 7 6 4 3
 A K 10 4 2
♣ K
♠ 8 4
 Q
 J 9 8 7 3
♣ 8 7 5 3 2
South
♠ A K 10 5 3 2
 J 5
 Q 5
♣ Q 6 4
South West North East
1 ♠ 2 2 3
3 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ All pass
       

K

All the deals this week come from the Cavendish tournament, where a series of Invitation Pair games were played annually in Las Vegas from the mid-nineties through till just a couple of years ago. The event has now moved to Monaco.

Today’s deal shows that sometimes the most innocent of deals produce swings. The late Guido Ferraro played the normal game of four hearts on a top diamond lead. That looks comfortable enough does it not, just looking at the North-South cards? Eddie Wold led a top diamond, then shifted to the club king. Ferraro won and took the spade finesse (wouldn’t you?)

Now Wold won and led a second top diamond, forcing Ferraro to ruff in dummy – or so he thought. But at this point declarer was stuck in dummy. He could only lead hearts or clubs, so now one defender could get a ruff in one suit and eventually give his partner a ruff in the other. Down one — and it’s hard to see that declarer did anything wrong. The alternative line of cashing the spades from the top might fail if trumps are four-one, so what else could declarer have done?

The strange thing is that if declarer had not ruffed the second diamond, he would have been in position to overtake dummy’s remaining trump and make 10 tricks.

As the original reporter noted in passing, declarer had nine winning discards from dummy and only one losing option. To reject your 90 percent winning odds is never a good idea at Las Vegas.


Few of us are sufficiently gifted with psychic talent to think we might guess the killing lead here. Since all four suits could be right, let’s play the percentages and find the lead that combines a reasonable degree of safety with being as likely as anything to hit partner. For me, that is the diamond jack, which may avoid costing a trick when it is wrong.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ J 6 5
 Q 9 2
 J 10 8
♣ K 8 3 2
South West North East
      1 NT
Pass 3 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 16th, 2017

I’m unclear as to the best matchpoint strategy about inviting game facing a no-trump opener. I think I understand that it is right to have full values to invite when balanced – but what about with a shapely hand? Recently after transferring to spades with ♠ A-6-5-4-2,  10-3  K-10-9-3-2, ♣ 2, I decided it was best to pass when my partner did not break the transfer. The best game for us was five diamonds when my partner had a doubleton spade king, but even the spade game came home today.

Patrick Thistle, Schaumburg, Ill.

My general approach here is to transfer to spades and bid two no-trump with balanced hands, but to make a light invitation with five spades in an unbalanced hand via Stayman then two spades over a red suit. That might not help here, I admit but at least I can differentiate my invitations.

I know you are not an especial fan of Bergen Raises, but if playing semi-forcing no-trump would you consider using a direct jump to three clubs as an invitational three-card spade raise? A three diamond call could be four trump, or some other kind of invitational hand.

Thoroughly Modern Mindy, Elmira, N.Y.

For me simplest is best. I don’t mind playing forcing or semi-forcing no-trump, and even if using the latter I can put balanced invitations with three trump through this response. If I end up in one no-trump facing a minimum balanced hand, it might be our last (or best) plus score. Three level jumps are thus natural and invitational.

You recently suggested that a reader might raise his partner’s opening one spade bid to three no-trump as a good raise to four spades. Might not opener pass expecting a balanced hand without spade support?

Jimbo in Limbo, Kenosha, Wis.

I was suggesting using the three no-trump call as purely artificial, not a suggestion of a place to play. It can be used to show a spade raise with less than the minimum for a Jacoby two no-trump response, but still with enough shape to want to play game. Shading the Jacoby response can lead to problems when opener tries for slam expecting more values opposite. The three no-trump call can either be used as a shapely raise to game or, if you prefer, as a splinter in an unspecified suit instead. If the latter, partner can relay to find out if interested.

When bidding in sandwich seat I’m often confused about whether to overcall, double or bid one no-trump if I hold a strong hand. Recently with ♠ K-9-2,  A-J,  A-J-9-6-4, ♣ K-10-3 I was not even sure if I should come into my opponents’ auction at all, after hearing one club on my left, and one heart to my right. What would you bid?

Duke of Earl, Charlottesville, Va.

I would bid here, but the choice between overcalling, doubling, and bidding one no-trump is indeed a close one. Your high-cards make it relatively safe to double, a little less safe to bid one no-trump or two diamonds, since you can more easily get doubled for penalty. I suppose my extra values make it right to double now.

Are there any major contributions to bidding theory in the last 20 years – or has everything that could be found out about the game already been published?

Novelty Hunter, Grand Forks, N.D.

The modern tendency at expert level to use transfer responses to a natural but potentially short club is undeniably interesting. I’m also particularly taken with the idea that the call of two no-trump can be used in competition as either a raise or a purely competitive call (to distinguish it from invitational hands). See http://webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group3/gberns/world/new%20bridge%20site/myweb4/Articles/Competitive%20Bidding/Good%20Bad%202NT.pdf


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 15th, 2017

Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.

New Testament


S North
Both ♠ K 6 5
 7 4 3
 A K J 6 2
♣ Q J
West East
♠ J 9 8 4
 A K 10 2
 8 5
♣ K 7 6
♠ 2
 J 9 8 6
 9 7 3
♣ 10 9 4 3 2
South
♠ A Q 10 7 3
 Q 5
 Q 10 4
♣ A 8 5
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 Pass
2 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ All pass
       

K

At pairs overtricks and undertricks are your bread and butter, but at teams and rubber they tend to fall by the wayside.

In today’s deal from the Dyspeptics Club, South sensibly chose to rebid two spades rather than two no-trump, though had his red suits been switched he might have gone the other way.

Against four spades West cashed his hearts then led a third heart, ruffed by declarer in hand. Declarer continued with the spade ace and a spade to the king, East showing out. South next set about diamonds, but West ruffed the third round and accurately returned his last trump. Stuck in his hand, declarer had to lose a club trick, and with it, and the contract

When South looked around for sympathy he was faced with North’s grim visage. Wisely perhaps, South did not tempt fate by looking for sympathy. Can you see why North was upset?

Declarer was playing for an overtrick by his handling of the trumps. If East had held the spade length, he could have picked up the suit without loss. But South should have focused on making 10 tricks and the way to do that is to cash the ace and queen of spades. If they split 3-2, draw the last trump then play on diamonds for two club discards.

But when as here, South run into length on his left, he leaves the spade king in dummy and start running diamonds. West will ruff the third round, but declarer will have the spade king as an entry to the winning diamonds.


Your honors may not be pulling their full weight, but there is no reason to assume that West must hold both the missing club honors. Start by cuebidding two clubs, and even if your partner signs off, you will be worth at least one further try for game.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 6 5
 7 4 3
 A K J 6 2
♣ Q J
South West North East
  1 ♣ 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 14th, 2017

Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.

Friedrich Hegel


S North
E-W ♠ A J 6 5
 A 8 5
 J 5 4 2
♣ A 6
West East
♠ 8 3
 J 6 4
 K 10 9 7 6
♣ 9 7 2
♠ Q 10 7 4 2
 Q 10 2
 8 3
♣ 10 5 3
South
♠ K 9
 K 9 7 3
 A Q
♣ K Q J 8 4
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
3 NT Pass 6 NT All pass
       

♠8

In today’s deal at his second turn, South can either reverse into hearts or simply jump to two no-trump. Either way, he will get to show his real extras, suitable for no-trump, by his third turn. Now North can jump to slam.

In six no-trump, on the opening lead of the spade eight, South needs to generate extra tricks from both diamonds or spades. It looks logical to play on diamonds first; if the finesse succeeds, South can then develop his 12th trick from spades.

So South wins the spade king, then club ace, and takes the diamond finesse. West wins his king and returns another spade through dummy’s tenace. Since the finesse looks a broken reed, South must put up the ace and play for a squeeze.

First he cashes the diamond ace, then runs his clubs, and at trick nine, West is obliged to save two diamonds, and must therefore reduce to two hearts. Dummy’s threat card in diamonds has served its purpose and must now be discarded, so that dummy can preserve the spade jack as a threat against East.

Declarer next crosses to dummy with the heart ace, and cashes the diamond jack, squeezing East. East cannot release a spade, since dummy’s jack would then become established. East therefore discards a heart, and South wins the last two tricks with the heart king and nine.

Did you see the defense to the slam? West must shift to a heart at trick four. This disrupts declarer’s communications for the squeeze.


There is no need to jump to game; you cannot be sure that four spades (or three no-trump) is the right place to play. Equally, slam might be cold. All of this suggests that the right way to develop this hand is to cuebid two diamonds, planning to bid two spades over two hearts, which will be natural and forcing. The cuebid by an unpassed hand is forcing to suit agreement.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 6 5
 A 8 5
 J 5 4 2
♣ A 6
South West North East
  1 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, April 13th, 2017

And trust me not at all or all in all.

Alfred, Lord Tennyson


S North
Both ♠ J 10 8 6 5 4
 8 7 3
 A
♣ K Q 6
West East
♠ A K Q
 J 5 2
 Q 8 4 2
♣ 10 8 3
♠ 7 2
 A
 J 10 7 5 3
♣ J 9 7 4 2
South
♠ 9 3
 K Q 10 9 6 4
 K 9 6
♣ A 5
South West North East
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 4 All pass
       

♠K

If a partner you can normally trust does something seemingly strange in defense, it is worthwhile to pause and ask yourself why.

When West led the spade king against four hearts, East followed with the seven and declarer with the nine. Now West knew East’s seven was either a singleton or top of a doubleton – the start of an echo. After the spade ace held the second trick, the full spade position was clear.

At the next trick came the play that put East under the microscope, when West continued with the spade queen, apparently setting up dummy’s suit.

East could count on three tricks for the defense – the two already in the bag, plus the ace of trumps. It was possible, if unlikely, that West held the club ace – if South had held all the missing heart honors plus good diamonds, he would likely have bid in just the same way. But East felt that West would then have cashed the club ace at trick three, since the risk of declarer discarding his clubs on the spades would have been evident.

The only other plausible scenario was that West held jack-third or queen doubleton in trumps. If that were so, East would need to utilize his trump ace right now. If he did not, declarer would cross to dummy and lead a heart, and East’s ace would beat empty air. So East ruffed his partner’s spade queen with the trump ace – and now West had a second trump winner to defeat the game.


I’m not sure a simple raise to three clubs will suffice here. Your partner came into a live auction, in a situation where you had implicitly denied values. He is likely to be 5-5 or have real extra values, and you should jump to four clubs to give your partner a chance to bid game.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 2
 A
 J 10 7 5 3
♣ J 9 7 4 2
South West North East
    1 Dbl.
Pass 1 ♠ 2 ♣ 2 ♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, April 12th, 2017

What is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare?

W. H. Davies


S North
Both ♠ A 5 2
 9 6 4
 8 4 2
♣ A K 6 5
West East
♠ K Q 10 7 6
 3
 A 9 6 3
♣ J 10 8
♠ 9 8 4
 8 7 5
 Q J 10 7
♣ Q 9 3
South
♠ J 3
 A K Q J 10 2
 K 5
♣ 7 4 2
South West North East
1 1 ♠ 2 ♣ Pass
3 Pass 4 All pass
       

♠K

In today’s deal North-South were playing two over one as game forcing. But in competition North’s two-club call did not guarantee a second bid. Hence South had to jump to three hearts to set up a force. Now North’s diamond holding persuaded him to try four hearts rather than try for three no-trump. As you can see, reaching no-trump from South might have been the perfect outcome at teams, but at pairs the prospect for a 10th trick at hearts made his decision reasonable.

Put yourself in declarer’s position when West led the spade king against four hearts. See if you can find a better chance than simply finding the diamond ace onside. At the table South ducked the opening lead, and East followed with the nine, playing reverse signals, thus suggesting a three-card suit.

West now decided that declarer was unlikely to have the club queen or he might well not have ducked the first trick, so he accurately shifted to the club jack. South took dummy’s ace, cashed the heart ace, then made the critical play of leading the spade jack, ducking in dummy when West covered.

The best West could do was win and play a second club. Declarer won dummy’s king, threw his third club on the spade ace, and ruffed a club high.

Now he could lead draw trumps ending in dummy, then cash the long club to pitch a diamond. At this point, he had 10 tricks without relying on a favorable diamond position.


These days the majority of pairs play direct jumps by responder at his second turn as invitational. After this start, really strong hands will use new minor (here a call of two clubs as a Stayman equivalent) to set up a force. That being so, a jump to three diamonds should be this sort of hand: a shapely invitation interested in game in diamonds or spades.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 10 7 6
 3
 A 9 6 3
♣ J 10 8
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 11th, 2017

While all deception requires secrecy, all secrecy is not meant to deceive.

Sissela Bok


S North
None ♠ Q 9 6
 Q J 5
 6 5 3
♣ A K 10 6
West East
♠ A K 10 5 4
 9 7 4
 K J 8
♣ 8 5
♠ 8 7 2
 10 2
 10 9
♣ Q J 9 7 4 3
South
♠ J 3
 A K 8 6 3
 A Q 7 4 2
♣ 2
South West North East
1 1 ♠ 2 ♠ Pass
4 All pass    

♠K

Last month I mentioned in passing that while attitude signals worked to give partner your opinion as to whether to continue with the suit led or whether to shift, there might still be occasions when you would encourage partner’s lead, even if you didn’t like the suit all that much.

The best reason for doing that is that you know you fear the consequences of partner’s shift, if you discourage his lead. Let us look at where we want to avoid partner making the “obvious” switch.

Playing a five-card major system, South opens one heart, West overcalls one spade, North bids two spades to show at least a limit raise in hearts and South bids four hearts.

When West leads a top spade, your systemic play would be the two, but do you really want partner to play a diamond, which is his most probable switch if you discourage spades? You are better off encouraging a spade continuation, (before the rats get at it) and allowing partner to collect his diamond winners if any in the fullness of time.

The point here is that even if partner were psychic enough to shift at trick two to a club not a diamond, declarer would then dispose of his second spade loser on the clubs and make his contract in a different way. From partner’s perspective, a diamond might be essential if declarer was about to build a discard on clubs and spades. His hand might be a 2=6=3-2 shape with the top hearts, diamond ace and club jack.


As 14-counts go, your hand could hardly be any better; indeed I could not imagine stopping out of game. The real concern might be that you would miss slam here, since the right 10-count opposite could make 12 tricks a formality. A jump by you to five clubs should be a splinter, setting diamonds as trump, and letting partner evaluate his assets as best he can.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 3
 A K 8 6 3
 A Q 7 4 2
♣ 2
South West North East
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 10th, 2017

He has gained every point who has mixed practicality with pleasure, by delighting the reader at the same time as instructing him.

Horace


N North
Both ♠ A J 6
 7
 K 8 4 3
♣ A Q 7 5 2
West East
♠ K Q 7
 J 9 8 6 5 4
 10 2
♣ 10 8
♠ 10 9 8 5 4
 10 3
 J 9 7 6
♣ 9 4
South
♠ 3 2
 A K Q 2
 A Q 5
♣ K J 6 3
South West North East
    1 Pass
3 ♣ Pass 5 ♣ Pass
5 Pass 5 ♠ Pass
7 Dbl. Pass Pass
7 NT Dbl. All Pass  

♠K

At a Fort Worth sectional, one of my readers, Dick McLamore was South. When he produced a strong jump shift to North’s one-heart opener(!) he heard North jump to five clubs, suggesting good clubs. So he took a pot at the grand slam, once he found a spade control opposite.

When West doubled, North masochistically passed, but McLamore decided that the double had to be based on a club void, the so-called Lightner double. This asks the hand on lead either to attack dummy’s first-bid suit, or to give his partner a ruff. Accordingly he escaped to seven no-trump.

This was logical reasoning, but wrong in every respect. Admittedly, the complete deal would have come as a complete surprise to just about everybody except North, who had had a bidding box accident at her first turn.

Against seven no-trump McLamore captured the spade king lead with the ace. If diamonds were 3-3, he could see there would be 13 tricks for the taking, but West showed out on the third round. Can you see how to advance the play?

Declarer simply ran the clubs, throwing a spade from hand on the fifth. He already knew from the bidding and play thus far that West had the spade queen and the hearts guarded, but even if East had held four hearts as well as West, the last club would have successfully squeezed both players.

In that scenario only a heart lead would have broken up the squeeze, and anyone who found that would have my admiration.


My guess would be to lead my second highest club, because with such a bad suit I want my partner to be alive to the idea that he might need to shift to a second suit in order to beat the opponents. If I had two sure entries on the side, I might lead fourth highest here.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 3 2
 10 4
 A J 6
♣ 9 7 6 4 3
South West North East
      1 NT
Pass 3 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 9th, 2017

Can you tell me how to respond to a weak jump response to my opener? Recently I had seven good diamonds (missing the king) and ace-queen third of spades, with a doubleton king and a singleton on the side. My partner responded two spades to my one diamond opener. Would a jump to four spades be sensible, or should I look for slam?

Looking Up, Rockford, Ill.

If you play the two spade call to be natural and weak with a range of 3-6 points or so (one should not normally do it with more) a jump to game looks simple and direct. You will surely not make slam here — partner cannot have an ace on the side and relatively bad trumps, such as six to the king, as he would respond one spade then rebid the suit with that hand. This pre-emptive jump rarely has a trick on defense outside the suit, so even game may prove a struggle.

A bidding sequence that produced a huge disagreement at my club saw our partnership start unopposed: one diamond – one spade – one no-trump – three clubs. In the post mortem my partner said it was a club control, typically shortage. I had a bare minimum, 2-4-4-3 hand and took it as natural, showing game-going values, but my partner had 11 HCP.

Agree to Disagree, Pittsburgh, Pa.

If you play New Minor Forcing with a call of two clubs artificial here, then some play three clubs as invitational, some forcing, and some a sign-off! But I think everyone would play it as natural and at least five cards. I suggest you use it for invitational values, with forcing hands starting with two clubs. A jump to four clubs might be a self-agreeing splinter for spades – but you did not ask me that…

We do not play two over one, though maybe we should if the deal described below is anything to go by. My partner opened one heart, and with ♠ 7-2,  J-9-2,  K-4, ♣ A-Q-10-8-5-2, I responded two clubs. Then I supported to two hearts at my second turn over my partner’s rebid of two diamonds. We played there, making ten tricks when my partner passed with a 2-5-4-2 hand – he had the top hearts and the diamond ace, and clubs behaved. How should we get to game here?

Underwhelmed, Indianapolis, Ind.

If you play your bid of two hearts as non-forcing, showing 9-11 points with 2-3 card trump support, then you bid precisely what you have. Partner is allowed to pass with a minimum opener – which is exactly what he had. By the way, if you play this style then you should, I think, play a jump in hearts as forcing, not invitational, and bid fourth suit without a fit. The advantages of two over one are that you don’t need to have this sort of discussion.

I’m very distressed to read about the accusations of high-level cheating in international events, and also of various top players cutting corners in national events, many of which have been covered on bridgewinners. com. Are these sorts of incidents widespread, and are there more or less of them now than there were?

Alarm Clock, San Antonio, Texas

First the good news: screens and live camera coverage mean casual cheating is less likely now than before. Also players are far more aware of their ethical obligations now than they used to be. We won’t ever stamp out collusion but we have the capacity to investigate it if the will is sufficient. Alas, that’s the rub. I don’t believe the powers-that-be are sufficiently determined in this area, yet.

In one of your recent columns, South had ♠ A-K-4-2,  Q-J-8,  A, ♣ A-K-J-9-8 and opened two clubs. South seems to be rather lacking in quick tricks, to me. Also, as you described it, the bidding South rebid three clubs over the waiting two diamonds, then over his partner’s call of three diamonds he bid three spades – and got lucky when he found a fit. Would you prefer a rebid of three no-trump at the third turn, notwithstanding the actual 4-4 spade fit?

Going Low, Spartanburg, S.C.

I tend to open one of a minor with two-suited hands and a long minor, since that keeps the auction low. I would do that here. On the actual auction, over the three-diamond rebid (typically a second negative) I’m fine with three spades, even if it might lead to three no-trump played from the wrong side.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 8th, 2017

We never do anything well till we cease to think about the manner of doing it.

William Hazlitt


W North
N-S ♠ 10 5 4 2
 9 6 2
 10 6 3
♣ 8 4 2
West East
♠ J 9 8 6 3
 J 10 7
 K 2
♣ K 9 3
♠ K
 Q 8 5 4
 A J 9 7 4
♣ 10 7 6
South
♠ A Q 7
 A K 3
 Q 8 5
♣ A Q J 5
South West North East
  Pass Pass Pass
2 ♣ Pass 2 Pass
2 NT All pass    

♠6

South’s two club opening bid and two no-trump rebid shows a balanced 22 to 24 points, letting North pass gratefully.

South ducks West’s spade lead in dummy, taking East’s king with his ace. He now has two spade tricks, two in hearts, and at best three in clubs. Where will his eighth come from?

South starts by leading the club jack, hoping that West will duck the trick even if he shouldn’t. When the jack holds, he continues with ace and another club and West wins his king.

West has a safe exit in the form of the heart jack. Declarer wins, and cashes off the 13th club, discarding a heart from the board. When West pitches the spade three, South must now get out from his hand, with a fairly good idea that West began with five spades and three clubs.

It looks natural to exit with king and another heart, but if he does, East will cash the 13th heart, and declarer’s hand will be squeezed.

Best may be to play West for the doubleton ace or king of diamonds (much more likely than that East has passed a hand with both top diamonds plus some major stuffing in third seat, nonvulnerable). So declarer exits with a low diamond from hand. When East wins cheaply, he does best to lead a second diamond to West’s bare king. But now, when West plays his heart 10, South ducks, wins the next heart, and plays queen and another spade. West must win and concede trick 13 to dummy’s 10.


You will probably feel torn here between raising diamonds and making a negative double, to get hearts into the picture. In a way, four hearts is almost as likely to be the best game for your side as five diamonds, with three no-trump an outsider. My guess would be to double, planning to bid diamonds at my next turn at the three or four level if the opponents compete.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J
 Q 8 5 4
 A J 9 7 4
♣ 10 7 6
South West North East
    1 1 ♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].