|
You recently raised the issue of the many names given to various modern doubles. Isn’t the first requirement to agree when Penalty Doubles apply? Beyond that, any double that is not a conventional alertable call, should not even need a name — partner can simply work out what it must mean in the context of the auction.
Monkee Mike, Fayetteville, N.C.
Up to a point, I agree. But some doubles (Snapdragon doubles to show the fourth suit) may be counter-intuitive, so do require detailed agreement. Even the simple responsive double isn’t entirely straightforward. A relatively modern expression of “you’ll recognize it when you hear it” is otherwise not too far from the truth.
I was reading about the ‘Vanderbilt Trophy’ recently. Was the donor connected to the Commodore of the same name?
Lost Louis, Springfield, Mass.
Harold Vanderbilt was a famous bridge player, and a great grandson of the Commodore. He devised and codified the rules of bridge, 100 years ago, and presented the trophy that bears his name as well as playing the game at the top level. He lived to a ripe old age and died less than 50 years ago.
When partner sets up a game force with the fourth suit, which takes precedence, raising partner or bidding no-trump? when I held ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2 I opened one club and responded one spade to my partner’s one diamond call. Now he bid two hearts, and I wasn’t sure what to focus on next.
Pigling Bland, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
First things first: I might have bid one no-trump at my second turn, knowing partner either didn’t have spades or would bid them at his next turn. That said, I’d definitely bid two notrump next. Diamonds can wait, and when in doubt the more economical action leaves more room to explore.
|
Where do you stand on the appropriate number of cards to hold when preempting? I’m often torn between a three-level action on a six-card suit, or even the occasional five-card weak two in third seat. If you feel the same urges, when if ever do you give in to them?
Cave Man, Dodge City, Kan.
For sure a three-club opener may be six (since you have no other preempt available). Hands with high offence and low defense (say, a suit of KQJxxx especially when accompanied by some side-suit shape) might more closely resemble a three-level preempt than a two-level action. The same occasionally applies to a five-card two-level preempt; but they are the exception.
I wasn’t sure how to advance this hand from a recent duplicate pairs tournament at our club. I responded one no-trump to one spade, and when my partner bid two hearts I gave preference to two spades with ♠ J-4, ♥ K-8, ♦ A-5-3-2, ♣ Q-10-5-3-2. Now my partner bid three hearts and I thought I had to go to game but wasn’t sure whether to pick spades hearts or no-trump. What would you recommend?
Direction Finder, Albuquerque, N.M.
Since you are clearly not in a game-forcing auction you can bid four of a minor to get partner to pick a game if you think that appropriate and partner would understand this. I suppose your partner could technically be 6-5 either way round, but I imagine if he had a strong hand with 5-6 in the majors he would have opened one heart, planning to reverse into spades. So my best guess would be to bid four spades now rather than three no-trump.
|
In the Bermuda Bowl qualifying match between Australia and Poland the two declarers reached quite different contracts – and with differing results.
In one room, as North Nye Griffiths overcalled three spades over three hearts and Liam Milne drove him to slam. Griffiths won the club king lead with the ace and led a spade to his ace then took the diamond finesse. When the diamond queen scored he left the spade king in dummy, instead playing the diamond ace, pitching a club. Now he led a third diamond, ruffed and over-ruffed, and East had a club to cash for down one.
For Poland, Jacek Kalita passed over three hearts, and Michal Nowosadzki as South ended in five diamonds. Nowosadzki won the heart ace and led a diamond to the queen followed by two more rounds of diamonds. West won the third diamond and returned the club nine, overtaken by East with the 10, which Nowosadzki ducked — to rectify the count for a possible squeeze.
When East switched to the spade queen Nowosadzki accurately won the spade king and ran the diamonds, coming down to the bare spade ace and jackdoubleton of clubs in dummy, facing two low spades and the bare club ace in hand.
If East discarded a club, declarer would cash the club ace then cross to the spade to cash the club jack. He actually threw a spade, and declarer cashed the spade ace then came back to hand with a club to cash the small spade – a perfect criss-cross squeeze.