May 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
First ask yourself: What is the worst that can happen? Then prepare to accept it. Then proceed to improve on the worst.
Dale Carnegie
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 9 7 5
♥ A 7 5 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ A 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ K Q J 6 2
♦ 10 5 2
♣ K J 9 8 |
♠ J 8 6 2
♥ 9 8 4
♦ 7 6
♣ 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 4
♥ 10
♦ K J 9 8 3
♣ Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♠* |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
*Two keycards plus the trump queen
♥K
This hand is far too prime to give up on slam immediately. A sensible approach is to bid three diamonds, planning to raise clubs, even if partner bids three no-trump. It is hard to imagine that five clubs isn’t cold here, so I can afford to take an indirect route, going past three no-trump. At pairs, the problem is harder.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 7 5
♥ A 7 5 3
♦ A Q 4
♣ A 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.
W. S. Gilbert
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 6
♥ K 7 3
♦ K 6 3 2
♣ Q 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 4 2
♥ 6 5 4
♦ 9 8
♣ A 7 6 3 |
♠ 10 8 3
♥ Q J 10
♦ J 10 7 5
♣ 10 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7
♥ A 9 8 2
♦ A Q 4
♣ K J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥6
It looks very tempting to drive to three no-trump immediately, which is clearly the value call on the hand. But your partner could have many diamond holdings where it would be better for him to declare the hand. I’d be tempted to cuebid two diamonds initially, and try to maneuver him into declaring the hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 6
♥ K 7 3
♦ K 6 3 2
♣ Q 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Man seeks in society comfort, use and protection.
Francis Bacon
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 7 4 3
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ K 8 6
♣ 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ K 10 8 7 3
♦ 5
♣ J 9 8 4 |
♠ A K J 10 9 6
♥ J 5
♦ 7 4 3 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ 9 4
♦ A Q J 10 9
♣ A K Q 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♠2
Go to the back of the class anyone who decided to pass on the assumption that partner was trying to defend two diamonds doubled. He has shown three hearts and real extra values, so the clearest way to get your modest extras in shape and high cards across is to bid three hearts. A three club call would perhaps suggest your clubs and hearts were switched.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 2
♥ K 10 8 7 3
♦ 5
♣ J 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
As long as there was coffee in the world, how bad could things be?
Cassandra Clare
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ —
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ K Q 10 9
♣ 10 7 6 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 5
♥ 7
♦ A 5 4
♣ J 9 3 2 |
♠ 8 6 4 3 2
♥ K 8 4
♦ 8 7 6 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ A Q J 10 9
♦ J
♣ A K Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Short spades, agreeing hearts
♠J
Standard bidding has changed here over the last 20 years. After opener’s reverse, responder must be able both to raise his partner’s suits and also to admit to a minimum response. Methods, detailed at https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Wiki/ Blackout_convention allow you to bid three diamonds and set up a force for at least one round, since you’d limit your hand with two no-trump with a really weak hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 4 3 2
♥ K 8 4
♦ A 7 6 3
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
No furniture so charming as books.
Sydney Smith
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 8 6 3
♣ Q 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 7 2
♥ 9 6
♦ K 10 9
♣ A 5 2 |
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ 4
♦ J 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 7 4 |
| South |
♠ 10 3
♥ A K J 10 7 5 3
♦ A 7
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
It looks obvious to pass with such a weak hand. But it is good bidding tactics to raise partner with a weak hand and support. Your failure to make a cuebid raise suggests strictly limited values – say, less than 9 HCP. The higher you raise, the harder you make it for the opponents to get together in a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 8 6 3
♣ Q 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
What each man does is based not on certain and direct knowledge but on pictures made by himself or given to him.
Walter Lippmann
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 6
♥ A K Q 5
♦ Q 10 9 4 2
♣ Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 4 2
♦ A K 6 5
♣ K 9 7 6 3 2 |
♠ A 10 8 7 4
♥ 7 6
♦ J 8 7
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
♠ J 9 5 2
♥ J 10 9 8 3
♦ 3
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
3 ♣ |
| 3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
Since your partner is guaranteed to hold three spades, dummy rates to have three spades, and relatively short hearts. Declarer will have four spades and a weak hand, so you want to avoid taking finesses for declarer. My instinct is to lead trumps and prevent declarer from scoring his spades singly.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 3
♥ Q 10 8 3
♦ Q 8 2
♣ Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
In an intermediate-caliber Club Pairs game my partner dealt himself: ♠ A-2, ♥ 5-3, ♦ A-K-J-7, ♣ K-Q-10-9-4. What is this hand worth on opening bid, and how do you plan to rebid after a major-suit response?
Chock Full o’Nuts, Macon, Ga.
The combination of a 5-4-2-2 pattern and a small doubleton, coupled with an easy way to show extras, makes this a ‘no-contest’. Open one club and rebid two diamonds over either major-suit response or over a response of one no-trump. You could easily persuade me to open one no-trump, if you switched round the heart five and club king.
When responding to a no-trump with a long major I’ve been accustomed to transferring at the two level, then jumping to game. Is this best, or is a treatment someone recommended to me, of Texas Transfers, a sounder idea?
Dump Truck, Great Falls, Mont.
In a strong no-trump base it might certainly make sense to use direct four-level transfers to the majors with no slam interest, or when about to follow up with an ace-ask, having set the major as trump. Meanwhile, a two-level transfer followed by a raise to game is a mild slam-try with a six-card suit, while a two-level transfer if followed by four no-trump is quantitative not Blackwood. And for the record, a transfer and jump to the four level in a new suit is a self-agreeing splinter. This also applies to a transfer to spades followed by a jump in hearts.
At a recent session of rubber bridge we had quite a few throwins/all pass. During the postmortem it was observed that we rarely see or hear about this by experts (probably because such hands don’t make the highlight reel). My question is, how common is this in an expert game?
No Bid for Bacon, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
These days in third or fourth seat it sometimes seems that 11-counts are opened as a matter of routine by most (though not by me, but I’m getting old). My view is that I open in third with a decent suit or moderate values. In fourth seat if my partner has passed nonvulnerable and I have 10/11 without spades, I may well pass. But I don’t pass 12-counts that often.
A multiple part question for you. At pairs you hear a minor-suit preempt to your left passed round to you. You hold: ♠ A-8-2, ♥ A-5-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-9-4. Would you ever balance over a preempt in clubs or diamonds at the three-level… or over a two diamond preempt? Would the vulnerability affect your choice?
Truly Scrumptious, Winston Salem, N.C.
Since I would act over a one-level minor opening in direct or balancing seat (with a double in direct seat or a balancing notrump in fourth seat) I feel as if I am almost bound to reopen, probably by doubling. If my opponents are non-vulnerable it would seem only right to pass if RHO is trapping or I’m turning a minus into a plus. And yet…I might have to read my RHO’s table-action to give you my answer. Neither doubling nor passing could be crimed.
With both sides vulnerable you hold ♠ K, ♥ J-8, ♦ K-Q-9-8-3-2, ♣ A-Q-J-2. After one spade to your left, raised to two, you bid three diamonds and hear three spades to your left. Would you bid again? And if you do act, how do you rate double, four clubs, or even three no-trump for the minors?
Pat the Dog, Sioux Falls, S.D.
Pass feels wrong, so I would act; but double guarantees heart length, so that is out. Thus the choice is reduced to four clubs or three no-trump, which in my book would show diamonds with secondary clubs. That looks too good to be true, doesn’t it? But I don’t see the catch — unless you think three no-trump is to play. I do not.
|
May 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
What I want is men who will support me when I am in the wrong.
Lord Melbourne
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ J 8 5 2
♦ K Q J 7
♣ K 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ 9
♦ 10 8 6 5 4
♣ 10 9 8 4 |
♠ K
♥ A K Q 10 7 4 3
♦ A 3 2
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 9 7 6 5
♥ 6
♦ 9
♣ A Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥9
You might pass, hoping the opponents stop in three spades. In reality, though, the opponents are about to bid (and will be favorites to make) four spades. But if you can persuade your partner to lead a diamond, you might well beat this contract. The best way to do so is to bid four diamonds now, meaning this as a heart fit with lead-directing values in diamonds. As a passed hand, this must show heart fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ J 8 5 2
♦ K Q J 7
♣ K 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Many things happen between the cup and the lip.
Robert Burton
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 3
♥ Q 10 8
♦ 7 6 2
♣ A K Q 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ 7 5 3 2
♦ Q J 10 8
♣ 8 3 |
♠ K J 8 2
♥ 6 4
♦ K 9 3
♣ J 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 7
♥ A K J 9
♦ A 5 4
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
Your chances of making game in a major suit may not be good, but it would be somewhat cowardly to pass out one diamond here, and raising diamonds or bidding no-trump is certainly unattractive. I’d risk introducing hearts, hoping partner can come again. A cuebid of two clubs is a plausible if aggressive alternative.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 7
♥ A K J 9
♦ A 5 4
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don’t have brains enough to be honest.
Benjamin Franklin
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 5
♥ 10 4 3 2
♦ A K 7 2
♣ K Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ 8
♦ Q 9 8 4 3
♣ J 10 8 5 4 |
♠ A Q 10 9 4
♥ Q J 5
♦ 10 6
♣ A 9 7 |
| South |
♠ J 8 6 2
♥ A K 9 7 6
♦ J 5
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
If I had to guess, I would expect partner (who has made a take-out double then showed extras), to have one spade, and that while we might beat four spades on heart ruffs, we will come close to making a minor-suit game. So I think it is right (especially at teams or rubber) to bid four no-trump to get partner to pick a minor.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 3
♥ 8
♦ Q 9 8 4 3
♣ J 10 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
4 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The auction in today’s deal saw North taking control when his partner showed extra values and an unbalanced hand. He was looking for the grand slam, but when his partner bid six diamonds in response to his ask of five no-trump, it showed the diamond king while denying the club king. Now North could only count 12 tricks unless his partner had the spade jack, so he settled for the small slam.
West led the heart king to the ace. Before reading on, you might consider what you would do, bearing in mind that if trumps broke 3-2 you would have tricks coming out of your ears.
At the table South took the essential first step of ruffing a heart with the spade four. Then he played off the spade ace and king, getting the bad news. Now dummy’s trump spots came into their own.
South next led a diamond to the ace, took another heart ruff with the spade queen – thereby stripping the East hand of hearts, he knew, because of West’s overcall. Then declarer led a diamond to the queen, and advanced the spade 10 to drive out East’s jack, throwing the club four from hand. He could win the club return in dummy with the ace, draw the last trump with the spade nine, throwing his club queen from hand in the process. His three high diamonds in hand were enough to take the last three tricks. Contract made.
As you will discover, if you do not ruff a heart at trick two, the slam cannot be made.