Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 20th, 2017

No man chooses evil because it is evil; he only mistakes it for happiness, the good he seeks.

Mary Wollstonecraft


E North
N-S ♠ 9 8 3
 A 8 7 6 3
 K
♣ A 9 8 6
West East
♠ 6 5
 J 9
 10 9 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 5 3
♠ A Q J 10
 Q 10 5 4
 Q J 2
♣ 7 4
South
♠ K 7 4 2
 K 2
 A 6 5
♣ K J 10 2
South West North East
      1 ♣
Pass 1 * Pass 1
Dbl. 2 2 Pass
2 ♠ Pass 3 ♣ Pass
3 Pass 3 Pass
3 NT All pass    

*Artificial negative

10

In the 1998 Cap Gemini, Tony Forrester and Zia Mahmood went into a huge lead early on. But it had been whittled away, when this board appeared in the final match.

When the second-placed pair reached three no-trump, West led the heart jack in response to his partner’s opening bid. Declarer won with the king and misguessed the clubs. Back came the heart nine, ducked all round, and that was followed by a diamond to the king. Now the defense was ahead in the race to establish their long suit, and declarer had only eight tricks.

Here, though, the opening bid was a nebulous club, and the one diamond response an artificial negative, after which everything was natural. Krzysztof Martens led the diamond 10 to the king, East unblocking the queen.

Tony Forrester naturally cashed the club ace and led to his jack. He ducked the diamond continuation, throwing a heart from dummy, to leave East on play.

Now Marek Szymanowski made the natural play of switching to the spade queen, and Forrester won his king. He cashed the diamond ace, discarding another heart, and took his winning clubs. This reduced everyone down to five cards. Szymanowski had to keep three hearts, so just two spades. Forrester could now lead a spade, win the heart return with the ace and play a spade, to win the last two tricks.

Had East shifted to a heart at trick six, the results of the top two pairs would have been reversed.



Responder at his second turn typically has ways to invite game and to drive to game in opener’s suit – but nothing in between. With this hand you either have to raise clubs invitationally or use fourth suit forcing and force to game. I go for the invitational raise to three clubs, conscious that this is a slight underbid.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 8 3
 A 8 7 6 3
 K
♣ A 9 8 6
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 Pass 2 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, January 19th, 2017

Have no truck with first impulses as they are always generous ones.

Comte de Montrond


E North
None ♠ K 9 7
 Q 10 9
 Q 5 4 3
♣ J 8 7
West East
♠ Q 8 3 2
 8 7
 J 10 7
♣ Q 10 9 4
♠ J 10 6 5
 K J 6
 A K 6
♣ 5 3 2
South
♠ A 4
 A 5 4 3 2
 9 8 2
♣ A K 6
South West North East
      1 ♣ *
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 NT All pass
       

*two plus clubs

♠2

At the Cap Gemini tournament in 1998 one of the contending pairs were Krzysztof Martens and Marek Szymanowski of Poland. Szymanowski is a very tricky opponent, and he produced an excellent false-card against the Hacketts.

After Szymanowski had opened a Polish Club with the East cards, showing clubs or a balanced hand in the 12-14 range, possibly with as few as two clubs, Jason Hackett elected to overcall a strong no-trump, suppressing his five-card major.

As a result he found himself in two no-trump, when his partner Justin Hackett produced an invitational sequence via Stayman. Martens did well to lead spades, the two suggesting a four-card suit, and declarer won the opening lead and played a heart to the nine — and Szymanowski took it with the king!

Then East cleared the spades, and Jason, not unnaturally, repeated the finesse in hearts, allowing the defense a second heart trick. Together with two spade winners and three diamond tricks, that meant two off. Note that if Szymanowski wins the heart jack at trick two, declarer uses dummy’s spade entry to finesse East out of the heart king, and makes eight tricks in comfort.

In retrospect, you might ask yourself if declarer was right to fall for the false-card. Declarer knows East has four spades; the only time the finesse would be necessary is if declarer had eight cards in the minors – which would have to be a 4=1=3=5 pattern or East would have opened one diamond. You make the call!


Had East not responded, the range of your no-trump call would be wide. Your partner’s bid would be a gametry, showing extras and long clubs, and you’d be tempted to bid on, perhaps by raising clubs. As it is, you have shown 7-10 already, and I think his two club call suggests an alternative strain, perhaps with extra shape, not high cards. With a minimum, I would simply pass now.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 9 7
 Q 10 9
 Q 5 4 3
♣ J 8 7
South West North East
  1 Dbl. 1 ♠
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, January 18th, 2017

You only have to do a very few things right in your life so long as you don’t do too many things wrong.

Warren Buffett


W North
None ♠ A K Q J
 Q J 6 4 2
 9
♣ 9 7 4
West East
♠ 9 8 7 4 3
 9 7
 Q J 7
♣ 10 8 3
♠ 10 6 5
 K 10 8 3
 10 5 4 3
♣ A 5
South
♠ 2
 A 5
 A K 8 6 2
♣ K Q J 6 2
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
2 Pass 2 Pass
3 ♣ Pass 3 NT Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 ♠ Pass
4 NT Pass 5 Pass
6 ♣ All pass    

♠9

This deal comes from the 1997 Cap Gemini tournament. Clearly slam is nothing to write home about, since you need something favorable in both minors. Additionally, an initial spade lead causes you some real problems, since it is not clear what to throw on the top spades.

At one or two tables West simplified declarer’s task by leading a heart. However, on the spade lead found by Mark Bompis against Sun Ming of the Chinese ladies, declarer could and did succeed by a fine line.

It is very tempting to try to ruff two diamonds in dummy; if you do this, East can win the club ace and give his partner a ruff. Instead Sun won the spade ace, played a trump to hand, then continued by cashing the diamond ace and ruffing a diamond.

Now she ran the spades, throwing a heart and diamond away. When East ruffed the fourth spade it was with the club ace, allowing South to discard her last diamond.

In other words, declarer got rid of her three losing diamonds and her losing heart by ruffing one diamond and throwing the other three on the spades.

But even had East had a small trump left with which to ruff the fourth spade, declarer would have been able to overruff, and then would have been in good shape to ruff another diamond in dummy. So long as diamonds are 4-3, declarer can return to hand now and play another trump, to concede just one club trick.



Do not be fooled into thinking your partner has guaranteed real diamond support. This auction is entirely consistent with a doubleton diamond in support, from a hand that wants to leave you space to say why you forced to game. Rebid three notrump now and let partner move on only with real support or extras.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 2
 A 5
 A K 8 6 2
♣ K Q J 6 2
South West North East
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
3 ♣ Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, January 17th, 2017

Man is so made that he can only find relaxation from one kind of labor by taking up another.

Anatole France


E North
E-W ♠ K J 5
 K J 8 7
 Q 8 7 4
♣ 10 8
West East
♠ 10 9 2
 10 9 5 4
 10
♣ A K J 9 2
♠ 8 7 3
 Q 6 2
 K J 9 2
♣ Q 7 5
South
♠ A Q 6 4
 A 3
 A 6 5 3
♣ 6 4 3
South West North East
      Pass
1 Dbl. Rdbl. 1 NT
Dbl. 2 ♣ Pass Pass
2 ♠ Pass 3 All pass
       

♣K

On Vugraph at the 1997 Cap Gemini tournament I thought Bobby Levin found a nice play here. It is easy on hands like this simply to assume that you will not run into bad trump splits — and realize too late that you could have done something about it.

West’s initial double might strike some as foolhardy – put me in that group. While the contract of two clubs by West would have gone at least two down, maybe doubled, and two spades might have been a more comfortable spot for South, Levin played in three diamonds.

The defense started with three rounds of clubs. Levin ruffed in dummy and decided to tackle hearts at once, cashing the ace and king, then ruffing in hand. When the heart queen popped up from East, there was an even stronger indication that trumps were not going to split, since East had bid one no-trump, and West had made a take-out double, with five clubs and four hearts. Surely he therefore had three spades and one diamond.

Accordingly, Levin decided to continue with three rounds of spades. When everybody followed, declarer led the fourth round of hearts from dummy and discarded his spade when East, who was down to only his four trumps, ruffed with the diamond nine. In the three-card ending East was now endplayed to lead away from his trump honors. So Levin lost just one more trump trick and came home with his contract.



The auction has worked out just as you hoped when you passed one club. You wanted the opponents to bid and raise hearts, letting you double for takeout. The ambiguity here is that when you back into a live auction (West being unlimited) you might be three-suited with short hearts or have a hand like your actual one. Regardless, your partner can pick between the three suits other than hearts now.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q 6 4
 A 3
 A 6 5 3
♣ 6 4 3
South West North East
    Pass 1 ♣
Pass 1 Pass 2
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 16th, 2017

Two men look out through the same bars: One sees the mud and one the stars.

Frederick Langbridge


N North
None ♠ A K 9 5
 10 9 3
 A K 5 4
♣ K J
West East
♠ —
 8 5 4 2
 J 8 7 6
♣ 10 9 7 4 3
♠ Q 10 3
 K J
 Q 10 9 3 2
♣ A 6 5
South
♠ J 8 7 6 4 2
 A Q 7 6
 —
♣ Q 8 2
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ Pass
5 Pass 5 ♠ All pass
       

♣10

What makes for an exciting bridge tournament for spectators? The 1997 Cap Gemini event, at The Hotel Des Indes in The Hague, certainly qualified. The field of 16 pairs included an enviable array of talent; eight of the 16 pairs had reached the final stages of the recent world Championships in Rhodes. All the hands this week are from the 1997 and 1998 tournaments.

The format of the event over three days was 15 head to head matches in a round-robin format. While the field was bunched at the end of the second day, the last day of the tournament was dominated by Gabriel Chagas and Marcelo Branco, who won their last three matches conclusively to finish up comfortable winners at the end. They demonstrated that even when their opponents stayed cautiously low against them, it was still possible to bring a little sorcery to bear against them.

This is not an easy hand on which to stay out of trouble; five out of the eight pairs bid to a small slam which is about 40%. But Enri Leufkens and Berry Westra managed to stop at the five level, and Branco led a club to Chagas’s ace. Gabriel immediately returned the heart jack! Can you blame declarer for rising with the ace? After all, he was safe against anything but 3-0 trump, and the threat of the heart ruff was sufficiently high, he thought, to make this the right play. He will know better next time.



Declarer rates to be 5-5 in the majors, while dummy will have two or three hearts and short spades. The text book lead is a low trump. I would go with that, but I my second choice would be ace and another trump to kill as many ruffs in dummy as I can. The low trump works if partner has the king, and is certainly more flexible but the trump ace may be more effective if partner does not have a trump honor.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ K 9 7 3
 A 6 3
 8 7 4
♣ Q 7 4
South West North East
  Pass Pass 1 ♠
Pass 2 Pass 2
Pass 2 NT Pass 3
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 15th, 2017

Recently, I have observed many top pairs using a no-trump range of 14-16. Is this done to increase the frequency of opening with that call, or to allow other opening bids to be adjusted down by one point? And do you have an opinion on this lower range?

Weight Lifter, Phoenix, Ariz.

Using the lower range lets you open all balanced 11 counts if you wish. The logic behind having a three-point range for the no-trump opening (be it 12-14, 15-17, or 16-18) is that responder can clarify if opener has a minimum or maximum by inviting. It makes sense for your opening and no-trump rebids each to be three points wide. Of course opening these 11-counts requires you to be more disciplined in inviting or driving to game. Easier said than done.

When looking for an old Aces column I found this source of back hands online: http://aces.bridgeblogging.com/. It appears it is two weeks behind, right? In other words, one cannot retrieve a current deal for a fortnight?

Little Engine, Atlanta, Ga.

Yes; the idea is that the column can only be read timeously in the paper not online. This is a very generous service offered by the syndicator – and I hope it is a way to read the column outside the United States.

I was at favorable vulnerability playing teams when my LHO opened two hearts. I held: ♠ J-4, K-Q-7-4, A-9, ♣ A-Q-74-2. What would you consider the relative merits of balancing with three clubs or two no-trump, or of doubling?

Aces and Spaces, Massapequa, N.Y.

Bidding two no-trump to show a strong no-trump is the mainstream action, and I might do it even if there are many ways that the call could rebound on you. the problem with a call of three clubs is that partner isn’t likely to head for three no-trump. Since doubling is impossible, I think passing at this specific vulnerability might be our best chance to go plus. If we make three no-trump, won’t we collect 300 or so?

I had an opening lead problem against one no-trump, passed out. We were vulnerable, our opponents not, and I held ♠ K-Q- 3-2, Q-10-8-3, -9 4 ♣ 9 6 5. As a couple of subsidiary questions, would you lead differently if LHO had raised to three no-trump? And does the presence or absence of the heart eight affect your lead.

Robber Baron, East Brunswick, N.J.

The heart eight does not affect my choice, but the presence of the heart 10 makes me think a heart lead is better than a spade against either partscore or game. I’m not sure I can explain why except that with the spade ace likely on my right I’m jeopardizing a ‘sure’ trick by leading that suit. Without the heart 10, it is a toss-up.

You recently wrote about second degree assumptions as declarer. This is not a concept I am familiar, with so any help would be appreciated.

Milkman Mike, Mitchell, S.D.

Terence Reese was the first person I know of to discuss the idea of placing the cards that were missing (either onside if you were in optimistic contract or offside if you were in a good one) so as to decide how to play a two-way finesse. This is discussed in Master Play but there are many other books he wrote that should help you in this area.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, January 14th, 2017

History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.

Abba Eban


S North
E-W ♠ J 7 5 4
 A 9 6 5 2
 8 6 3
♣ 9
West East
♠ 10 9 8
 J 4
 K 7
♣ A J 8 5 3 2
♠ 3
 K Q 10 8
 10 9 5 4 2
♣ K 10 7
South
♠ A K Q 6 2
 7 3
 A Q J
♣ Q 6 4
South West North East
1 ♠ 2 ♣ 2 ♠ 3 ♣
4 ♠ All pass    

♠10

In today’s deal from a team game, both declarers reached four spades and received a trump lead.

At one table South decided to play for club ruffs. He won the first trick with the jack from dummy, and played a club to his queen. West returned a second trump after winning the club ace, East pitching the diamond two. South won in hand and ruffed a club, then had to decide how to return to hand.

Believing his opponents’ signals, he crossed to the diamond ace, then ruffed his last club, and now carefully played ace and a second heart. Had he played a diamond first, West would have won his king and led a heart, and could not then have been denied a diamond ruff. As it was, South could subsequently ruff a heart high to hand and draw the last trump, for 10 tricks.

South was optimistic about his chances of a swing, but in the other room declarer won the first spade in hand and ducked a heart. East won to play a diamond, and declarer finessed unsuccessfully. That let West play a second trump. South won the spade in hand to play the heart ace and ruff a heart high, then used the trump entry to dummy to ruff out hearts. He could later ruff one club loser in dummy and pitch one on the fifth heart, to score six trump tricks, two hearts, and two diamonds.

If defenders had won the diamond king to play back a club instead, South could have ruffed two clubs in dummy to come to 10 tricks.



This is the perfect hand for Crawling Stayman – also inelegantly referred to as Garbage Stayman. Your plan when you bid two clubs is to pass a response in a major, or to correct two diamonds to two hearts. That shows both majors and a weak hand, with something less than invitational values.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 7 5 4
 A 9 6 5 2
 8 6 3
♣ 9
South West North East
  Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 13th, 2017

The player on the other side is hidden from us. We know that his play is always fair, just, and patient.

Thomas Huxley


S North
E-W ♠ Q J 5
 8 6 5 2
 A 5 3
♣ K Q J
West East
♠ 7 6 2
 K Q J
 Q 10 8 6 4
♣ 9 5
♠ 8 3
 A 10 9 7 3
 9 7
♣ 10 7 4 2
South
♠ A K 10 9 4
 4
 K J 2
♣ A 8 6 3
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
3 * Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 NT Pass
5 ♣ ** Pass 6 ♠ All pass
       

*shortage **three key cards

K

Today’s deal is very satisfying, in that it illustrates the benefits of Bobby Fischer’s line about strategy at chess. When you find a good line, look for a better one. In today’s deal there was a decent and straightforward line, and a less obvious and better one. Fittingly, the cards rewarded the better play.

When the deal came up, both tables in a team game played in six spades. West had been dealt an apparently attractive top heart lead, though in retrospect he would have done better to lead clubs.

The auction having shown there was no future in hearts, both Wests shifted to clubs at trick two. One declarer drew trump and took the diamond finesse, and his 50 percent line did not come home.

In the other room South won the club king, and ruffed a heart to hand. Now he played the spade ace and a spade to the queen, relieved to see the break would allow him to take a second heart ruff. (Had spades not broken, he would have drawn trump and reverted to the diamond finesse.)

Now it was crucial to go back to dummy with a club (to stop anyone discarding from a doubleton) for the third heart ruff. South could next lead a diamond to the ace, draw the last trump with the spade jack, discarding his diamond loser, and claim the rest.

He had taken three trumps in dummy, three ruffs in hand, two diamonds and four clubs – a perfect example of a dummy reversal, in which the short hand draws trump.



Everyone ought to define what is the weakest action in an auction when a cuebid that forces the partnership to a specific level (here two spades) is doubled. Does a pass or reversion to two spades show a weaker hand? I suggest always using reversion to the trump suit as weakest. That being so, I would redouble two diamonds to suggest the ace, and let partner make the running from here.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 5
 8 6 5 2
 A 5 3
♣ K Q J
South West North East
  1 1 ♠ Dbl.
2 Dbl. Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, January 12th, 2017

This shows how much easier it is to be critical than to be correct.

Benjamin Disraeli


S North
E-W ♠ Q J 4
 K 7
 Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 8 6 4
West East
♠ 8 2
 J 8 6 5 4 3 2
 K 4
♣ 7 3
♠ K 10 9 7 5
 9
 A 7
♣ K 10 9 5 2
South
♠ A 6 3
 A Q 10
 J 9 6 3
♣ A Q J
South West North East
1 Pass 2 2 ♠
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass
       

♠8

Eighty years ago the Culbertson organization was the dominant one in bridge, and because it published the Bridge World it would frequently distribute deals played by Eli or his wife Josephine. However, they miscalculated when they complimented Josephine Culbertson for her play on this hand.

The auction posed South a real problem at her second turn; it might easily have been right to get partner to declare no-trump, but South bit the bullet and opted for the nine-trick game her way up.

Against three no-trump West obediently led his partner’s suit. Josephine Culbertson reportedly called for dummy’s jack and ducked East’s spade king. Now the defenders could lead a second spade, but West had no spade to play when in with the diamond king.

No mention was made of the fact that East had missed the correct defense of ducking the first round of spades. Now when West takes the diamond king and plays back a spade, declarer is toast.

Equally, it may be slightly less obvious, but declarer should have played low from dummy and from hand on the first spade — relying on split diamond honors. Then, no defense beats three no-trump. This idea of ducking the first spade applies equally well if the same contract is reached by North on either a low spade lead to the eight, or the 10 passed round to North. Ducking works equally well in this case too – but is no easier to spot.


Even though your queens are in the suits where partner rates to be short, and so may not be pulling their full weight, you are not ashamed of your hand. So it feels right to give false preference to two hearts, and keep the auction open in case partner is about to show extras. Were the heart king the jack, I might consider passing two clubs.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 4
 K 7
 Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 8 6 4
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 11th, 2017

What a word is truth. Slippery, tricky, unreliable. I tried in these books to tell the truth.

Lilian Hellman


S North
N-S ♠ A K 9
 K 10 2
 7 6 2
♣ A Q 4 2
West East
♠ 8 6 5 3
 6 5
 Q 9 8 3
♣ J 10 9
♠ Q J 10 4 2
 8 7 4
 10
♣ K 8 6 5
South
♠ 7
 A Q J 9 3
 A K J 5 4
♣ 7 3
South West North East
1 Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 ♠ Pass 5 NT Pass
6 Pass 6 All pass
       

♣J

In today’s deal North tries for a grand slam but signs off in six hearts when South cannot bid more than six diamonds over the five no-trump enquiry. (South would have done more with the diamond queen instead of the jack).

When West leads the club jack, South wins the ace and takes one top diamond. If no large diamond appears on his right or left, declarer might well simply draw all the trumps and play a second diamond to the jack. This line would succeed unless East had begun with a singleton diamond.

However, when the diamond 10 appears from East, South decides to take it at face value. He draws two rounds of trump ending in dummy, cashes two spades to pitch his club loser, then leads a diamond toward his own hand, while leaving one trump outstanding.

If East discards on the second diamond, South will win with the king, and give up a diamond. This leaves him in position to ruff a fourth diamond with dummy’s high trump.

However, since nothing can be gained by discarding, East ruffs the second round of diamonds and plays back a spade. South trumps, and can cash the diamond king, then ruff a diamond for his contract.

As an aside, maybe West could persuade you to go wrong if he started life with Q-10-9-3 by dropping the 10 on the first round? You might then draw all the trump before playing a second diamond, and be left with two diamond losers.


You may be tempted to pass, and I might indeed break partnership discipline to do that if slightly weaker. However, this auction is technically forcing. On this sequence, it is modern practice to play the call of two spades as natural but not promising or denying extra values, forcing for one round. So your plan would be to bid two spades, and pass any non-forcing continuation partner produces.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 10 4 2
 8 7 4
 10
♣ K 8 6 5
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2017. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].