October 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
You know my methods. Apply them.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 5 4
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A
♣ A J 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 3
♥ 2
♦ Q 10 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 5 |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ K J 9 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 6 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ 9 6 3
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦5
It is easy to construct hands where your side can make game in hearts? Does that mean you should bid on? Absolutely not! When you know your side rates to have at most 24 HCP and an eight-card or possibly even a seven-card trump fit, you should pass unhesitatingly here. At pairs the calculation is even easier, since you really want to protect your plus score if you can.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A
♣ A J 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 19th, 2016
Geeks are people who love something so much that all the details matter.
Marissa Mayer
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A 4 3
♥ 8 3 2
♦ K Q
♣ A Q 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ K Q 10
♦ 9 4 2
♣ J 10 8 5 |
♠ 8 5
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ A 8 7 6 5
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 7 6 2
♥ A 7 4
♦ J 10 3
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Where you have raised diamonds and thus cannot be short in the suit, the best lead seems to me to be the diamond nine, which should prevent partner from allowing declarer to score a singleton honor unnecessarily. It might also persuade him to shift, rather than to try to cash out diamonds.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 2
♥ J 3
♦ 9 7 4 2
♣ A 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
| 3 ♦ |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
October 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I was faced with an opening lead problem here. My LHO opened one diamond and my RHO jumped to two no-trump, passed out. I had to select a lead, holding ♠ Q-J-4-2, ♥ 8-7-4-2 ♦ J-7 ♣ A-Q-4. What would your thoughts be on a choice of opening lead?
Start Right, Seneca, S.C.
My cards don’t appear to lie particularly well or badly for declarer, so I’m not looking for an especially active or passive lead. My choice would be a low spade (NOT the queen, without a significant spot card such as the nine or maybe eight) or else a heart. Depending on partnership style, I lead the eight or seven. Again, NOT a small heart here.
Two questions: can you comment on when a defender should follow with the top of a sequence and when with the bottom card of a sequence? And is there a generally understood position about discarding honors such as kings or queens in mid-hand?
Painting a Picture, San Francisco, Calif.
The discard of a jack or higher is typically the top card of a sequence and denies a higher card in the suit. So if I had to discard from A-J-10-9 I’d pitch the 10 or nine, not the jack. As second or third hand you follow with the lowest card of your sequence, but on lead you lead the highest card.
An expert bridge-playing friend of mine is in the hospital. Could you recommend a book by a funny writer about bridge that might cheer him up?
Word Wise, Ketchikan, Alaska
|
George S. Kauffman’s story ‘The Great Kibitzers’ Strike’ is one of the funniest bridge stories, and explains the role of the kibitzer very well. Eddie Kantar is always entertaining, and you can check out other possibilities here.
Holding ♠ 9-6-4-2, ♥ A-J, ♦ K-3, ♣ Q-10-7-4-2 I heard my partner open one heart, and I chose to conceal my spades and respond one no-trump. Over his two diamond rebid I gave preference to two hearts. This was a playable spot but two or perhaps even three no-trump might have been makeable. Was my first action misguided?
Lost Horizon, Lorain, Ohio
I’m not sure you did anything so terrible here. Bypassing a weak major is a trifle unilateral, but acceptable, and sometimes helps partner to evaluate his hand when he is short in that suit.
Do you use the Michaels cuebid only with 5-5 or greater shape? Or can some hands with a weak five-card major and a strong four-carder qualify?
Joe Blow, Albany, Ga.
When you hold 5-4 in a major/minor two-suiter do not use Michaels. Equally, with 5-4 pattern and both majors you would tend to bid spades if that suit were longer, since your rebid at hearts is so much easier than if the suits are the other way round. By contrast, you can come in over a no-trump by using Landy or the like with 5-4 pattern, and similarly after the opponents open, then respond one no-trump.
|
October 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Calamities are of two kinds: misfortunes to ourselves, and good fortune to others.
Ambrose Bierce
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 4
♥ 10 6
♦ K Q 8 5 4 3 2
♣ A 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 8 7 5 3
♥ K 9 3 2
♦ —
♣ 8 3 |
♠ 6 2
♥ A Q 5
♦ J 9 6
♣ Q J 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9
♥ J 8 7 4
♦ A 10 7
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
4 ♠ |
4 NT |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥2
Your auction is now game forcing, so you do not need to jump to four spades. Make a simple raise of spades, planning to cuebid at your next turn if partner shows slam interest. It would be nice to be able to cuebid directly, but a jump to four diamonds would sound like short diamonds in a spade raise.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9
♥ J 8 7 4
♦ A 10 7
♣ K 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 30th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
A few steps back is sometimes needed to find clarity in the confusion.
April Mae Monterrosa
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 7 3
♥ A 7
♦ J 8 5
♣ A K 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ K 9 8 3 2
♦ 10 7 3
♣ 5 4 3 |
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ J 10 6
♦ A
♣ Q J 10 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ Q 5 4
♦ K Q 9 6 4 2
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣3
Your partner’s double shows the unbid suit, hearts, and values. Even though everybody is bidding, it feels right to cuebid two spades, looking for a redsuit game. If you jumped to three hearts directly, that would sound like four trumps. Delayed support for hearts ought therefore to suggest three trump and a good hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q
♥ Q 5 4
♦ K Q 9 6 4 2
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When you are winning a war almost everything that happens can be claimed to be right and wise.
Winston Churchill
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8
♥ K Q 2
♦ 9 6 2
♣ A 9 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 3
♥ A J 9 6 5
♦ 3
♣ K J 6 2 |
♠ J 7 6 5 2
♥ 8
♦ Q J 8 7 5
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 10 7 4 3
♦ A K 10 4
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♦* |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Dbl. |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Two plus cards, 11+ HCP
♥6
Having transferred into spades, I play that you cannot now raise to four spades (that would be a slam try, since if you just wanted to play game you would transfer initially at the four-level, a Texas Transfer). And since four diamonds now would be a natural slam try, you should bid three no-trump to offer a choice of games. Heart stoppers are for children…
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 6 5 2
♥ 8
♦ Q J 8 7 5
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 14th, 2016
There’s no second chance on stage, and I was trained to make the most of my first chance.
Kate Smith
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ K 8 7 3
♦ 10 7
♣ A K J 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 5
♥ A 9 6 5
♦ A J 9 3 2
♣ 4 |
♠ A 9 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ 8 5
♣ Q 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 7 3
♥ Q J 4
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥* |
1 ♠** |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Spades
**Take-out of spades
♦3
While the meaning of a double here is a matter for partnership agreement, I believe it is best to play it as take-out not penalty. This is because you are more likely to be short not long in clubs here. Double suggests a singleton (with any range) or a doubleton, in which case you would rate to have some extras. So I would double here. Responder’s double, were you to pass, would just show extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 7 3
♥ Q J 4
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
What makes a problem a problem is not that a large amount of search is required for its solution, but that a large amount would be required if a requisite level of intelligence were not applied.
Allen Newell
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q J 10 9 8 7
♥ Q
♦ 8 4
♣ 8 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4 3
♥ 10 5 4 3
♦ 10 9 6
♣ A K J |
♠ A
♥ 9 8 7 6
♦ K J 7 3
♣ 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 6 2
♥ A K J 2
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♣K
In competitive auctions, jumps to the five-level tend to be focused on one of two things: the need for either a control in the danger suit, or good trumps. Here there is no space, and my guess without detailed discussion would be that my partner might first cuebid four spades then bid five hearts with a spade control. So I’ll pass, despite my good trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 2
♥ A K J 2
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
3 ♠ |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?
Josef Stalin
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 6 5
♥ A 9 3
♦ 9 8 2
♣ J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 2
♥ J 10 8 6 2
♦ K 10 7
♣ K Q 7 |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 7 4
♦ Q 6 5 4
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 7
♥ K Q 5
♦ A J 3
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
Your partner rates to have diamond length, so it is tempting to lead that suit. The alternative is to kill ruffs in dummy by leading a trump, but I’d be worried about picking up the trump suit for declarer. My first choice is a small diamond, my second a small heart. But underleading an ace smacks of desperation, and I’m not sure it is appropriate yet.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ A 5 4 2
♦ J 9 5 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Holding ♠ A-7-3, ♥ Q-10-9-6-2, ♦ 7-5-2, ♣ K-4, I heard my partner open one club and the next hand bid one spade. What approach would you recommend now, and would your action be different as a passed hand?
Fair Competition, Boca Raton, Fla.
As a passed hand you’d bid two hearts, since your initial pass has effectively limited your hand. But as an unpassed hand, you are not worth committing the hand to the two-level; so what else can you do? You must bid, so a negative double looks less misleading than an overcall of one notrump. Switch the red suits and I’d advocate bidding one no-trump, since losing diamonds is far less critical than losing hearts.
If you held ♠ A-Q-10-3-2, ♥ 4, ♦ Q-J-10-8, ♣ A-J-3, and heard a weak no-trump to your left, and four hearts to your right, would you act? I can see how passing, doubling, or bidding four spades might all work. If you prefer to pass, how much more would you need to act?
Needing More, Staten Island, N.Y.
My vote goes for the bid of four spades. The real reason for acting with such a marginal hand is the practical one that the jump to four hearts is very wide-ranging. Even when my LHO might want to double me for penalties, he will not know if his partner’s action is purely based on shape, or on some high-cards too. They made you guess; return the favor!
Against your opponent’s one notrump opening, do you prefer to be able to bid with a single-suited or two-suited hand? How does your approach vary depending on vulnerability, and would you recommend a different approach in balancing seat to direct seat?
Controlled Aggression, San Antonio, Texas
|
In direct seat you’d want to bid with shape rather than just high cards, and you need to be able to act with all major-based hands, be they one- or two-suited. In balancing seat, when non-vulnerable, or when a passed hand, you have more flexibility to act, as partner is less likely to hang you. Bidding makes especially good sense when you know that if you don’t, partner is likely to lead your singleton or void.
At a recent STAC Pairs game, I was at favorable vulnerability in second seat. I held ♠ A-8-4, ♥ 10-9-8-7-6-4, ♦ J, ♣ A-5-3. Would you preempt if your RHO passed, and would you overcall if your RHO opened one spade?
Drawing the Line, Corpus Christi, Texas
I would not preempt in second seat at any vulnerability. My hand is too strong defensively, and too playable in three suits for this to be a good idea. Overcalling two hearts over one spade when non-vulnerable would not disconcert me unduly. Partner is unlikely to be on lead to the final contract, and I am trying to get in my opponents’ way.
I held ♠ K-Q-10-8-7-6, ♥ J-6, ♦ 7, ♣ 8-5-3-2, and defended three clubs after my partner had overcalled one diamond over one club. Declarer had subsequently shown long clubs and extra values, and I had bid spades. My partner led king then ace of diamonds, dummy putting down a 3-4-3-3 pattern with the spade ace and club queen. If I choose to discard a heart, would you recommend the jack or the six – and why?
Hot Cross Bunny, Bellevue, Wash.
Partner should not have the diamond queen or he would lead it at trick two. I’d discard the heart jack, hoping that partner will work out to give me a heart ruff if he has the ace and that he will play on spades if he does not. I realize my partner might lead away from the heart king, hoping I have an original holding of ace-jack-third; I’ll take the risk.
|
|
Zia Mahmood famously contributed a BOLS Bridge Tip entitled ‘When they don’t cover, they don’t have it’, Curiously though, he failed to use his own good advice on this deal from the 2010 Philadelphia world championships. Plan the play in three notrump on the lead of the diamond five. You play dummy’s ace and East encourages with the jack.
A simple analysis is that you have eight top winners and need one of the spade or heart finesses. But if you pick the wrong suit, the defenders will surely run the diamonds against you. If you trust your opponents to make helpful discards, you should run the clubs and see which if the major suits your LHO appears to be guarding.
(For the record, in situations of this sort, you should delay asking what discards your opponents play until they have both let go a card. There is no reason to tip them off if their discards might affect your play – they are more likely to be honest if they think you don’t care!)
But let’s assume you are playing against competent opponents, who may gauge the position and try to disguise their holdings in the majors.
How about winning the opening lead and advancing dummy’s spade jack? It may be very hard for East to follow low without a flicker – if he has the king and doesn’t cover he could easily have presented you with an unmakeable contract.
If East plays low without apparent discomfort, rise with the ace and later finesse against the heart king.