June 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Give all thou canst: Heaven rejects the lore Of nicely calculated less or more.
William Wordsworth
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K J
♥ A K Q
♦ A J 5 2
♣ A K 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7
♥ 10 8 6 4 2
♦ K Q 7
♣ 8 7 3 |
♠ Q 10 6 4 3 2
♥ 9 5 3
♦ —
♣ Q J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 8 5
♥ J 7
♦ 10 9 8 6 4 3
♣ 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Balanced game-force or hearts
♥4
You may only have a five-count but your hand looks to have enough extra shape in terms of club fit and spade length to be worth a shot at game. Spades rates to be easier to make than clubs, even if you have a 4-4 fit, so I would simply jump to four spades now. In this auction, unless playing Wolff signoff, all continuations are game-forcing, by the way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 4 3 2
♥ 10 5 4
♦ —
♣ Q J 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Common sense always speaks too late. …Common sense is the little man in a gray suit who never makes a mistake in addition. But it’s always somebody’s else’s money he’s adding up.
Raymond Chandler
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ —
♥ K 7 2
♦ A Q 7 4 2
♣ Q J 9 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 10 8
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ K 8
♣ 6 3 |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ 6 3
♦ J 10 9
♣ K 10 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 7 6 3
♥ A Q 9 5
♦ 6 5 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
It is tempting to redouble and go head hunting, and indeed at certain vulnerabilities that might be a sensible approach. But if the option is to make a forcing call of one spade, I prefer that route. It becomes surprisingly difficult to get these invitational hands off your chest unless you start low, and waiting around won’t make them any easier to describe.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 10 8
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ K 8
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
You can discern the face of the sky; but can you not discern the times of the times.
Book of Matthew
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 2
♥ 10 7 2
♦ Q J 8 7 6
♣ A K 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 6 5 4
♥ K J 8 3
♦ K 2
♣ 9 5 |
♠ 10 9 3
♥ A 6 4
♦ 9 5
♣ 8 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ Q 9 5
♦ A 10 4 3
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
Unpalatable as it may appear at first glance, I believe your best bet is to rebid one notrump, showing a balanced hand and simulating a heart stopper. The unattractive alternatives are to raise spades on a doubleton, which I would hate to do even if partner had promised five, and to rebid diamonds, which really ought to show six, or a far better suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 2
♥ 10 7 2
♦ Q J 8 7 6
♣ A K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Defer not till tomorrow to be wise, Tomorrow’s sun to thee may never rise.
William Congreve
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 6
♥ 8 5 4
♦ Q J 10 5
♣ A 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9
♥ 10 9 7 3
♦ A 9 8 3
♣ J 3 |
♠ Q 3
♥ J 2
♦ K 7 4 2
♣ K Q 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7 5 4 2
♥ A K Q 6
♦ 6
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
The opponents opted to play no-trump in the face of your call, but did not try to penalize you. Does that argue for leading spades? I think not; and a doubleton heart lead is hardly attractive either. Play partner for a shape such as 3=4=2=4 and lead a club, hoping to set up that suit eventually.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 4 2
♥ J 2
♦ 10 7 2
♣ J 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
After a strong no-trump opening bid, what would you recommend for an intermediate player to use for responder’s immediate actions at the three-level?
Princess Bride, Monterey, Calif.
Let’s assume the calls of two spades and two no-trump are used as transfers to clubs and diamonds respectively. One sensible option is for a call of three clubs to show both minors, invitational, and three diamonds for both minors game-forcing. Now the major-suit bids would show 5-4 in the minors either way, bidding your shortage. If you prefer three clubs to be Puppet Stayman for five-card majors, that also makes sense.
Could you comment on how one should bid over an overcall of the unusual no-trump. Does something called Unusual versus Unusual apply? And do the same methods apply after a Michaels Cuebid?
Cotton Picker, Casper, Wyo.
If the opponents show a specific pair of suits, the highest cuebid below three of partner’s suit shows a limit raise or better. So after an overcall of two notrump over one diamond, showing clubs and hearts, a cue-bid by you of three clubs would show a good hand with diamonds. Following an overcall of two no-trump over one heart, the relevant cue-bid would be three diamonds. If there is a second cuebid available, it should show at least invitational values with the fourth suit, with a direct bid of the fourth suit as non-forcing.
I am an 80 year old Life Master. I have thought for my entire bridge career that leading the ace from ace-king makes sense. What is the logic behind leading the king?
Elmer Fuddy-Duddy, Trenton, N.J.
|
This is almost a toss-up. The king works poorly in one specific position (dummy has small cards and you have jackthird/fourth and do not know whether to encourage or not). As against that, it lets you work out when to encourage on ace leads, and when to give count on king leads. So long as you know what your partnership does (and so long as you use king from ace-king in mid-hand so as to get count, ace to get attitude – which applies in bid and supported suits at trick one) that is the most important thing.
I have a question regarding a recent response you gave in the letters page. You stated that a double of an artificial raise by an unpassed hand might sensibly be played as either takeout, or showing the suit doubled. How strong does a raise have to be before the double is lead-directional rather than takeout?
Puppy Dog, Duluth, Minn.
I think any time the opponents promise an opener facing a limit raise, you do not want to get involved in the bidding except to double for a lead. If the artificial call is weak or otherwise limited, you need a take-out double of their agreed suit. I think a double of Drury should be clubs.
What sort of hand should you have for a raise of partner’s weak two to three? Would your answer change if your RHO had doubled the weak two?
Barry Cader, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
A sequence like this could be almost anything – other than strong. It could be based on a balanced 13-count, trying to tempt the opponents into the auction. Equally it could be a balanced Yarborough (taking away the cuebid raise from the opponents in case they have a game or slam on). The call is simply a bar bid – but not indicating one hand-type or another.
|
June 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Think left and think right and think low and think high. Oh, the thinks you can think up if only you try!
Dr. Seuss
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7 6
♥ J 3
♦ K Q J 10 9 8
♣ Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 6 4
♦ 3
♣ 8 5 3 |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ A Q 5
♦ A 7 4 2
♣ K J 10 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ K 7 2
♦ 6 5
♣ A 7 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Standard expert practice here is to use Crawling Stayman, to get to your best fit at the two-level. Here you can bid two clubs, planning to pass a response in a major but to bid two hearts over a response of two diamonds. This last call would show both majors and no game interest. Your partner must pass or correct two hearts to two spades with 3-2 in the majors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 9 8 6 4
♦ 3
♣ 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
And then I Formulated a Plan. And that made me feel better because there was something in my head that had an order and a pattern and I just had to follow the instructions one after the other.
Mark Haddon
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ A 7 6 2
♦ K Q 3
♣ 10 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 2
♥ K J 8 5 3
♦ J 9 8 4
♣ K 8 |
♠ K J 9
♥ Q 10 4
♦ 7 6
♣ Q 9 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 9
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ A J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣* |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Drury
♥5
You have no idea if game is the limit in spades, or if you should play a small or even a grand slam. A jump to four spades would surely end the auction. So you should cuebid four hearts, planning to raise a four spade call to five. Since a direct jump to five spades would have asked for a heart control, this sequence should simply be offering partner the chance to evaluate his hand for slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 9
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ A J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The minute you settle for less than you deserve, you get even less than you settled for.
Maureen Dowd
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ Q 8 6 5 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ K 9 4
♦ 7 3
♣ A K Q 7 2 |
♠ 8 6 5 3
♥ Q 6 3
♦ A 4
♣ J 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10
♥ A 10 5
♦ K J 10 9
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
There is room for a difference of opinion here, but in my view this sequence is natural, showing good spades and a strong hand. If your partner was strong and balanced he would double, with the red suits he has a cuebid of two clubs available, so the bid of two spades should be reserved. This being so, you should pass. With the club king in addition, you might bid two notrump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ Q 8 6 5 2
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Seldom, very seldom, does complete truth belong to any human disclosure; seldom can it happen that something is not a little disguised or a little mistaken.
Jane Austen
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 5
♥ K J 3
♦ K Q 8 7
♣ J 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 7 4 2
♥ —
♦ J 9 4 3 2
♣ 5 3 |
♠ 10 6
♥ A Q 8 6 5 2
♦ 10 6 5
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 3
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ A
♣ A K Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
This is not the moment to introduce a three-card major. Your practical choices are to bid clubs — and you could choose between the simple call and the jump – or the bid of one no-trump. For many reasons I prefer the one notrump call. This directs partner’s attention towards the most practical game, while showing scattered values and a diamond stopper. How bad can that be?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ K J 3
♦ K Q 8 7
♣ J 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 31st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It is sometimes a bit of a shock to be reminded that, in operational and practical fact, the medium is the message.
Marshall McLuhan
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A K Q J
♥ 8 3
♦ A K 7 3
♣ J 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ K J 9 5
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ Q 9 2 |
♠ 10 9 5 2
♥ A 6 4 2
♦ Q 10 2
♣ 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 7 4 3
♥ Q 10 7
♦ 9 5
♣ A K 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
The disadvantages of bidding one spade here are illusory. If partner passes, what game are you likely to miss, since most hands with scattered values and four spades will raise to two here? With all your values concentrated in two suits, this doesn’t feel like a hand where you need to commit to no-trump yet. A jump to two spades would be game forcing; you’d need a fifth diamond to make that call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J
♥ 8 3
♦ A K 7 3
♣ J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal sees a rather subtle point of spot-card reading, after North-South had done well, I thought, to get to their top spot.
North was playing the conventional style referred to as Kokish (or Birthright) where a direct rebid of two no-trump would have been non-forcing, suggesting 2224 or so. But he could show a very strong balanced hand by a twostep process after his two club opener. His precise sequence showed 28-30, and now South gambled that a six-card suit opposite might be all that was needed to make slam.
In six diamonds South received an unreadable heart spot lead, the four, which could have been from length or shortage. It would have been very easy to put all the eggs in one basket of playing for diamonds to split, by laying down the diamond ace. That way lies disaster, today. But declarer did better when he led a low trump from dummy at trick two.
West won the trick, and declarer’s first significant clue came when East pitched the spade six. West shifted to a spade, and now declarer had to decide how to get to hand to take the trump finesse. He guessed well when he decided West had heart length and spade shortage. Accordingly he won the spade ace, cashed the two top heart winners to pitch a spade, then ruffed a spade to hand. Once this stood up, the hand was over. South could draw trump with the aid of the finesse and pitch a club on dummy’s remaining spade winner.