May 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
In a recent Bid With The Aces, West dealt and bid one club. North overcalled one diamond, East passed, and South advanced with one spade. West passed and North bid two clubs, which was explained as a one round force. Does the two club bid not guarantee a fit for spades?
Puzzled in Virginia, Kansas City, Mo.
This cuebid does not guarantee a fit but is consistent with one (or else you could jump in your own suit, no-trump or the fourth suit). Still, you might have a good long diamond suit and be heading for three no-trump facing a club stopper, for example. You should respond to the cuebid by bidding no-trump, raising partner, introducing another suit, or finding any other descriptive action.
What do you consider to be the most sensible opener in third seat when holding: ♠ A-7-3-2, ♥ Q-10-7-2, ♦ J-2, ♣ A-J-9? I hated to bid a three-card suit in this position, so I tried a one heart opener, and we missed our 5-3 club fit. Do you concur in the notion that there may be tactical benefits to bidding a real suit here?
Stoney Broke, Orlando, Fla.
In third seat, it is often right to bid a lead-directing four-card major-suit, though you do not have to go out of your way to do so here. Your clubs are not terrible, your hearts not so great, and you have enough values to be able to hold your head up subsequently in the auction, So I’d make the textbook call here of one club.
Recently my opponent, as a defender, played two cards in the same suit simultaneously, and much to my surprise the director described this as a minor penalty card. This is a term I’d never come across before. What is the correct procedure when such an incident occurs?
Trapper John, Selma, Ala.
A minor penalty card stays on the table, but only has to be played at the offender’s discretion — except that you can’t play any other minor (non-honor) card in that suit instead of the penalty card. You do not have to discard it or lead it, as would be the case with a major penalty card.
|
Playing rubber bridge on the first deal of a Chicago, my hand was ♠ Q-4-2, ♥ Q-4-3-2, ♦ A-J-3-2, ♣ 9-6 I heard my partner open one diamond, and I responded one heart, which was doubled on my left. My partner raised to two hearts and I heard two spades on my right. What would you recommend now – I seem to be too good to pass?
Pushed Around, Perth Amboy, N.J.
Many people who use Support Doubles and Redoubles would play that your partner’s raise promises four trump – but not at rubber bridge, where opener could easily have only three trump. Competing for the partscore here is vital: but since you can’t risk hearts in the 4-3 fit, it feels right to bid three diamonds here, expecting this to be natural, not a game-try for hearts. A call of three clubs here would certainly be a game-try here.
Recently my partner opened two no-trump and I held: ♠ A-Q-10-7, ♥ A-6-4-2, ♦ J-7-3, ♣ 10-4. I believed that this was enough to give us good play for slam if we had a fit, so I used Stayman and my partner bid three hearts. This convinced me that the only thing necessary now was to check for aces. Is four no-trump asking for aces now? My partner said no.
Boreas, Roswell, N.M.
When you have enough high cards to put you in or close to the slam zone, then after Stayman unearths a major, a call of four notrump is quantitative, and game bids are to play. Bids in a minor are natural – four clubs is not Gerber! These bids show length in the bid minor, four cards in the other major, and slam interest. To make a slam try for partner’s major, cuebid the OTHER major as an artificial call, setting partner’s major as trump. Then four notrump is keycard from either player.
|
May 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.
H. L. Mencken
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 9 3
♥ Q 7 4
♦ Q 10 2
♣ J 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 2
♥ K 5
♦ A J 6
♣ Q 8 7 3 2 |
♠ Q J 10 6 4
♥ J 10 2
♦ K 7 4
♣ K 10 |
| South |
♠ K 5
♥ A 9 8 6 3
♦ 9 8 5 3
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠8
Even if you have shown constructive values (when playing forcing no-trump, so that the raise shows 7-10), you have a decent hand, without too much in partner’s suit. Thus, you are very suitable for defending, and would be delighted if you could persuade partner to double the opponents. Redouble to show a maximum, and then let partner decide what to do later if they run to a black suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 3
♥ Q 7 4
♦ Q 10 2
♣ J 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Boldness, and again boldness, and always boldness!
Danton
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 10 4
♥ Q 6 3
♦ A K Q 3 2
♣ 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 5
♥ J 8 4 2
♦ 9 8 5
♣ K 2 |
♠ 7 2
♥ A 9
♦ J 10 7 4
♣ A J 10 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 6 3
♥ K 10 7 5
♦ 6
♣ Q 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
Your partner has real extras in terms of shape or high cards – or both. Given that you could hardly be better and not have acted at your first turn, you can afford to cuebid two diamonds now, planning perhaps to pass a minimum call in a major or a bid of three clubs by your partner. North can jump at his next turn with real extras in context for the auction thus far.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 5
♥ J 8 4 2
♦ 9 8 5
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There are three constants in life… change, choice and principles.
Stephen Covey
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 8 7 2
♥ A 6
♦ 10 7 2
♣ J 9 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 6 4
♥ K J 8 5
♦ Q 6
♣ K 7 |
♠ A 9 5
♥ 9 7 4 3
♦ 9 8 5 3
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ Q 10 2
♦ A K J 4
♣ A Q 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
When playing negative doubles, your inclination should always be to re-open in auctions of this sort, whether holding extra values or not, so long as you are short in the opponents’ suit. Here you have both extras and short spades, making your decision an easy one. Yes, you have only three cards in the unbid major – but that should not distract you from showing your basic hand type.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ Q 10 2
♦ A K J 4
♣ A Q 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Diligence is the mother of good fortune.
Cervantes
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8
♥ Q J 6
♦ Q 9 6 5 2
♣ K Q 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 3
♥ A 8 5
♦ A 10 8
♣ J 4 |
♠ Q 4 2
♥ 9 4 2
♦ J 4
♣ 10 9 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 6 5
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ K 7 3
♣ A 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
This hand is a dead minimum for an invitational jump to two spades, but your excellent intermediates and side-four card suit offer a lot of playing strength. The call does not guarantee a fifth card in spades, so while you may technically be sub-minimum in high cards, you are certainly within range because of your spot cards and shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 9 3
♥ 8 5
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
You that are going to be married, think things can never be done too fast; but we, that are old, and know what we are about, must elope methodically, madam.
Oliver Goldsmith
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 8
♥ 10 9 7 3
♦ 9 5 4
♣ J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3
♥ K Q J 6 5
♦ J 7
♣ Q 10 7 4 |
♠ J 10 7 5
♥ A 8 4
♦ Q 10 2
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K 9 4 2
♥ 2
♦ A K 8 6 3
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
In this sequence a call of two clubs would be natural (suggesting 4-1-4-4 or 4-0-5-4 pattern and a minimum) while a jump to three clubs would be the same pattern but an extra ace. I can’t see any good reason to drive this hand to game, so I would simply invite with a call of two no-trump. Let partner make the last mistake.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4 2
♥ 2
♦ A K 8 6 3
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Knowledge can be communicated, but not wisdom. One can find it, live it, do wonders through it, but one cannot communicate and teach it.
Herman Hesse
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7 3
♥ A 6 2
♦ 8 5 4 3
♣ 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 6 2
♥ 9 5
♦ Q 9 7 2
♣ 8 5 |
♠ A 4
♥ 10 8 7 4 3
♦ J 10
♣ K 10 9 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 6
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠6
Since dummy rates to hold four spades, I would definitely not lead that suit, and a heart seems equally unattractive. So I must lead a minor and I can see equal merit in leading a club (I’d probably pick the eight to clarify my holding as best I could) or a low diamond. My partner’s failure to double a club call tips me towards the low diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 3 2
♥ Q 6 3
♦ K 5 4
♣ 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
May 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I understand that one should have a good suit to overcall at the two-level, but is that requirement increased or decreased when in sandwich seat? For example if you hold ♠ A-7-2, ♥ A-3-2, ♦ A-J-9-7-4, ♣ Q-10, and the bidding starts with one club on your left, one heart on your right, how do you stand on the issue of passing, as opposed to a double or a call of either one no-trump or two diamonds?
Weevil Empire, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
Although I normally do not use ‘too dangerous’ as an excuse, I would not try one no-trump here. With only a single stop only in both the suits bid by my opponents, a slightly off-center double (buoyed by the extra high-cards) is acceptable. Even a call of two diamonds is not out of line; when opponents cannot double you for penalties because of the ubiquity of support doubles, you can occasionally take a few liberties in this seat.
I know bridge is a timed game, more or less, so I wonder after the bidding is over and the opening lead is made, how long is declarer allowed to take (or how long should he take) to study his hand and dummy’s before play should start?
On the Clock, Pleasanton, Calif.
While we should all try not to delay the game unnecessarily, it is hard for me to criticize any reasonable length of time taken at trick one to plan the full hand. Even if as declarer or defender you imagine that your problem will come later in the hand, your opponents should not be misled if you think before playing from dummy or following suit at trick one. Third hand is not only entitled to think about the whole hand before following to trick one, it is good policy for him to do so.
Can I ask whether transfer responses to one no-trump are now considered to be part of the basic system used in Standard American? I note that sometimes transfers are annotated in your auctions, and sometimes not.
Footnote Phil, Nashville, Tenn.
|
I am aware I am sometimes inconsistent about annotating the bidding to focus on the play. My impression is that currently transfer responses to one or two no-trump are taught as part of the basic system. Even if this is not universal, I’m expecting that this is almost the first convention we would all be taught today – after Stayman but before Blackwood.
Last week my LHO opened two hearts, and my partner bid two spades. My RHO raised to three hearts, and I passed with a flat sixcount and jack-third of spades. The opponents seemed to have the balance of high cards; they might not make three hearts, we were probably not going to make three spades. When my partner doubled, I took this as penalty, because in my opinion overcaller’s doubles are not for takeout at this level. I was wrong, and we conceded 10 tricks for a zero.
Behind the Times, Portland, Ore.
Your assumption was wrong. I’d expect your RHO’s raise to be semi-preemptive and for it to be our hand as often as theirs. I’d still pass, but when partner doubled at his second turn, the rule is that there are no early low-level penalty doubles of agreed suits by opponents. When you overcall and face a passing partner, reopening doubles are take-out. So you should simply bid three spades now.
Since one of the targets of the game is to locate a 4-4 fit, which is why we have the Stayman convention, why are four-card majors not in common usage? Isn’t this often a better fit than a 5-3 fit and doesn’t playing four-card majors facilitate getting to the best strain?
Los Lobos, Natchez, Miss.
If you use four-card majors, you may find your side’s fit fast, but you often lose precision. This is because when you have three trump in response you may raise and find a 4-3 fit, or not raise and lose the fit altogether. Five-card majors provide extra information by comparison to the bid of a major in a four-card major system, but they may be less precise when you open a minor. Basically, you win some, you lose some.
|
April 30th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Its mystery (of the British monarchy) is its life. We must not let daylight in upon magic.
Walter Bagehot
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 9 7 2
♥ J
♦ K 7 3
♣ A K 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 5 3
♥ 10 8 7 6 3 2
♦ 9 8 6
♣ — |
♠ K 10 6 4
♥ A K
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ Q 9 5 4
♦ A 10 5
♣ J 9 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦* |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Game-forcing relay
♦9
Even if I didn’t play a response of two clubs by a passed hand to a third or fourth-seat major-suit opening bid as Drury, I would respond one no-trump. If your hand is not good enough to open, you should not introduce a weak five-card suit at the two-level in what is essentially a balanced hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ Q 9 5 4
♦ A 10 5
♣ J 9 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 15th, 2016
’Tis an awkward thing to play with souls, And matter enough to save one’s own.
Robert Browning
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ 3 2
♥ A K 7 4
♦ A J 4 3
♣ J 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 7 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K 10 |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ Q 8 5 3
♦ Q 2
♣ 7 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6
♥ J 10
♦ K 10 9 5
♣ A Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
It is simple, but may be a little premature to jump to three no-trump; however, what are the alternatives? You could cuebid two spades, but what are you then supposed to do if partner bids a minor? You would surely have to bid three no-trump now – and I’d be worried that this showed four hearts plus a spade stop offering a choice of games. Maybe simplest is best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6
♥ J 10
♦ K 10 9 5
♣ A Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When I saw this deal, I was reminded of “The Man Who Knew Too Much”. After all, how could anyone go down in three hearts with trumps and diamonds lying so favorably?
It was East who reported the deal, remarking that perhaps he should have pre-balanced with two spades at his second turn – but as he commented, if his partner couldn’t balance, maybe his side would do better to remain silent.
In three hearts declarer, a very skillful player, won the spade lead in his hand and led a low heart up. West, Chris Compton, ducked smoothly, a task not many defenders would have been up to. It seemed twice as likely to declarer that West had been dealt a doubleton jack or 10 in hearts than that he had begun life with the doubleton king. So South cannot be blamed too much when he inserted the heart seven on the first round. Later he crossed to dummy to led the heart queen in an attempt to pin West’s remaining honor. This maneuver is known as an intrafinesse, but today all it succeeded in doing was losing an extra trick to the now bare heart king.
Accordingly, the defenders collected two hearts, two diamonds, and one club for down one.
It occurred to me that a weaker player would never have seen the possibility of the intrafinesse and would simply have led a heart to the queen at some point. It was lucky for East-West that they were playing the deal against an expert.