September 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I have a question about disclosure, specifically about the range for our side’s weak-two bids, and the best way to make sure the opponents know what my partner knows. Our convention card says 5-11, but at favorable vulnerability in first or third seat we will frequently act lighter. Is this a permissible style variation? Should it be alerted or perhaps pre-alerted? How should we mark our card?
Bandersnatch, Cincinnati, Ohio
I appreciate your concern; you are right to think the opponents should be alerted – but not pre-alerted. Many convention cards have a section at the top for very light actions, as well as a space in the area for preempts. Mark those properly and additionally I’d alert the preempt if it is in one of those seats.
You recently ran a deal in which a player heard his LHO open two hearts, over which his partner bid two spades. His RHO raised to three hearts, and this came back to his partner, who doubled. He took this as penalty, and conceded 10 tricks for a zero. You described the second double as cards not penalty – why was this?
Looking Back, Worcester, Mass.
The double of three hearts is for takeout, showing extras. But overcaller doesn’t know, for example, whether advancer has three spades and a weak hand (as was the case here) or short spades with a solid defensive holding in hearts. In other words, the double is for take-out, but doesn’t have to be taken out.
I’m planning to direct my club events with an Arrow-switch or Scrambled Mitchell to get only one winner from the field. In other words, in the last few rounds the North-South pairs will play the East-West cards, and vice versa. Is this a good idea — and if I run one, how many boards need to be switched to achieve a fair result?
Doppelganger, Trenton, N.J.
|
Arrow-switching just the last round will be quite sufficient to get a single winner. The mathematics of the situation are quite complex but I’m assured that this is the normal requirement – indeed a further arrowswitch might actually be counter-effective.
I wonder if you’d care to give us an update on your plans for bridge over the next few years, and what your targets in bridge, personal or otherwise, might be?
Barbie, Claymont, Del.
I travel rather less than I did – but I still play some national events and trials. I still am keen to contribute to keep the standard of ethics around the world as high as possible, and to make sure we encourage good behavior and discourage lapses. Playing with my wife Judy twice a week at the club is now one of my greatest pleasures.
Holding ♠ 8-6-3, ♥ A-Q-4, ♦ Q-2, ♣ K-J-10-6-3, I overcalled two clubs over one diamond. My partner subsequently suggested that a take-out double would be better since I had about an opening and support for all of the other three suits. What is current thinking here?
Surfeit of Lampreys, Grand Forks, N.D.
I believe that when you have a five-card major and limited values you would normally bid the suit rather than double. Perhaps with 4-5 in the majors a case could be made for the double. With an uninspiring five-card minor, double if you have three cards in each major, otherwise pass. This hand could go either way, but the club 10 coupled with the three small spades, persuades me to overcall.
|
September 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
If everything was perfect, you would never learn and you would never grow.
Beyonce Knowles
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 7 4 3
♥ K 8 7 6 3
♦ A 6
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ Q J 9 5 2
♦ 10 9
♣ K Q 10 9 8 2 |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ 10 4
♦ Q J 8 5 4 3 2
♣ J |
| South |
♠ K J 10 6 5
♥ A
♦ K 7
♣ A 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 7 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing spade raise
♣K
A once promising hand has suddenly turned to dust and ashes. The huge misfit suggests that a call of two no-trump is enough. If you do not have a fit, there is no reason to assume your side can make game, unless partner produces extra values. Some people play three hearts here as invitational with both majors; even if you do, I’d prefer better spots in my long suits.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7 4 3
♥ K 8 7 6 3
♦ A 6
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
A billion neutrinos go swimming: one gets wet.
Michael Kamakana
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 10 8 4 3
♥ A 3
♦ K Q
♣ Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7
♥ J 9 8 7
♦ J 10 3
♣ 10 4 3 |
♠ Q
♥ 5 4 2
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ A 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ K Q 10 6
♦ A 9 6 4
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
5 NT** |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*12-14
**Choice of slams
♦J
Whether your partner has four hearts, or three hearts in an unbalanced hand, it seems to me that four hearts rates to be the best game. The point is that if partner has only three hearts he will be short in spades or diamonds, and four hearts may well therefore be a better spot, even in a 4-3 fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 2
♥ K Q 10 6
♦ A 9 6 4
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Don’t kid about Safety; you may be the goat.
Illinois Steel Company
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 9 8 7
♥ A J 9 3
♦ K Q 6
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 4 2
♥ 5
♦ —
♣ 10 9 8 6 5 3 2 |
♠ K J 3
♥ 7 6 4 2
♦ J 10 7 2
♣ K Q |
| South |
♠ Q
♥ K Q 10 8
♦ A 9 8 5 4 3
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 NT* |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Black suits
♣10
You could bid either red suit, and commit the hand to one suit or the other. But on a bad day partner may have either a doubleton diamond, or just three hearts, so if you do take a unilateral decision you’d better guess well. A better alternative is to bid four no-trump to show a two-suiter, planning to convert five clubs to five diamonds to show the red suits. Then partner takes the final decision.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ K Q 10 8
♦ A 9 8 5 4 3
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
4 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Rome is the city of echoes, the city of illusions, and the city of yearning.
Giotto di Bondone
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 6 4 3
♥ 6 3
♦ Q 7 4
♣ K 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 5 2
♥ J
♦ J
♣ A J 10 9 8 6 3 |
♠ K J 10
♥ 10 7 5
♦ K 10 9 6 2
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ 9
♥ A K Q 9 8 4 2
♦ A 8 5 3
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
The jump to four diamonds is a splinter raise. It shows short diamonds and the values for a raise to game in spades. You have enough to cooperate for slam, and the best way forward is to cuebid five clubs, denying a heart control and suggesting approximately these values. Let partner move on with heart control and a suitable hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6 4 3
♥ 6 3
♦ Q 7 4
♣ K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Evil is easy and has infinite forms.
Blaise Pascal
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 3
♥ A 6
♦ A K 10 8 7 3
♣ 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 8 6 2
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ 4
♣ K 9 5 |
♠ J 9 4
♥ Q 8 4
♦ J 6 5 2
♣ J 10 4 |
| South |
♠ K 7 5
♥ K 10 5 3
♦ Q 9
♣ A Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
Your partner’s pass of one diamond redoubled when ‘under’ as opposed to ‘over’ the trumps, should not suggest playing there. It indicates that he has no clear call, (otherwise he would have acted already) and asks you to run to your cheapest real suit. Bid one heart and take it from there. Contrast this position with where you reopen with a double, where your partner’s pass of a redouble would be to play.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 5
♥ K 10 5 3
♦ Q 9
♣ A Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
There’s nothing like being used to a thing.
Richard Sheridan
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 5
♥ 10 6 5 3
♦ A 7 5 4
♣ Q 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 2
♥ J 4
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ 5 4 |
♠ K 7 4
♥ Q 9 7 2
♦ J 6
♣ K 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ A K 8
♦ K 9 3
♣ A J 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
The question here is whether to lead a diamond, trusting your RHO to have hearts under control, or to lead your long suit. I go for the heart lead – since even if East has the aceking of hearts, a heart lead may still serve to help set this suit up for the defense.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 6 5
♥ Q 8 3 2
♦ 9 8 2
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
I have always played that to respond to partner’s opening bid at the two level, in a new suit, requires at least 10 points or invitational values in high-cards. Last night we played against a very experienced and successful player, who claims you can respond at the two level with six or more points. Has there been a change in recent years on this rule?
Valued Client, Hartford, Conn.
You are right and your expert wrong. Of course 10 points is a moveable feast; some 10-counts are not worth the action, some nine-counts are worth an invitation. It just goes to show we should all use common-sense and not count beans! The fact remains that weaker hands without a fit and a biddable suit at the one level should typically bid one no-trump.
In response to a one no-trump call you recently showed a sequence in which responder bid two spades with only one spade and six clubs. Is this a convention of which I have never heard?
Pat-A-Cake, Cleveland, Ohio
I sometimes forget to alert transfer responses in the column. Two diamond and two heart responses to one no-trump are Jacoby Transfers showing the suit above. And one can similarly use two further calls to show diamonds and clubs. One sensible way is to use two spades for clubs, and three clubs for diamonds, while keeping two no-trump as natural. Responder’s continuations at his next turn are to show shortness, since all good hands with a four-card major and a minor plus forcing values start with Stayman.
At unfavorable vulnerability you hear RHO open a strong no-trump. You hold ♠ J-10-5-4, ♥ K-Q-9-6-4, ♦ Q-2, ♣ 6-2. Your partnership agreements provide for showing either the heart suit, or both majors. Does your hand have enough playing strength to justify acting? If not how much more would you need, and would you favor showing just the five-card heart suit, or showing both majors?
Fire when Ready, Sunbury, Pa.
|
I could imagine balancing over a no-trump if non-vulnerable, so long as I was a passed hand. As it is, though, I’d not bid at this vulnerability unless I had the spade ace instead of the four. And I would definitely act to show both majors when 5-4, no matter what the suit disparity.
Can you comment on the method of defensive signaling defined as ‘obvious shift’? Is it a good idea to use these methods or at least to have them in one’s quiver for possible use?
Asking for the Stars, Bristol, Va.
The idea is that discouraging the opening lead will likely see partner shift to dummy’s obvious weak suit, or the suit that the auction makes most logical. Equally, when you encourage the opening lead (assuming that continuing the attack on that suit won’t cost a trick) you can prevent partner from switching to a suit that you know will cost a trick. I like the approach in moderation – but not as a philosophy of life.
It occurred to me while watching the Masters Golf championship that bridge and golf are often sports that go in pairs. Are there any serious bridge players who are outstanding golfers, and any top golfers who play a decent game of bridge?
Double Duty, Kansas City, Mo.
Jesper Parnevik has some decent bridge skills, and Zia Mahmood is a keen if not proficient golfer. Jeff Meckstroth harbored thoughts of playing golf professionally while at college, though his back might prevent him these days. Norberto Bocchi is also a fine golfer.
|
September 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Somewhere in the world there is an epigram for every dilemma.
Henrik Willem van Loon
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ A 10 8 2
♦ K Q 8 3
♣ K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 5 3
♥ Q 9
♦ 7 2
♣ 10 9 8 4 2 |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ 9 5
♣ J 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ K 7 3
♦ A J 10 6 4
♣ A 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 NT* |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Quantitative
♦7
This sequence should be played as game-forcing with long clubs, suggesting a side four-card major, in this case spades of course. Your partner should have doubt about strain or level, but since you have the other two suits well guarded, and no extra values or real black-suit fit, just bid three no-trump. Let partner go past three no-trump if he wants to, but don’t encourage him to do so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 4
♥ A 10 8 2
♦ K Q 8 3
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I have come too late into a world too old.
Alfred de Musset
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 4 3
♥ A 8 6 2
♦ J 6 2
♣ Q 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 8 5 2
♥ 10 9 4 3
♦ 7 5
♣ 2 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ K Q J 7
♦ K 8 3
♣ K J 8 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ 5
♦ A Q 10 9 4
♣ A 9 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| 2 NT |
4 ♠ |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♠K
Normally with a weak hand and four trump facing an overcall, you should raise to the three level, preemptively. You can cuebid with a high-card limit raise in this seat. But here your balanced hand argues for a simple raise. That should suffice: there is no need to do any more than that, since your hand is so defensive in nature.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4 3
♥ A 8 6 2
♦ J 6 2
♣ Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal was recently voted the best played hand of 2011. Geir Helgemo was at the helm, a man who would be pretty close to the top of most people’s list of world’s best declarers.
After the two-suited overcall South heard his partner show short clubs. He asked for keycards, and North treated his fifth spade as the queen, making it easy for Geir to bid the grand slam.
When West led the club king, East followed with the jack. With the sight of all four hands can you see how Helgemo made his contract?
Helgemo reasoned that West rated to be 5-6, and that he also rated to have two diamonds – since East might have bid an eight-card diamond suit. So he won the club ace, cashed the heart ace, then the diamond king and ace, and the heart king. He next played the spade nine from dummy and ran it!
You might wonder how all this maneuvering was going to benefit him, but watch the magician at work. After a spade to the jack, he now played the spade king, and by virtue of the earlier trump finesse he was now in position to duck or overtake in dummy depending on West’s play. This spectacular maneuver is called an Entry-Shifting Squeeze.
If West had discarded a club, Helgemo would have ducked in dummy, after which he could ruff two clubs, setting up the fifth club in hand. If West had thrown a heart, declarer would have overtaken with the ace and been able to set up the long heart.