June 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 29th, 2017
As if you could kill time without injuring eternity.
Henry David Thoreau
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 7
♥ Q 7 5 2
♦ Q 4
♣ K 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 5 3
♥ —
♦ J 10 8 5 3
♣ 8 5 4 3 |
♠ 8 2
♥ K J 8
♦ K 9 6 2
♣ Q J 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 4
♥ A 10 9 6 4 3
♦ A 7
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
The question of when to lead an unsupported ace in a bid and supported suit is a thorny one. I’m generally against it, unless it is clear declarer rates to have discards coming on a long suit. Here that doesn’t seem to be the case, so I would lead a top club.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 3
♥ 6 5 3
♦ 10 5 4
♣ J 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 28th, 2017
|
If declarer puts a card on the table, then indicates he did not intend to play that card, what is the follow-up? Does it matter if the next hand follows suit before declarer picks it up?
Fallen Angel, Naples, Fla.
The difference between a dropped and played card is significant. Accidentally dropped cards can be retrieved by declarer with no penalty, but a played card cannot be retracted. In essence unless a card falls out of declarer’s hand, it is generally deemed played. If the next hand has followed, I can’t see declarer being allowed to retract his card. Contrast the position for the defenders: if a defenders holds a card so their partner can see it, it should be deemed played.
Recently you ran a deal showing a convention called Smolen with game-forcing values and 5-4 in the majors. Can you also use this convention with 6-4 in the majors?
Staying the Course, Latrobe, Pa.
For the record: with game-going values and 5-4 in the majors you bid Stayman then jump in the four-card major to get your side to a 5-3 fit (if there is one) the right way up. That gadget is called Smolen. Stayman followed by four of a red suit can be used as a transfer with 6-4 pattern in the majors, but that requires a partnership agreement.
What is your general agreement about whether it is wise to preempt with a void on the side? Does it matter which seat you are in? And would you ever preempt with a good suit but a five-card suit on the side?
Trouble with Tribbles, Dodge City, Kan.
So long as you have a good six-card suit, I have no problem with having a 6-4-3-0 shape, or even having a weak five-card suit on the side. The critical issue is that your long suit is sound enough to play facing a small doubleton. The late Paul Trent gave his name to that style, but Zia is also a big fan of it.
|
Holding ♠ 10-3-2, ♥ A-Q-J-7, ♦ 2, ♣ A-J-9-4-2, would you respond two clubs or one heart to a one diamond opener — and what are the factors that control your choice?
Taking the High Road, Albuquerque, N.M.
Most strong hands with a five-card minor and a four-card major start with the minor to set up a game force, since it generally allows you to bid your second suit economically. Where, as here, you are borderline for a force to game you could go either way. And this is especially the case with a very good major, where a 4-3 fit might be right, I can see that it might be right to respond one heart and try two no-trump over a one spade or two diamond rebid from your partner
My partner frequently uses a short club opening bid in hopes of finding a fit in a major suit with as few as two cards in the suit. What would be the accepted minimum holding in a standard five-card major system to make such a bid? And should that influence our responding style?
Little by Little, Columbia, S.C.
Playing standard, with 3-3 in the minors I open one club regardless of suit quality, and with 4-4 I open the better minor. Essentially the one diamond opener always delivers four cards, unless it is precisely a 4=4=3=2 pattern. If you want to open one club with that shape, it really should not alter your constructive bidding. The hand comes up so rarely, you can essentially ignore the possibility partner has it.
|
June 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 27th, 2017
Whoever can surprise well must conquer.
John Paul Jones
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 7 3
♥ K 10 3
♦ K Q 8 3
♣ A J 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4
♥ A J 8 6 5 4 2
♦ J 6
♣ Q 2 |
♠ K 10 8 5 2
♥ Q 9 7
♦ A 7 5
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6
♥ —
♦ 10 9 4 2
♣ K 10 9 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
3 NT |
4 ♥ |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
I don’t want my readers to think I’m going soft, but facing a passed partner I think it is entirely reasonable to double rather than overcall one no-trump. With a marginal hand for the no-trump overcall, you can sensibly choose the safer action. Your extra values mean that if partner competes, he will not find dummy unexpectedly disappointing.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 3
♥ K 10 3
♦ K Q 8 3
♣ A J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, May 26th, 2017
The poor man who enters into a partnership with one who is rich makes a risky venture.
Plautus
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ K 9 6
♦ Q 8 6
♣ K 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ A J 8 3 2
♦ 10 9 7 3 2
♣ A 5 3 |
♠ J 10 8 5 4 3
♥ 10 7
♦ J 5 4
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 2
♥ Q 5 4
♦ A K
♣ J 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♥ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Lebensohl
♦10
Did you make a limit raise in hearts? I won’t say this will never work, but I see more points thrown away overbidding facing a major with a balanced 10-count than almost any other way. For your side to make game, partner must have enough to move over a ‘constructive’ raise from one to two. Bear in mind, one of your queens rates not to be pulling its full weight. Just bid two hearts here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6
♥ K 9 6
♦ Q 8 6
♣ K 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, May 25th, 2017
Six months’ oblivion amounts to newspaper death, and resurrection is rare.
Henry Brooks Adams
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ Q 10 3
♦ A 7 4 2
♣ 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ A 9 7 6 5 4
♦ K J
♣ Q 10 8 2 |
♠ K 3 2
♥ 8 2
♦ Q 10 9 6 5 3
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 6 4
♥ K J
♦ 8
♣ A K J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥A
Avert your eyes all readers of delicate sensibility. Partner could easily have set spades or clubs as trump by raising those suits. This is a quantitative sequence, suggesting a balanced 14-15 or so, and in the context of your last call having suggested extras in shape or high cards, you have nothing in hand. So pass, unless playing with someone who never bids four no-trump except to ask for aces.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 6 4
♥ K J
♦ 8
♣ A K J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, May 24th, 2017
Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves.
Lord Byron
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 7
♥ 6 3
♦ A K 10 9 3 2
♣ A 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K 10 8 7 4 2
♦ 6 4
♣ J 9 8 3 |
♠ 10 5 4 2
♥ Q 9
♦ Q 8 7 5
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 8 6
♥ A J 5
♦ J
♣ K 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
Continuations after a reverse are a matter for partnership agreement, not of right or wrong. Some play two no-trump by responder as the weakest action, some play the cheaper of fourth suit and two no-trump as showing weakness. In either case you would bid two no-trump now, planning to give preference to three diamonds. If you play a direct three diamond call as non-forcing, then bid it now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5 4 2
♥ Q 9
♦ Q 8 7 5
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 23rd, 2017
Good management is the art of making problems so interesting and their solutions so constructive that everyone wants to get to work and deal with them.
Paul Hawken
| S |
North |
|
♠ 10 5 2
♥ A J 8 7 6
♦ K 8
♣ J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 9 8 6 3
♥ 3
♦ 9 4 2
♣ 7 2 |
♠ 4
♥ 2
♦ Q 7 6 5 3
♣ K Q 10 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ K Q 10 9 5 4
♦ A J 10
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
Your partner’s somewhat unexpected jump to four clubs sets hearts as trump, and suggests he is interested in slam with a club control — typically based on shortage. You can cuebid four diamonds in return (the fact that this is a second-round not first-round control is not critical). You will pass a reversion to four hearts next, of course.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5 2
♥ A J 8 7 6
♦ K 8
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 22nd, 2017
The concessions of the weak are the concessions of fear.
Edmund Burke
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 5
♥ J 6 2
♦ 5 4 2
♣ A 9 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 9 7
♥ 10 5 3
♦ Q 10 3
♣ Q 7 2 |
♠ Q 8 6 4 3
♥ 9 8 7 4
♦ K 9
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K 2
♥ A K Q
♦ A J 8 7 6
♣ K J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
Your partner’s failure to double suggests a balanced hand with two hearts; maybe 3-2-3-5 or 4-1-3-5 pattern? I would lead a heart, perhaps planning to set up ruffs on defense, but I would lead low in case my partner does indeed have a vulnerable doubleton or singleton honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4 2
♥ J 10 6 3 2
♦ 10 2
♣ K 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
All pass |
|
June 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 21st, 2017
|
I’m a beginner who has been taught the rule of 11 but I need help understanding the logic. Where does ‘11’ come from in a suit from two to ace?
Number Cruncher, Pottsville, Pa.
Think of a bridge suit as running from two to fourteen. The jack is 11 the queen 12, the king 13, the ace 14. When you lead a fourth highest seven, you must have three cards higher than the seven. The other players therefore have four such cards – since there are seven higher cards in total. So in essence the calculation is ‘14 minus 3, minus seven’ to bring you back to 11 minus seven, or four. I’m sure Rube Goldberg could make the explanation simpler…
Holding ♠ Q-3, ♥ Q-10-7-2, ♦ A-Q, ♣ A-Q-8-6-2, I opened one club and raised my partner’s response of one heart to three. When my partner bid four clubs, should I interpret this as natural or artificial and what should I bid?
Wuthering Heights, Bay City, Mich.
Your partner’s sequence suggests slam interest, or he would simply bid four hearts, but equally, he should have no spade control. If he did, he would have bid three spades rather than start by cuebidding a second-round club control. You cannot therefore cuebid four diamonds, or you would promise a spade control. Instead, sign off in four hearts.
I seem to be universally unsuccessful in leading on blind auctions against no-trump, whether or not the opponents have driven to no-trump without bidding a suit or have used Stayman, my choice always seems to cost a trick. What are your rules at matchpoint pairs on blind leads?
Sad Sack, Memphis, Tenn.
When you have a five-card or longer suit, or a sequence, you tend to go for that. The remaining 80 percent of the time, safety is always an option, and when in doubt I will choose a major over a minor. But also bear in mind that leading a card that will mislead partner (like low from three small) may often achieve a bad result, but will simply transfer the blame from you to him.
|
It has been a year or two since the cheating scandals broke into the papers. Do you have any titillating news to report on this subject (or any other exciting gossip)?
Newshound, Saint John, New Brunswick
I can reassure my readers that I have not personally generated any news worth repeating. Bridge players appear to have kept their noses fairly clean in the last 24 months; but if you are looking for news on, for example disciplinary matters, you can follow the breaking stories at bridgewinners.com.
Facing a no-trump opener you recently posed a problem with 5-4 in the majors and a seven-count. You mentioned the option of a transfer, or Stayman then two spades to invite. Can you play mini-Smolen, so that responder could bid his 4-card major at the two level, after a two diamond response to Stayman rebid? That way, opener can right-side playing in a 5-3 major fit.
Bob’s your Uncle, Salinas, Calif.
I think I prefer Stayman followed by two hearts as weak with both majors. I think Garbage Stayman keeps you low, which is a plus. Maybe with five hearts and four spades and invitational values you transfer to hearts then bid two spades? And with spades and a second suit, and an unbalanced invitation, you bid Stayman then follow up with two spades over a two diamond response.
|
June 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 20th, 2017
Two percent of the people think; three percent of the people think they think; and ninety-five percent of the people would rather die than think.
George Bernard Shaw
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8
♥ K 9 8 4
♦ A K Q 9
♣ A 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 6 4 2
♥ A J 6
♦ J 10 8 6
♣ K |
♠ Q 9 5 3
♥ 5
♦ 5 4 2
♣ Q 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 7
♥ Q 10 7 3 2
♦ 7 3
♣ J 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
The three heart call shows 5-6 in hearts and clubs, but does not promise slam interest. It is up to you to let your partner know that in context you are highly suitable for hearts (how could you be any better?). A bid of three spades should be a cuebid – for hearts I think, since you would bid four clubs to set that suit as trump. If you wanted to play spades, you would surely have rebid that suit over two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 6 4 2
♥ A J 6
♦ J 10 8 6
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
As South, you have a very powerful hand but not one suitable for a two club opening. It is better to take it carefully, by bidding your suits in economical order. When North makes the simple raise to two hearts you might just jump to game — but since you need so little to make slam, why not try a delicate two spade call?
This is a long suit game-try, which means it asks North to value his hand on the basis that his partner has honor-third or honor-fourth in spades. North has a decent hand (four trumps and respectable high cards plus a nice spade holding facing length) enough to jump to game. Now South should be prepared to take a shot at slam in the knowledge that his partner rates to be reasonably suitable for his purposes.
When West leads the diamond jack, the simple line for South of winning, then laying down the heart ace, would turn out very badly today. Still, you can afford to be more careful in a slam can’t you?
Trick one goes to the queen, king and ace of diamonds. You cash the club ace, then cross to table with a spade and throw the losing diamond away on the club king.
Now the only danger is 3-0 trumps. Agreed? You can protect yourself against anything if you lead a low trump from dummy and simply cover East’s card. Check it out if you do not believe me. When you put the heart nine on East’s eight you will simultaneously make your day and spoil his!