April 30th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Its mystery (of the British monarchy) is its life. We must not let daylight in upon magic.
Walter Bagehot
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 9 7 2
♥ J
♦ K 7 3
♣ A K 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 5 3
♥ 10 8 7 6 3 2
♦ 9 8 6
♣ — |
♠ K 10 6 4
♥ A K
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ Q 9 5 4
♦ A 10 5
♣ J 9 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦* |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Game-forcing relay
♦9
Even if I didn’t play a response of two clubs by a passed hand to a third or fourth-seat major-suit opening bid as Drury, I would respond one no-trump. If your hand is not good enough to open, you should not introduce a weak five-card suit at the two-level in what is essentially a balanced hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ Q 9 5 4
♦ A 10 5
♣ J 9 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 15th, 2016
’Tis an awkward thing to play with souls, And matter enough to save one’s own.
Robert Browning
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ 3 2
♥ A K 7 4
♦ A J 4 3
♣ J 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 7 4
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K 10 |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ Q 8 5 3
♦ Q 2
♣ 7 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6
♥ J 10
♦ K 10 9 5
♣ A Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
It is simple, but may be a little premature to jump to three no-trump; however, what are the alternatives? You could cuebid two spades, but what are you then supposed to do if partner bids a minor? You would surely have to bid three no-trump now – and I’d be worried that this showed four hearts plus a spade stop offering a choice of games. Maybe simplest is best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6
♥ J 10
♦ K 10 9 5
♣ A Q 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
You may have the universe if I may have Italy.
Giuseppe Verdi
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 8 7 6
♥ 10 9 7
♦ K Q J 10 4
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 3 2
♥ K Q J 6 5 2
♦ 6
♣ 6 5 |
♠ A Q 10 4
♥ —
♦ 5 2
♣ Q J 10 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ A 8 4 3
♦ A 9 8 7 3
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
This is a very hard hand to evaluate. If you had acethird of hearts and a singleton club I would make a splinterjump to four clubs, but this hand is simply not worth a slam try. The choice is between a very pessimistic limit raise to three spades, or an optimistic game forcing Jacoby two no-trump. I vote for going low today.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 6
♥ 10 9 7
♦ K Q J 10 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Oh to be in England, now that April’s here.
Robert Browning
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 6 4
♥ K J 7 4
♦ K 4
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 9 8 7 2
♥ 10 9 8
♦ 7 6 3
♣ K |
♠ A J
♥ 5 3
♦ Q J 9 5 2
♣ J 10 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ A 10 8
♣ A 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*14-16
♣K
With a combined maximum of eight trump between you and your partner, I don’t see that you are obliged to compete further. You certainly cannot double two spades, so pass in good tempo and hope partner can bid on with extra offence.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6 4
♥ K J 7 4
♦ K 4
♣ Q 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Money speaks sense in a language all nations understand.
Aphra Behn
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 4
♥ K J 10 7 4
♦ K J 5 2
♣ 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 8 3 2
♥ 8 6
♦ 6
♣ K 9 8 |
♠ 7 5
♥ 9 5 3
♦ Q 9 4
♣ A J 6 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ A Q 2
♦ A 10 8 7 3
♣ Q 10 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣8
For a negative double at the two-level your partner rates to have eight plus HCP with four spades, and probably no heart fit unless he has a limit raise. Even though your trump holding is not robust, you should opt to defend, since partner will typically have a doubleton diamond, and your side will surely have more than half the deck. And remember, two diamonds doubled isn’t game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 4
♥ K J 10 7 4
♦ K J 5 2
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
If a woman gets insomnia, you never know where you’re going to find her furniture the next morning. It’s primal. We have so little we can control, but we can perfect the way our room looks.
Nicole Holofcener
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ A 9 6
♦ A 9 5 4
♣ 10 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ Q 10 8 7 3
♣ J 4 |
♠ A J 9 8 5 2
♥ 5 4
♦ 2
♣ K Q 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 6
♥ K Q 10 3
♦ K J 6
♣ A 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
The four heart call was a transfer, so dummy rates to have six spades. If we are going to have a chance to beat the contract we must hope West has no more than a 10-count. We can attack with a heart lead, go passive with a diamond, or try for a club ruff. When leading into a strong hand, there is a good case for not giving away a trick, especially when we don’t seem to want ruffs. So I vote for the diamond 10.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ K J 2
♦ 10 9 6 5 2
♣ 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
When I held ♠ Q-10-7-2, ♥ A-6-4-2, ♦ Q-J-7-3, ♣ J, I heard my partner open two clubs and I could not think of any call to make but two diamonds; did I have a sensible alternative action? When my partner bid two no-trumps, how was I supposed to advance this hand now, if three clubs would be natural?
Hypothetical, Galveston, Texas
I agree with the two diamond call initially, but after your partner shows a balanced 22-24 HCP, you should continue with a Stayman three club bid — just as you would do over an opening two no-trump. If partner shows a major, you want to invite to slam (a call of five clubs would be a splinter raise of partner’s major). If your partner bids three diamonds, a quantitative four no-trump bid looks about right, or even five no-trumps, asking partner to bid suits up the line at the six level.
Will you please confirm to me whether the Flannery convention is still being used at this time or whether its time has come and gone? I teach bridge at my local center, but I did not know how to answer this question.
Market Gardener, Kenosha, Wis.
A Flannery two diamond opener shows five hearts and four spades with fewer than 16 HCP. That allows a response of one spade to one heart to show five, and a response of one no-trump may conceal four spades. After this opening, one can play either two notrump or three clubs as an enquiry about pattern and range. I still play Flannery myself but only say, 10-15 percent of experts do; and the number is in decline, I believe. The rest tend to play a weak two diamonds.
Are there any revolutionary alterations to standard bidding you would recommend? If not, I would like to propose a new bid, “Undouble”! I play at Little Rock Duplicate and three times this week my partner doubled a contract that the opponents made! We came in second on both occasions, but would have won without the doubled contracts.
Heavens to Betsy, Greenville, S.C.
|
I like it. Of course we could expand the theme; some people would like to have both a penalty double and a take-out double available to them. And some people I know can make that distinction in very subtle fashion, even without having any obviously legal way to do so…
I am wondering whether you have published any articles describing your experience with the Aces. What would be my best bet to obtain a history of the whole process of the formation and success of the Aces?
Record Keeper, Springfield, Mass.
There is a book “Play Bridge with the Aces” by Ira Corn, and both Bob Hamman’s autobiography (“At the table”) and my own “The Lone Wolff” are accurate contemporary records of how the team was formed and how it evolved.
What would you have done with the South and North cards on this pairs deal? In first seat, East opened two spades. South held: ♠ K-J-9-7-6, ♥ 4, ♦ A-7-2, ♣ A-K-10-2. If South passes, North will have to decide whether to balance holding ♠ —, ♥ K-9-7-6, ♦ Q-J-4-3, ♣ Q-J-7-6-4. Any thoughts on the best calls for both players?
Janus, Taos, N.M.
Overcalling over two spades with the South cards is very awkward (the only call that makes sense is to bid two no-trump, and I might do it, or pass smoothly hoping partner can reopen.) If you do pass, the contract might just be two spades, undoubled. However, many Norths would reopen with a double, (points, schmoints). South will then have to choose between passing, bidding no-trump, or heading towards a club game or slam. Sometimes the hands are just too hard.
|
April 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Much learning does not teach understanding.
Heraclitus
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K J 2
♥ A 8 5 2
♦ A J 9 6
♣ 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 7 5
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ 7 5 3
♣ A Q 6 |
♠ 6 3
♥ J 10 6 4
♦ 10 2
♣ J 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 4
♥ Q
♦ K Q 8 4
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
2 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
In my preferred style, the three club call is a game or slam try with hearts agreed as trump and help requested in clubs, typically based on four cards to an honor. A doubleton is a reasonable holding facing this, and your hand is well put together in terms of controls and supporting honors, so I would accept the invitation and bid four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 2
♥ A 8 5 2
♦ A J 9 6
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
That fellow seems to me to possess but one idea, and that is a wrong one.
Dr. Samuel Johnson
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ —
♥ Q J 7
♦ K 10 8 7 4 3
♣ K 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4 3
♥ A 9
♦ A 6 5 2
♣ J 7 4 3 |
♠ 8 7 2
♥ 10 5 2
♦ Q J 9
♣ A Q 9 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 9 6 5
♥ K 8 6 4 3
♦ —
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥A
While you could invite game in diamonds, the fastest route to goal is surely in no-trump. Though diamonds might on some layouts be safer, an invitational jump to two notrump gets your values across nicely, and lets your partner go in whatever direction he wants to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ A 9
♦ A 6 5 2
♣ J 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
A day can really slip by when you’re deliberately avoiding what you’re supposed to do.
Bill Watterson
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 8 7 5 2
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ A 2
♣ A 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 9 6 4
♥ 4
♦ 9 8 4 3
♣ 8 3 |
♠ A 10 3
♥ Q J 9 8
♦ 7 6
♣ K Q 6 5 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K 6 3
♦ K Q J 10 5
♣ J 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
You do not want to sell out to two diamonds, but a double would perhaps suggest club length rather than hearts. I think a simple call of two hearts should show both majors. The auction might be consistent with holding a fifth spade, but you can reasonably assume that you have a safe haven in one major or the other.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 5 2
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ A 2
♣ A 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
At the Yeh Bros Cup Teams last year, Team Ish from the USA did not set the tournament alight, but Chris Willenken of the USA and Dennis Bilde of Denmark worked some magic here – and won the bestdefended hand of the year from the International Bridge Press Association.
Against three no-trump, Bilde’s lead of the diamond nine travelled round to the queen and ace. Declarer tested clubs to find the bad news, West pitching two hearts then a diamond. Willenken now shifted to a low spade to declarer’s ace, and a heart was ducked to the jack and king.
Willenken could see the endplay looming on him. To get out of his own way, he exited with the spade 10. Declarer won in dummy, pitching a heart from his hand, and cashed the last two club winners, finishing in hand.
Willenken pitched a diamond on the first, and the spade king on the last one, which had the effect of potentially establishing the spade nine in dummy for the fourth round of the suit. However, in the four-card ending declarer could do nothing but duck a heart to East, and this squeezed dummy in the process.
West had come down to J-8 of spades and the diamond eight. So when declarer pitched a diamond from the dummy, reducing to two spades and one diamond, Willenken could exit in diamonds, to the now bare king, and West could take the last two tricks in spades. Had declarer bared dummy’s spade nine, Willenken would have led a spade to his partner to cash his two winners.