Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 4th, 2016

Poetry should surprise by a fine excess and not by Singularity.

John Keats


N North
N-S ♠ A 2
 A Q 10
 K Q 6 5 2
♣ A 8 5
West East
♠ K Q J 8 6 5 3
 8
 10 9 7 4
♣ J
♠ 9 7
 J 9 4 2
 8 3
♣ Q 10 6 4 3
South
♠ 10 4
 K 7 6 5 3
 A J
♣ K 9 7 2
South West North East
    2 NT Pass
3 4 ♠ Pass Pass
5 NT* Pass 6 Pass
6 All pass    

*Pick a slam

♠K

Bridge players learn early that in order to run their long suits they should unblock their suits by cashing the high cards in the short hand first. However, every rule has its exception, and each hand should be treated on its own merits; consider today’s deal, for example.

North-South might appear to belong in seven hearts, but the opponents’ violent preemption tipped South off to potentially bad breaks on the horizon. He offered a choice of slams at the six-level, and North sensibly settled for hearts.

When West led the spade king, declarer rose with dummy’s ace then cashed the ace and queen of trump. If hearts had broken 3-2, there would have been no problem in coming to 13 tricks, so long as diamonds broke no worse than 4-2. But now even the small slam was in trouble, because entries to dummy were so limited. After cashing the diamond ace and jack, South used his last entry, the club ace, to play the diamond king. When East ruffed in with the nine, the slam was dead, for declarer could no longer reach dummy and he had an inevitable club loser.

The route home is instead to cash the heart ace and king at tricks two and three, leaving the queen in dummy as a late entry. Then comes the diamond ace and jack. Now a heart to the queen is followed by the diamond king for a spade discard. This way the club ace still remains in place, as the entry to the rest of the diamonds for club discards.


It doesn’t feel right to lead hearts – declarer might be short of entries to take a finesse in that suit. A diamond seems logical, and I’d choose the nine, since having raised the suit, partner will know I’m won’t be short there. When you have voluntarily supported your partner, as opposed to giving forced preference, you can consider leading the highest card you can afford from three or four small cards.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 7 4 2
 J 10 2
 9 6 5 4
♣ K 9
South West North East
    1 Dbl.
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT 2 ♣
2 3 ♣ All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 3rd, 2016

Here is something I have never been able to figure out. It happens sometimes at teams or duplicate pairs that the opponents have stopped in three of a major. You are pretty sure you can make four of a minor. But if you bid on, they may bid to game and make it. What should you do – and does it matter if you are playing matchpoints or IMPs?

Faint Heart, Salinas, Calif.

Bid on; assume if the opponents stop in three of a major deliberately, they are right the first time and won’t bid four or make it, if given a second chance. On any auction where the opponents have a chance to bid game and decline to do so, you should assume they haven’t had an accident, but are aware they are short of the values to bid game.

Is there a difference between a revoke and a renege? I see both these terms used in the books, but they are never fully explained. Nor is the penalty ever set out in full, it seems.

Legal Beagle, Atlanta, Ga.

The two terms are identical. As to penalties: there is no penalty if, from the revoke tricks onwards the offending side won no more tricks. If they won only one trick on or after the revoke, the penalty is one trick. Even if they won two or more tricks after the revoke, the penalty will only be two tricks if: specifically the player who revoked (as opposed to his partner) won the revoke trick; OR the revoking player later won a trick with a card he could have played on the revoke trick. But if these penalties do not restore equity, the tournament director may adjust the score.

I picked up ♠ 7-2, J-2, A-K-J-8-7-3-2, ♣ J-4. I opened one diamond in second seat, and rebid the suit. Now my partner who held the bare diamond queen asked for aces and settled in six no-trump, making for a top board when diamonds were 3-2. Afterwards my opponents gave me grief, saying this was not worth an opening bid. I thought it was too good to pre-empt or pass on.

Bid’em Up Bosworth, East Lansing, Mich.

Vulnerable I might preempt, but non-vulnerable I like your choice of opening one diamond in first seat. I would never pass this hand, whatever I did, since I would want to get this suit into the action as fast as was legal.

Because I am frequently traveling, I find I cannot read your daily bridge column as regularly as I would like. Is there any daily feature on bridge (like a crossword puzzle book) that you would recommend to replace my daily reading/ playing of the card game from the newspaper?

Door-to-door Donald, Mason City, Iowa

There are many (maybe too many) books on bridge! The authors I always recommend are Mike Lawrence, Eddie Kantar, Terence Reese and Hugh Kelsey. For my daily column online, go to bridgeblogging.com.

I recently held: ♠ 7-2, J-6-4-2, Q-J-7-3-2, ♣ J-2. After my partner opened one spade, and my RHO bid two hearts, I passed. In the balancing seat, my partner doubled for take-out. What ought I to do now?

Higgs Boson, Levittown, Pa.

I frequently bid two spades with a doubleton on parallel auctions to this, if no better action seems available, but here your diamonds are too good to pass up. It looks natural to bid three diamonds — though experts might argue that the wide range of hands for your initial pass should allow you to use a call of three diamonds here as promising values. You would then have to go through two no-trump as an artificial route to show a weak hand – just as one does in Lebensohl auctions.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 2nd, 2016

Oh, call it by some better name,
For friendship sounds too cold.

Thomas Moore


S North
Both ♠ J 9 2
 J 6 5 4
 K 9
♣ A K 10 6
West East
♠ A Q 10 6 4 3
 Q
 Q 7 5
♣ Q J 4
♠ 5
 A 10
 A 10 3 2
♣ 9 8 7 5 3 2
South
♠ K 8 7
 K 9 8 7 3 2
 J 8 6 4
♣ —
South West North East
Pass 1 ♠ Pass 1 NT
2 2 ♠ 3 All pass

♠A

When Zia Mahmood was relatively unknown, he honed his craft at rubber bridge and built up a reputation for originality at Stefan’s Bridge Circle in London. He has gone on to become a bridge icon, and is now universally known just as “Zia”. There are very few people in the bridge world known by a single name – perhaps an indication of his place in the pantheon of bridge.

Here is an example of his ability to pull the wool over his opponents’ eyes; why does it always seem to work for him and never for me?

He was partnering Jan Jansma of the Netherlands in the Open Pairs at the 2013 European Open Championships in Ostend, and they were disputing the lead in the final with Sabine Auken and Roy Welland; they were finally overtaken on the last few boards.

Against three hearts, West led the spade ace, under which Zia, knowing a ruff was in the offing, unhesitatingly dropped the king. This play might have cost him a trick, but seeing the jack in dummy, and believing Zia, West switched to a diamond. Zia ducked in dummy, and when East took his ace, Zia could win the diamond return with the king. That let him dispose of his losing spades on dummy’s clubs.

It was time to broach trump now. Zia played the jack from dummy and saw East’s 10. Now Zia couldn’t conceive of a player holding Q-10 and not covering. So he rose with the king, dropping the singleton queen. 10 tricks made!


Your hand is worth going to game, but don’t raise directly to four spades. You should not eliminate the possibility of playing no-trump, and the best way to do that is to cuebid three diamonds (promising a fit) planning to offer the choice of games by bidding three no-trump at your next turn, and letting partner choose.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 9 2
 J 6 5 4
 K 9
♣ A K 10 6
South West North East
  2 2 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 1st, 2016

I once knew a man out of courtesy help a lame dog over a stile, and he for requital bit his fingers.

William Chillingworth


S North
None ♠ 8 5 3
 K Q J
 J 10 9 4
♣ A 7 6
West East
♠ K J 10 6
 9 7
 A Q 7
♣ Q 5 4 3
♠ A Q 4 2
 3 2
 8 6 5 2
♣ 10 9 8
South
♠ 9 7
 A 10 8 6 5 4
 K 3
♣ K J 2
South West North East
1 Dbl. Rdbl. 1 ♠
2 Pass 3 All pass
       

♠J

Today’s deal will ask you to plan the defense to three hearts as East, after West has led the spade jack, on the auction shown.

When the deal came up in a team game, both Souths reached the delicate contract of three hearts, after a spade lead. One pair was successful on defense, one pair failed, though in the second case it was not really clear whether the defenders had done anything terribly wrong.

Both Easts came to the conclusion that the fact that their partner had led the spade jack and not a top club or diamond virtually guaranteed that declarer had to have the heart ace, a high diamond honor, and at least a decent club holding. Eventually, therefore, declarer would, if left to his own devices, come to six hearts, one club and two diamonds. So they worked out that they had to shift to a club at once.

At one table East won the spade ace and switched to the club 10, ducked round to dummy’s ace. However, when West won the first diamond, he decided to play his partner for the club king rather than the spade queen, and a club switch let claim his contract. At the second table, East found the way to put his partner on the right track by winning the spade queen at trick one and shifting to the club 10. Now West knew to play back a spade when he won the diamond queen. A second club through declarer left declarer without resource.


I can see the logic in rebidding my hearts to suggest a minimum hand unsuitable for defense. As against that, do I want to play in hearts facing shortness? I think not. I would pass and see how the auction pans out. I would certainly be prepared to sit for a penalty double, if my partner makes one – whichever suit the opponents finish in.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 7
 A 10 8 6 5 4
 K 3
♣ K J 2
South West North East
1 Dbl. Rdbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, March 31st, 2016

The newspaper is a greater treasure to the people than uncounted millions of gold.

Henry Ward Beecher


N North
Both ♠ 9 6
 Q 10 9 7
 Q 7 6
♣ K Q 6 3
West East
♠ K J 5
 8 6 4 3
 A J 9
♣ J 10 2
♠ A Q 10 8 3 2
 —
 8 4
♣ 9 8 7 5 4
South
♠ 7 4
 A K J 5 2
 K 10 5 3 2
♣ A
South West North East
    Pass 2 ♠
3 Pass 4 All pass
       

3

In this deal from a daily bulletin a decade ago the comment about the play was that at one table “Four hearts was the normal contract and declarer brought home an easy overtrick.”

It seemed to me that the defenders should have managed their three top tricks, even if finding a way to the setting trick was beyond them. Of course, at the featured table a trump was led and it was indeed easy to make 11 tricks.

However, suppose West leads an unspectacular spade five, and wins the next spade to switch to a trump. Declarer will win, unblock the club ace, draw a second trump, cross to dummy with a trump and cash his top clubs.

Suppose declarer now ruffs his last club high, reducing everyone to four cards. To keep his three diamonds and his trump, the best West can do is discard his spade. Declarer now has a complete count of the hand, knowing West has a 3-4-3-3 shape, and must decide who holds the diamond jack.

If it is East, finessing for that card is straightforward. But there is a way to succeed if West holds that card: declarer draws the last trump and leads the diamond king from hand. West must win and play another diamond, which declarer can run around to his 10. Contract made!

In order to defeat four hearts legitimately, East must arrange to be on lead after the second spade (either by winning the queen at trick one then cashing the ace, or playing the ace then queen). He can then switch to a diamond.


As a passed hand, if you decide you want to come into the auction, a decision I would agree with, the safest way is with a double. This suggests something close to a maximum pass and the unbid suits, plus tolerance for partner. You have nothing to spare for this call, but it will surely be your only chance to get into the auction, so you should take it.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 6
 Q 10 9 7
 Q 7 6
♣ K Q 6 3
South West North East
Pass 1 1 ♠ 2
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, March 30th, 2016

I dislike Allegory — the conscious and intentional allegory — yet any attempt to explain the purport of myth or fairytale must use allegorical language.

J. R. R. Tolkien


E North
N-S ♠ 8
 10 8 7
 K Q 10 7 6 3
♣ 9 7 5
West East
♠ 9 7 3
 K Q J 9 6
 9 4
♣ A J 3
♠ 5 4 2
 A 5 3 2
 8 5
♣ Q 10 6 4
South
♠ A K Q J 10 6
 4
 A J 2
♣ K 8 2
South West North East
      Pass
1 ♠ 2 Pass 3
4 ♠ All pass    

K

Goldilocks had the afternoon off from the local duplicate bridge club, so she was taking a quiet nap, when she heard the normal buzz of conversation that always accompanied the three bears return from their game.

When she asked if there were any deals that had led to more than the usual degree of dissension, Papa Bear shoved the hand record under Goldilocks’ nose, covering up all the cards except those of North and East.

On the auction shown, Papa Bear sat East. He encouraged on the opening lead of the heart king, but the play did not take long after this. South ruffed the second heart, drew trump, and claimed the balance. “I suppose a passive defense could have been right.” Said Goldilocks tactfully but inwardly she was unpersuaded.

Mama Bear butted in to say: “I overtook the heart king at trick one and shifted to a club. Declarer guessed well to duck and we held him to ten tricks.”

Before Goldilocks could enquire whether this had turned out to be a good score or a bad one for Mama Bear, Baby Bear, who had been bouncing up and down in his chair interrupted excitedly.

“I also overtook the heart king at trick one, but I shifted to the club queen at the second trick. Now whether declarer covered or ducked the trick, we had three club winners to cash, and the game had to go down.”

“Nicely done” said Goldilocks, realizing that if Baby Bear continued improving at this rate, he would soon be unbearable.


Players get paranoid about the fact that a one club opener may be only a three-card suit. So it might – but that doesn’t mean it is. Partner normally has four, and this is especially so in third seat where a minimum opener might prefer a decent four-card major to a bad club suit. This points to the right call here being to raise to two clubs, an action I much prefer to passing or, worse, responding one no-trump.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 5 4 2
 A 5 3 2
 8 5
♣ Q 10 6 4
South West North East
Pass Pass 1 ♣ 1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 29th, 2016

Prepare for the worst and you won’t be disappointed.

John Connolly


S North
N-S ♠ K Q 7 2
 Q 8
 A J 8 7 5
♣ 6 2
West East
♠ 10 8 5
 A 6 5 3
 9
♣ Q J 10 9 7
♠ J 9 4
 9 7 4 2
 K Q 10
♣ 5 4 3
South
♠ A 6 3
 K J 10
 6 4 3 2
♣ A K 8
South West North East
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 3 NT All pass

♣Q

In a good contract it is often sensible to work out what is the worst that can happen to you, then take steps to deal with that situation, should it arise.

Against three no-trump West led the club queen, and declarer thought that the best chance of making his game lay in the diamond suit, where he had a nine-card fit.

So he captured the club queen with the ace and continued with a diamond, inserting the eight from dummy. East won with the king then returned a club. Declarer ducked, won the club continuation and led another diamond. When West showed out, South played dummy’s ace then exited with another diamond. East won, and played a heart. With West having the ace, South finished with just seven tricks.

Admittedly the worst that could happen did happen, in that the diamond honors were all offside, clubs broke 5-3, and the long club hand held the heart ace. But how should South have saved the day?

The answer is that he needed to test spades first. If that suit broke 3-3, then there would have been no need to rely on the diamond suit at all. Declarer then knocks out the heart ace, and his game comes home. That is courtesy of four spades tricks, the diamond ace, and two tricks in each of hearts and clubs.

Had spades not split, declarer could have reverted to attacking diamonds, with the tempo on his side if the suit breaks. If neither suit splits, he has no realistic chance to succeed, whatever he does.


Your partner’s rebid of one no-trump shows a balanced hand but does not deny four of a major. You can bid two spades to show at least a good invitation to game with four spades, and let partner decide what to do next. There is no need to jump about in the auction. By bidding diamonds before spades, you have shown a good hand – since with a one-bid hand you might have started by bidding the major.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 7 2
 Q 8
 A J 8 7 5
♣ 6 2
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♣ Pass
1 Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 28th, 2016

At first, dreams seem impossible, then improbable, and eventually inevitable.

Christopher Reeve


W North
E-W ♠ Q 10 5
 A 10 6 2
 A 8 6
♣ A Q 6
West East
♠ A K J 7 6 3
 K 9 8
 Q J 4
♣ 9
♠ 8 2
 7
 10 7 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 5 3 2
South
♠ 9 4
 Q J 5 4 3
 K 9 5
♣ K J 4
South West North East
  1 ♠ 1 NT Pass
2 Pass 2 ♠ Pass
4 All pass    

♠K

In today’s deal North had a straightforward overcall of one no-trump over West’s one spade call. When South transferred to hearts, North decided to suggest a non-minimum with heart fit by cue-bidding two spades. South wasted no time in driving to game, and the defenders naturally went after spades at once.

The key play came early, after West led king, ace and a third spade. Declarer had to follow suit on the first two tricks, but he had the chance to be hero or villain when East ruffed the third round of spades with the heart seven.

South found the correct play of discarding a diamond on this trick. No matter how the play of the hand might have gone, South was eventually going to surrender this diamond trick. Hence it cost nothing to discard this loser at this moment.

As you can see from the full deal, South was then able to finesse through West for the heart king, and could win the rest of the tricks without difficulty.

South would have lost his vulnerable game contract if he had made the mistake of over-ruffing at the third trick. Declarer would have had to use the heart jack for this purpose, which would have left him with insufficient trump spots to pick up West’s guarded king. West could cover with the king if South led the queen, to ensure his trump trick.

Since South would have been unable to avoid losing a diamond trick as well, he would have had to concede two spades, a trump and a diamond for down one.


In auctions of this sort, where partner has not overcalled, and you can lead from either shortness or a four-card suit, expert opinion is divided as to whether your chances are better of hitting a five-carder in partner by leading your long or short suit. Since you know that he has any entries for your side, I would try for the jackpot by leading a low heart.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 10 8 3
 Q 7 5
 J 9 6 2
♣ 10 7 2
South West North East
  1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣
Pass 3 ♣ Pass 3 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 27th, 2016

In an unopposed auction I opened one diamond, my partner bid one heart, and I bid one spade. Now my partner jumped to two no-trump, and holding an 18-count I took this to be stronger than a jump to three no-trump. So I bid Blackwood and we ended up in a hopeless slam. Both my partner and the opponents, said the jump on the second round was a standard bid showing 10 or 11 points. Have I missed something all these years?

Over the Top, Denver, Colo.

In the good old days a jump to two no-trump did indeed show a better hand than a bid of three no-trump. Not any more; your partner hit the nail on the head when he described the hand as invitational to game and balanced. Incidentally, your four no-trump call over two notrump should be quantitative, and invitational to slam, not Blackwood, since no trump suit was agreed.

Why do you sanction leading second highest from three or four small cards at no-trump but dislike the same approach against a suit? And is it ever acceptable to lead high (not middle) from three or four?

Roman in the Gloaming, Little Rock, Ark.

From three small cards against a suit I believe one should lead top or bottom; I do not like playing the middle card, since I frequently fail to read the initial holding until it is too late. I lead high from a bad holding only when I have raised partner, so am unlikely to have two. Sometimes, though, the auction has made it clear that I must have length. I’m more likely to lead a higher spot when defending no-trump, since I hope my partner will infer I am not playing for a ruff…

As responder, I held ♠ A-Q-10-5-3, A, Q-J-10-9, ♣ K-7-3. My partner opened one heart and rebid two clubs. When I used the fourth suit he rebid two no-trump, suggesting 1-5-3-4 or 0-5-4-4 distribution. Would you look for higher things in diamonds now, or go low?

Felix the Cat, Holland, Mich.

After the rebid of two notrump it seems enough to me to bid three no-trump. You might miss a slam when both hands have a little extra, but I play that the call of two no-trump shows 12-14, so slam is a long way away. (I’d jump to three notrump with hands in the 15-17 range and 5-4 pattern, while I would raise to three diamonds with 0-5-4-4 pattern).

If I hear an overcall of four spades over my partner’s one diamond call, should my double be based on tricks, trumps, or general high-cards? I made the call with a 3-3-3-4 11-point hand. My partner left in the double, claiming it was wholly for penalties, and four spades made. Worse, we were cold for five diamonds – and I got the blame!

Cui Culpa, Saint John, New Brunswick

I won’t say you were entirely blameless here, since a lot depends on your precise agreements. I’d argue that one should use the double here as simply showing a good hand, with values that should work on offense as well as on defense, not a trump stack. Partner’s duty is to bid on with significant extra shape – which is what it sounds like he had. When you have a weak hand with trump tricks as responder, pass smoothly and await the re-opening double.

How strong do you play a balancing overcall of one no-trump? Is it closer to a strong no-trump or a weak no-trump — and what conventions should one play in response to it?

Seeking Protection, West Palm Beach, Fla.

I play this overcall to be 11-15, but more often at the lower end over a minor-suit opening bid. The reason for keeping the range less than in direct seat is that you can’t afford to let the opponents steal the contract, when you have a balanced opening bid. Equally, if you double with all good hands, partner will never know what shape you have. So use the no-trump overcall as a minimum balanced hand, double then bid no-trump with a real strong no-trump.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 26th, 2016

The Senate is a place filled with goodwill and good intentions, and if the road to hell is paved with them, then it’s a pretty good detour.

Hubert H. Humphrey


E North
Both ♠ A 10 4 3
 K 9 8 6
 2
♣ K 8 5 3
West East
♠ K 6
 10 2
 K J 6 3
♣ A Q J 9 6
♠ J 8 7 5 2
 A J 5 4
 9 5
♣ 4 2
South
♠ Q 9
 Q 7 3
 A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 10 7
South West North East
      Pass
2 All pass    

10

You can choose to play or defend two diamonds today. It is from last spring’s Norman Kay Platinum Pairs.

Against two diamonds West led the heart 10, to the king and ace. The club four was returned to the ace, followed by the club queen, won by the king. South led a diamond to the 10 and jack, ruffed the club return, then played the diamond ace and seven. West could win and kill dummy’s club menace, holding declarer to eight tricks.

Should East have ducked the heart king at trick one? Yes. Say declarer leads a diamond to the queen and king. Now if the defenders take their heart ruff (and who wouldn’t?), West can exit with the club ace and another club. But eventually he will be squeezed between spades and clubs, for the contract.

In fact West does better to exit with the club queen, before cashing the club ace. Declarer wins the club king and cannot play a second club, or West can kill the club menace. Instead, declarer must ruff the fourth heart back to hand. Now the black-suit squeeze will work.

The defenders’ retort is not to play for heart ruffs at all, but to shift to the club ace and club queen at trick three, locking declarer in dummy. When South ruffs a club to hand to play trump, West wins and only now takes his heart ruff. Then he can play the fourth club, to kill the squeeze.

So must the defense prevail? Not if declarer plays an unlikely heart himself at trick two – I leave the details to the reader.


If you haven’t seen this auction before you might be lulled into thinking it shows a great hand with clubs. So it does – but it also guarantees four hearts and game-forcing values. So bid four no-trump, Blackwood or Keycard for hearts, planning to head to at least a small slam.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 10 4 3
 K 9 8 6
 2
♣ K 8 5 3
South West North East
    1 ♣ Pass
1 Pass 4 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].