March 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
In a utilitarian age, of all other times, it is a matter of grave importance that fairy tales should be respected.
Charles Dickens
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 2
♥ A 9 8 6 3 2
♦ Q 9 7 4
♣ 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 4 3
♥ 4
♦ 8 2
♣ J 9 7 5 4 |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ J 10 7 5
♦ 10 6 5 3
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ K Q
♦ A K J
♣ A K 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
How should you evaluate this hand – should you insist on spades, and should you play partscore or game? My best guess is that we should play four spades, ignoring the club suit altogether. The best way to do that is to transfer to spades at the four-level if playing Texas transfers, or to transfer and raise if not doing so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7 4 3
♥ 4
♦ 8 2
♣ J 9 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
They always talk who never think, and who have the least to say.
Matthew Prior
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 8 5
♥ K 9
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ Q 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ Q 10 8 5 3
♦ 10 9 5 2
♣ K 10 5 |
♠ J 9 7 6
♥ A 6 2
♦ Q J 4
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A 4 3 2
♥ J 7 4
♦ A 8
♣ A J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2 ♥* |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Hearts and a minor
♥5
Partner rates to have a balanced minimum, with no more than five clubs. Since declarer rates to have four hearts, there is nothing to be gained from leading a trump to stop declarer ruffing spades in hand. I’d guess we should go passive, and since partner surely has some club length the odds favor him having honors in that suit. So I will lead a low club.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 4
♥ J 6 2
♦ Q 7 5 4
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 17 Comments
|
My partner and I have no special agreements in our 2/1 structure. When I picked up ♠ J-7-2, ♥ A-Q-6-3, ♦ A-Q-J, ♣ A-K-4 I could not respond two hearts to a one spade opener since that would promise five cards in the suit, and a call of two no-trump would promise four spades. Would four clubs be Gerber here?
Powerhouse Pete, Bristol, Va.
Most experts say Gerber applies after a jump to four clubs over an opening bid or rebid of one or two no-trump. In any event it would be highly premature here. Best is to bid two clubs and then raise spades, to let partner describe his hand cheaply. When in doubt, leave as much space as possible.
I was taken aback when a friend of mine told me about some videos she had seen which claimed to show some of the world’s top pairs cheating. Do you know anything about this, and where do the cases against such pairs currently stand?
Cutting to the Chase, Dallas, Texas
Various national federations are currently investigating three world-class pairs (another such pair has admitted past wrongdoing). The actions of the three pairs in question are reviewed here, here and here.
My partner, an expert, opened one club holding: ♠ J-7, ♥ A-Q-3, ♦ J-10, ♣ A-K-Q-10-6-4. When I responded one spade, he chose to rebid two hearts. I know that is a reverse, promising a good hand, but does not the call promise at least four hearts? Can you discuss practical alternatives here?
Using the Force, Grand Forks, N.D.
|
A reverse does indeed strongly suggest 4-5 pattern with the first bid suit longer. Your partner sensibly considered he had too much for a non-forcing jump to three clubs, and rebidding notrump without a diamond stop would have been something of a gamble. His reverse was a practical way to try to get to you to bid no-trump with an appropriate hand.
When opener opens a strong two hearts, responder bids two no-trump, and opener bids three hearts, should it be responder’s responsibility to take the hand to game? I assume the bid of two notrump cannot be passed?
Laverne and Shirley, St. Louis, Mo.
The call of two notrump is a forcing response, but suggests a minimum hand. Over that, the bid of three hearts is non-forcing and it now becomes responder’s responsibility to bid game or pass. (Normally a trick or a ruffing value should suffice to raise here).
Can you comment on the merits of leading a spade after hearing the unopposed auction; one heart – three hearts – four hearts. Your hand consists of ♠ K-10-9-2, ♥ 5-4-3, ♦ 10-5, ♣ Q-9-7-4. If you do not lead a spade, what would be your choice?
First Cut, Jackson, Tenn.
No one can tell you what will work on this hand. However, since partner took no part in the auction we probably can rule out his holding a decent long suit. I suppose my spade intermediates would push me towards leading the spade 10, but all of the sidesuits seem reasonable enough. For the record, I would prefer to lead a diamond from 10-9 doubleton but not from my actual holding.
|
March 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 12th, 2016
Most people avoid thinking if they can, some of us are addicted to thinking, but Von Neumann actually enjoyed thinking, maybe even to the exclusion of everything else.
Edward Teller
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 7 4
♥ A 10 8
♦ A J 5 4 2
♣ 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 6
♥ 6 4
♦ Q 10 7
♣ K 7 5 3 |
♠ J 5 3
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ K 6
♣ Q 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 2
♥ K Q 5 3
♦ 9 8 3
♣ A J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠10
This hand is too good just to sign off in three notrump. It feels as if it is worth an invitation to slam, but not a drive to slam. If you had a major, you could transfer to that suit and bid four no-trump (using a Texas transfer at the four level followed by four no-trump as Blackwood). With a long minor, the simplest way to show your values is a direct jump to four no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4
♥ A 10 8
♦ A J 5 4 2
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
It’s lies. It’s all lies. Some of them are just prettier than others, that’s all. People see what they think is there.
Terry Pratchett
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 8 6 5 4
♥ K Q J 5
♦ A J
♣ Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9
♥ 10 3
♦ 9 6 2
♣ A K J 10 4 2 |
♠ 10 3
♥ 8 7 6 2
♦ 10 7 5 4 3
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 7 2
♥ A 9 4
♦ K Q 8
♣ 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT* |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
*12-14
♣K
A simple call of two hearts here should be non-forcing, a jump to three hearts should be 5-5 invitational. To force to game, start with the call of two clubs. This is the New Minor forcing convention, which I recommend to everyone – one of the very few gadgets with little or no downside.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 6 5 4
♥ K Q J 5
♦ A J
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The events in our lives happen in a sequence in time, but in their significance to ourselves they find their own order the continuous thread of revelation.
Eudora Welty
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8
♥ K Q J 10 8 7 3
♦ 7 5 4
♣ Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 5
♥ 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 8
♣ J 9 8 4 |
♠ K 10 7 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 6 2
♣ 10 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ J 9 6 4 3
♥ A 6
♦ A K J 3
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Texas transfer to hearts
♥4
You have a great hand but you do not need to bid more than one spade now. It is easy to see that you need quite a bit of help from partner to make game, whether it be in diamonds, hearts, spades, or no-trump. Start by showing a good hand and let partner bid on if he has anything to say.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 6 4 3
♥ A 6
♦ A K J 3
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
When Wellington thrashed Bonaparte, as every child can tell, The House of Peers, throughout the war, did nothing in particular, And did it very well.
W. S. Gilbert
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5 2
♥ A Q J 8 5
♦ Q J 7 4
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 6 4
♥ 10 7 4
♦ 10
♣ Q J 8 3 |
♠ J 3
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ K 8 6 3 2
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8 7
♥ K
♦ A 9 5
♣ A K 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠6
Rather than bidding two diamonds, double for takeout. This allows your partner a wider choice of actions than insisting on one of your two suits. In general double tends to be the most flexible action in competitive auctions. Whenever you have decent high cards for the action you should consider doubling for take-out, assuming your hand has no clear cut direction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ A Q J 8 5
♦ Q J 7 4
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Once you can see, touch and feel your objective, all you have to do is pull back and put all your strength behind it, and you’ll hit your target every time.
Bruce Jenner
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ K 8 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ 9
♦ J 10 9 5 3
♣ A Q 10 9 |
♠ K 10 7 6
♥ 10 4 3
♦ Q 8 7 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ Q J
♥ A Q J 7 5 2
♦ A
♣ K 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
If the opponents had not raised to two hearts you might well have jumped to two spades, but in competition it doesn’t seem to me that you have enough to take this balanced hand (including a heart king of dubious worth) beyond the two-level. You’d expect partner to advance with real extras; if he doesn’t have those extras, you surely won’t make game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ K 8 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
You know, sometimes, when they say you’re ahead of your time, it’s just a polite way of saying you have a real bad sense of timing.
George McGovern
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 9 2
♥ K Q 7
♦ J 6 3
♣ A Q J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ A 9 5 2
♣ K 9 6 2 |
♠ J 7 4 3
♥ A 6 3
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 8 5
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 4
♣ 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
Clearly the lead of a black suit looks unattractive. Given that partner has virtually no high cards, are we better off leading from length or from a sequence? It is a close call but I’m going to go with leading from ace-fourth. This seems to work better when partner has four small cards, or the suit breaks evenly round the table.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ Q J 2
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
March 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
I disagreed with my partner’s decision to open the following hand with a three-club preempt in second seat non-vulnerable ♠ J-9-4-3, ♥ 9-4, ♦ 10, ♣ K-Q-J-4-3-2. Where do you stand on the issues of side major-suits, and six-card preempts, and how important is the vulnerability?
Red Menace, Elkhart, Ind.
The seat you are in is important – one needs to be more disciplined in second seat. The side four-card major, weak though it is, might dissuade me from acting either in second seat or if vulnerable. In third chair where I need to keep the opponents guessing, I’d open three clubs, and I would open in first chair non-vulnerable, but not if my spades were even slightly better (say Q-10-43). Preempting specifically in clubs with a six-card suit is often acceptable, less common with other suits.
When holding both majors, I am often torn between a double, an overcall and a Michaels cuebid of a minor-suit opener. For example with ♠ K-J-10-3-2, ♥ A-Q-9-4, ♦ 10, ♣ Q-4-2 what should you do over a one diamond opener? If you overcall, when your LHO responds one no-trump and the auction is passed back to you, would you balance, and if so with what?
Mighty Quinn, Troy, N.Y.
If you overcall one spade, and then double at your next turn this suggests your approximate values and general shape (though you could be much better). There is something to be said for doubling initially, but you lose the 5-3 spade fit that way — and occasionally a 5-2 spade fit is best. Here your proposed overcall, followed by a double, covers all the bases. A Michaels cuebid should — errors and omissions excepting — always be 5-5 pattern.
Can you give me a definition on how to use all the calls in the bid boxes? I know what bids mean but I cannot find out what the Alert, Stop, X, and XX cards stand for, and who can give an alert if they don’t understand when these calls are used. I haven’t found the answers in books – though maybe this is because they predate the bidding boxes.
June Moon, Willoughby, Ohio
|
The Alert card signals to the opponents that partner’s call has an artificial or unusual meaning. Use this for every call with what you deem to be an unexpected meaning. Whenever a player is about to skip the bidding by making a jump bid, he makes the call and leaves out the stop card for about 10 seconds. The next player is then expected to wait about 10 seconds before making any call. The X/XX cards simply represent the calls of double and redouble.
I think I understand how four-suit transfers over one no-trump work. But what does Stayman followed by a minor mean (and does it mean the same after a two no-trump opening instead of a one no-trump opener)?
Desperately Seeking Stayman, Madison, Wis.
After a one no-trump opening, Stayman followed by three of a minor shows a good hand (at least the values for game) and five plus cards in the bid minor suit, typically with a side four-card major. After a two no-trump opening you would expect the same sort of handpattern for responder; but the fact you have gone past three no-trump implies you should have at least mild slam interest.
My partner and I were discussing whether our aim should be to bid our own cards as accurately as possible and not worry about the opponents, or whether we should try and be in their faces as much as possible, and accept the bad results that occasionally come with this style. Do you have any opinion where we should be aiming on the spectrum?
Block and Tackle, Park City, Utah
At all but the very highest level you should not aim to be focusing on playing disruptive bridge. Sure, play weak jumps and weak jump raises, and open 11-counts. But accurate bridge wins; I truly believe no one ever lost a match where they and their team mates played well.
|
|
On this deal from the first qualifying session of last spring’s Silodor Open Pairs, you would really like to play seven no-trump, but the textbooks don’t cover how to bid 29-point hands — unless you are playing a relay system.
At the table where Bill Pollack was declarer, his auction saw him struggle to reach six notrump. When hearts didn’t split, even the small slam was not cold.
Fortunately for him, Pollack received the Goldilocks lead of the spade jack – a low spade lead would have handed him the contract, while he would have been sunk on any other lead. The spade lead was “just right.”
Pollack cashed the heart king and heart queen, then the diamond ace and king. The second string to his bow was a diamond break. But when that suit also failed to break, he overtook the diamond jack with dummy’s queen, and pitched a club from hand on the heart ace. On the red-suit winners West had been forced to let go one spade and two clubs.
Pollack returned to hand with a club, cashed a second high spade, then played the club king, and threw West in with a third round of clubs. That forced the defender to lead into the spade tenace of the Q-9, for a shared matchpoint top.
The winners of the Smith Life Master Women’s Pairs, Yiji Starr and Pamela Granovetter had an unlucky but enviably brief auction to the grand slam. North responded two hearts to a strong club, showing 5-7 points and a moderate heart suit and South could jump to seven hearts.