August 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I know that if I open the bidding and jump to two no-trump over a one-level suit response, it shows 18-19 points or maybe a good 17. Does that also apply after partner responds one no-trump (whether the call is forcing or nonforcing)? I thought that this could be slightly less — maybe 16-17.
Finagler, Newark, N.J.
The values for the two-no-trump call remain the same, no matter what the response — though it depends slightly on your range for the one-no-trump response. Some play the response of one no-trump to one club as 8-10 (not a very popular style anymore) when the raise to two no-trump could be a little lighter.
Could you give me an unbiased summary of what discarding method you would recommend for a beginner to duplicate? Ease of recall should be a factor!
Help Wanted, Nashville, Tenn.
Standard signals, where you throw high cards in the suit you like, are easy to abuse — because one tends to let go cards one cannot afford, often to tell partner something he knows already. The same applies to a lesser degree to reverse signals. There are three equivalent methods I do not have space to discuss in detail: Lavinthal (or suit-preference), revolving discards, and odd-even discards. Each uses a discard in one suit to indicate which of the other suits you prefer. I think odd-even is slightly the most flexible. Check out the Cornhusker Bridge website for more information.
I know about negative doubles by responder at his first turn, but would you clarify what a double by responder on the second round should mean after his LHO comes into the auction. For example, after the auction 1 ♦ — Pass — 1 ♠ — (2 ♣) — Pass — Pass, is my hand suitable for a double, holding: ♠ A-Q-6-4, ♥ K-6-5, ♦ Q-9-5-4, ♣ J-3? Or should I simply raise diamonds?
In a Rut, Casper, Wyo.
Here an invitational jump to three diamonds would not be absurd (you may have 12 points, but your hand does not suggest game will be easy your way). If you double, that is for takeout — typically not very short in clubs, though. If you double and subsequently raise diamonds, it would suggest a good hand, though maybe only three-card support.
|
I have decided to teach an intermediate class on basic bidding. I want them to understand the general rules on what auctions are forcing and what are nonforcing. Just for the record, most of these students don't play 2/1. In current bidding rules, is it true that a new suit by opener is forcing for one round if responder has introduced a new suit at the two-level — and does that also apply by a passed hand?
Faust, Eau Claire, Wis.
Your first statement is true, but there may not be clear agreement in the second instance. The answer is yes, but it is more about partnership agreement than anything else. The logic is that opener is unlimited, and should not have to jump to create a force. I agree that the two-level response by a passed hand shows values, but does not guarantee a second call after opener has shown a minimum hand.
How would you rate the possible courses of action on this unopposed sequence: 1 ♣ – 1 ♥ – 1 ♠ – 3 ♣? As dealer I had: ♠ A-Q-10-5, ♥ 8-5, ♦ 9, ♣ A-Q-10-8-3-2 and passed because I held a minimum in high cards, but my partner suggested I should have reraised to four clubs with my extra shape.
Timid Tim, Lincoln, N.H.
Your hand is worth driving all the way to five clubs. With your extra shape and prime honors in your long suits, there are probably more hands where game is laydown or on a finesse, than where it is not. For example, give partner as little as a black king plus an ace, with a doubleton spade. Respect your extra club length and fine honor structure — this would be a far worse hand with queen-fourth of spades and the bare diamond ace.
|
August 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Diplomacy means the art of nearly deceiving all your friends, but not quite deceiving all your enemies.
Kofi Busia
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6
♥ A K 5 3
♦ A
♣ A 10 9 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3
♥ J 7 4
♦ K 9 4 3 2
♣ K J 5 |
♠ K 9 8 2
♥ 10 9 8 2
♦ 10 8 7
♣ Q 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 5 4
♥ Q 6
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣* |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
*Strong
♦3
This would be a harder problem if your partner were not a passed hand, As it is, you should play the double as takeout and bid two diamonds. Personally, I play that even by a passed hand this is a rare double of one no-trump for takeout, not penalty. Even if partner is strong, either opener or responder will be running to safety — or you won't have your bid. Either way, a penalty double won't get you rich.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 7 5 4
♥ Q 6
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1♠ |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 1st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Those whose conduct gives room for talk are always the first to attack their neighbors.
Moliere
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q
♥ A K 10
♦ Q J 9 5 3 2
♣ A 10 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ 7 5 3 2
♦ K 7
♣ J 9 5 3 2 |
♠ K J 10 7 6 4
♥ 8 6 4
♦ A 8
♣ Q 4 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ Q J 9
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
The point here needs to be made occasionally, if only to reinforce it to everyone: Bidding a major over a one-diamond overcall promises a minimum of just four cards. But if the opponents overcall one heart, you double with four spades and bid the suit with five. So bid one spade here, rather than make a negative double, which would guarantee both majors, typically with four cards in each.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 3
♥ Q J 9
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 31st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, July 17th, 2014
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.
Edward Phelps
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 8 3 2
♥ J 8 7 3
♦ 10 8 6 4
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 4 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ Q 5 4 2
♦ K J
♣ A J 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 9 7 6
♥ A K 10 6
♦ A Q
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♣4
On this auction there is a very good case to play three clubs as your second negative and not two no-trump. The logic is that, with three no-trump a very likely final contract, you want the strong hand to be declarer — so the lead runs up to it, rather than coming through it. Therefore, I would bid three clubs here to deny values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Pride is a tricky, glorious, double-edged feeling.
Adrienne Rich
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 8 6
♥ A Q 6 5 2
♦ K Q 2
♣ A Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 2
♥ K J 7 4
♦ J 8 7 5
♣ K 10 2 |
♠ K Q J 4 3
♥ 10 3
♦ 10 9 6 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
♠ A 9 7 5
♥ 9 8
♦ A 3
♣ 8 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
It is surely right to bid here; the question is what to bid. A call of two diamonds, planning to back in with two spades over two hearts, is quite reasonable, but it does leave the opponents more room than a direct call of two spades. For that reason, and fr its lead-directing value, I prefer to bid the major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 4 3
♥ 10 3
♦ 10 9 6 4
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 29th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Great men, great nations, have not been boasters and buffoons, but perceivers of the terror of life, and have manned themselves to face it.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ Q 5
♥ A 7 5 4 3 2
♦ K 10 6 5
♣ 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8 7 3 2
♥ —
♦ Q 9 2
♣ K Q J 7 |
♠ 9 6
♥ K Q 10
♦ A J 8 7 3
♣ 10 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ J 9 8 6
♦ 4
♣ A 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣K
I'm aware that I'm eligible for my AARP card. I hope I'm not betraying my age when I say I consider my hearts a less appropriate suit for a weak-two bid than most, and I would be concerned at opening this suit in second seat at any vulnerability. Even in first seat, I'd prefer to have the 10-9 in my suit before I open it. In third seat, nonvulnerable, anything goes.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ A 7 5 4 3 2
♦ K 10 6 5
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 28th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
The combat deepens. On ye brave, Who rush to glory or the grave.
Thomas Campbell
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 6
♥ A K 9 5 3
♦ J 10
♣ A 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4
♥ 8 6
♦ K Q 9 8 3
♣ K 6 5 2 |
♠ Q 3 2
♥ Q J 10 2
♦ 7 5 4
♣ J 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 7 5
♥ 7 4
♦ A 6 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♦K
Had your partner not doubled the final contract, you would dutifully have led a spade. So does your partner's double simply try to increase the penalty he expects to get? I think not. The double should indicate he has another very good suit and wants you to try to find it. The odds favor that suit to be clubs, so I would lead the club nine, and have my excuses ready if partner has K-Q-9-fifth of diamonds.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ Q 9 8 3 2
♦ J 10 6 4
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
July 27th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
What value should I put on 10s when determining whether to invite or drive to game in no-trump after my partner has opened one no-trump?
Combination Lock, Jackson, Tenn.
The Milton Work count (A=4, K=3, Q=2, J=1) is universally the most popular method, and is pretty good at providing a guide for balanced hands. But it gives no value to 10s, which are often valuable in no-trump contracts when allied with higher honors. When you respond to one no-trump, the presence of a 10 with one top honor in a five-card suit is worth at least half a point. When it comes to a close decision, the presence of a couple of 10s, and indeed 9s, might sway you toward optimism.
Recently I picked up ♠ 9-6-5-4-3, ♥ A-J-7-5, ♦ 9-5, ♣ Q-J, and heard my partner open one no-trump. I used Stayman and passed the response of two hearts. Nine tricks were the limit on the hand, but my partner felt I had undercooked it. Was he right?
Culinary Institute, Texarkana, Texas
I agree with your partner. My plan after Stayman would be to bid two no-trump over a two-diamond response, to raise two hearts to three hearts, and to raise a two-spade response to game! So you would have done better than I on this hand.
I have recently learned the forcing no-trump in response to an opening bid of one of a major. My partner wants to play it in response to an opening in third and fourth seats too. Would you recommend this treatment?
The Force Be With You, Anchorage, Alaska
I would not recommend going that way. The forcing no-trump allows you to show strong balanced invitations in no-trump or partner's major, which are impossible hand-types for a passed hand. With trump support you bid two clubs (Drury); with a balanced hand you bid one no-trump, then two no-trump (if you get another turn). The upside of playing one no-trump nonforcing is to be able to stop there with two balanced hands facing each another.
|
I opened one club with ♠ Q-10-3, ♥ J-5-2, ♦ A-9, ♣ A-J-4-3-2. My LHO made a one-heart overcall, and now my partner produced a negative double. How would you compare the merits of rebidding clubs, introducing spades, and rebidding one no-trump?
Weight and See, Santa Fe, N.M.
A one-no-trump rebid would suggest 12-14, without guaranteeing a great heart stop. You'd prefer to have more in hearts, but beggars cannot be choosers. This is especially so since a two-club call strongly suggests a six-card suit, while bidding a three-card spade suit — except in dire emergency — is not an action I would advocate. Make the heart jack the diamond jack, and you might do so.
I was in second seat at matchpoint pairs with ♠ K-J-3, ♥ A-Q-7-4, ♦ 7-6-4, ♣ A-Q-10. What is the correct bid with this hand after a one-diamond opening to your right? Could you comment on the merits of pass, double, or an overcall of one heart or even one no-trump?
Thin White Duke, Newark, Calif.
You must act, but normally overcalling one no-trump without a stopper is a bad idea. Still, I prefer that action to overcalling one heart with low offense, but defensive tricks galore. I would double and not worry about the flat shape — partner can provide that, on a good or even an average day.
|
July 26th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I began to suspect that the ultimate sacrifice isn't death after all; the ultimate sacrifice is willingly bearing the fullest penalty for your own actions.
Orson Scott Card
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 4
♥ K 6 4
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ J 10 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 5
♥ J 10 9 5 2
♦ 8
♣ A 7 3 |
♠ K J 7
♥ A Q 8 3
♦ J 9 5
♣ K 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A 10 6 3 2
♥ 7
♦ A Q 10 4 2
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥* |
| 2♥ |
4♥ |
4 NT |
Dbl. |
| 5♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
* Playing four-card majors
♥J
I can see a reasonable case for passing, retreating to three diamonds, or bidding game. It feels like landing on a pinhead to pass, so one should either opt for safety or go for the big prize. My choice would be to bid three no-trump because of that diamond 10 and the aces, which argue that partner might come to nine tricks even when we only have a single guard in one of the side-suits.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 6 3 2
♥ 7
♦ A Q 10 4 2
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 25th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, July 11th, 2014
While you live, Drink! — for once dead, you never shall return.
Edward FitzGerald
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 5
♥ A K 10 2
♦ 7 3
♣ A K J 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
♠ K J 9 8 6 4 3
♥ 7 3
♦ J 6 5
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 2
♥ Q 9 6
♦ 10 9 8 4
♣ 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♦K
There is a real temptation to raise to three hearts, but if you play New Minor Forcing (where a bid of two clubs is forcing and the way you start describing most invitational or game-forcing hands), then this sequence is weak and denies invitational values with both majors. North should have less than invitational values, and you should therefore pass and hope to go plus.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Sometimes second hand high by the defense will start a completely wrong train of thought for declarer. On this deal, my regular teammate, Hugh Ross, was caught out by the ingenious defense of Vino Bisht of the Netherlands.
The defense to three no-trump started with a diamond to the ace and a low club from dummy, on which Bisht imaginatively rose with the queen! He could see that unless his partner had both the club king and jack, three no-trump was virtually bound to make. He shifted to the diamond 10, and Ross decided to duck this trick. That play would have been correct if he kept West off play and neutralized the diamonds, and the play thus far had persuaded Ross that East had either the club king or jack. By contrast, covering the diamond 10 might have let West duck the trick; now when East got on lead in clubs, another diamond through would spell curtains for the contract.
However Bisht could now clear the diamonds, and Ross took the fourth round of the suit, then played a club to the ace and another club. He assumed that East, the nondanger hand, would take this trick; instead van Oppen won and cashed the fifth diamond for one down.
In the other room, Hans Kreyns won the diamond ace and led a club to the eight and jack. He ducked the diamond return, won the fourth round of the suit, then ducked a club to East and had nine tricks.