June 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The offspring of cold hearts and muddy understandings.
Edmund Burke
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 10 5 2
♥ 8 6
♦ K 4
♣ K 9 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 4 3
♥ 3
♦ Q 10 6 5
♣ Q J 10 3 |
♠ 8 7
♥ 4 2
♦ J 9 8 3 2
♣ A 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 6
♥ A K Q J 10 9 7 5
♦ A 7
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
Since the opponents have found a low-level fit, your partner is doubling for take-out. I’d guess he has a shape like 2=2=4=5, and your best spot must be clubs. It is irrelevant that your RHO has opened the suit – East could easily have a three-card suit. Even if he has four, your intermediates suggest you should be able to cope with any bad break easily enough.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 5 2
♥ 8 6
♦ K 4
♣ K 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Man, of all the animals, is probably the only one to regard himself as a great delicacy.
Jacques Yves Cousteau
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 7 3
♥ A K 5 2
♦ K J 7
♣ K J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 4
♥ —
♦ 10 5 4 3
♣ 9 8 6 5 2 |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ A 9 6 2
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ 5 2
♥ Q 10 7 6 4
♦ Q 8
♣ A 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥* |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦** |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Two kings or one ace
**Transfer to hearts
♠J
Your partner has set up a forcing auction (had he bid hearts at his second turn that would have been a very good hand – this is a better one). I can’t see three no-trump as being a sensible spot, so I’ll repeat my clubs and cross my fingers we have a fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9
♥ —
♦ 10 5 4 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Avoid shame but do not seek glory – nothing so expensive as glory.
Sydney Smith
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8 4
♥ K Q 10 3 2
♦ J 10
♣ Q 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7
♥ A 8
♦ K 8 5 4 3
♣ J 6 5 2 |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ J 9 7 4
♦ Q 6 2
♣ K 10 9 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 9 3
♥ 6 5
♦ A 9 7
♣ A 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
On auctions of this sort, some people play that even though the auction is game forcing, responder can limit his hand to a minimum response (say 6-8 points) with a call of two no-trump. In the absence of this agreement, simply give preference to three clubs, and let partner describe his hand further.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 2
♥ J 9 7 4
♦ Q 6 2
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
For some cry ‘Quick’ and some cry ‘Slow’.
Alfred Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 4
♥ 9 7 6 5
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ J 10 |
♠ Q 10 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K 9 6
♥ A K 8 4 3
♦ 4
♣ A Q 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦** |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts, game forcing
**Shortness
♣J
Your two diamond call set up a game-forcing auction. In any sequence of this sort, your jump to three no-trump shows the equivalent of a strong no-trump. This means that your partner can bid on with real extras in high cards or shape. A call of two no-trump here by you would show a balanced hand, 12-14 or 18+.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The road to resolution lies by doubt; The next way home’s the farthest way about.
Francis Quarles
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 5 2
♥ Q 3
♦ A 7 5 2
♣ 8 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ A 9
♦ J 6 4
♣ K Q J 9 4 |
♠ 10 3
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ A 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A J 8 7 4
♥ K J 10 8 6
♦ K Q
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
You have two enticing sequences to lead from. Should you pick one of them, or lead partner’s suit, or even trump? All four options make sense, but I can’t see how there is any rush to lead spades. I can, however see how it might be necessary to go after either red suit at once. I’ll trust partner’s overcall though, and lead hearts; I’ve been wrong before, but rarely through lack of discipline.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 4
♥ J 6 3
♦ Q J 10
♣ J 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I note that there are auctions where both players only use cuebidding, some where they use Blackwood, and some where there is a mixed strategy. Could you give me some insight as to when one approach wins out over the others?
Merry Andrew, Dover, Del.
The simple answer is that Blackwood is about system, cuebidding about judgment, so the former is easier. You tend to cuebid only when you want partner to cooperate for slam with extras, or (far more commonly) when there is a danger suit, where the partnership can identify that a control in that specific suit is critical to the chances of making slam.
In fourth seat with both sides vulnerable you hold ♠ 10, ♥ K-Q, ♦ K-J-7-3-2, ♣ A-Q-9-5-3, and hear a two heart call on your right. Would you show the minors, (and if so how?) would you pass, or would you bid one of the minors? I assume double is out of the question?
Noisy Oyster, Dodge City, Kan.
I might well elect to bid one of the minors, rather than show both minors (the only way I could do that would be to bid four no-trump, since a call of two no-trump is strong and natural). There is certainly a case for bidding three clubs, but I’m not especially worried about running into a penalty double. I think bidding three diamonds caters better for further competition in the auction.
I enjoyed the deals you ran from Frank Stewart’s most recent book, but on one hand he overcalled one spade with a bid of two hearts, on a five-card suit and a minimum opener. Do you agree with the overcall? Holding five hearts would suggest a bid of two hearts, but would the possession of two doubleton minor suit queens and four spades to the queen-jack have made one no-trump a better call?
Mayday, Harrisburg, Pa.
|
I would never overcall one no-trump with a 4-5-2-2 shape, unless the hearts were so weak that I could pretend it was a four-card suit. Yes, passing an opening bid feels wrong here – so long as the hearts are really worth bidding. A one-level overcall needs far less, of course. The vulnerability and position do play a part, though, and a sixth trump would make a huge difference.
Members of our bridge club always seem keen to open two clubs with a strong hand but fewer than 20 HCP, when they have extra shape. The call may or may not be artificial. I have tried to persuade them to keep the forcing call for really good hands, but to no avail. How should I make my case?
Doc Holliday, Waterbury, Conn.
When holding a balanced hand of 18-19 points open your long suit and jump in notrumps. An opening bid of two no-trump shows 20-22. When unbalanced in the range 19-21, you normally bid your long suit, and should only open with a forcing call if you can visualize game facing a well-fitting hand of 0-4 points. You must have a long suit or possess a real two-suiter to make this call.
I had the following hand yesterday ♠ Q-9, ♥ K-7, ♦ A-K-8-4, ♣ A-J-10-8-2 and I did not know how whether to open a suit or one no-trump in fourth chair.
Mumbles, Boston, Mass.
With honor-doubletons in your short suits, it seems sensible to limit the hand at one go, and let partner know what you have at once by opening one notrump. You might miss a minor suit game, but otherwise this not only feels like the right evaluation, you also protect your doubleton honors from a lead through them.
|
June 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.
George S. Patton
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 4 2
♥ K 9 3
♦ Q J 10
♣ 8 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ Q J 10 4
♦ 9 8 6 4
♣ A K J |
♠ 7
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A 7 5 3 2
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 9 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Four spades, 6-9 HCP
♣K
They say the perfect is the enemy of the good. While you could explore for an ideal fit for a club game or slam, what is in front of your nose is a hand that should play in partscore or game in spades. You may have 17 HCP, but your honors in your short suits aren’t pulling their weight. Treat the hand as a spade invitation, by jumping to three spades. If partner cannot bid game, it won’t be a good contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 9 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
George Orwell
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 8 2
♥ Q 4 3
♦ K 7 4
♣ A K J |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 9 8 6 5
♦ Q 10 5 3 2
♣ 9 8 |
♠ 7 3
♥ K 10 7
♦ J 9 8
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 6 5
♥ A J 2
♦ A 6
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
*Game-forcing with spades
♥9
You are far too good to pass, of course. You have two sensible options: these are to overcall one no-trump, which shows a balanced 18-19, or you can double for take-out. I’m torn here; the no-trump call is more descriptive given your honor structure, but slightly more dangerous. Since I have lived (and occasionally died) by the motto “Too dangerous is no excuse” I’ll bid one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 8 2
♥ Q 4 3
♦ K 7 4
♣ A K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Give all thou canst: Heaven rejects the lore Of nicely calculated less or more.
William Wordsworth
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K J
♥ A K Q
♦ A J 5 2
♣ A K 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7
♥ 10 8 6 4 2
♦ K Q 7
♣ 8 7 3 |
♠ Q 10 6 4 3 2
♥ 9 5 3
♦ —
♣ Q J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 8 5
♥ J 7
♦ 10 9 8 6 4 3
♣ 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Balanced game-force or hearts
♥4
You may only have a five-count but your hand looks to have enough extra shape in terms of club fit and spade length to be worth a shot at game. Spades rates to be easier to make than clubs, even if you have a 4-4 fit, so I would simply jump to four spades now. In this auction, unless playing Wolff signoff, all continuations are game-forcing, by the way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4 3 2
♥ 10 5 4
♦ —
♣ Q J 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Common sense always speaks too late. …Common sense is the little man in a gray suit who never makes a mistake in addition. But it’s always somebody’s else’s money he’s adding up.
Raymond Chandler
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ —
♥ K 7 2
♦ A Q 7 4 2
♣ Q J 9 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 10 8
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ K 8
♣ 6 3 |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ 6 3
♦ J 10 9
♣ K 10 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 7 6 3
♥ A Q 9 5
♦ 6 5 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
It is tempting to redouble and go head hunting, and indeed at certain vulnerabilities that might be a sensible approach. But if the option is to make a forcing call of one spade, I prefer that route. It becomes surprisingly difficult to get these invitational hands off your chest unless you start low, and waiting around won’t make them any easier to describe.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 10 8
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ K 8
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Rubber bridge is an exciting form of the game – and there can be a lot of money riding on your decisions, not just the glory of matchpoints or IMPs. This deal cropped up at TGR’s rubber bridge club in London. Put yourself in the West seat by covering up the East and South hands for the moment.
What would you lead against six hearts, reached on a delicately nuanced auction?
At the table West chose the club queen, which held the first trick, East, a good player, playing the seven and declarer contributing the five. What now?
When West continued with the club jack, declarer did not cover in dummy but ruffed in hand. He ran all but one of the trumps and cashed the diamond ace and king, reaching a three-card ending in which dummy had the bare spade ace and two clubs, while declarer had two spades and a heart in hand.
Since West could not pitch a spade or declarer would cash the spade ace and his hand would be high, he came down to the bare club 10. Declarer read the position perfectly when he led the club king, ruffed away East’s ace, and now dummy was high.
Should West have got the position right? I think so. East was known to have the club ace by the end of trick one, so his seven should be a count card not attitude. To defeat the contract, West must shift to a top spade at trick two, to take out declarer’s vital entry to dummy prematurely.