July 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The torment of precautions often exceeds the dangers to be avoided. Sometimes it is better to abandon one’s self to destiny.
Napoleon Bonaparte
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 4
♥ Q 3
♦ K 5 2
♣ A J 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 3
♥ A J 9 7 6 2
♦ J 10 3
♣ 8 3 |
♠ 10 9 8 5 2
♥ 10 5
♦ 9 7 6 4
♣ K 5 |
| South |
♠ K 7 6
♥ K 8 4
♦ A Q 8
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥7
In auctions of this sort, assuming you lead from one of your four-card suits, there are no inferences about whether to lead majors or minors. You look at the quality of the two suits, and look for sequences to lead from. But when you don’t have any sequences, look for the suit least likely to cost a trick. Here a diamond is both more likely to set up tricks, and less likely to cost, because of the 10-spot.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 6
♥ J 7 6 2
♦ Q 10 7 6
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
You have said that third and fifth leads are easier to read than fourth best leads. Why? So many of us struggle with this!
Train Spotter, Memphis, Tenn.
When playing fourth highest leads, say your partner leads the two in a bid and supported suit. With the missing cards Q 7 4 at the end of the first trick, your partner could have led from Q-7-4-2, Q-7-2, Q-4-2, or 7-4-2 (unless you’d lead the seven here). Declarer may or may not have another card. But the lead of the two in third and fifth leads marks partner with only three cards, so declarer must have one more card. Third and fifth leads do not always solve the count problem, but they do so more often than not.
A hand in a recent column befuddled me. You have four highcard points with a six-card diamond suit, when partner opened a strong no-trump. My first thought was to pass, but then I decided to let my partner know about my diamond suit. Why did you bid two notrump not two diamonds to do that – I would think I would need seven or eight points for such an action?
Unsuitable, Columbia, S.C.
In the old days (before transfers) a call of two diamonds would have been fine. These days, with transfers in use, we need a way to escape into diamonds, but the call of two diamonds shows hearts. Methods vary here: some play two no-trump for diamonds, and two spades for clubs, which was what I was suggesting here. Another style is to use two no-trump as natural, with two spades for clubs, three clubs for diamonds. This is equally playable and keeps two no-trump natural.
|
Holding ♠ 9-7-3, ♥ Q-5-2, ♦ K-7-3, ♣ K-Q-8-3, what are you supposed to respond to a natural one club opener? Would it matter if you play inverted minor raises here?
First Footer, Billings, Mont.
Whether you play inverted minors or not, this hand does not look ideal for a raise to two clubs, despite your chunky support, since partner might have only three clubs. Respond one notrump, and do not worry excessively about the fact that your spades are weak. If the suit is a danger, you may yet hear from the opponents, or partner may bid again. The fact that you have a balanced hand trumps your honorless suit.
Like many pairs coming into duplicate pairs, I want to ask your advice about defending to one notrump. I find Landy doesn’t let me come in on two-suited hands; do you have any advice?
The Beer Hunter, Wichita Falls, Texas
Your best choices amongst the methods commonly in use in the US are Meckwell, Woolsey, and DONT. Details are available here, and you can choose for yourself. All allow you to get in two-suited hands conveniently while abandoning the penalty double.
Facing a passed partner, my RHO opened one spade. Holding ♠ K-Q-J-7, ♥ K, ♦ A-10-5-4, ♣ A-10-7-5, I elected to bid one notrump as the least lie. My partner had six clubs to the queen-jack and the diamond king. With the club finesse working, we could make five clubs, but, alas, sold out to three hearts. I would like your comments on how the auction should go.
Honest Abe, Eau Claire, Wis.
I think you made a very reasonable decision here, even if it didn’t work. I’d assume your partner should transfer to clubs or bid the suit in competition – after which you might well raise to at least the four-level and can maybe get to game.
|
July 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, July 2nd, 2016
Dreams do come true, if only we wish hard enough. You can have anything in life if you will sacrifice everything else for it.
J. M. Barrie
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K J 10 5
♥ Q J 4 3
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ A 10 8 6
♦ J 10 8
♣ A J 9 |
♠ 7 3
♥ K 9 7 5 2
♦ K 9 7 6
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 6 2
♥ —
♦ A 4
♣ K 8 7 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
Just because you only have a nine-count you don’t have to go low with a raise to two spades. Your partner could easily have enough for game and not have rebid more than one spade. Your diamond fit is golden. If partner had opened one club, as in today’s deal, a simple raise to two spades would suffice here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 5
♥ Q J 4 3
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul — and sings the tunes without the words — and never stops at all.
Emily Dickinson
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 2
♥ A 6 3
♦ K Q J 9 8 5
♣ J 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 6 3
♥ Q J 10 8 5
♦ 4
♣ 8 7 |
♠ Q J 9 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ 7 2
♣ Q 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 8 4
♥ K 9 2
♦ A 10 6 3
♣ A K 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♦* |
3 ♠ |
4 ♠ |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
*Michaels, at least 5-5 in the majors
♠K
You may have only a 10-count but with your honors packed into your two suits, and an easy rebid, this is a sound if minimum opener. The intermediates are also relevant to this valuation – this hand has far more playing strength than a balanced 12-count.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 6 3
♥ Q J 10 8 5
♦ 4
♣ 8 7 |
July 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Let us have a quiet hour, Let us hob-and-nob with Death.
Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 5 4 2
♥ A 7 4
♦ K 8 2
♣ Q 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 6 3
♥ 9 6
♦ Q J 9 4
♣ 9 6 |
♠ 9
♥ K 10 8 5 2
♦ 7 5
♣ J 10 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ Q J 3
♦ A 10 6 3
♣ A K 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT** |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
**Natural and invitation
♦Q
The basic nature of your hand is limited and balanced with a minimum high card point-count for an opener. The best way to show this at once is to rebid two no-trump. I would not worry unduly about making this rebid with a doubleton queen in an unbid suit; it is more likely that you have to right-side no-trump from your hand than that clubs will be a fatally unguarded suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 5 4 2
♥ A 7 4
♦ K 8 2
♣ Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Respect was mingled with surprise, And the stern joy which warriors feel In foemen worthy of their steel.
Sir Walter Scott
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ Q 4 3
♦ A 10 6
♣ A 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 6
♥ 8 7 5
♦ J 9 8 7 5 4
♣ 6 |
♠ K Q J 8 7 3
♥ 6 2
♦ 2
♣ J 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A K J 10 9
♦ K Q 3
♣ K Q 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♣* |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠* |
Pass |
| 7 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Invitational
**Two key cards and the trump queen
♠10
Facing a balanced minimum hand it is undeniably possible that your side might make game. This will happen no more than one time in 10 perhaps, since you are offering your partner no source of tricks and just a 10 count. That being so, respond one notrump rather than raising clubs by using an inverted minor response. Do not jeopardize your plus score in search of the pot of gold.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 2
♥ Q 4 3
♦ A 10 6
♣ A 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
That monkeys once were men, peers, statesmen, flunkies — That’s rather hard on unoffending monkeys!
W. S. Gilbert
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 4
♥ J 8 7
♦ Q J 10 3
♣ 7 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 7 2
♥ A K 4
♦ A 9 8
♣ 6 2 |
♠ Q 6 5
♥ 9 6 5 2
♦ 7 6 4 2
♣ J 9 |
| South |
♠ A K 3
♥ Q 10 3
♦ K 5
♣ A K Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
Since introducing a three-card major is verboten, do you respond one no-trump or two clubs? In favor of bidding notrump is that partner will have the majors but may not have real club length, against it is that this call should show 7-10 or so. Your hand surely does not qualify in that category. I go for the suit bid, more because I want partner to be able to trust me the next time I bid no-trump here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4
♥ J 8 7
♦ Q J 10 3
♣ 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
‘If one approaches a problem with order and method, there should be no difficulty in solving it — none whatever,’ said Poirot severely. ‘Oh, I see,’ said Jane, who didn’t.
Agatha Christie
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A
♥ Q 6 4
♦ K Q J 6 3
♣ J 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6 3 2
♥ 8 3
♦ 8 5 2
♣ K 9 4 |
♠ 9 8 5 4
♥ K J 9 5
♦ A
♣ 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 7
♥ A 10 7 2
♦ 10 9 7 4
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
The fact that your partner has not raised diamonds suggests a lead in that suit might be dangerous. While nothing is in the slightest degree attractive, your partner surely has some club length. So without any confidence I’ll lead a low club, and try to find a way not to blow more than one trick for our side.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4 3
♥ J 4
♦ Q 10 7 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
I played last month with an occasional partner, whom I play with only two or three times a year. I had ♠ 10-7-3, ♥ A-J-6-5-3, ♦ Q-8, ♣ K-Q-4 and opened one heart. My left opponent overcalled one spade and my partner bid two diamonds, over which the next opponent passed. Should I have passed? If not what would be my call?
Wicked Witch, Jersey City, N.J.
New suits by responder as an unpassed hand are forcing, but not by a passed hand of course. So you cannot pass here even if you want to. Your choice is to raise diamonds, rebid hearts, bid no-trump or bid three clubs, all of which are seriously flawed. I’d opt for rebidding the hearts, but with jack-third of spades that might be the least lie, I suppose. There is nothing good here, but try to make your choice as smoothly as you can. The cheaper the call the less committal it rates to be.
Can you comment on how to use Gerber after a suit opening bid? When should the call of four clubs be ace-asking and when a cuebid?
Lip Syncher, Anchorage, Alaska
I think four clubs Gerber is a fine bid in its place – but its place is not in the middle of suit auctions. These days I do play a form of ace asking after a Stayman response to one no-trump finds a major-suit fit. By and large, though, I normally just use the call over openings or rebids of one no-trump. The reason is that cuebidding is too important to lose, and four notrump is rarely too expensive an enquiry – if used with discretion.
Is there any circumstance under which the opening hand could open with a suit which has only two of the suit bid? One of our bridge four said yes. I emphatically disagree.
Flora and Fauna, Panama City, Fla.
|
The question really relates to a one club opener in a 4-4-3-2 pattern with three diamonds. Partnership agreement varies here. I say one diamond is the Standard American opener, but I can see both sides of this coin. If you believe one diamond always delivers four you have to lie one way or the other; and does it matter in the long run? Probably not. A hand in the 1214/18-19 range with this pattern is sufficiently rare you can pretend it never happens!
I dealt myself the following hand ♠ 4, ♥ K-9-7-6-5-3-2, ♦ 8-5, ♣ A-10-8. Vulnerable I elected to open the bidding with two hearts because my suit was so weak. When my left hand opponent overcalled two spades, my partner doubled. What should I have done?
Covering the Spread, Mitchell, S.D.
You defined your hand precisely by your opening bid, so your partner’s double should be out-and-out penalties. You have an ace and a king, and nothing to be ashamed of, so you should pass happily enough. You may not beat the contract, but that really will not be your fault.
I play bridge with an expert who insists that a two over one response should always show five. She will bid a forcing no-trump even with extras over and above a minimum two over one. I think she’s wrong but I wanted to know what you think.
Overloaded, El Paso, Texas
In Standard American the forcing no-trump does cover a multitude of sins, and I can even understand making the call with a hand in the 13-14 range with no long suit to bid. But in my view the two-level responses do not guarantee five cards in the bid suit. And when you have a good hand don’t fool partner by making him think you are limited. Bid as naturally as you can, and if necessary lie with a two club response when all else fails.
|
July 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, June 25th, 2016
What! Wouldst thou have a serpent sting thee twice?
William Shakespeare
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 10 8 7 6
♥ 5
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 4 2
♥ K 8 7 6
♦ K 9
♣ A K 5 |
♠ 5 3
♥ 4 3
♦ J 10 4 2
♣ J 8 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ Q
♥ A Q J 10 9 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 NT |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Traditionally the response of two no-trump to a weak two bid asks for features, and while an ace or king is the desirable holding, queen-fourth (or even queen-third) will do at a pinch. You have enough to drive to game, of course, but who is to say where partner is heading? Don’t cross him up by jumping to game, when slam might be in the picture: bid three diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 8 7 6
♥ 5
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When South opens one club, West overcalls in hearts. Now, rather than raise clubs directly, North cuebids to show a strong hand. A jump in clubs would be preemptive. Since South has a stopper in the enemy’s suit, he bids two no-trump (a non-forcing call facing a limit raise) and North raises him to game.
After the low heart lead, South can see that he needs at least two club tricks to make his contract. All would be fine if the club finesse happens to work, but if the club finesse loses, South must expect to have to face an avalanche of hearts.
It looks normal to put up the heart queen from dummy and cross to hand to try the club finesse. However, when this loses, a heart return would give West five tricks in that suit, to take the contract two down.
South must take out insurance against the club finesse losing by ducking the opening lead in both hands. Since East has only two hearts, this unusual holdup play will bring home the contract today. South can later take the club finesse in safety, as East will not be able to get to his partner’s hand for the rest of the hearts.
Note: this play would not work if hearts were 5-3 and the club finesse lost – but then the contract could never be made. And also note that if the club queen and ace are switched, it is safe to win the heart queen and run the club queen into the non-danger hand.