Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 27th, 2016

In an unopposed auction I opened one diamond, my partner bid one heart, and I bid one spade. Now my partner jumped to two no-trump, and holding an 18-count I took this to be stronger than a jump to three no-trump. So I bid Blackwood and we ended up in a hopeless slam. Both my partner and the opponents, said the jump on the second round was a standard bid showing 10 or 11 points. Have I missed something all these years?

Over the Top, Denver, Colo.

In the good old days a jump to two no-trump did indeed show a better hand than a bid of three no-trump. Not any more; your partner hit the nail on the head when he described the hand as invitational to game and balanced. Incidentally, your four no-trump call over two notrump should be quantitative, and invitational to slam, not Blackwood, since no trump suit was agreed.

Why do you sanction leading second highest from three or four small cards at no-trump but dislike the same approach against a suit? And is it ever acceptable to lead high (not middle) from three or four?

Roman in the Gloaming, Little Rock, Ark.

From three small cards against a suit I believe one should lead top or bottom; I do not like playing the middle card, since I frequently fail to read the initial holding until it is too late. I lead high from a bad holding only when I have raised partner, so am unlikely to have two. Sometimes, though, the auction has made it clear that I must have length. I’m more likely to lead a higher spot when defending no-trump, since I hope my partner will infer I am not playing for a ruff…

As responder, I held ♠ A-Q-10-5-3, A, Q-J-10-9, ♣ K-7-3. My partner opened one heart and rebid two clubs. When I used the fourth suit he rebid two no-trump, suggesting 1-5-3-4 or 0-5-4-4 distribution. Would you look for higher things in diamonds now, or go low?

Felix the Cat, Holland, Mich.

After the rebid of two notrump it seems enough to me to bid three no-trump. You might miss a slam when both hands have a little extra, but I play that the call of two no-trump shows 12-14, so slam is a long way away. (I’d jump to three notrump with hands in the 15-17 range and 5-4 pattern, while I would raise to three diamonds with 0-5-4-4 pattern).

If I hear an overcall of four spades over my partner’s one diamond call, should my double be based on tricks, trumps, or general high-cards? I made the call with a 3-3-3-4 11-point hand. My partner left in the double, claiming it was wholly for penalties, and four spades made. Worse, we were cold for five diamonds – and I got the blame!

Cui Culpa, Saint John, New Brunswick

I won’t say you were entirely blameless here, since a lot depends on your precise agreements. I’d argue that one should use the double here as simply showing a good hand, with values that should work on offense as well as on defense, not a trump stack. Partner’s duty is to bid on with significant extra shape – which is what it sounds like he had. When you have a weak hand with trump tricks as responder, pass smoothly and await the re-opening double.

How strong do you play a balancing overcall of one no-trump? Is it closer to a strong no-trump or a weak no-trump — and what conventions should one play in response to it?

Seeking Protection, West Palm Beach, Fla.

I play this overcall to be 11-15, but more often at the lower end over a minor-suit opening bid. The reason for keeping the range less than in direct seat is that you can’t afford to let the opponents steal the contract, when you have a balanced opening bid. Equally, if you double with all good hands, partner will never know what shape you have. So use the no-trump overcall as a minimum balanced hand, double then bid no-trump with a real strong no-trump.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 26th, 2016

The Senate is a place filled with goodwill and good intentions, and if the road to hell is paved with them, then it’s a pretty good detour.

Hubert H. Humphrey


E North
Both ♠ A 10 4 3
 K 9 8 6
 2
♣ K 8 5 3
West East
♠ K 6
 10 2
 K J 6 3
♣ A Q J 9 6
♠ J 8 7 5 2
 A J 5 4
 9 5
♣ 4 2
South
♠ Q 9
 Q 7 3
 A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 10 7
South West North East
      Pass
2 All pass    

10

You can choose to play or defend two diamonds today. It is from last spring’s Norman Kay Platinum Pairs.

Against two diamonds West led the heart 10, to the king and ace. The club four was returned to the ace, followed by the club queen, won by the king. South led a diamond to the 10 and jack, ruffed the club return, then played the diamond ace and seven. West could win and kill dummy’s club menace, holding declarer to eight tricks.

Should East have ducked the heart king at trick one? Yes. Say declarer leads a diamond to the queen and king. Now if the defenders take their heart ruff (and who wouldn’t?), West can exit with the club ace and another club. But eventually he will be squeezed between spades and clubs, for the contract.

In fact West does better to exit with the club queen, before cashing the club ace. Declarer wins the club king and cannot play a second club, or West can kill the club menace. Instead, declarer must ruff the fourth heart back to hand. Now the black-suit squeeze will work.

The defenders’ retort is not to play for heart ruffs at all, but to shift to the club ace and club queen at trick three, locking declarer in dummy. When South ruffs a club to hand to play trump, West wins and only now takes his heart ruff. Then he can play the fourth club, to kill the squeeze.

So must the defense prevail? Not if declarer plays an unlikely heart himself at trick two – I leave the details to the reader.


If you haven’t seen this auction before you might be lulled into thinking it shows a great hand with clubs. So it does – but it also guarantees four hearts and game-forcing values. So bid four no-trump, Blackwood or Keycard for hearts, planning to head to at least a small slam.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 10 4 3
 K 9 8 6
 2
♣ K 8 5 3
South West North East
    1 ♣ Pass
1 Pass 4 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 25th, 2016

Decisiveness is the one word that makes a good manager.

Lee Iacocca


E North
N-S ♠ A 7 4
 J 8 5
 10 5
♣ A K Q 6 3
West East
♠ K 8 5
 Q 4 2
 8 7 4 3
♣ J 10 8
♠ 9 2
 A K 6 3
 J 6 2
♣ 9 5 4 2
South
♠ Q J 10 6 3
 10 9 7
 A K Q 9
♣ 7
South West North East
      Pass
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 4 ♠ All pass

2

Plan the defense in today’s deal as East, when your partner leads the heart two against four spades. Your first task should be to consider the missing high cards. Since you have eight points, and dummy has 14, your partner has at most five or six points.

Could shifting to diamonds ever be necessary to beat the contract? I cannot see how. The next question is whether a low heart at trick two might ever let the contract through. There are two reasons why that seems unlikely. The first is that if partner had three or four small hearts he would might well have led a higher spot card. The second is that your partner can scarcely have the guarded spade queen and a sure diamond trick such as the ace, or declarer really does not have an opening bid at all.

East may well deduce from the auction and dummy’s strength that the best hope for the defense is to try for three hearts and a trump trick. If he believes that, he may well decide that being able to lead the 13th heart may increase his side’s chances of scoring a trump trick. Once he comes to that conclusion, he should lead a low heart at trick two. When the heart three goes to the queen, East can take the next heart with the ace and play the 13th heart. Now whether South ruffs high — when West discards — or low (when he ruffs in with the eight) West’s spade king cannot be shut out.


Bidding again is not without risk, but one hates to surrender partscores without a fight, whether at rubber, teams, or pairs. I think you are supposed to bid again, and the issue is whether to bid two diamonds, focusing on the suit quality, or double, catering to partner having real heart length. I can see both sides of this, but the suit quality (and West’s negative double) persuade me to bid diamonds.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 10 6 3
 10 9 7
 A K Q 9
♣ 7
South West North East
      1 ♣
1 ♠ Dbl. Pass 2 ♣
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, March 24th, 2016

Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength.

Eric Hoffer


S North
Both ♠ Q 10
 9 7 4
 A K Q 9 3
♣ 10 9 8
West East
♠ 9 7 6 4 2
 A Q 6
 7 5 2
♣ J 4
♠ K J 5
 8 5 3 2
 J 10 6 4
♣ Q 6
South
♠ A 8 3
 K J 10
 8
♣ A K 7 5 3 2
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 Pass
3 ♣ Pass 3 Pass
3 NT All pass    

♠4

North qualifies as a true member of the Dyspeptics Club, being one of the more naturally sarcastic and cynical players one would ever have the displeasure to meet at the table. He claims not to need an excuse, saying that until he met South, his regular partner, butter would not have melted in his mouth. But these days he has run out of sympathy for his partner, especially when South gets careless as declarer – yet again.

Today was just such an example. South had got his side to three no-trump, against which West led a fourth-highest spade. (With such good hearts, leading the seven, second highest from a weak suit, would also have made sense.)

South put in dummy’s 10, covered by the jack, and he ducked. He also ducked the spade king but won the third spade, pitching a heart from dummy. Then he played three rounds of clubs, cashed the diamond ace-kingqueen in case something nice happened, and led a heart. At that point West claimed the balance, for down two.

As North seethed, but remained silent, waiting for an opening, South unwisely provided him with one when he commented on how unfavorably the opponents’ cards had lain. What did North respond to this salvo?

All South had needed to do was to pitch a blocking club from dummy on the third spade. Now when clubs break, he has 10 winners, not seven. This line of play even succeeds if the defenders shift to hearts after two rounds of spades.


Your third-in-hand opener was correct on tactical grounds, but when partner produces the wrong response it is not easy to decide whether to improve the final contract – and if so, how. I vote for passing one spade, on the grounds that this will stop partner from shooting for the moon, and your hand rates to be approximately as playable in spades as diamonds – especially if facing five trump.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 10
 9 7 4
 A K Q 9 3
♣ 10 9 8
South West North East
    Pass Pass
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, March 23rd, 2016

If your experiment needs a statistician, you need a better experiment.

Ernest Rutherford


S North
Both ♠ J 3
 7 4
 A 8 7 6 5 3
♣ A 8 5
West East
♠ K 8 7 4 2
 3 2
 K 2
♣ J 10 9 3
♠ 10 9 6 5
 9 6 5
 Q J 10
♣ 6 4 2
South
♠ A Q
 A K Q J 10 8
 9 4
♣ K Q 7
South West North East
2 ♣ Pass 2 Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
3 NT Pass 4 ♣ Pass
4 Pass 5 NT* Pass
6 All pass    

*Pick a slam

♣J

Today’s deal is an exercise both in bidding and play. The first question is whether to open two clubs or one heart; (fie on anyone who treats it as a balanced two no-trump opener or rebid!).

If you open two clubs and then bid your hearts, your partner will bid diamonds. Now is the moment to bid three no-trump, but your partner looks with favor on his two aces, and commits the hand to slam. Naturally, when offered the choice, you will select hearts, and North has no reason to overrule you, since you might well need a spade ruff in his hand.

When the defense leads the club jack, you must make a plan at once, before playing to the first trick. The spade finesse puts all your eggs in one basket. Can you do better? Yes, if you remember one of the very few percentages I encourage everyone to have at their fingertips. The probability of the outstanding cards in a suit splitting 3-2 is just over two chances in three – much better than a straight finesse.

So win the club king at trick one, draw trump, and run the diamond nine to East. When that player wins and shifts to a spade, you rise with the ace and play the diamond ace and ruff out the diamonds, with the club ace as the entry to dummy.

Note: East might well have done better in theory to play a second club when in with the diamond king. To see why, imagine that the spade and club sevens were switched.


Not all weak hands with a six-card suit should be opened with a weak two bid. This is an example of almost the worst possible suit to open. If partner is short in diamonds, you may have plenty of tricks on defense but none on offense. Equally, you do not want partner to lead an unsupported minor honor in diamonds. So pass this hand; but you would open two diamonds if you had the diamond jack (or 10-9).

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 6 3
 7 4
 A 8 7 6 5 3
♣ A 8 5
South West North East
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 22nd, 2016

A story to me means a plot where there is some surprise. Because that is how life is – full of surprises.

Isaac Bashevis Singer


E North
None ♠ J 8 6
 6
 5 4 3
♣ A 9 6 5 4 2
West East
♠ K 10 7 4
 10 8 5
 K J 7
♣ K Q J
♠ 5
 A 9 7 4 3 2
 Q 9 8
♣ 10 8 3
South
♠ A Q 9 3 2
 K Q J
 A 10 6 2
♣ 7
South West North East
      2
2 ♠ 3 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

♣K

Do you agree with North’s raise to three spades here? I would be unable to resist temptation, but he is undeniably at the very minimum end of the range for this call.

When West leads the club king against four spades, how should you plan to come to 10 tricks? After taking the opening lead in dummy with the ace, you should lead the heart five, planning to establish discards for your slow diamond losers.

At the table East might well win and shift to diamonds, facilitating your task, but let us say he wins the heart ace to shift to his trump, a much more testing defense.

You must rise with the spade ace, to ensure you can take two ruffs in dummy, then cash the diamond ace followed by the heart king and queen, on which you throw dummy’s two remaining diamonds. At this point you can crossruff four minor-suit tricks, leaving yourself with the queen and nine of trump remaining in your hand.

You have already scored nine tricks, and when East follows to three diamonds and three clubs he is marked with an original 1=6=3=3 pattern. That lets you exit from hand with the 13th diamond. West has no choice but to ruff this trick (he has followed suit obediently to every trick till now) and must lead away from his spade king at trick 12, giving you the game-going trick with your spade queen.

The only defense to the game was an extremely unlikely opening diamond lead. If they find that against you, move on to an easier game.


The diamond and spade intermediates are just enough to tempt me to take one more call, even though it could easily be turning a plus score into a minus. A call of three hearts here shows real extras and approximately this hand pattern, letting partner decide whether to go to game – and which strain to play in.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q 9 3 2
 K Q J
 A 10 6 2
♣ 7
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
2 Pass 2 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 21st, 2016

Mathematics is the supreme judge; from its decisions there is no appeal.

Tobias Dantzig


S North
N-S ♠ K J 4
 J 9 8 4
 K 9 3
♣ A Q 9
West East
♠ 7 5
 K 6
 Q 7 6 5
♣ 10 8 6 3 2
♠ Q 10 8 6 3 2
 5 3
 2
♣ K J 7 5
South
♠ A 9
 A Q 10 7 2
 A J 10 8 4
♣ 4
South West North East
1 Pass 2 NT* Pass
3 ♣** Pass 3 Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 ♣ Pass
4 NT Pass 5 Pass
6 All pass    

*Game-forcing with heart support

**Short clubs

♣3

In today’s auction, after the Jacoby two no-trump trump raise South can show a singleton club. After this, an exchange of cuebids lets South use keycard and drive to slam.

South’s first chance for the slam is to find the trump finesse working. But this attempt fails when he wins the club ace in dummy at trick one and loses a trick to the heart king. His chances of success now hinge on locating the diamond queen.

After ruffing the second club, there is no need to play on diamonds early. Instead, South carefully tackles the black suits first. He takes the spade ace at trick four, crosses to the spade king to ruff a spade high, then leads a second trump to dummy to ruff a second club.

After eight tricks he knows that West started with only two spades and only two hearts. It is clear, therefore, that West started with a total of nine cards in clubs and diamonds. West’s opening lead was the club three; and he later led back the two, suggesting a five-card suit. But whether West is being honest or not, East has at least three clubs, so West cannot hold more than six.

If only five of West’s cards are clubs, he surely held four diamonds to begin with. If West had six, he has three diamonds. Either way, West is longer in diamonds than East.

South therefore cashes the diamond ace to take out what he presumes to be East’s singleton diamond. He can then confidently finesse through West for the diamond queen.


Where partner is known to have real length (as opposed to when he opens with a minor) you need a good reason to lead something else. You do not have that reason today – no other suit looks better than a gamble. Lead your spade, and let declarer open up the other suits.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 7
 Q 10 3 2
 Q 10 5 4
♣ J 9 6 2
South West North East
  Pass 1 ♠ Dbl.
Pass 2 ♣ Pass 2 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 20th, 2016

Holding ♠ K-10-2, A-Q-6-4-3, 10, ♣ A-Q-7-4 I opened one heart in fourth chair, and my partner responded one spade. Would you pass now, raise to two spades, or rebid two clubs? I can see a case for all of these actions, but as it happens the simple raise may be the only way to get to game in spades.

Badland Bill, Fayetteville, N.C.

Facing a passed hand I tend to raise one spade to two (or pass) with three trump and no extras. This hand is good enough that I’d bid two clubs, planning to raise spades over a preference to two hearts, a raise to three clubs, or a call of two no-trump. In each case delayed spade support would suggest extras and this shape. This hand is too good to pass one spade; six clubs could have play, facing the right nine-count!

Do you consider it is right to open a hand like this: ♠ K-10-2, A-Q-8-7-5-2, 8, ♣ J-4-3 at the one- or two-level, or to pass? What would be the factors to influence your decision?

Best Foot Forward, Washington, D.C.

I have a very clear rule, that with a suit as good suit as this one, I will either open at the one-level or two level, but I will not pass. So if you deem this hand too good for a preempt, you must open it at the one-level. Personally I’d treat this as weak two if vulnerable, but as a one-level bid if not vulnerable, regardless of position — except in fourth chair, where it is a two-heart opener.

After three passes, I held ♠ J-9-7-5, A-4 A-K-Q-7, ♣ A-6-4 and opened one diamond. When my partner bid one heart I thought I had a legitimate choice between a simple call of one spade, a jump to two spades, or a bid of two no-trump. What would be your choice, playing a relatively standard system? At the table, when I jumped to two spades my partner interpreted it as showing six diamonds and five spades. Who was off base here?

Percy in a Pickle, Miami, Fla.

A jump to two spades would be natural and game-forcing, but showing an unbalanced hand, typically with five diamonds, though a 4-1-4-4 pattern is technically possible. So this hand constitutes either a rebid of one spade or two no-trump. Put me in the latter camp. Partner should now be able to check back for spades, using the New Minor.

Why is the opening lead made face downwards?

Following the Law, Honolulu, Hawaii

The idea is two-fold. First you are trying to eliminate leads out of turn – not that this is always successful. Secondly, the player not on lead then gets a chance to ask questions about the auction without any fear that his partner might interpret those questions as loaded, or lead directing.

As a defender, I’m having trouble determining whether to split touching honors from the top or bottom. Is there a rule as to which card to play in first, second or third seat?

Off at a Tangent, Hartford, Conn.

Let’s do the easy stuff first. Lead top of a sequence on defense. When following to declarer or dummy’s lead, I’d suggest playing the lower of touching two-card sequences, but top of a three-card sequence. In third hand when trying to win the trick, play lowest of your sequence. However, when your opponents are winning the trick with a high card or trump, drop the top card of the sequence if you can afford it. Equally, when discarding, discard the top of a sequence.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 19th, 2016

Life’s like a movie: write your own ending. Keep believing, keep pretending.

Jim Henson


W North
N-S ♠ J 6 2
 9 4 3
 J 8 3 2
♣ K 6 5
West East
♠ 8 4 3
 K 8 7 5 2
 Q
♣ Q 9 3 2
♠ 10
 J 10 6
 A K 9 7 6 5
♣ J 10 7
South
♠ A K Q 9 7 5
 A Q
 10 4
♣ A 8 4
South West North East
  2 * Pass 4
4 ♠ All pass    

*Weak, five+ cards

Q

Geoff Hampson, a Canadian who has been a full time professional player in the US for 20 years, won the 2010 world teams championship in partnership with Eric Greco. Today’s deal shows Hampson at work in last spring’s Vanderbilt knockouts in New Orleans.

Hampson, South, knew that he rated to be looking at eight plus tricks in his own hand. So he could hardly bid less than four spades, but he bought an uninspiring dummy.

West led the diamond queen, and East played the five, intended as suit preference, to try to prevent his partner from shifting to a heart. (It is logical when partner knows your attitude to use spot-cards as suit preference; here at trick one West knows East has the diamond ace-king.)

West duly shifted to a club, which went to the 10 and ace. South proceeded to play six rounds of spades, and since East was forced to keep two clubs — to prevent his partner being endplayed in clubs — and the diamond ace, he could only retain two hearts.

The simple line in the five-card ending was to enter dummy with the club king and take a heart finesse. But given that West appeared to have opened a weak two-bid with a five-card suit, he was an overwhelming favorite to have the heart king. Hampson instead played East to have both the jack and 10 of hearts. He led out the heart ace followed by the queen, and now whether or not West won the trick, Hampson had his 10th winner.


The right way to describe this hand is to transfer into diamonds by your partnership methods (either two no-trump or three clubs) and then to show a singleton spade. After transferring to a minor, a new suit at the three-level shows shortage in that suit. So transfer to diamonds and bid three spades. Incidentally, if you had diamonds plus a four-card major, you would start with Stayman.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10
 J 10 6
 A K 9 7 6 5
♣ J 10 7
South West North East
    1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 18th, 2016

The feeling one has no time to get anything done provides the pressure that guarantees one does get some things done.

Alain de Botton


N North
Both ♠ K 9 7 5 4
 A
 A 7 4
♣ K 7 3 2
West East
♠ J 6
 Q J 9 7 6 3
 K 10 6 3 2
♣ —
♠ Q 10 8 3 2
 10 8
 9
♣ Q 9 8 5 4
South
♠ A
 K 5 4 2
 Q J 8 5
♣ A J 10 6
South West North East
    1 ♠ Pass
2 ♣ 3 4 ♣ Pass
5 ♣ All pass    

Q

One of the most elegant and unusual endings I have seen came up on this deal from the semifinal of the Norman Kay Platinum Pairs in Reno at last year’s Spring Nationals. Declarer was Martin Fleisher, playing with Chip Martel.

The play proceeded sensibly after the lead of the heart queen to the ace, a spade to the ace, then the diamond jack, ducked (nice defense). Now Fleisher led the diamond queen to the king and ace, ruffed by East. A heart back now would have been best, but East played a spade to dummy’s king. Fleisher cashed the club king, took the marked trump finesse, ruffed a heart in dummy and took another club finesse. As the club ace was led, declarer had reached a four-card ending.

He planned to draw East’s last trump, then play a diamond from hand, forcing West to win and give declarer the rest. But there was a snag: West could play low on the diamond five, and when dummy won the seven, the spades in dummy would be losers.

South could not cash the heart king first, or it would set up West’s remaining heart.

However, on the club ace, West came under unusual pressure. If he pitched a heart, declarer could now cash the heart king before leading a diamond, to score the one more trick he needed. And if West discarded his low diamond, he couldn’t play low on the diamond five!

So in a sense even though West wasn’t in any way forced to pitch a winning card, he was squeezed out of a loser.


To set up a game force and then to show your diamond support you must use fourth-suit forcing first. Some people play one spade as natural and forcing for one round, with two spades being game-forcing fourth suit. I prefer simply to play one spade as game forcing here.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A
 K 5 4 2
 Q J 8 5
♣ A J 10 6
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].