December 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
One minute alone with him is all I ask; one minute alone with him while you are running for the priest and the doctor.
Sean O’Casey
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7
♥ J 8 5
♦ 7 5 2
♣ A 10 9 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9
♥ A 6 3
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ Q 6 |
♠ 6 5 4 3
♥ K 7 4 2
♦ 9
♣ J 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A K Q 8 3
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
There are three sensible choices: you might overcall one no-trump, or one diamond, or double, planning to bid one no-trump at your next turn. For simplicity’s sake I think the no-trump overcall has my vote. If for no other reason, the opponents frequently do not lead clubs when that is their best lead. This call also allows partner to transfer, and for your side to find major suit fits only when you want to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A K Q 8 3
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Let us die even as we rush into the midst of the battle. The only safe course for the defeated is to expect no safety.
Virgil
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A
♥ J 6 4
♦ K Q J 8 4
♣ Q J 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6 4 2
♥ 5 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ K 9 7 |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ K Q 8 7
♦ A
♣ 10 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 3
♥ A 10 9 3
♦ 10 9 5 3
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
On this auction it looks clear to lead spades, not your singleton diamond. If you obtain a diamond ruff it may be while setting up the diamonds for useful discards for declarer. The reverse surely is not likely to hold true. In general leading partner’s suit is a better idea – and keeps him happy, even when it is wrong.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 3
♥ K 8 4 2
♦ Q
♣ Q 7 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
My rubber bridge group is doing best to emulate duplicate play by using bidding boxes and trying to use duplicate scoring. Is it correct that honors are used only at rubber bridge? If so, can you explain why there is a difference in scoring here?
Prickly Pair, Waterbury, Conn.
There are no honors at duplicate; they apply solely at rubber when playing in a trump suit — either side can collect them. At no-trump honors are scored only for possession of four aces. I’m not sure why honors went out of fashion – but at duplicate using honors would I think eliminate a skill element and make the game more random.
My question is about the merits of coming in over one no-trump. If playing pairs with ♠ 3, ♥ A-5-4-3-2, ♦ Q-10-5-3, ♣ K-10-4 after your LHO opens one no-trump, would you balance or let them play one no-trump? Would your choice be affected by the vulnerability, or whether you play Cappelletti, where you could show a two-suiter with hearts, as opposed to DONT, showing diamonds and a major?
Defense Sitter, Orlando, Fla.
I would surely balance, since partner is now less likely to go overboard, and would also bid in direct seat if we were not vulnerable. I might not act in direct seat if vulnerable — though my decision might depend on the strength of my partner and the opponents. It is certainly more attractive to show a two-suiter than a one-suiter.
Would you explain what are the commonly used methods in place by responder at his second turn once opener has rebid one notrump? Am I right that it is normal these days that the sequence: one diamond – one heart – one notrump – two clubs should be played at artificial?
Question Master, Torrance, Calif.
|
Opener’s one no-trump rebid shows 12-14 and three or fewer cards in support of partner. Your support and high-cards are still somewhat undefined. So responder has a relay (often called ‘New Minor’) which promises an invitational or better hand. It asks opener to raise partner with three trumps or make a descriptive call. Some use two clubs as artificial, no matter which minor has been opened. Some use both two clubs and two diamonds as artificial.
I held: ♠ Q-9-6-3, ♥ A-K-7-3-2, ♦ Q, ♣ J-8-4 and opened one heart, and heard two diamonds to my left. When this came back to me I doubled for take-out and found my partner with a weak hand, including jack-fifth of diamonds. When he passed, the contract came home with an overtrick. Were either of us way out of line here?
Caught Speeding, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
To my mind you got a little unlucky; your re-opening double looks text-book, with short diamonds, despite your minimum values. As it was, if partner had held the same trump suit on defense and a few values, you might have done quite well on defense. Maybe your possession of the trump queen argues partner does not have a penalty double – but that is Monday morning quarterbacking.
Is there really a convention called Namyats (Stayman backwards)? If so, what is it, and why is it named that?
Side-Show Bob, Elmira, N.Y.
Some people use opening bids of four clubs and four diamonds as good preempts in the corresponding major. Typically these would be solid suits, or semi-solid suits with a side ace. The logic is to get the game played the right way up, and to facilitate reaching slam, since the regular preempt is otherwise so wideranging. As to why it got its name, maybe it is associated with Sam Stayman and his partner, Vic Mitchell.
|
December 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The only defense against the world is a thorough knowledge of it.
John Locke
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7
♥ A 7
♦ A K J 8
♣ Q 10 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ K Q 10 9 8 6 3
♦ 5 3
♣ 4 |
♠ Q 10 8 5 3
♥ 4
♦ 9 7 2
♣ K 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ J 5 2
♦ Q 10 6 4
♣ A J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
3 ♥ |
5 NT* |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
*Pick a slam
♥K
This pattern does not handle well after a one club (or worse, a one diamond) opening bid. Settle for the least lie and open one no-tump. Yes, you may find yourself getting too high if partner has a long major. Equally, you may well miss game if you treat the hand as a balanced 12-14. And the club intermediates argue that going low would be something of an underbid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7
♥ A 7
♦ A K J 8
♣ Q 10 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Nothing true or beautiful or good makes complete sense in any immediate context of history; therefore we must be saved by faith.
Reinhold Niebuhr
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 6 2
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K 2
♣ A J 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ 10 8 2
♦ 10 7 6 4
♣ K 7 4 |
♠ K 10 3
♥ 6 5
♦ 9 5 3
♣ Q 10 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7
♥ A K Q J 3
♦ A Q J 8
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
This hand is on the cusp of a two spade response, but I’d suggest caution today, and go low with a bid of one spade. Here, your weak trumps coupled with the fact that you have only four, and the poorly positioned diamond king are all danger signals. Also, the fact that you have a doubleton diamond means you may have duplication of shape. A doubleton in hearts would be a far more promising holding.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 6 2
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K 2
♣ A J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
O for a life of sensations rather than thoughts!
John Keats
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 7 4
♥ A K 10 4 2
♦ —
♣ A 10 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 2
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 10 8 3 2
♣ K Q 9 6 |
♠ A 5
♥ J 7 6 3
♦ A Q 9 7 5
♣ J 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 6 3
♥ 5
♦ K J 6 4
♣ 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
The two spade call is artificial (partner can’t hold spades). It suggests at least a high-card raise to three clubs, a direct club raise being more about shape than high cards. Your extra shape makes your hand worth at least a shot at game; but should you make a splinter jump to four diamonds? That may direct the spade lead – but bear in mind your RHO didn’t double two spades, so I vote for the splinter.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4
♥ A K 10 4 2
♦ —
♣ A 10 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
As a teenager you are at the last stage in your life when you will be happy to hear that the phone is for you.
Fran Lebowitz
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 8 6 4
♥ A J 8 3 2
♦ 5
♣ 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5
♥ 10 7 4
♦ K J 10 9 8 6 4
♣ 6 |
♠ 10 3 2
♥ K 9 6 5
♦ 7 3
♣ J 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 9
♥ Q
♦ A Q 2
♣ A K Q 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♦* |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 7 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three key cards for spades
♦J
I know inflation is striking at every part of our life. I’m here to tell you this is a perfectly respectable one spade opener. Thrice blessed is he who gets his blow in first, and with your values focused in your long suits, it is far better to get your suits in quickly, and make the opponents’ life harder, than to pass and regret it later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 6 4
♥ A J 8 3 2
♦ 5
♣ 7 4 |
December 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The man who said ‘I’d rather be lucky than good’ saw deeply into life. People are afraid to face how great a part of life is dependent on luck.
Woody Allen
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ A K 7
♦ 7 4
♣ 10 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 7
♥ Q 6 4 3
♦ A Q 6
♣ J 8 2 |
♠ J 9 5 3
♥ —
♦ 9 8 5 2
♣ K Q 9 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ J 10 9 8 5 2
♦ K J 10 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
Despite the fact that you know there is a trump stack in hearts against your LHO, you have no reason to assume you can defeat two hearts. If you wish to compete further, and I would, this is a perfect hand on which to bid two no-trump, suggesting this sort of pattern in the minors. Since you didn’t bid no-trump at your previous turn, this must be the equivalent of an unusual no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5 3
♥ —
♦ 9 8 5 2
♣ K Q 9 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The combat deepens. On ye brave, Who rush to glory or the grave!
Thomas Campbell
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K J 8 5
♥ 6 4 2
♦ J 9 5
♣ A Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 2
♥ J 10 9 5
♦ A 10 6
♣ 10 8 4 2 |
♠ A 4
♥ K 8 7
♦ 8 7 4 2
♣ K 9 6 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 7 3
♥ A Q 3
♦ K Q 3
♣ J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Limit raise with four trump
♥J
This is not an auction where partner is guaranteed to have heart length, but he is surely favorite to have four cards in that suit. The choice of leads is really between the spade 10 and a low heart – I can’t see much argument for leading the heart jack when dummy is quite likely to have a doubleton honor. I vote for the heart.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ J 9 3
♦ 10 5 2
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
With both sides vulnerable you are in second seat holding ♠ 10-8-7-2, ♥ K-8-7-6, ♦ K-J-6, ♣ A-9 and hear an opening call of one diamond to your right. Where do you stand on making a light takeout double holding both majors, but only a doubleton club? Incidentally, if you pass, partner would re-open with a double; what now?
Mac the Knife, Twin Falls, Idaho
I don’t mind a double and would do it at non-vulnerable for sure. This might be the right vulnerability to pass, though. After hearing the re-opening double I’d bid two diamonds, a cuebid, expecting partner in response to do more than make a simple call in a major with full values. At pairs I plan to pass a simple response in a major.
When RHO opens a minor, I would appreciate some guidelines as to my best action when holding a strong hand with a good six-hard major and a singleton in the other major. Doubling may result in LHO or my partner upping the ante inconveniently in the other major, while a simple overcall doesn’t really express the value of this hand. If you do not play strong jumps, how do you cope with the problem?
Rumblefish, Little Rock, Ark.
Bidding one heart, planning to take more action the next time, is the modern style. When you feel too strong for that, you may have to double and correct partner’s minimum action to show your power. If he does more than that, you should be able to underwrite game. While a jump to two of a major would be weak, in balancing seat the jump shows 13-16 or so. And for what it is worth, I play intermediate rather than preemptive jumps when vulnerable.
I held: ♠ J-9-7-3-2, ♥ A-9, ♦ A-6-3, ♣ Q-10-4 and heard one diamond from my partner, two clubs on my right. I felt my spades were too weak to bid, so I doubled and bid two spades over my partner’s two heart response. My partner passed now, thinking I was weak, and we missed game. What should I have done?
Negative Energy, Princeton, N.J.
|
Doubling an overcall then bidding a new suit shows a hand too weak to make that call directly. Your action suggested six spades and 8-10 points, perhaps. Of course your actual hand is hard to describe. Doubling then bidding two no-trump may be best, though remember that a simple two spade call does not guarantee a good suit.
I was dealt: ♠ A-J-7-4, ♥ A-K-9-4, ♦ K-5-3, ♣ 10-4 and heard my RHO open one club. I doubled, and when LHO raised to two clubs my partner doubled that, which I took as responsive, suggesting both majors. I bid two hearts and my partner converted to two spades. What does this sequence show, and was I right to pass?
Great Dane, Danville, Ill.
I’m not sure I know precisely, but I’d expect invitational values, perhaps with spades and diamonds? With fewer values he would surely just bid two spades directly, since you have guaranteed at least spade tolerance for your initial double. I think I have enough to raise to three spades and let partner clarify for himself.
A long time ago I started to learn bridge, and fell in love with it but gave it up for 40 years. At this point how would I go about finding a group that would both welcome and instruct beginners on the game? I’d appreciate any recommendations you have.
Welfare State, Fremont, Calif.
Believe it or not Sheinwold’s “Five Weeks to Winning Bridge is still a good starter. A more recent book is Audrey Grant’s series on bridge basics. Writers I enjoy reading are Reese on the play of the cards, Mike Lawrence – a clear and concise author – with Eddie Kantar for humor. You might care to google the Grant books and see if any look suitable for you – and email me for more suggestions!
|
|
In today’s game the fate of the contract went from ‘healthy’ to ‘moribund’ at trick one, and the contract sank without trace at trick three.
South might have upgraded his hand into a one diamond opener, planning to rebid two no-trump over a major-suit response. The quick tricks in diamonds make that a sensible evaluation. But his side got to game anyway; all he had to do was bring it home.
After West led the spade queen, declarer played by rote, rather than addressing the real problem of the deal, when he ducked in both hands. Now forced to win the second spade in dummy, he started on diamonds, and when the 4-1 break came to light there came to light, he had no fallback play available. The clubs could be set up, but not cashed.
South should have worked out that if diamonds were breaking 3-2 now, they would still be breaking 3-2 later on in the deal. It was therefore right to go after clubs before diamonds, playing king, ace and a third club. If they broke 3-3 or the queen or jack fell doubleton, then the contract could be brought home.
This line requires a re-entry to the North hand, hence South needed to keep the spade ace intact and win trick one with the king. Then declarer can go after clubs directly, and the fall of the queen makes life easy. Even if one player had the club suit doubly guarded, South would still come home if diamonds broke.