October 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
It is more noble to give yourself completely to one individual than to labor diligently for the salvation of the masses.
Dag Hammarskjold
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 10 8 7 5
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 9 7
♣ A 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ K Q 8 5 3
♦ J 4 3
♣ K 9 6 3 |
♠ —
♥ A J 9 7 2
♦ K 8 5
♣ Q 10 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 6 3 2
♥ 4
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
5 ♥ |
5 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥K
An easy one? If playing two over one, you may not have high-card extras, but what you have is suitable for slam. Cuebid your club ace with a call of four clubs, and hope partner can take control. This doesn’t promise real extras, it just suggests a hand prepared to cooperate for slam. If partner was merely inviting game, bid it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 8 7 5
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 9 7
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Nothing contributes so much to tranquilize the mind as a steady purpose – a point on which the soul may fix its intellectual eye.
Mary Shelley
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 10 5
♦ 10 8 6 4
♣ A K 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K J 8 2
♦ K Q J 7 2
♣ 8 4 3 |
♠ 9 8 7 5
♥ 9 7 3
♦ A 5
♣ Q J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 4 2
♥ A Q 6 4
♦ 9 3
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
I would normally lead a doubleton, looking for a ruff, but here my spades are too weak and my club honor potentially too significant for this to feel right. Since my partner is quite likely to have a doubleton heart, I don’t like opening up that suit either, so it is a toss-up between diamonds and spades. I go for the diamond three.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K 10 8 7 2
♦ 10 4 3
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
Both vulnerable, you are in fourth seat holding ♠ J-8-5-2, ♥ Q-J-4, ♦ A-Q-J-7-6, ♣ 5. Your RHO opens one heart. There appeared to be two plausible options: first, a take-out double, seeking a spade fit, planning a rebid of two diamonds over a two club response by your partner — i.e. equal-level conversion. The second choice would be a two-diamond overcall. Where do you stand on this?
Craft Fair, Palm Springs, Calif.
You did not consider an initial pass, which I might well vote for. Certainly a two diamond overcall is preferable to a double – equal-length conversion is all well and good, though I don’t subscribe. But even if I did, I’d need (for example) the heart ace instead of the queen for that.
Playing in a sectional team event, I picked up ♠ K-Q-J-9, ♥ 9-4, ♦ K-Q-7-5-4, ♣ 10-8 and in second seat at favorable vulnerability I elected to open one diamond. Subsequent developments were not to my liking, and my partner indicated my decision was a poor one. What do you think?
Larry the Lamb, Johnstown, Pa.
I would pass most 11-counts with this pattern especially a collection with no aces, but I can see why you would open a hand with good suits and an easy rebid over the likely simple response of one heart. I’d also yield to temptation, I admit it. That said, if you switch the majors, so that your rebid is more awkward over a one spade response, I might pass.
If you were going to travel abroad to play bridge, where would you recommend going?
Travelin’ Man, Raleigh, N.C.
|
The tournaments in France in the summer (especially Cannes and Biarritz) allow you both to play and enjoy life. The Spring Fours in Stratfordon-Avon in May is also a fun and challenging event. But my favorite recent event was the Gold Coast in Brisbane, Australia — a week of fun, bridge, sun and sand.
My partner opened one club and rebid one spade over my one heart call. With ♠ Q-J-8-2, ♥ A-10-3-2, ♦ 5-3, ♣ Q-8-4 would you raise to two spades or three spades? I thought my club fit would be useful enough to take the aggressive position.
Upping the Ante, Elkhart, Ind.
This hand is only worth a simple raise. Partner will be pleased you were restrained if he has the most likely hand-type, a balanced 12-14. But if he has more he rates to take another call anyway, so you will be unlikely to miss a good game. Incidentally, I could understand raising an opening one spade bid to three – partner’s fifth spade makes a big difference.
Playing 2/1, how should responder continue after he responds one no-trump to a major, and his partner raises to two no-trumps? Do Wolff Signoffs apply? What about transfers — or is it best to play natural?
Mercy Me, Bellingham, Wash.
It is reasonable to play three hearts over partner’s original spade opening as forcing, but three of a minor can be passed. Maybe best, if hard to remember, is to play transfers. Transferring into partner’s suit is consistent with a weak raise, but opener can do more than complete the transfer with the right hand. If responder shows an ‘impossible’ suit (spades after having responded one no-trump to one heart) that shows both minors.
|
October 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Little things affect little minds.
Benjamin Disraeli
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 4
♥ 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ 9 6 4 2
♣ 8 7 |
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ K Q
♦ 10 7 5
♣ A Q 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 3
♥ A 7 5 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
This is something of a crap-shoot. It would be right to balance if partner has values, whether he is long in diamonds or not. It is wrong to balance if you let the opponents find a better fit or turn a plus score into a minus. My diamond honors persuade me to pass, but with the heart queen in addition I’d consider overcalling one notrump, showing 11-15 HCP. I’d feel stronger if one or both sides were non-vulnerable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 4
♥ 6 4 3
♦ K J 8
♣ J 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Avoidance is paying forward that which I would be much wiser to pay off.
Craig D. Lounsbrough
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 5
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K 7 5 3
♣ 7 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3 2
♥ 8 7 4 3
♦ J 10 8 4
♣ J 9 |
♠ Q J 9 8 6
♥ 5
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ A 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ A K Q J 10
♦ 2
♣ K Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Where you are playing two over one game forcing, you have enough for a cuebid of four clubs. You have great controls, and plan to bid four hearts if partner cooperates with four diamonds. If you play this sequence is only invitational to game, then you have more than enough to bid four spades, but not enough to cuebid for slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 8 6
♥ 5
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ A 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
It was beautiful and simple as all truly great swindles are.
O. Henry
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 5 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ K 7 2
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7 6 3
♥ 8 5 4
♦ A 8 4
♣ 9 7 |
♠ K 10 4
♥ 7 6 3 2
♦ 9 6 5
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ K J 9
♦ Q J 10 3
♣ J 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
There is no rule against using Stayman on flat hands. But the weaker your major, the less attractive it is. Here a 4-4 or 5-4 heart fit might be right if the diamonds were open; equally, a 4-4 heart fit breaking badly might go down when the no-trump game came home. And Stayman may allow a lead-directing double or reveal declarer’s shape to the defense. So I’d just raise to three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 4
♥ 7 6 3 2
♦ 9 6 5
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Pessimism… is, in brief, playing the sure game… It is the only view of life in which you can never be disappointed.
Thomas Hardy
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ Q 6
♦ Q 10 7 6 4
♣ 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ K J 9 3
♦ A K 8 3
♣ J 10 8 2 |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ 8 7 5 4 2
♦ J 9 5 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 7
♥ A 10
♦ —
♣ A K Q 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Unlike the auction in today’s deal, you cannot raise partner’s suit with only two, and your diamonds are not quite good enough to bid. I’d make a second negative of three clubs, and hope to get my values across later. You can always raise or give preference to hearts at your next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6
♥ Q 6
♦ Q 10 7 6 4
♣ 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Never apologize, mister, it’s a sign of weakness.
John Wayne
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 8 7
♥ 4
♦ 10 6 5
♣ A K Q 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3 2
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ K 7 3
♣ 6 4 3 2 |
♠ 5 4
♥ A K 9 8 6
♦ A J 9 2
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 9 6
♥ 7 5 3
♦ Q 8 4
♣ J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
You may not be able to justify this on high cards alone, but I would certainly feel very sympathetic to a jump to three spades rather than a simple call of two spades. Since you plan to compete to three spades if necessary, and you have a great hand on offence compared to defense, why not use up that extra round of bidding at once?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 8 7
♥ 4
♦ 10 6 5
♣ A K Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 26th, 2016
There is no one giant step that does it. It’s a lot of little steps.
Peter A. Cohen
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 8 5 2
♥ J 8 3
♦ A 2
♣ J 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7
♥ 7 2
♦ K Q 10 8
♣ 10 8 7 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 9 4
♥ 6
♦ 9 7 5 4 3
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
♠ 6 3
♥ A K Q 10 9 5 4
♦ J 6
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
Different experts will give you advice always (or never) to lead doubletons here. I refuse to do so: when as here you have no attractive suits to lead from, look for safe leads, then if there are none, the least offensive lead. Here I think a club is less likely to cost a trick outright within the suit itself than a heart or diamond. Others may disagree; that is what makes horse racing.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3
♥ K 6 4
♦ Q 6
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
October 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
I have a question about the unobstructed sequence of Stayman followed by three of a minor over a two diamond response. My partner and I play this as showing a strong five-card minor with slam potential opposite the no-trump. An expert at our club has been taught that it should be weak and to play. What would you recommend the above sequence be used for?
Watcher in the Night, San Antonio, Texas
You are right, the expert wrong, in my opinion. With a weak hand and 4-5 pattern don’t use Stayman but pass one notrump. With a weak hand and 4-6 pattern, simply transfer to the minor. Remember, the perfect is the enemy of the good.
These days there seem to be unlimited versions of Blackwood. Could you comment on whether my partnership should learn any modifications such as Keycard, Exclusion… or even something else?
Enquiring Mind, Honolulu, Hawaii
Whether you play regular or Keycard Blackwood is up to you. I admit that as the world has moved toward Keycard, my objections to it have lessened somewhat. As to Exclusion: the idea is that an unusual jump when trumps have been set – normally to the five-level or at the four level above the partnership suit – asks for keycards. It shows a void in the jump-suit, hence responder ignores that ace in that suit. Be prepared for at least one disaster if you decide to play it.
Holding ♠ K-J-9-3, ♥ 7, ♦ A-J-8-7-5-2, ♣ J-3, would you open with a weak two bid, or at the one level? Or would you prefer to pass, and back in later?
Open Question, Riverside, Calif.
|
I’d never pass this hand; I like to open hands with good suits. However, I try to avoid a weak-two with a decent four-card major on the side if I can. I accept these two pieces of advice may occasionally conflict, as here. On balance, I’d open one diamond, except perhaps in second seat vulnerable, where my idea of a weaktwo closely resembles a hand of this sort. The playing strength of the hand equates to most opening bids.
Recently I saw a deal where you remarked that the odds of a suit splitting 3-3 were about one in three. Since there are six different lengths each opponent could have, why isn’t the chance closer to one in six?
Counting by Numbers, Naples, Fla.
Not all breaks are equally likely. The closest to a general rule I can give you is: an even number of cards will split evenly about one time in three, those odds going down as more cards are involved. (The most likely break when missing an even number is one away from even – be it 3-1, 4-2, or 5-3). When missing an odd number of cards, the odds are two in three that they split as close to evenly as possible. This percentage declines gradually as the total number of missing cards increases.
What is the cut-off point for the suit quality of an overcall? Holding ♠ Q-7-3, ♥ A-2, ♦ Q-10-9-6-4, ♣ A-10-3, would you overcall one diamond over one club – and how about a call of two diamonds over one heart?
Rumblefish, Bremerton, Wash.
A one-level overcall in a hand this strong is just fine. You should almost never overcall at the two-level on a suit that weak (give yourself the club queen as well and I might feel compelled to bid). But I’d like a six-card suit or a better five-card suit before I make a two-level overcall. Here I would double one heart rather than overcall, since this shape is close enough to the classic three-suiter short in hearts.
|
|
At the Dyspeptics Club East has often disparagingly referred to his task on defense as being like Hercules fighting Cerberus, the three-headed dog. Except in this case he considers the third opposing head to be that of his partner.
After East-West had competed accurately to five hearts, then let North play five spades, one can hardly blame West for leading a top heart rather than a club. East thoughtfully overtook with his ace and shifted to a club to South’s jack and West’s king.
South had little option but to win the ace, draw the trump, then ruff his heart in hand and exit with a club. As it turned out, West could have won the club nine, but he saw no reason to waste such a valuable commodity, and so East was forced to take the trick.
When he exited with a diamond, declarer played low. Now West went from penny-wise to pound-foolish, wasting his jack and letting declarer bring in the diamonds for no loser. Contract made.
No stranger to the world of hostile post-mortems, South expansively informed the world how lucky he had been. Perhaps he was hoping to get a rise out of East – but that player remained curiously silent. Can you see why?
While West’s defense was clearly inferior, if East had counted out the hand he would have given declarer a ruff-sluff after winning the second club, and taken his partner off the hook. Declarer can ruff the third club in either hand, but he will still be left with a diamond loser whatever he does.