|
My partner and I had an uncontested auction: 1 ♦ – 1 ♥ – 1 ♠ – 4 ♠. Now, holding ♠ A-Q-6-2, ♥ —, ♦ A-K-J-7-5-3, ♣ K-6-3, I expected to find a shapely hand with less than an opening bid, (maybe 4-6 in the majors) and passed. This was not a success as my partner actually had a 4-5-0-4 hand with both the king-jack of spades and the ace-jack of clubs. Did either of us do anything stupid?
In the Lurch, Elmira, N.Y.
On this auction the strong hand can reasonably assume facing a jump to game that there won't be two fast losers. Whether slam is good or not may depend on partner's fillers. If partner has shape but nonsolid hearts, slam may be horrible. Still — any hand with the spade king and two diamonds will offer play for slam, so I must admit I would bid it.
In second seat, after a pass on my right, I had ♠ 7, ♥ K-J-10-6-5, ♦ A-Q-5-3, ♣ K-10-9, and opened one heart. My LHO joined in with one spade, my partner raised to two hearts, and my RHO competed to two spades. It feels right to me to compete further — but is a call of three diamonds or three hearts correct here?
Moving On, Bristol, Va.
Three diamonds should deliver real extras in shape or high-cards since it is a game-try, and thus your partner is allowed to bid four hearts at his next turn. Meanwhile, since you really have only a competitive three-heart call, make that bid. Partner will know not to bid on here in further competition. Make your club nine the queen and you might easily make game opposite a couple of working high cards.
My partner and I have been discussing the idea of playing Mitchell Stayman after our minor-suit openings are overcalled with one no-trump. Do you play anything artificial here, and would you recommend this, or something like it?
Grampus, Richmond, Va.
|
For clarification for my readers: when partner's minor-suit opening bid is overcalled by a bid of one no-trump, a call of two clubs (or possibly two of the other minor) can be used as Stayman rather than a club raise. You lose the ability to play two clubs, but in turn get both majors into the picture. I would rate it as a mildly useful gadget, but it is not an essential tool. It is certainly not a good idea for those inclined to forget their system!
My partner opened one no-trump, and I transferred into hearts with a call of two diamonds, holding ♠ J-3, ♥ Q-10-7-6-5, ♦ 9-5, ♣ A-J-4-3. This was doubled, and my partner passed. What should the pass mean — and what should I do now?
Lucky Luke, Kenosha, Wis.
Without the double, you might have thought about inviting to game with two no-trump. But partner's pass suggests only two hearts, and nothing about diamonds, except that a redouble would have been to play. That being so, you probably want to stay low and bid two hearts. I would use a redouble as a re-transfer here — but I would not recommend that in an untried partnership.
You have recently made the point on several occasions that, in competition, jump raises of partner's opening or overcall should be weaker rather than stronger, in terms of high cards. Can you clarify for me how many points you recommend playing the cue-bid to show?
Meter Maid, Sacramento, Calif.
A cue-bid guarantees the values for at least interest in game, and shows limit-raise values. Some nine-counts clearly qualify; equally, some 10-counts clearly don't. This applies to the cue-bid in response to an opening or an overcall. When in doubt, upvalue side aces and kings and devalue soft honors in the side-suits. Mentally add on for side-suit shortage; deduct for honors in the opponents' suits.
|
In the 2008 World Championship finals, the first board of the last day saw England, the losing team, mount a big charge against Italy, to claw back to a tie in the match.
The Italian South heard his partner double four clubs for takeout, and removed the double to four diamonds, doubled by West. North then bid four hearts, again doubled by West, down 500. In the other room, our featured room, the Italian East opened only three clubs. This allowed the English to play three no-trump on the auction shown.
West led the spade queen, ducked, and continued with a small spade. The partnership’s conventional style of leading was consistent with pretty much any spade holding that included the king and queen, so declarer, Nick Sandqvist, went wrong here by putting in the 10. That lost to the jack, and East switched to his diamond. Declarer ducked, and West won, the defender’s third trick, and cleared the spades. Sandqvist appeared to be in trouble, but when he cashed the heart ace-king and East played the 10 and nine, he realized dummy’s Q-7 of hearts constituted a tenace over West’s J-6.
He cashed the club king and ace, forcing West to part with two diamonds, bringing him down to one spade, two hearts, and two diamonds. When he exited with the spade three, pitching his club loser, West had to win and choose between giving dummy three extra heart winners or declarer three extra diamond tricks.