November 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, November 13th, 2016
|
I held: ♠ —, ♥ Q-6-5, ♦ K-J-9-5-4-3 ♣ A-10-7-3 and was in first seat at favorable vulnerability. Was my decision to open two diamonds unreasonable? In a sense my decision worked well, because we stayed low when my partner had a balanced 13-points with five spades. But the club and heart finesses worked, so we could make three no-trump…result, misery.
Affirmative Actor, Laredo, Texas
Preempting looks against the odds to me because of your side defense and playability in three suits. Make the club three the spade three and I concur with your decision. You always want to try to make your opponents guess, if you have a reasonable way in which to apply the pressure, as here. But sometimes you have to weigh up if misrepresenting your own hand is worth the price. Here, I’d say no. I’d open one diamond and apologize later.
There seems to be an ongoing debate as to when to open one no-trump when in range but holding a five-card major. Do you have any simple rules?
Lawmaker, Holland, Mich.
You should almost never open one no-trump with a five-card major and another four-card suit. Additionally, with a five-card major and 17 points plus a five-card major, open your suit and treat the hand as 18-19. With a bad 15 points and a good suit I will occasionally down-value the hand and rebid as if I held 12-14. Otherwise, unless I have two open suits, I think a strong no-trump is most descriptive, or the least lie, with 5-3-3-2 pattern.
My hand from a recent duplicate game was ♠ A, ♥ A-K-Q-J-9-5-3, ♦ K-6-5, ♣ 9-4. I chose to open two clubs but subsequently my opponents thought I should have opened one heart with the intention of jumping after my partner’s response.
House Martin, Westhampton, N.Y.
|
Your hand is on the cusp of a game force – planning to jump to four hearts to show a shapely hand with quick tricks in a long suit but no slam interest. Nothing is perfect, and I’m more flexible with opening two clubs than some. Give me the diamond queen (or the jack on a very good day) and you could sell me on the stronger action.
I held: ♠ 8-3, ♥ K-10-9-7-4, ♦ Q-7, ♣ K-9-8-2 and heard my partner open a strong no-trump. How should I have advanced this hand?
Open Sesame, Spokane, Wash.
I think you could sensibly go in one of two directions. If playing Stayman but not transfers, bid two clubs and follow up with two no-trump unless you find a fit. If you are playing Jacoby transfers, transfer to hearts then invite game with a call of two no-trump. It would be a slight underbid not to make a try for game, since your good heart intermediates offer your partner a decent source of tricks. Without the heart 10, I might transfer to hearts, planning to pass unless partner broke the transfer, to show a real fit for hearts.
I recently held: ♠ K-J, ♥ Q-10-8-5-4, ♦ K-9-8-2, ♣ Q-3. I passed the hand, which worked out well enough since my partner had 12 points and the deal belonged in a part-score. But his comment afterwards was that a 5-4 hand with an easy rebid should probably be opened when non-vulnerable. What do you say?
Action and Re-action, Tucson, Ariz.
With a 5-4 pattern and touching suits I tend to open, unless the hand has severe flaws. On this occasion the combination of the absence of aces, plus the doubleton spade and club honors clearly not pulling their full weight, make passing the normal action to me. Move the club queen into the diamond suit and opening the bidding becomes far more attractive. You have more playing strength when your honors are in your long suits.
|
November 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The last thing one knows in constructing a work is what to put first.
Blaise Pascal
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 8
♥ Q J 4
♦ A Q 7
♣ K 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6 3
♥ 10 9 8
♦ J 8 6 2
♣ Q 3 |
♠ K 10 5
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ K 9 4 3
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ A K 7
♦ 10 5
♣ A J 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♣* |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing club raise
♥10
When you hold a balanced 18-count with a stopper in the opponents’ suit, overcalling one no-trump is always an option. Doubling is possible too, and that might be appropriate if either your hand has been improved by the suit opened to your right or your stopper looks delicate. But here the simple no-trump overcall looks right. You are at the top of the range, I agree, but that is still legal in 35 states.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 8
♥ Q J 4
♦ A Q 7
♣ K 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Deign on the passing world to turn thine eyes, And pause a while from learning to be wise.
Samuel Johnson
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ A Q 9 6 2
♦ A 5 3
♣ 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 5 4 3
♥ 10 4
♦ J 7 4
♣ 9 7 4 |
♠ 7 2
♥ J 7 5 3
♦ Q 10 9
♣ Q J 10 8 |
| South |
♠ K J 9
♥ K 8
♦ K 8 6 2
♣ A K 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
In general, there is a simple rule as to how to invite game with a balanced 10-count facing a 12-14 hand. This is akin to (the humorous magazine) Punch’s advice to a young man about to get married. “Don’t!”. One could similarly argue that no balanced 10-count is really worth an invitation. With a maximum of 24 HCP and no great source of tricks, passing is the disciplined action here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6
♥ A Q 10 6 2
♦ A 5 3
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A man who does not think and plan long ahead will find trouble right at his door.
Confucius
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 7 6 3
♥ 8 7 5
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 9 5 4
♥ 9 4
♦ 10 9 8 2
♣ J 9 |
♠ J 8 2
♥ 10 6 2
♦ J 6 5
♣ K 10 8 5 |
| South |
♠ Q
♥ A K Q J 3
♦ A K 3
♣ A Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
One of the subjects I am frequently preaching is that two-level overcalls should be kept up to strength. So in responding to such an overcall, one should trust partner to have what he has promised. This does not feel like a four diamond raise, so I would simply bid three diamonds and would like more shape than this for a jump raise. Had partner overcalled in clubs I might jump to four clubs, though.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8
♥ 10 6 2
♦ J 6 5 4
♣ K 10 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Though we travel the world over to find the beautiful we must carry it with us or we find it not.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 6 2
♥ K 9 8 4
♦ A 9
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10 5 4
♥ 5
♦ K 6 5
♣ Q 9 6 2 |
♠ K 9 8 7 3
♥ J 10
♦ J 7 4 2
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A Q 7 6 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 3
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠* |
4 ♠ |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Limit raise or better in hearts
♠A
If I were a passed hand I would treat this hand as a limit raise by cuebidding two clubs (if you wanted to agree that two hearts was also a raise by a passed hand you might do so, I suppose). As an unpassed hand, though, I would simply raise to two spades. My defensive length in the opponents’ likely trump suits does not make me want to encourage partner to bid on with a marginal hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 2
♥ K 9 8 4
♦ A 9
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
…Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one’s own safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind.
Joseph Heller
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 7 3
♥ Q 10
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 5 2
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ Q 4 2
♣ 9 7 |
♠ A J 4
♥ 7 4 3 2
♦ A K 3
♣ 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Your hand seems just a little too good to pass here, and if you are going to keep the auction open, what call is best and most flexible? I think doubling here for takeout is the best way to get all suits into play. After all, how do you protect against partner having a doubleton club? We’ve all done worse – I think.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 3
♥ K 10
♦ J 7 5
♣ K J 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
A trap is only a trap if you don’t know about it. If you know about it, it’s a challenge.
China Mieville
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ Q 2
♦ K 8 6 5
♣ Q 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8
♥ K 10
♦ J 7
♣ 10 9 8 7 6 2 |
♠ Q 7
♥ A J 8 7 4
♦ Q 10 9 4 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ K 5 4 2
♥ 9 6 5 3
♦ A 3
♣ A K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
Your partner’s failure to overcall suggests no great holding in either diamonds or spades. Does that mean you should go passive with a trump or club lead? I suppose that is possible, but my instinct is to lead diamonds, hoping to get the suit going on defense, perhaps in order to try to establish additional trump tricks for your side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ Q 6 2
♣ 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
November 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I dealt and passed holding: ♠ A-J-5-4-2, ♥ Q-9-4-3-2, ♦ Q-3, ♣ 10. When my partner opened one club I bid one spade and heard my partner respond one no-trump. Would it be right to rebid two hearts or three hearts now?
Rose Red, Pleasanton, Calif.
It is surely sufficient to bid two hearts here. If you do not have a nine-card fit, your hand will not be nearly as promising as it might initially appear. If your partner raises hearts you will bid on of course. However, that will probably not happen, I admit, since your sequence is not technically a constructive one.
I was in third seat with: ♠ J-4, ♥ Q-J-7-2, ♦ K-Q-5-4-3, ♣ 10-4 and heard my partner open one diamond. I responded one heart, the next hand doubled, and partner raised to two hearts, with my RHO now bidding two spades. What would you do now?
Raising the Roof, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Without the opponents bidding, three diamonds should be natural and forcing, at least invitational in hearts. You cannot agree one suit then switch to another suit to correct the partscore; this should be a game try. In competition, I might bid three diamonds intending it to be natural, to help partner locate my values, not minding if partner read this to be a slightly better hand.
Recently in your column I have seen experts bidding weak twos on any six-carder, without reference to suit quality, or indeed even on a five-card suit. Does that mean that I should be considering doing the same thing at my club?
Class Clown, Troy, N.Y.
|
I’d say no. It is important that a partnership preserves some kind of integrity in its standards of preempting. While one can afford to move away from the view that weak-twos require two of the top honors, when you are vulnerable I believe there is a place for discipline — except perhaps in third chair.
I was watching a major championship when I saw two world class players pass over a one club opener, when holding a strong three-suiter with a singleton spade. How good does one have to be to consider action mandatory in this position?
Tom Terrific, Levittown, Pa.
I hate doubling an opening bid with off-shape hands, unless holding at least 17 HCP, the same reaction as the two players who held the hand. After partner bids spades you have to bid no-trump, suggesting 18-20, so you would be misrepresenting your hand by quite a bit to follow this route with less than 17. And it is hard to know how hard to bid on when partner jumps to four spades…
I have a great deal of problems determining whether to lead actively or passively when playing pairs. What determines when to try not to give away a trick, as opposed to leading from honors? Does it depend on the form of scoring, and what about defending to games or slams as opposed to partscores?
Problem Solver, Edmonton, Alberta
Your question is somewhat open-ended. I lead aggressively against small slams and against games, unless it sounds as if suits are not splitting or the opponents are stretching, or if I am leading into a strong hand. Against part-scores I’m less dogmatic. Other than a dislike of leading from ace-fourth (or low from ace-king fourth) at notrump, I have few hard and fast rules.
|
November 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
She should have died hereafter.
William Shakespeare
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ A 5
♦ A J
♣ A Q 10 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 5
♥ J 10 9 4
♦ 9 5 4 3
♣ 8 6 |
♠ 3 2
♥ K 7 6 2
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 6
♥ Q 8 3
♦ K 6 2
♣ J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*12-14
♥J
The phrase “It goes without saying” is almost redundant, especially at bridge. Here it almost goes without saying that when you have game-forcing values facing an opening bid, you should normally respond in your longest suit. Exceptions come when your second-suit is a major and of much better quality than your minor. That is emphatically not so here, so bid two clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ A 5
♦ A J
♣ A Q 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Take short views, hope for the best, and trust in God.
Sydney Smith
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K J 10 5 3
♣ A Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 8 6 2
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ A 6
♣ 8 4 |
♠ J 9 3
♥ A 7 3
♦ 9 8 7
♣ 10 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 5
♥ K Q J
♦ Q 4 2
♣ K J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
It would not be wrong to show a good high-card raise in clubs with a cuebid of two hearts. The problem is that if partner fits diamonds, both sides could be making vast numbers of tricks – and how is partner to know that? If you trust your partner to be a sound overcaller, you might jump to three diamonds, a fit jump showing good diamonds and a raise to four clubs or more.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K J 10 5 3
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
While three no-trump is the comfortable game contract here, both tables in a team game played in clubs after an invertedminor response. One pair overbid to slam, and with the spade and diamond finesses both losing, declarer could not avoid going two down when he played to make his contract.
He was hoping that declarer in the other room might similarly overreach. However, on the auction shown in the diagram South was favored with a heart lead against five clubs, rather than the more challenging spade lead, and found himself in with a fighting chance. He won the lead in hand with the king and played the club ace-king. Now after cashing the heart queen and heart ace, he led an innocent low diamond from hand, planning to run it if this were not covered.
However when West put in the eight, declarer tried the queen, and East won his king to play back a low diamond to the 10, jack and ace. Now came the diamond seven, and this time East was forced to cover with the nine, and declarer discarded a spade from hand.
East was now on play, and whether he returned a spade into the tenace or exited with a diamond or heart for the ruff-sluff, declarer would have the rest. Declarer’s line of play virtually ensured the contract unless the diamond spot-cards were extremely unfavorably located from his perspective. And at the very worst South could always have fallen back on the spade finesse.