October 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
It was beautiful and simple as all truly great swindles are.
O. Henry
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ K 7 2
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 6 3
♥ 8 5 4
♦ A 8 4
♣ 9 7 |
♠ K 10 4
♥ 7 6 3 2
♦ 9 6 5
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ K J 9
♦ Q J 10 3
♣ J 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
There is no rule against using Stayman on flat hands. But the weaker your major, the less attractive it is. Here a 4-4 or 5-4 heart fit might be right if the diamonds were open; equally, a 4-4 heart fit breaking badly might go down when the no-trump game came home. And Stayman may allow a lead-directing double or reveal declarer’s shape to the defense. So I’d just raise to three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 4
♥ 7 6 3 2
♦ 9 6 5
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Pessimism… is, in brief, playing the sure game… It is the only view of life in which you can never be disappointed.
Thomas Hardy
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ Q 6
♦ Q 10 7 6 4
♣ 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ K J 9 3
♦ A K 8 3
♣ J 10 8 2 |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ 8 7 5 4 2
♦ J 9 5 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 7
♥ A 10
♦ —
♣ A K Q 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Unlike the auction in today’s deal, you cannot raise partner’s suit with only two, and your diamonds are not quite good enough to bid. I’d make a second negative of three clubs, and hope to get my values across later. You can always raise or give preference to hearts at your next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6
♥ Q 6
♦ Q 10 7 6 4
♣ 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Never apologize, mister, it’s a sign of weakness.
John Wayne
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 8 7
♥ 4
♦ 10 6 5
♣ A K Q 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3 2
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ K 7 3
♣ 6 4 3 2 |
♠ 5 4
♥ A K 9 8 6
♦ A J 9 2
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 9 6
♥ 7 5 3
♦ Q 8 4
♣ J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
You may not be able to justify this on high cards alone, but I would certainly feel very sympathetic to a jump to three spades rather than a simple call of two spades. Since you plan to compete to three spades if necessary, and you have a great hand on offence compared to defense, why not use up that extra round of bidding at once?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 8 7
♥ 4
♦ 10 6 5
♣ A K Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 26th, 2016
There is no one giant step that does it. It’s a lot of little steps.
Peter A. Cohen
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 8 5 2
♥ J 8 3
♦ A 2
♣ J 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7
♥ 7 2
♦ K Q 10 8
♣ 10 8 7 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 9 4
♥ 6
♦ 9 7 5 4 3
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
♠ 6 3
♥ A K Q 10 9 5 4
♦ J 6
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
Different experts will give you advice always (or never) to lead doubletons here. I refuse to do so: when as here you have no attractive suits to lead from, look for safe leads, then if there are none, the least offensive lead. Here I think a club is less likely to cost a trick outright within the suit itself than a heart or diamond. Others may disagree; that is what makes horse racing.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3
♥ K 6 4
♦ Q 6
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
October 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
I have a question about the unobstructed sequence of Stayman followed by three of a minor over a two diamond response. My partner and I play this as showing a strong five-card minor with slam potential opposite the no-trump. An expert at our club has been taught that it should be weak and to play. What would you recommend the above sequence be used for?
Watcher in the Night, San Antonio, Texas
You are right, the expert wrong, in my opinion. With a weak hand and 4-5 pattern don’t use Stayman but pass one notrump. With a weak hand and 4-6 pattern, simply transfer to the minor. Remember, the perfect is the enemy of the good.
These days there seem to be unlimited versions of Blackwood. Could you comment on whether my partnership should learn any modifications such as Keycard, Exclusion… or even something else?
Enquiring Mind, Honolulu, Hawaii
Whether you play regular or Keycard Blackwood is up to you. I admit that as the world has moved toward Keycard, my objections to it have lessened somewhat. As to Exclusion: the idea is that an unusual jump when trumps have been set – normally to the five-level or at the four level above the partnership suit – asks for keycards. It shows a void in the jump-suit, hence responder ignores that ace in that suit. Be prepared for at least one disaster if you decide to play it.
Holding ♠ K-J-9-3, ♥ 7, ♦ A-J-8-7-5-2, ♣ J-3, would you open with a weak two bid, or at the one level? Or would you prefer to pass, and back in later?
Open Question, Riverside, Calif.
|
I’d never pass this hand; I like to open hands with good suits. However, I try to avoid a weak-two with a decent four-card major on the side if I can. I accept these two pieces of advice may occasionally conflict, as here. On balance, I’d open one diamond, except perhaps in second seat vulnerable, where my idea of a weaktwo closely resembles a hand of this sort. The playing strength of the hand equates to most opening bids.
Recently I saw a deal where you remarked that the odds of a suit splitting 3-3 were about one in three. Since there are six different lengths each opponent could have, why isn’t the chance closer to one in six?
Counting by Numbers, Naples, Fla.
Not all breaks are equally likely. The closest to a general rule I can give you is: an even number of cards will split evenly about one time in three, those odds going down as more cards are involved. (The most likely break when missing an even number is one away from even – be it 3-1, 4-2, or 5-3). When missing an odd number of cards, the odds are two in three that they split as close to evenly as possible. This percentage declines gradually as the total number of missing cards increases.
What is the cut-off point for the suit quality of an overcall? Holding ♠ Q-7-3, ♥ A-2, ♦ Q-10-9-6-4, ♣ A-10-3, would you overcall one diamond over one club – and how about a call of two diamonds over one heart?
Rumblefish, Bremerton, Wash.
A one-level overcall in a hand this strong is just fine. You should almost never overcall at the two-level on a suit that weak (give yourself the club queen as well and I might feel compelled to bid). But I’d like a six-card suit or a better five-card suit before I make a two-level overcall. Here I would double one heart rather than overcall, since this shape is close enough to the classic three-suiter short in hearts.
|
October 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 24th, 2016
Patience is not passive; on the contrary, it is active; it is concentrated strength.
Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7 3
♥ A K Q J
♦ A 5
♣ J 10 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 9 8 4
♥ 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ K Q 6 |
♠ 6 5
♥ 10 7 5
♦ J 10 9 8 4 3
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 2
♥ 9 8 4 3 2
♦ Q 7
♣ A 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦* |
2 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♥6
Your partner has shown the equivalent of an Acol Two opening – eight to nine playing tricks in hearts. This is not 100 percent forcing but the next best thing to it, and despite your notable absence of high cards your doubleton club and spade are just enough to raise your partner to game. Don’t expect any overtricks.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5
♥ 10 7 5
♦ J 10 9 8 4 3
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 23rd, 2016
Can an Ethiopian change his skin, or a leopard his spots
Proverbs
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 6 5
♥ J 5
♦ K Q J 6
♣ Q 9 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 3
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ 10 9 3 2
♣ — |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ 10 9 6 3
♦ 8 4
♣ K J 10 8 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ K 7 2
♦ A 7 5
♣ A 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
In the absence of complex partnership agreements to describe this hand, you may be better off simply making a quantitative jump to four notrump. This focuses on the minors and lets partner judge his range and shape better than you can. Incidentally, this is one of the very few sequences where Gerber would apply.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5
♥ J 5
♦ K Q J 6
♣ Q 9 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.
Soren Kierkegaard
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 7 3
♥ A K
♦ J 6 3
♣ K 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4
♥ Q J 10 6 3
♦ K 5 4
♣ 10 9 7 |
♠ 6 2
♥ 9 8 5 4 2
♦ A Q 9
♣ J 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 8 5
♥ 7
♦ 10 8 7 2
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
I may be going out on a limb here, but I like a penalty double here. Your partner will pull with real extra shape (especially if he has concealed spade support) but if he has a balanced hand with spade shortage you surely want to defend here – don’t you?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 8 5
♥ 7
♦ 10 8 7 2
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I learned that we can do anything, but we can’t do everything… at least not at the same time. So think of your priorities not in terms of what activities you do, but when you do them.
Dan Millman
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 6
♥ K J 10 2
♦ 8 3
♣ Q 10 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 5 4
♥ 8 5 3
♦ A 10 6 4 2
♣ 4 |
♠ 10 9 7 3 2
♥ 7
♦ Q J 9 5
♣ A 5 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J
♥ A Q 9 6 4
♦ K 7
♣ K J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Limit raise with four trump
♣4
I agree with not opening one no-trump here. But how to advance after the double? You could simply bid two clubs, or if you play redouble as strong (and not a support double promising three spades) that would be fine too. Passing or bidding one no-trump just seems wrong, though – you may never catch up.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J
♥ A Q 9 6 4
♦ K 7
♣ K J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
You know my methods. Apply them.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 5 4
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A
♣ A J 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 3
♥ 2
♦ Q 10 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 5 |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ K J 9 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 6 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ 9 6 3
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦5
It is easy to construct hands where your side can make game in hearts? Does that mean you should bid on? Absolutely not! When you know your side rates to have at most 24 HCP and an eight-card or possibly even a seven-card trump fit, you should pass unhesitatingly here. At pairs the calculation is even easier, since you really want to protect your plus score if you can.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A
♣ A J 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Some people play South’s two no-trump response shows a balanced 13 to 15 points, with no four-card major, while others would bid three no-trump with this hand. Here when South shows his minimum game-force, North can raise to three notrump without considering any other action.
After a spade lead South can determine that to make game he needs a total of four tricks from the minor suits. Each suit will easily furnish three tricks but no more, so South will need to utilize both suits in some fashion to make his game.
If South follows a straightforward approach, the opponents are likely to win an ace, then knock out the spade queen. They will now be in position to take their second ace and run the spades, defeating the contract.
South must therefore try to steal one trick in clubs or diamonds. He can then switch to the other suit, and make his game by knocking out the second ace.
There is little chance to engineer a swindle in clubs, but the diamonds are a horse of a different color. South should lead the diamond jack at trick two, as though planning a finesse against the queen. Even though South owns the diamond queen, his opponents don’t know this.
As South hopes, West plays low on the diamond jack, since it is far from clear that he wants to stop South from losing a finesse to East’s presumed diamond queen.
Having thus stolen a diamond trick, South can shift his attention to clubs and ensure his nine tricks.