January 17th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
All things began in order, so shall they end, and so shall they begin again.
Sir Thomas Browne
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 3
♥ A K J 6 3
♦ K Q 10
♣ 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5 2
♥ 8 5 2
♦ 7 5 3 2
♣ A Q 10 |
♠ 8 6
♥ Q 10 9 7
♦ 9 8 6 4
♣ 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 4
♥ 4
♦ A J
♣ K J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
Dummy rates to put down three hearts in a limited opener, while declarer should have five hearts and a moderate hand. Since you seem to have the clubs under control, my instincts are to lead a trump to try to kill a ruff in dummy in either spades or diamonds. More to the point, nothing else is even slightly appealing.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ J 9 4
♣ K J 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 15th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
At unfavorable vulnerability, my partner opened one no-trump, and my LHO balanced with two clubs for the majors. When my RHO bid two hearts, my partner protected with a double. I had a doubleton heart, and thought it was unlikely my partner wanted me to bid a minor at the three-level. So I passed, assuming his double to be penalty, but my partner had a minimum hand with two hearts. What did I miss?
Scrambled Signals, Elmira, N.Y.
A simple rule is that when one of you opens one notrump, double of a natural (or potentially natural) call is always takeout if and only if: the partnership has done nothing but pass after opening one no-trump. Having said that, double of a purely artificial call should simply show that suit.
I held ♠ A-Q-7-6-4, ♥ Q-4, ♦ 9-5, ♣ K-J-7-2, and overcalled one spade when my RHO opened one heart. Now came two hearts on my left and my partner doubled. What does that show and what should I have done now?
Fish Finger, Berkeley, Calif.
After the opponents bid and raise a suit, no low-level doubles are for penalty. They suggest cards and the unbid suits. Here I’d expect partner to have the minors, or else invitational values with some spade support, and at least one of the minors. In either case, it looks right to bid three clubs and await developments – if any.
Say the opponents are declaring the hand at no-trump and you are leading from a four-card suit headed by a two-card sequence such as K-Q, Q-J, J-10 or 10-9. When would you lead high, and when would you lead low?
Spotty Muldoon, Vero Beach, Fla.
|
Treat a sequence of this sort as if it were three touching cards if you have the card one away from the sequence such as Q-J-9 or J-10-8, and lead the top card; otherwise lead fourth highest. If you know dummy rates to be short in this suit, or if declarer appears to have a long suit coming down in dummy or in his own hand, then leading an honor from Q-J or K-Q becomes more attractive.
I think I have understood you to say that a jump raise of a major in competition would show more shape and less high-cards than a limit raise. Is that now standard? And is there an upper limit on the cue-bid raise — or does it show less than an opener?
Sixteen Candles, Tacoma, Wash.
The cuebid in competition takes the place of the limit raise when the opponents are not bidding. But the cuebid is unlimited – it is consistent with a slam try. As to whether this treatment is standard or not, my guess is that in duplicate it is close to the norm these days. In rubber bridge, you may have to know your customer.
One of the problems I have with addressing the problems you set in every column is that I never know what form of scoring is in use. Is there room to put that in – or to state the vulnerability?
Clearing House, Chicago, Ill.
I try to avoid being specific here, unless the answer would vary based on one of those factors. Both in the main column and the problem it is probably safe to assume teams (or rubber) is the appropriate form of scoring, not pairs. As to vulnerability: I always state that in the main deal, and you should assume it isn’t relevant in the problem. If it is, I’ll mention it in the answer.
|
January 14th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.
Albert Einstein
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 5
♥ Q 7 6 4
♦ 8 7
♣ K Q 8 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3
♥ 9
♦ A K Q J 10 4
♣ J 9 3 2 |
♠ J 10 4
♥ K J 10 8 2
♦ 9 3
♣ 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 8 7 6 2
♥ A 5 3
♦ 6 5 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Take-out
♦K
While double would be take-out here, and your hand is not the classical shape for this action, the best way to set up a game force and show spades is to double then rebid your suit. Since you would bid a direct two or three spades with a limited hand, this is how to force to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 8 7 6 2
♥ A 5 3
♦ 6 5 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 13th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Live as long as you please, you will strike nothing off the time you will have to spend dead.
Michel de Montaigne
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 7 5
♥ K J 8 4
♦ J 8 4
♣ A 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ 9 7 6
♦ K 9 6
♣ Q J 10 9 6 2 |
♠ J 10 3
♥ Q 10 5 2
♦ Q 10 5 3 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8 6 4 2
♥ A 3
♦ A 7
♣ K 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
There seem to be a lot of points in this deck! Nonetheless you should show what you have by cuebidding two diamonds, promising a high card raise in spades. The fact that you are balanced should not discourage you from describing what you have, and letting partner in on the secret.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5
♥ K J 8 4
♦ J 8 4
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 12th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, December 29th, 2016
The Golden Rule is that there are no golden rules.
George Bernard Shaw
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ 8 5
♦ A K J 5
♣ A Q 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 6 4 3
♥ A K J 10 9
♦ 7 6
♣ 7 4 |
♠ 7
♥ Q 7 3 2
♦ 10 8 3 2
♣ 10 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 5
♥ 6 4
♦ Q 9 4
♣ K J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
In this position there is no need to insist on playing no-trump. Facing a singleton spade, you might struggle in three no-trump while being able to make game or slam in a different strain. Start by bidding two diamonds, which is natural and forcing though typically a five-carder. No-trump can always come later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ 8 5
♦ A K J 5
♣ A Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 11th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
When people will not weed their own minds, they are apt to be overrun by nettles.
Horace Walpole
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 6 5 2
♥ J 10 8
♦ A K Q 3
♣ Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4
♥ K 7 5 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 9 4
♦ J 10 9 4
♣ 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ 7 5
♣ A K J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣* |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Two + cards
♣10
I don’t think you are really worth responding one no-trump here. From my own experience, when facing a third in hand opener I like to be full value for this call (I’d say the range was a good seven to a bad 10). While you might find that the consequence of passing was to miss a partscore, there is a lot to be said for waiting for one round before deciding whose hand it really is.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4
♥ K 7 5 3
♦ 8 6 2
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
You gotta have a swine to show you where the truffles are.
Edward Albee
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 5 4 3
♥ A J 10 6 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ K 7 3
♦ 10 9 7
♣ J 9 7 6 |
♠ J 7 6
♥ Q 9 2
♦ Q J 6 4
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 2
♥ 8 5
♦ A K 8
♣ A 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦* |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Hearts
♠10
First things first: your partner’s double is not penalty. It shows real extras, typically with three hearts. In context you might have enough to jump to four hearts now, or cuebid three diamonds en route to a game in no-trump or hearts. A more cautious approach would be to bid just three hearts, I suppose.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 3
♥ A J 10 6 4
♦ 5 3 2
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 9th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Death is the privilege of human nature, And life without it were not worth our taking.
Nicholas Rowe
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 5 2
♥ 6 5 4
♦ A 6
♣ J 10 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 6
♥ Q 9
♦ K J 8 4 2
♣ K 6 4 |
♠ J 8 7 4 3
♥ K J 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ A 7 2
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ A Q 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦4
The no-trump calls to your right should not unduly alarm you. Lead your long suit, the one you know partner has at least some length in, rather than experimenting with either minor suit – each of which could score a goal, or an own goal.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 2
♥ J 7 5 3
♦ J 6 4
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
I’m confused about the nature of a positive response to an opening two club bid. In one of your recent columns, the responder had 12 points and a five-card spade suit. Why did he not bid two spades? Did he need a better suit?
Field of Dreams, Houston, Texas
I’ll tell you where I stand – but not everyone agrees. A two heart response never preempts partner from his intended call. So I often bid that with positive values and a moderate suit – not necessarily two top honors. A two spade response needs a decent suit, since we may have stopped partner from rebidding hearts at a convenient level. I suggest you use minor-suit responses for unbalanced hands with good suits, and the meaning for two no-trumps…is up to you.
My wife and I read your column to try to improve our bridge. A few weeks ago we saw a hand where one player heard his partner open one spade and the next hand doubled. North had 10 points and four spades; what is the full message intended by his two no-trump response? (My response would have been three spades, by the way!).
Muddy Waters, Portland, Maine
After a double of partner’s major suit, it is sensible to try to keep the opponents out by jump raising his major with a weak hand. In turn, that requires you to be able to use a different call for the limit raise, since the jump raise is no longer available. With redouble showing a strong balanced hand, two no-trump is not needed as natural. Hence you re-direct that call to be at least a limit raise in spades. This convention may be referred to as Jordan or Truscott.
We play a penalty double of the opponents’ one no-trump opener, whether it is weak or strong. Given that you can pass in response to that double with values, with a weak hand should you play a conventional scheme of response or just play natural? And what if the opponents run from one no-trump?
Wellington Boot, Casper, Wyo.
|
I suggest you play Stayman and transfers in response to partner’s double of either a strong or a weak no-trump for penalty. Even with a good, shapely hand you may prefer to describe your hand, and not just to sit for the double. I don’t always play a penalty double of a strong no-trump, but if I did I might play transfers and Stayman there too. When they run, treat your first double as you would the intervention over your no-trump opener.
Recently one of my opponents played through an entire hand before discovering that they had started with only 12 cards, and a diamond was under the previous table. The director said there was no penalty. Is that correct?
Number Cruncher, Woodland Hills, Calif.
When you fail to notice a missing card your revoke, if any, should be punished by the laws in normal fashion. The penalty may be one or two tricks – depending in part on whether the offender personally won the revoke trick – and on how many tricks were won after the revoke.
A couple of weeks ago you answered a question of mine – now I’m giving you the matching hand to that problem. With both sides vulnerable, you hold ♠ A-5, ♥ J-5-4, ♦ Q-8-5-2, ♣ Q-J-7-5. Assuming you pass, what would you bid if partner doubled a one diamond opener, and what would you bid if a one diamond opener was passed round to you?
Elevator, Wausau, Wis.
In balancing seat you cannot double, so the choice is to bid one no-trump or pass. I’d bid if the opponents were non-vulnerable, pass if they were vulnerable. Over my partner’s double, a call of one no-trump looks unexceptionable.
|
January 7th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
There was a long hard time when I kept far from me the remembrance of what I had thrown away when I was quite ignorant of its worth.
Charles Dickens
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 9
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ J 9 8
♣ J 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ A Q 3 2
♦ 3 2
♣ Q 10 9 6 3 |
♠ J 10 8 7 3 2
♥ 8 7
♦ A 6 5 4
♣ K |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ K 10 4
♦ K Q 10 7
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣6
My simple agreement with all my partners about what doubles mean after our side opens one no-trump is as follows. If the only call our partnership has made is to pass, the first double is take-out from either player, whether over or under the suit bid or shown. So here the double of two diamonds is for take-out, and you have a painless call of two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ J 9 8
♣ J 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The auction may look bucolic — essentially South drives to slam facing an opening bid. But he cannot judge exactly which cards his partner has, so gambling on slam seems reasonable; it is, after all, unlikely to be worse than a finesse.
South uses Blackwood after forcing to game and setting spades as trump. When North shows one ace South sees that one ace is missing and contents himself with the small slam.
What would you lead with that West hand? A trump seems sensible; it is unlikely to take a finesse for declarer that he cannot take himself. My second choice is a diamond, my third choice would be the club ace.
When dummy comes down, South must form a plan and count his tricks. He should determine he has 11 top tricks; the 12th trick may come from a club or from an established heart. Best is to win the trump lead, then play off your two top hearts and ruff a heart high (noting that the suit splits 4-3). Now lead a spade to the 10 — you did not waste that card at trick one did you? Ruff another heart, draw the rest of the trump and throw your second and third clubs on the long heart and long diamond. You can give up a club and note, to your pleasure and relief that both the key honors there were offside.
Of course, if the hearts had failed to break, South would be in position to lead a club from dummy, instead of cashing the heart jack.