January 6th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The Brain is wider than the Sky – For put them side by side – The one the other will contain With ease –and You – beside.
Emily Dickinson
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ —
♥ 10 6 5
♦ K 10 8 7 4
♣ A K 10 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 7 5 2
♥ 8 7 3 2
♦ 2
♣ J 3 |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K Q J 9
♦ A J 9
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 6
♥ A 4
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ Q 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
2 ♠* |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Fit showing
♠K
It never does any harm to go over the basics once in a while. A jump to two no-trump is natural and invitational, and describes your values perfectly. In fact with none of your values in partner’s suits, I would not be surprised to discover that if partner passes, we may be too high already. But you can hardly do less. If you wanted to force to game, you would use the fourth suit or jump to three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K Q J 9
♦ A J 9
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 5th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I do not know which makes a man more conservative – to know nothing but the present, or nothing but the past.
J. M. Keynes
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 7 5 4 3
♥ K J
♦ K J 9 8 5
♣ J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 2
♥ 6 4 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ A 7 6 3 |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ 10 9
♦ Q 10 3 2
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A 9
♥ A Q 8 7 5 2
♦ 6
♣ K 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
Fill in the blank…
You may not have much of a hand, but what you have seems to be working for your partner – and you have already showed a poor hand at your first two turns. I’m guessing that if partner wants to bid five of a minor to make or as a sacrifice, you have a good hand for him. I would bid four clubs to let him in on the double fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 6
♥ 10 9
♦ Q 10 3 2
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 4th, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I’m not big on reading directions. I can’t do that. I’m just not from that world.
Richard Dean Anderson
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ J 4
♣ 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ Q 9 2
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ A 10 9 8 4 |
♠ 8 7 6 3
♥ A K
♦ 10 9 3
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10
♥ 8 6 5 4
♦ A K 7 2
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
There are two schools of thought here. One transfers to two spades, one uses Stayman, planning to rebid two spades over two diamonds to show a shapely invitation with five spades. That is a fractional overbid, but I would be prepared to follow that route, to make sure we reached the best major suit for partscore or game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 4 2
♥ J 10 7 3
♦ J 4
♣ 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 3rd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, December 20th, 2016
Undoubtedly we have no questions to ask which are unanswerable.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 4
♥ A Q J 10 4
♦ 6 5
♣ Q J 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5
♥ 9 6 3
♦ K Q 10 8 7
♣ A K 8 |
♠ K J 8 7 2
♥ 8 7 5 2
♦ A 3
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 6 3
♥ K
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts and clubs
♦K
You were not planning to compete beyond the two-level. You can be pushed up one level but no more, so should not bid four spades. Can you beat four hearts? I’d expect the contract to be close but if it does make, four spades rates to be down at least two – and probably doubled, to boot. Pass out four hearts and take your chances. (If partner had opened one diamond you might well bid on, though.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 6 3
♥ K
♦ J 9 4 2
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The past is the only dead thing that smells sweet.
Edward Thomas
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 6 3
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 10 9 6 2
♣ A 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ 10 5
♦ J 8 7
♣ K 10 6 5 2 |
♠ A 9 7 2
♥ K J 6 4 3
♦ 3
♣ J 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 8
♥ A 9 7
♦ A K 5 4
♣ Q 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥10
Declarer surely rates to be shapely, with a void or all the first round controls as he did not use Blackwood. So the question is whether to go active with a diamond lead, or passive with a spade or club lead. The bad heart break argues for going passive. I think I’d lead a trump, and maybe a deceptive club nine might cause some confusion?
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ K J 4
♣ 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 1st, 2017 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
When evaluating whether your hand is worth an opening bid, is it appropriate to count each lengthcard over four in any suit as worth a point? Or should one count shortness – or indeed do both?
Chinese Whispers, Harrisburg, Pa.
When opening the bidding I sometimes use this scale. In my opinion it is particularly valuable with a good six-card suit and marginal values, in that it helps me decide whether to open a weak two or at the one-level. Add your length points to actual points, counting a side four-carder as worth a point, and do not open at the one-level with fewer than 13 (plus one and a half tricks on defense in aces and kings).
I held: ♠ J-7-6-4, ♥ 10, ♦ A-K-8-6-5-3, ♣ K-2 and opened one diamond. When my partner responded one heart, was I supposed to introduce my spades, bid no-trump, or repeat my diamonds to show my limited values? As it turned out, we did have a spade fit, and my diamond rebid meant we lost the suit altogether.
Bad News Bear, Sioux Falls, S.D.
You would never rebid one no-trump with such an unbalanced hand. Your choice is which suit to bid; a player with 6-4 in the minors and a minimum hand might conceal a poor club suit, but should not risk losing a major suit. So the one spade rebid looks the normal call here, despite the weak spots.
When faced with a guess for the trump queen, how valid an argument is it to play the hand on opening lead for the critical card, as opposed to his partner, for the simple reason that sometimes one leads a trump without the queen?
Lady-killer, Baltimore, Md.
|
This is a reasonable argument of last resort. However, since you would never receive a trump lead from a man with a solid sequence of honors in a sidesuit, it will not always apply. But if a defender makes a risky lead in a side-suit for no apparent reason, you might infer he possesses a delicate trump holding. Equally a trump lead often implies equally unattractive side-suit holdings, of course.
I held: ♠ A-7-3, ♥ 9-6-4-3-2, ♦ 8, ♣ Q-6-4-2, and had to lead against four spades. This was after my LHO had opened one diamond and rebid clubs, while my RHO had responded in spades then jumped to four spades. Would you lead a diamond and look for ruffs, while running the risk of giving up a tempo, or setting up dummy’s suit? Or would you lead the fourth suit?
Lorelei Lee, Huntington, W. Va.
I’d say the lead of your singleton is a slight favorite because you have the trump ace to prevent declarer drawing trump. Equally, your absence of side high cards makes it MORE likely you can put partner in. The better your hand, the less attractive the lead of a singleton becomes.
I had a dispute with my partner about how to handle a quasi-balanced hand. He had ♠ Q-4, ♥ K-J-3, ♦ K-Q-J-10-9-2, ♣ A-6. He opened one no-trump and played there, making three when I put down a dummy with nothing but the spade ace and club king. Was I being too harsh when I criticized his choice?
Deputy Dawg, Willoughby, Ohio
I won’t say I’ve never opened one no-trump with a hand like this (especially in third seat) but my instincts are to open one diamond and rebid three diamonds. The hand has such playing strength it is not so much missing three no-trump but missing a slam facing an unpassed partner that would concern me.
|
December 31st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely fool-proof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Douglas Adams
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ Q J 3
♣ J 10 9 8 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 8 3 2
♦ 6 4 2
♣ 5 4 3 |
♠ K J 10 9 8 7
♥ 6 5
♦ K 10 9 8
♣ 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 4 2
♥ K 7 4
♦ A 7 5
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
Your plan here should be to double for takeout and cuebid over a minimum response from your partner. You will then follow up with three no-trump, suggesting a strong balanced hand – too strong for a direct bid of three no-trump. Despite your strength, you cannot guarantee even making game, much less committing your hand any higher, until or unless partner shows signs of life.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 4 2
♥ K 7 4
♦ A 7 5
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 30th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Never apologize, never explain – it’s a sign of weakness.
Frank S. Nugent and Laurence Stallings
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 5
♥ A K 9 7 6
♦ A K 8 4
♣ 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ Q 5
♦ Q 9
♣ A K Q 10 7 |
♠ 10
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ 10 7 6 5 3
♣ 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 6 4 3
♥ 3 2
♦ J 2
♣ J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
The conventional call of two no-trump after a major suit has been doubled (known as Jordan or Truscott depending on which side of the Atlantic you were brought up) shows a limit raise or better in spades, and is a good way to start to show your values and fit. Redouble shows strength but typically denies a fit, and many play two clubs here as non-forcing.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ Q 5
♦ Q 9
♣ A K Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Major Yammerton was rather a peculiar man, inasmuch as he was an ass, without being a fool.
R. S. Surtees
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ J 10 9 6
♦ J
♣ A Q J 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 3
♥ —
♦ A 10 6 3
♣ 9 5 4 2 |
♠ K 7 6 2
♥ 7 5
♦ 9 8 5 4 2
♣ K 7 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A K Q 8 4 3 2
♦ K Q 7
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦** |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Splinter raise
**One key card
♠J
With a hand of this sort (where you are happy to act at least twice) start by bidding one heart, planning to bid two diamonds when and if the opponents bid two clubs. Curiously, this sequence should logically suggest better or longer diamonds than hearts – else why bid the minor at all?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ K 7 6 2
♦ 9 8 5 4 2
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Obsessed by a fairy tale, we spend our lives searching for a magic door and a lost kingdom of peace.
Eugene O’Neill
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8
♥ A 8 4
♦ K J 10 9
♣ A 10 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 7 6 3
♥ J 6 3 2
♦ 4
♣ 5 4 2 |
♠ J 10 2
♥ 9 7 5
♦ A 7 6 5
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K 5 4
♥ K Q 10
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
Without the intervention you would have bid one no-trump. Here that would be most unsound, so the question is whether to raise to two hearts or pass. Some people play the socalled ‘Support Double’ where a double here would show precisely three trump, and a raise to two hearts shows four trump. A good hand for the convention? Maybe; as far as I am concerned, the jury is still out on it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8
♥ A 8 4
♦ K J 10 9
♣ A 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
All this week’s deals come from the late lamented Macallan Invitation teams tournament. 16 of the world’s strongest pairs gathered annually in London to take on one another – and may the best man or woman win!
Early on in the second day Nick Nickell ran into this challenge – and was up to the task. It might have been an easier task had the deal cropped up in a textbook, but real life often imitates art.
Against five diamonds, Nickell received the lead of the spade king. He carefully ruffed in dummy, and led a diamond to his queen; then he abandoned trump, and played off three rounds of clubs. Whether or not the third round of clubs was ruffed, he had saved a tempo, to ensure that he could discard his heart loser on the fourth round of clubs. Today, the lie of the clubs meant he could have continued to play on trump and survived, but his caution would have paid off if East had been 4-4-3-2 instead.
George Mittelman as West did not give his opponents the opportunity to make a textbook play. He was faced with a very different auction after his partner had passed in third seat. He overcalled two spades and heard his LHO jump to four spades, showing shortness and agreeing diamonds. So against five diamonds he led a heart.
Although it is possible to succeed double dummy after this start by following the same line as Nickell did, declarer simply played for trumps to break, and went one down when they did not.