January 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 11th, 2017
What a word is truth. Slippery, tricky, unreliable. I tried in these books to tell the truth.
Lilian Hellman
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 9
♥ K 10 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ A Q 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5 3
♥ 6 5
♦ Q 9 8 3
♣ J 10 9 |
♠ Q J 10 4 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ 10
♣ K 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ A Q J 9 3
♦ A K J 5 4
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♠ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣J
You may be tempted to pass, and I might indeed break partnership discipline to do that if slightly weaker. However, this auction is technically forcing. On this sequence, it is modern practice to play the call of two spades as natural but not promising or denying extra values, forcing for one round. So your plan would be to bid two spades, and pass any non-forcing continuation partner produces.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 4 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ 10
♣ K 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.
Neal Boortz
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ K 10 5
♦ K Q 10 5 4
♣ K 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 6 2
♥ 8 6 2
♦ 9 7
♣ J 10 4 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 7 4
♦ A J 3
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5 3
♥ A Q J 9 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
Your partner’s double is value showing, maybe in terms of high cards, a minimum of an eight-count? He typically has a doubleton heart and suggests length in the other suits. I would pass and lead a trump; where are the opponents going to score tricks except from the trump suit?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 5
♥ A Q J 9 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 24th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
No idea is so modern that it will not someday be antiquated.
Ellen Glasgow
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 6 3 2
♥ 8
♦ A Q 10 7 5
♣ 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ A K J 10 7
♦ 8 6 3
♣ K J 8 4 |
♠ 7 4
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ A 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 8 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ K
♣ Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Although the jump to three spades does not definitively lock spades into being trumps, it suggests at most a one-loser suit. The four heart call is still technically consistent with a hand with 5-6 in the reds, but sounds more like a cuebid for spades with no club control. So you should bid four spades now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 10 8 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ K
♣ Q 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 23rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
It is a place with only one post a day…In the country I always fear that creation will expire before tea-time.
Sydney Smith
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 2
♥ K 5
♦ A 10 7 5 4
♣ 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 3
♥ J 10 9 7
♦ K J
♣ Q 6 5 4 |
♠ 8
♥ A Q 8 4 2
♦ Q 9 6 2
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 7 5 4
♥ 6 3
♦ 8 3
♣ A K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT* |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*forcing
♥J
Since the opponents appear to have about 24 HCP between them, to have invited game and stopped in two no-trump, you can tell that marks partner with a relatively light overcall. The lighter his hand, the more likely that he has a decent spade suit. So I would lead my singleton, rather than getting aggressive and leading a club. The spade won’t do anything for declarer that he can’t do for himself.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ Q 9 7 3 2
♦ K 5
♣ Q 9 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
January 22nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
Playing duplicate pairs, when I heard an opening bid of one spade on my right I elected to pass with a 3-4-2-4 12-count. I thought double would be too risky, though this decision was later criticized. When my LHO bid one no-trump and my RHO bid two diamonds, could I have doubled now? As it turned out, we can make two hearts and they can make two diamonds.
Judgment of Paris, Park City, Utah
Your initial pass is perfectly fine; if you double (I might) it runs the risk of partner going overboard in diamonds, or of your walking into a large penalty. At your second turn a take-out double was risky but not entirely unreasonable. Your shape was acceptable so if you had ace-queen fourth in both unbid suits you might gamble it – but it is risky.
As a recent bidding problem you posed the following hand for responder, ♠ A-K-4-3, ♥ K-Q-2, ♦ 8-2, ♣ Q-7-64, on the unopposed sequence: one diamond – one spade – two clubs. You recommend the fourth suit as a game force and then to raise clubs at the three level. But you can only do that if your partner bids two spades or two no-trump. What do you do if partner bids a minor next?
Till Eulenspiegel, Sacramento, Calif.
I think I would rebid three no-trump over three diamonds, but over three clubs I would raise to four. I appreciate that I may miss playing no-trump, and be forcing my partner to the five level, so at pairs the decision would be VERY tough.
At a recent session of rubber bridge there were a few throw-ins, where everybody passed. During the postmortem it was observed that we rarely see or hear about this happening to experts. My question is, how rare is this at duplicate? And are you allowed to re-deal a hand that is thrown in on the first round of a duplicate event?
The Great Shuffler, Richmond, Va.
I wouldn’t say rare, but my experience is that third in hand so often stretches to open on a deal where he has 10/11 points, that the number of pass-outs has dropped dramatically from 40 years ago. And so many 11-counts are opened systemically that I don’t see a pass-out more than once a month. Re-deals are never permitted, by the way.
|
My partner and I play two-over-one. Recently, she had a good hand (16 or so points) with five spades and five hearts. I had 11 points with two small spades and three hearts, and responded with a forcing no-trump to one spade. When she bid two hearts, I took her for only four hearts and bid two no-trump. When she subsequently re-bid spades, I raised to game in spades. That went down one, while four hearts would have made easily. She told me her heart bid in that sequence meant she had five hearts. Is that right?
Shape Shifter, North Bay, Ontario
After your response of one no-trump your partner’s two heart call is quite consistent with only four. If she rebids her hearts that shows 5-5 in the majors, which would accurately have described her shape, if not her assets, since it suggests a minimum hand and is non-forcing over a two no-trump rebid. To show a good hand with this pattern it might be better to bid a doubleton minor to dredge up three-card support for hearts or spades from you.
I had a hand with two aces and my partner was upset that I opened two hearts. Vulnerable, I had: ♠ 9-4-2, ♥ Q-9-6-5-4-3, ♦ A-4, ♣ A-J. I did not count the club jack as pulling its weight, so given the vulnerability, I decided to go low. I made my contract, which got me a top, as most pairs ended up in game down one or two.
Heads Up, Cheyenne, Wyo.
You don’t want to open a weak two with tricks on the side and a feeble suit. When deciding whether to open, my rule is to add up my points, then add one for any five-card suit, two for a six-card suit, and one for any side four-card suit. If it comes to 13, I open at the one level, unless I have less than an ace and king on defense. This hand qualifies a sound one-level opener. And as an aside: never pass a hand with a good suit; open one, two or three.
|
January 21st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I know enough of the world now to have almost lost the capacity of being much surprised by anything.
Charles Dickens
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q
♥ K J 10 6
♦ J 6 4 2
♣ K 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 6 3
♥ 2
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ Q 9 4 |
♠ K 9 5 2
♥ 8 5 4 3
♦ K Q 10
♣ J 10 |
| South |
♠ A 8 4
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ 7 3
♣ A 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*splinter in support of hearts
♠J
Your partner should have extra values and something very close to a 5=3=1=4 pattern. My guess as to our side’s best game is four hearts – though it may be more challenging to play than the 4-4 club fit. Regardless, I would raise to four hearts, and let partner retreat to the club game if he doesn’t want to play hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ K J 10 6
♦ Q 6 4 2
♣ K 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 20th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
All things are full of signs, and it is a wise man who can learn about one thing from another.
Plotinus
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 8
♥ A 4
♦ A 8 7 3 2
♣ A 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 5 4
♥ J 7 3
♦ J 10 5
♣ J 6 |
♠ J 3 2
♥ Q 9 8 6 2
♦ Q 6
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A 7 6
♥ K 10 5
♦ K 9 4
♣ K 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
This hand comes down to a simple choice: do you rebid one no-trump, limiting the hand but running the risk of losing a club fit (especially since partner’s two club call would be a relay — New Minor not natural)? Or do you bid two clubs, showing this basic pattern, but in the process perhaps emphasizing suit quality? Put me down in the two club camp; get your shape right and the rest will follow.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8
♥ A 4
♦ A 8 7 3 2
♣ A 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 19th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The highest intellects, like the tops of mountains, are the first to catch and reflect the dawn.
Lord Macaulay
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 10 9 7 6
♦ K 4
♣ K 10 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 7 2
♥ Q 5 3
♦ Q 9 3 2
♣ Q J |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ J
♦ A J 10 7 6 5
♣ 9 8 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10
♥ A K 8 4 2
♦ 8
♣ A 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
Your partner’s double is between optional and takeout; you are expected to remove the double with any hand where you might hope to make your contract. Since your values, such as they are, are in the right place, you should act. Rather than guess at the best suit to play in, bid four no-trump, showing a two-suiter, and asking partner to pick his better minor. You will correct five diamonds to five hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 10 9 7 6
♦ K 4
♣ K 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♠ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 18th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Chi Wen Tzu always thought three times before taking action. Twice would have been quite enough.
Confucius
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 8 7 2
♥ K Q 7 3 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ 10 5
♦ 9 8 6
♣ Q 9 7 6 |
♠ 10
♥ 9 8 6 4
♦ 10 7 5 4
♣ A J 8 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 3
♥ A J
♦ K J 2
♣ K 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
Whether your partner’s one no-trump call is forcing or not, it doesn’t feel like you should pass here, with an unbalanced hand. But what to bid? My instincts are to bid two diamonds, rather than repeat the hearts, to show six, or to bid two spades, which would require at least an extra king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 7 2
♥ K Q 7 3 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Business you know, may bring money, but friendship hardly ever does.
Jane Austen
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 5
♥ K 7 3
♦ A 8 6 2
♣ A Q 10 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ 10 9 4 2
♦ J 9
♣ 7 2 |
♠ 10 8 7
♥ J 8 5
♦ Q 10 7 3
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 3
♥ A Q 6
♦ K 5 4
♣ J 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*short spades with both minors
♠4
When the opponents intervene in a game-forcing sequence where your side has not found a fit, double by your partner should be penalty, a double by you should be defensive, not guaranteeing more than three trumps. That being so, you have a very easy double; since neither side seems to have a fit and your side has enough high cards for game, you should be able to extract a sizeable penalty.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ K 7 3
♦ A 8 6 2
♣ A Q 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal North tries for a grand slam but signs off in six hearts when South cannot bid more than six diamonds over the five no-trump enquiry. (South would have done more with the diamond queen instead of the jack).
When West leads the club jack, South wins the ace and takes one top diamond. If no large diamond appears on his right or left, declarer might well simply draw all the trumps and play a second diamond to the jack. This line would succeed unless East had begun with a singleton diamond.
However, when the diamond 10 appears from East, South decides to take it at face value. He draws two rounds of trump ending in dummy, cashes two spades to pitch his club loser, then leads a diamond toward his own hand, while leaving one trump outstanding.
If East discards on the second diamond, South will win with the king, and give up a diamond. This leaves him in position to ruff a fourth diamond with dummy’s high trump.
However, since nothing can be gained by discarding, East ruffs the second round of diamonds and plays back a spade. South trumps, and can cash the diamond king, then ruff a diamond for his contract.
As an aside, maybe West could persuade you to go wrong if he started life with Q-10-9-3 by dropping the 10 on the first round? You might then draw all the trump before playing a second diamond, and be left with two diamond losers.