January 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 20th, 2016
Undoubtedly we have no questions to ask which are unanswerable.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 4
♥ A Q J 10 4
♦ 6 5
♣ Q J 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5
♥ 9 6 3
♦ K Q 10 8 7
♣ A K 8 |
♠ K J 8 7 2
♥ 8 7 5 2
♦ A 3
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 6 3
♥ K
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts and clubs
♦K
You were not planning to compete beyond the two-level. You can be pushed up one level but no more, so should not bid four spades. Can you beat four hearts? I’d expect the contract to be close but if it does make, four spades rates to be down at least two – and probably doubled, to boot. Pass out four hearts and take your chances. (If partner had opened one diamond you might well bid on, though.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 6 3
♥ K
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The past is the only dead thing that smells sweet.
Edward Thomas
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 6 3
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 10 9 6 2
♣ A 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ 10 5
♦ J 8 7
♣ K 10 6 5 2 |
♠ A 9 7 2
♥ K J 6 4 3
♦ 3
♣ J 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 8
♥ A 9 7
♦ A K 5 4
♣ Q 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥10
Declarer surely rates to be shapely, with a void or all the first round controls as he did not use Blackwood. So the question is whether to go active with a diamond lead, or passive with a spade or club lead. The bad heart break argues for going passive. I think I’d lead a trump, and maybe a deceptive club nine might cause some confusion?
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ K J 4
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 1st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
When evaluating whether your hand is worth an opening bid, is it appropriate to count each lengthcard over four in any suit as worth a point? Or should one count shortness – or indeed do both?
Chinese Whispers, Harrisburg, Pa.
When opening the bidding I sometimes use this scale. In my opinion it is particularly valuable with a good six-card suit and marginal values, in that it helps me decide whether to open a weak two or at the one-level. Add your length points to actual points, counting a side four-carder as worth a point, and do not open at the one-level with fewer than 13 (plus one and a half tricks on defense in aces and kings).
I held: ♠ J-7-6-4, ♥ 10, ♦ A-K-8-6-5-3, ♣ K-2 and opened one diamond. When my partner responded one heart, was I supposed to introduce my spades, bid no-trump, or repeat my diamonds to show my limited values? As it turned out, we did have a spade fit, and my diamond rebid meant we lost the suit altogether.
Bad News Bear, Sioux Falls, S.D.
You would never rebid one no-trump with such an unbalanced hand. Your choice is which suit to bid; a player with 6-4 in the minors and a minimum hand might conceal a poor club suit, but should not risk losing a major suit. So the one spade rebid looks the normal call here, despite the weak spots.
When faced with a guess for the trump queen, how valid an argument is it to play the hand on opening lead for the critical card, as opposed to his partner, for the simple reason that sometimes one leads a trump without the queen?
Lady-killer, Baltimore, Md.
|
This is a reasonable argument of last resort. However, since you would never receive a trump lead from a man with a solid sequence of honors in a sidesuit, it will not always apply. But if a defender makes a risky lead in a side-suit for no apparent reason, you might infer he possesses a delicate trump holding. Equally a trump lead often implies equally unattractive side-suit holdings, of course.
I held: ♠ A-7-3, ♥ 9-6-4-3-2, ♦ 8, ♣ Q-6-4-2, and had to lead against four spades. This was after my LHO had opened one diamond and rebid clubs, while my RHO had responded in spades then jumped to four spades. Would you lead a diamond and look for ruffs, while running the risk of giving up a tempo, or setting up dummy’s suit? Or would you lead the fourth suit?
Lorelei Lee, Huntington, W. Va.
I’d say the lead of your singleton is a slight favorite because you have the trump ace to prevent declarer drawing trump. Equally, your absence of side high cards makes it MORE likely you can put partner in. The better your hand, the less attractive the lead of a singleton becomes.
I had a dispute with my partner about how to handle a quasi-balanced hand. He had ♠ Q-4, ♥ K-J-3, ♦ K-Q-J-10-9-2, ♣ A-6. He opened one no-trump and played there, making three when I put down a dummy with nothing but the spade ace and club king. Was I being too harsh when I criticized his choice?
Deputy Dawg, Willoughby, Ohio
I won’t say I’ve never opened one no-trump with a hand like this (especially in third seat) but my instincts are to open one diamond and rebid three diamonds. The hand has such playing strength it is not so much missing three no-trump but missing a slam facing an unpassed partner that would concern me.
|
December 31st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely fool-proof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Douglas Adams
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ Q J 3
♣ J 10 9 8 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 8 3 2
♦ 6 4 2
♣ 5 4 3 |
♠ K J 10 9 8 7
♥ 6 5
♦ K 10 9 8
♣ 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 4 2
♥ K 7 4
♦ A 7 5
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
Your plan here should be to double for takeout and cuebid over a minimum response from your partner. You will then follow up with three no-trump, suggesting a strong balanced hand – too strong for a direct bid of three no-trump. Despite your strength, you cannot guarantee even making game, much less committing your hand any higher, until or unless partner shows signs of life.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 4 2
♥ K 7 4
♦ A 7 5
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 30th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Never apologize, never explain – it’s a sign of weakness.
Frank S. Nugent and Laurence Stallings
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 5
♥ A K 9 7 6
♦ A K 8 4
♣ 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ Q 5
♦ Q 9
♣ A K Q 10 7 |
♠ 10
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ 10 7 6 5 3
♣ 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 6 4 3
♥ 3 2
♦ J 2
♣ J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
The conventional call of two no-trump after a major suit has been doubled (known as Jordan or Truscott depending on which side of the Atlantic you were brought up) shows a limit raise or better in spades, and is a good way to start to show your values and fit. Redouble shows strength but typically denies a fit, and many play two clubs here as non-forcing.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ Q 5
♦ Q 9
♣ A K Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Major Yammerton was rather a peculiar man, inasmuch as he was an ass, without being a fool.
R. S. Surtees
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ J 10 9 6
♦ J
♣ A Q J 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 3
♥ —
♦ A 10 6 3
♣ 9 5 4 2 |
♠ K 7 6 2
♥ 7 5
♦ 9 8 5 4 2
♣ K 7 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A K Q 8 4 3 2
♦ K Q 7
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦** |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Splinter raise
**One key card
♠J
With a hand of this sort (where you are happy to act at least twice) start by bidding one heart, planning to bid two diamonds when and if the opponents bid two clubs. Curiously, this sequence should logically suggest better or longer diamonds than hearts – else why bid the minor at all?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ K 7 6 2
♦ 9 8 5 4 2
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Obsessed by a fairy tale, we spend our lives searching for a magic door and a lost kingdom of peace.
Eugene O’Neill
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8
♥ A 8 4
♦ K J 10 9
♣ A 10 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 7 6 3
♥ J 6 3 2
♦ 4
♣ 5 4 2 |
♠ J 10 2
♥ 9 7 5
♦ A 7 6 5
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K 5 4
♥ K Q 10
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
Without the intervention you would have bid one no-trump. Here that would be most unsound, so the question is whether to raise to two hearts or pass. Some people play the socalled ‘Support Double’ where a double here would show precisely three trump, and a raise to two hearts shows four trump. A good hand for the convention? Maybe; as far as I am concerned, the jury is still out on it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8
♥ A 8 4
♦ K J 10 9
♣ A 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
One minute alone with him is all I ask; one minute alone with him while you are running for the priest and the doctor.
Sean O’Casey
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7
♥ J 8 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ A 10 9 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9
♥ A 6 3
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ Q 6 |
♠ 6 5 4 3
♥ K 7 4 2
♦ 9
♣ J 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A K Q 8 3
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
There are three sensible choices: you might overcall one no-trump, or one diamond, or double, planning to bid one no-trump at your next turn. For simplicity’s sake I think the no-trump overcall has my vote. If for no other reason, the opponents frequently do not lead clubs when that is their best lead. This call also allows partner to transfer, and for your side to find major suit fits only when you want to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A K Q 8 3
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Let us die even as we rush into the midst of the battle. The only safe course for the defeated is to expect no safety.
Virgil
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A
♥ J 6 4
♦ K Q J 8 4
♣ Q J 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6 4 2
♥ 5 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ K 9 7 |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ K Q 8 7
♦ A
♣ 10 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 3
♥ A 10 9 3
♦ 10 9 5 3
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
On this auction it looks clear to lead spades, not your singleton diamond. If you obtain a diamond ruff it may be while setting up the diamonds for useful discards for declarer. The reverse surely is not likely to hold true. In general leading partner’s suit is a better idea – and keeps him happy, even when it is wrong.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 3
♥ K 8 4 2
♦ Q
♣ Q 7 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
My rubber bridge group is doing best to emulate duplicate play by using bidding boxes and trying to use duplicate scoring. Is it correct that honors are used only at rubber bridge? If so, can you explain why there is a difference in scoring here?
Prickly Pair, Waterbury, Conn.
There are no honors at duplicate; they apply solely at rubber when playing in a trump suit — either side can collect them. At no-trump honors are scored only for possession of four aces. I’m not sure why honors went out of fashion – but at duplicate using honors would I think eliminate a skill element and make the game more random.
My question is about the merits of coming in over one no-trump. If playing pairs with ♠ 3, ♥ A-5-4-3-2, ♦ Q-10-5-3, ♣ K-10-4 after your LHO opens one no-trump, would you balance or let them play one no-trump? Would your choice be affected by the vulnerability, or whether you play Cappelletti, where you could show a two-suiter with hearts, as opposed to DONT, showing diamonds and a major?
Defense Sitter, Orlando, Fla.
I would surely balance, since partner is now less likely to go overboard, and would also bid in direct seat if we were not vulnerable. I might not act in direct seat if vulnerable — though my decision might depend on the strength of my partner and the opponents. It is certainly more attractive to show a two-suiter than a one-suiter.
Would you explain what are the commonly used methods in place by responder at his second turn once opener has rebid one notrump? Am I right that it is normal these days that the sequence: one diamond – one heart – one notrump – two clubs should be played at artificial?
Question Master, Torrance, Calif.
|
Opener’s one no-trump rebid shows 12-14 and three or fewer cards in support of partner. Your support and high-cards are still somewhat undefined. So responder has a relay (often called ‘New Minor’) which promises an invitational or better hand. It asks opener to raise partner with three trumps or make a descriptive call. Some use two clubs as artificial, no matter which minor has been opened. Some use both two clubs and two diamonds as artificial.
I held: ♠ Q-9-6-3, ♥ A-K-7-3-2, ♦ Q, ♣ J-8-4 and opened one heart, and heard two diamonds to my left. When this came back to me I doubled for take-out and found my partner with a weak hand, including jack-fifth of diamonds. When he passed, the contract came home with an overtrick. Were either of us way out of line here?
Caught Speeding, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
To my mind you got a little unlucky; your re-opening double looks text-book, with short diamonds, despite your minimum values. As it was, if partner had held the same trump suit on defense and a few values, you might have done quite well on defense. Maybe your possession of the trump queen argues partner does not have a penalty double – but that is Monday morning quarterbacking.
Is there really a convention called Namyats (Stayman backwards)? If so, what is it, and why is it named that?
Side-Show Bob, Elmira, N.Y.
Some people use opening bids of four clubs and four diamonds as good preempts in the corresponding major. Typically these would be solid suits, or semi-solid suits with a side ace. The logic is to get the game played the right way up, and to facilitate reaching slam, since the regular preempt is otherwise so wideranging. As to why it got its name, maybe it is associated with Sam Stayman and his partner, Vic Mitchell.
|
|
All the deals this week were played in the Macallan tournament in London 20 years ago. This was an invitation event, made up of 16 of the top pairs in the world, over the course of three days.
I was delighted to be able to participate in the event with Bob Hamman, along with the other members of the team that had won the 1995 world championships in Beijing. That included Richard Freeman and Nick Nickell, who were playing in their first Macallan, and they naturally took a little time to acclimatize. However, they soon found their stride, and on the following hand demonstrated an elegant route to success on defense against the par contract.
Against three clubs Freeman led the diamond king; Nickell overtook this and returned a second diamond, allowing Freeman to play a third round of the suit. The best declarer Alfredo Versace could do was to ruff high in dummy. At this point he cashed two hearts, to throw away his last diamond. Then he crossed to the spade ace and led a trump. Freeman hopped up with the king and played a fourth round of diamonds, promoting his partner’s club 10 for the fifth defensive trick.
Richard Freeman, who died a decade ago, was one of the more interesting and eccentric members of the bridge community. He had been a Quiz Kid in his youth, and despite early promise as a player in his teens, he gave up bridge to become a tournament director. When he resumed playing the game, he became a champion.