April 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Poetry should surprise by a fine excess and not by Singularity.
John Keats
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ K Q 6 5 2
♣ A 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 8 6 5 3
♥ 8
♦ 10 9 7 4
♣ J |
♠ 9 7
♥ J 9 4 2
♦ 8 3
♣ Q 10 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 4
♥ K 7 6 5 3
♦ A J
♣ K 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5 NT* |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♠K
It doesn’t feel right to lead hearts – declarer might be short of entries to take a finesse in that suit. A diamond seems logical, and I’d choose the nine, since having raised the suit, partner will know I’m won’t be short there. When you have voluntarily supported your partner, as opposed to giving forced preference, you can consider leading the highest card you can afford from three or four small cards.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ J 10 2
♦ 9 6 5 4
♣ K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣ |
| 2 ♦ |
3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
April 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
Here is something I have never been able to figure out. It happens sometimes at teams or duplicate pairs that the opponents have stopped in three of a major. You are pretty sure you can make four of a minor. But if you bid on, they may bid to game and make it. What should you do – and does it matter if you are playing matchpoints or IMPs?
Faint Heart, Salinas, Calif.
Bid on; assume if the opponents stop in three of a major deliberately, they are right the first time and won’t bid four or make it, if given a second chance. On any auction where the opponents have a chance to bid game and decline to do so, you should assume they haven’t had an accident, but are aware they are short of the values to bid game.
Is there a difference between a revoke and a renege? I see both these terms used in the books, but they are never fully explained. Nor is the penalty ever set out in full, it seems.
Legal Beagle, Atlanta, Ga.
The two terms are identical. As to penalties: there is no penalty if, from the revoke tricks onwards the offending side won no more tricks. If they won only one trick on or after the revoke, the penalty is one trick. Even if they won two or more tricks after the revoke, the penalty will only be two tricks if: specifically the player who revoked (as opposed to his partner) won the revoke trick; OR the revoking player later won a trick with a card he could have played on the revoke trick. But if these penalties do not restore equity, the tournament director may adjust the score.
I picked up ♠ 7-2, ♥ J-2, ♦ A-K-J-8-7-3-2, ♣ J-4. I opened one diamond in second seat, and rebid the suit. Now my partner who held the bare diamond queen asked for aces and settled in six no-trump, making for a top board when diamonds were 3-2. Afterwards my opponents gave me grief, saying this was not worth an opening bid. I thought it was too good to pre-empt or pass on.
Bid’em Up Bosworth, East Lansing, Mich.
|
Vulnerable I might preempt, but non-vulnerable I like your choice of opening one diamond in first seat. I would never pass this hand, whatever I did, since I would want to get this suit into the action as fast as was legal.
Because I am frequently traveling, I find I cannot read your daily bridge column as regularly as I would like. Is there any daily feature on bridge (like a crossword puzzle book) that you would recommend to replace my daily reading/ playing of the card game from the newspaper?
Door-to-door Donald, Mason City, Iowa
There are many (maybe too many) books on bridge! The authors I always recommend are Mike Lawrence, Eddie Kantar, Terence Reese and Hugh Kelsey. For my daily column online, go to bridgeblogging.com.
I recently held: ♠ 7-2, ♥ J-6-4-2, ♦ Q-J-7-3-2, ♣ J-2. After my partner opened one spade, and my RHO bid two hearts, I passed. In the balancing seat, my partner doubled for take-out. What ought I to do now?
Higgs Boson, Levittown, Pa.
I frequently bid two spades with a doubleton on parallel auctions to this, if no better action seems available, but here your diamonds are too good to pass up. It looks natural to bid three diamonds — though experts might argue that the wide range of hands for your initial pass should allow you to use a call of three diamonds here as promising values. You would then have to go through two no-trump as an artificial route to show a weak hand – just as one does in Lebensohl auctions.
|
April 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Oh, call it by some better name, For friendship sounds too cold.
Thomas Moore
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 2
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ K 9
♣ A K 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 6 4 3
♥ Q
♦ Q 7 5
♣ Q J 4 |
♠ 5
♥ A 10
♦ A 10 3 2
♣ 9 8 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 7
♥ K 9 8 7 3 2
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| 2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
♠A
Your hand is worth going to game, but don’t raise directly to four spades. You should not eliminate the possibility of playing no-trump, and the best way to do that is to cuebid three diamonds (promising a fit) planning to offer the choice of games by bidding three no-trump at your next turn, and letting partner choose.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ K 9
♣ A K 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I once knew a man out of courtesy help a lame dog over a stile, and he for requital bit his fingers.
William Chillingworth
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K Q J
♦ J 10 9 4
♣ A 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 6
♥ 9 7
♦ A Q 7
♣ Q 5 4 3 |
♠ A Q 4 2
♥ 3 2
♦ 8 6 5 2
♣ 10 9 8 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ A 10 8 6 5 4
♦ K 3
♣ K J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
I can see the logic in rebidding my hearts to suggest a minimum hand unsuitable for defense. As against that, do I want to play in hearts facing shortness? I think not. I would pass and see how the auction pans out. I would certainly be prepared to sit for a penalty double, if my partner makes one – whichever suit the opponents finish in.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ A 10 8 6 5 4
♦ K 3
♣ K J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
The newspaper is a greater treasure to the people than uncounted millions of gold.
Henry Ward Beecher
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 6
♥ Q 10 9 7
♦ Q 7 6
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 5
♥ 8 6 4 3
♦ A J 9
♣ J 10 2 |
♠ A Q 10 8 3 2
♥ —
♦ 8 4
♣ 9 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A K J 5 2
♦ K 10 5 3 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
As a passed hand, if you decide you want to come into the auction, a decision I would agree with, the safest way is with a double. This suggests something close to a maximum pass and the unbid suits, plus tolerance for partner. You have nothing to spare for this call, but it will surely be your only chance to get into the auction, so you should take it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6
♥ Q 10 9 7
♦ Q 7 6
♣ K Q 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
I dislike Allegory — the conscious and intentional allegory — yet any attempt to explain the purport of myth or fairytale must use allegorical language.
J. R. R. Tolkien
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8
♥ 10 8 7
♦ K Q 10 7 6 3
♣ 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ K Q J 9 6
♦ 9 4
♣ A J 3 |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ 8 5
♣ Q 10 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 6
♥ 4
♦ A J 2
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Players get paranoid about the fact that a one club opener may be only a three-card suit. So it might – but that doesn’t mean it is. Partner normally has four, and this is especially so in third seat where a minimum opener might prefer a decent four-card major to a bad club suit. This points to the right call here being to raise to two clubs, an action I much prefer to passing or, worse, responding one no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4 2
♥ A 5 3 2
♦ 8 5
♣ Q 10 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Prepare for the worst and you won’t be disappointed.
John Connolly
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 7 2
♥ Q 8
♦ A J 8 7 5
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ A 6 5 3
♦ 9
♣ Q J 10 9 7 |
♠ J 9 4
♥ 9 7 4 2
♦ K Q 10
♣ 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ K J 10
♦ 6 4 3 2
♣ A K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣Q
Your partner’s rebid of one no-trump shows a balanced hand but does not deny four of a major. You can bid two spades to show at least a good invitation to game with four spades, and let partner decide what to do next. There is no need to jump about in the auction. By bidding diamonds before spades, you have shown a good hand – since with a one-bid hand you might have started by bidding the major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 2
♥ Q 8
♦ A J 8 7 5
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 11th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
At first, dreams seem impossible, then improbable, and eventually inevitable.
Christopher Reeve
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ A 10 6 2
♦ A 8 6
♣ A Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 7 6 3
♥ K 9 8
♦ Q J 4
♣ 9 |
♠ 8 2
♥ 7
♦ 10 7 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 4
♥ Q J 5 4 3
♦ K 9 5
♣ K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
In auctions of this sort, where partner has not overcalled, and you can lead from either shortness or a four-card suit, expert opinion is divided as to whether your chances are better of hitting a five-carder in partner by leading your long or short suit. Since you know that he has any entries for your side, I would try for the jackpot by leading a low heart.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 3
♥ Q 7 5
♦ J 9 6 2
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
In an unopposed auction I opened one diamond, my partner bid one heart, and I bid one spade. Now my partner jumped to two no-trump, and holding an 18-count I took this to be stronger than a jump to three no-trump. So I bid Blackwood and we ended up in a hopeless slam. Both my partner and the opponents, said the jump on the second round was a standard bid showing 10 or 11 points. Have I missed something all these years?
Over the Top, Denver, Colo.
In the good old days a jump to two no-trump did indeed show a better hand than a bid of three no-trump. Not any more; your partner hit the nail on the head when he described the hand as invitational to game and balanced. Incidentally, your four no-trump call over two notrump should be quantitative, and invitational to slam, not Blackwood, since no trump suit was agreed.
Why do you sanction leading second highest from three or four small cards at no-trump but dislike the same approach against a suit? And is it ever acceptable to lead high (not middle) from three or four?
Roman in the Gloaming, Little Rock, Ark.
From three small cards against a suit I believe one should lead top or bottom; I do not like playing the middle card, since I frequently fail to read the initial holding until it is too late. I lead high from a bad holding only when I have raised partner, so am unlikely to have two. Sometimes, though, the auction has made it clear that I must have length. I’m more likely to lead a higher spot when defending no-trump, since I hope my partner will infer I am not playing for a ruff…
As responder, I held ♠ A-Q-10-5-3, ♥ A, ♦ Q-J-10-9, ♣ K-7-3. My partner opened one heart and rebid two clubs. When I used the fourth suit he rebid two no-trump, suggesting 1-5-3-4 or 0-5-4-4 distribution. Would you look for higher things in diamonds now, or go low?
Felix the Cat, Holland, Mich.
|
After the rebid of two notrump it seems enough to me to bid three no-trump. You might miss a slam when both hands have a little extra, but I play that the call of two no-trump shows 12-14, so slam is a long way away. (I’d jump to three notrump with hands in the 15-17 range and 5-4 pattern, while I would raise to three diamonds with 0-5-4-4 pattern).
If I hear an overcall of four spades over my partner’s one diamond call, should my double be based on tricks, trumps, or general high-cards? I made the call with a 3-3-3-4 11-point hand. My partner left in the double, claiming it was wholly for penalties, and four spades made. Worse, we were cold for five diamonds – and I got the blame!
Cui Culpa, Saint John, New Brunswick
I won’t say you were entirely blameless here, since a lot depends on your precise agreements. I’d argue that one should use the double here as simply showing a good hand, with values that should work on offense as well as on defense, not a trump stack. Partner’s duty is to bid on with significant extra shape – which is what it sounds like he had. When you have a weak hand with trump tricks as responder, pass smoothly and await the re-opening double.
How strong do you play a balancing overcall of one no-trump? Is it closer to a strong no-trump or a weak no-trump — and what conventions should one play in response to it?
Seeking Protection, West Palm Beach, Fla.
I play this overcall to be 11-15, but more often at the lower end over a minor-suit opening bid. The reason for keeping the range less than in direct seat is that you can’t afford to let the opponents steal the contract, when you have a balanced opening bid. Equally, if you double with all good hands, partner will never know what shape you have. So use the no-trump overcall as a minimum balanced hand, double then bid no-trump with a real strong no-trump.
|
April 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The Senate is a place filled with goodwill and good intentions, and if the road to hell is paved with them, then it’s a pretty good detour.
Hubert H. Humphrey
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 4 3
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ 2
♣ K 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ 10 2
♦ K J 6 3
♣ A Q J 9 6 |
♠ J 8 7 5 2
♥ A J 5 4
♦ 9 5
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9
♥ Q 7 3
♦ A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
If you haven’t seen this auction before you might be lulled into thinking it shows a great hand with clubs. So it does – but it also guarantees four hearts and game-forcing values. So bid four no-trump, Blackwood or Keycard for hearts, planning to head to at least a small slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 4 3
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ 2
♣ K 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Bridge players learn early that in order to run their long suits they should unblock their suits by cashing the high cards in the short hand first. However, every rule has its exception, and each hand should be treated on its own merits; consider today’s deal, for example.
North-South might appear to belong in seven hearts, but the opponents’ violent preemption tipped South off to potentially bad breaks on the horizon. He offered a choice of slams at the six-level, and North sensibly settled for hearts.
When West led the spade king, declarer rose with dummy’s ace then cashed the ace and queen of trump. If hearts had broken 3-2, there would have been no problem in coming to 13 tricks, so long as diamonds broke no worse than 4-2. But now even the small slam was in trouble, because entries to dummy were so limited. After cashing the diamond ace and jack, South used his last entry, the club ace, to play the diamond king. When East ruffed in with the nine, the slam was dead, for declarer could no longer reach dummy and he had an inevitable club loser.
The route home is instead to cash the heart ace and king at tricks two and three, leaving the queen in dummy as a late entry. Then comes the diamond ace and jack. Now a heart to the queen is followed by the diamond king for a spade discard. This way the club ace still remains in place, as the entry to the rest of the diamonds for club discards.