September 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 14th, 2016
There’s no second chance on stage, and I was trained to make the most of my first chance.
Kate Smith
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ K 8 7 3
♦ 10 7
♣ A K J 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6 5
♥ A 9 6 5
♦ A J 9 3 2
♣ 4 |
♠ A 9 4 2
♥ 10 2
♦ 8 5
♣ Q 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 7 3
♥ Q J 4
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥* |
1 ♠** |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Spades
**Take-out of spades
♦3
While the meaning of a double here is a matter for partnership agreement, I believe it is best to play it as take-out not penalty. This is because you are more likely to be short not long in clubs here. Double suggests a singleton (with any range) or a doubleton, in which case you would rate to have some extras. So I would double here. Responder’s double, were you to pass, would just show extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 7 3
♥ Q J 4
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
What makes a problem a problem is not that a large amount of search is required for its solution, but that a large amount would be required if a requisite level of intelligence were not applied.
Allen Newell
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q J 10 9 8 7
♥ Q
♦ 8 4
♣ 8 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4 3
♥ 10 5 4 3
♦ 10 9 6
♣ A K J |
♠ A
♥ 9 8 7 6
♦ K J 7 3
♣ 9 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 6 2
♥ A K J 2
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♣K
In competitive auctions, jumps to the five-level tend to be focused on one of two things: the need for either a control in the danger suit, or good trumps. Here there is no space, and my guess without detailed discussion would be that my partner might first cuebid four spades then bid five hearts with a spade control. So I’ll pass, despite my good trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 2
♥ A K J 2
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
3 ♠ |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?
Josef Stalin
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 6 5
♥ A 9 3
♦ 9 8 2
♣ J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 2
♥ J 10 8 6 2
♦ K 10 7
♣ K Q 7 |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 7 4
♦ Q 6 5 4
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 7
♥ K Q 5
♦ A J 3
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
Your partner rates to have diamond length, so it is tempting to lead that suit. The alternative is to kill ruffs in dummy by leading a trump, but I’d be worried about picking up the trump suit for declarer. My first choice is a small diamond, my second a small heart. But underleading an ace smacks of desperation, and I’m not sure it is appropriate yet.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ A 5 4 2
♦ J 9 5 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Holding ♠ A-7-3, ♥ Q-10-9-6-2, ♦ 7-5-2, ♣ K-4, I heard my partner open one club and the next hand bid one spade. What approach would you recommend now, and would your action be different as a passed hand?
Fair Competition, Boca Raton, Fla.
As a passed hand you’d bid two hearts, since your initial pass has effectively limited your hand. But as an unpassed hand, you are not worth committing the hand to the two-level; so what else can you do? You must bid, so a negative double looks less misleading than an overcall of one notrump. Switch the red suits and I’d advocate bidding one no-trump, since losing diamonds is far less critical than losing hearts.
If you held ♠ A-Q-10-3-2, ♥ 4, ♦ Q-J-10-8, ♣ A-J-3, and heard a weak no-trump to your left, and four hearts to your right, would you act? I can see how passing, doubling, or bidding four spades might all work. If you prefer to pass, how much more would you need to act?
Needing More, Staten Island, N.Y.
My vote goes for the bid of four spades. The real reason for acting with such a marginal hand is the practical one that the jump to four hearts is very wide-ranging. Even when my LHO might want to double me for penalties, he will not know if his partner’s action is purely based on shape, or on some high-cards too. They made you guess; return the favor!
Against your opponent’s one notrump opening, do you prefer to be able to bid with a single-suited or two-suited hand? How does your approach vary depending on vulnerability, and would you recommend a different approach in balancing seat to direct seat?
Controlled Aggression, San Antonio, Texas
|
In direct seat you’d want to bid with shape rather than just high cards, and you need to be able to act with all major-based hands, be they one- or two-suited. In balancing seat, when non-vulnerable, or when a passed hand, you have more flexibility to act, as partner is less likely to hang you. Bidding makes especially good sense when you know that if you don’t, partner is likely to lead your singleton or void.
At a recent STAC Pairs game, I was at favorable vulnerability in second seat. I held ♠ A-8-4, ♥ 10-9-8-7-6-4, ♦ J, ♣ A-5-3. Would you preempt if your RHO passed, and would you overcall if your RHO opened one spade?
Drawing the Line, Corpus Christi, Texas
I would not preempt in second seat at any vulnerability. My hand is too strong defensively, and too playable in three suits for this to be a good idea. Overcalling two hearts over one spade when non-vulnerable would not disconcert me unduly. Partner is unlikely to be on lead to the final contract, and I am trying to get in my opponents’ way.
I held ♠ K-Q-10-8-7-6, ♥ J-6, ♦ 7, ♣ 8-5-3-2, and defended three clubs after my partner had overcalled one diamond over one club. Declarer had subsequently shown long clubs and extra values, and I had bid spades. My partner led king then ace of diamonds, dummy putting down a 3-4-3-3 pattern with the spade ace and club queen. If I choose to discard a heart, would you recommend the jack or the six – and why?
Hot Cross Bunny, Bellevue, Wash.
Partner should not have the diamond queen or he would lead it at trick two. I’d discard the heart jack, hoping that partner will work out to give me a heart ruff if he has the ace and that he will play on spades if he does not. I realize my partner might lead away from the heart king, hoping I have an original holding of ace-jack-third; I’ll take the risk.
|
September 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
What sculpture is to a block of marble, education is to the soul.
Joseph Addison
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K
♥ A Q 4
♦ A 9 7 4
♣ A K 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
♥ —
♦ J 10 2
♣ 9 |
♠ 2
♥ 10 8 7 3
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ Q J 10 6 |
| South |
♠ Q J
♥ K J 9 6 5 2
♦ K 3
♣ 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
♠A
Your hand looks too good for a purely competitive three-heart call, even if your spade honors may be wasted. I’d bid three diamonds as a game try for hearts. Were my king in clubs not diamonds I’d try three clubs, which should be a try for game rather than a suggestion of an alternative contract. Once hearts have been agreed, the partnership should not need to look for a different strain.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J
♥ K J 9 6 5 2
♦ K 3
♣ 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 9th, 2016
Plan for what is difficult while it is easy, do what is great while it is small.
Sun Tzu
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ —
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ K 10 8 7 5
♣ K Q J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 9 7 |
♠ K J 10 9 8
♥ 6 3 2
♦ 3 2
♣ 8 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A 6 4 2
♥ A Q J
♦ A Q J 9
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
The spade void is not necessarily a plus factor here, and some of your minorsuit cards may not be pulling their full weight. Nonetheless you can hardly pass two hearts here, so you should raise to three hearts and pass the buck to your partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ K 10 8 7 5
♣ K Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Giving up is always an option, but not always a failure.
Cameron Conaway
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 10 3
♥ 10 5 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 5 2
♥ —
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
♠ Q J 9 4
♥ J 8 7
♦ K J 5
♣ A K J |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K Q 9 6 4 3
♦ A 9 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
It is tempting to bid one spade here, but that should show at least a five-card suit. The best call to show values, at least tolerance for diamonds, and a maximum pass. This double can be referred to as Snapdragon, Competitive, or a Fourth-suit double, but they all mean approximately the same thing.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 3
♥ 10 5 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The creative process is a process of surrender, not control.
Julia Cameron
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 5 3
♥ —
♦ A K Q 9 5 3
♣ J 10 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ A K 10 8 3
♦ 7 6 2
♣ A Q 9 4 |
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ Q J 7 6 2
♦ 8
♣ 8 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7 2
♥ 9 5 4
♦ J 10 4
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
4 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Your partner’s use of the fourth suit sets up a game force, and would have left you with an awkward call had East passed. But after the double you have no clear bid, and an easy way to indicate that is by passing now. That should let your partner bid naturally in support of you or by rebidding his suit. Note: if he redoubles, you will put the dummy down.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ A K 10 8 3
♦ 7 6 2
♣ A Q 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
One should never marry a man who doesn’t own a decent set of scissors.
Gillian Flynn
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ K Q 8 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ Q J 10 9 4
♦ 3
♣ J 7 6 5 |
♠ 5
♥ K 8 7 5
♦ A 10 9 7 4
♣ 10 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 7 4 2
♥ 6 3
♦ Q J 5 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
After the negative double, South has no especially accurate continuation. A call of two clubs strongly suggests six, or an unbalanced hand, and a call in either red suit is obviously unacceptable. So what is left, given that a pass is not on the agenda? The answer: rebid one no-trump, showing a balanced hand. What is a full spade stopper between friends?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ K Q 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Here’s to the few who forgive what you do, and the fewer who don’t even care.
Leonard Cohen
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 4 3
♥ 8 3 2
♦ A K 10
♣ 10 8 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 2
♥ 10
♦ 9 8 5 2
♣ A J 6 3 |
♠ 9 8 7 6 5
♥ Q J 9
♦ J 4 3
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A K 7 6 5 4
♦ Q 7 6
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
In an auction of this sort your best hope to beat the contract looks to be to go passive, hoping the black suits are lying unfavorably for declarer. Here the most passive option looks to be a heart, so I would lead the heart nine, trying to give away as little as possible.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8 3
♥ 9 4 3
♦ A 2
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
The final of the Mind Sports Games in 2012 pitted Poland against Sweden. The Poles might have started as favorites, but Sweden won convincingly, their first ever world title in the open game.
Here is Per-Ola Cullin (a judge in his life outside bridge) at work in the very delicate contract of three no-trump doubled. He might not have enjoyed himself on a club lead, but West quite reasonably started with a low diamond to dummy’s 10.
When declarer led a heart to the queen, West ducked – which was essential —then captured the heart jack at trick three and returned the spade jack – ducked by East. Yes, a club shift or an unlikely overtake of the spade jack by East would have worked better, but neither play was entirely obvious.
Given a reprieve, Cullin made no mistake. He finessed in hearts and cashed the last heart winner, squeezing East. At the table, East pitched a club. Cullin now led a diamond to the king and ace, won the club return to cash the second club, then threw East in with a club to lead spades. That gave him an entry to hand to cash his spade and diamond winner.
Had East kept an additional club winner and pitched a spade on the fourth heart, that would have let West win his diamond ace and exit in clubs. But declarer would have finessed, and after East won the club queen and spade ace he would have had to give dummy or declarer the rest.