February 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 30th, 2017
(Science’s) methods differ from those of common sense only as far as the guardsman’s cut and thrust differ from the manner in which a savage yields its club.
T. H. Huxley
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ K 9 8 4
♦ 7 4
♣ A Q J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ 5
♦ A Q 6 3 2
♣ 9 8 4 |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 7 2
♦ 10 9 8
♣ K 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6
♥ A Q J 10 6 3
♦ K J 5
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
With an auction of this sort, there are no inferences about whether it is better to lead majors or minors. Dummy doesn’t rate to have four cards in either red suit; declarer could just as easily be weak with hearts as weak with diamonds. It all comes down to the spot cards: the diamonds are far more likely to develop tricks for your side than are the hearts. So I would lead a low diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4
♥ K 6 5 3
♦ Q 10 4 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
February 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I recently encountered a deal where my partner opened a weak-two bid and I needed to find a specific control in a side suit to make slam viable. Do you have any opinion about the use of asking bids facing a weak-two?
Looking for Mr. Goodslam, Wilmington. N.C.
As responder to a weak-two bid, I think new suits should be natural and forcing. You can either use jumps in a major either as invitational, or as a solid suit and forcing if you prefer. I do not play asking bids except to four-level openers but a form of modified Keycard Blackwood is appropriate if partner preempts. (Or maybe it is closer to Gerber – see http://fourseasonsbridge.com/harold/ TOPICS/aa_poor_man.pdf)
At a recent regional my hand was ♠ A-7-5-2, ♥ K-6-5-3, ♦ Q-6, ♣ J-8-2. My partner opened a strong no-trump and when I bid Stayman the next hand overcalled two diamonds. This was passed back around to me. I felt I had game-going values, but hated to commit to no-trump with only a partial stop. Eventually I compromised with a buck-passing call of two no-trump, and we played there, off six diamond winners. Can you comment on what my choices were?
Pistol Pete, Little Rock, Ark.
After intervention at the two-level, opener bids a major if he can do so at the two-level or at the three-level with five or a maximum. He passes with an ordinary hand, and doubles for penalty. Over opener’s pass, responder can do as you did – specifically, double is geared toward penalty, a cuebid suggests short diamonds, two-level calls are natural and invitational with four. Your hand really doesn’t fall well into any of these categories!
I am never sure what calls after passing might be natural and which are artificial. I held ♠ K-J-4, ♥ K-J-4, ♦ A-5-4, ♣ 9-7-5-2, and heard one club on my right. I passed, and now I heard one heart to my left, one spade from partner. After a pass on my right with what call, should I advance?
Catch-up Cecily, Pottsville, Pa.
You have a nice fit, but no club stop for no-trump. A simple raise to two spades would not suffice despite your square shape, so a cuebid of two hearts feels about right on balance. When the opponents bid two suits you bid where you live, rather than asking about hearts.
|
At pairs, with both sides vulnerable I held ♠ K, ♥ J-3, ♦ K-Q-9-6-3-2, ♣ A-Q-J-2, I heard my LHO open one spade, using a strong club system. When this was raised to two spades I came in with three diamonds. Now came three spades to my left, passed back to me. Would you pass, double, or bid four clubs?
Protective Instincts, Texarkana, Texas
I think I would bid, but doubling and hearing partner bid hearts would not thrill me. The choice is four clubs, which is reasonable, or maybe a bid of three no-trump would be both minors with much better clubs. For sure, passing might easily be right, though.
Can you tell me about a convention my partner has been trying to persuade me to take up, namely the Jacoby Two-No-trump response to a major? I like to play this as natural and forcing with no five-card suit and all side-suits guarded; am I out of date?
Diehard, New Orleans, La.
While Transfers, Stayman, and Negative Doubles are surely essential, few other conventions meet that description. The Jacoby raise is certainly useful, but not essential; and the alternative meaning you espouse is certainly a sensible one. I’d encourage you only to add the convention to your armory if you feel it necessary. As an aside, I used to play two no-trump as natural and forcing, with the jump to three clubs as the forcing raise, but I’m not advocating you do that.
|
February 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Few things are brought to a successful issue by impetuous desire, but most by calm and prudent forethought.
Thucydides
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 7 2
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 7 6
♣ K 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 4
♥ A J 7 2
♦ J
♣ J 10 9 5 3 |
♠ J 10 8
♥ Q 8 4 3
♦ Q 10 5
♣ Q 7 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 3
♥ K 10
♦ A K 9 8 4 3 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
It is sensible to play an artificial negative on this auction (whether you play that as two hearts or two no-trump is up to you). But even if you play three clubs as natural and game-forcing, you should bid four clubs with this hand, setting clubs as trump and showing at least a sliver of slam interest. Let partner take it from there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 7 2
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 7 6
♣ K 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Wherefore thou be wise, Cleave ever to the sunnier side of doubt.
Lord Tennyson
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 7 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ 10 8 5
♣ 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6
♥ 10 3
♦ 7 4
♣ K J 10 9 8 6 4 |
♠ J 10 8 3
♥ J 9 7 5
♦ 9 6 3 2
♣ 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q 4
♥ A K Q 2
♦ A K Q J
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦7
Facing an opening bid in any seat except fourth, you would be tempted to jump raise spades, trying to keep the opponents out. Here, partner is marked with a strong hand, so a simple raise to two spades may keep the opponents out, and might also prevent partner from getting too excited.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 5 2
♥ 8 6 4
♦ 10 8 5
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
None but the well-bred man knows how to confess a fault, or acknowledge himself in an error.
Benjamin Franklin
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7 2
♥ A 5 4 3
♦ A 9 4
♣ A 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ J 8 2
♣ Q 5 4 2 |
♠ A 8 6 5 4
♥ K Q 9 6
♦ Q 10 6
♣ 9 |
| South |
♠ K Q 3
♥ 10
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ K J 10 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
This is tricky, since many play two-level responses in a new suit here as non-forcing. But if you redouble you can next bid spades, no matter how many hearts the opponents bid. Equally, a jump to two no-trump shows a limit raise or better. Even though that normally shows four trump, your unbalanced hand makes that action sensible. A splinter jump to four hearts would guarantee four trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 3
♥ 10
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ K J 10 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, January 25th, 2017
Men are so simple and yield so readily to the desires of the moment that he who will trick will always find another who will suffer to be tricked.
Niccolo Machiavelli
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 7
♥ Q J
♦ Q 10 5 4 3
♣ A J 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 2
♥ 10 9 8 6 5 2
♦ A 9
♣ K 2 |
♠ J 9 8 5 3
♥ A
♦ K 8 7 2
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ K 7 4 3
♦ J 6
♣ Q 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Minors
♥10
This hand is worth a raise to three hearts, since your trump honors are working overtime, and your side-suit pattern offers partner the chance to develop tricks in many different ways. The knowledge that your partner has six hearts helps you evaluate your hand positively.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7
♥ Q J
♦ Q 10 5 4 3
♣ A J 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
You cannot fight against the future. Time is on our side.
William Ewart Gladstone
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 7 6
♥ Q 9 6
♦ 7 5 4
♣ Q 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ 5 2
♦ K J 9 8 2
♣ J 8 6 |
♠ Q 8 3 2
♥ 7 3
♦ A Q 10
♣ K 9 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9
♥ A K J 10 8 4
♦ 6 3
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
A call of one heart here shows extras, more than a simple overcall of one heart would have promised. But your hand is far better than that. It is arguable that a jump to two hearts doesn’t do your hand justice, but that alternative of cuebidding two clubs then bidding hearts might set up a game force. So the jump to two hearts will have to do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9
♥ A K J 10 8 4
♦ 6 3
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Our watchword is security.
William Pitt Sr.
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 6 5 3
♥ 9 8 6 4
♦ J 7 5 3
♣ 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ K 5 3
♦ 10 8 6 2
♣ Q J 10 9 7 |
♠ A 8 4
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K Q 9
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 9 7
♥ A Q
♦ A 4
♣ A 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*preemptive
♣Q
While it might be right to cash club winners before they go away, a trump lead is surely the favorite here, since declarer will be planning to ruff spades in dummy. If dummy goes down with three or four small diamonds, the low trump will likely work better than the queen. This is a close call, since West seems to be much stronger than East.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 3
♥ K 8 7 5 3
♦ Q 7
♣ 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
|
What is your opinion as to how to deal with a hand with a five-card major and a weak suit, such as ♠ A-K-2, ♥ K-J-9-7-4, ♦ 9-4-3, ♣ A-J? I elected to open one no-trump and when my RHO balanced into two clubs I tried two hearts, which was not a success. Once I had concealed my five-carder on opening bid, should I leave it dead and buried?
Hidden Depths, Bay City, Mich.
Your initial call was on the money; anything but a one notrump opener will leave you very poorly paced at the next turn. After intervention, you cannot be crimed for introducing your long suit at what seemed to be a convenient level. Sometimes the road to hell is paved with good intentions and well-judged calls.
Could you clarify a point for me about opener’s rebids, if playing 2/1 as game-forcing? Does a reverse at the two-level by opener or a new suit at the three-level guarantee extra values or extra shape?
Rapid Response, Newport News, Va.
I believe (though it is by no means unanimous) that for a sequence such as one spade – two hearts – three clubs opener will not hold a minimum opening bid with 5-4 pattern. Occasionally that requires opener to repeat a relatively feeble major, or bid no-trump when he would rather not do so. I think that is a perfectly reasonable trade off.
One of the very strong pairs in our area seldom bid close games or slams, at Matchpoints Pairs, if they judge the field will not be bidding it. They want to be down the middle in the same contract as the field, and then outplay them. For strong card players, it seems to work out well. What do you think of this approach?
Boondocks, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
I don’t think I agree with such pessimism. I will say bidding grand slams at the club should require you to count 13 tricks. And inviting games (especially at no-trump) and risking the plus score is something to be considered very carefully. That said, I think you try to bid your hand and let the chips fall where they may.
|
Recently you ran a deal where responder to an opening bid of two clubs had an ace and five spades to the king-jack. What is your view on the minimum suit quality required for a positive response – and does it matter whether you make that response at the two or three level?
Waiting for Godot, Augusta, Maine
After a two club opener, the modern style is for suit responses to promise a decent five card or longer suit. A response of two diamonds is thus consistent with a bad hand, or one with values but no long suit worth bidding. For me, a two heart response could be headed by something like the kingjack, if I have positive values, since I’m not preempting my partner’s next call. The same basically applies for a two spade call — though the higher you go, the more you need in the suit.
Recently you analyzed the options for a passed hand with a chunky five-card heart suit of A-J-10-3-2. He responded one heart to one club and heard his partner rebid one spade. You suggested that a rebid by responder in hearts would have implied a six-carder. Is that likely if he didn’t open a weak two?
Seconds Out, Manchester, N.H.
Responder’s suit-rebid guarantees six cards, or a five-card suit playable facing a singleton. A-J-10-8-2 might almost be enough; but remember that since a weak-two bid guarantees a certain strength within the suit, there are plenty of six-card suits you wouldn’t open but might want to bid and rebid after passing.
|
February 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Without leaps of imagination or dreaming, we lose the excitement of possibilities. Dreaming, after all is a form of planning.
Gloria Steinem
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8 5 3
♥ 4
♦ A K 8 5 4 3
♣ A 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 7 6 2
♥ Q 10 9 7
♦ 10
♣ 7 5 4 |
♠ A 10 9
♥ 8 6
♦ Q 9 7
♣ Q J 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ A K J 5 3 2
♦ J 6 2
♣ K 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
You have enough to bid game, not just invite it. A popular convention dealing with opposition intervention over your no-trump is called Lebensohl. There are many versions, but ‘Fast Denies’ (https://www.larryco.com/bridge-learning-center/detail/541) would suggest you bid three no-trump yourself, a call suggesting the values for the no-trump game, without four spades, and without a heart stopper.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9
♥ 8 6
♦ Q 9 7
♣ Q J 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This deal sees South hear his partner make a limit raise in hearts. While he has a promising hand, the likelihood of slam being better than a finesse is very small. Rather than give information away by cuebidding, it is sensible for him simply to raise to game and give West a blind lead.
West nonetheless finds the best lead, of the spade queen, and South sees that he must develop dummy’s clubs without allowing East to get in. The danger is that East would lead a diamond through South, and set up too many winners for the defense.
The clubs allow for the straightforward finesse or ruffing finesse, but there is a danger in winning the first spade and drawing trump, then taking the ruffing finesse in clubs, discarding a spade in the process. The defenders’ communications remain in place, so West could win the club king and lead a spade to his partner, for the killing diamond shift.
The secret is to hold off on the first spade, take the second, draw trump, and lead to the club ace. Now the club queen is led through East for a ruffing finesse. When East puts up the club king, South can ruff and use a trump entry to dummy to take his discards. But if East had played low, South would have discarded his last spade. Even if West had the club king and took this trick, he would be unable to get East in with a spade, thanks to the duck at trick one.