September 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
As often as a study is cultivated by narrow minds, they will draw from it narrow conclusions.
John Stuart Mill
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 6
♥ 9 7 4
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K J 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 3
♥ J 6
♦ A J 9 5
♣ 10 8 7 |
♠ 2
♥ K Q 10 8 5 2
♦ K 10 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 5 4
♥ A 3
♦ Q 3
♣ A Q 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
It may be easier to rule out what you shouldn't lead here. I can't imagine leading a red suit. (A trump is highly dangerous, while a diamond could backfire equally easily.) With a choice of black suits, I'd settle for a club simply because partner didn't overcall — which he might have done, had a spade lead been best.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 4
♥ J 8 6
♦ K 5 4
♣ 10 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
Can you comment on the use of screens in major events? Doesn't it make it hard to work out what cards are played — and doesn't it detract from the idea that bridge is a social game?
Hidden Depths, Mason City, Iowa
Screens are put in place to prevent accidental (or deliberate) conveying of information from one partner to another. As we saw in a recent world championship, determined cheaters may still break the rules. But it makes the game more relaxed when you cannot see your partner, or vice versa. I like screens for the top-level competitions, if not elsewhere.
What about the role of computers in bridge? Have they become more relevant recently, and would you recommend I get one to help me practice?
Square Eyes, Hartford, Conn.
These days one aspect of bridge on computers has become indispensable. BBO is the site that lets you play, practice and watch Vugraph — for free. Thanks to Fred Gitelman, everyone can watch, learn and play the game. Handheld computer games work pretty well, but I'm not sure they measure up to competing against real people. And I've been enjoying vubridge recently, where some challenging deals are posted.
Could you clarify for me what is best practice as to when to overcall and when to bid a moderate five-card suit on a limited hand? I held: ♠ K-10-4-3-2, ♥ 9-6-5, ♦ A-Q-5-3, ♣ 3, and was not sure what to do over an opening call of one club on my right. Would it matter if the opening bid was one heart instead of one club?
White Collar, Doylestown, Pa.
Typically, with minimum values and a five-card major, I would take the opportunity to overcall at the one-level, not to double, whatever the opening bid. Just for the record: With five diamonds and 4-3 in the other unbid suits, I would normally double. However, suit quality does play a part in the calculation, and since overcalls are typically lead-directing, I try not to overcall in an honorless suit.
|
In Bid With the Aces, you recently stated that as responder after the unopposed sequence: one spade – one no-trump – three diamonds, you should cue-bid four hearts. That bid of course bypasses a four club cue-bid, which I thought would therefore imply that responder lacked both the ace and king of clubs. If responder cue-bids four clubs, then over four diamonds, he could next cue-bid four hearts. What am I missing?
Fruit Loops, Galveston, Texas
I'm not sure whether four clubs might not be natural in this sequence, since the one-no-trump response could conceal a club suit. Yes, partner has shown long diamonds, but mightn't you have equally long, or longer, clubs? By contrast, the four-heart call is unequivocally agreeing diamonds, and I don't think it denies a club control. I do see your point, though.
What is the experts' current treatment of the double of a splinter-bid? Should it be lead-directing, looking for a sacrifice — or something else altogether? And does the vulnerability matter in this situation?
Strawberry Fields, Kenosha, Wis.
The normal position is to play the double as lead-directing, prepared to sacrifice if the vulnerability looks favorable. However, some people play a convention invented by George Rosenkranz, whereby the double calls for a lead of a suit below the one you double. Of course, without a specific agreement, that treatment would be highly unusual.
|
September 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Neither situations nor people can be altered by the interference of an outsider. If they are to be altered, that alteration must come from within.
Phyllis Bottome
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 8 6 4
♥ 9 4
♦ J 8 6 3
♣ 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 3
♥ —
♦ Q 9 7 5 4
♣ Q J 9 6 4 2 |
♠ J 5 2
♥ Q J 10 7 3 2
♦ 10 2
♣ A 10 |
| South |
♠ K 9 7
♥ A K 8 6 5
♦ A K
♣ K 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♥* |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♣Q
Your three-heart response to the two-no-trump opening is a Jacoby transfer, showing five or more spades. You have enough points to force to game (you may not make it, but that is not the point) and best now is to offer a choice of games with a call of three no-trump. Let partner pick which game to play; he knows your basic hand-type.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 8 6 4
♥ 9 4
♦ J 8 6 3
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
When our perils are past, shall our gratitude sleep? No — here’s to the pilot that weathered the storm.
George Canning
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 9 7 5
♥ A Q 2
♦ 5 2
♣ A K 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 3
♥ —
♦ Q J 10 6 4 3
♣ 9 7 5 |
♠ —
♥ J 10 9 6 4 3
♦ K 9
♣ Q J 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 4 2
♥ K 8 7 5
♦ A 8 7
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
If you play as I do, that one diamond denies a major in a hand with less than game-invitational values, then you do not have to worry about introducing a moderate four-card major here, so should bid one no-trump. This action is driven by your good heart stoppers and weak spades. Switch the major honors around so that you have ace-queen fourth of spades, and I would bid one spade.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 5
♥ A Q 2
♦ 5 2
♣ A K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Between good sense and good taste there is the same difference as between cause and effect.
Jean de la Bruyere
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 5 2
♥ Q 3
♦ A J 9 8 6 4
♣ Q 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 3
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ Q 10 7 3
♣ 10 3 2 |
♠ K J 9 4
♥ A 10 2
♦ K 5
♣ J 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 7 6
♥ K 7 6 4
♦ 2
♣ A K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
This hand is worth one try for game despite partner's announced lack of interest so far. By bidding three clubs, you describe your shape and values to let partner have the last word on level and strain.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 7 6
♥ K 7 6 4
♦ 2
♣ A K 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Youth is wasted on the young.
George Bernard Shaw
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q 10
♥ A K Q 5
♦ 9 3
♣ Q J 10 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 6 5 2
♥ 6 3 2
♦ K 8 7
♣ 6 5 |
♠ K 4 3
♥ J 10 9 8
♦ 6 5 4
♣ A K 7 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8
♥ 7 4
♦ A Q J 10 2
♣ 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠5
When you have game-going values, introduce your longest suit first rather than bidding the major. It is only with hands of less than invitational strength (so-called one-bid hands) that you tend to bid the major before the minor. Here, bid two clubs, then get hearts into the picture at the next turn, to describe your hand precisely.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ A K Q 5
♦ 9 3
♣ Q J 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 16th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I don't care how much a man talks, if he only says it in a few words.
Josh Billings
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 7 5 3
♥ J 9 4
♦ 4 2
♣ K 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 4
♥ 8 6
♦ A 10 8 6
♣ A Q 10 |
♠ K 8
♥ Q 3
♦ 9 5 3
♣ J 9 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 6 2
♥ A K 10 7 5 2
♦ K Q J 7
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
3♣ |
| 4♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥8
With a hand that is not worth accepting the invitation to game, it might look normal to pass the two-no-trump call. But here my best guess would be to bid three clubs, suggesting long clubs and a weak hand. Facing a balanced hand, the six-card club suit might be worth considerably more as a trump suit than in no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8
♥ Q 3
♦ 9 5 3
♣ J 9 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 15th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In this country (England) it is thought well to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.
Voltaire
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K Q
♥ Q 4
♦ K J 4 2
♣ Q 8 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ A K 9 8 6
♦ A 10 8 6
♣ 10 9 |
♠ J 7 2
♥ J 7 3
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ J 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 9 8 5 3
♥ 10 5 2
♦ Q
♣ A K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
You passed over two diamonds since double would have been for takeout. Now you have to set two diamonds by the maximum. With what look to be natural trump tricks, there is no need to go active with the lead of the spade ace. I would lead a fourth-highest heart, assuming that if a trump shift proves necessary, it can be done later.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4
♥ J 7 4 2
♦ Q 9 6 4
♣ J 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
2♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 14th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
Recently my partner sprang a new bid on me and caught me flat-footed. With no one vulnerable at teams I held ♠ J-4, ♥ Q-6-5-2, ♦ Q-7-5 3, ♣ K-J-2, and passed over my RHO's one club. My LHO bid one spade. Now after a two club call to my right, the auction was passed around to my partner, who came back to life with two spades. Is this call natural or a cue-bid, and what range this show?
Table Presents, Vancouver, Wash.
Two spades is a natural call (partner would double one spade or two clubs for takeout with the red suits). I expect him to hold around an opening bid with five spades, and I think you are not quite worth a move forward. So you should pass, but if you did bid (make the diamond queen the ace), a natural and invitational two no-trump would fit the bill.
I dealt and passed vulnerable with ♠ K-10-6-4-3, ♥ K-J-9-2, ♦ —, ♣ K-10-3-2, and heard my partner open two no-trump. When I bid Stayman (do you agree?), he responded three spades, and I'm not sure what to do next. We stumbled into the making spade slam, but can you suggest how this auction should have gone?
Sticky Fingers, Albuquerque, N.M.
After the three-spade response, four of a minor and four no-trump are natural calls. Four hearts should be subverted to a slam-try in spades — nothing to do with hearts. Now a subsequent four-no-trump call is Blackwood. Immediate new-suit jumps are shortage agreeing partner's major. None of these approaches really fit your hand — but might a jump to six hearts over three spades, show a void looking for seven spades? Warning — don't try this at home!
What is the right rebid after opening one diamond and hearing partner respond one spade when holding: ♠ J, ♥ K-Q-9-5, ♦ K-Q-7-5, ♣ Q-J-8-3?
Lagging Behind, Pierre, S.D.
|
If you raise one spade to two frequently with three trumps and a semibalanced hand, then bidding one no-trump with a singleton may be acceptable, my choice. If your one-no-trump rebid normally promises a balanced hand, you have to bid two clubs now — not two hearts, which shows an ace more than you hold. The two-club response should still let you find hearts if partner is strong — a fourth suit bid from him will let you raise hearts.
My question relates to the right way to respond to a forcing jump-shift with three trumps and a balanced hand. I had ♠ 10-4-3, ♥ A-4, ♦ K-Q-6-5, ♣ K-J-6-3. I opened one diamond, and my partner responded two spades. I bid two no-trump before raising spades, but my partner did not believe I had three trumps to do that. What do you think?
Fatal Delay, Perryville, Mo.
You are right and your partner wrong here. With a balanced minimum and guards in all suits, you want to make the natural and limiting rebid, rather than raise spades and find partner hoping that you have extras.
My partner, in first seat, opened one diamond and I held ♠ Q-7-4-2, ♥ A-J-2, ♦ A-10-9, ♣ A-J-2. With a stopper in every suit, I jumped to three no-trump to show my values. There was no catastrophe in that we made 11 tricks. But I was soundly criticized for not bidding my four-card major. Do you agree?
Paint your Wagon, Youngstown, Ohio
Your choice was reasonable; but you could have missed slam facing a minimum unbalanced hand with spades and diamonds (and on a bad day, three no-trump would also fail!). The same applies if you find yourself facing a singleton spade and long diamonds. Basically, you took a risk with very little upside, since by pre-empting your side unnecessarily, you make the exchange of information somewhat harder.
|
September 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Human kind cannot bear very much reality.
T.S. Eliot
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8
♥ 9 5
♦ J 9 2
♣ K J 7 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 7 4
♥ 8 6 3
♦ 7 6 5 3
♣ 9 6 |
♠ J 9 3 2
♥ A 10 7 4 2
♦ Q 10 4
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ K 6 5
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 8
♣ A Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥8
Your partner has suggested about 17 HCP here, typically 5-4 in the minors, and your builders in the diamond suit, coupled with an ace, suggest you have just enough to raise to three no-trump. If you aren't going to bid game, a retreat to three diamonds would probably be in order.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 3 2
♥ A 10 7 4 2
♦ Q 10 4
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
A few years ago Andrew Robson published a thoughtful bridge tip to the effect that if a player who has pre-empted leads his own suit against a trump contract, you should consider playing him to have a singleton trump.
Joey Silver produced an interesting line of play following through on that line of thought. In four spades he saw East overtake the lead of the heart jack with the queen. Now it seems natural to cash the spade queen, then play a second spade toward dummy, and hope to guess well. The odds seem very close between the drop and the finesse. At the other table declarer played to dummy’s ace and went one down.
Silver did better when he ducked the first trick, leaving East on play. He knew this particular East would not have seven hearts, and hoped that East would reveal a little more about his side-suit shape.
Had East shifted to a club, for example, it would have been a fair bet that he had a singleton, and thus not a singleton trump. East might also have been tempted to shift to a diamond if he had a doubleton, allowing Silver to build up a count on the hand. When East actually continued with a second heart, Silver correctly inferred that East had at least three diamonds and at least two clubs. The spade finesse had become the indicated play, so Silver duly played the spade king and a spade to dummy’s 10, scoring up his game.