Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, March 7th, 2016

You know, sometimes, when they say you’re ahead of your time, it’s just a polite way of saying you have a real bad sense of timing.

George McGovern


S North
None ♠ 10 9 2
 K Q 7
 J 6 3
♣ A Q J 10
West East
♠ 6
 J 10 9 8
 A 9 5 2
♣ K 9 6 2
♠ J 7 4 3
 A 6 3
 Q 10 8 7
♣ 7 4
South
♠ A K Q 8 5
 5 4 2
 K 4
♣ 8 5 3
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ All pass
       

J

North has enough to drive to game when South opens the bidding. He cannot afford to raise spades immediately, since that would not be forcing, so he bids his clubs first. When South rebids his spades, North can simply bid four spades, assuming that his decent trump intermediates will solidify the spade suit.

After West leads the heart jack to trick one, South covers, and wins the next heart in dummy. He should now see that he needs a successful club finesse to make his game. He must therefore plan on the assumption that the club finesse will work. If it loses, he may go down two tricks instead of only one, but the additional undertrick is a fine investment to improve his chances of making game.

If South draws trump, even assuming that they break, and takes a club finesse, he will then have to find a way of getting back to his hand for a second finesse. How can he get back? He cannot do so unless the diamond finesse succeeds; and why risk this unnecessarily?

The solution is to use the trump more efficiently as a means of communication. Declarer leads the trump 10 to the ace at trick three, then abandons trump in order to take a club finesse. He next leads the trump nine to the king and observes West’s discard. He takes a second club finesse, and only then can he draw the last trump by means of the finesse against the jack. This leaves him in position for the third and final club finesse.


Clearly the lead of a black suit looks unattractive. Given that partner has virtually no high cards, are we better off leading from length or from a sequence? It is a close call but I’m going to go with leading from ace-fourth. This seems to work better when partner has four small cards, or the suit breaks evenly round the table.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 5
 A 9 6 3
 Q J 2
♣ A Q 3 2
South West North East
1 ♣ 1 ♠ Pass 2 NT
Pass 3 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 6th, 2016

I disagreed with my partner’s decision to open the following hand with a three-club preempt in second seat non-vulnerable ♠ J-9-4-3, 9-4, 10, ♣ K-Q-J-4-3-2. Where do you stand on the issues of side major-suits, and six-card preempts, and how important is the vulnerability?

Red Menace, Elkhart, Ind.

The seat you are in is important – one needs to be more disciplined in second seat. The side four-card major, weak though it is, might dissuade me from acting either in second seat or if vulnerable. In third chair where I need to keep the opponents guessing, I’d open three clubs, and I would open in first chair non-vulnerable, but not if my spades were even slightly better (say Q-10-43). Preempting specifically in clubs with a six-card suit is often acceptable, less common with other suits.

When holding both majors, I am often torn between a double, an overcall and a Michaels cuebid of a minor-suit opener. For example with ♠ K-J-10-3-2, A-Q-9-4, 10, ♣ Q-4-2 what should you do over a one diamond opener? If you overcall, when your LHO responds one no-trump and the auction is passed back to you, would you balance, and if so with what?

Mighty Quinn, Troy, N.Y.

If you overcall one spade, and then double at your next turn this suggests your approximate values and general shape (though you could be much better). There is something to be said for doubling initially, but you lose the 5-3 spade fit that way — and occasionally a 5-2 spade fit is best. Here your proposed overcall, followed by a double, covers all the bases. A Michaels cuebid should — errors and omissions excepting — always be 5-5 pattern.

Can you give me a definition on how to use all the calls in the bid boxes? I know what bids mean but I cannot find out what the Alert, Stop, X, and XX cards stand for, and who can give an alert if they don’t understand when these calls are used. I haven’t found the answers in books – though maybe this is because they predate the bidding boxes.

June Moon, Willoughby, Ohio

The Alert card signals to the opponents that partner’s call has an artificial or unusual meaning. Use this for every call with what you deem to be an unexpected meaning. Whenever a player is about to skip the bidding by making a jump bid, he makes the call and leaves out the stop card for about 10 seconds. The next player is then expected to wait about 10 seconds before making any call. The X/XX cards simply represent the calls of double and redouble.

I think I understand how four-suit transfers over one no-trump work. But what does Stayman followed by a minor mean (and does it mean the same after a two no-trump opening instead of a one no-trump opener)?

Desperately Seeking Stayman, Madison, Wis.

After a one no-trump opening, Stayman followed by three of a minor shows a good hand (at least the values for game) and five plus cards in the bid minor suit, typically with a side four-card major. After a two no-trump opening you would expect the same sort of handpattern for responder; but the fact you have gone past three no-trump implies you should have at least mild slam interest.

My partner and I were discussing whether our aim should be to bid our own cards as accurately as possible and not worry about the opponents, or whether we should try and be in their faces as much as possible, and accept the bad results that occasionally come with this style. Do you have any opinion where we should be aiming on the spectrum?

Block and Tackle, Park City, Utah

At all but the very highest level you should not aim to be focusing on playing disruptive bridge. Sure, play weak jumps and weak jump raises, and open 11-counts. But accurate bridge wins; I truly believe no one ever lost a match where they and their team mates played well.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 5th, 2016

Confession is good for the soul only in the sense that a tweed coat is good for dandruff — it is a palliative rather than a remedy.

Peter de Vries


W North
None ♠ K 9 6
 K 9 8 7 6
 A 9
♣ 10 5 2
West East
♠ J 8 4
 A Q J 3
 10 8 6 3 2
♣ K
♠ 7 5 3 2
 10 4
 K J
♣ 9 8 7 6 4
South
♠ A Q 10
 5 2
 Q 7 5 4
♣ A Q J 3
South West North East
  Pass Pass Pass
1 ♣ Pass 1 Pass
1 NT Pass 3 NT All pass
       

♠4

Today’s deal is a mea culpa from a reader whose name will be withheld. At least, as he said, he made an interesting mistake.

Declarer was given a helpful start when West led a spade rather than the more challenging diamond. He won with the queen in hand, ducked a heart to East’s 10, won the next spade with the ace in hand, and played another heart. West tranced before playing the jack and declarer won the king and continued the attack on hearts. When the defense cleared spades, declarer did not guess clubs and could no longer make the game.

South realized, too late, that had he taken the club finesse when the heart king held, he would actually have made his game.

First, suppose that West cashes his hearts: now South has three spades, two hearts, three clubs and a diamond. Alternatively, suppose West does not cash either heart winner, but exits immediately with a spade. Declarer wins in dummy and play ace and another diamond, since the diamond king must be with East. The defenders can cash a spade, their fourth defensive trick, but South has three spades, one heart, two diamonds and three clubs.

So perhaps West should cash just one heart after scoring his club king. But now if he plays a spade, declarer gives up a heart while he still has an entry to dummy. If West switches to a diamond instead, now South simply plays low from dummy for the ninth trick, because the defenders have not yet set up East’s long spade.


Hands of this sort present an awkward problem. Should you go high or low, and what strain should you select? My opinion is that if you play the probabilities, partner is likely to hold 12-14 HCP and you have no eight-card fit. So this all argues for going low by bidding one notrump. Partner will move with shape and extras; if he passes, you rate to have no game.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 9 6
 K 9 8 7 6
 A 9
♣ 10 5 2
South West North East
    1 ♣ Pass
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 4th, 2016

Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.

Nils Bohr


W North
N-S ♠ J 9 8 7
 J 4 3
 K J 6 3
♣ A Q
West East
♠ K 6 5 4 3
 10
 A 8 4
♣ J 10 9 2
♠ 10
 K Q 9 6 2
 Q 9 7
♣ 7 6 5 3
South
♠ A Q 2
 A 8 7 5
 10 5 2
♣ K 8 4
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 1 ♠ Dbl.* Pass
3 NT All pass    

*Three-card heart support

♣J

Had North or South been able to reach three no-trump without bidding a major, they would probably have received a favorable lead. But today West was warned off the spade lead, so selected the club jack for his opening salvo. What would you expect the fate of the game to be?

The club lead was won in dummy with the queen, as East followed with the seven, and the spade seven led to the 10 and ace. Declarer then took the losing diamond finesse. The low club return was won in dummy and a diamond played to the 10. When West ducked this, declarer seemed to be very short of tricks. But he cashed the club king and now stripped off West’s heart by leading out the ace, then played a third diamond. West had no choice but to win. Although he could cash his club winner, he then had to lead a spade, giving declarer both a cheap spade trick and also an entry to dummy’s stranded diamond king.

The key to the defense was East’s signal at trick one. When East followed with the club seven he was giving count in a position where it was clear what his attitude was (since he could not beat the queen). So West should have unblocked both the club nine and 10 on the second and third rounds of the suit, leaving himself an entry to his partner’s hand if declarer tried to endplay him.

As a defender, consider giving count (or even occasionally suit preference) if your attitude is already defined by bridge logic.


Your partner is not cuebidding for spades. He has a rock-crusher with clubs. Your hand is very suitable for higher things, so you must not pass now. I’m not sure if it best to cuebid five hearts, raise to six clubs, or whether you can risk five diamonds as an unequivocal cuebid for clubs. I’d choose between five hearts and six clubs based on my estimate of partner’s declarer play skill and his natural optimism.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 6 5 4 3
 10
 A 8 4
♣ J 10 4 2
South West North East
Pass 3 Dbl. Pass
4 ♠ Pass 5 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, March 3rd, 2016

Chiefly the mold of a man’s fortune is in his own hands.

Francis Bacon


E North
None ♠ Q 9 7
 J 10 9 3
 A Q 6
♣ A 6 5
West East
♠ 2
 6 5 4 2
 10 8 4 2
♣ 10 9 8 7
♠ 8 6 5 4
 A K 7
 K J 7
♣ K 4 3
South
♠ A K J 10 3
 Q 8
 9 5 3
♣ Q J 2
South West North East
      1 ♣
1 ♠ 3 ♣ 4 ♠ All pass
       

♣10

The four most regular players at the Dyspeptics Club most frequently play in set partnerships, both North and East putting up with their weaker partners simply to have someone they can shout at without fear of violent physical response. And North swears he will never give up his partner, because, as he says, he holds such poor cards himself that it is a joy to play with a man who regards a strong no-trump as less than his full entitlement of high card points.

In today’s deal South declared four spades on the lead of the club 10. Thinking that it would not matter whether he lost a club now or later, he played low from dummy. East won with the king and, since it was clear that his partner held very little, farsightedly attacked diamonds, playing West for the 10 by boldly leading into dummy’s tenace. Since he was due to regain the lead twice more with his top hearts, he was able to establish the setting trick in diamonds for the defense.

Declarer gains a tempo if he wins the opening lead with the ace. It looks now as though he can draw trump and establishing dummy’s hearts for two diamond discards — but there is a second pitfall. East may let the heart queen win, take the second heart and exit with king and another club. Now declarer is left with two diamond losers.

The correct sequence of play is to win the club ace, play the spade ace and jack, then start on hearts. Now the defense is powerless.


It would be sadistic to leave your partner in one no-trump doubled with a Yarborough. Some people play ‘system on’ after this double. If you do, so that a call of two clubs would be Stayman, you might consider using redouble here as a rescue to a minor. Partner bids two clubs, and you pass or correct to two diamonds. If you play natural rescues, I would advocate running to two clubs initially.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 2
 6 5 4 2
 10 8 4 2
♣ 10 9 8 7
South West North East
Pass 1 1 NT Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, March 2nd, 2016

Common sense is calculation applied to life.

Henri Amiel


W North
Both ♠ K 9 6 4
 8 5
 5 4 2
♣ K 10 3 2
West East
♠ 8 5
 J 9 7 2
 A K Q J 6
♣ Q 4
♠ J 3
 K Q 10 4 3
 9 3
♣ 9 8 7 6
South
♠ A Q 10 7 2
 A 6
 10 8 7
♣ A J 5
South West North East
  1 Pass 1
1 ♠ 2 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

K

In today’s deal declarer did well to get an inferential count on today’s hand, but failed to draw the correct conclusions from his hypothesis.

Against four spades West cashed three rounds of diamonds, East discarding an encouraging heart 10 on the third. West shifted to the heart two, and declarer won the ace and drew trump in two rounds. Then he tried to work out the distribution of the defensive hands.

He could count West for five diamonds and all the honors in that suit. West had supported East’s hearts at his second turn to bid, so was likely to have four of them; for with only three, he might well have made a support double or have passed one spade.

All of this added up to his holding nine cards in the red suits, plus a doubleton spade, which left room for just two clubs. This meant that East must hold four clubs.

And if East held four, South’s conclusion was that the queen was likely to sit with the length, regardless of West’s opening bid strength.

Accordingly he led a club to the jack, and finished two down. What South had failed to appreciate was that he needed four club tricks in order to discard a heart. That would not be possible whatever four clubs East had, if they included the queen, without a serious defensive error.

The correct thought process is that to obtain four club tricks declarer must rely on the club queen lying doubleton in West, and cash the ace then lead low to the king.


While you’d prefer to have six hearts to insist on playing the major facing a one notrump response, circumstances may alter cases. Here your solid heart holding suggests that facing almost any doubleton, hearts will play better than no-trump. Your hand may be virtually worthless at no-trump unless partner has the heart ace. And even facing a singleton honor, you’d like to play hearts, wouldn’t you?

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 3
 K Q 10 4 3
 9 3
♣ 9 8 7 6
South West North East
  Pass 1 Pass
1 Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 1st, 2016

Surely your gladness need not be the less for the thought that you will one day see a brighter dawn than this.

Lewis Carroll


S North
None ♠ J 8 7 4 2
 K J
 Q 7 3
♣ K 10 9
West East
♠ K 6
 7 5 2
 J 10 9 8
♣ A 8 5 3
♠ A
 9 8 6 4
 K 5 4 2
♣ 7 6 4 2
South
♠ Q 10 9 5 3
 A Q 10 3
 A 6
♣ Q J
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

J

The North hand is hard to evaluate in response to a one spade opener. However, a limit raise feels the most sensible description to me; North does not have enough to commit to game with such a balanced hand.

When West leads the diamond jack against four spades declarer puts up dummy’s queen more in hope than expectation, and captures East’s king win with the ace.

Now South is threatened with the loss of two spades, a club, and a diamond. Nothing can be done about the losers in the black suits, but South can prevent the loss of a diamond if he is careful.

Declarer must immediately run the hearts, discarding diamonds from dummy, hoping for the suit to break 4-3. Even though one opponent will surely be able to ruff the fourth round of the suit, this is unlikely to give the defenders a trick that they weren’t going to get anyway.

The defenders have only three trumps between them. If the ruff is made with the trump king or ace, this will immediately eliminate one trump loser. If the ruff is made with the only missing small trump, South may then be able to lead a trump and get both the ace and king to fall together. As the cards lie today, whether West ruffs high or low, or discards, one of the defenders’ sure tricks vanishes.

If declarer had led a trump at the second trick, East would take the spade ace, and now the defenders would get their diamond and club tricks to defeat the contract.


Your hand offers virtually no prospects for slam. Should you bid three no-trump, transfer into spades, or use Stayman? Put my vote in the third category, since a 5-3 spade fit might be the only game that won’t make here. You have enough high cards to be relatively sure that three no-trump will be safe, but a 5-4 spade fit might still be best.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 8 7 4 2
 K J
 Q 7 3
♣ K 10 9
South West North East
    2 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, February 29th, 2016

Every advantage in the past is judged in the face of the final issue.

Demosthenes


E North
N-S ♠ 10 7 5
 K J 10
 K 8 6
♣ K J 6 4
West East
♠ 9 6 4 3 2
 A 6 4
 —
♣ Q 9 8 3 2
♠ 8
 8
 A Q J 10 9 7 4 2
♣ A 10 5
South
♠ A K Q J
 Q 9 7 5 3 2
 5 3
♣ 7
South West North East
      1
1 1 ♠ 2 3
4 All pass    

♣2

This was the very last deal of the NEC tournament last year, and it decided the event, since at that point in the match the Hackett team were leading a Dutch/ UK combination by just five IMPs (thus one swing could change the match result).

In one room Louk Verhees for the trailing team had opened five diamonds as East, and bought the contract there. This was never going to make, but after a spade lead and club shift declarer was home free with 10 tricks.

So the fate of David Gold’s four heart contract would determine first place and all the glory that this entailed. If it made, the Hackett team would be overtaken at the finishing line.

Brian Senior led a club, Gold called for the jack, and Jason Hackett won the ace, then paused for reflection. It looks natural to play his partner’s suit, spades. But had he shifted to a spade, assuming that his diamond tricks could wait, declarer would simply have drawn trump and used the club king to pitch one diamond loser from his hand, and made his game. Hackett worked that out. He cashed the diamond ace then thoughtfully played the diamond two, giving his partner a ruff with a suit preference card to make sure that his partner didn’t play a spade at the fourth trick, and surrender the setting trick in the process.

Not to worry: the trump ace was not going to go away. The contract went down one, and the Hackett team had held on to win.


You could not be overly criticized for a diamond lead, but I’m instinctively drawn to the spade lead. My partner appears to have spades sitting over dummy, and I could easily imagine that a spade lead might produce a trump promotion for my jack. Meanwhile, a diamond lead might allow declarer to get a ruff in dummy.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 8 4
 K 10 7 4 2
 Q 6 4
♣ J 5 3
South West North East
    1 Dbl.
1 1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 28th, 2016

I passed in first chair seat with both sides vulnerable, and heard my LHO open two spades, which was then passed back to me. Would it have been right to pass, double or bid a suit, looking at: ♠ 10-2, A-3, J-10-7-3, ♣ A-Q-6-5-4?

Safe Haven, Newport News, Va.

I would not feel like passing, because of my relatively short spades, but a double might result in partner bidding too many hearts. I go for a call of two notrump, surely for the minors, as a passed hand, as opposed to a three-club call… if partner takes my bid as natural, which he shouldn’t, no great harm will have been done.

Can you tell me how signals are supposed to work and what are the messages the defenders are supposed to send?

Zazzy, Union City, Tenn.

Signaling is the play by a defender to tell your partner what you have or to advise him what to play. A simple signaling system incorporates attitude — high spot cards say “like” low ones say “dislike” — and count (high for even, low for an odd number of cards). And finally for the advanced player, you can signal suit preference. When your cards can’t win a trick, or a continuation is impractical, your cards may tell partner which suit you like. Suits rank in order: spades, hearts, diamonds then clubs. Visit the BridgeBase forums for more details.

If you play the forcing no-trump in response to the opening bid of a major, should you extend this treatment to play it by a passed hand?

Keeping it Open, Worcester, Mass.

The logic of the forcing no-trump is to allow responder to make that call with hands up to and including balanced invitations, or forces to game. Once you pass, you do not have to worry about the no-trump call concealing forcing hands or hands with trump support. So opener should treat the response of one no-trump as nonforcing, and pass unless he has extra shape or high cards.

Several times over the years you have recommended opening two clubs with at least 5/4 or 4/5 in the majors rather than opening at the one-level and risk getting passed out. In a recent article you were dealing with this hand ♠ A-Q-J-6-2, Q-9-6-4, A-K, ♣ A-4. Since game might make opposite king-fourth in hearts, shouldn’t I open two clubs here?

Flaming Lips, Houston, Texas

Consider that a hand with an ace in response will almost always keep the bidding open. And all six-counts respond to an opening bid. Since kingfourth of hearts on its own won’t make game that good, I open one spade without any worries. But let me change the hand to make it a two-club bid. How about ♠ K-Q-J-6-2, A-Q-J-4, A-K-4, ♣ 4? Now I might make game facing as little as the diamond queen and four small hearts.

Should one open one no-trump with a five-card major? If so, is there any suit so strong that you would rather opt to bid it and not one no-trump when you have 15-17 points?

Drawing the Line, Naples, Fla.

With a balanced 17 points (5332 shape) and a five-card major, I generally open the suit and treat my hand as 18-19 points. With a bad major (only one top honor) and 15-16 points I normally open one no-trump. However, if all my points are in two suits, I may opt for bidding the major; and 5-4-2-2 pattern with a long major is NOT balanced.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 27th, 2016

Never revisit the past, that’s dangerous. You know, move on.

Robert Redford


W North
N-S ♠ —
 K J 4 3
 A 9 5 4 3
♣ A K 6 2
West East
♠ Q J 10 9 7
 9 2
 K Q 10 8
♣ 10 4
♠ A 6 5
 A Q 8
 J 6 2
♣ Q J 9 8
South
♠ K 8 4 3 2
 10 7 6 5
 7
♣ 7 5 3
South West North East
  2 ♠* Dbl. Pass
2 NT** Pass 3 ♣ Pass
3 Pass 4 All pass

*Spades and a 4+card minor

**Demanding a call of three clubs

♠Q

This is my final exhibit from last year’s Gold Coast teams tournament in Australia. After North, Simon Hinge had denied real extras at his second turn, he took a flyer to raise his partner’s sign-off in hearts to game.

After the lead of the spade queen, Bill Haughie as declarer discarded a club from dummy. East took her spade ace and correctly returned a top club. Declarer won and played the diamond ace and ruffed a diamond, then cashed the spade king to pitch a club from the board. Now he ruffed a spade, ruffed a diamond, crossed to the club king, and led the fourth diamond from dummy.

When East made the natural play of discarding a club, declarer ruffed in hand, ruffed a club for his ninth trick, and with the heart king-jack still in dummy he could ruff the diamond nine with the heart 10 for his game-going trick.

Let’s rewind to when declarer led the fourth diamond from dummy, establishing North’s fifth diamond. Let’s say East ruffs in with the heart queen; ace and another heart won’t work now. Nor is a club any better, since declarer would simply continue the cross-ruff. But try ruffing the fourth diamond with the heart eight – entirely illogical I know!

Declarer must overruff; he then ruffs a club low, and leads the fifth diamond. When you discard, your partner overruffs East’s heart seven with his nine. Now you take the heart acequeen to set the game.

This defense sets the game when partner has either the heart nine or 10.


When partner has promised only four or more hearts, should we raise with a balanced hand, or rebid one no-trump and ignore the feebleness of our diamond stopper? I opt for the notrump rebid, assuming that if LHO has good long diamonds we may hear from him again, to take us off the hook. And we can compete over two diamonds to two hearts, describing our hand to perfection.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 6 5
 A Q 8
 J 6 2
♣ Q J 9 8
South West North East
1 ♣ 1 1 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2016. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].