June 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I was somewhat confused about a sequence you ran recently where after a two club opening bid and two diamond response, opener bid two no-trump. Why did responder now bid three hearts with five spades – and why did opener bid three spades at his next turn after that?
Head Scratcher, Pottsville, Pa.
I apologize for forgetting to draw attention to the transfer response here. The continuations after a two no-trump opener or two notrump rebid are parallel to Jacoby Transfers. The logic is that you give up playing in three diamonds but in return you get as responder to describe your hand much more fully by transferring then bidding on as appropriate. That lets the unknown hand describe itself far more fully. Just for the record, transfers apply after overcalls of two no-trump as well.
In a recent deal I saw that responder to an opening bid of one diamond with a relatively balanced hand (but a small doubleton spade together with four diamonds) and only eight points, chose to reply one no-trump rather than raising diamonds. Would it not be more suitable to support partner at your first turn?
Raising an Eyebrow, Taos, N.M.
There are two reasons for not raising diamonds. A one notrump call typically indicates 6-10 points, so you are within range for the call. More to the point, a simple raise of diamonds might not be available if your partnership plays inverted minors (where a raise to two shows at least invitational values, while a double raise is preemptive). The flaw in these methods is that in-between hands of this sort sometimes have to slightly misrepresent themselves.
What are your personal preferences for discarding? Do you advocate high for encouraging, or upside down, or Roman discards (odd encouraging, even suit-preference) or some other form of discards linked to suit preference one way or another?
Two-Buck Chuck, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
|
The more straightforward the method, the better. I am happy enough with standard discards, but I believe there is little theoretical advantage in one method over another. I admit, the one flaw in standard is that players frequently discard tricks to tell their partner something they may know already. And I concede that if people do not ask what you play, an unusual methods may pay dividends.
You ran a deal last month where after a one no-trump opening and a transfer to three clubs, responder bid a new suit, which was described as shortness. When opener retreated to three no-trump, it was presumably to play. Now responder continued with four no-trump; should this be Blackwood, or does Gerber apply here?
Counting Crows, Augusta, Ga.
To ask for aces in a minor set the suit via the transfer, then play that raising the minor to the four-level (or bidding one over the minor if you prefer) is ace asking. A direct rebid of four no-trump here would be quantitative without a singleton. As soon as you show shortness, you transfer control to your partner — if you wanted to ask for aces you’d have done so already. Thus four clubs over three no-trump is natural and slammish not asking and four no-trump is non-forcing.
I opened one heart with ♠ J-2, ♥ A-Q-7-5-2, ♦ J-4, ♣ K-J-3-2, and heard my partner respond two diamonds (which we play as game-forcing). Should I rebid my hearts, introduce two no-trump, or try three clubs?
Triple Trouble, Spartanburg, S.C.
If you did not play this sequence as game-forcing, rebidding two hearts would be clear-cut. It does NOT promise a six-bagger, unlike a situation where you rebid your own suit after a one-level response. But as it is, I think I still go for the rebid in hearts; my hand is too weak in the context of introducing a four-card suit, and my spade stopper is too feeble to be happy with a call of two no-trump. Alter the spade jack to the queen, and I might change my mind.
|
June 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best, removes all that is base.
George S. Patton
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 7 5
♥ K 9 6 5 2
♦ K J 4
♣ K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 2
♥ 10 7
♦ 8 7 5
♣ Q J 10 9 4 2 |
♠ J 10 4
♥ Q J 8 4 3
♦ Q 10 9
♣ A 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 6 3
♥ A
♦ A 6 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
Your plan was only to invite game had East passed. But since a call of three hearts here would now be at best a constructive hand, not a real invitation, you must jump to four hearts. The combination of your fifth trump, and all your cards working well facing likely spade shortage, means this is hardly an overbid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4
♥ Q J 8 4 3
♦ Q 10 9
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The offspring of cold hearts and muddy understandings.
Edmund Burke
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 10 5 2
♥ 8 6
♦ K 4
♣ K 9 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 4 3
♥ 3
♦ Q 10 6 5
♣ Q J 10 3 |
♠ 8 7
♥ 4 2
♦ J 9 8 3 2
♣ A 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 6
♥ A K Q J 10 9 7 5
♦ A 7
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
Since the opponents have found a low-level fit, your partner is doubling for take-out. I’d guess he has a shape like 2=2=4=5, and your best spot must be clubs. It is irrelevant that your RHO has opened the suit – East could easily have a three-card suit. Even if he has four, your intermediates suggest you should be able to cope with any bad break easily enough.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 5 2
♥ 8 6
♦ K 4
♣ K 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Man, of all the animals, is probably the only one to regard himself as a great delicacy.
Jacques Yves Cousteau
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 7 3
♥ A K 5 2
♦ K J 7
♣ K J |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 4
♥ —
♦ 10 5 4 3
♣ 9 8 6 5 2 |
♠ Q 8 6
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ A 9 6 2
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ 5 2
♥ Q 10 7 6 4
♦ Q 8
♣ A 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥* |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦** |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Two kings or one ace
**Transfer to hearts
♠J
Your partner has set up a forcing auction (had he bid hearts at his second turn that would have been a very good hand – this is a better one). I can’t see three no-trump as being a sensible spot, so I’ll repeat my clubs and cross my fingers we have a fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9
♥ —
♦ 10 5 4 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Avoid shame but do not seek glory – nothing so expensive as glory.
Sydney Smith
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8 4
♥ K Q 10 3 2
♦ J 10
♣ Q 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7
♥ A 8
♦ K 8 5 4 3
♣ J 6 5 2 |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ J 9 7 4
♦ Q 6 2
♣ K 10 9 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 9 3
♥ 6 5
♦ A 9 7
♣ A 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
On auctions of this sort, some people play that even though the auction is game forcing, responder can limit his hand to a minimum response (say 6-8 points) with a call of two no-trump. In the absence of this agreement, simply give preference to three clubs, and let partner describe his hand further.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 2
♥ J 9 7 4
♦ Q 6 2
♣ K 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
For some cry ‘Quick’ and some cry ‘Slow’.
Alfred Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 4
♥ 9 7 6 5
♦ K 10 5 2
♣ J 10 |
♠ Q 10 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ Q 9 8 7
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K 9 6
♥ A K 8 4 3
♦ 4
♣ A Q 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♦** |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts, game forcing
**Shortness
♣J
Your two diamond call set up a game-forcing auction. In any sequence of this sort, your jump to three no-trump shows the equivalent of a strong no-trump. This means that your partner can bid on with real extras in high cards or shape. A call of two no-trump here by you would show a balanced hand, 12-14 or 18+.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ A J 6 3
♣ K 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The road to resolution lies by doubt; The next way home’s the farthest way about.
Francis Quarles
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 5 2
♥ Q 3
♦ A 7 5 2
♣ 8 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ A 9
♦ J 6 4
♣ K Q J 9 4 |
♠ 10 3
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ A 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A J 8 7 4
♥ K J 10 8 6
♦ K Q
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
You have two enticing sequences to lead from. Should you pick one of them, or lead partner’s suit, or even trump? All four options make sense, but I can’t see how there is any rush to lead spades. I can, however see how it might be necessary to go after either red suit at once. I’ll trust partner’s overcall though, and lead hearts; I’ve been wrong before, but rarely through lack of discipline.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 4
♥ J 6 3
♦ Q J 10
♣ J 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I note that there are auctions where both players only use cuebidding, some where they use Blackwood, and some where there is a mixed strategy. Could you give me some insight as to when one approach wins out over the others?
Merry Andrew, Dover, Del.
The simple answer is that Blackwood is about system, cuebidding about judgment, so the former is easier. You tend to cuebid only when you want partner to cooperate for slam with extras, or (far more commonly) when there is a danger suit, where the partnership can identify that a control in that specific suit is critical to the chances of making slam.
In fourth seat with both sides vulnerable you hold ♠ 10, ♥ K-Q, ♦ K-J-7-3-2, ♣ A-Q-9-5-3, and hear a two heart call on your right. Would you show the minors, (and if so how?) would you pass, or would you bid one of the minors? I assume double is out of the question?
Noisy Oyster, Dodge City, Kan.
I might well elect to bid one of the minors, rather than show both minors (the only way I could do that would be to bid four no-trump, since a call of two no-trump is strong and natural). There is certainly a case for bidding three clubs, but I’m not especially worried about running into a penalty double. I think bidding three diamonds caters better for further competition in the auction.
I enjoyed the deals you ran from Frank Stewart’s most recent book, but on one hand he overcalled one spade with a bid of two hearts, on a five-card suit and a minimum opener. Do you agree with the overcall? Holding five hearts would suggest a bid of two hearts, but would the possession of two doubleton minor suit queens and four spades to the queen-jack have made one no-trump a better call?
Mayday, Harrisburg, Pa.
|
I would never overcall one no-trump with a 4-5-2-2 shape, unless the hearts were so weak that I could pretend it was a four-card suit. Yes, passing an opening bid feels wrong here – so long as the hearts are really worth bidding. A one-level overcall needs far less, of course. The vulnerability and position do play a part, though, and a sixth trump would make a huge difference.
Members of our bridge club always seem keen to open two clubs with a strong hand but fewer than 20 HCP, when they have extra shape. The call may or may not be artificial. I have tried to persuade them to keep the forcing call for really good hands, but to no avail. How should I make my case?
Doc Holliday, Waterbury, Conn.
When holding a balanced hand of 18-19 points open your long suit and jump in notrumps. An opening bid of two no-trump shows 20-22. When unbalanced in the range 19-21, you normally bid your long suit, and should only open with a forcing call if you can visualize game facing a well-fitting hand of 0-4 points. You must have a long suit or possess a real two-suiter to make this call.
I had the following hand yesterday ♠ Q-9, ♥ K-7, ♦ A-K-8-4, ♣ A-J-10-8-2 and I did not know how whether to open a suit or one no-trump in fourth chair.
Mumbles, Boston, Mass.
With honor-doubletons in your short suits, it seems sensible to limit the hand at one go, and let partner know what you have at once by opening one notrump. You might miss a minor suit game, but otherwise this not only feels like the right evaluation, you also protect your doubleton honors from a lead through them.
|
June 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.
George S. Patton
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 4 2
♥ K 9 3
♦ Q J 10
♣ 8 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ Q J 10 4
♦ 9 8 6 4
♣ A K J |
♠ 7
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A 7 5 3 2
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 9 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Four spades, 6-9 HCP
♣K
They say the perfect is the enemy of the good. While you could explore for an ideal fit for a club game or slam, what is in front of your nose is a hand that should play in partscore or game in spades. You may have 17 HCP, but your honors in your short suits aren’t pulling their weight. Treat the hand as a spade invitation, by jumping to three spades. If partner cannot bid game, it won’t be a good contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 9 6 3
♥ A 2
♦ K
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
George Orwell
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 8 2
♥ Q 4 3
♦ K 7 4
♣ A K J |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 9 8 6 5
♦ Q 10 5 3 2
♣ 9 8 |
♠ 7 3
♥ K 10 7
♦ J 9 8
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 6 5
♥ A J 2
♦ A 6
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
*Game-forcing with spades
♥9
You are far too good to pass, of course. You have two sensible options: these are to overcall one no-trump, which shows a balanced 18-19, or you can double for take-out. I’m torn here; the no-trump call is more descriptive given your honor structure, but slightly more dangerous. Since I have lived (and occasionally died) by the motto “Too dangerous is no excuse” I’ll bid one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 8 2
♥ Q 4 3
♦ K 7 4
♣ A K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal saw a fine duel between declarer and the defense. Both North and South appeared to have something in hand for their bidding, and the final contract was an excellent one. But despite trumps breaking favorably there were only nine top tricks. After the lead of the club queen, declarer was threatened with losing four tricks in the minor suits via a club overruff.
South crossed the first hurdle when he ducked the club queen, thereby neatly cutting the defenders’ communications in that suit. West continued with a club to the ace, and back came a low spade. Reluctant to commit himself immediately to the club ruff, declarer first took a diamond finesse. Now East won this with the queen and subtly returned the spade 10. When the nine appeared from West, declarer decided that the spade jack rated to be to his left, so a club ruff in dummy looked safe. He unblocked the heart ace and tried to ruff his club in dummy, planning to ditch his potential fourth diamond on the heart king. East could overruff in clubs, and that was down one.
Had East not false-carded in trumps, declarer might conceivably have found the winning line of cashing the heart ace and playing two more rounds of diamonds, ending in dummy. This would work whenever diamonds split, or when the player with three trumps had long diamonds.
Overall, I think declarer followed the percentage line, since clubs certainly rated to break decently more often than diamonds – but East certainly helped push him in the wrong direction.