October 27th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The tigers of wrath are wiser than the horses of instruction.
William Blake
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 9 5 3
♥ Q 9
♦ 7 6
♣ A Q 10 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6
♥ 8 5 4 3
♦ A K 2
♣ J 8 4 |
♠ K
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ J 10 9 8 3
♣ K 9 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 7 4 2
♥ A K 6
♦ Q 5 4
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game forcing, with spades
♦K
This hand is more about tactics than it is about anything else. While your side could have two tricks to take against a slam, the odds favor the opponents being able to make 12 tricks in hearts. You should try to prevent them from bidding slam, and while caution may be appropriate if vulnerable, I would simply raise to three spades if nonvulnerable. Maybe LHO will now bid four hearts to end the auction?
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 3
♥ J 2
♦ 10 9 7 2
♣ 9 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
If you pass in first seat, when should you double an opening bid to your right? If fourth hand opens a minor, should you strain to come back into the auction with a maximum pass?
Comeback Kid, Memphis, Tenn.
Beginners (and even some experienced players) frequently err here by entering the auction unnecessarily, doubling with off-shape hands to show their points. If your partner passes in third seat, especially when nonvulnerable, why would you come into an auction where you know you are outgunned? Only double with classical shape, not just the excuse of "11 points, partner!"
As West I held ♠ A-K-10-7-2, ♥ —, ♦ A-5, ♣ K-J-10-8-7-3. I opened one club with nobody vulnerable, intending to bid spades twice. My RHO over-called one heart, and my partner bid two clubs, natural and nonforcing. My RHO jumped to four hearts. What should my next bid be?
Much the Miller, East Brunswick, N.J.
I'd bid five spades over four hearts, and if they sacrifice in six hearts I would make a forcing pass. A call of four spades by me may never be passed out, but that doesn't get my slam-going values across. Freak deals don't help you judge all that much in real life, but here you should appreciate that this hand rates to offer excellent play for a black-suit slam facing as little as four clubs to the ace.
Should you use Stayman in response to a one-no-trump or two-no-trump opening whenever you have a four-card major and the values for game? Or should you reserve it for use only on unbalanced hands?
Question Mark, Portland, Ore.
It is true that when you are balanced with surplus values for game and a poor four-card major, you might consider playing in no-trump, not a suit. Similarly, with secondary honors in your short suits, there may be no value in taking a ruff, because your holding may solidify partner there. Otherwise, Stayman tends to be the percentage action.
|
I opened one spade in second seat with ♠ A-Q-8-7-3, ♥ K-5, ♦ Q-9-8-5, ♣ K-J, feeling that my 5-4 shape was unsuitable for opening one no-trump. After a two-club overcall to my left, my partner raised to two spades and RHO joined in with three clubs. How would you rate my options of passing, bidding three diamonds, or three spades?
Sail Away, Bellingham, Wash.
Three diamonds is a game-try for spades — your badly placed club honors make you just a little short of the values for that. Your slight extra distribution makes bidding three spades as a purely competitive maneuver logical enough, though. I think most experts would take the push here — and very few would open one no-trump. Try to avoid taking that action with most 5-4-2-2 patterns and decent suits, especially with a long major.
Given that it is traditional to play a response of four no-trump to an opening no-trump call as quantitative, what is the consensus on using Stayman, then bidding four no-trump over a major-suit response? If that is quantitative, how do you agree on partner's suit and ask for aces?
Reach for the Stars, Willoughby, Ohio
If you use four clubs as Gerber after finding a major opposite, a direct four-no-trump call remains quantitative. A call of three of the OTHER major by responder after Stayman can sensibly be subverted for use as a balanced artificial slam-try, agreeing partner's suit. That allows a subsequent call of four no-trump to be Keycard Blackwood. Direct new-suit jumps remain splinters agreeing partner's suit.
|
October 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.
Henry David Thoreau
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 10
♦ A K 8 6 3
♣ 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ 2
♦ J 9 7 4 2
♣ A K J 9 3 |
♠ K 8 7
♥ J 9 7 3
♦ Q 10 5
♣ Q 8 5 |
| South |
♠ J 10 6 3
♥ K Q 8 6 5 4
♦ —
♣ 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 NT* |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Minors, 7-11
♣K
It is tempting to jump to three no-trump, but the absence of spot cards in your long suits suggests that caution would be wise. A simple raise to two no-trump is enough, since your partner has suggested values in the range of 6-10 HCP. Change the diamond three to the 10 and you might contemplate doing more.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 10
♦ A K 8 6 3
♣ 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
I went to a bookstore and asked the saleswoman where the self-help section was. She said if she told me, it would defeat the purpose.
George Carlin
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3 2
♥ K Q 7 5
♦ J 8 2
♣ Q 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 10 8 2
♦ K Q 10 9 7 6 5
♣ 10 7 2 |
♠ 8 6
♥ J 9 6 4 3
♦ 3
♣ K J 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 9 7 5
♥ A
♦ A 4
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Your partner has shown six diamonds and five spades and not a huge hand. (He could have bid two spades at his second turn or jumped to three spades over one no-trump.) My best guess would be to let sleeping dogs lie and pass two spades. Correcting to three diamonds might improve the contract — but you really do not want to hear partner bid again!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6
♥ J 9 6 4 3
♦ 3
♣ K J 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The last thing one knows in constructing a work is what to put first.
Blaise Pascal
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K J 9
♥ 8 5
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 3
♥ 9 2
♦ Q 10 6 4
♣ 10 4 3 |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ K Q 7 3
♦ 9 8 3
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A J 10 6 4
♦ A K J 5
♣ K 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦4
The jump to four clubs suggests a very strong hand with spade fit and a singleton club. It looks natural to bid four spades — but just think how much better your trumps are than they might be. With nothing to cue-bid, maybe the best way to get the nature of your hand across is by jumping to five spades. Such jumps typically either show really bad trumps, or as here, very good trumps but nothing else to show.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 9
♥ 8 5
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Distrust all in whom the impulse to punish is powerful.
Friedrich Nietzsche
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 9 7 5
♥ Q 8 4 2
♦ A K 10 5
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 6
♥ J 10
♦ J 8 3
♣ A K J 9 4 |
♠ K 10 3 2
♥ K 9 3
♦ Q 9 4
♣ 8 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 8 4
♥ A 7 6 5
♦ 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
All pass |
♣K
With a dead minimum and only four hearts, it looks normal enough to pass your partner's invitational call of three hearts. But if your partner has both clubs and hearts, as you would expect — since the only other hand-type he might have is a balanced 18-count — maybe your fitting cards in clubs make you just worth a raise to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4
♥ A 7 6 5
♦ 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 21st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Calvin: I’m a misunderstood genius. Hobbes: What’s misunderstood? Calvin: Nobody thinks I’m a genius.
Bill Watterson
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ —
♥ K Q 9 8 6 3
♦ 9 5
♣ A 10 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ A 5
♦ A K 8 7 6 4 3 2
♣ Q 5 |
♠ 8 6 3 2
♥ J 10 7
♦ Q J
♣ K J 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 9 5 4
♥ 4 2
♦ 10
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 4♠ |
5♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦K
You may not agree with the opening call of two hearts; but as long as the heart suit is good and you have a side-suit, you won't be at a disadvantage. The question is how to show the hand now. The answer is to jump to four clubs, which suggests this pattern and lets your partner go wherever he wants.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ K Q 9 8 6 3
♦ 9 5
♣ A 10 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 20th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
We should look long and carefully at ourselves before we pass judgment on others.
Moliere
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A K
♥ A J 6 4
♦ K 10 2
♣ J 8 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 2
♥ K Q 9
♦ Q J 8 7 4
♣ A Q 10 |
♠ 10 9 8 7 3
♥ 7 3 2
♦ 5 3
♣ 9 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 5 4
♥ 10 8 5
♦ A 9 6
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 NT |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
While a case could be made for a club lead, in a sense the only person who has bid clubs is East. North's one club didn't really show clubs here, so I would be tempted to lead the spade nine, on the grounds that this is the suit least likely to cost a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ Q 10 2
♦ J 3 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 19th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
What sort of values would you associate with the advance to one no-trump facing an overcall? Specifically, with: ♠ A-5-3-2, ♥ A-Q-9-8-5, ♦ K-2, ♣ J-4, would you overcall one heart over one club or would you double? And if you overcall and your partner responds one no-trump, what should you do next?
Entry-Level, Pueblo, Colo.
I don't hate doubling one club, but I would overcall and hope to find a way back into spades if appropriate. Your partner's one-no-trump call could be anywhere in the 7-11 range. I would guess to pass now, but if I could bid a second suit economically, I would do that.
Say you hold decent values and three-card support for your partner, the opening bidder, after a double to your right. Should I redouble, or to make some other call? With: ♠ 7-6-2, ♥ A-6, ♦ A-9-8-4-2, ♣ K-9-3, what is your best call after your partner opens one spade, and your RHO doubles? Do you raise partner, bid your suit, or redouble to show strength?
Call Waiting, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
Without the double I'd go through the forcing no-trump (if I had it available) to show a limit raise, rather than force to game. My bad trumps mean I should pull in a notch here. Over a double, redouble shows 10 or more, tending to deny spade support. So I would redouble, then raise spades — indirectly suggesting good values but bad trumps.
What is the difference between an Eastern and a Western Cue-bid? Are both methods still in common usage — and are these still the common names for these calls?
Bicoastal, Worcester, Mass.
|
Before I answer, I remember the days when cue-bids below three no-trump showed a control in the opponent's suit and a slam-going hand! These days, most cheap cue-bids are attempts to reach three no-trump. Western Cue-bids are attempts to get to no-trump by asking partner for a stopper or half-stopper in the opponent's suit. Eastern Cue-bids are less popular in that they actually suggest a stopper.
My partner and I play weak-twos and are wondering whether we should play a convention recommended to us called McCabe, after the opponents double or overcall our bid?
Gas Fitter, Saint John's, Newfoundland
After a double of a weak-two, but not after an overcall — since you now rate to be on lead — one can play a redouble as strong, with raises natural and pre-emptive. New suits are natural and to play at the two-level, but lead-directing at the three-level, guaranteeing at least a partial fit, while jumps show decent suits together with a real fit for partner. To bail out into your own suit, bid two no-trump to puppet three clubs from your partner. Then you can name the final contract or show a high-card raise in your partner's suit.
I would like our partnership to have a simple rule to the effect that all doubles of our opponents' artificial trump raises (such as Drury or Bergen) request the lead of that suit. But is it ever better to play such doubles as takeout of the opponent's known suit?
Whacked Out, Charleston, S.C.
You should double an artificial no-trump response for takeout of the bid suit, but the blanket rule for all other sequences might well be to use value-showing doubles as lead-directing. The only exception might be to use the double of an artificial call that shows a raise with less than limit values as takeout of the agreed suit.
|
October 18th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Fortune is like the market, where many times, if you can stay a little, the price will fall.
Francis Bacon
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K J
♥ K J 6 4
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ K Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5 3 2
♥ 10 9 8 2
♦ Q 3
♣ A 7 |
♠ —
♥ A Q 7 5 3
♦ K J 7 4
♣ 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 9 7 4
♥ —
♦ A 5 2
♣ 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥10
Please do not double one club here. With only two spades, your hand is totally unsuitable for that action. Since an overcall of one no-trump would be a wild overbid, pass and hope to find a way to come back into the auction. Just remember that you are never obligated to overcall just because you have opening values – and that overcalling with a weak four-card suit may lead to tears before bedtime.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J
♥ K J 6 4
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ K Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Last month we looked at some deals that had cropped up in the early stages of the world championships in Bali in September 2013. This week's deals all occurred toward the end of the championships.
The first deal exemplifies the concept that defensive signaling cannot be reduced to a simple question of attitude — whether you like or do not like partner’s lead. A thoughtful defender will signal by reference to the whole hand and what partner is likely to switch to if given the chance.
Today’s deal comes from the last qualifying match of the Senior round-robin with Netherlands needing a big win to qualify, which they duly managed to do. This board helped their cause.
In one room, where Bep Vriend was declarer, West led a top diamond against four hearts, and East contributed the jack, suggesting a sequence but denying the queen. West naturally switched to a heart, and now the contract came home. Vriend won the queen, cashed the ace and queen of trumps and pitched a diamond from dummy on the third heart. West’s defense was unsuccessful but well-reasoned, since if East had the heart king rather than the jack, this is exactly how he would have defended, and the heart shift would have been mandatory.
In the other room, Chris Niemeijer led a high diamond as well, and when Louk Verhees Senior signaled encouragement, West continued diamonds. Now four hearts had to go one down, losing one further trick in each black suit.