Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 20th, 2014

I know that if I open the bidding and jump to two no-trump over a one-level suit response, it shows 18-19 points or maybe a good 17. Does that also apply after partner responds one no-trump (whether the call is forcing or nonforcing)? I thought that this could be slightly less — maybe 16-17.

Finagler, Newark, N.J.

The values for the two-no-trump call remain the same, no matter what the response — though it depends slightly on your range for the one-no-trump response. Some play the response of one no-trump to one club as 8-10 (not a very popular style anymore) when the raise to two no-trump could be a little lighter.

Could you give me an unbiased summary of what discarding method you would recommend for a beginner to duplicate? Ease of recall should be a factor!

Help Wanted, Nashville, Tenn.

Standard signals, where you throw high cards in the suit you like, are easy to abuse — because one tends to let go cards one cannot afford, often to tell partner something he knows already. The same applies to a lesser degree to reverse signals. There are three equivalent methods I do not have space to discuss in detail: Lavinthal (or suit-preference), revolving discards, and odd-even discards. Each uses a discard in one suit to indicate which of the other suits you prefer. I think odd-even is slightly the most flexible. Check out the Cornhusker Bridge website for more information.

I know about negative doubles by responder at his first turn, but would you clarify what a double by responder on the second round should mean after his LHO comes into the auction. For example, after the auction 1  — Pass — 1 ♠ — (2 ♣) — Pass — Pass, is my hand suitable for a double, holding: ♠ A-Q-6-4,  K-6-5,  Q-9-5-4, ♣ J-3? Or should I simply raise diamonds?

In a Rut, Casper, Wyo.

Here an invitational jump to three diamonds would not be absurd (you may have 12 points, but your hand does not suggest game will be easy your way). If you double, that is for takeout — typically not very short in clubs, though. If you double and subsequently raise diamonds, it would suggest a good hand, though maybe only three-card support.

I have decided to teach an intermediate class on basic bidding. I want them to understand the general rules on what auctions are forcing and what are nonforcing. Just for the record, most of these students don't play 2/1. In current bidding rules, is it true that a new suit by opener is forcing for one round if responder has introduced a new suit at the two-level — and does that also apply by a passed hand?

Faust, Eau Claire, Wis.

Your first statement is true, but there may not be clear agreement in the second instance. The answer is yes, but it is more about partnership agreement than anything else. The logic is that opener is unlimited, and should not have to jump to create a force. I agree that the two-level response by a passed hand shows values, but does not guarantee a second call after opener has shown a minimum hand.

How would you rate the possible courses of action on this unopposed sequence: 1 ♣ – 1  – 1 ♠ – 3 ♣? As dealer I had: ♠ A-Q-10-5,  8-5,  9, ♣ A-Q-10-8-3-2 and passed because I held a minimum in high cards, but my partner suggested I should have reraised to four clubs with my extra shape.

Timid Tim, Lincoln, N.H.

Your hand is worth driving all the way to five clubs. With your extra shape and prime honors in your long suits, there are probably more hands where game is laydown or on a finesse, than where it is not. For example, give partner as little as a black king plus an ace, with a doubleton spade. Respect your extra club length and fine honor structure — this would be a far worse hand with queen-fourth of spades and the bare diamond ace.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, July 19th, 2014

Diplomacy means the art of nearly deceiving all your friends, but not quite deceiving all your enemies.

Kofi Busia


West North
Both ♠ J 6
 A K 5 3
 A
♣ A 10 9 7 6 4
West East
♠ 10 3
 J 7 4
 K 9 4 3 2
♣ K J 5
♠ K 9 8 2
 10 9 8 2
 10 8 7
♣ Q 2
South
♠ A Q 7 5 4
 Q 6
 Q J 6 5
♣ 8 3
South West North East
Pass 1♣* Pass
1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 Pass
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

*Strong

3

Sometimes second hand high by the defense will start a completely wrong train of thought for declarer. On this deal, my regular teammate, Hugh Ross, was caught out by the ingenious defense of Vino Bisht of the Netherlands.

The defense to three no-trump started with a diamond to the ace and a low club from dummy, on which Bisht imaginatively rose with the queen! He could see that unless his partner had both the club king and jack, three no-trump was virtually bound to make. He shifted to the diamond 10, and Ross decided to duck this trick. That play would have been correct if he kept West off play and neutralized the diamonds, and the play thus far had persuaded Ross that East had either the club king or jack. By contrast, covering the diamond 10 might have let West duck the trick; now when East got on lead in clubs, another diamond through would spell curtains for the contract.

However Bisht could now clear the diamonds, and Ross took the fourth round of the suit, then played a club to the ace and another club. He assumed that East, the nondanger hand, would take this trick; instead van Oppen won and cashed the fifth diamond for one down.

In the other room, Hans Kreyns won the diamond ace and led a club to the eight and jack. He ducked the diamond return, won the fourth round of the suit, then ducked a club to East and had nine tricks.


This would be a harder problem if your partner were not a passed hand, As it is, you should play the double as takeout and bid two diamonds. Personally, I play that even by a passed hand this is a rare double of one no-trump for takeout, not penalty. Even if partner is strong, either opener or responder will be running to safety — or you won't have your bid. Either way, a penalty double won't get you rich.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q 7 5 4
 Q 6
 Q J 6 5
♣ 8 3
South West North East
Pass 1♣
1♠ 1 NT Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, July 18th, 2014

Those whose conduct gives room for talk are always the first to attack their neighbors.

Moliere


North North
Neither ♠ Q
 A K 10
 Q J 9 5 3 2
♣ A 10 7
West East
♠ 5 2
 7 5 3 2
 K 7
♣ J 9 5 3 2
♠ K J 10 7 6 4
 8 6 4
 A 8
♣ Q 4
South
♠ A 9 8 3
 Q J 9
 10 6 4
♣ K 8 6
South West North East
1 1♠
1 NT Pass 3 Pass
3 NT All pass    

♠5

In today's deal both tables played three no-trump, but at one table it was North who was declarer; in the other room it was South.

Where North was declarer, the lead was the spade jack, and declarer won in hand with the queen, and still had two spade guards left, while needing to knock out the ace and king of diamonds. So he had no trouble coming to 10 tricks.

In the other room West led the spade five in the auction shown. Declarer captured East’s king with his ace, and West won the first diamond and pressed on with spades. Now the defenders could set up their spades while retaining the diamond ace as an entry to the suit, beating the game by two tricks. How many mistakes were made here?

The last mistake was declarer’s. If he ducks the spade king, the defenders cannot both set up and cash out the spades, since when West wins the diamond king he will have no spades left. And there is no shift that will help the defenders at trick two.

However, East was also at fault. The opening lead made it clear that declarer held two spade stoppers. With just one side-entry, East should compel South to use one of those stoppers at once, by declining to cover dummy’s singleton spade queen.

Now when West gets in with the diamond king, he can establish the spade suit before East’s diamond ace is removed.


The point here needs to be made occasionally, if only to reinforce it to everyone: Bidding a major over a one-diamond overcall promises a minimum of just four cards. But if the opponents overcall one heart, you double with four spades and bid the suit with five. So bid one spade here, rather than make a negative double, which would guarantee both majors, typically with four cards in each.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 9 8 3
 Q J 9
 10 6 4
♣ K 8 6
South West North East
1♣ 1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, July 17th, 2014

The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.

Edward Phelps


South North
Neither ♠ A 8 3 2
 J 8 7 3
 10 8 6 4
♣ K
West East
♠ 5 4
 9
 9 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 4
♠ Q J 10
 Q 5 4 2
 K J
♣ A J 5 3
South
♠ K 9 7 6
 A K 10 6
 A Q
♣ 9 7 2
South West North East
1 NT Pass 2♣ Pass
2 Pass 4 All pass

♣4

The Italians currently have the world's best team, but bridge is a game of mistakes and they make theirs, just like everyone else, even if not quite so many as other people. See if you can improve on the Italian cardplay on this deal.

Against South’s four hearts, reached after an uninterrupted auction, West led the club four, playing third and lowest leads, to the king and ace, and East switched to the spade queen. The Italian declarer won in hand, ruffed a club, played a heart to his ace, and ruffed his last club with the heart jack. Now he played a diamond to the king and ace, followed by a spade to his ace and another spade, won by East’s jack. East got off lead with the diamond jack, and when declarer played the heart king, he found the bad break, which meant he had to lose two more trump tricks one way or another.

The winning line is to play a spade in the four-card ending. East ruffs this and either plays a trump — allowing the finesse — or a club, which declarer can ruff low in hand and overruff in the dummy, to lead a diamond for the trump coup.

There were good reasons to suspect trumps were going to break 4-1. The 5-2 diamond break looked highly probable, and East was known to have precisely three spades. Moreover, West’s lead of the club four (once East had released the club three) meant he strongly rated to have led from a five-card suit.


On this auction there is a very good case to play three clubs as your second negative and not two no-trump. The logic is that, with three no-trump a very likely final contract, you want the strong hand to be declarer — so the lead runs up to it, rather than coming through it. Therefore, I would bid three clubs here to deny values.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 5 4
 9
 9 7 5 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 4
South West North East
2♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, July 16th, 2014

Pride is a tricky, glorious, double-edged feeling.

Adrienne Rich


East North
North-South ♠ 8 6
 A Q 6 5 2
 K Q 2
♣ A Q 9
West East
♠ 10 2
 K J 7 4
 J 8 7 5
♣ K 10 2
♠ K Q J 4 3
 10 3
 10 9 6 4
♣ J 6
South
♠ A 9 7 5
 9 8
 A 3
♣ 8 7 5 4 3
South West North East
2♠
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
3♣ Pass 3♠ Pass
3 NT All pass    

♠10

This hand was reported as a missed opportunity rather than as a play actually found, suggesting it was too difficult to find at the table, though these things are often easier on paper than in real life. When this hand occurred in the Blue Ribbon pairs a few years ago, East's weak two-spade bid provoked his opponents into overbidding to game.

In the typical auction shown here, South’s three-club bid showed values (without them he would have bid two no-trump), and NorthSouth then drove to three no-trump. South ducked the lead of the spade 10 and won the next spade. His natural play was to finesse the club queen, lay down the ace, and play a third round of clubs, achieving his aim of setting up the clubs without letting East get the lead.

However, at the end of trick two, West could perhaps have foreseen the location of all the high cards. What would have happened if West had contributed the club 10 on the first round of the suit?

Declarer knows that he is safe if this is a true card from the K-J-10; but what if West has K-10 doubleton — in that case, playing clubs from the top would let East win the third round of clubs and cash his spades. Therefore, South may well decide to duck the second club, to keep East off lead. Of course, if South makes this play, East wins the club jack, and can cash out for one down.


It is surely right to bid here; the question is what to bid. A call of two diamonds, planning to back in with two spades over two hearts, is quite reasonable, but it does leave the opponents more room than a direct call of two spades. For that reason, and fr its lead-directing value, I prefer to bid the major.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q J 4 3
 10 3
 10 9 6 4
♣ J 6
South West North East
1 1 NT
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, July 15th, 2014

Great men, great nations, have not been boasters and buffoons, but perceivers of the terror of life, and have manned themselves to face it.

Ralph Waldo Emerson


East North
North-South ♠ Q 5
 A 7 5 4 3 2
 K 10 6 5
♣ 9
West East
♠ J 10 8 7 3 2
 —
 Q 9 2
♣ K Q J 7
♠ 9 6
 K Q 10
 A J 8 7 3
♣ 10 8 3
South
♠ A K 4
 J 9 8 6
 4
♣ A 6 5 4 2
South West North East
Pass
1♣ 1♠ Dbl. 1 NT
2 2♠ 3 Pass
4 Pass Pass Dbl.
All pass      

♣K

It is often hard to know when to make a penalty double. When East decided to pounce in today's deal, he found that the opponents' contract was cold, but he got lucky when declarer missed the point.

Perhaps you would like to cover up the East and West cards and plan the play in four hearts doubled before reading on.

Declarer took the lead of the club king and at trick two played a heart to his ace. He then played the spade queen and a spade to his king before leading a diamond to the 10 and jack. East cashed his two trump winners before getting off play with a club, and declarer had to give the defenders another trick at the end.

Declarer had missed the underlying theme, since he should have tried to set up the dummy by ruffing two diamonds in hand (one could be discarded on a spade). It didn’t matter if he lost two trump tricks, so long as he lost only one diamond trick.

At trick, two declarer should have played a diamond. Suppose East wins and returns a spade. Declarer wins in dummy and ruffs a diamond. Now a trump to the ace discloses the 3-0 break, but declarer is under no pressure. He ruffs a diamond to hand and a club to dummy, then ruffs the fourth diamond and simply concedes two trumps at the end.

Once West is known to have three or more diamonds, the club ruff in dummy is safe.


I'm aware that I'm eligible for my AARP card. I hope I'm not betraying my age when I say I consider my hearts a less appropriate suit for a weak-two bid than most, and I would be concerned at opening this suit in second seat at any vulnerability. Even in first seat, I'd prefer to have the 10-9 in my suit before I open it. In third seat, nonvulnerable, anything goes.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 5
 A 7 5 4 3 2
 K 10 6 5
♣ 9
South West North East
Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, July 14th, 2014

The combat deepens. On ye brave,
Who rush to glory or the grave.

Thomas Campbell


South North
Both ♠ 10 9 6
 A K 9 5 3
 J 10
♣ A 8 4
West East
♠ J 4
 8 6
 K Q 9 8 3
♣ K 6 5 2
♠ Q 3 2
 Q J 10 2
 7 5 4
♣ J 10 9
South
♠ A K 8 7 5
 7 4
 A 6 2
♣ Q 7 3
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2 Pass
2 NT Pass 4♠ All pass

K

In today's deal, declarer neglected to focus on the possible problem he might have with communications, and so gave up his best chance of making his contract.

West led the diamond king against four spades, which declarer allowed to hold. There was a likely trump loser plus a club loser or two, depending on the position of the club king. South saw that on a 3-3 heart break he could rid himself of both his club losers and end up with 11 tricks.

So he won the diamond queen continuation, cashed the top spades, ruffed his losing diamond with dummy’s last trump, then played ace, king and another heart, which he ruffed. When West discarded, South was philosophical — he still had the club play in reserve. But a club to the ace, then a club to the queen, saw West win with the king, and the club return spelled the demise of the game.

South failed to take his main chance in the right order — he should have tried to succeed against either a 3-3 or a 4-2 heart break. To cope with the 4-2 heart break, South needed two entries to dummy, but he had squandered an entry by ruffing his third diamond prematurely.

After playing his top trumps, declarer should next have taken the heart ace and king, then followed with a heart ruff in hand. Only now should he ruff the diamond. Another heart ruff would establish the fifth heart, and the club ace remains in dummy as the entry to it.


Had your partner not doubled the final contract, you would dutifully have led a spade. So does your partner's double simply try to increase the penalty he expects to get? I think not. The double should indicate he has another very good suit and wants you to try to find it. The odds favor that suit to be clubs, so I would lead the club nine, and have my excuses ready if partner has K-Q-9-fifth of diamonds.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 5 2
 Q 9 8 3 2
 J 10 6 4
♣ 9 5
South West North East
1 1♠ 1 NT
Pass 3 NT Dbl. All pass

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 13th, 2014

What value should I put on 10s when determining whether to invite or drive to game in no-trump after my partner has opened one no-trump?

Combination Lock, Jackson, Tenn.

The Milton Work count (A=4, K=3, Q=2, J=1) is universally the most popular method, and is pretty good at providing a guide for balanced hands. But it gives no value to 10s, which are often valuable in no-trump contracts when allied with higher honors. When you respond to one no-trump, the presence of a 10 with one top honor in a five-card suit is worth at least half a point. When it comes to a close decision, the presence of a couple of 10s, and indeed 9s, might sway you toward optimism.

Recently I picked up ♠ 9-6-5-4-3,  A-J-7-5,  9-5, ♣ Q-J, and heard my partner open one no-trump. I used Stayman and passed the response of two hearts. Nine tricks were the limit on the hand, but my partner felt I had undercooked it. Was he right?

Culinary Institute, Texarkana, Texas

I agree with your partner. My plan after Stayman would be to bid two no-trump over a two-diamond response, to raise two hearts to three hearts, and to raise a two-spade response to game! So you would have done better than I on this hand.

I have recently learned the forcing no-trump in response to an opening bid of one of a major. My partner wants to play it in response to an opening in third and fourth seats too. Would you recommend this treatment?

The Force Be With You, Anchorage, Alaska

I would not recommend going that way. The forcing no-trump allows you to show strong balanced invitations in no-trump or partner's major, which are impossible hand-types for a passed hand. With trump support you bid two clubs (Drury); with a balanced hand you bid one no-trump, then two no-trump (if you get another turn). The upside of playing one no-trump nonforcing is to be able to stop there with two balanced hands facing each another.

I opened one club with ♠ Q-10-3,  J-5-2,  A-9, ♣ A-J-4-3-2. My LHO made a one-heart overcall, and now my partner produced a negative double. How would you compare the merits of rebidding clubs, introducing spades, and rebidding one no-trump?

Weight and See, Santa Fe, N.M.

A one-no-trump rebid would suggest 12-14, without guaranteeing a great heart stop. You'd prefer to have more in hearts, but beggars cannot be choosers. This is especially so since a two-club call strongly suggests a six-card suit, while bidding a three-card spade suit — except in dire emergency — is not an action I would advocate. Make the heart jack the diamond jack, and you might do so.

I was in second seat at matchpoint pairs with ♠ K-J-3,  A-Q-7-4,  7-6-4, ♣ A-Q-10. What is the correct bid with this hand after a one-diamond opening to your right? Could you comment on the merits of pass, double, or an overcall of one heart or even one no-trump?

Thin White Duke, Newark, Calif.

You must act, but normally overcalling one no-trump without a stopper is a bad idea. Still, I prefer that action to overcalling one heart with low offense, but defensive tricks galore. I would double and not worry about the flat shape — partner can provide that, on a good or even an average day.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, July 12th, 2014

I began to suspect that the ultimate sacrifice isn't death after all; the ultimate sacrifice is willingly bearing the fullest penalty for your own actions.

Orson Scott Card


East North
East-West ♠ 4
 K 6 4
 K 7 6 3
♣ J 10 9 5 4
West East
♠ Q 9 8 5
 J 10 9 5 2
 8
♣ A 7 3
♠ K J 7
 A Q 8 3
 J 9 5
♣ K 8 2
South
♠ A 10 6 3 2
 7
 A Q 10 4 2
♣ Q 6
South West North East
1*
2 4 4 NT Dbl.
5 Dbl. All pass  

* Playing four-card majors

J

Berry Westra and Enri Leufkens of the Netherlands were the first and so far are the only pair to have won both a World Junior Championship and a Bermuda Bowl in partnership. They combined well on this hand from the World Championships in Beijing 20 years ago against Venezuela.

The sacrifice in five diamonds looks sensible, as it would not have been at all easy for South to lead the spade ace at trick one against four hearts, and take the spade ruffs needed to defeat the game.

However, the sacrifice turned out to be far more expensive than it might have appeared. Westra led the heart jack against five diamonds doubled, and when it was ducked all around, he switched to a trump. Now declarer made the slightly careless play of drawing three rounds of trump at once, ending in dummy; however, against most people he would not have been punished. It looks simple for declarer now to give up two clubs, but when Muzzia led a club to his queen, Westra found the fine play of ducking.

Westra hopped up with the ace on the next club play and led a second heart. Now there were no longer enough entries to dummy to establish the club suit. With the spade suit similarly dead, declarer finished three down, for minus 500.

Had declarer simply played the club queen at trick three, then the duck would have been countereffective and the defenders would have had to settle for down one.


I can see a reasonable case for passing, retreating to three diamonds, or bidding game. It feels like landing on a pinhead to pass, so one should either opt for safety or go for the big prize. My choice would be to bid three no-trump because of that diamond 10 and the aces, which argue that partner might come to nine tricks even when we only have a single guard in one of the side-suits.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 10 6 3 2
 7
 A Q 10 4 2
♣ Q 6
South West North East
1♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
2 Pass 2 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, July 11th, 2014

While you live,
Drink! — for once dead, you never shall return.

Edward FitzGerald


East North
East-West ♠ A 5
 A K 10 2
 7 3
♣ A K J 9 4
West East
♠ Q 7
 J 8 5 4
 A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5
♠ K J 9 8 6 4 3
 7 3
 J 6 5
♣ 3
South
♠ 10 2
 Q 9 6
 10 9 8 4
♣ 8 7 6 2
South West North East
3♠
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
4♣ Pass 5♣ All pass

K

Earlier this year eight pairs participated in the Belgian open team trials for the European Championships in Opatija, Croatia, that concluded last week. The trials were played over 14 sessions, where each session consisted of three matches against every other table. The top three pairs would qualify. With one day (two sessions) remaining, everything seemed decided as Philippe Coenraets and Steven De Donder, in third place, had a 43 VIP margin over fourth place. Patrick Bocken and Olivier Neve, however, did manage to come back in a direct encounter with Steven and Philippe. Neve, sitting South, brought home this five-club contract elegantly.

After the lead of the diamond king and ace (East showing an odd number), West switched to the spade queen. Neve took the ace and realized that East rated to have seven spades and three diamonds, and thus would be short in either hearts or clubs. Since North-South had nine clubs and seven hearts between them, it was far more likely that East’s shortage was in clubs.

So South cashed just one top club, played the heart ace and queen, then finessed the heart 10 as East helplessly discarded. Now he could take the heart king to discard a spade, ruff a spade back to hand, and finally could take the marked trump finesse for an impressive plus 600.

Note that if declarer uses his heart entry to take the early finesse in trumps, he can never get back to hand to take the heart finesse.


There is a real temptation to raise to three hearts, but if you play New Minor Forcing (where a bid of two clubs is forcing and the way you start describing most invitational or game-forcing hands), then this sequence is weak and denies invitational values with both majors. North should have less than invitational values, and you should therefore pass and hope to go plus.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 7
 J 8 5 4
 A K Q 2
♣ Q 10 5
South West North East
1 Pass 1♠ Pass
1 NT Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].