December 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Life is merely a numbers game, a series of odds, and eventually we all lose.
Pete Wentz
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 5 3
♥ J 5 2
♦ K 5
♣ Q 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ K Q 10 4
♦ 10 9 8 4 2
♣ 9 3 2 |
♠ Q 9 6 4
♥ A 8 3
♦ Q 7 6 3
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8 2
♥ 9 7 6
♦ A J
♣ A K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
I’d normally advocate leading a top spade, but I risk losing my potential third trick in the suit. Leading from ace-king when there is length to my right and likely shortage to my left is not attractive. I’d like to get a side-suit going, and hearts looks our best bet for tricks. So I lead a low heart.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 3
♥ J 5 2
♦ 7 5
♣ J 10 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
My left hand opponent opened one diamond and I held: ♠ K-10-7-4-3, ♥ K-10-8-5, ♦ J-3, ♣ J-4. When my right hand opponent responded one spade I passed; now came three clubs to my left and my RHO now bid three no-trump, leaving me on lead. I had to guess which major suit would work out better. Any thoughts as to which way to go?
Witch Hazel, Spartanburg, S.C.
My guess would be to lead a spade. The logic is that finding your partner with almost any top card in spades gives you a chance to set up or run the suit on defense. While leading a heart might set up the suit, with a little luck, you might still have no entry to get in again, and would probably still need tricks from another source to come to five winners. Equally, leading a minor seems too passive to me.
As a regular bridge player, I’m starting to play duplicate and other tournaments more seriously, and I’d be grateful for your advice on what steps I should take in the way of preparation to try to play my best game?
Rhett Butler, Fredericksburg, Va.
It almost goes without saying that you should get a good night’s sleep the night before. Make sure to arrive at your event at least half an hour in advance. Do not eat or drink too much before the event, or indeed between sets. If you can, when playing in two sessions on the same day, try to get some kind of break or rest. And don’t talk about the boards in mid-session if you can avoid it, to preserve energy.
Can you discuss briefly a concept my partner raised: “Never invite facing an invitational bid”? When does it apply – and are there exceptions?
Stop and Go, Duluth, Minn.
|
In essence when one hand raises, or repeats a suit, or jumps in a suit or in no-trump, to create an invitation, you can pass. But if you don’t, pretty much everything is forcing to game. One exception is that if responder invites in no-trump with a rebid of two no-trump, opener can retreat to his own second suit (or a twicebid six-card suit) and have it show 5-5 with a weak hand.
My partner and several members of my club have discussed using ‘Walsh’ responses. Can you explain in simple terms to me how these operate after an opening bid – and does it only relate to responses to one club?
Coal Miner’s Daughter, Louisville, Ky.
Walsh emphasizes responding in a major, if you have one, to one club. With less than invitational values, bid a four-card major in response to one club. You will bypass longer diamonds to find your major-suit fits as soon as you can. If opener hears his partner respond one diamond to one club he should only bid a major with an unbalanced or semi-balanced hand. For he knows there is either no fit in the major, or that his partner will introduce his major over the one no-trump rebid.
I believe I remember reading that that you had made a Grand Slam when missing the ace of trumps. Is that fair – or even legal, since surely a revoke would not deprive the defenders of a trick that was rightfully theirs?
Justice of the Peace, Madison, Wis.
I understand where you are coming from; but the revoke rule is a technical penalty and only peripherally overlaps with the concept of equity. The defenders cannot lose a trick they have already taken, but in the instance I was involved with (in game not in a grand slam) the defenders revoked before winning their only trick, the trump ace. The penalty under the laws is that they lost that trick.
|
December 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
‘The man is a common murderer.’ ‘A common murderer, possibly, but a very uncommon cook.’
Saki
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 6 4 3
♥ 5
♦ A 9 6 5
♣ A 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ 10 8 6
♦ K J 10 8 3 2
♣ 10 5 4 |
♠ K J 5 2
♥ Q 7
♦ —
♣ K Q J 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ A K J 9 4 3 2
♦ Q 7 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
Without your opponents’ double you’d rebid one spade of course. But here when RHO has implied spade length it seems right to emphasize your extra club length at once. If you bid one spade, then should the opponents climb high in diamonds quickly, you haven’t really described the main feature of your hand. You can bid either two clubs or three clubs; I think I prefer the jump but it is close.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 5 2
♥ Q 7
♦ —
♣ K Q J 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, November 25th, 2016
Into each life some rain must fall, But too much is falling in mine.
Allan Roberts
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 10 6 4
♥ K 4
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 7 2
♥ 9 6
♦ A Q J 10 4 3
♣ — |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ A 10 8 5 3
♦ 7
♣ K Q 9 6 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ Q J 7 2
♦ K 9 5 2
♣ A J 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
There are three sensible actions here, if you believe as I do that passing would be too pessimistic. You can introduce your clubs, or rebid in no-trump, either inviting game or driving to three no-trump. I would conceal my clubs and invite game with two no-trump. If partner can’t bid game, we may be too high already.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 6 4
♥ K 4
♦ 8 6
♣ 10 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I’ve got the key to my castle in the air, but whether I can unlock the door remains to be seen.
Louisa M. Alcott
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 6
♥ K 10 7
♦ 10 6 5 4
♣ K J 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 9 7 5
♥ 9 3
♦ Q J 9
♣ 8 5 3 |
♠ K Q J 4 3 2
♥ A J 6 5
♦ 2
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ Q 8 4 2
♦ A K 8 7 3
♣ A Q 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠A
You have no reason to remove the double; but how much do you need to redouble here? At least another queen I’d say. Best is to pass; you have no reason to want to encourage your partner to take another call unless he has a clear action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6
♥ K 10 7
♦ 10 6 5 4
♣ K J 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
When I consider how my life is spent, I hardly ever repent.
Ogden Nash
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 7 2
♥ K Q 9 8 2
♦ A K J 10
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 6 5
♥ A 10 7 6 3
♦ 6 5 2
♣ 2 |
♠ A 10 4 3
♥ 5
♦ 8 4 3
♣ K 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 8
♥ J 4
♦ Q 9 7
♣ A Q J 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
This hand is worth a raise to three spades but is not ideal for a limit raise – which could be shown by the conventional raise to two notrump. This convention is called Jordan (or Truscott) and is commonly in use all round the world. An alternative would be a fit jump to three clubs, showing this sort of black suit mesh – albeit you’d prefer the club queen in addition to your other assets. Either route is acceptable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 4 3
♥ 5
♦ 8 4 3
♣ K 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Homer himself, in a long work may sleep.
Robert Herrick
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A Q 5
♥ J 10 8 5 3
♦ Q 9
♣ 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ Q 4 2
♦ K 4 3
♣ K Q J 9 8 7 |
♠ K J 8 7 4 3
♥ —
♦ J 10 7 6 2
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 6
♥ A K 9 7 6
♦ A 8 5
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
When you have transferred into a major, a double by you at your next turn is not pure penalty. It is card-showing – suggesting invitational values or better. Your partner can chose between defending or reverting to hearts, depending on how suitable his red-suits are for one action or the other.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 5
♥ J 10 8 5 3
♦ Q 9
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Virtue has its own reward but no box office.
Mae West
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 5
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ K Q 9 3
♣ K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 6 3 2
♥ J 9
♦ 7 4
♣ Q 10 4 3 |
♠ Q 4
♥ 6 5
♦ A J 8 6 5 2
♣ A J 9 |
| South |
♠ A 9 7
♥ A K Q 7 3
♦ 10
♣ 8 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣* |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two plus clubs, 11-13 or 17+
♦7
There is no suggestion that either dummy or declarer is going to possess a source of tricks or long suit outside the trumps. So it feels right to go passive rather than lead from an honor into the strong hand. While jack-third is not entirely safe, you rate not to cost your side a trick unless both dummy and your partner have a trump honor – and not always then.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 3
♥ Q 9 7 4
♦ K 10 6 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
December 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I held: ♠ Q-8-4-3-2, ♥ 9-3, ♦ K-10-7-4, ♣ A-5 and heard my partner open one diamond. I responded one spade and when my partner bid two no-trump I raised his diamonds. My partner had a 2-2-5-4 pattern with a strong hand, and passed, thinking I was weak. Which of us goofed?
Cross Purposes, Lakeland, Fla.
You had no reason to look beyond game here but spades or diamonds might easily have been better than no-trump, so your desire to explore with a forcing call of three diamonds made perfect sense. The only way to stop out of game on your actual sequence, unless playing the Wolff Signoff, is to pass two no-trump.
Do you recommend overcalling light, or aggressively, or even playing an artificial defense if the opponents open a strong club? I am familiar with using a double to show the majors with one no-trump promising the minors (Mathe). But is there anything that combines a reasonable level of preemption and relatively low risk for us?
Stepping In, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Mathe is a reasonable method, as is agreeing to preempt and overcall light. A combination of introducing the majors at the one-level when you can and preempting light seems a sensible approach to me. One tends to pass with good hands, then back in where sensible. And if they rebid one no-trump, play your no-trump defense.
Where do you stand on the question of doubling a one heart opener with ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2? If you pass, would you back in after a sequence such as one heart — one no-trump — two hearts? Would your view change if opener rebid two diamonds?
First Strike, Winston-Salem, N.C.
|
First things first. I think doubling here is winning bridge, but I am aware that this is out of line with traditional American (if not Italian) thinking. Change my club jack to the king and I would feel this even more strongly. Having passed, I would not double two hearts at my second turn, but I would double two diamonds, conscious that this is risky, but that I do at least have the unbid suits.
I know how Crawling Stayman works, but with: ♠ J-8-7-6-3, ♥ K-J-4-3, ♦ 2, ♣ 9-8-4 what would you bid after your partner opened a strong no-trump? As I see it, both a transfer to spades and Stayman are flawed.
Guestimator, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Much hinges on your agreements for Stayman followed by two spades over a two diamond call. I often use that sequence as suggesting five spades in an unbalanced hand, but with invitational values. Should you play that, then here you must make a Jacoby transfer with a call of two hearts, to play two spades. It may not be perfect but it is the best you can do, since if you used Stayman you would have to rebid two hearts after a two diamond response, and might miss the 5-3 spade fit.
At my duplicate club my partner recently opened one diamond. I had two five-card majors, with seven points, both suits headed by the queen. I believe if they were four-card majors, you would bid them up the line. How does it work with five-card majors?
Funny Face, Boca Raton, Fla.
One bids four-card majors up the line, bidding hearts to allow partner to get spades in if he has them. If he doesn’t, you will never need to look for a fit there. With five-card majors you hope to be able to bid both over a convenient rebid by your partner, so respond one spade, planning over a no-trump rebid to bid two hearts. Beware! After a rebid in a minor from your partner you will not be nearly strong enough to introduce hearts – that would promise at least invitational values.
|
December 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, November 19th, 2016
Depend upon it sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.
Samuel Johnson
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K Q 6
♥ Q 6 4
♦ 7 5 2
♣ J 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 5 3
♥ 10 9 8 7
♦ 6
♣ K 9 6 3 |
♠ —
♥ A K J
♦ J 10 9 8 3
♣ Q 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 7 4 2
♥ 5 3 2
♦ A K Q 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
It is not my task to lead my readers down the primrose path to vice. But I would feel quite strongly here that there is no practical alternative to a one spade opener in third seat (or even in fourth seat perhaps). In bridge one must not only bid one’s own cards but make the opponents’ life harder. Bidding your best suit, while preempting the opponents a little is often a good idea, and especially here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 6
♥ Q 6 4
♦ 7 5 2
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal may look like another normal strong no-trump auction but it is worth considering if North should simply blast three no-trump in response, and conceal information about declarer’s hand from West.
Personally, I think North should use Stayman here. Whenever you have a little shape such as a doubleton and a weak three-card suit, you rate to want to find a fit if you have one.
Whether the defense starts by cashing three rounds of hearts or not, declarer will need to find the spade queen to make his game. The three heart losers won’t go away whether the defenders cash them immediately, or later.
Since you can pick up queenthird of spades in either hand, the best play here might look like a guess. But it isn’t. And no, the queen doesn’t lie over the jack, nor should you finesse into the defender you like more. There is a solid bridge reason to negotiate the spades correctly.
Pause to consider if you can guard against a possible 4-1 trump break in either hand. Here, the possession of the spade eight is the critical clue. You can’t guard against four spades to the Q-9 in West but you can pick up that holding in East. So start spades by leading to the ace and crucially, follow up by leading the spade jack from dummy, leaving yourself the option of the second finesse against the nine, if necessary. If you play low to the spade 10 on the second round, you will have blown it!