April 10th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
In an unopposed auction I opened one diamond, my partner bid one heart, and I bid one spade. Now my partner jumped to two no-trump, and holding an 18-count I took this to be stronger than a jump to three no-trump. So I bid Blackwood and we ended up in a hopeless slam. Both my partner and the opponents, said the jump on the second round was a standard bid showing 10 or 11 points. Have I missed something all these years?
Over the Top, Denver, Colo.
In the good old days a jump to two no-trump did indeed show a better hand than a bid of three no-trump. Not any more; your partner hit the nail on the head when he described the hand as invitational to game and balanced. Incidentally, your four no-trump call over two notrump should be quantitative, and invitational to slam, not Blackwood, since no trump suit was agreed.
Why do you sanction leading second highest from three or four small cards at no-trump but dislike the same approach against a suit? And is it ever acceptable to lead high (not middle) from three or four?
Roman in the Gloaming, Little Rock, Ark.
From three small cards against a suit I believe one should lead top or bottom; I do not like playing the middle card, since I frequently fail to read the initial holding until it is too late. I lead high from a bad holding only when I have raised partner, so am unlikely to have two. Sometimes, though, the auction has made it clear that I must have length. I’m more likely to lead a higher spot when defending no-trump, since I hope my partner will infer I am not playing for a ruff…
As responder, I held ♠ A-Q-10-5-3, ♥ A, ♦ Q-J-10-9, ♣ K-7-3. My partner opened one heart and rebid two clubs. When I used the fourth suit he rebid two no-trump, suggesting 1-5-3-4 or 0-5-4-4 distribution. Would you look for higher things in diamonds now, or go low?
Felix the Cat, Holland, Mich.
|
After the rebid of two notrump it seems enough to me to bid three no-trump. You might miss a slam when both hands have a little extra, but I play that the call of two no-trump shows 12-14, so slam is a long way away. (I’d jump to three notrump with hands in the 15-17 range and 5-4 pattern, while I would raise to three diamonds with 0-5-4-4 pattern).
If I hear an overcall of four spades over my partner’s one diamond call, should my double be based on tricks, trumps, or general high-cards? I made the call with a 3-3-3-4 11-point hand. My partner left in the double, claiming it was wholly for penalties, and four spades made. Worse, we were cold for five diamonds – and I got the blame!
Cui Culpa, Saint John, New Brunswick
I won’t say you were entirely blameless here, since a lot depends on your precise agreements. I’d argue that one should use the double here as simply showing a good hand, with values that should work on offense as well as on defense, not a trump stack. Partner’s duty is to bid on with significant extra shape – which is what it sounds like he had. When you have a weak hand with trump tricks as responder, pass smoothly and await the re-opening double.
How strong do you play a balancing overcall of one no-trump? Is it closer to a strong no-trump or a weak no-trump — and what conventions should one play in response to it?
Seeking Protection, West Palm Beach, Fla.
I play this overcall to be 11-15, but more often at the lower end over a minor-suit opening bid. The reason for keeping the range less than in direct seat is that you can’t afford to let the opponents steal the contract, when you have a balanced opening bid. Equally, if you double with all good hands, partner will never know what shape you have. So use the no-trump overcall as a minimum balanced hand, double then bid no-trump with a real strong no-trump.
|
April 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The Senate is a place filled with goodwill and good intentions, and if the road to hell is paved with them, then it’s a pretty good detour.
Hubert H. Humphrey
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 4 3
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ 2
♣ K 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ 10 2
♦ K J 6 3
♣ A Q J 9 6 |
♠ J 8 7 5 2
♥ A J 5 4
♦ 9 5
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9
♥ Q 7 3
♦ A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
If you haven’t seen this auction before you might be lulled into thinking it shows a great hand with clubs. So it does – but it also guarantees four hearts and game-forcing values. So bid four no-trump, Blackwood or Keycard for hearts, planning to head to at least a small slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 4 3
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ 2
♣ K 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Decisiveness is the one word that makes a good manager.
Lee Iacocca
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 7 4
♥ J 8 5
♦ 10 5
♣ A K Q 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 5
♥ Q 4 2
♦ 8 7 4 3
♣ J 10 8 |
♠ 9 2
♥ A K 6 3
♦ J 6 2
♣ 9 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 6 3
♥ 10 9 7
♦ A K Q 9
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
♥2
Bidding again is not without risk, but one hates to surrender partscores without a fight, whether at rubber, teams, or pairs. I think you are supposed to bid again, and the issue is whether to bid two diamonds, focusing on the suit quality, or double, catering to partner having real heart length. I can see both sides of this, but the suit quality (and West’s negative double) persuade me to bid diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 6 3
♥ 10 9 7
♦ A K Q 9
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength.
Eric Hoffer
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10
♥ 9 7 4
♦ A K Q 9 3
♣ 10 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7 6 4 2
♥ A Q 6
♦ 7 5 2
♣ J 4 |
♠ K J 5
♥ 8 5 3 2
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A 8 3
♥ K J 10
♦ 8
♣ A K 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
Your third-in-hand opener was correct on tactical grounds, but when partner produces the wrong response it is not easy to decide whether to improve the final contract – and if so, how. I vote for passing one spade, on the grounds that this will stop partner from shooting for the moon, and your hand rates to be approximately as playable in spades as diamonds – especially if facing five trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ 9 7 4
♦ A K Q 9 3
♣ 10 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
If your experiment needs a statistician, you need a better experiment.
Ernest Rutherford
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 3
♥ 7 4
♦ A 8 7 6 5 3
♣ A 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7 4 2
♥ 3 2
♦ K 2
♣ J 10 9 3 |
♠ 10 9 6 5
♥ 9 6 5
♦ Q J 10
♣ 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ A K Q J 10 8
♦ 9 4
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT* |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♣J
Not all weak hands with a six-card suit should be opened with a weak two bid. This is an example of almost the worst possible suit to open. If partner is short in diamonds, you may have plenty of tricks on defense but none on offense. Equally, you do not want partner to lead an unsupported minor honor in diamonds. So pass this hand; but you would open two diamonds if you had the diamond jack (or 10-9).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ 7 4
♦ A 8 7 6 5 3
♣ A 8 5 |
April 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A story to me means a plot where there is some surprise. Because that is how life is – full of surprises.
Isaac Bashevis Singer
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ J 8 6
♥ 6
♦ 5 4 3
♣ A 9 6 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 7 4
♥ 10 8 5
♦ K J 7
♣ K Q J |
♠ 5
♥ A 9 7 4 3 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ 10 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 3 2
♥ K Q J
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
The diamond and spade intermediates are just enough to tempt me to take one more call, even though it could easily be turning a plus score into a minus. A call of three hearts here shows real extras and approximately this hand pattern, letting partner decide whether to go to game – and which strain to play in.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 3 2
♥ K Q J
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Mathematics is the supreme judge; from its decisions there is no appeal.
Tobias Dantzig
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K J 4
♥ J 9 8 4
♦ K 9 3
♣ A Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5
♥ K 6
♦ Q 7 6 5
♣ 10 8 6 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 6 3 2
♥ 5 3
♦ 2
♣ K J 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 9
♥ A Q 10 7 2
♦ A J 10 8 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3 ♣** |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing with heart support
**Short clubs
♣3
Where partner is known to have real length (as opposed to when he opens with a minor) you need a good reason to lead something else. You do not have that reason today – no other suit looks better than a gamble. Lead your spade, and let declarer open up the other suits.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ Q 10 3 2
♦ Q 10 5 4
♣ J 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
Holding ♠ K-10-2, ♥ A-Q-6-4-3, ♦ 10, ♣ A-Q-7-4 I opened one heart in fourth chair, and my partner responded one spade. Would you pass now, raise to two spades, or rebid two clubs? I can see a case for all of these actions, but as it happens the simple raise may be the only way to get to game in spades.
Badland Bill, Fayetteville, N.C.
Facing a passed hand I tend to raise one spade to two (or pass) with three trump and no extras. This hand is good enough that I’d bid two clubs, planning to raise spades over a preference to two hearts, a raise to three clubs, or a call of two no-trump. In each case delayed spade support would suggest extras and this shape. This hand is too good to pass one spade; six clubs could have play, facing the right nine-count!
Do you consider it is right to open a hand like this: ♠ K-10-2, ♥ A-Q-8-7-5-2, ♦ 8, ♣ J-4-3 at the one- or two-level, or to pass? What would be the factors to influence your decision?
Best Foot Forward, Washington, D.C.
I have a very clear rule, that with a suit as good suit as this one, I will either open at the one-level or two level, but I will not pass. So if you deem this hand too good for a preempt, you must open it at the one-level. Personally I’d treat this as weak two if vulnerable, but as a one-level bid if not vulnerable, regardless of position — except in fourth chair, where it is a two-heart opener.
After three passes, I held ♠ J-9-7-5, ♥ A-4 ♦ A-K-Q-7, ♣ A-6-4 and opened one diamond. When my partner bid one heart I thought I had a legitimate choice between a simple call of one spade, a jump to two spades, or a bid of two no-trump. What would be your choice, playing a relatively standard system? At the table, when I jumped to two spades my partner interpreted it as showing six diamonds and five spades. Who was off base here?
Percy in a Pickle, Miami, Fla.
|
A jump to two spades would be natural and game-forcing, but showing an unbalanced hand, typically with five diamonds, though a 4-1-4-4 pattern is technically possible. So this hand constitutes either a rebid of one spade or two no-trump. Put me in the latter camp. Partner should now be able to check back for spades, using the New Minor.
Why is the opening lead made face downwards?
Following the Law, Honolulu, Hawaii
The idea is two-fold. First you are trying to eliminate leads out of turn – not that this is always successful. Secondly, the player not on lead then gets a chance to ask questions about the auction without any fear that his partner might interpret those questions as loaded, or lead directing.
As a defender, I’m having trouble determining whether to split touching honors from the top or bottom. Is there a rule as to which card to play in first, second or third seat?
Off at a Tangent, Hartford, Conn.
Let’s do the easy stuff first. Lead top of a sequence on defense. When following to declarer or dummy’s lead, I’d suggest playing the lower of touching two-card sequences, but top of a three-card sequence. In third hand when trying to win the trick, play lowest of your sequence. However, when your opponents are winning the trick with a high card or trump, drop the top card of the sequence if you can afford it. Equally, when discarding, discard the top of a sequence.
|
April 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Life’s like a movie: write your own ending. Keep believing, keep pretending.
Jim Henson
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 6 2
♥ 9 4 3
♦ J 8 3 2
♣ K 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 3
♥ K 8 7 5 2
♦ Q
♣ Q 9 3 2 |
♠ 10
♥ J 10 6
♦ A K 9 7 6 5
♣ J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9 7 5
♥ A Q
♦ 10 4
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Weak, five+ cards
♦Q
The right way to describe this hand is to transfer into diamonds by your partnership methods (either two no-trump or three clubs) and then to show a singleton spade. After transferring to a minor, a new suit at the three-level shows shortage in that suit. So transfer to diamonds and bid three spades. Incidentally, if you had diamonds plus a four-card major, you would start with Stayman.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ J 10 6
♦ A K 9 7 6 5
♣ J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The feeling one has no time to get anything done provides the pressure that guarantees one does get some things done.
Alain de Botton
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 7 5 4
♥ A
♦ A 7 4
♣ K 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 6
♥ Q J 9 7 6 3
♦ K 10 6 3 2
♣ — |
♠ Q 10 8 3 2
♥ 10 8
♦ 9
♣ Q 9 8 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ K 5 4 2
♦ Q J 8 5
♣ A J 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
To set up a game force and then to show your diamond support you must use fourth-suit forcing first. Some people play one spade as natural and forcing for one round, with two spades being game-forcing fourth suit. I prefer simply to play one spade as game forcing here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ K 5 4 2
♦ Q J 8 5
♣ A J 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
You can choose to play or defend two diamonds today. It is from last spring’s Norman Kay Platinum Pairs.
Against two diamonds West led the heart 10, to the king and ace. The club four was returned to the ace, followed by the club queen, won by the king. South led a diamond to the 10 and jack, ruffed the club return, then played the diamond ace and seven. West could win and kill dummy’s club menace, holding declarer to eight tricks.
Should East have ducked the heart king at trick one? Yes. Say declarer leads a diamond to the queen and king. Now if the defenders take their heart ruff (and who wouldn’t?), West can exit with the club ace and another club. But eventually he will be squeezed between spades and clubs, for the contract.
In fact West does better to exit with the club queen, before cashing the club ace. Declarer wins the club king and cannot play a second club, or West can kill the club menace. Instead, declarer must ruff the fourth heart back to hand. Now the black-suit squeeze will work.
The defenders’ retort is not to play for heart ruffs at all, but to shift to the club ace and club queen at trick three, locking declarer in dummy. When South ruffs a club to hand to play trump, West wins and only now takes his heart ruff. Then he can play the fourth club, to kill the squeeze.
So must the defense prevail? Not if declarer plays an unlikely heart himself at trick two – I leave the details to the reader.