August 13th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If you never get a second chance at something you didn't take a first chance at? That's true failure.
C. Joybell C.
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 6 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ J 9 8 7 6
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ K 10 8 |
♠ 8 7
♥ K 5 3
♦ K 3 2
♣ J 6 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 9 5 3
♥ 10
♦ A J 8 5
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
The simple route here is to double — which is a balanced penalty-oriented action. Your partner will almost never remove the double. But if you want to find a major-suit fit and do not want to risk defending when dummy puts down long running clubs, then cuebid two clubs. This is take-out suggesting the majors, and implicitly limited by your failure to double, and would be my choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 6 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 12th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
You might as well fall on your face as lean over too far backwards.
James Thurber
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 4 3
♥ J 10 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ K Q J 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ K 9 4
♦ 10 4
♣ 10 6 5 4 |
♠ 9 7 6 5 2
♥ 8 6 5
♦ Q J 9 8
♣ A |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A Q 7 2
♦ A K 6 3
♣ 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠Q
When considering giving false preference back to two spades on auctions like this, consider two things. Would you be happy if partner made a try for game, and are your values in partner's long or short suit? If the answer to either question is yes, false-preference does make sense. If not, pass. Here, passing two hearts looks right to me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ J 10 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ K Q J 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 11th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
'You oughtn't to yield to temptation.' ‘Well, somebody must, or the thing becomes absurd.’
Anthony Hope
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 10 8 3
♥ K Q 3
♦ 10
♣ Q J 10 9 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J 6 5 2
♥ 8 6 2
♦ K 9 8 4
♣ — |
♠ 7
♥ 9 7 5 4
♦ Q 6 5
♣ K 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A J 7 3 2
♣ A 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2♠ |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
When in doubt, lead from a four-card major, not a four-card minor on blind auctions like this. So are you in doubt here? I think so. The diamonds are better, but by no means safe, so I'd lead a heart. However, switch the hearts and the clubs, and I might lead from my three-card suit and eschew both minors.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3
♥ J 6 4 2
♦ K J 9 6
♣ 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
August 10th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I opened one club, holding ♠ A-J-3, ♥ Q-5-2, ♦ Q-9, ♣ A-J-9-3-2. My LHO overcalled one diamond, which my partner doubled (negative). Should I have rebid my clubs, introduced my spades, or tried one no-trump?
Off-Target, Fredericksburg, Va.
A rebid of one no-trump suggests a balanced 12-14 and doesn't guarantee a great diamond stopper. You would prefer to have more in diamonds, but since a two-club call would strongly suggest a six-card suit and bidding a three-card major would be somewhat misleading. If the opponents bid diamonds again, you can balance with two hearts to suggest only three trumps.
I picked up ♠ 10-8-6-3, ♥ A-Q-5, ♦ Q-10-5, ♣ 10-8-3, and heard my partner open one club. With a balanced hand and a feeble suit, I responded one no-trump. My expert partner told me after the game that while it is acceptable to bypass a four-card major if the opponents come in with a double, you should be wary of doing so in an uncontested auction. What do you think?
Skip Tracer, Phoenix, Ariz.
Bypassing a weak four-card major with honors in each of the other suits is reasonable. And facing a passed partner, where the risk of playing a 4-3 major is far higher your call would be quite reasonable. In competition, your choice becomes even clearer, since spades may well be splitting badly, even if you find a 4-4 fit. Also, partner will be more inclined to raise with three, expecting your suit to be sturdier.
As an inexperienced player I seek clarification on the difference between a splinter and a cuebid. If both "conventions" are used in tandem, how is one able to tell the difference? I apologize if this is a clear point that I have missed, but the game gets more complicated the more you know or think you know.
Tangled Up, Bremerton, Wash.
A splinter bid is a jump that shows support for the suit partner has just bid, game values, and a singleton or void in the suit called. Normally, it consists of an unnecessary jump in an auction where a bid of the same suit at a lower level would have been forcing. A cue-bid is rarely a jump bid, and typically shows a control — though this could be based either on shortage or the possession of the ace or king. So there is an overlap.
|
Recently I was in fourth seat, with six clubs to the K-10, and queen-third of spades, with two small doubletons. After the opponents bid one heart – one no-trump – two diamonds – two hearts, I risked a three-club call, which might well have made. But when my LHO bid three hearts, my partner doubled, and this rolled home. Am I barred from protecting at pairs with a weak hand, in case partner doubles for penalties, or is partner barred from doubling here in case I have a weak hand?
Monkey King, Dallas, Texas
I'd consider bidding unwise, not because the opponents might compete to three hearts, but because I'd expect to go for a penalty myself. The hand on your right surely has no great length in spades, hearts or diamonds, thus has a minimum of four clubs. He may well be delighted that he is out of a misfitting auction (the two-heart bid does not imply a fit) and will have something to sink his teeth into.
Holding six diamonds, five hearts, two singletons, and 11 points, my partner opened one diamond and, after my one-spade response, rebid two hearts. As this would normally show 16 points, is this the best way to bid such a hand? Or would a repeat of the hearts show the 5-6 pattern but cancel the message of extra strength for one of extra shape?
Lord Chesterfield, Newport News, Va.
Even experts disagree here. You can shade a reverse with extra shape, as in the example you give. However 11 points is too weak for this. Your choices are to open and rebid in diamonds, or to bid the hearts first and lie about suit lengths. I'd tend to open the major unless it is honorless and looked more like four. Neither route is perfect, but to conceal a five-card major twice while rebidding a minor is generally worse than misleading partner over your respective suit lengths.
|
August 9th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Wherever we go, across the Pacific or Atlantic, we meet, not similarity so much as the bizarre. Things astonish us, when we travel, that surprise nobody else.
Mary Ritter Beard
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A J 7
♥ 10 8 7 5
♦ A 10 9 8 4
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ K 9 6 |
♠ 6 3
♥ K J 9 6
♦ K Q J
♣ Q J 5 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 2
♥ 3
♦ 5 3
♣ A 10 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
2 NT |
3♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣6
Your partner's two-club call is natural and nonforcing. Should you go back to spades here? I think so, though it is very close. Admittedly, your partner could rebid a chunky five-card spade suit, so he is as likely to have clubs equal to or longer than his spades. But you do have only three clubs, and he will be expecting more.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5 4
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ K 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 8th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism.
Sir William Osler
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A K 9 6
♥ 8 7
♦ 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 4 3 2
♥ Q J 4
♦ A K Q J
♣ — |
♠ 7 5
♥ 3 2
♦ 10 9 8 6 5
♣ J 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J
♥ A K 10 9 6 5
♦ 4
♣ A K 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
6♣ |
All pass |
♦K
It looks simple to bid one spade rather than redouble, since you really cannot expect to defend successfully to both red suits. The one-spade call is simply natural and unlimited except by the original pass. One other possible call is a fit-jump to two spades, though that would typically show five spades and four clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 6
♥ 8 7
♦ 7 3 2
♣ Q 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Had I said that, had I done this, So might I gain, so might I miss.
Robert Browning
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K Q 7 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ J 9 7 3 2
♦ —
♣ 10 7 6 5 4 |
♠ 10 6 3 2
♥ K Q 10 8
♦ K 5
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A 5
♦ J 9 7 6 4 2
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| Rdbl. |
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
I'm fairly conservative on the subject of opening 11-counts, but this is a hand that cries out to be opened. With an easy rebid over partner's likely one-heart response, and all my values in my long suits (with a couple of strategically placed 10s), I would deem this to be a far better hand than a balanced 12-count.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ 8 2 |
August 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
It doesn't matter if you're born in a duck yard, so long as you are hatched from a swan's egg!
Hans Christian Andersen
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K Q J
♥ A J 10
♦ 9 8 5
♣ 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 6 2
♥ 9 7 5 2
♦ 10 4
♣ A Q 2 |
♠ 8
♥ K Q 6 4 3
♦ Q J 7 3 2
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ 7 5 4 3
♥ 8
♦ A K 6
♣ K J 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 2♣* |
Pass |
2♦** |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Natural, 11-15 HCP.
**Inquiry
♦10
Your partner's double emphasizes takeout. There is some merit in considering going to the six-level, but with no first-round controls, your objective is to reach your best game. You might just bid five hearts at pairs, but you can also show a two-suiter with a call of four no-trump. Partner will assume the minors and you will correct his five-club call to five diamonds to reach the better red-suit fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ K Q 6 4 3
♦ Q J 7 3 2
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Pass |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Everyone suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal virtues, and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people that I have ever known.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 5
♥ K 8 7 5 4
♦ A 6 4
♣ K 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ A 9 3
♦ J 10 9 3
♣ A 10 5 2 |
♠ A 10 9 8 6
♥ Q 10
♦ K 8 7 5
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ Q J 4 2
♥ J 6 2
♦ Q 2
♣ Q 9 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠7
You are way too good for a bid of three no-trump, and a case could be made for a simple bid of six clubs. But your partner might have stretched to get his clubs in without real extras, so start with a cuebid of three diamonds, planning to find a forcing club raise at your next turn one way or another.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ K 8 7 5 4
♦ A 6 4
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
2♦ |
3♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, July 21st, 2014
I to my perils Of cheat and charmer Came clad in armour By stars benign.
A.E. Housman
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ A 3
♦ A Q 9 6
♣ A J 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ 8 7 5 4
♦ J 5 2
♣ 9 8 7 4 |
♠ K Q 9 8 4
♥ K Q J 6 2
♦ K 10 8
♣ — |
| South |
♠ A J 10
♥ 10 9
♦ 7 4 3
♣ K Q 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
| 3♣ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
With a choice of unacceptable alternatives here, on an auction where declarer rates to have club and heart length and partner seems unlikely to have that much in spades, a club is the best shot at a passive lead. A spade seems likely to give up a natural trick in the suit but is hardly less attractive. There might be a case for the diamond ace, but I'm just not brave enough.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 8 5 3
♥ Q 4
♦ A 10 6 4
♣ 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♣ |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
When West leads a low trump against six spades what should your plan be, as East follows to the first round of trump?
Rather than focusing on the deficiencies of dummy when it comes to high cards, you should concentrate on the deal, and realize that you have an inevitable diamond loser but can ruff two of your diamonds in dummy. You can make your slam by relying on either one of the club or heart finesses (each one in principle being a 50% chance).
However if you can, you should seek to find a way to combine those two chances. Your secondary chance here is to ruff out the heart king in three rounds; you will combine this with the club finesse.
So you win the trump lead, cash the heart ace and ruff a heart high. You then cross to the spade jack (drawing the last trump) and ruff another heart. Next you give up a diamond, preparing for two diamond ruffs in the dummy. If the heart king fell from either defender, you will discard the club queen on the established heart winner after taking a diamond ruff. Otherwise you will finesse the club queen, taking your second chance. Just for the record, your additional chance improves your original 50 percent odds to 60 percent — not to be sneezed at.
This problem comes from a bridge book for beginners (this being one of the tougher hands), Planning the Play of a Bridge Hand, by Barbara Seagram & David Bird.