Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 24th, 2014

My partner and I had an uncontested auction: 1 ♦ – 1 ♥ – 1 ♠ – 4 ♠. Now, holding ♠ A-Q-6-2, ♥ —, ♦ A-K-J-7-5-3, ♣ K-6-3, I expected to find a shapely hand with less than an opening bid, (maybe 4-6 in the majors) and passed. This was not a success as my partner actually had a 4-5-0-4 hand with both the king-jack of spades and the ace-jack of clubs. Did either of us do anything stupid?

In the Lurch, Elmira, N.Y.

On this auction the strong hand can reasonably assume facing a jump to game that there won't be two fast losers. Whether slam is good or not may depend on partner's fillers. If partner has shape but nonsolid hearts, slam may be horrible. Still — any hand with the spade king and two diamonds will offer play for slam, so I must admit I would bid it.

In second seat, after a pass on my right, I had ♠ 7, ♥ K-J-10-6-5, ♦ A-Q-5-3, ♣ K-10-9, and opened one heart. My LHO joined in with one spade, my partner raised to two hearts, and my RHO competed to two spades. It feels right to me to compete further — but is a call of three diamonds or three hearts correct here?

Moving On, Bristol, Va.

Three diamonds should deliver real extras in shape or high-cards since it is a game-try, and thus your partner is allowed to bid four hearts at his next turn. Meanwhile, since you really have only a competitive three-heart call, make that bid. Partner will know not to bid on here in further competition. Make your club nine the queen and you might easily make game opposite a couple of working high cards.

My partner and I have been discussing the idea of playing Mitchell Stayman after our minor-suit openings are overcalled with one no-trump. Do you play anything artificial here, and would you recommend this, or something like it?

Grampus, Richmond, Va.

For clarification for my readers: when partner's minor-suit opening bid is overcalled by a bid of one no-trump, a call of two clubs (or possibly two of the other minor) can be used as Stayman rather than a club raise. You lose the ability to play two clubs, but in turn get both majors into the picture. I would rate it as a mildly useful gadget, but it is not an essential tool. It is certainly not a good idea for those inclined to forget their system!

My partner opened one no-trump, and I transferred into hearts with a call of two diamonds, holding ♠ J-3, ♥ Q-10-7-6-5, ♦ 9-5, ♣ A-J-4-3. This was doubled, and my partner passed. What should the pass mean — and what should I do now?

Lucky Luke, Kenosha, Wis.

Without the double, you might have thought about inviting to game with two no-trump. But partner's pass suggests only two hearts, and nothing about diamonds, except that a redouble would have been to play. That being so, you probably want to stay low and bid two hearts. I would use a redouble as a re-transfer here — but I would not recommend that in an untried partnership.

You have recently made the point on several occasions that, in competition, jump raises of partner's opening or overcall should be weaker rather than stronger, in terms of high cards. Can you clarify for me how many points you recommend playing the cue-bid to show?

Meter Maid, Sacramento, Calif.

A cue-bid guarantees the values for at least interest in game, and shows limit-raise values. Some nine-counts clearly qualify; equally, some 10-counts clearly don't. This applies to the cue-bid in response to an opening or an overcall. When in doubt, upvalue side aces and kings and devalue soft honors in the side-suits. Mentally add on for side-suit shortage; deduct for honors in the opponents' suits.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 23rd, 2014

Hope is a good breakfast, but it is a bad supper.

Francis Bacon


West North
East-West ♠ J 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 7 4 2
West East
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 10 9
♦ K Q 5
♣ K J 10 9 3
♠ 8
♥ Q 8 7 5 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5
South
♠ A K 7 4 3 2
♥ J 4 3
♦ A 4 3 2
♣ —
South West North East
1♣ Pass 1♥
1♠ Pass 2♥ 3♣
4♠ All pass    

♥10

The final of the 1999 world junior championships saw Italy take an early lead against the US and hold on comfortably. Even the best US results got lost in the shuffle — as here, when Eric Greco found one of the best plays of the tournament, simply to hold his losses on the deal.

After the opening lead of the heart 10 against four spades, Greco rose with the king and ran the diamond 10. He won the heart return in dummy, and, after a lot of thought, passed the diamond nine.. The point of this play is that he was trying to set up the diamonds without letting East in. That approach would work well if hearts were 5-2, but very dangerous if hearts broke 4-3, since there might be a trump promotion on the 13th heart.

All was well, since Greco had read the cards correctly, and West had no heart to lead when he took the second diamond. West exited with a club, and declarer ruffed, cashed the top spades, then led the fourth diamond to pitch dummy’s heart loser and make his contract.

Alas for the US, four spades doubled was allowed to make in the Closed Room. The first three tricks started the same way, but declarer then came to hand with a top spade to lead the diamond ace. West forgot to unblock his other top diamond on this trick, so East could not get in to cash the hearts. Now the play reverted back to Greco’s line.


Despite having your values in the suits other than partner's, you should give preference to three diamonds now, and not repeat no-trump. Notwithstanding your decent club and heart values, you may find your stoppers are unsatisfactory if you have to give up the lead a couple of times. Let partner advance beyond three diamonds with extras.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 7 4 2
South West North East
Pass 1♣ 1♦ Pass
1 NT Pass 2♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 22nd, 2014

We ought to feel deep cheerfulness that a happy
Providence kept it from being any worse.

Thomas Hardy


North North
Both ♠ K Q 9 7
♥ K 2
♦ 9 3
♣ A Q J 8 5
West East
♠ J 10 6
♥ 9 5
♦ A Q 10 6 5
♣ 4 3 2
♠ 8 5 4
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ J 4
♣ K 10 7 6
South
♠ A 3 2
♥ Q J 10 7 3
♦ K 8 7 2
♣ 9
South West North East
1♣ Pass
1♥ Pass 1♠ Pass
1 NT Pass 2 NT Pass
3 NT All pass    

♦6

When Israel played Canada 15 years ago in the Round Robin of the World Junior teams in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, they played a set of virtually flawless bridge to eliminate Canada from the event. Consider the following board, where a potential Canada gain vanished.

In the other room, when Israel held the North-South cards, they had bid to one no-trump after mentioning all their long suits. This made in some comfort, of course. However, when Canada sat North-South on the auction shown, Darren Wolpert tried two no-trump as North, perhaps because his team needed a swing, Ben Zeidenberg raised to game. The diamond lead to the jack gave Zeidenberg the chance for an excellent play — and he took his best chance by ducking the jack. Back came a diamond, and West cashed his diamond winners — necessary, even though it set up a diamond trick for declarer — and this in turn allowed East to discard an encouraging club. Without that clue, it is not clear that West would have been able to decide between a club and a major suit at trick four. In the latter case, declarer would have collected nine tricks. However, West trusted his partner’s signal and shifted to a club. Now the defense had set up their fifth winner when East got on lead with the heart ace.

Well done, everyone — but one down and a small pickup to Israel instead of a big gain the other way.


This hand seems just a little too good for a jump to two spades (which is typically a hand with shape in the 12-14 range). This looks like a jump to three spades, since you want partner to bid game with anything approaching extras in the way of shape or high cards.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 9 7
♥ K 2
♦ 9 3
♣ A Q J 8 5
South West North East
1♣ 1♥ Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, August 21st, 2014

Everyone has talent. What's rare is the courage to follow it to the dark places where it leads.

Erica Jong


North North
North-South ♠ K Q
♥ Q 8 6 5
♦ 8 7 5
♣ K 5 4 2
West East
♠ J 9 8 4 2
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ 3 2
♣ A 9
♠ 10 6 5 3
♥ K 9 4
♦ Q J 10
♣ 10 6 3
South
♠ A 7
♥ A 3
♦ A K 9 6 4
♣ Q J 8 7
South West North East
Pass Pass
1♦ Pass 1♥ Pass
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

♠4

The final of the World Junior Teams between the USA and Italy was a generally well-played match, though it ended in a comfortable win for the Italians. The following board turned out to be a victory for neither side, but it highlighted the difference between the "scientific" and the "practical" approach.

Both tables played three no-trump by South on a spade lead — not a great contract but no game is really any better. Tom Carmichael followed the best practical chance for his contract here by taking the spade, knocking out the club ace, and winning the spade return to run the clubs.

This reduced everybody down to seven cards, and would have squeezed a defender who held five spades, the heart king and three diamonds. But it did not work this time, since all West had to do was hold his spades, while East could let a spade go in comfort to retain the red-suit guards.

At the other table, Mario D’Avossa found the remarkable line of cashing both spades at the first two tricks before exiting with a club. This diabolical line works if the defense rectifies the count by cashing all their spades; now when declarer runs the clubs, East is squeezed in the red suits! But Willenken as West could see this coming. He did well to play the heart jack at trick four instead of cashing the spades. This defeated the hand, since East had a spade discard he could afford on the run of the clubs.


Your 10-count would be at the lower cusp of an invitational jump to two hearts, until your RHO devalued your hand still further. Now it sounds as if both your minor-suit holdings are grounds for pessimism. I would bid just one heart now, planning to compete further if the opportunity arose.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q
♥ Q 8 6 5
♦ 8 7 5
♣ K 5 4 2
South West North East
1♣ Dbl. 1♦
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, August 20th, 2014

Nothing is more dangerous than an idea, when it's the only one we have.

Emile Chartier


East North
Both ♠ J 8 7 2
♥ K J 7 6 5
♦ A 7 3
♣ 8
West East
♠ 5 3
♥ A 10 9 8
♦ Q 6 4
♣ K 10 7 6
♠ 10
♥ Q 4
♦ J 10 5 2
♣ A Q 9 5 4 3
South
♠ A K Q 9 6 4
♥ 3 2
♦ K 9 8
♣ J 2
South West North East
Pass
1♠ Pass 3♣* Dbl.
4♠ All pass    

*Artificial limit raise in spades

♣6

Counting is one of the most important exercises at bridge, but sometimes you have to combine the exercise with a fair amount of inference and conjecture. Inferences may be drawn from what the opponents have or have not bid.

The 1999 World Junior Teams were held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. In the semifinal match between Israel and Italy, a match won comfortably by the latter, the eventual tournament winners, both tables made four spades, but the Italian declarer, Antonio Mallardi, had the tougher task.

He had reached four spades after the Israeli East had the chance to double an artificial club call. On a club lead to the ace, East found the accurate switch to the diamond jack, threatening to set up a winner for the defenders in that suit. Declarer won the diamond in hand and drew two rounds of trump. Now it looks to be a blind guess as to how to play the hearts, but there were inferences from the fact that West had led a low club that he did not have two of the top three honors in that suit. Since East, a passed hand, apparently had six decent clubs to the ace and queen, plus the diamond jack, he had no room for the heart ace or he would have opened the bidding. So Mallardi led a heart to dummy’s king for his 10th trick.

In the other room East had pre-empted in first chair so the heart guess was considerably easier to work out.


Although you have only a nine-count, your fifth trump and your fit for partner's suit suggest you are just worth a game-try of two spades. This is a help-suit game-try, asking partner to bid game with a maximum or with a suitable spade-holding. Partner should assume you have length but not strength in spades. You are closer to a bid of four hearts than to a pass.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 8 7 2
♥ K J 7 6 5
♦ A 7 3
♣ 8
South West North East
1♦ Pass
1♥ Pass 2♥ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, August 19th, 2014

My true love hath my heart, and I have his,
By just exchange, one for the other given.

Sir Philip Sidney


West North
Both ♠ A J 10 5 3
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 10 8
West East
♠ 8 6
♥ K 10 7 6 2
♦ 10 6
♣ 9 6 3 2
♠ K Q 7 2
♥ 5 4 3
♦ K 7 2
♣ K Q 7
South
♠ 9 4
♥ A J
♦ A Q J 9 3
♣ A J 5 4
South West North East
Pass Pass 1♣
1 NT Pass 2♥ Pass
2♠ Pass 3 NT All pass

♥6

At the 1999 World Junior championships, held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Italy dominated the qualifying round, with USAII and Denmark following closely behind. Norway and Israel were the only other contenders for the fourth qualifying place. The match between Israel and USAII appeared to have sunk the latter's chances, with Chris Willenken finding a nice play to pick up a game swing.

Both tables declared three no-trump after East had opened one club, but both Wests led a heart rather than a club. The Israeli declarer tried to maximize his chances in hearts. He ducked in dummy, won the lead cheaply in hand, then used the spade ace to cross to dummy to finesse diamonds. He could set up his long suit, but East could win his diamond king and establish the hearts, with plenty of ways to regain the lead. He still had a heart left to reach his partner, and set the hand one trick.

By contrast, at his table Chris Willenken focused correctly on the problem of entries to dummy; he was prepared to sacrifice the slim chance of an extra heart trick to increase his chances of getting to dummy twice and taking two diamond finesses. He put up the heart queen at the first trick, and when it held, he remained in dummy and thus had two entries to dummy to play on diamonds and take five tricks from the suit. That was enough for the contract.


Facing a reverse, we traditionally used to play a rebid of your suit as nonforcing and weak. The modern style is better; it uses a rebid of two spades as forcing for one round, and raises of partner's suit or preference to it as forcing. With a weak hand one agrees to play either two no-trump or fourth suit as artificial, fewer than eight HCP without five cards in your first suit. So a call of two spades here is just fine.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 10 5 3
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 10 8
South West North East
1♦ Pass
1♠ Pass 2♥ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, August 18th, 2014

Tut, tut, child.

Lewis Carroll


North North
Neither ♠ K 10 9
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 7 5
West East
♠ Q J 6 3 2
♥ 6 5
♦ A 7 5
♣ J 4 3
♠ A 8
♥ K 7 2
♦ Q 9 6 4
♣ 10 9 8 2
South
♠ 7 5 4
♥ A Q J 4
♦ J 8 3
♣ K Q 6
South West North East
Pass Pass
1♣ 1♠ Dbl. Pass
2♥ Pass Pass 2♠
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
3♥ All pass    

♠Q

With the world junior teams championship beginning this week in Istanbul, I shall be using deals from the 1999 event, held in Fort Lauderdale.

In the round-robin match between Denmark and Italy in the World Junior Teams, a textbook hand in suit-preference signaling came along. Unusually, it was the hand on lead making the suit-preference signal, rather than the hand following suit.

At the table Morten Madsen of Denmark as East had taken a calculated risk when he tried to push his opponents up a level with his call of two spades. The defense would have been able to take seven tricks against that contract, but when North doubled a second time just to show cards, South rather illogically decided against trying to take the penalty.

The opening lead of the spade queen held the trick. Now Kaspar Konow as West deliberately set up dummy’s spade 10 by leading a suit-preference jack at the second trick, knowing that his partner’s delayed support was very likely based on precisely a doubleton spade. Hence he had to prepare the way for a spade ruff. Madsen as East won his ace perforce and duly led a diamond (the higher of the minor suits) to ensure that he got his ruff. There was still the diamond queen coming to the defense for the setting trick.

Notice that if East had played a club after winning his spade ace, declarer gets in to draw trump at once, and the defendees lose their ruff.


Your red-suit values have not improved on this auction. The choice is to double one heart for penalty and decide what to do when the opponents run, or to bid one no-trump immediately to get your hand type across. I prefer that route; you may be able to balance into two hearts over a minor.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10 9
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 7 5
South West North East
1♦ Dbl. 1♥
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 17th, 2014

About midway through play in our rubber game, in four hearts doubled, East trumped a spade in her hand then later on played a spade from her hand. At the end of the hand, East was down two tricks doubled not vulnerable. Do North-South earn two additional tricks from East's one revoke? And how many more points do North/South score for the two revoke tricks, since the bid was doubled?

Number Cruncher, Troy, N.Y.

If the offenders won no further tricks (including the revoke trick) there is no penalty. If they won only one trick, the penalty is one trick. If the revoker won the revoke trick personally (by trumping in error) AND the revoking side won two or more subsequent tricks, there is a two-trick penalty. Those tricks are added to the nonoffenders' total — be they doubled or undoubled tricks. So here there appears to be a two-trick penalty, and you score as for four down doubled. That is 800.

When my partner opened two no-trump recently I was looking at both doubleton minor aces, jack-third of spades and jack-sixth of hearts. I transferred into hearts, then couldn't decide how to continue. Just for the record, my partner's assets included the top three hearts and five semisolid spades plus a stray queen, so we had 13 cashing tricks.

Richie Rich, North Bay, Ontario

Transferring to hearts. then inviting slam with a jump to four no-trump or a quantitative five hearts, sounds about right. With two aces I think you are just worth the second sequence. but getting to the grand slam is VERY hard. Your partner did well not to open one spade, when even getting to small slam might be beyond many.

Sometimes I feel the game is passing me by. In a recent column of yours, the bidding started with opener bidding one diamond and hearing a double to his left. After responder bid one spade, the fourth hand competed to two hearts, and opener doubled. What bidding convention is involved?

Hot Potato, Rolling Hills Estate, Cal.

This is a support double (where opener's double at his second turn to speak, of a call below two of partner's major, shows three trump; meanwhile, a direct raise shows four). It is now close to standard expert practice, but it is still not common except in duplicate circles. Would I recommend it? I'm not sure; it's a crutch but a reasonably useful one.

I dealt and opened one diamond with: ♠ A, ♥ K-J-5, ♦ Q-J-8-6-5-4, ♣ A-J-10. When I heard my partner respond one heart, was it right for me to jump in hearts or diamonds – or should I have done something else?

Hopping Mad, Pleasanton, Calif.

This is a very challenging problem. You are not worth a force to game of course, and jumping in diamonds on a suit headed by the queen-jack seems wrong. Equally, though, a raise to three hearts with three trumps would be unusual — though not entirely absurd. Perhaps a temporizing call of two clubs would work, so long as partner does not pass. Maybe even then you might find it was your best spot.

Do you have a strong view on the merits or otherwise of Bergen Raises, by which I mean converting responder’s minor-suit jumps facing a major-suit opening to be four trumps with 6-9 and 10-11 points respectively?

More or Less, Savannah, Ga.

My personal preference is still to keep my jump-shifts as strong. I am happy to lose the distinction between three- and four-card raises initially. I’d like to try to perfect my bidding in other areas, and do not wish to lose the important distinction between really good hands and invitational hands in the minors -– which is what Bergen tends to drive you to do It also tends to substitute system for judgment, I find. like Support Doubles. Finally, just for the record, in competition or by a passed hand they are a very bad idea. Fit-jumps work far better.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 16th, 2014

Life is not found in atoms or molecules or genes as such, but in organization; not in symbiosis but in synthesis.

Edwin Grant Conklin


East North
North-South ♠ 8 2
♥ A K Q 10 9 3
♦ A
♣ Q 10 5 2
West East
♠ K J 4
♥ 8 7 2
♦ J 8 3
♣ J 8 6 3
♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ 5 4
♦ K 10 7 6 5
♣ 9 7
South
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ J 6
♦ Q 9 4 2
♣ A K 4
South West North East
Pass
1♦ Pass 2♥ Pass
2 NT Pass 3 NT Pass
6 NT All pass    

♥8

This deal from the 1993 Epson Simultaneous Pairs was played at the top of the Post Office Tower in London with a host of dignitaries and assembled top players. It demonstrates the principle of not giving unnecessary information to declarer to allow him to count out your hand, an idea espoused by the great Jean Besse, who referred to the irrelevant small cards as neutrinos.

At the table North-South (who were playing weak no-trumps) reached six no-trump. On a heart lead declarer cashed the club ace and king, then ran the hearts as East discarded enthusiastically in diamonds. West — a former World Champion — threw three diamonds, and declarer played a spade to the queen and king.

West now returned a low club to the queen, East throwing a spade and South, a diamond. So far so bad from declarer’s perspective, but the diamond ace forced a spade from West. Now declarer knew that both defenders had only one spade left, as East was guarding diamonds and West clubs. He could thus play a spade to his ace in complete confidence.

Do you see the small defensive error? West knew she was going to have to discard a spade eventually, so she should have thrown one on the sixth heart. Then declarer does not get the complete count on the diamond suit and has to guess the spade suit in the ending. By showing a void in diamonds, West turned declarer’s hypothetical count on the deal into a sure thing.


Your partner's double is takeout, not penalties. (After doubling for takeout, you cannot convert the meaning of a second double to takeout; it simply shows extra values.) In the context of your pass over one spade, you could hardly be better for diamonds than you actually are. While a call of two diamonds could not be faulted, this feels like a hand worth three diamonds now.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 7 6 5
♥ 5 4
♦ K 10 7 6 5
♣ 9 7
South West North East
1♣ Dbl. 1♠
Pass 2♣ Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, August 15th, 2014

The day breaks not; it is my heart.

John Donne


West North
North-South ♠ A 7 4 2
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A 4 2
♣ A 10 5
West East
♠ K 10 3
♥ J 10 9 4 2
♦ J 5
♣ Q 7 4
♠ 9 8
♥ K Q
♦ Q 8 7 6 3
♣ J 8 6 2
South
♠ Q J 6 5
♥ A 5 3
♦ K 10 9
♣ K 9 3
South West North East
Pass 1♣ Pass
1♠ Pass 2♠ Pass
4♠ All pass    

♥J

High cards have their place, but often the fate of a contract hinges on the intermediates. Today's deal is just one such example.

The deal dates from a bygone era when South had no sophisticated maneuver available to him to consult with his partner on what game would be best. Had I held those cards, I would have tried three no-trump at my second turn to suggest this pattern, and let partner pass if he had produced a three-card raise or if he had an absolutely square hand like this. But then there would have been no story!

Today the contract of four spades was a deeply unattractive one, though the possession of the spade 10 might have given declarer some hopes of success. As it was, though, South needed to assume a highly favorable distribution in the side suits for repeated throw-ins.

He won the opening lead and extracted East’s trumps in two rounds. Then South crossed his fingers for the first time and threw East in with a heart for a minor-suit return.

East made the natural shift to a low diamond, letting South cash three tricks in that suit. West ruffed in and cashed his heart winner, but then had either to give a ruff-sluff or concede three tricks in clubs, whether he led high or low. Declarer knew the club honors were split since East would have exited in clubs at trick five if he had started with only small cards in the suit.


It is important when deciding whether to act with a marginal hand over a pre-empt to make your decision quickly or you may cause your partner ethical problems — as well as giving away information to the opponents. Here your heart length should be the deciding factor in going low. Let your partner balance with heart shortage.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 7 4 2
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A 4 2
♣ A 10 5
South West North East
2♥
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2014. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].