June 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
You can discern the face of the sky; but can you not discern the times of the times.
Book of Matthew
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 2
♥ 10 7 2
♦ Q J 8 7 6
♣ A K 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 6 5 4
♥ K J 8 3
♦ K 2
♣ 9 5 |
♠ 10 9 3
♥ A 6 4
♦ 9 5
♣ 8 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ Q 9 5
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
Unpalatable as it may appear at first glance, I believe your best bet is to rebid one notrump, showing a balanced hand and simulating a heart stopper. The unattractive alternatives are to raise spades on a doubleton, which I would hate to do even if partner had promised five, and to rebid diamonds, which really ought to show six, or a far better suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 2
♥ 10 7 2
♦ Q J 8 7 6
♣ A K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Defer not till tomorrow to be wise, Tomorrow’s sun to thee may never rise.
William Congreve
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6
♥ 8 5 4
♦ Q J 10 5
♣ A 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9
♥ 10 9 7 3
♦ A 9 8 3
♣ J 3 |
♠ Q 3
♥ J 2
♦ K 7 4 2
♣ K Q 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7 5 4 2
♥ A K Q 6
♦ 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
The opponents opted to play no-trump in the face of your call, but did not try to penalize you. Does that argue for leading spades? I think not; and a doubleton heart lead is hardly attractive either. Play partner for a shape such as 3=4=2=4 and lead a club, hoping to set up that suit eventually.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 4 2
♥ J 2
♦ 10 7 2
♣ J 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
After a strong no-trump opening bid, what would you recommend for an intermediate player to use for responder’s immediate actions at the three-level?
Princess Bride, Monterey, Calif.
Let’s assume the calls of two spades and two no-trump are used as transfers to clubs and diamonds respectively. One sensible option is for a call of three clubs to show both minors, invitational, and three diamonds for both minors game-forcing. Now the major-suit bids would show 5-4 in the minors either way, bidding your shortage. If you prefer three clubs to be Puppet Stayman for five-card majors, that also makes sense.
Could you comment on how one should bid over an overcall of the unusual no-trump. Does something called Unusual versus Unusual apply? And do the same methods apply after a Michaels Cuebid?
Cotton Picker, Casper, Wyo.
If the opponents show a specific pair of suits, the highest cuebid below three of partner’s suit shows a limit raise or better. So after an overcall of two notrump over one diamond, showing clubs and hearts, a cue-bid by you of three clubs would show a good hand with diamonds. Following an overcall of two no-trump over one heart, the relevant cue-bid would be three diamonds. If there is a second cuebid available, it should show at least invitational values with the fourth suit, with a direct bid of the fourth suit as non-forcing.
I am an 80 year old Life Master. I have thought for my entire bridge career that leading the ace from ace-king makes sense. What is the logic behind leading the king?
Elmer Fuddy-Duddy, Trenton, N.J.
|
This is almost a toss-up. The king works poorly in one specific position (dummy has small cards and you have jackthird/fourth and do not know whether to encourage or not). As against that, it lets you work out when to encourage on ace leads, and when to give count on king leads. So long as you know what your partnership does (and so long as you use king from ace-king in mid-hand so as to get count, ace to get attitude – which applies in bid and supported suits at trick one) that is the most important thing.
I have a question regarding a recent response you gave in the letters page. You stated that a double of an artificial raise by an unpassed hand might sensibly be played as either takeout, or showing the suit doubled. How strong does a raise have to be before the double is lead-directional rather than takeout?
Puppy Dog, Duluth, Minn.
I think any time the opponents promise an opener facing a limit raise, you do not want to get involved in the bidding except to double for a lead. If the artificial call is weak or otherwise limited, you need a take-out double of their agreed suit. I think a double of Drury should be clubs.
What sort of hand should you have for a raise of partner’s weak two to three? Would your answer change if your RHO had doubled the weak two?
Barry Cader, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
A sequence like this could be almost anything – other than strong. It could be based on a balanced 13-count, trying to tempt the opponents into the auction. Equally it could be a balanced Yarborough (taking away the cuebid raise from the opponents in case they have a game or slam on). The call is simply a bar bid – but not indicating one hand-type or another.
|
June 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Think left and think right and think low and think high. Oh, the thinks you can think up if only you try!
Dr. Seuss
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7 6
♥ J 3
♦ K Q J 10 9 8
♣ Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 6 4
♦ 3
♣ 8 5 3 |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ A Q 5
♦ A 7 4 2
♣ K J 10 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ K 7 2
♦ 6 5
♣ A 7 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Standard expert practice here is to use Crawling Stayman, to get to your best fit at the two-level. Here you can bid two clubs, planning to pass a response in a major but to bid two hearts over a response of two diamonds. This last call would show both majors and no game interest. Your partner must pass or correct two hearts to two spades with 3-2 in the majors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 6 4
♦ 3
♣ 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
And then I Formulated a Plan. And that made me feel better because there was something in my head that had an order and a pattern and I just had to follow the instructions one after the other.
Mark Haddon
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ A 7 6 2
♦ K Q 3
♣ 10 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 2
♥ K J 8 5 3
♦ J 9 8 4
♣ K 8 |
♠ K J 9
♥ Q 10 4
♦ 7 6
♣ Q 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 9
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ A J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Drury
♥5
You have no idea if game is the limit in spades, or if you should play a small or even a grand slam. A jump to four spades would surely end the auction. So you should cuebid four hearts, planning to raise a four spade call to five. Since a direct jump to five spades would have asked for a heart control, this sequence should simply be offering partner the chance to evaluate his hand for slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 9
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ A J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The minute you settle for less than you deserve, you get even less than you settled for.
Maureen Dowd
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ Q 8 6 5 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ K 9 4
♦ 7 3
♣ A K Q 7 2 |
♠ 8 6 5 3
♥ Q 6 3
♦ A 4
♣ J 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10
♥ A 10 5
♦ K J 10 9
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
There is room for a difference of opinion here, but in my view this sequence is natural, showing good spades and a strong hand. If your partner was strong and balanced he would double, with the red suits he has a cuebid of two clubs available, so the bid of two spades should be reserved. This being so, you should pass. With the club king in addition, you might bid two notrump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ Q 8 6 5 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Seldom, very seldom, does complete truth belong to any human disclosure; seldom can it happen that something is not a little disguised or a little mistaken.
Jane Austen
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 5
♥ K J 3
♦ K Q 8 7
♣ J 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 7 4 2
♥ —
♦ J 9 4 3 2
♣ 5 3 |
♠ 10 6
♥ A Q 8 6 5 2
♦ 10 6 5
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 3
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ A
♣ A K Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
This is not the moment to introduce a three-card major. Your practical choices are to bid clubs — and you could choose between the simple call and the jump – or the bid of one no-trump. For many reasons I prefer the one notrump call. This directs partner’s attention towards the most practical game, while showing scattered values and a diamond stopper. How bad can that be?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ K J 3
♦ K Q 8 7
♣ J 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 31st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It is sometimes a bit of a shock to be reminded that, in operational and practical fact, the medium is the message.
Marshall McLuhan
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A K Q J
♥ 8 3
♦ A K 7 3
♣ J 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ K J 9 5
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ Q 9 2 |
♠ 10 9 5 2
♥ A 6 4 2
♦ Q 10 2
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 7 4 3
♥ Q 10 7
♦ 9 5
♣ A K 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
The disadvantages of bidding one spade here are illusory. If partner passes, what game are you likely to miss, since most hands with scattered values and four spades will raise to two here? With all your values concentrated in two suits, this doesn’t feel like a hand where you need to commit to no-trump yet. A jump to two spades would be game forcing; you’d need a fifth diamond to make that call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J
♥ 8 3
♦ A K 7 3
♣ J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 30th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I created you while I was happy, while I was sad, with so many incidents, so many details.
Cavafy
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ A K Q 8 7
♦ Q 7
♣ 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 6 3
♦ K J 4 2
♣ A K J 8 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ J 10 9 5
♦ 10 9 6 5
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9 8 4
♥ 4 2
♦ A 8 3
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
I would lead a club here rather than gamble on the heart ace. My mild preference is for a low club, since dummy is quite likely to be short in that suit. If West has a singleton or doubleton honor, I might well find that I would regret having squandered an important spot card at trick one.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ A Q 7
♦ J 5 4 3
♣ J 10 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
I know it may be hard to generalize, but could you comment on when if at all it is appropriate to cuebid shortage in partner’s suit?
Mini Cowper, Pittsburgh, Pa.
One tends not to cuebid shortage in partner’s suit at the first turn, but after that, there are no such limitations. An exception even to this rule, is when you can jump to show unequivocal shortage — rather than fit — for partner. Imagine a sequence starting: one club – one heart two hearts. Now in my book, and I hope also in yours, a jump to four clubs would unequivocally show shortness in clubs and a heart slam try.
After the opponents open one notrump, be it weak or strong, and your partner passes, what should double by fourth hand mean when responder to the no-trump uses Stayman or a transfer?
Catcher in the Rye, Bay City, Mich.
When opponents play a strong no-trump (let’s say 14 up) you are more likely to want to plan the defense than drive to game, so it makes the most sense for your first double to be lead-directing. The double of the response to a weaker no-trump opener can be played as high cards by an unpassed hand, starting at about the top of their range. To double for takeout, pass initially, then double when they complete the transfer.
I recently tried an SOS redouble at the four-level, more in hope than expectation, I admit. Some of our stronger local club players insist that a redouble above the three-level is never SOS. So could you clarify for me when these doubles apply, and to what level they may be appropriate?
Runner Bean, Evanston, Ill.
|
I think on any sequence where both players can see that playing and making a doubled contract would be a great score, the redouble should be rescue. So whenever you could pass out a double, a redouble should be rescue. That will be very rare at the four-level, but maybe not impossible. Never say never…
I was recently confronted with an awkward problem, doubtless exacerbated by the fact that we play new suits non-forcing after the opponents come in. I held: ♠ 3-2, ♥ A-K-Q-10-3, ♦ A-9-4-2, ♣ 4-2 and heard one diamond from my partner, two clubs to my right. I had to double, and over a three spade response I bid four hearts. But now my partner rebid four spades, and when I bid five diamonds he passed with a 5-1-6-1 shape, missing our cold slam.
Tricky Dicky, Charleston, S.C.
You identified your main problem already. Do I need to say what a bad idea it is to cater to bidding your bad hands at the expense of your good hands? But if your partner had good spades and good diamonds why didn’t he bid four spades at his second turn? Then you might jump to six diamonds. Even at his final turn he might work out to do more if he has six decent diamonds, and it sounds like he does.
Could you give me a general rule, about the second call made by an overcaller assuming his partner passes at his first turn to respond? When, if ever, can an overcaller bid no-trump naturally, or double for penalty?
Mason Dixon, Texarkana, Texas
Overcaller cannot make a penalty doubles of a suit agreed by the opponents. And when you overcall and face a passing partner, all reopening doubles are take-out of suits bid by either LHO or RHO. Overcaller can bid one no-trump naturally, rare as this is, at his second turn. But almost other no-trump calls facing a silent partner tend to be unusual, two-suited take-out.
|
|
Mike Lawrence’s latest book, Tips on Cardplay, published by Master Point Press, contains this gem.
West leads the spade five against three no-trump. Dummy wins with the queen and you follow with the 10, suggesting the nine. This is not suit preference, it simply tells your partner what you have in spades.
At trick two, declarer finesses the diamond queen to West’s king. West shifts to the heart three and you take your ace. What now, and why?
You must return the heart six. West switched to a little heart, showing interest in hearts. If West had wanted you to revert to spades, he would have led a high heart spot to convey no interest. How else can you tell partner what you want him to do?
Lawrence notes that at the end of trick one you will often know whether your opening lead was a good lead or a bad one, but your partner may not be so sure. Later, when you get in, if you want him to return your new suit, lead a little card. If you want him to return your original suit, lead a high card.
If East-West don’t have this understanding, East might return a spade, playing West for the ace-jack of spades, allowing declarer to emerge with 10 tricks.
Lawrence also notes that you should return the heart six, whereas if you were left with 6-54, you would return the four. You are trying to tell partner how many hearts you have remaining, in case this affects his subsequent defense.