November 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, November 2nd, 2014
|
Is there a right way or a wrong way to tackle a suit such as A-J-4-2 in dummy facing K-10-3 in hand for four tricks? What if you know your RHO has at most two cards in the suit?
Find the Lady, Staten Island, N.Y.
With no special information, and assuming no communication problems, lead out the ace or king, then lead a low card towards the other honor, and finesse. You might think that if you need four tricks in the suit and your RHO is short that you should lead low to the jack, or run the 10 from hand, playing the hand with length for the queen; not so. Your only legitimate chance of four tricks is to find your RHO with the bare queen or doubleton queen, so lead low to the 10 in your hand.
My RHO was second to speak with: ♠ J-3, ♥ A-5-4-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-10-4. He passed, and heard his partner overcall one heart over one club. He simply raised to two hearts, and it made on the button. I thought the hand was worth more than that, but he said he discounted the club king. What do you think?
Undervalued, Sunbury, Pa.
Your opponent was both pessimistic and more than a little fortunate. These days after a third in hand opening bid the location of the club king is entirely undefined, and with five-card support many would cuebid two clubs to show a strong raise — and would then certainly consider going to the three-level voluntarily.
After opener rebids one no-trump, what is your opinion about responder having a conventional continuation, such as using the New Minor as a forcing bid? In other words after an unopposed sequence one diamond – one spade – one no-trump, do you advocate using two clubs as a forcing bid, unrelated to clubs?
Inspector Gadget, Augusta, Maine
This is a relatively advanced idea, however, once you adopt it, this is one of the conventions that you will find it hard to do without. It may not be absolutely essential, but you will find it simplifies your constructive bidding to put all forcing hands through the New Minor, and to invite with a jump.
|
I picked up the following minimum opening bid: ♠ Q-2, ♥ J-8-6, ♦ K-Q-9-7-4-3, ♣ A-3. I opened one diamond and rebid two diamonds over my partner's one spade response. He now bid two hearts; I was not sure if that was forcing and if so what I should bid. Any thoughts?
In a Fog, Columbia, S.C.
New suits by responder at his second turn are almost always forcing (by contrast, a limit bid in his suit, your suit, or in no-trump can be passed). Your partner's call shows at least invitational values, looking for support for his suits or to reach no-trump facing a stopper in the fourth suit. Since you denied primary spade support at your second turn, your honor-doubleton is sufficient to give partner preference now. No-trumps can follow at your next turn — if there is one.
As dealer at favorable vulnerability I passed, and my partner opened one club in third seat, which was doubled on my right. I held ♠ 10-5-3-2, ♥ Q-6-4-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-5-3. I bid one heart, then passed my partner's one spade call, to his evident displeasure, though he made only nine tricks when holding an 18-count and four-four in the black-suits, with three-card heart support. Should either of us have done more, notwithstanding our good result?
Grounds for Appeal, Durham, N.C.
There speaks a true perfectionist. With 18 HCP, you have the choice of one spade, two spades, or two no-trump, depending on the quality of the spades, the controls, and the guard in the fourth suit. I would not jump rebid two spades without three hearts and good controls here. Regardless, with your actual hand, a pass stands out over one spade.
|
November 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Protection is not a principle but an expedient.
Benjamin Disraeli
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 8 6
♥ 10 8 2
♦ J 6 4 2
♣ 9 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 7
♥ J 9 5
♦ A 5
♣ J 7 6 3 |
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 4 3
♦ K Q 10 9 8 3
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
♠ 4 3 2
♥ A K Q 7 6
♦ 7
♣ A K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♦ |
| 3♣ |
3♦ |
4♥ |
All pass |
♦A
It bears repeating that after the double of a major suit, a jump to two no-trump should be a high-card limit raise, so that the double raise shows a preemptive raise. This convention, named after Bobby Jordan or Alan Truscott, depending on whom you ask, is efficient because no natural meaning is needed for the two no-trump call after a double. Redouble usually shows a maximum pass without spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 7
♥ J 9 5
♦ A 5
♣ J 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 31st, 2014
Success requires enough optimism to provide hope and enough pessimism to prevent complacency.
David G. Myers
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 8 5
♥ 6 4 3
♦ J 9
♣ A K Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7 6 3
♥ 9 8 2
♦ 3
♣ 10 9 8 2 |
♠ —
♥ A Q J 10 5
♦ K Q 8 5 4 2
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 4 2
♥ K 7
♦ A 10 7 6
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
3♦ |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦3
Whether or not one plays a new suit as forcing in response to a one-level overcall, one should play new suits by an unpassed hand as forcing in response to a two-level overcall, or in response to partner's overcall of a pre-emptive opening bid. Otherwise, it is impossible to bid constructively in positions like this, where a simple response of three spades keeps all the options open.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 4 2
♥ K 7
♦ A 10 7 6
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♣ |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It is not enough that a thing be possible for it to be believed.
Voltaire
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J 10 5
♥ A 6 2
♦ A K
♣ K Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ K Q 9 7 5
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ 6 4 3 |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ 8 3
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ 9 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K 9 6 4
♥ J 10 4
♦ J 6 4
♣ A J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♥* |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
*Hearts and a minor
♣3
Every partnership ought to agree whether in such auctions fourth hand's pass over the redouble should be a suggestion of playing there, or should indicate nothing to say. My experience is that it is not infrequent to be able to pass here for penalty. So with a hand where you have no points but a long suit you must bid your suit at once. Thus, bid four clubs with as much enthusiasm as you can muster.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 3 2
♥ 8 3
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ 9 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
3♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The moon lies fair Upon the straits; on the French coast, the light Gleams, and is gone.
Matthew Arnold
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 6 3
♥ A K 2
♦ J 5
♣ K J 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7 5
♥ Q J 10 6
♦ A 4 3
♣ 10 |
♠ A K J 2
♥ 9 8 7 4
♦ 10
♣ 9 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ 5 3
♦ K Q 9 8 7 6 2
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2♦* |
Pass |
3♠ |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Both majors, weak
♣10
Your three-club call ought to set up a game-forcing auction (though in some cases, one might play four of a minor as forcing) so you should not pass now. Rather than bid three spades, which might get partner to bid three no-trump with a half-stopper in spades such as a doubleton queen, bid three hearts now. Partner will not raise without four trumps, and if he bids three no-trump, you can pass happily.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6 3
♥ A K 2
♦ J 5
♣ K J 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
2♠ |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
You have only one life and one chance to do all the things you want to do.
Melchor Lam
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 5
♥ Q 10 7 2
♦ Q J
♣ Q J 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 4 3
♥ J 9 5 3
♦ 10 8 3
♣ A |
♠ J 9 7 6
♥ K 6
♦ 9 6 4 2
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A 8 4
♦ A K 7 5
♣ K 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
Your partner's call of four clubs is a slam-try, and with your remarkably good trumps you have enough to cooperate with a call of four spades, a cue-bid implicitly agreeing clubs, the last-bid suit. If you had diamond preference, you would probably bid four diamonds over four clubs. Just for the record, a bid of four no-trump by you here would be to play.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5
♥ Q 10 7 2
♦ Q J
♣ Q J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The people have little intelligence, the great no heart. If I had to choose, I should have no hesitation: I would be of the people.
Jean de la Bruyere
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A J 5 2
♥ Q J 10 9
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8
♥ K 8 3
♦ J 8 6 3
♣ K 7 5 3 |
♠ K 10 7 4 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 10 2
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ Q 6
♥ 7 4 2
♦ A K 9 5
♣ A Q 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♣3
Before you lead, you should establish if dummy has promised four spades, or if this was the only way he could produce an invitational raise in no-trump (and yes, your opponents should tell you without being asked). Assuming dummy has not promised spades, I would lead one, but if dummy has shown spades, I would lead a club.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4 2
♥ 10 7 4
♦ K 4
♣ J 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
November 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Say you are dealt the following uninspiring collection: ♠ Q-3-2, ♥ 6-5, ♦ Q-9-6-5-2, ♣ J-7-4 and are in fourth chair. Would you take action after hearing one club on your left, doubled by partner, and one heart on your right? I passed and the opponents bought the hand in two hearts, while we could have made a diamond partscore.
Stumbling Sam, Orlando, Fla.
Your initial pass is reasonable, but my intention would be to back in with two diamonds at my next turn. In fact, if the opponents bid and raise hearts, announcing a fit, I might even contemplate risking a balance of three diamonds, assuming that they had eight trumps between them.
What is your opinion on opening a strong no-trump with ♠ 8-2, ♥ K-9-6-2, ♦ A-Q-8-5, ♣ A-K-8? While the high-cards are perfect, I believe the small doubleton is a problem because a major-suit lead is the most common lead against a no-trump contract. Am I being too conservative?
Man Overboard, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Any time you have a balanced 15-17 (especially, by the way, 16, where any other treatment of the hand except as a balanced 15-17 looks unacceptable) you must open 1 NT. Even with a five-card major — unless all your values are in two suits — the no-trump call is generally right.
I had a problem on the third round of the auction when I picked up ♠ 10-7-4, ♥ Q-10-8-5, ♦ A-Q-9-5, ♣ A-J and opened one diamond in second seat. My LHO overcalled one spade, my partner made a negative double, and I rebid two hearts, passed around to my RHO, who bid two spades. Should I bid three hearts now or pass?
Fighting Mad, Bay City, Mich.
|
When you bid two hearts, you showed four hearts and a minimum opening — exactly what you have. Since your RHO's two-spade call might be based on a doubleton spade, your three little spades are not a bonus. I'd pass smoothly and hope partner can find a second call.
When you open one no-trump and partner responds with Stayman, how do you deal with intervention? Can you ever bid at the three-level?
Going for Broke, Peru, Ind.
If the opponents double, then make your normal call, except that redouble shows four or more very good clubs, while two diamonds shows real diamonds, and pass is the default call with nothing to say. Over higher intervention, bid at the two-level if you can, doubling for penalties. Only bid at the three-level with a five-card suit, plus a maximum.
What do you think of giving suit-preference when partner leads an ace and dummy has a singleton — or some other holding where continuation seems unlikely to be right? If not, what should you play?
Smoke Signals, Greenville, S.C.
It is remarkable how often continuation of the suit led is the right defense in such situations. However, to my mind, suit-preference is a simple enough way to go if dummy has two :possible" shifts for partner to make. A middle card therefore asks for continuation of the led suit. If dummy has only one sensible alternative continuation at trick two, then encouraging the opening lead should ask partner not to make that obvious shift.
|
November 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
We are all controlled by the world in which we live, and part of that world has been and will be constructed by men.
Burrhus Skinner
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 5 2
♥ K 8
♦ A 8 7 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 9 5 3 2
♦ K Q J 6
♣ J 10 8 7 5 |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ 10 7 6 4
♦ 10 5 4 3
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 7 6 3
♥ A Q J
♦ 9
♣ K 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♦* |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥** |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♣ |
Pass |
7♠ |
All pass |
*Shortage
**Two keycards
♦K
Whether or not the call of two diamonds is game-forcing or forcing for one round, I am deeply uncomfortable with bidding three clubs on a hand with minimum shape and high cards, plus most of the values in an unbid suit. I could live with rebidding two spades as a temporizing move, or bidding two no-trump, which gets the values across, though it suggests two diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 6 3
♥ A Q J
♦ 9
♣ K 9 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Standing on the defensive indicates insufficient strength; attacking, a superabundance of strength.
Sun Tzu
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 6
♥ J 8 3
♦ Q 9 7 5
♣ A 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 5 2
♥ A 9 6
♦ J 8 6
♣ 8 4 |
♠ K 3
♥ 10 7 5 4 2
♦ 4 2
♣ K 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 9 8 7 4
♥ K Q
♦ A K 10 3
♣ Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠Q
There are hands with this pattern where you might offer a choice of contracts with a call of two hearts now. If, for example, you had a chunky five-card heart suit headed by the Q-J-10, your hand might play much better in hearts than in spades. The reverse holds true here; your values look just fine for play in spades, so give preference to two spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3
♥ 10 7 5 4 2
♦ 4 2
♣ K 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Would you balance here as East over one heart? Doing so is fraught with danger. Though partner is marked with some values, he has not overcalled, so the opponents rate to be able to outbid you, and you just might push them into a makeable game.
However, one intrepid East bid two diamonds; South showed a good hand with clubs and hearts (yes, doubling for take-out was a sensible option) and now North re-assessed his hand and jumped to game.
West led and continued diamonds, and South ruffed and cashed the heart ace and king. Then he set about clubs, ruffing the fourth in dummy, while East discarded two diamonds. Any attempt to ruff a diamond back to hand to draw the last trump was likely to be overruffed by West, but South found a neat solution. He led a diamond from dummy, and discarded a spade. East led his last diamond, and again declarer threw a spade. Fresh out of other suits, East was forced to return a spade, which South won with dummy’s ace, then ruffed a spade back to hand and drew the last trump.
East, it proved, was doubly wrong. First in re-opening and pushing North-South to a game they would not otherwise have reached; and second by failing to defeat it. Suppose that he discards one diamond and one spade on the clubs. Then, if the play goes as before, he has a fifth diamond to play, and West’s heart jack is promoted for the setting trick.