September 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 21st, 2016
|
Can you comment on the merits of support doubles – to show three-card support for partner? It seems to me that in competitive auction the double lets partner judge more precisely what level to compete to than would be the case without competition, when a raise could be based on only three trump.
Upping the Stakes, Salinas, Calif.
Support doubles eliminate judgment – but to me, some hands with three trump are not worth a raise, while some unbalanced hands with three trump look more like they have four trump in them. And these doubles also provide a blue-print for the opponents. A compromise position would be to follow the French style of using the double to show three trumps, plus extras of one sort or another.
My partnership had a defensive problem where partner led from A-K-J-7-4 in a suit he had bid and I had not raised. I held 9-6-3-2 and did not know whether to risk an echo, or if that would mislead my partner. Would the signal vary depending on whether dummy had a doubleton or queen-third?
Signal Failure, Selma, Ala.
Here’s my view – it may not be standard but it is coherent and consistent. When you don’t want partner to shift, play the six or three at your first turn, followed by a higher card after partner continues the suit. If dummy has queen-third you should have the firm partnership agreement to play third highest from four. Thus partner has a good chance to work out when you have two, not four. Equally, if he sees you play the very smallest card, he knows you have three not four.
Do you have any recommendations for CDs on bridge that might help me master the tricks of the trade?
Rom-Com Fan, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
The BridgeTrix series that I wrote are pretty good! And my erstwhile partner Bob Hamman has produced Bridge at the Top, which I enjoyed a lot. Larry Cohen’s CD’s on learning bridge are also excellent.
I found a recent letter about playing bridge for the first time in 40 years very interesting for two reasons. I have also found the game to be far more dependent on system not judgment. Can players survive in the modern game without detailed partnership agreements of the sort you sometimes show in your columns?
Conventional Weapons, Rockford, Ill.
I sometimes wonder if I should simplify the complex auctions expert have – but for the most part since the focus is on the play, I leave the auctions in place. A small percentage of deals are won and lost in the bidding, but on most deals the critical issue is the play. Knowing simple methods is far more important than playing complex methods you aren’t confident of.
When your partner overcalls, and the next hand makes a negative double, how should you play a redouble? Is this best used as highcards, a top honor in partner’s suit, or some other combination of suits or values?
Blue Blood, Midland, Mich.
Georg Rosenkranz (who was born 100 years ago this month!) proposed the redouble should show a top honor in partner’s suit. Not a bad idea, but I prefer to use the call as announcing ownership of the deal – so, typically, better than a 10-count, probably not with much in the way of fit for partner.
|
September 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Measuring Safety Performance by the number of injuries you have is like measuring parenting by the number of smacks you give.
Dr. Robert Long
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K Q 8 3 2
♥ 7
♦ A J 7
♣ Q 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ Q 8 3
♦ 8 6 5 2
♣ J 4 |
♠ —
♥ K J 9 6 5
♦ K 10 4
♣ K 10 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A 9 5 4
♥ A 10 4 2
♦ Q 9 3
♣ A 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♥** |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*14-16
**Spades
♦5
When the opponents preempt after an opening and response, opener can be put under great pressure, since he won’t have room to show all possible hands. His double here is typically extra values, unable to raise partner, bid no-trump, bid a new suit or rebid one’s own suit. You too have a good hand. I’d guess it was right to bid four spades now, implicitly agreeing clubs and promising a spade control.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ K J 9 6 5
♦ K 10 4
♣ K 10 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Take nothing on its looks; take everything on evidence. There’s no better rule.
Charles Dickens
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 10
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ K 10 6
♣ A 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ Q J 5 4 2
♣ J 3 |
♠ 8 6 4
♥ Q 5 2
♦ 9 8 7
♣ K Q 10 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 7 2
♥ A 6
♦ A 3
♣ 9 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
Depending on which textbook you read, this is a textbook example of a responsive – some call it Snapdragon or even competitive — double. When your partner overcalls, there are virtually no positions where advancer (his partner) can double for penalty. Doubles show the unbid suit(s); this hand is dead minimum in high cards, but it is definitely the best and safest way into the auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ Q J 5 4 2
♣ J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Earn well the thrifty months, nor wed Raw Haste, half-sister to Delay.
Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 4 3
♥ K Q 2
♦ 8 2
♣ Q 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ 9 8 3
♦ K 6 5 4
♣ J 10 9 2 |
♠ J 6
♥ A 10 7 4
♦ Q 10 9 7 3
♣ K 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 7 5
♥ J 6 5
♦ A J
♣ A 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♣J
Did you jump blindly to three no-trump? If so, you are indirectly telling your partner you know better than he what is in his hand. Use the fourth suit and bid two hearts, to set up a game force, then raise clubs at the three-level. You can always get back to three no-trump, but if you bid three no-trump directly you may miss a cold club slam opposite a minimum hand with nothing but a little extra shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 4 3
♥ K Q 2
♦ 8 2
♣ Q 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 31st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Forethought we may have, undoubtedly, but not foresight.
Napoleon Bonaparte
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 6
♥ 9 5 3
♦ A 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ A 8 7 6
♦ 2
♣ 10 8 3 2 |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ 4
♦ K Q J 10 5
♣ A J 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K 4 3
♥ K Q J 10 2
♦ 9 6
♣ K 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦2
Some textbooks tell you to redouble with all strong hands, with suit bids being limited. Not so: while new suits at the two-level can be played as non-forcing, you should always bid naturally unless you want to defend at least two of the unbid suits. In such a case, redouble would make sense. Here it looks right to show your long suit first. Bid one diamond, a forcing call, planning to reveal your strength later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 6
♥ 9 5 3
♦ A 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 30th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The Beautiful arises from the perceived harmony of an object, whether sight or sound, with the inborn constitutive rules of the judgment and imagination: it is always intuitive.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 7 4 2
♥ K
♦ A 9 7 5 4
♣ A 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 8
♥ J 10 4
♦ 3
♣ K Q J 8 5 2 |
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ Q 9 8 7 5 3
♦ 8
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K 5
♥ A 6 2
♦ K Q J 10 6 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
It looks obvious to bid three no-trump, but I prefer temporizing with three hearts, suggesting a single stopper. You can maneuver to make partner declarer if he has a stopper such as the queen, while avoiding playing no-trump if he has heart shortage. Your hand is very suitable for play in both spades and diamonds, after all.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ A 6 2
♦ K Q J 10 6 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
It is better to remain silent than to speak the truth illhumoredly, and spoil an excellent dish by covering it with bad sauce.
St. Francis de Sales
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ Q 5 2
♦ 8 6 4 3
♣ K 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ J 9 7 6 3
♦ K Q J 10
♣ J 9 4 |
♠ J 10 9 6
♥ 4
♦ 9 7 5 2
♣ 10 7 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 5 2
♥ A K 10 8
♦ A
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
With a choice of four-card majors, which is the better honor to lead from? Imagine partner with a four- or five-card holding in one major or the other; wouldn’t you think it was easier to set up spades than hearts? I would. Conversely, if my spade king were the ace, I might lead a heart, relying on getting in with my side-suit ace, to try to cash out the hearts.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 2
♥ Q 9 7 6
♦ 6
♣ Q 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
If you hear your partner double a one-level opener in the balancing seat, how much do you need to jump in response? Would you make the call on the same hand that you would have facing a direct double – or does it require more (or even less) than facing the direct double?
Catching Up, Galveston, Texas
Since your partner may have less for a balancing double than one in direct seat, I believe a jump shows only short of an opening bid – say 10-12 with a four- or five-card suit. By contrast the range for the jump response facing a direct double might be less, on a hand with the appropriate shape. Incidentally, jumps by passed hands are often four-card suits, since with a five-carder you might already have bid.
I held ♠ K-3, ♥ J-9-5-2, ♦ 10, ♣ Q-8-6-5-4-2, and I heard my partner double one diamond and the next hand pass. Is this a case of bidding majors before minors? What would you recommend I do here?
Picking your Moment, Vancouver, Wash.
I would definitely respond two clubs, expecting the auction to be likely to continue to allow me to bid hearts next. This way I get to show a limited hand with significantly longer clubs and hearts, together with some values, and partner gets to decide where to go next.
Can you give us examples of the sort of situation where you would ever consider employing a tactical or psychic bid and the type of hand you would hold for such an action?
Robert the Bruce, Union City, Tenn.
|
Even though I have psyched perhaps only forty or fifty times in my life, just a few days ago I was playing matchpoints with my wife Judy. She, as dealer, at favorable vulnerability, opened three clubs, followed by a pass from my RHO. I held a 2-3-4-4 nine-count with the ace-king of clubs and tried three no-trump. This went down seven while the opponents could make a heart slam! Bridge sensibly has very strict rules against partnerships colluding to psyche, but the occasional spot of frivolity is hardly unreasonable.
Could you comment on precisely when a double of a no-trump call might be for takeout, not penalty?
Wielding the Axe, Doylestown, Pa.
If in fourth seat you hear your RHO respond one notrump to an opening bid, a double can best be played as takeout of your LHO’s suit. The same philosophy applies when partner has overcalled on this same auction. And as opener if LHO overcalls your opening, and RHO responds one no-trump, double by you should again be takeout of LHO’s suit.
What are the best web sites to follow the news about tournaments wins, and the scandals about cheating?
Little Miss Muffett, Janesville, Wis.
There is no contest here. Bridge Winners broke most of the best stories about the cheating, and has stayed ahead of the curve with fascinating articles by a number of world experts on the subject. It has a lot of other interesting stories and problems, too.
|
August 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
To expect the unexpected shows a thoroughly modern intellect.
Oscar Wilde
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K Q 8 6 4 2
♥ A J 3
♦ 4
♣ 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 5
♥ K Q 7 5
♦ 7
♣ Q J 10 6 3 |
♠ 10
♥ 10 8 6 4
♦ A Q 9 6 5 2
♣ K 8 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ 9 2
♦ K J 10 8 3
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
4 ♥** |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Weak
**Texas transfer
♦7
It is a subtle point that a call of two spades, which I recommend here, should be constructive, not simply weak – whereas if your partner had rebid two clubs, that inference would not be available. The point is that with a weak hand and no diamond fit you can pass two diamonds here, confident that diamonds will be playable facing shortage; that safety does not exist facing a two-club rebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 6 4 2
♥ A J 3
♦ 4
♣ 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
All we know is infinitely less than all that still remains unknown.
William Harvey
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 6
♥ 10 6
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ A J 10 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ J 9 8 5 3
♦ J 7
♣ K 9 4 |
♠ Q 4 3 2
♥ Q 2
♦ 9 8 6
♣ Q 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 9 7
♥ A K 7 4
♦ K Q 5 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦* |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣** |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All Pass |
|
|
*Forcing relay
**0/3 keycards
♣4
A few (too many in my opinion) people still open one diamond with this pattern in the minors. I could grudging accept that would not be entirely unreasonable with this precise shape and a very good four-card diamond suit plus weak clubs. But generally I prefer to open one club and rebid at no-trump (or raise a major with three trumps).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6
♥ 10 6
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ A J 10 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The first round of the 2016 Vanderbilt Knockout Teams produced an intriguing example of the unsafety play.
You declare four spades on a low diamond lead, after an artificial auction has made South declarer. You might reject the finesse at trick one, I suppose. But you don’t. The diamond goes to the 10 and your queen. With overtricks on the horizon it would be easy to relax – but don’t!
At the table, declarer carefully cashed the spade ace to guard against a 4-0 trump break, Success! West had all four missing spades. A spade to the 10 and queen was followed by a club to the ace and another club to the queen.
East won the club king and got out with a heart to South’s ace. A heart ruff was followed by a club ruff by South. Disaster! West overruffed and exited in hearts.
Now, even if the diamond finesse was working, declarer couldn’t take it. But imagine the diamond finesse is wrong, the spades are 4-0, the clubs 5-2 offside. You are still cold!
Win the diamond queen, cash the spade king to find the bad news (the “safety” unsafety play). Then play the club ace and another club to the queen and king. Win the heart return, cross to the diamond ace and ruff a club with the spade nine.
West overruffs and the defense have a diamond to cash, but they can’t stop you ruffing a club with the spade ace, then finessing in trumps for 10 tricks.