September 7th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
My partner and I had an uncontested auction: 1 ♦ – 1 ♥ – 1 ♠ – 4 ♠. Now, holding ♠ A-Q-6-2, ♥ —, ♦ A-K-J-7-5-3, ♣ K-6-3, I expected to find a shapely hand with less than an opening bid, (maybe 4-6 in the majors) and passed. This was not a success as my partner actually had a 4-5-0-4 hand with both the king-jack of spades and the ace-jack of clubs. Did either of us do anything stupid?
In the Lurch, Elmira, N.Y.
On this auction the strong hand can reasonably assume facing a jump to game that there won't be two fast losers. Whether slam is good or not may depend on partner's fillers. If partner has shape but nonsolid hearts, slam may be horrible. Still — any hand with the spade king and two diamonds will offer play for slam, so I must admit I would bid it.
In second seat, after a pass on my right, I had ♠ 7, ♥ K-J-10-6-5, ♦ A-Q-5-3, ♣ K-10-9, and opened one heart. My LHO joined in with one spade, my partner raised to two hearts, and my RHO competed to two spades. It feels right to me to compete further — but is a call of three diamonds or three hearts correct here?
Moving On, Bristol, Va.
Three diamonds should deliver real extras in shape or high-cards since it is a game-try, and thus your partner is allowed to bid four hearts at his next turn. Meanwhile, since you really have only a competitive three-heart call, make that bid. Partner will know not to bid on here in further competition. Make your club nine the queen and you might easily make game opposite a couple of working high cards.
My partner and I have been discussing the idea of playing Mitchell Stayman after our minor-suit openings are overcalled with one no-trump. Do you play anything artificial here, and would you recommend this, or something like it?
Grampus, Richmond, Va.
|
For clarification for my readers: when partner's minor-suit opening bid is overcalled by a bid of one no-trump, a call of two clubs (or possibly two of the other minor) can be used as Stayman rather than a club raise. You lose the ability to play two clubs, but in turn get both majors into the picture. I would rate it as a mildly useful gadget, but it is not an essential tool. It is certainly not a good idea for those inclined to forget their system!
My partner opened one no-trump, and I transferred into hearts with a call of two diamonds, holding ♠ J-3, ♥ Q-10-7-6-5, ♦ 9-5, ♣ A-J-4-3. This was doubled, and my partner passed. What should the pass mean — and what should I do now?
Lucky Luke, Kenosha, Wis.
Without the double, you might have thought about inviting to game with two no-trump. But partner's pass suggests only two hearts, and nothing about diamonds, except that a redouble would have been to play. That being so, you probably want to stay low and bid two hearts. I would use a redouble as a re-transfer here — but I would not recommend that in an untried partnership.
You have recently made the point on several occasions that, in competition, jump raises of partner's opening or overcall should be weaker rather than stronger, in terms of high cards. Can you clarify for me how many points you recommend playing the cue-bid to show?
Meter Maid, Sacramento, Calif.
A cue-bid guarantees the values for at least interest in game, and shows limit-raise values. Some nine-counts clearly qualify; equally, some 10-counts clearly don't. This applies to the cue-bid in response to an opening or an overcall. When in doubt, upvalue side aces and kings and devalue soft honors in the side-suits. Mentally add on for side-suit shortage; deduct for honors in the opponents' suits.
|
September 6th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 23rd, 2014
Hope is a good breakfast, but it is a bad supper.
Francis Bacon
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ J 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 10 9
♦ K Q 5
♣ K J 10 9 3 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 8 7 5 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 4 3 2
♥ J 4 3
♦ A 4 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
3♣ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Despite having your values in the suits other than partner's, you should give preference to three diamonds now, and not repeat no-trump. Notwithstanding your decent club and heart values, you may find your stoppers are unsatisfactory if you have to give up the lead a couple of times. Let partner advance beyond three diamonds with extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣ |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 5th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
We ought to feel deep cheerfulness that a happy Providence kept it from being any worse.
Thomas Hardy
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 9 7
♥ K 2
♦ 9 3
♣ A Q J 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6
♥ 9 5
♦ A Q 10 6 5
♣ 4 3 2 |
♠ 8 5 4
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ J 4
♣ K 10 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A 3 2
♥ Q J 10 7 3
♦ K 8 7 2
♣ 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦6
This hand seems just a little too good for a jump to two spades (which is typically a hand with shape in the 12-14 range). This looks like a jump to three spades, since you want partner to bid game with anything approaching extras in the way of shape or high cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 9 7
♥ K 2
♦ 9 3
♣ A Q J 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 4th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Everyone has talent. What's rare is the courage to follow it to the dark places where it leads.
Erica Jong
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K Q
♥ Q 8 6 5
♦ 8 7 5
♣ K 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4 2
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ 3 2
♣ A 9 |
♠ 10 6 5 3
♥ K 9 4
♦ Q J 10
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ A 3
♦ A K 9 6 4
♣ Q J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠4
Your 10-count would be at the lower cusp of an invitational jump to two hearts, until your RHO devalued your hand still further. Now it sounds as if both your minor-suit holdings are grounds for pessimism. I would bid just one heart now, planning to compete further if the opportunity arose.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q
♥ Q 8 6 5
♦ 8 7 5
♣ K 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Nothing is more dangerous than an idea, when it's the only one we have.
Emile Chartier
| East |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ K J 7 6 5
♦ A 7 3
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ A 10 9 8
♦ Q 6 4
♣ K 10 7 6 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 4
♦ J 10 5 2
♣ A Q 9 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9 6 4
♥ 3 2
♦ K 9 8
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
3♣* |
Dbl. |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Artificial limit raise in spades
♣6
Although you have only a nine-count, your fifth trump and your fit for partner's suit suggest you are just worth a game-try of two spades. This is a help-suit game-try, asking partner to bid game with a maximum or with a suitable spade-holding. Partner should assume you have length but not strength in spades. You are closer to a bid of four hearts than to a pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ K J 7 6 5
♦ A 7 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
My true love hath my heart, and I have his, By just exchange, one for the other given.
Sir Philip Sidney
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J 10 5 3
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ K 10 7 6 2
♦ 10 6
♣ 9 6 3 2 |
♠ K Q 7 2
♥ 5 4 3
♦ K 7 2
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
♠ 9 4
♥ A J
♦ A Q J 9 3
♣ A J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥6
Facing a reverse, we traditionally used to play a rebid of your suit as nonforcing and weak. The modern style is better; it uses a rebid of two spades as forcing for one round, and raises of partner's suit or preference to it as forcing. With a weak hand one agrees to play either two no-trump or fourth suit as artificial, fewer than eight HCP without five cards in your first suit. So a call of two spades here is just fine.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 5 3
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 1st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Tut, tut, child.
Lewis Carroll
| North |
North |
| Neither |
♠ K 10 9
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 6 3 2
♥ 6 5
♦ A 7 5
♣ J 4 3 |
♠ A 8
♥ K 7 2
♦ Q 9 6 4
♣ 10 9 8 2 |
| South |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ A Q J 4
♦ J 8 3
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♣ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠Q
Your red-suit values have not improved on this auction. The choice is to double one heart for penalty and decide what to do when the opponents run, or to bid one no-trump immediately to get your hand type across. I prefer that route; you may be able to balance into two hearts over a minor.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 9
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 31st, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
About midway through play in our rubber game, in four hearts doubled, East trumped a spade in her hand then later on played a spade from her hand. At the end of the hand, East was down two tricks doubled not vulnerable. Do North-South earn two additional tricks from East's one revoke? And how many more points do North/South score for the two revoke tricks, since the bid was doubled?
Number Cruncher, Troy, N.Y.
If the offenders won no further tricks (including the revoke trick) there is no penalty. If they won only one trick, the penalty is one trick. If the revoker won the revoke trick personally (by trumping in error) AND the revoking side won two or more subsequent tricks, there is a two-trick penalty. Those tricks are added to the nonoffenders' total — be they doubled or undoubled tricks. So here there appears to be a two-trick penalty, and you score as for four down doubled. That is 800.
When my partner opened two no-trump recently I was looking at both doubleton minor aces, jack-third of spades and jack-sixth of hearts. I transferred into hearts, then couldn't decide how to continue. Just for the record, my partner's assets included the top three hearts and five semisolid spades plus a stray queen, so we had 13 cashing tricks.
Richie Rich, North Bay, Ontario
Transferring to hearts. then inviting slam with a jump to four no-trump or a quantitative five hearts, sounds about right. With two aces I think you are just worth the second sequence. but getting to the grand slam is VERY hard. Your partner did well not to open one spade, when even getting to small slam might be beyond many.
Sometimes I feel the game is passing me by. In a recent column of yours, the bidding started with opener bidding one diamond and hearing a double to his left. After responder bid one spade, the fourth hand competed to two hearts, and opener doubled. What bidding convention is involved?
Hot Potato, Rolling Hills Estate, Cal.
|
This is a support double (where opener's double at his second turn to speak, of a call below two of partner's major, shows three trump; meanwhile, a direct raise shows four). It is now close to standard expert practice, but it is still not common except in duplicate circles. Would I recommend it? I'm not sure; it's a crutch but a reasonably useful one.
I dealt and opened one diamond with: ♠ A, ♥ K-J-5, ♦ Q-J-8-6-5-4, ♣ A-J-10. When I heard my partner respond one heart, was it right for me to jump in hearts or diamonds – or should I have done something else?
Hopping Mad, Pleasanton, Calif.
This is a very challenging problem. You are not worth a force to game of course, and jumping in diamonds on a suit headed by the queen-jack seems wrong. Equally, though, a raise to three hearts with three trumps would be unusual — though not entirely absurd. Perhaps a temporizing call of two clubs would work, so long as partner does not pass. Maybe even then you might find it was your best spot.
Do you have a strong view on the merits or otherwise of Bergen Raises, by which I mean converting responder’s minor-suit jumps facing a major-suit opening to be four trumps with 6-9 and 10-11 points respectively?
More or Less, Savannah, Ga.
My personal preference is still to keep my jump-shifts as strong. I am happy to lose the distinction between three- and four-card raises initially. I’d like to try to perfect my bidding in other areas, and do not wish to lose the important distinction between really good hands and invitational hands in the minors -– which is what Bergen tends to drive you to do It also tends to substitute system for judgment, I find. like Support Doubles. Finally, just for the record, in competition or by a passed hand they are a very bad idea. Fit-jumps work far better.
|
August 30th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Life is not found in atoms or molecules or genes as such, but in organization; not in symbiosis but in synthesis.
Edwin Grant Conklin
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 8 2
♥ A K Q 10 9 3
♦ A
♣ Q 10 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 4
♥ 8 7 2
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 8 6 3 |
♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ 5 4
♦ K 10 7 6 5
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ J 6
♦ Q 9 4 2
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥8
Your partner's double is takeout, not penalties. (After doubling for takeout, you cannot convert the meaning of a second double to takeout; it simply shows extra values.) In the context of your pass over one spade, you could hardly be better for diamonds than you actually are. While a call of two diamonds could not be faulted, this feels like a hand worth three diamonds now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ 5 4
♦ K 10 7 6 5
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1♠ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 29th, 2014 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The day breaks not; it is my heart.
John Donne
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A 4 2
♣ A 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 3
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ J 5
♣ Q 7 4 |
♠ 9 8
♥ K Q
♦ Q 8 7 6 3
♣ J 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 6 5
♥ A 5 3
♦ K 10 9
♣ K 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
It is important when deciding whether to act with a marginal hand over a pre-empt to make your decision quickly or you may cause your partner ethical problems — as well as giving away information to the opponents. Here your heart length should be the deciding factor in going low. Let your partner balance with heart shortage.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A 4 2
♣ A 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The final of the 1999 world junior championships saw Italy take an early lead against the US and hold on comfortably. Even the best US results got lost in the shuffle — as here, when Eric Greco found one of the best plays of the tournament, simply to hold his losses on the deal.
After the opening lead of the heart 10 against four spades, Greco rose with the king and ran the diamond 10. He won the heart return in dummy, and, after a lot of thought, passed the diamond nine.. The point of this play is that he was trying to set up the diamonds without letting East in. That approach would work well if hearts were 5-2, but very dangerous if hearts broke 4-3, since there might be a trump promotion on the 13th heart.
All was well, since Greco had read the cards correctly, and West had no heart to lead when he took the second diamond. West exited with a club, and declarer ruffed, cashed the top spades, then led the fourth diamond to pitch dummy’s heart loser and make his contract.
Alas for the US, four spades doubled was allowed to make in the Closed Room. The first three tricks started the same way, but declarer then came to hand with a top spade to lead the diamond ace. West forgot to unblock his other top diamond on this trick, so East could not get in to cash the hearts. Now the play reverted back to Greco’s line.