November 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
…Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one’s own safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind.
Joseph Heller
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 7 3
♥ Q 10
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 5 2
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ Q 4 2
♣ 9 7 |
♠ A J 4
♥ 7 4 3 2
♦ A K 3
♣ 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Your hand seems just a little too good to pass here, and if you are going to keep the auction open, what call is best and most flexible? I think doubling here for takeout is the best way to get all suits into play. After all, how do you protect against partner having a doubleton club? We’ve all done worse – I think.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 3
♥ K 10
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
A trap is only a trap if you don’t know about it. If you know about it, it’s a challenge.
China Mieville
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ Q 2
♦ K 8 6 5
♣ Q 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8
♥ K 10
♦ J 7
♣ 10 9 8 7 6 2 |
♠ Q 7
♥ A J 8 7 4
♦ Q 10 9 4 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ K 5 4 2
♥ 9 6 5 3
♦ A 3
♣ A K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
Your partner’s failure to overcall suggests no great holding in either diamonds or spades. Does that mean you should go passive with a trump or club lead? I suppose that is possible, but my instinct is to lead diamonds, hoping to get the suit going on defense, perhaps in order to try to establish additional trump tricks for your side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ Q 6 2
♣ 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
November 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I dealt and passed holding: ♠ A-J-5-4-2, ♥ Q-9-4-3-2, ♦ Q-3, ♣ 10. When my partner opened one club I bid one spade and heard my partner respond one no-trump. Would it be right to rebid two hearts or three hearts now?
Rose Red, Pleasanton, Calif.
It is surely sufficient to bid two hearts here. If you do not have a nine-card fit, your hand will not be nearly as promising as it might initially appear. If your partner raises hearts you will bid on of course. However, that will probably not happen, I admit, since your sequence is not technically a constructive one.
I was in third seat with: ♠ J-4, ♥ Q-J-7-2, ♦ K-Q-5-4-3, ♣ 10-4 and heard my partner open one diamond. I responded one heart, the next hand doubled, and partner raised to two hearts, with my RHO now bidding two spades. What would you do now?
Raising the Roof, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Without the opponents bidding, three diamonds should be natural and forcing, at least invitational in hearts. You cannot agree one suit then switch to another suit to correct the partscore; this should be a game try. In competition, I might bid three diamonds intending it to be natural, to help partner locate my values, not minding if partner read this to be a slightly better hand.
Recently in your column I have seen experts bidding weak twos on any six-carder, without reference to suit quality, or indeed even on a five-card suit. Does that mean that I should be considering doing the same thing at my club?
Class Clown, Troy, N.Y.
|
I’d say no. It is important that a partnership preserves some kind of integrity in its standards of preempting. While one can afford to move away from the view that weak-twos require two of the top honors, when you are vulnerable I believe there is a place for discipline — except perhaps in third chair.
I was watching a major championship when I saw two world class players pass over a one club opener, when holding a strong three-suiter with a singleton spade. How good does one have to be to consider action mandatory in this position?
Tom Terrific, Levittown, Pa.
I hate doubling an opening bid with off-shape hands, unless holding at least 17 HCP, the same reaction as the two players who held the hand. After partner bids spades you have to bid no-trump, suggesting 18-20, so you would be misrepresenting your hand by quite a bit to follow this route with less than 17. And it is hard to know how hard to bid on when partner jumps to four spades…
I have a great deal of problems determining whether to lead actively or passively when playing pairs. What determines when to try not to give away a trick, as opposed to leading from honors? Does it depend on the form of scoring, and what about defending to games or slams as opposed to partscores?
Problem Solver, Edmonton, Alberta
Your question is somewhat open-ended. I lead aggressively against small slams and against games, unless it sounds as if suits are not splitting or the opponents are stretching, or if I am leading into a strong hand. Against part-scores I’m less dogmatic. Other than a dislike of leading from ace-fourth (or low from ace-king fourth) at notrump, I have few hard and fast rules.
|
November 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
She should have died hereafter.
William Shakespeare
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ A 5
♦ A J
♣ A Q 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5
♥ J 10 9 4
♦ 9 5 4 3
♣ 8 6 |
♠ 3 2
♥ K 7 6 2
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 6
♥ Q 8 3
♦ K 6 2
♣ J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*12-14
♥J
The phrase “It goes without saying” is almost redundant, especially at bridge. Here it almost goes without saying that when you have game-forcing values facing an opening bid, you should normally respond in your longest suit. Exceptions come when your second-suit is a major and of much better quality than your minor. That is emphatically not so here, so bid two clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ A 5
♦ A J
♣ A Q 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Take short views, hope for the best, and trust in God.
Sydney Smith
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K J 10 5 3
♣ A Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 8 6 2
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ A 6
♣ 8 4 |
♠ J 9 3
♥ A 7 3
♦ 9 8 7
♣ 10 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5
♥ K Q J
♦ Q 4 2
♣ K J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
It would not be wrong to show a good high-card raise in clubs with a cuebid of two hearts. The problem is that if partner fits diamonds, both sides could be making vast numbers of tricks – and how is partner to know that? If you trust your partner to be a sound overcaller, you might jump to three diamonds, a fit jump showing good diamonds and a raise to four clubs or more.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K J 10 5 3
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
We’re making the same mistakes we made 1,000 years ago. So they must be the right ones. So relax.
Chuck Palahniuk
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 10 8 6 5 3
♥ A
♦ J
♣ Q J 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 9 7 4 2
♦ 10 9 8 7 5
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
♠ J 9 7 4
♥ Q 10 8 5
♦ A 6 4
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 2
♥ K J 6 3
♦ K Q 3 2
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣* |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Three key cards with spades trump
♦10
Assuming your RHO’s double is negative rather than penalty, which would normally be the case, your best bet is to pass, and hope that your LHO removes the double – after which your next prayer should be that your partner does not repeat his spades. If you are unlucky enough to have run into a penalty double, redouble here would be rescue and you might risk that action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ 9 7 4 2
♦ 10 9 8 7 5
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Though syllogisms hang not on my tongue, I am not always in the wrong!
William Cowper
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ 8 7 4
♣ J 9 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9
♥ J 10 4
♦ Q J 10 9 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
♠ 6 5 4
♥ K Q 9
♦ 6 5 3
♣ K 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 8
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A K
♣ A 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT* |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Extras and a source of tricks in spades
♦Q
When playing a forcing no-trump you are often faced with the decision of whether to raise a major directly or go through one no-trump, when looking at good sevencounts, or bad eight-counts. Here your bad trumps are to some extent compensated for by the paired heart honors. So I would bid two spades — but if the heart queen were the diamond queen, I might choose the low road.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 4
♥ K Q 9
♦ 6 5 3
♣ K 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
He that is down, needs fear no fall, He that is low, no pride.
John Bunyan
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 8 2
♦ A K J 8 5
♣ K 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ A Q 9 7 3
♦ 6 3 2
♣ 6 5 |
♠ K J 8 7
♥ 10 6 4
♦ Q 4
♣ 9 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5 3
♥ K J 5
♦ 10 9 7
♣ A Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥7
I know that this may cause some people heartburn, or the equivalent, but in my view the first choice here is a simple raise to two spades – and there are no second choices. Too many people are brought up on the idea that opener’s raise of a major guarantees four trump; it does not. Three trump and an unbalanced or semi-balanced hand with moderate trump is more than sufficient reason to raise at once.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 8 2
♦ A K J 8 5
♣ K 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Knowledge must come through action; you can have no test which is not fanciful, save by trial.
Sophocles
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 5
♣ A J 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5
♥ J 9 4
♦ J 9 6 4 2
♣ 7 6 4 |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ 8 6 5
♦ K Q 3
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J
♥ K 10 7 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦4
It doesn’t feel right to lead trump, so the choice is whether to lead from length and whether to attack or go passive. A club is the most passive, a heart the most attacking, and while I can’t give any great reasons for my choice I think a heart is more likely to set up cashable winners for our side than the other options. A diamond combines both safety and aggression. It is a very close call.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ Q 10 2
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ 10 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
November 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I’m currently teaching my family how to play bridge. Would you advise me to teach them weak twos or strong twos? Two other areas I’d appreciate your advice are on the subject of negative doubles and transfers. What is your opinion here?
Tommy the Tortoise, Great Falls, Mont.
These days, weak twos and transfers are almost part of Standard American at every level. My gut instinct is to teach them these methods, early, but I’d leave negative doubles — and indeed all doubles – for a while. Start with the non-competitive auctions; contested auctions should follow later.
Holding ♠ Q-J-7-4, ♥ K-2, ♦ A-Q-10-4-2, ♣ K-3, I assume you would open one diamond rather than one no-trump. If so, what change might you make to this hand to tempt you to open one notrump?
Speed Racer, Leicester, England.
When you have reversing pattern with five of a minor and four spades you would normally open the minor with 17 HCP, or if your points are concentrated in your long suits. This hand is on the cusp, with a minimum strong no-trump and two kings you might want to protect on opening lead. Switch the spade jack and the club three and I bite the bullet and open one no-trump. Sue me.
You recently asked in your column as to what to bid at your second turn with a six-count that included three clubs and two diamonds after an unopposed sequence your way: one diamond – one heart – two clubs. You advocated passing, which I can understand. But doesn’t a new suit by your partner force you to bid?
Blue Label, Jackson, Tenn.
|
New suits by responder are indeed forcing (except by a passed hand). But new suits by opener, be they on opening bid or rebid are NOT forcing. This is unless a game force has already been set up. Thus jump shifts and reverses by opener are forcing – the former being forcing to game, the latter for one round. You should pass two clubs because you want the auction to be over fast. With the same hand and an extra king, give false preference to two diamonds.
My partner introduced me to a new idea he said was all the rage amongst the fancy, this being a second negative by responder after a two club opening. I was used to a rebid of two no-trump at the second turn to show this hand after an initial response of two diamonds. I’m told that it is now appropriate for the lower minor to show the double negative. If so, what do you do over opener’s rebid of three diamonds?
Hero to Zero, Ashville, N.C.
Yes, the lower minor (three clubs over opener’s rebid of two hearts or two spades, three diamonds over a three club rebid) to be used for a really weak hand. If opener rebids three diamonds at his first turn there is no second negative. But some people use opener’s three diamond rebid to be single suited, calls of three of a major show long diamonds and four cards in the bid major.
Against an uncontested three notrump auction and with fewer than six HCP, where do you stand on the issue of leading from length or trying to find partner’s suit. If you go for a short major, with for example Q-8-4, which card would you lead?
Dropping the Mike, Arlington, Texas
Always lead low from this holding, since partner will probably know from the sight of dummy how many high cards to expect. I rarely lead middle from three, though maybe the 10 from Q10x or jack from KJx to unblock the suit, is possible.
|
|
Today’s deal comes from a pair game at my local club game. I was the beneficiary of some inexact defense, though at the time it wasn’t entirely obvious to me who had dropped the ball. In retrospect, though, I think the answer is clear; what about you?
At my table I was South in three no-trump, and West elected to lead a low spade — a small heart might have worked better, I admit. East took the spade two with the ace and continued with the spade jack. I did my best to cover this in normal tempo, and West could not see anything better to do than win and play back a spade.
I did my best to cash my nine tricks without indicating my relief at this turn of events. But of course the defenders had failed to cash their diamond winners – two spades and three diamond tricks making five. Who do you think was at fault?
When the spade two was led, East should have assumed that his partner had one of the missing high spades, so while taking one top diamond might start to establish the suit for declarer, it could hardly be fatal.
Therefore East should cash the diamond king at trick two before returning the spade jack. When West takes declarer’s spade queen with the ace he should know to cash the diamond queen. A third diamond to East’s ace sees the defenders achieve their target without having to rely on one or other of them possessing the spade 10.