September 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Holding ♠ A-7-3, ♥ Q-10-9-6-2, ♦ 7-5-2, ♣ K-4, I heard my partner open one club and the next hand bid one spade. What approach would you recommend now, and would your action be different as a passed hand?
Fair Competition, Boca Raton, Fla.
As a passed hand you’d bid two hearts, since your initial pass has effectively limited your hand. But as an unpassed hand, you are not worth committing the hand to the two-level; so what else can you do? You must bid, so a negative double looks less misleading than an overcall of one notrump. Switch the red suits and I’d advocate bidding one no-trump, since losing diamonds is far less critical than losing hearts.
If you held ♠ A-Q-10-3-2, ♥ 4, ♦ Q-J-10-8, ♣ A-J-3, and heard a weak no-trump to your left, and four hearts to your right, would you act? I can see how passing, doubling, or bidding four spades might all work. If you prefer to pass, how much more would you need to act?
Needing More, Staten Island, N.Y.
My vote goes for the bid of four spades. The real reason for acting with such a marginal hand is the practical one that the jump to four hearts is very wide-ranging. Even when my LHO might want to double me for penalties, he will not know if his partner’s action is purely based on shape, or on some high-cards too. They made you guess; return the favor!
Against your opponent’s one notrump opening, do you prefer to be able to bid with a single-suited or two-suited hand? How does your approach vary depending on vulnerability, and would you recommend a different approach in balancing seat to direct seat?
Controlled Aggression, San Antonio, Texas
|
In direct seat you’d want to bid with shape rather than just high cards, and you need to be able to act with all major-based hands, be they one- or two-suited. In balancing seat, when non-vulnerable, or when a passed hand, you have more flexibility to act, as partner is less likely to hang you. Bidding makes especially good sense when you know that if you don’t, partner is likely to lead your singleton or void.
At a recent STAC Pairs game, I was at favorable vulnerability in second seat. I held ♠ A-8-4, ♥ 10-9-8-7-6-4, ♦ J, ♣ A-5-3. Would you preempt if your RHO passed, and would you overcall if your RHO opened one spade?
Drawing the Line, Corpus Christi, Texas
I would not preempt in second seat at any vulnerability. My hand is too strong defensively, and too playable in three suits for this to be a good idea. Overcalling two hearts over one spade when non-vulnerable would not disconcert me unduly. Partner is unlikely to be on lead to the final contract, and I am trying to get in my opponents’ way.
I held ♠ K-Q-10-8-7-6, ♥ J-6, ♦ 7, ♣ 8-5-3-2, and defended three clubs after my partner had overcalled one diamond over one club. Declarer had subsequently shown long clubs and extra values, and I had bid spades. My partner led king then ace of diamonds, dummy putting down a 3-4-3-3 pattern with the spade ace and club queen. If I choose to discard a heart, would you recommend the jack or the six – and why?
Hot Cross Bunny, Bellevue, Wash.
Partner should not have the diamond queen or he would lead it at trick two. I’d discard the heart jack, hoping that partner will work out to give me a heart ruff if he has the ace and that he will play on spades if he does not. I realize my partner might lead away from the heart king, hoping I have an original holding of ace-jack-third; I’ll take the risk.
|
September 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
What sculpture is to a block of marble, education is to the soul.
Joseph Addison
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K
♥ A Q 4
♦ A 9 7 4
♣ A K 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
♥ —
♦ J 10 2
♣ 9 |
♠ 2
♥ 10 8 7 3
♦ Q 8 6 5
♣ Q J 10 6 |
| South |
♠ Q J
♥ K J 9 6 5 2
♦ K 3
♣ 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
♠A
Your hand looks too good for a purely competitive three-heart call, even if your spade honors may be wasted. I’d bid three diamonds as a game try for hearts. Were my king in clubs not diamonds I’d try three clubs, which should be a try for game rather than a suggestion of an alternative contract. Once hearts have been agreed, the partnership should not need to look for a different strain.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J
♥ K J 9 6 5 2
♦ K 3
♣ 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 9th, 2016
Plan for what is difficult while it is easy, do what is great while it is small.
Sun Tzu
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ —
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ K 10 8 7 5
♣ K Q J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 9 7 |
♠ K J 10 9 8
♥ 6 3 2
♦ 3 2
♣ 8 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A 6 4 2
♥ A Q J
♦ A Q J 9
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
The spade void is not necessarily a plus factor here, and some of your minorsuit cards may not be pulling their full weight. Nonetheless you can hardly pass two hearts here, so you should raise to three hearts and pass the buck to your partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ K 10 8 7 5
♣ K Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Giving up is always an option, but not always a failure.
Cameron Conaway
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 10 3
♥ 10 5 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 5 2
♥ —
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ 10 9 8 6 |
♠ Q J 9 4
♥ J 8 7
♦ K J 5
♣ A K J |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K Q 9 6 4 3
♦ A 9 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
It is tempting to bid one spade here, but that should show at least a five-card suit. The best call to show values, at least tolerance for diamonds, and a maximum pass. This double can be referred to as Snapdragon, Competitive, or a Fourth-suit double, but they all mean approximately the same thing.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 3
♥ 10 5 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The creative process is a process of surrender, not control.
Julia Cameron
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 5 3
♥ —
♦ A K Q 9 5 3
♣ J 10 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ A K 10 8 3
♦ 7 6 2
♣ A Q 9 4 |
♠ J 10 9 8
♥ Q J 7 6 2
♦ 8
♣ 8 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7 2
♥ 9 5 4
♦ J 10 4
♣ K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
4 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Your partner’s use of the fourth suit sets up a game force, and would have left you with an awkward call had East passed. But after the double you have no clear bid, and an easy way to indicate that is by passing now. That should let your partner bid naturally in support of you or by rebidding his suit. Note: if he redoubles, you will put the dummy down.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ A K 10 8 3
♦ 7 6 2
♣ A Q 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
One should never marry a man who doesn’t own a decent set of scissors.
Gillian Flynn
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ K Q 8 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ Q J 10 9 4
♦ 3
♣ J 7 6 5 |
♠ 5
♥ K 8 7 5
♦ A 10 9 7 4
♣ 10 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 7 4 2
♥ 6 3
♦ Q J 5 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
After the negative double, South has no especially accurate continuation. A call of two clubs strongly suggests six, or an unbalanced hand, and a call in either red suit is obviously unacceptable. So what is left, given that a pass is not on the agenda? The answer: rebid one no-trump, showing a balanced hand. What is a full spade stopper between friends?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ K Q 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Here’s to the few who forgive what you do, and the fewer who don’t even care.
Leonard Cohen
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 4 3
♥ 8 3 2
♦ A K 10
♣ 10 8 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 2
♥ 10
♦ 9 8 5 2
♣ A J 6 3 |
♠ 9 8 7 6 5
♥ Q J 9
♦ J 4 3
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A K 7 6 5 4
♦ Q 7 6
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
In an auction of this sort your best hope to beat the contract looks to be to go passive, hoping the black suits are lying unfavorably for declarer. Here the most passive option looks to be a heart, so I would lead the heart nine, trying to give away as little as possible.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 8 3
♥ 9 4 3
♦ A 2
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I have a question about disclosure, specifically about the range for our side’s weak-two bids, and the best way to make sure the opponents know what my partner knows. Our convention card says 5-11, but at favorable vulnerability in first or third seat we will frequently act lighter. Is this a permissible style variation? Should it be alerted or perhaps pre-alerted? How should we mark our card?
Bandersnatch, Cincinnati, Ohio
I appreciate your concern; you are right to think the opponents should be alerted – but not pre-alerted. Many convention cards have a section at the top for very light actions, as well as a space in the area for preempts. Mark those properly and additionally I’d alert the preempt if it is in one of those seats.
You recently ran a deal in which a player heard his LHO open two hearts, over which his partner bid two spades. His RHO raised to three hearts, and this came back to his partner, who doubled. He took this as penalty, and conceded 10 tricks for a zero. You described the second double as cards not penalty – why was this?
Looking Back, Worcester, Mass.
The double of three hearts is for takeout, showing extras. But overcaller doesn’t know, for example, whether advancer has three spades and a weak hand (as was the case here) or short spades with a solid defensive holding in hearts. In other words, the double is for take-out, but doesn’t have to be taken out.
I’m planning to direct my club events with an Arrow-switch or Scrambled Mitchell to get only one winner from the field. In other words, in the last few rounds the North-South pairs will play the East-West cards, and vice versa. Is this a good idea — and if I run one, how many boards need to be switched to achieve a fair result?
Doppelganger, Trenton, N.J.
|
Arrow-switching just the last round will be quite sufficient to get a single winner. The mathematics of the situation are quite complex but I’m assured that this is the normal requirement – indeed a further arrowswitch might actually be counter-effective.
I wonder if you’d care to give us an update on your plans for bridge over the next few years, and what your targets in bridge, personal or otherwise, might be?
Barbie, Claymont, Del.
I travel rather less than I did – but I still play some national events and trials. I still am keen to contribute to keep the standard of ethics around the world as high as possible, and to make sure we encourage good behavior and discourage lapses. Playing with my wife Judy twice a week at the club is now one of my greatest pleasures.
Holding ♠ 8-6-3, ♥ A-Q-4, ♦ Q-2, ♣ K-J-10-6-3, I overcalled two clubs over one diamond. My partner subsequently suggested that a take-out double would be better since I had about an opening and support for all of the other three suits. What is current thinking here?
Surfeit of Lampreys, Grand Forks, N.D.
I believe that when you have a five-card major and limited values you would normally bid the suit rather than double. Perhaps with 4-5 in the majors a case could be made for the double. With an uninspiring five-card minor, double if you have three cards in each major, otherwise pass. This hand could go either way, but the club 10 coupled with the three small spades, persuades me to overcall.
|
September 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
If everything was perfect, you would never learn and you would never grow.
Beyonce Knowles
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 7 4 3
♥ K 8 7 6 3
♦ A 6
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ Q J 9 5 2
♦ 10 9
♣ K Q 10 9 8 2 |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ 10 4
♦ Q J 8 5 4 3 2
♣ J |
| South |
♠ K J 10 6 5
♥ A
♦ K 7
♣ A 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 7 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing spade raise
♣K
A once promising hand has suddenly turned to dust and ashes. The huge misfit suggests that a call of two no-trump is enough. If you do not have a fit, there is no reason to assume your side can make game, unless partner produces extra values. Some people play three hearts here as invitational with both majors; even if you do, I’d prefer better spots in my long suits.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7 4 3
♥ K 8 7 6 3
♦ A 6
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
A billion neutrinos go swimming: one gets wet.
Michael Kamakana
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 10 8 4 3
♥ A 3
♦ K Q
♣ Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7
♥ J 9 8 7
♦ J 10 3
♣ 10 4 3 |
♠ Q
♥ 5 4 2
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ A 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ K Q 10 6
♦ A 9 6 4
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
5 NT** |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*12-14
**Choice of slams
♦J
Whether your partner has four hearts, or three hearts in an unbalanced hand, it seems to me that four hearts rates to be the best game. The point is that if partner has only three hearts he will be short in spades or diamonds, and four hearts may well therefore be a better spot, even in a 4-3 fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 2
♥ K Q 10 6
♦ A 9 6 4
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal North-South were playing that their weak twos when vulnerable in second seat would promise very close to opening values, hence North’s majestic leap to slam after the opponents bounced to four spades.
West tried the effect of the spade ace and another spade, hoping to build a trump trick for his side. Declarer carefully ruffed the second spade with the trump queen, and East, not knowing which minor to discard, correctly underruffed. Then South cashed the heart ace, drew trump, and played a fourth heart, while throwing two clubs from the table.
Since West was marked with nine spades and no hearts, he had four cards in the minors. If the contract was to succeed, declarer knew that he needed East to have sole guard of clubs, so East had to hold at least three cards in that suit, but he would also need to have started life with at least four diamonds.
Declarer now took the fifth trump, reducing to a six-card ending with four diamonds and the club ace-king in dummy, while declarer held three small clubs, the guarded diamond king and a trump. If East pitched a club, declarer would score trick 13 with a small club. So he discarded a diamond, and declarer ruffed out the diamonds, with a club entry to the board to score the last trick with the diamond seven.
The blockage in clubs had prevented him from cashing either minor earlier. Note how much easier the hand would be to play if the club and diamond kings were switched.