March 9th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I’ve tested life and I’ve learned what works for me.
Joe Namath
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ Q J 9 6 2
♦ K 9 7
♣ 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 6 4 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ 3 2
♣ A Q 8 |
♠ A 10 7
♥ K 8 3
♦ Q 10 8 6 5
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
♠ K 5
♥ A 10
♦ A J 4
♣ K J 10 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
You could belong in either minor or in no-trump. Fortunately you do not have to take an immediate decision. Bid two hearts, a forcing call showing extras, planning to raise diamonds at your next turn. While slam may make, even facing a passed hand, let partner describe his assets before committing yourself.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ A 10
♦ A J 4
♣ K J 10 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Full many a flower is born to blush unseen, And waste its sweetness on the desert air.
Thomas Gray
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 7
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 8 7 4 2
♣ J 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ J 4
♦ A Q J 3
♣ A K Q 8 4 |
♠ Q J 10 8 2
♥ 7 2
♦ 10 6 5
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 6 4
♥ A K Q 10 8 3
♦ K 9
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*A weak hand
♣K
In competition I think responder’s suit rebid should not be forcing, since he had a cuebid available to show extras. But I think you have just enough to raise to three hearts, invitational. If you were confident partner was weak, passing would certainly be reasonable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 3
♥ J 4
♦ A Q J 3
♣ A K Q 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Truth is stranger than fiction but not so popular.
Anonymous
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 8 2
♥ J 10 7 4
♦ 6 2
♣ A 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9
♥ A 6 2
♦ 9 4
♣ Q J 10 5 |
♠ 6 5 4
♥ 5
♦ A Q J 10 7
♣ K 9 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 7 3
♥ K Q 9 8 3
♦ K 8 5 3
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♥* |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
*Hearts and a minor
♠Q
The choice from between a diamond, heart and spade is not an easy one. While you know partner has at least three spades, leading from a broken suit like this could easily cost a trick. Despite the fact that RHO has bid the suit, I think the heart jack is more likely to establish tricks for your side – after all, partner almost surely has four hearts, since he doesn’t have four spades.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4 3
♥ J 10 2
♦ Q J 4
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
Is it right to play “system on” over a no-trump overcall, using the same methods as over a notrump opening bid? If not, what would you recommend? And what about the sequences after we double the opponent’s weak notrump for penalty?
Night of the Hunter, Palm Springs, Calif.
For ease of memory it seems logical to me to try to play the same methods in as many positions as is feasible. While you could tinker with your methods because the opponents have bid a suit, it is really not worth it. Any method you know completely is better than a superior method about which you are less than confident.
You just ran a deal where a balanced 19-count opened a minor and got to four spades from the weaker hand, when it would have been easier his way up. Are there some patented methods you would be prepared to divulge to get the strong hand as declarer with the balanced 18-19 counts?
Protect the Field, Vancouver, British Columbia
A current expert trend seems to be that pairs play one of the opening bids of two clubs or two diamonds as a balanced hand of 18-19HCP. I am not sure the gains outweigh the losses for this approach. I think the way to go in the future may be to use transfer responses to a potentially short one club opener. (The one club bid shows a balanced 12-14 or 1819, or just a regular hand with short clubs). You can read more here.
I’ve been playing keycard Blackwood with some success, but am a little vague about jumps to four no-trump when no suit is explicitly agreed. Are there exceptions to the rule that it should be played as agreeing the last-bid suit?
Dick Dastardly, Ketchikan, Alaska
|
What you stated is a good simple rule – not best but simple. One exception might come when the auction gets high fast – such as the unopposed sequence: one spade – two diamonds – three clubs. Here you should raise before using keycard, since a direct jump to four no-trump should be quantitative, a better hand than a three no-trump bid.
Why do computer deals always seem to produce freak hands? Do the authorities eliminate the balanced hands from the sets they use?
Don’t Fear the Reaper, Raleigh, N.C.
It can be demonstrated conclusively that computers are set up to produce hands precisely in accordance with the mathematical percentages. Individual sets may look odd, but that isn’t the point. It is poor manual shuffling that exposes you to flatter hands than you should be receiving. In other words, it is your perception that is at fault, not the computer.
If you play an opening bid of one no-trump to show 12-14 points, as we do, having been born in the UK, when we rebid one no-trump to show 15-17 points, should we alert it?
Following the Rules, Bremerton, Wash.
Yes, I think you should. The meaning will be unexpected to those who would assume it to be 12-14 points, unless you specifically tell them. Any time you make a conventional call, or a natural call with an unexpected meaning, it can hardly do any harm to alert your opponents to what it means. Too many alerts are better than too few.
|
March 5th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
A story to me means a plot where there is some surprise. Because that is how life is – full of surprises.
Isaac Bashevis Singer
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 10
♥ K 5 2
♦ 4
♣ A K 6 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ Q J 10
♦ J 9 7 6 5
♣ J 9 8 2 |
♠ 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
♥ —
♦ A 10 8 3 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ A 9 8 7 6 4 3
♦ K Q
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
Had the opponents bid and raised your singleton you could double to get both red suits into play; but not here. Equally, you could double with 4-6 in hearts and clubs; but not here. Simplest is sometimes best – repeat your clubs, expecting partner to have at least club tolerance, since he is relatively short in spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10
♥ K 5 2
♦ 4
♣ A K 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more deadly in the long run.
Mark Twain
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 9 5 2
♥ A 6 2
♦ 5
♣ 9 6 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8
♥ Q 10 9 5
♦ Q J 10 3
♣ J 7 |
♠ 4
♥ 8 4
♦ 9 8 7 6 4 2
♣ K Q 10 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ K J 7 3
♦ A K
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
Playing inverted minors, your three diamond call was weak, suggesting 3-7 or so, and five plus diamonds. Three hearts from your partner shows at least the values for a gametry, and in context you now have enough to bid four clubs, showing values in that suit. You should not be ashamed of your hand, in context.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ 8 4
♦ 9 8 7 6 4 2
♣ K Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 3rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Intellectual disgrace Stares from every human face.
W. H. Auden
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 3
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ A J 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8 4
♥ 9 7 6 4 3
♦ A 8 4
♣ 10 3 |
♠ 10 9 7 2
♥ 8 5 2
♦ K 6
♣ Q 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 5
♥ Q J
♦ Q 10 5 2
♣ K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♦* |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Forcing, with diamond support
♥4
I’m often asked what to open with 4-4 in the minors and 12-14 points. My rule is that I bid the better minor, because if I end up defending and partner is on lead, I want him to lead my better suit. Many people will quote you hands where one minor works better than the other – but they miss the point. It is basically a wash: sometimes one suit works, sometimes the other, but good suits never go out of style.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ A K 10
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ A J 9 4 |
March 2nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A careless shepherd makes an excellent dinner for a wolf.
Earl Derl Biggers
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ Q J 10 7
♥ J 5 2
♦ K Q J 8
♣ A 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 6
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 6 2
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ K 9 8 7
♦ 10 7 4 3
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ K 4 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ A 9 5
♣ 9 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
You are fairly and squarely in the middle of the range for your initial response, of 6-10, and you have no real fit for either of your partner’s suits. The choice seems to be between a call of two no-trump and three notrump, since a three-club rebid might suggest a sub-minimum hand with long clubs. I’ll settle for the two no-trump call, but give me the diamond 10 and I might go high not low.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 6
♥ 6 4 3
♦ 6 2
♣ K J 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 1st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Look in the almanac; find out moonshine, find out moonshine.
William Shakespeare
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9 2
♥ A K Q 10
♦ K J 8
♣ A Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8 5 3
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ 8 |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 8 7
♦ 6 3
♣ J 10 7 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 10 9 4 2
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
If the two no-trump call was natural, we’d simply raise to three no-trump. If two no-trump in the modern-style is a relay to three clubs facing normal values, the Lebensohl convention, usually based on a weak one-suiter, we must cue bid three spades now to show our extras. We hope to reach three no-trump facing a spade stopper. If partner doesn’t have one, we’ll have to play his suit at the four level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 2
♥ A K Q 10
♦ K J 8
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 29th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Pigeons on the grass alas.
Gertrude Stein
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ J
♦ K 7 5 2
♣ A Q 9 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ A 10 8 3 2
♦ 10 9
♣ 6 4 |
♠ Q 6 3
♥ K 7 4
♦ 8 6 4
♣ K 10 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 5
♥ Q 9 6 5
♦ A Q J 3
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
Does responder’s Stayman sequence promise four spades? If not, then I would lead a spade, of course. If dummy rates to have shown four spades, I’ll go passive with a diamond lead. The six may be easier to read than the three, since a low card might suggest real length or an honor, or both.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4 3
♥ A 9 6
♦ 6 4 3
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal comes from the Gold Coast pairs, held in Brisbane last February. The first round of the evening featured two of the top seeds taking on one another. Zoli Nagy declared the first deal, and the defenders had the chance to make him find a nice play.
David Lilley as North had already done well for his side by stopping low. Nagy won Matt Mullamphy’s spade lead in hand (Ron Klinger accurately putting in the 10) and returned the suit, ducking West’s nine. After some thought, Mullamphy exited with a third spade.
Nagy ruffed away the ace, then led a diamond to the king, and a club to the jack and queen. Mullamphy returned a diamond, and Nagy won in hand, cashed the heart ace, and played a top diamond. Mullamphy ruffed, and had reached a five-card ending where dummy had four trumps and a losing club left.
Mullamphy chose the simple line of cashing the club ace and playing a spade, but declarer could ruff high and lead out a top trump, losing just one trump trick further, for plus 110.
Had Mullamphy played a winning spade before cashing the club ace, declarer would have needed to discard dummy’s club, rather than ruffing in. Were he to ruff low, East would obtain a cheap overruff. If declarer were to ruff high in dummy, East would discard a diamond. Then, when in with the heart king, East could put his partner in with the club ace for a fifth spade, to promote the heart eight to the setting trick.