February 28th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I used to play that the direct cuebid of the suit opened on my right was stronger than a take-out double. I have been told that this is oldfashioned and that such hands can be handled by doubling, then bidding on over a minimum response. Should I learn the Michaels Cuebid, or is there any better possible use for this call?
Mickey Fingers, Albuquerque, N.M.
I recommend the Michaels Cuebid, since you get to describe a potentially awkward hand in one go. (Specifically, the cuebid of a minor-suit opener shows a twosuiter with both majors with 5-5 pattern, the cuebid of a major shows the other major and an unspecified minor). As against that, the call is often misused on hands with weak suits, and is not without risk. For details of how the call works click here.
At duplicate if a board arrives at the table with one or more cards face up, so that an opponent sees the cards what is the tournament director supposed to do?
Turning Turtle, Tupelo, Miss.
The director should instruct the players to continue play, after establishing away from the table with each player who saw what. Unless one side feels that they have been damaged, the result should stand. If play cannot sensibly continue, both sides will get an average plus on the board. Don’t penalize the offenders unless it is a repeat offense.
I watched two experts try to deal with the following hand after opening one spade and hearing a one no-trump response. With ♠ K-Q-10-8-6-2, ♥ A-10-9, ♦ A-K-8-2, ♣ — one expert forced to game with a call of three diamonds, while one bid two diamonds. Each went down in five diamonds, facing a nine-count with a doubleton spade and four diamonds. Since four spades would have made, don’t you think a rebid of three spades makes sense here?
Milli Vanilli, Summit, N.J.
|
I admit it could work and I might do so today, but equally, facing short spades it might prove disastrous. With a good 6-4 one tends not to rebid the major unless it is the only choice. I have a sneaking admiration for a two diamond call – perhaps planning to rebid three spades if raised, intending to remove a three no-trump rebid to four hearts. There is no good answer, though, I admit.
I recently read a couple of columns which I felt were way above the average bridge player’s ability. I still enjoy reading bridge columns but I wonder if the target should be to educate or to improve the average bridge player.
Over the top, Sunny Isles, Fla.
Thank you for your comment. I tend to work on deals in my files or from the tournaments last year that have taken my fancy as a player or spectator. So I am somewhat limited by what I have to work with. My target is normally to start off easily on Monday, then work up to a tougher problem on Saturday. But sometimes I get carried away, I admit!
In a recent column you mentioned that at no-trump on the first trick you can agree to lead the king to suggest a strong holding, allowing partner to unblock the jack or queen. I thought the ACE requested the unblock, whereas the king would be from the top of a weaker sequence.
Cough it Up, Columbia, S.C.
There are two distinct schools of thought here. One can either agree to play ace and queen for attitude, king for count or unblock; or to play king for attitude and ace and queen for unblock. Both agreements are equally sound — all that matters is that you do one or the other (having no unblock card is unsound) and that you know what your partner does!
|
February 27th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The first step towards amendment is the recognition of error.
Seneca
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K Q
♥ A 6 2
♦ A K 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5 4
♥ Q J 10 8 5
♦ Q J
♣ 4 3 2 6 5 |
♠ —
♥ 9
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ A K J 9 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 8 7 6 3 2
♥ K 7 4 3
♦ 5 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
4 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
It would be easy to pass, looking at your absence of aces and kings, but the key to deciding whether to compete to the three-level is your fifth trump. When you bid three hearts you deny having a game try, since with that hand you would bid three clubs or three diamonds (or four hearts!). Such competitive deals are easier to judge if you play support doubles, so that partner’s raise promises four trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ Q J 10 8 5
♦ Q J
♣ 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 26th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Danger, the spur of all great minds.
George Chapman
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 3
♥ 6 4
♦ A K J 6 2
♣ A K J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4
♥ K 7 2
♦ 10 8 5 4
♣ 10 9 5 3 |
♠ A 7 5
♥ A Q J 5 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 6 2
♥ 10 9 8
♦ Q 9 7
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
It is tempting to raise clubs, but that takes you past three no-trump, which could easily be the best game. I would probe with three spades, using the fourth suit to encourage partner to bid three no-trump with a half stopper in spades or a three-card holding.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ A Q J 5 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 25th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Love truth, but pardon error.
Voltaire
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 3
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ K Q 7 5
♣ A 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ 5 4 2
♦ 9 8 6 4
♣ 5 3 2 |
♠ K J 10 9 7
♥ 6
♦ J 10 3 2
♣ K Q 8 |
| South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ A Q J 10 8
♦ A
♣ J 9 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
Your partner’s double is card-showing not penalty. You would normally only pass with two or more trump tricks, otherwise you would describe your hand further. Here you have an unbid four-card major, so you have a straightforward call of two hearts. Partner can bid on if he wants, but he knows you have both red suits and a minimum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ K Q 7 5
♣ A 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 24th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 10th, 2016
The man who knows when not to act is wise. To my mind, bravery is forethought.
Euripides
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A K 9 7 4
♦ Q 9 5
♣ J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ 6
♦ K J 10 4
♣ K Q 9 8 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ J 10 8 3
♦ 8 3 2
♣ 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 4 3
♥ Q 5 2
♦ A 7 6
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Your partner’s redouble is SOS, suggesting a two- or three-suited hand with short hearts, after your LHO passed his partner’s take-out double for penalties. For the time being, you have absolutely no problem in bidding your three-card spade suit, as asked.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 2
♥ A K 9 7 4
♦ Q 9 5
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It is no matter what you teach (children) first, any more than what leg you shall put into your breeches first.
Samuel Johnson
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 9 4 2
♥ A J
♦ K J 8 7 6
♣ 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7
♥ K Q 9 6 2
♦ 9 2
♣ K 10 9 8 |
♠ —
♥ 10 8 7 3
♦ Q 10 5 3
♣ A Q J 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 6 5 3
♥ 5 4
♦ A 4
♣ 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣* |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spade support, short clubs
♥K
There is no way in standard bidding to show this precise two-suiter, since a cuebid shows the majors, a jump to two no-trump shows the red suits. But you must bid, and despite the fact that your diamonds are better than the spades, I would overcall one spade now. The space-consuming nature of the bid, and the fact that spades are the ranking suit, tips the balance for me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 4 2
♥ A J
♦ K J 8 7 6
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Thou art weighed in the balances and found wanting.
Book of Daniel
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 6 5 3
♥ 4 3 2
♦ A 8 6 4 2
♣ Q |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 8
♥ A
♦ Q 10 7
♣ J 10 9 5 4 |
♠ J 9 7 4 2
♥ 8 7 6
♦ 9 5 3
♣ K 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ K Q J 10 9 5
♦ K J
♣ A 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣J
The choice is whether to lead trump (I think not, because the spade jack might play an important role on defense) or to open up a red suit. My best guess would be to lead hearts rather than diamonds. The likelihood of partner having neither missing top heart seems smaller than that a lead from the broken diamond suit will cost a trick or tempo.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J
♥ K J 8 7 6
♦ J 9 7 3
♣ Q 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
February 21st, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
My partner and I debated long and hard as to the best plan to develop my powerhouse, which consisted of ♠ A-K-7-2, ♥ 8, ♦ A-K-Q-J, ♣ A-K-Q-4. At the table I opened two clubs and bid two spades over his negative response. After a tangled auction we ended in a 4-2 spade fit, with the notrump game having nine top tricks. Should I open a minor suit — with 26 HCPs that seems like a very bad idea? Or should I have rebid three no-trump over two diamonds, and taken a chance on the hearts?
Powerhouse Pete, Cartersville, Ga.
I think you have to open two clubs, and rebid two spades, hoping to get out alive one way or another. With even a queen less I might risk one diamond, but since slam might make facing the spade queen and five small in a minor, a non-forcing call is too much (or too little) for me. Make the singleton an honor and treating your hand as balanced starts to make more sense.
How much do you need to keep the auction open after your partner preempts in first seat, and should a new suit be forcing? My hand was ♠ K-10-2, ♥ 7-3, ♦ A-Q-10-6-4-3, ♣ A-9 in response to a preempt of two hearts, and I thought we might make a game in a red suit or at no-trump.
Robert the Bruce, Torrance, Calif.
I think a three diamond call here would be misguided. You have already found a decent fit, so do not need to look for another one. A three diamond call would be forcing; so give yourself better diamonds, or perhaps the club king or queen in addition, and a bid might make sense, as you might make game. Here, you should simply pass two hearts.
Recently after an uncontested auction beginning one diamond – one spade, you described the jump to four hearts as a splinter bid. Since a call of two hearts would be a forcing reverse (promising another bid) could three hearts be used as the splinter bid? This seems to leaves more room for slam exploration; what do you say?
Born in the USA, Twin Falls, Idaho
|
A jump to three hearts might indeed be played as a splinter, though many use it as a mini-splinter, that is to say, short hearts with a raise to three spades. Some play it as either a raise to three or five spades, so that the splinter to four hearts would suggest 16-18. Yet another style is that the jump to four hearts might be a void. I prefer all of these approaches to reserving three hearts for a 5-6 shape.
You discussed the auction where you responded one heart to one diamond and then heard a two spade preempt to your left, passed back to you. If a double of two spades is for takeout, does it suggest points only, or does it indicate shape and might partner expect you to hold all the unbid suits? And what would a call of three diamonds mean instead? Would that show less than invitational values?
Douglas Fir, Detroit, Mich.
The double shows values — suggesting 9+HCP; but it is unlimited. You rate to have at least diamond tolerance (but may be more fitted with better than a limit raise). Incidentally, opener’s double would simply be extra values, and there is never any form of support double at this level by responder. A balancing call of three diamonds by you would be real support, non-forcing, so 7-11 HCP, probably.
Holding: ♠ 10-2, ♥ A-K-Q-6-4-3-2, ♦ Q-10, ♣ J-4 how many hearts would you bid over an opening bid of one diamond on your right? Your side only is vulnerable.
Hi-Lo Country, Durham, N.C.
As I grow older I get more disciplined, so this constitutes a three heart preempt for me at unfavorable vulnerability (or a two heart intermediate jump if you play this style). I’m not keen on jumping to four hearts when vulnerable with such flat sidesuit shape and with those secondary honors, which may be worth a trick. It seems like an invitation to go for 500, or more. And I have no idea what to do if I push them to bid five diamonds. So why should my partner know?
|
February 20th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
It doesn’t make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement.
Jackson Pollock
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 9 8 6 5
♥ K J 10
♦ K 2
♣ 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 4 2
♥ —
♦ Q 6 5 3
♣ J 10 9 7 |
♠ —
♥ 9 8 6 5 4
♦ J 9 8 7
♣ Q 8 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 3
♥ A Q 7 3 2
♦ A 10 4
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦* |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*One key-card with hearts as trump
♣J
Some play the call of two no-trump in this sequence as a relay, asking for range and the number of trumps in support. Failing that (and one can survive quite nicely without it) this hand is worth one game try, and the most appropriate call seems to me to bid three hearts, showing length and looking for help there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 6 5
♥ K J 10
♦ K 2
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 19th, 2016 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
We are not sure of sorrow, And joy was never sure.
Algernon Swinburne
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 7 5
♥ 9 8 6 5 2
♦ A Q
♣ 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 2
♥ 4
♦ 9 5 4 2
♣ K Q 10 6 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 9 4
♥ J 10 3
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ A 8 |
| South |
♠ K 8 3
♥ A K Q 7
♦ K J 6
♣ J 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
Not all five-card suits are created equal; as George Orwell might say, some are more – or less — equal than others. I will make an executive decision that I don’t want to look for a fivethree heart fit (for example by a Smolen call of three spades to show this major-suit pattern) but will simply bid three no-trump directly, and forget about the hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7 5
♥ 9 8 6 5 2
♦ A Q
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal South could not stand to sell out over the intervention to his partner’s two club opener. When he heard his partner raise four spades to five, this asked for a club control, and with a club void South felt he had to accept the invitation.
When West led the heart queen, declarer counted 11 top tricks. If trumps were 2-1, the 12th trick could come most easily by ruffing a heart in dummy. However, if trumps were 3-0, the route to the slam-going trick would be through establishing dummy’s diamonds.
Once West turned up with three trumps, the risk of an overruff on the third round of diamonds, should West have only a doubleton, was a real one. But declarer could see nothing better. When he played the diamond ace-king and ruffed a diamond, West was able to overruff, leaving declarer with a heart loser. At the table South was justifiably able to bemoan his bad luck.
However, there was an elegant solution South had overlooked. Win the first heart in hand with the king and a play a trump to the queen. When East shows out, declarer leads the club queen from table and discards a diamond on East’s king.
After a diamond return, dummy can win and South can ruff a diamond low in hand, draw trump with the ace and king and a further diamond is ruffed in hand. Finally, the heart ace is the entry to the board to run the remaining diamonds. Declarer ends up taking seven trump tricks, two hearts and three diamonds.