October 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
You recently raised the issue of the many names given to various modern doubles. Isn’t the first requirement to agree when Penalty Doubles apply? Beyond that, any double that is not a conventional alertable call, should not even need a name — partner can simply work out what it must mean in the context of the auction.
Monkee Mike, Fayetteville, N.C.
Up to a point, I agree. But some doubles (Snapdragon doubles to show the fourth suit) may be counter-intuitive, so do require detailed agreement. Even the simple responsive double isn’t entirely straightforward. A relatively modern expression of “you’ll recognize it when you hear it” is otherwise not too far from the truth.
I was reading about the ‘Vanderbilt Trophy’ recently. Was the donor connected to the Commodore of the same name?
Lost Louis, Springfield, Mass.
Harold Vanderbilt was a famous bridge player, and a great grandson of the Commodore. He devised and codified the rules of bridge, 100 years ago, and presented the trophy that bears his name as well as playing the game at the top level. He lived to a ripe old age and died less than 50 years ago.
When partner sets up a game force with the fourth suit, which takes precedence, raising partner or bidding no-trump? when I held ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2 I opened one club and responded one spade to my partner’s one diamond call. Now he bid two hearts, and I wasn’t sure what to focus on next.
Pigling Bland, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
First things first: I might have bid one no-trump at my second turn, knowing partner either didn’t have spades or would bid them at his next turn. That said, I’d definitely bid two notrump next. Diamonds can wait, and when in doubt the more economical action leaves more room to explore.
|
Where do you stand on the appropriate number of cards to hold when preempting? I’m often torn between a three-level action on a six-card suit, or even the occasional five-card weak two in third seat. If you feel the same urges, when if ever do you give in to them?
Cave Man, Dodge City, Kan.
For sure a three-club opener may be six (since you have no other preempt available). Hands with high offence and low defense (say, a suit of KQJxxx especially when accompanied by some side-suit shape) might more closely resemble a three-level preempt than a two-level action. The same occasionally applies to a five-card two-level preempt; but they are the exception.
I wasn’t sure how to advance this hand from a recent duplicate pairs tournament at our club. I responded one no-trump to one spade, and when my partner bid two hearts I gave preference to two spades with ♠ J-4, ♥ K-8, ♦ A-5-3-2, ♣ Q-10-5-3-2. Now my partner bid three hearts and I thought I had to go to game but wasn’t sure whether to pick spades hearts or no-trump. What would you recommend?
Direction Finder, Albuquerque, N.M.
Since you are clearly not in a game-forcing auction you can bid four of a minor to get partner to pick a game if you think that appropriate and partner would understand this. I suppose your partner could technically be 6-5 either way round, but I imagine if he had a strong hand with 5-6 in the majors he would have opened one heart, planning to reverse into spades. So my best guess would be to bid four spades now rather than three no-trump.
|
October 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
You beat your pate and fancy wit will come; Knock as you please there’s nobody at home.
Alexander Pope
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7 3
♥ 6 4 3
♦ J 8 4
♣ A Q J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 6 2
♥ K Q J 10 7
♦ K 9 5
♣ 9 |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ 9 5
♦ 10 7 6 2
♣ 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 5
♥ A 8 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ K 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
If playing a forcing notrump you have to bid (at least in theory) facing an unpassed hand. While I would always bid a four-card minor if I had one before rebidding my five-card suit, here suit quality plays a part in the decision. I am tempted to bid two hearts – for the honors – as I will explain to my partner later, even if playing duplicate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6 2
♥ K Q J 10 7
♦ K 9 5
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
In a world of diminishing mystery, the unknown persists.
Jhumpa Lahiri
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 8 6 3 2
♥ 2
♦ K Q 10 3
♣ Q 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5
♥ K J 3
♦ J 9 7 4
♣ J 10 5 |
♠ K 10 4
♥ 9 8 7 5 4
♦ 8
♣ A 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A Q 10 6
♦ A 6 5 2
♣ K 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣* |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Checkback
♣J
There is no need to tell your partner what he has in his hand when you can ask him, hence your delicate invitation to game with the call of two no-trump. Your partner then indicated he had a weakish hand with four diamonds, unsuitable for an initial preemptive raise. Since you have precisely what you promised at the previous turn, just pass now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J
♥ A Q 10 6
♦ A 6 5 2
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The chapter of knowledge is very short, but the chapter of accidents is a very long one.
Lord Chesterfield
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 7
♥ J 2
♦ Q J 4
♣ A 7 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3
♥ K 8 7 5 4 3
♦ 10
♣ J 10 8 3 |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ 9 6
♦ A K 8 5 2
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 8
♥ A Q 10
♦ 9 7 6 3
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦10
When partner competes over a take-out double, you should only join in a second time if you have extras in high cards or shape. Here you have neither so you have an easy pass. For the record: double if the club two were the king, raise to three diamonds with your minors switched.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 7
♥ J 2
♦ Q J 4
♣ A 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
He was cut off out of the land of the living.
Book of Isaiah
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 7
♥ A Q 7 4 2
♦ —
♣ A J 10 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6 4 2
♥ 3
♦ K J 10 8 5
♣ 5 3 |
♠ A 9 3
♥ K J 10 9 8
♦ 7 4
♣ Q 7 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5
♥ 6 5
♦ A Q 9 6 3 2
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
This hand shows one of the downsides of playing New Minor Forcing. You cannot sign off in two diamonds – that call has been subverted to becoming a forcing relay. Pass one no-trump, hoping partner can run the diamonds in one no-trump. With the spades and diamonds switched it would be much more attractive to bid two spades. Here, though, your weak spots argue against that action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 4 2
♥ 3
♦ K J 10 8 5
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
It is more noble to give yourself completely to one individual than to labor diligently for the salvation of the masses.
Dag Hammarskjold
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 10 8 7 5
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 9 7
♣ A 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ K Q 8 5 3
♦ J 4 3
♣ K 9 6 3 |
♠ —
♥ A J 9 7 2
♦ K 8 5
♣ Q 10 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 6 3 2
♥ 4
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
5 ♥ |
5 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥K
An easy one? If playing two over one, you may not have high-card extras, but what you have is suitable for slam. Cuebid your club ace with a call of four clubs, and hope partner can take control. This doesn’t promise real extras, it just suggests a hand prepared to cooperate for slam. If partner was merely inviting game, bid it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 8 7 5
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 9 7
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Nothing contributes so much to tranquilize the mind as a steady purpose – a point on which the soul may fix its intellectual eye.
Mary Shelley
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 10 5
♦ 10 8 6 4
♣ A K 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K J 8 2
♦ K Q J 7 2
♣ 8 4 3 |
♠ 9 8 7 5
♥ 9 7 3
♦ A 5
♣ Q J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 4 2
♥ A Q 6 4
♦ 9 3
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
I would normally lead a doubleton, looking for a ruff, but here my spades are too weak and my club honor potentially too significant for this to feel right. Since my partner is quite likely to have a doubleton heart, I don’t like opening up that suit either, so it is a toss-up between diamonds and spades. I go for the diamond three.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K 10 8 7 2
♦ 10 4 3
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
Both vulnerable, you are in fourth seat holding ♠ J-8-5-2, ♥ Q-J-4, ♦ A-Q-J-7-6, ♣ 5. Your RHO opens one heart. There appeared to be two plausible options: first, a take-out double, seeking a spade fit, planning a rebid of two diamonds over a two club response by your partner — i.e. equal-level conversion. The second choice would be a two-diamond overcall. Where do you stand on this?
Craft Fair, Palm Springs, Calif.
You did not consider an initial pass, which I might well vote for. Certainly a two diamond overcall is preferable to a double – equal-length conversion is all well and good, though I don’t subscribe. But even if I did, I’d need (for example) the heart ace instead of the queen for that.
Playing in a sectional team event, I picked up ♠ K-Q-J-9, ♥ 9-4, ♦ K-Q-7-5-4, ♣ 10-8 and in second seat at favorable vulnerability I elected to open one diamond. Subsequent developments were not to my liking, and my partner indicated my decision was a poor one. What do you think?
Larry the Lamb, Johnstown, Pa.
I would pass most 11-counts with this pattern especially a collection with no aces, but I can see why you would open a hand with good suits and an easy rebid over the likely simple response of one heart. I’d also yield to temptation, I admit it. That said, if you switch the majors, so that your rebid is more awkward over a one spade response, I might pass.
If you were going to travel abroad to play bridge, where would you recommend going?
Travelin’ Man, Raleigh, N.C.
|
The tournaments in France in the summer (especially Cannes and Biarritz) allow you both to play and enjoy life. The Spring Fours in Stratfordon-Avon in May is also a fun and challenging event. But my favorite recent event was the Gold Coast in Brisbane, Australia — a week of fun, bridge, sun and sand.
My partner opened one club and rebid one spade over my one heart call. With ♠ Q-J-8-2, ♥ A-10-3-2, ♦ 5-3, ♣ Q-8-4 would you raise to two spades or three spades? I thought my club fit would be useful enough to take the aggressive position.
Upping the Ante, Elkhart, Ind.
This hand is only worth a simple raise. Partner will be pleased you were restrained if he has the most likely hand-type, a balanced 12-14. But if he has more he rates to take another call anyway, so you will be unlikely to miss a good game. Incidentally, I could understand raising an opening one spade bid to three – partner’s fifth spade makes a big difference.
Playing 2/1, how should responder continue after he responds one no-trump to a major, and his partner raises to two no-trumps? Do Wolff Signoffs apply? What about transfers — or is it best to play natural?
Mercy Me, Bellingham, Wash.
It is reasonable to play three hearts over partner’s original spade opening as forcing, but three of a minor can be passed. Maybe best, if hard to remember, is to play transfers. Transferring into partner’s suit is consistent with a weak raise, but opener can do more than complete the transfer with the right hand. If responder shows an ‘impossible’ suit (spades after having responded one no-trump to one heart) that shows both minors.
|
October 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Little things affect little minds.
Benjamin Disraeli
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 4
♥ 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ 9 6 4 2
♣ 8 7 |
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ K Q
♦ 10 7 5
♣ A Q 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 3
♥ A 7 5 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
This is something of a crap-shoot. It would be right to balance if partner has values, whether he is long in diamonds or not. It is wrong to balance if you let the opponents find a better fit or turn a plus score into a minus. My diamond honors persuade me to pass, but with the heart queen in addition I’d consider overcalling one notrump, showing 11-15 HCP. I’d feel stronger if one or both sides were non-vulnerable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 4
♥ 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Avoidance is paying forward that which I would be much wiser to pay off.
Craig D. Lounsbrough
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 5
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ 7 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3 2
♥ 8 7 4 3
♦ J 10 8 4
♣ J 9 |
♠ Q J 9 8 6
♥ 5
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ A 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A K Q J 10
♦ 2
♣ K Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Where you are playing two over one game forcing, you have enough for a cuebid of four clubs. You have great controls, and plan to bid four hearts if partner cooperates with four diamonds. If you play this sequence is only invitational to game, then you have more than enough to bid four spades, but not enough to cuebid for slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 8 6
♥ 5
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ A 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal has something of a contrived air to it, but it is entirely logical, so long as you apply yourself in the right way.
After West opens one heart, South has a choice of balancing actions. It is standard expert practice (not that this means too much these days!) to use a call of two no-trump in protective seat as natural and strong not the minors. So South balances with two no-trump and North raises to game.
On the lead of the heart king, South knows both missing kings are on the left and that West has five hearts. It looks easy to strip out his clubs and endplay him to lead one of those suits for you, but one more trick is not sufficient. The problem is that the run of the hearts will squeeze your own hand. Even if you only cash two clubs, you will find that on the run of the hearts dummy has to come down to two cards in each of spades and diamonds, and you must also come down to a doubleton in one of those suits, letting West exit in that suit.
The winning line is to play West for a singleton club. Win the second heart, cash just one club then exit in hearts, planning to pitch two clubs from hand, while letting go a diamond and a spade from dummy. On West’s forced exit in either diamonds or spades win dummy’s jack, then take your ace in the other suit, (the Vienna Coup) and now run the clubs to squeeze West.