March 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
You know, sometimes, when they say you’re ahead of your time, it’s just a polite way of saying you have a real bad sense of timing.
George McGovern
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 9 2
♥ K Q 7
♦ J 6 3
♣ A Q J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ A 9 5 2
♣ K 9 6 2 |
♠ J 7 4 3
♥ A 6 3
♦ Q 10 8 7
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 8 5
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 4
♣ 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
Clearly the lead of a black suit looks unattractive. Given that partner has virtually no high cards, are we better off leading from length or from a sequence? It is a close call but I’m going to go with leading from ace-fourth. This seems to work better when partner has four small cards, or the suit breaks evenly round the table.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ Q J 2
♣ A Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
March 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
I disagreed with my partner’s decision to open the following hand with a three-club preempt in second seat non-vulnerable ♠ J-9-4-3, ♥ 9-4, ♦ 10, ♣ K-Q-J-4-3-2. Where do you stand on the issues of side major-suits, and six-card preempts, and how important is the vulnerability?
Red Menace, Elkhart, Ind.
The seat you are in is important – one needs to be more disciplined in second seat. The side four-card major, weak though it is, might dissuade me from acting either in second seat or if vulnerable. In third chair where I need to keep the opponents guessing, I’d open three clubs, and I would open in first chair non-vulnerable, but not if my spades were even slightly better (say Q-10-43). Preempting specifically in clubs with a six-card suit is often acceptable, less common with other suits.
When holding both majors, I am often torn between a double, an overcall and a Michaels cuebid of a minor-suit opener. For example with ♠ K-J-10-3-2, ♥ A-Q-9-4, ♦ 10, ♣ Q-4-2 what should you do over a one diamond opener? If you overcall, when your LHO responds one no-trump and the auction is passed back to you, would you balance, and if so with what?
Mighty Quinn, Troy, N.Y.
If you overcall one spade, and then double at your next turn this suggests your approximate values and general shape (though you could be much better). There is something to be said for doubling initially, but you lose the 5-3 spade fit that way — and occasionally a 5-2 spade fit is best. Here your proposed overcall, followed by a double, covers all the bases. A Michaels cuebid should — errors and omissions excepting — always be 5-5 pattern.
Can you give me a definition on how to use all the calls in the bid boxes? I know what bids mean but I cannot find out what the Alert, Stop, X, and XX cards stand for, and who can give an alert if they don’t understand when these calls are used. I haven’t found the answers in books – though maybe this is because they predate the bidding boxes.
June Moon, Willoughby, Ohio
|
The Alert card signals to the opponents that partner’s call has an artificial or unusual meaning. Use this for every call with what you deem to be an unexpected meaning. Whenever a player is about to skip the bidding by making a jump bid, he makes the call and leaves out the stop card for about 10 seconds. The next player is then expected to wait about 10 seconds before making any call. The X/XX cards simply represent the calls of double and redouble.
I think I understand how four-suit transfers over one no-trump work. But what does Stayman followed by a minor mean (and does it mean the same after a two no-trump opening instead of a one no-trump opener)?
Desperately Seeking Stayman, Madison, Wis.
After a one no-trump opening, Stayman followed by three of a minor shows a good hand (at least the values for game) and five plus cards in the bid minor suit, typically with a side four-card major. After a two no-trump opening you would expect the same sort of handpattern for responder; but the fact you have gone past three no-trump implies you should have at least mild slam interest.
My partner and I were discussing whether our aim should be to bid our own cards as accurately as possible and not worry about the opponents, or whether we should try and be in their faces as much as possible, and accept the bad results that occasionally come with this style. Do you have any opinion where we should be aiming on the spectrum?
Block and Tackle, Park City, Utah
At all but the very highest level you should not aim to be focusing on playing disruptive bridge. Sure, play weak jumps and weak jump raises, and open 11-counts. But accurate bridge wins; I truly believe no one ever lost a match where they and their team mates played well.
|
March 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 5th, 2016
Confession is good for the soul only in the sense that a tweed coat is good for dandruff — it is a palliative rather than a remedy.
Peter de Vries
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 9 6
♥ K 9 8 7 6
♦ A 9
♣ 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 4
♥ A Q J 3
♦ 10 8 6 3 2
♣ K |
♠ 7 5 3 2
♥ 10 4
♦ K J
♣ 9 8 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10
♥ 5 2
♦ Q 7 5 4
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
Hands of this sort present an awkward problem. Should you go high or low, and what strain should you select? My opinion is that if you play the probabilities, partner is likely to hold 12-14 HCP and you have no eight-card fit. So this all argues for going low by bidding one notrump. Partner will move with shape and extras; if he passes, you rate to have no game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 6
♥ K 9 8 7 6
♦ A 9
♣ 10 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 18th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.
Nils Bohr
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 9 8 7
♥ J 4 3
♦ K J 6 3
♣ A Q |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6 5 4 3
♥ 10
♦ A 8 4
♣ J 10 9 2 |
♠ 10
♥ K Q 9 6 2
♦ Q 9 7
♣ 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A 8 7 5
♦ 10 5 2
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Three-card heart support
♣J
Your partner is not cuebidding for spades. He has a rock-crusher with clubs. Your hand is very suitable for higher things, so you must not pass now. I’m not sure if it best to cuebid five hearts, raise to six clubs, or whether you can risk five diamonds as an unequivocal cuebid for clubs. I’d choose between five hearts and six clubs based on my estimate of partner’s declarer play skill and his natural optimism.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5 4 3
♥ 10
♦ A 8 4
♣ J 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
3 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 17th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Chiefly the mold of a man’s fortune is in his own hands.
Francis Bacon
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 9 7
♥ J 10 9 3
♦ A Q 6
♣ A 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 8 4 2
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
♠ 8 6 5 4
♥ A K 7
♦ K J 7
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 3
♥ Q 8
♦ 9 5 3
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣10
It would be sadistic to leave your partner in one no-trump doubled with a Yarborough. Some people play ‘system on’ after this double. If you do, so that a call of two clubs would be Stayman, you might consider using redouble here as a rescue to a minor. Partner bids two clubs, and you pass or correct to two diamonds. If you play natural rescues, I would advocate running to two clubs initially.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 8 4 2
♣ 10 9 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 16th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Common sense is calculation applied to life.
Henri Amiel
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 6 4
♥ 8 5
♦ 5 4 2
♣ K 10 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 5
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ A K Q J 6
♣ Q 4 |
♠ J 3
♥ K Q 10 4 3
♦ 9 3
♣ 9 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 7 2
♥ A 6
♦ 10 8 7
♣ A J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
While you’d prefer to have six hearts to insist on playing the major facing a one notrump response, circumstances may alter cases. Here your solid heart holding suggests that facing almost any doubleton, hearts will play better than no-trump. Your hand may be virtually worthless at no-trump unless partner has the heart ace. And even facing a singleton honor, you’d like to play hearts, wouldn’t you?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 3
♥ K Q 10 4 3
♦ 9 3
♣ 9 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 15th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Surely your gladness need not be the less for the thought that you will one day see a brighter dawn than this.
Lewis Carroll
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 8 7 4 2
♥ K J
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ 7 5 2
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ A 8 5 3 |
♠ A
♥ 9 8 6 4
♦ K 5 4 2
♣ 7 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 5 3
♥ A Q 10 3
♦ A 6
♣ Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
Your hand offers virtually no prospects for slam. Should you bid three no-trump, transfer into spades, or use Stayman? Put my vote in the third category, since a 5-3 spade fit might be the only game that won’t make here. You have enough high cards to be relatively sure that three no-trump will be safe, but a 5-4 spade fit might still be best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 4 2
♥ K J
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 14th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Every advantage in the past is judged in the face of the final issue.
Demosthenes
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ K J 10
♦ K 8 6
♣ K J 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 3 2
♥ A 6 4
♦ —
♣ Q 9 8 3 2 |
♠ 8
♥ 8
♦ A Q J 10 9 7 4 2
♣ A 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J
♥ Q 9 7 5 3 2
♦ 5 3
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♦ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
You could not be overly criticized for a diamond lead, but I’m instinctively drawn to the spade lead. My partner appears to have spades sitting over dummy, and I could easily imagine that a spade lead might produce a trump promotion for my jack. Meanwhile, a diamond lead might allow declarer to get a ruff in dummy.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4
♥ K 10 7 4 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 13th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I passed in first chair seat with both sides vulnerable, and heard my LHO open two spades, which was then passed back to me. Would it have been right to pass, double or bid a suit, looking at: ♠ 10-2, ♥ A-3, ♦ J-10-7-3, ♣ A-Q-6-5-4?
Safe Haven, Newport News, Va.
I would not feel like passing, because of my relatively short spades, but a double might result in partner bidding too many hearts. I go for a call of two notrump, surely for the minors, as a passed hand, as opposed to a three-club call… if partner takes my bid as natural, which he shouldn’t, no great harm will have been done.
Can you tell me how signals are supposed to work and what are the messages the defenders are supposed to send?
Zazzy, Union City, Tenn.
Signaling is the play by a defender to tell your partner what you have or to advise him what to play. A simple signaling system incorporates attitude — high spot cards say “like” low ones say “dislike” — and count (high for even, low for an odd number of cards). And finally for the advanced player, you can signal suit preference. When your cards can’t win a trick, or a continuation is impractical, your cards may tell partner which suit you like. Suits rank in order: spades, hearts, diamonds then clubs. Visit the BridgeBase forums for more details.
If you play the forcing no-trump in response to the opening bid of a major, should you extend this treatment to play it by a passed hand?
Keeping it Open, Worcester, Mass.
The logic of the forcing no-trump is to allow responder to make that call with hands up to and including balanced invitations, or forces to game. Once you pass, you do not have to worry about the no-trump call concealing forcing hands or hands with trump support. So opener should treat the response of one no-trump as nonforcing, and pass unless he has extra shape or high cards.
|
Several times over the years you have recommended opening two clubs with at least 5/4 or 4/5 in the majors rather than opening at the one-level and risk getting passed out. In a recent article you were dealing with this hand ♠ A-Q-J-6-2, ♥ Q-9-6-4, ♦ A-K, ♣ A-4. Since game might make opposite king-fourth in hearts, shouldn’t I open two clubs here?
Flaming Lips, Houston, Texas
Consider that a hand with an ace in response will almost always keep the bidding open. And all six-counts respond to an opening bid. Since kingfourth of hearts on its own won’t make game that good, I open one spade without any worries. But let me change the hand to make it a two-club bid. How about ♠ K-Q-J-6-2, ♥ A-Q-J-4, ♦ A-K-4, ♣ 4? Now I might make game facing as little as the diamond queen and four small hearts.
Should one open one no-trump with a five-card major? If so, is there any suit so strong that you would rather opt to bid it and not one no-trump when you have 15-17 points?
Drawing the Line, Naples, Fla.
With a balanced 17 points (5332 shape) and a five-card major, I generally open the suit and treat my hand as 18-19 points. With a bad major (only one top honor) and 15-16 points I normally open one no-trump. However, if all my points are in two suits, I may opt for bidding the major; and 5-4-2-2 pattern with a long major is NOT balanced.
|
March 12th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Never revisit the past, that’s dangerous. You know, move on.
Robert Redford
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ —
♥ K J 4 3
♦ A 9 5 4 3
♣ A K 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 7
♥ 9 2
♦ K Q 10 8
♣ 10 4 |
♠ A 6 5
♥ A Q 8
♦ J 6 2
♣ Q J 9 8 |
| South |
♠ K 8 4 3 2
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ 7
♣ 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♠* |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT** |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
*Spades and a 4+card minor
**Demanding a call of three clubs
♠Q
When partner has promised only four or more hearts, should we raise with a balanced hand, or rebid one no-trump and ignore the feebleness of our diamond stopper? I opt for the notrump rebid, assuming that if LHO has good long diamonds we may hear from him again, to take us off the hook. And we can compete over two diamonds to two hearts, describing our hand to perfection.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 5
♥ A Q 8
♦ J 6 2
♣ Q J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
North has enough to drive to game when South opens the bidding. He cannot afford to raise spades immediately, since that would not be forcing, so he bids his clubs first. When South rebids his spades, North can simply bid four spades, assuming that his decent trump intermediates will solidify the spade suit.
After West leads the heart jack to trick one, South covers, and wins the next heart in dummy. He should now see that he needs a successful club finesse to make his game. He must therefore plan on the assumption that the club finesse will work. If it loses, he may go down two tricks instead of only one, but the additional undertrick is a fine investment to improve his chances of making game.
If South draws trump, even assuming that they break, and takes a club finesse, he will then have to find a way of getting back to his hand for a second finesse. How can he get back? He cannot do so unless the diamond finesse succeeds; and why risk this unnecessarily?
The solution is to use the trump more efficiently as a means of communication. Declarer leads the trump 10 to the ace at trick three, then abandons trump in order to take a club finesse. He next leads the trump nine to the king and observes West’s discard. He takes a second club finesse, and only then can he draw the last trump by means of the finesse against the jack. This leaves him in position for the third and final club finesse.