October 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The miserable have no other medicine But only hope.
William Shakespeare
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 10 5 4
♥ K J 8 6
♦ A 9 5
♣ 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J
♥ Q 4 3 2
♦ Q J 8 2
♣ K J 6 4 |
♠ K 6 3
♥ A 10 9 7 5
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 7 2
♥ —
♦ K 10 7 3
♣ Q 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2 NT* |
4♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
*Fit for hearts
♥2
Partner has slam interest and it is not up to you to disbelieve him. You should simply cue-bid four diamonds and leave it up to your partner to take it from there. There is an argument for using a call of three spades as a help-suit bid rather than a cue-bid, but either way your hand is suitable for slam purposes.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 5 4
♥ K J 8 6
♦ A 9 5
♣ 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Give us the tools, and we will finish the job.
Winston Churchill
| East |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 6 5 4
♥ 5 4
♦ 9 7 5
♣ 10 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 3 2
♥ 9
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ K 8 6 4 |
♠ J 10 9 8 7
♥ J 10
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ J 5 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A K Q 8 7 6 3 2
♦ K 8
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| 4♥ |
4♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠K
Your partner obviously has decent values and relatively short hearts, but didn't come into the auction. There is therefore an inference that he may have decent diamonds, so I would lead a diamond. If nothing else, this is the lead least likely to blow a trick in the suit led.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 6 2
♥ Q 9 5 3
♦ 9 8
♣ Q 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♥ |
All pass |
|
October 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 21st, 2014
|
How should one play a redouble of a negative double by overcaller's partner? I have heard mention of using it as a way to show trump support — is that sensible?
Maid Marion, Indianapolis, Ind.
To my mind the redouble should show opening values by an unpassed hand, and a maximum pass with secondary support by a passed hand. Keeping the sequence to promise a top trump honor is useful on very rare occasions, but gives up an otherwise useful bid for a sequence that seems to come up only rarely — and where the distinction about the honor may not be important.
My partner and I would appreciate your thoughts on the right bidding to reach the easy slam. She opened one heart and I held a 3-3-5-2 pattern with the heart K-J, both top diamonds and the doubleton club K-Q. I responded two diamonds, bid three hearts over three clubs, and heard my partner re-raise to four hearts to suggest a minimum. What now? Should I gamble on Blackwood?
Nancy Drew, Naples, Fla.
With no spade control, Blackwood is unjustified. I think a five-heart bid asks partner to bid on with a spade control (the only unbid suit) rather than asking about trump. A five-club cue-bid might also make sense.
Say an opponent revokes on a side-suit trick that you took on your way to making six spades. When the partner of the revoker takes the last trick with the trump ace, is there a penalty trick that is due to you? As the director, I ruled that there should not be a penalty trick taken with the trump ace after a revoke, since no harm was done. Was I correct?
Forgiving Director, Framingham, Mass.
Your ruling is understandable — but wrong. The revoke law is not about equity but is a fixed penalty almost totally unlinked to what would have happened without the revoke. The exception is that if the revoke ends up benefiting the offenders, the director can adjust the score. Assuming the defenders took a trick on or after the revoke, the penalty is one trick. It may even be a two-trick penalty if the revoker personally won the revoke trick, and his side took two tricks after the revoke.
|
I found myself unsure as to what to do in a pairs game recently. I heard one spade to my left and a pre-emptive three-club call from my partner. The next hand made a negative double, and at favorable vulnerability I held ♠ Q-3-2, ♥ 9-6-5, ♦ A-Q-9-8- ♣ Q-4-2. Should I pass, raise, or sacrifice? For the record, my partner is a sound bidder, but on this occasion he had the doubleton diamond king and we had four tricks against four hearts — on a diamond lead.
Found Out, Newport News, Va.
Your last sentence fortuitously suggests to me what I might have recommended you do here. After a pre-empt I play that a bid of three diamonds by you would be lead-directing with a club fit. I play you can't rescue a pre-empter until a double has been passed for penalty.
I was in second seat and opened with ♠ K-10-4-3-2, ♥ A-9-6-5, ♦ A-9, ♣ 4-2. We reached two no-trump, which was something of a lucky make. My partner wondered if this hand was really worth an opening bid when vulnerable — so we decided to ask the experts.
Princess Pushy, Kansas City, Mo.
You should only open this hand on days finishing in a Y. With good controls in the form of aces and kings, plus an easy rebid, this one stands out as an opening bid. I'd never risk passing and being frozen out of one suit or both. Eleven-counts should not be routinely opened, but 5-4 hands with good controls and easy rebids offer much more promise than balanced aceless 12-counts.
|
October 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The worst part of success is trying to find someone who is happy for you.
Bette Midler
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 3 2
♥ 7 3 2
♦ K 10 8 3
♣ 9 8 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ Q J 10 8 4
♦ A Q J 5 2
♣ Q 10 |
♠ J 9 6 5
♥ 9 5
♦ 9 7 4
♣ J 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 7 4
♥ A K 6
♦ 6
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Your partner set up a game-force with his two-spade call. Since you have decent club support in context and spade shortage, I think you have just enough for a call of four spades, but a simple raise to five clubs could not be faulted either. Make one of your red queens a king, and I would definitely cue-bid four spades here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ Q J 10 8 4
♦ A Q J 5 2
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.
B. F. Skinner
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q J 9
♥ A 9 3 2
♦ A 10 9 5
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 7 6 5
♥ 4
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ A 5 4 |
♠ 8 2
♥ Q 8 5
♦ 4
♣ J 10 9 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 4 3
♥ K J 10 7 6
♦ K 6 3 2
♣ K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣A
While you have some extras, it feels wrong to introduce a major here. The main reason for doing that might be to escape a penalty double — but partner can always rescue himself if necessary, and you might guess badly if you bid a major now. You may get a second chance to come in, should the opponents bid clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 9
♥ A 9 3 2
♦ A 10 9 5
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
An injury is much sooner forgotten than an insult.
Lord Chesterfield
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 9 6 4 3
♥ 6 2
♦ J 10 2
♣ A Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 5 2
♥ 3
♦ Q 5 3
♣ J 10 8 7 2 |
♠ —
♥ A Q J 10 9 7 4
♦ 9 8 4
♣ K 6 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q J
♥ K 8 5
♦ A K 7 6
♣ 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
3♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥3
My simple rule for determining whether to open a 10- or 11-count with a weak-two bid or a one-level call is to add up my high cards, then an additional two points for a six-card suit and one more point for each four-carder. If the total comes to 13, I suggest you open at the one-level, UNLESS you do not have one and a half quick tricks. This hand qualifies as a one-level opener on all counts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 6 4 3
♥ 6 2
♦ J 10 2
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
One cannot be always laughing at a man without now and then stumbling on something witty.
Jane Austen
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ A 9
♣ K J 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 3
♥ K J 8 3
♦ 7 5
♣ 9 5 |
♠ 7 4
♥ 10 9
♦ J 10 6 3
♣ 10 8 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ A Q 6
♦ K Q 8 4 2
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♠J
In competition, after the takeout double, the re-raise by partner does not show invitational values; it is purely competitive, suggesting four trumps and a little extra in either shape or high-cards. So you are not close to bidding on here. Had West not competed to one spade, a free raise would show real extras and make you worth a try for game by bidding three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 2
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ A 9
♣ K J 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Order and simplification are the first steps toward the mastery of a subject — the actual enemy is the unknown.
Thomas Mann
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 9 3
♥ A J 8 7 3
♦ A
♣ A K Q |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ 2
♦ K 10 8 7 6 4 3
♣ 8 5 |
♠ 4
♥ K Q 10 9 6 5
♦ J 9
♣ J 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 8 5
♥ 4
♦ Q 5 2
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
7♠ |
All pass |
♥2
The choice here is between a redouble — which tends to suggest an unbalanced hand with extras — or a simple call of one spade to show a reverse.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 3
♥ A J 8 7 3
♦ A
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 29th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Fortune is full of fresh variety: Constant in nothing but inconstancy.
Richard Barnfield
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ A J 8
♦ K Q 8 6
♣ 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7 4
♥ Q 9 7 3
♦ 10 9
♣ K 4 2 |
♠ Q J 10 9 5
♥ 10 5
♦ 5 4
♣ J 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ K 6 4 2
♦ A J 7 3 2
♣ A Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♦* |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 6♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Inverted raise
♦10
You could argue that leading from the four-card suit is less likely to cost a trick than anything else, but I strongly believe that the heart lead is more likely to set the game. The point is that just finding partner with four spades may not be enough, while finding partner with a heart suit might be sufficient. The weaker your hand, the more likely it is that you need to hit partner's suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 5 2
♥ Q 3 2
♦ 10 5 2
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
September 28th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I was recently faced with a problem when I had a flat two-count with just the queen of diamonds, and my partner opened two clubs. My RHO overcalled two spades, a suit in which I had just three small cards. Should I pass, double, or try something else? And if I pass, what should I do over a double from my partner?
Jungle George, Tupelo, Miss.
Many play that responder's double here would be weak, with any hand in the 0-4 range, say. Pass would show some values but nothing to say, while new suits are natural though not necessarily full positive values. If opener doubles, the world is divided into those who play it as takeout, and those who believe it should be penalties — either the suit, or strong balanced with a moderate holding in the key suit. Put my vote in the takeout camp.
I was delighted to read in a recent letter that you plan to write more for the broader audience of us who are social bridge players and bridge students and are open to suggestions. That is very encouraging. So would you please explain how to transfer into a minor over one no-trump.
House of Windsor, Fremont, Calif.
A simple scheme (not necessarily best, but simplest) is to use two spades to show clubs and three clubs to show diamonds, with two no-trump remaining natural. After a transfer into a minor, new suits should be shortage, not length. With a minor and a four-card major, plus the values to go to game, start with Stayman. Then bid the minor, if partner does not come through with a fit for you.
How should I decide whether to play in a 5-3 fit or in no-trump? My partner and I had the Jacoby Transfer sequence: 1 NT – 2 ♦ – 2 ♥ – 2 NT, and I had to decide what to do next. I held ♠ A-J-5, ♥ Q-6-4, ♦ A-J-10-3-2, ♣ K-10. I elected to pass, thinking I had a minimum, and that turned out to be the wrong thing to do!
Linked In, Raleigh, N.C.
|
You may have only a minimum in high cards, but your quick tricks and excellent five-card suit suggest you are closer to jumping to four hearts, than signing off in three. I would always play in a 5-3 fit unless my trumps were uninspiring, and I had a real source of tricks in a side-suit. (In the given hand, switch the heart queen and diamond three, for example.)
I held ♠ A-K-9-8, ♥ A-Q-6-2, ♦ K-Q-9-7-3, ♣ —. I opened one diamond and my partner responded one spade. Now what should I have done? At the table I felt I was too strong to splinter, and my high cards seemed prime. So I reversed to two hearts, planning to support spades next, probably with a jump. Subsequently I read about the difference between a jump to three hearts and a jump to four — but I'm not sure what is standard practice here.
Feeling Jumpy, Elmira. N.Y.
With two hearts natural and forcing, jumps in hearts would both show shortage — perhaps the former a singleton, the latter a void. But where the shortage is clubs, a jump to three clubs would be natural, so a call of four clubs is either a singleton or void. With your actual hand I would be a little worried about just bidding four clubs and giving up over a sign-off in four spades. But on balance that must be right.
When partner opens with one club, which could be short, and an opponent bids one diamond, am I required to bid with no high-card points but with a five-card suit?
Shorty, Danville, Ind.
A possibly short club is rarely, if ever, played as forcing. So with zero points you can always pass. There are quite a few hands in the range of 3-5 high-card points where I would respond to one club to try to improve the contract despite my overall weakness, but where I won't bid if the opponents overcall.
|
|
At the Senior World Championships in Bali last September, the Scots qualified for the knockout stages in their first-ever world championship appearance. But they came off second best in this deal against Belgium, where Guy Polet was up to the challenge in four spades doubled.
The opening lead was a heart to the jack and ace, ruffed by declarer. Polet next led a diamond to the ace and a club to the queen and king. West then played the queen of diamonds around to South’s king. South now advanced a low club from hand, and West, after some thought, played low, letting East in. He returned the heart 10 to the king in dummy, declarer discarding a club. Declarer had lost two clubs so far, and knew he had one more loser in diamonds. He was faced with the need to pick up spades for no losers.
At this point, declarer had to choose between finding the singleton king of spades with East or the singleton jack with West. Given East’s double of four spades, it was not really a guess at all. Polet led the spade queen from the dummy, and when the jack fell, he was home. He could repeat the finesse against the spade king, draw the last trump, then give up a diamond. The diamond 10 was the game-going trick.
Exciting stuff — particularly when you learn that in the other room the hand was passed out! Just for the record, Scotland won the match anyway, despite the loss here.