June 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Who can tell the mischief which the very virtuous do?
William Makepeace Thackeray
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 6
♥ 8 5 3
♦ 8 7 4 3 2
♣ 7 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5 4 3 2
♥ 6 2
♦ J 5
♣ K Q 9 6 |
♠ K Q 8 7
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ A K Q J 10
♦ A Q
♣ A 10 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
*Second negative
♣K
There are number of ways you can misdescribe your hand here. You could bid two notrump, overbidding your hand by at least a queen, or repeat your spades, pretending you had a six-card suit. But the simplest and best way to describe this hand is to give preference to hearts. This suggests a doubleton and 6-10 points; perfect!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 8 7 4
♥ 7 4
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Fanatics have their dreams, wherewith they weave a paradise for a sect.
John Keats
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 2
♥ 4 2
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A J 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 3
♥ 10 9 8 7 5
♦ Q 10
♣ 10 5 2 |
♠ J 10 8 6
♥ J
♦ K J 8 5
♣ K Q 9 7 |
| South |
♠ K 5 4
♥ A K Q 6 3
♦ A 6 3 2
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
That two spade call should be natural – you cannot afford to have the opponents stealing your suits with little or no excuse. You do not really care if your RHO is playing silly games, you should raise to four spades, and let your partner worry about that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 2
♥ 4 2
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A J 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
This ideal conception — that one should have an aim in life — had, indeed, only too often occurred to me as an unsolved problem; but I was still far from deciding what form my endeavors should ultimately take.
Anthony Powell
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ J 2
♦ A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q 10 8 4
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 10 8 7 4 3 |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ K 9 5
♦ K J 9 6 3
♣ A 9 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9 8
♥ A 7 6 3
♦ —
♣ J 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT* |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*Non-serious try for slam
♣7
It feels right to lead trump, to cut out spade ruffs in dummy. That being said, a low heart is surely best, since you can hardly afford to waste one of your spots, and the odds are heavily in your favor that partner has one of the top four missing hearts.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 3
♥ J 10 8 2
♦ K J 6 5 2
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 26 Comments
|
I wonder whether you have any comments on whether a jump overcall of three clubs over one club can be more usefully assigned to a meaning other than natural and weak. I don’t believe that a jump cuebid as an attempt to find partner with a club stopper for no-trump comes up as often as a specific two-suiter (say diamonds and spades). That lets the simple cuebid be a specific major-minor two-suiter. What is your view?
Ghestem Well, North Bay, Ontario
Over a one club opener I think using the jump cuebid as a two-suiter makes reasonable sense. Over any other opener, I’m not so sure: I can see both sides of this issue. A lifetime of playing Michaels as an unspecified two-suiter suggests that accidents when not knowing the second suit are rare – though they are admittedly extremely expensive!
After my RHO opened a weak two spades I tried three diamonds, and heard three spades to my left. When this came back to me I wasn’t sure if I should bid or pass holding ♠ 7-3, ♥ A-2, ♦ K-Q-7-4-3, ♣ A-K-10-3. As it turned out both three spades and four clubs are cold but I didn’t think I could act facing a passing partner.
Standing Stone, Phoenix, Ariz.
You have a decent hand but only limited extras. Double would be takeout, and I think you are too balanced to drive your partner to the four-level in a four-card suit, if you bid four clubs, wouldn’t your partner raise to game? So passing and hoping to beat three spades is reasonable, as is the call of four clubs.
In a recent column of yours, a two club opener is followed immediately by a four- club preempt by opener’s LHO. When partner then bid four spades and opener raised to five spades, the column said this last bid asked for a club control. Isn’t five spades a small slam force?
Buck Passer, San Francisco, Calif.
|
I follow Alan Hiron’s rule on bids of five of a major. In order of priority, this ask for control of the danger suit, or says that your trumps are so weak that Blackwood won’t help you find out if we belong in slam. Rarely it says that all you have is good trumps, but no control in any suit that has not been cuebid. Here the logical meaning is to focus on clubs; you’d cuebid five clubs to set spades if you could. Hence you have no club control.
Can you predict whether the USA will continue to fight it out for world domination in bridge? If not, who will take over at the top?
Nostradamus, Oklahoma City, Okla.
A few years ago (in this column in 2007) I predicted that the Polish training schemes for juniors would give them a real chance to dominate at the junior level, and that in 10 years many of those players would be at the very top of the tree. They have won the last two world titles – so kudos to me! My next forecast; watch the Swedish juniors in the next decade compete at the very top level, while the US Juniors are not far behind.
If I get paired with a new partner whom I never met before, what are the critical agreements I should need to establish? Would it make a difference in the context of having played for a long time – if not necessarily being an expert?
Questing Beast, Sunbury, Pa.
How about asking these questions. “Do you play 2/1 game-forcing, and Forcing no-trump? Do you play two-suit or four-suit transfers? What is a two no-trump response to a major, and to a minor? What kind of carding do you use, and what kind of jump shifts and no-trump defense do you play? And do you play New Minor Forcing or any kind of checkback after opener’s no-trump rebids?”
|
June 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Those who talk about the future are scoundrels. It is the present that matters. To evoke one’s posterity is to make a speech to maggots.
Louis Ferdinand Celine
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 5
♥ A K J
♦ Q 9 6 4 3
♣ 10 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A 10 2
♣ K Q J 6 4 2 |
♠ K J 10 8 7 4 3
♥ 4 3
♦ J 8
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A 6 2
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ K 7 5
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠9
You were planning to respond two hearts and support spades later — but East has spoiled your fun by preempting. Give up on showing hearts and simply support spades. Your choices are a four-diamond cue bid, suggesting game going values with a fit, and a jump to four spades, which tends to be more about fit than high cards. Your hand falls between these two actions; I’ll go for the cuebid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 2
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ K 7 5
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
By persuading others we convince ourselves.
Junius
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K
♥ Q J 3
♦ A K 10 6 4
♣ A J 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J
♥ K 9 8 7 5
♦ Q J 8 5
♣ 4 2 |
♠ 4 3
♥ A 10 6 4
♦ 7 2
♣ K Q 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 7 6 5 2
♥ 2
♦ 9 3
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦Q
Although your hand might look very strong, facing a limited partner you have only three hearts, and the spade king is something of a broken reed. You might make three no-trump here, but I don’t see how you could ever sensibly bid it, so my best guess would be to pass two hearts and hope to go plus here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ Q J 3
♦ A K 10 6 4
♣ A J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A Daniel come to judgment, yea, a Daniel!
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 5
♥ 5 3
♦ A Q J 8 7 6 4
♣ J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 8 3
♥ Q 9 2
♦ 5
♣ K Q 10 8 4 |
♠ Q 10 6 4 2
♥ 10
♦ K 2
♣ A 9 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 9
♥ A K J 8 7 6 4
♦ 10 9 3
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Your hand probably belongs in three no-trump, and it seems sensible to make that call. Is it possible you are off the whole heart suit? Yes, but it is very unlikely since your partner either has a really good hand or both red suits. And if your partner has clubs, you will hear about it on the next round of the auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4 2
♥ 10
♦ K 2
♣ A 9 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Put all your eggs in one basket and WATCH THAT BASKET.
Mark Twain
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 7 5
♥ 8 3
♦ 10 5
♣ A 6 5 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K 6
♣ J 10 8 |
♠ 9 6 4
♥ K J 7 4
♦ J 9 8 4 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
♠ 8 2
♥ A Q 10 5
♦ A Q 7
♣ K Q 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♠* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Clubs
♠K
Your hand is certainly worth a try for game. I cannot bring myself to invite in notrump (my partner could have an opening bid and we could still be off the first nine tricks) so my next call has to be in spades or diamonds. A simple raise to three diamonds looks safest, but I prefer a call of two spades since this seems the most likely game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 10 3
♥ 9 6 2
♦ K 6
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Youth is a blunder; Manhood a struggle; Old Age a regret.
Benjamin Disraeli
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 4
♥ K J 6
♦ K J 10 4
♣ K 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 3 2
♥ A 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7 3
♣ 8 |
♠ 6
♥ Q 8 5 3
♦ Q 9 6 5
♣ Q J 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 5
♥ 10 9
♦ 2
♣ A 10 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
New suits are forcing in response to overcalls of weak bids. One must play that way, because otherwise the opponents can interfere fatally with your constructive bidding. It is a good idea that one should never preempt against preempts, and equally, never reserve calls to show weak hands after they preempt against you. So here you can bid two spades and be confident that it is forcing.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J 10 5
♥ 10 9
♦ 2
♣ A 10 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
As soon as you see a mistake and don’t fix it, it becomes your mistake.
Anonymous
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 8 6
♥ Q 6
♦ Q J 10 4
♣ K Q 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 3
♥ A J 8 5 2
♦ A 9 3
♣ A 9 |
♠ 10 7 5 4 2
♥ 9 7
♦ 8 7 2
♣ 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ K 10 4 3
♦ K 6 5
♣ J 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥5
East’s decision to blast slam without using Blackwood suggests a void – so he rates to have a two or threesuited hand. You could make a good case for a passive trump, a diamond from the sequence (which is relatively unlikely to cost the setting trick) or the club ace. I’ll go for the diamond jack, and start preparing my apologies in advance.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 3
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ J 10 6
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal North showed a second negative at his second turn, then had a problem at his third turn over South’s three notrump call. Declarer would have had just eight tricks in no-trump today, so North’s decision to convert to four hearts was not unreasonable, and it left South in a contract with decent play. Even with the diamond finesse onside, declarer still needed some cooperation from the defenders. However, he received some help when West quite naturally led a top club.
South realized he would need the diamond finesse, but that a 4-2 club break might cause him some big trouble. He also realized that he wanted a club continuation at trick two, so when East followed low to the first trick South dropped the 10. Although a spade shift would have been the killer, West naturally continued with a low club, and declarer captured East’s jack, drew one round of trumps, and played a third club. East showed out on this trick, so West led a fourth club. Declarer would have gone down had he ruffed in dummy, but he carefully discarded the losing spade from dummy. From this point on he could not be prevented from drawing a second trump, ruffing a spade in dummy, and taking the diamond finesse for his 10th trick.
Although the defenders could have prevailed by shifting to a spade at trick two (and might have done so had South followed with a small club at the first trick) one can hardly blame West for his club continuation. Sometimes you have to pay off to a nice play.